Several VLANS between 2 SG300-10

Similar Questions

• PowerConnect 5448 several VLANS between upstream and downstream server firewall

  I am struggling with what I thought, would be a simple task: route several subnets, each on one VLAN different, a firewall to a server.  In fact, I can't even pass the VLAN by default one still looking correct in the address tables and STP.

  Port 1 = firewall, VLAN 1 unidentified, 2 VLAN Tag, 1 PVID, tried the two trunk and general patterns

  17 = server NIC, VLAN 1 unidentified port, VLAN Tag, PVID 1 and 2 2, tried, tried both safe and general patterns

  VLAN 1 (firewall untagged) 10.84.195.0/24, 10.84.195.2 Interface IP and default gateway 10.84.195.1

  VLAN 2 (tag of firewall) 10.101.0.0/16, IP Interface 10.101.0.2 for 2 VLAN, firewall est.1

  The first thing I got was that something has not been properly marked by (Hyper-V, using SC VMM 2012 SP1) server or the firewall (Watchguard XTM 520).  Simple test: VPN Firewall, ping the switch to 10.101.0.2 with the tag, and works, remove the label and it doesn't.  Dynamic address table shows the two-way firewall.  Line 18 below appears right after the ping as planned on VLAN 2 with the same MAC address in VLAN 1.  In addition, I ping the switch 10.101.0.2 from the server and it works fine.  The table shows that VLAN 2 from the host (and 1 other VM), so it seems to me that everything is properly labeled.

  	15	VLAN 1	00907f8f571b	G1
  	16	VLAN 2	00155d1f1b07	G17
  	17	VLAN 2	001dd8b71c01	G17
  	18	VLAN 2	00907f8f571b	G1

  What I can't do, is ping through the switch to VLAN 2.  I can't ping my VPN server (10.101.20.1), and I can not ping to the gateway (10.101.0.1) from the server.  Note, it is not because of rules to firewall on each end.

  What Miss me?  I don't think I need a routing of layer 3 here, I don't have to go through VLAN, just have them several VLANS passes from one port to the other.

  Other things to note in case it is useful:

  -I have no connectivity not tag with everything else through the 10.84.195.xxx/24 switch.

  -If I delete the Tags VLAN port 2 1 trunk, I suddenly can ping the bridge VLAN 2 (10.101.0.1) from the server, although I suspect that it is because the same port is the default gateway for the switch.

  -For brevity, only 2 lines of the STP are listed below, but all ports are therefore based on the question of whether they are connected or not.

  G1 activated 128.1 Frw Desg P2P (STP) No. 4
  G2 activated 128.2 Dsbl Dsbl No. 100.

  -Latest firmware installed.

  -In addition, for people concerned about their security, I want to remove use VLAN by default in the future.

  Would it be possible for run you to stick your show output here in the forum.  In this way, we can take closer look at what you have configured.

  If you connect a desktop/laptop computer (with and intellectual property in the 10.101.0.0/16 range) in a port with the mode of access switchport VLAN 2 are you able to ping IP Interface 10.101.0.2 for 2 VLANS?  You could try to disconnect the firewall and the configurations for the port and work on getting through the switch with 2 terminals on a single VLAN.  Then, once this is confirmed as work connect the firewall back up with a trunk/general mode adding the VLAN necessary.

  You connect to the firewall on a layer 3 interface?  You need Layer 3 routing to reach the firewall correctly.

• Problem with VLAN between Cisco Catalyst (3560G) and SG300-52

  I am having trouble with the creation of a trunk of vlan between a SG300-52 and a Cisco Catalyst 3560 G.  I have 4 VLANS (1, 2, 10 and 11) on the 3650 and I need ports on the SG300 to be able to communicate with them.

  On the 3560, port 14 is defined as:

  interface GigabitEthernet0/14

  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

  switchport mode trunk

  spanning tree portfast

  On the Sg300 port 52 is defined as:

  interface GigabitEthernet52

  point to point link type spanningtree

  switchport trunk allowed vlan add 1,2,10,11

  description macro switch

  Try to understand what the problem... Any help would be appreciated.

  Thank you

  Chris

  Hi Chris, the first problem is the spanning tree portfast, it shouldn't be on an interconnection network switch. You may have a mismatch of vlan native as well, but that shouldn't matter.

  A suggestion, however, the value of the port SG300 general mode and disable the input filter.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• Disorders from several VLANS layer 2 layer 3

  Hello

  We have a layer switch 3 PowerConnect 6248 switch with multiple VLANs and active routing and also a layer 2 with a PowerConnect 5324 switch couple VLANS configured.  My goal is to have several VLANs, through level 3 for the layer 2 switch switch and all VLANS communicate between them.

  I followed the steps under the 3 layer + Layer section 2 to the title of this post:

  en.Community.Dell.com/.../19506015

  Unfortunately, it does not work.

  Here is my current set up and what I tried. My configuration is made via the web interface.

  The 6248 has VLAN 1, 64, 110, 150 and some other configured on the switch. The IP address of the 6248 is 192.168.64.1.  I'm trying to get some vlan 150 and 110 for the layer switch 2 for may I have some ports in the service of vlan vlan portion 150 and some 110.

  I have the IP routing (routing > IP > Interface Configuration) for vlan 150 as 192.168.150.1/24 and vlan 110 as 192.168.110.1/24.

  The 5324 is connected to the 6248 via a port (connected to the port 1 of the 5324 and 18 the 6248).  18 on the 6248 port is currently configured as general / Admit All/PVID 150.  Port 1 on the 5324 is currently configured for the same, but with a PVID of the 1.  150 of VLAN is sent without the label of the 6248 switch and vlan 110 is sent labeled.

  5324 switch is configured with an IP 192.168.150.2 and a gateway of 192.168.150.1.  I am able to access the web interface of the switch and connect machines in any port and get on the 192.168.150.0 subnet.  I created a vlan 110 on the 5324 and it the tag on ports 1 and 4, but port 4 will not any traffic to vlan 110. I tried many settings of belonging to port / vlan various which have all resulted in failure.

  I would greatly appreciate help on this.  It seems that such an easy feat, but I just can't understand it.  I have attached some pictures for people to see.

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  I had figured it out.  I enabled Double VLAN on the trunk of the 6248 switch port and it works now.

• WLC 2504 several VLANs multiple SSID

  I have three sites

  Data center management unit A - main - controller + Access - Point IP 172.16.x.x - Vlan 38

  Unit B - system managed by controller IP 172.17.x.x - Vlan 38 Access Points

  Unit C - system managed by controller IP 172.18.x.x - Vlan 38 Access Points

  In the network topology OSPF runs. We have several VLANS about 38 we wish to propagate through SSID, but maybe I'm not create more than 16. How to make a movement of the user of a unit for unit B how do mention Vlan IP for the user because it is 38 Vlan spread on each unit.

  UNIT A - UNIT B - UNIT C

  |                            |                               |

  172.16.X.X 172.17.X.X 172.18.X.X

  |                            |                               |

  VLAN 2-38 VLAN 2-38 VLAN 2-38

  |                            |                               |

  AP-1                          AP-2                        AP-3

  |                               |                               |

  User to user-1 user-2-3

  Need of advice and suggestion

  Hello Saad,

  If I understand your scenario, you have 2-38 or 16 VLAN for each unit. To ensure exactly the addressing specific IP must be assigned to the user, you must create groups of AP and add AP group particular AP. Let's say for the 1st floor that you used the subnet 192.168.1.0/24 and AP-group1 so all the first floor AP will be in AP group1. In addition to browse documents cisco you will get any idea on AP groups concept.

  In order to obtain roaming when users move from one unit to another unit we configure mobility in the controller. As OSPF is already running then you have reach-ability between the controller.

  Hope this information helps you.

• 1252 config several VLAN trunking on ethernet not

  Hi all I am new to these forums, but have read some posts on configurations for an AP from 1252 to switch 2950.

  I have several VLANS andmultiple SSID configuration on my ap.  The switch knows the VLANS on the access point

  I think that in the config.

  When I put the 2950 in trunk mode on the port, the ap is conencted too, I can see no longer the access point. And none of my ssid / VLAN traffic through the stem net ether to the switch.  I think I have a problem with the config of the ap specifically either in the British Virgin Islands (do not understand this virtual port) or in bridge groups. (Never worked with foredeck groups.)

  The AP is in stand-alone mode.

  Here is my config on the side of the ap.

  interface Dot11Radio0

  no ip address

  no ip route cache

  !

  the cipher mode vlan 300 encryption tkip aes - ccm

  !

  broadcasting-key vlan 300 change 600 members-notice change in capacity

  !

  !

  SSID 101

  !

  SSID 300

  !

  countermeasure tkip duration of maintaining 120

  gain of antenna 0

  Base-1 speed, 0 2.0 5.5 11.0 6.0 12.0 9.0 18.0 24.0 36.0 48.0 54.0 m0. M1. M2. M3. M4. M5. M6. M7. M8. M9. M10. M11. M12. M13. M14. M15.

  root of station-role

  Bridge-Group 1

  Bridge-Group 1 block-unknown-source

  No source of bridge-Group 1-learning

  unicast bridge-Group 1-floods

  Bridge-Group 1 covering-disabled people

  !

  interface Dot11Radio0.100

  encapsulation dot1Q 100

  no ip route cache

  Bridge-group 100

  100 block-unknown-source bridge-group

  No source of bridge-group 100-learning

  No bridge group 100 unicast-flooding

  Bridge-group 100 covering people with reduced mobility

  !

  interface Dot11Radio0.300

  encapsulation dot1Q 300

  no ip route cache

  Bridge-group 255

  Bridge-group subscriber-loop-control 255

  Bridge-group 255 block-unknown-source

  No source of bridge-group 255-learning

  No bridge group 255 unicast-flooding

  Bridge-group 255 covering people with reduced mobility

  !

  interface Dot11Radio1

  no ip address

  no ip route cache

  !

  the cipher mode vlan 300 encryption tkip aes - ccm

  !

  broadcasting-key vlan 300 change 600 members-notice change in capacity

  !

  !

  SSID 101

  !

  SSID 300

  !

  countermeasure tkip duration of maintaining 120

  gain of antenna 0

  DFS block 3 Strip

  Speed - Basic6.0 9.0 12.0 18.0 36.0 24.0 48.0 54.0 m0. M1. M2. M3. M4. M5. M6. M7. M8. M9. M10. M11. M12. M13. M14. M15.

  channel SFR

  root of station-role

  !

  interface Dot11Radio1.100

  encapsulation dot1Q 100

  no ip route cache

  Bridge-group 100

  100 block-unknown-source bridge-group

  No source of bridge-group 100-learning

  No bridge group 100 unicast-flooding

  !

  interface Dot11Radio1.300

  encapsulation dot1Q 300

  no ip route cache

  Bridge-group 255

  Bridge-group subscriber-loop-control 255

  Bridge-group 255 block-unknown-source

  No source of bridge-group 255-learning

  No bridge group 255 unicast-flooding

  Bridge-group 255 covering people with reduced mobility

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0

  no ip address

  no ip route cache

  automatic duplex

  automatic speed

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0.51

  51 native encapsulation dot1Q

  no ip route cache

  Bridge-Group 1

  No source of bridge-Group 1-learning

  Bridge-Group 1 covering-disabled people

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0.100

  encapsulation dot1Q 100

  no ip route cache

  Bridge-group 100

  No source of bridge-group 100-learning

  Bridge-group 100 covering people with reduced mobility

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0.300

  encapsulation dot1Q 300

  no ip route cache

  Bridge-group 255

  No source of bridge-group 255-learning

  Bridge-group 255 covering people with reduced mobility

  !

  interface BVI1

  IP 10.131.10.70 255.255.255.0

  no ip route cache

  !

  51 of VLAN is what I'm trying to trunk more.  VLAN 100 is my networks vlan normal almost everything at the moment.  And my attempt to secure traffic wireless to a new vlan Vlan 300 more course on my local network.

  VLAN 51 has no ip address range

  IP VLAN 100 range is 10.131.10.0

  10.131.11.0 between 300 VLAN

  The routing goes to my switch 3750 core / router, but the access point is conencted to a 2950 namely shared resources to my layer distribution on a stack of 2975.  Once again the vlan 300 works on the 2975 stack and will pull dhcp if it is enabled.  Have not tried this on the 2950 yet, but I suspect it will also work based on the setting of the trunk on the s950 battery of 2975.

  In any case, I want to be able to do is have multiple VLANs configured on the AP (from most secure to least guarantee based on the capabilities of the equipment) and that traffic vlan tag go to my 3750 possibly for other guidelines.

  Here, any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Thank you for taking the time to read this.

  Sincerely,

  Kevin Pulford

  Systems administrator

  Harmon city, Inc.

  Yes, remove the vlan 51 can tell vlan 100 is the native, and there will be a link to bridge - Group 1.  Then change the switch port to vlan 100 native.  You should then be able to reach the access point via telnet/GUI.

  orders will be:

  config t

  No int dot11radio0.51

  No int dot11radio1.51

  No int g0.51

  int dot11radio0.100

  100 native encapsulation dot1q

  int dot11radio1.100

  100 native encapsulation dot1q

  int g0.100

  encapsulation dot1q 100 natively.

  To be sure, save reboot and wr mem.

• SA520W VPN from Site to Site with several VLANs

  Hello

  I have a customer here with several VLANS in their places who wants to set up a VPN from Site to site between 2 devices SA520W. Unfortunately I can not find a way to set it up. In the VPN policy, I can choose between everything (which is not what I want, I want only traffict between subnets the routed via VPN), IP address unique, a beach (in a subnet) and a subnet itself - but only one. I don't find a way to configure several subnets in the selection of local traffic and remotely. Adding another IKE policy between the 2 sites does not either (which is good normally).

  Any ideas? Anything I'm doing wrong?

  Thank you for your help.

  Best regards

  Thomas

  I know that if you have an ASA or a router, you can define as VLANS to pass through the tunnel.

  Do not have access to a SA520W to test...

  A recommendation might be to post the question on the SMB community where they answered questions related to this product, just to check what other people did.

  Federico.

• VLAN: ESXi <>- Cisco SG300

  Hey everybody,

  I always try to get the hang of networking with ESXi/vSphere...and I was little confused as I had a configuration problem.

  I have an Intel NUC5i5MYHE with 5.5 ESXi. As he has that one NETWORK card I am configuring a trunk so I can separate groups of ports within the host with the VLAN.

  Cisco SG300 has several VLANs (including: HAND = 10, LAB1 = 20, LAB2 = 30). * 1 is still active but VLAN native = 999 *.

  MAIN are all fair access Ports on VLAN10 (10UP).

  GE22 is a trunk with VLAN 10, 20 and 30 with label (10T, 20T, 30t, 999UP).

  A few groups of host ports ESXi has currently (simply called the VLAN I want installation and set on the VLANs)

  Also, I created the extra VMkernel port with VLAN10 just for wasting his time with (I can't access to this IP address, but after looking at VMK0, I think that I need to add static routes to the bridge?)

  V0 & VMkernel 0 = VLAN 0 (none)

  V10 & VMkernel 1 = VLAN 10

  V20 = VLAN 20

  So, with this configuration, I am unable to access the host via vSphere Client. However, if I put GE22 on SG300 to 10UP (10UP, 20T, 30t) I AM able to access... but is not what I want, right?

  To my knowledge... 0 (none) passes a VLAN while 4095 (all) does not take into account any VLAN tags completely, sending the frame as-is to the customers. (While I would let VMK0 0 (zero) as the correlates directly to my unique NIC physical, right?)

  So... my computer that connects with the vSphere Client Gets VLAN10 penetration tag (access). Switch then forwards Egress GE22 through the trunk to the ESXi host with a labeled VLAN10 framework.

  The framework should be accepted at the VMK0 whatever the tag VLAN and connect or if the frame belonged to another customer sent on the vSwitch... unless I'm confused here somewhere.

  Can someone enlighten me please?

  Thank you

  Basically, you have two options. If native/default of the physical switch port VLAN is set on the Management VLAN, then do not set a VLAN ID on the management VMkernel port group, otherwise the value the VLAN ID on the virtual side. Ultimately that a single point (the physical switch port, or the virtual port group) is responsible for the labelling/close the network frames.

  André

• PowerConnect 2848 - several VLANS on the 1 port does not

  Hello everyone.

  I have a Dell PowerConnect 2848.  My router is a Netgear SRX5308. In the router, I've created several VLANs (VLAN ID 10 and 20) and would that pass to the ESXi server. If I connect the ESXi server directly to the router, everything works as expected. My VMs are picking up correct VLAN based on the parameters of ESXi.

  I need the 2848 between the two, because I need to add more devices and other servers with a VLAN specific.

  Currently I use port 25 for switch 2848.

  I put the switch to managed mode.

  I created switch-> VLAN-> belonging to a VLAN, VLAN ID 10 and 20.

  I select 10 VLANS and put the T on port 25.

  I select the VLAN 20 and put the T on port 25.  (I also tried to put a U on them, just to try, but did not work)

  But my virtual computer are not able to reach the DHCP on the router.

  Spanning Tree is enabled.

  I'm obviously missing something...

  I have already passed last week banging my head on this, but have not been able to pass traffic along.

  Help, please!

  So you're on the right track. If port 25 is facing the router? What port must face the ESXi Server? That port should also have VLAN 10 and 20 should be labelled.

• Several VLANs on bridges series 1300

  Hello

  I'm looking to plug a small building outside of a main bridge wireless campus. The building, I connect currently has two VLANs, the 1300 series bridges carry several VLANs via the wireless bridge? If so someone can point me to s document that explains it?

  Thank you very much

  Simon

  Hi Simon,.

  Yes they can, here is a link, I hope it helps you, look at the title of "bridge Configuration.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/wireless/ps4570/products_configuration_example09186a00801d0815.shtml

  Kind regards

  Milton Tizoc.

• 4235 IDS Sensor monitoring several VLANS &amp; TCP Reset (packet Injection)

  I understand that the 4235 sensor can receive traffic are split to several VLANs than 802. 1 q tags have been placed on the switches (3750 of in this case).

  I have two questions (account required to the statement above in correct).

  1 is it possible to inject traffic (eg. reset the TCP sessions) in each of VLAN monitored (i.e. the 4235 would mark the package injected with good destination VLAN for the response) or only the native/actual VLAN the SPAN destination.

  2. is the traffic carried by the 4235 as coming from multiple virtual interfaces (eg. for the period of INVESTIGATION purpose spoof detection within each VIRTUAL local area network)?

  Thanks much for the reading of the same day. Any input greatly appriciated.

  On your second question, no. monitored traffic is considered as coming from a single virtual interface. The sensor reads the header of the vlan on the packages wrapped and includes with the alarm and more uses for TCP resets. But, you can apply signatures for traffic VLAN specific sensor is followed.

• Several VLAN, SSID

  I get to the point where my campus wireless network grows beyond the size of the subnet that I am uncomfortable dealing with.  I have a WISN and WCS and spin the latest IOS on each.  Is it possible to use several VLANS on a campus-wide SSID?

  Or, can I put the same SSID on both controllers and map it to two separate without causing problems roaming VIRTUAL networks?

  Thank you

  Eric

  Hi Eric,.

  Yes we do, and this feature is called grouping AP on WLC... Here is the sample configuration to do the same thing...

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk722/tk809/technologies_configuration_example09186a008073c723.shtml

  Concerning

  Surendra

• Affecting several VLANS to a Port Group

  Hi all!

  We have 2 switches farm of server connections to the host server. Each of our 8 ESX servers has 4 physical network adapters that support virtual machines. We have 2 network cards to each physical switch. We have a single vSwitch and 2 port VM groups set up on each ESX Server. We use and configuration active / standby in Port groups so we can control what physical move the VM speaks to. All 4 network cards are available for the Group of ports, with connections going to spend 1 active and forward to switch connections 2. It is reversed on the other group of Port.

  We have several VLANS associated with our data center. Is it possible to put the tag VLAN on 2 port groups VM to support multiple VLANs? Otherwise, I think we have to put up a pair of these groups of ports for each VIRTUAL local area network, we want to make it available to the virtual machines on each ESX Server. Is this correct? We have some circuits/EtherChannel enabled on switches that work properly. However, we cannot port VM groups to pass traffic unless label them us, and it seems we can only enter a VIRTUAL local area network in the area.

  Thank you in advance for your help!

  Steve Hurd, MCSE, CCNA, VCP

  To use the trunks that are coming in your ESX host, you must have your VLAN Tag somewhere along the way.  If you are not at the level of the switch (since you're trunking), you will need to do the vSwitch, either the level of the virtual machine.

  VSwitch level, this by creating exchanges and then marking at the level of the port group.  Marking that is currently happening in the ESX/vSwitch, and your vm must use the port suitable for group the VLAN they need to use.

  Your last option is to tag at the level of the virtual machine itself.  To do this, your vSwitch must use VLAN 4095 tag, which allows all the VLANS to pass through, and all tags are marked.  The portgroup vSwitch here is basically a tunnel and will allow the unmodified traffic, but now, you have to mark your VLAN of the NETWORK adapter in your virtual machine.  It is very effective if you have a large number of virtual machines.  The most practical method will be to create the VLAN-based exchanges at the vSwitch level and go from there.

  Unlettered, somewhere, communication will not incorrectly, as the physical switch will assume that all traffic not marked will even vlan uses unmarked frames (vlan native), and machines on that vlan can communicate each other.

  -KjB

• Communication between 2 SG300 - 28 p with an OFFSET of the VLAN

  Hello

  I have 2 SG300 - 28 p without a router used for the use of the backbone.

  The switches are configured in L2.

  I want to configure on the two switches:

  • The default VLAN Id 90
  • A VLAN with 80 Id to access databases
  • A VLAN Id 70 to access the backup server
  • An agregate with port 25, 26, 27, 28
  • The ports 1 to 8, 13 and 20 with VLAN 80 (90UP/80 t)
  • 9 to 12 ports, 21 to 24 with VLAN 70 (70UP)

  Computers that connect to the VLAN 70 won't be intended for the VLAN 70.

  I would like to use the mode of access ports in VLAN 70.

  Computers that connect to the VLAN 80 will not be intended for 80 of VLAN.

  It seems that servers on the local network VIRTUAL 80 switch 1 can communicate with servers on the 80 VLAN on switch 2.

  My problem is that the servers on the VLAN switch 70 1 access to the servers on VLAN 70 on switch 2.

  I guess it is because the 90UP of LAG 25/26/27/28 configured.

  Any idea to solve this problem?

  The OFFSET is like any other link. It is configurable. You should be able to connect to the CLI

  config t

  PO1 int

  switchport mode trunk

  switchport trunk vlan native 90

  switchport trunk allowed vlan add 70,80

  -Tom
  Please evaluate the useful messages

• VLAN between 2 powerconnect 6224 using XFP modules

  Dear friends,

  I have 2 switches powerconnect 6224 interconnected using optical fiber and XFP ports on the rear panel of the switch.

  There is no configuration of the battery between them.

  The distance between the two switches is 500 metres and they both work correctly when you use the vlan by default (use of the LAN)

  I created a virtual LAN using 2 ports on a firewall and I created the same vlan on the second firewall, but I can't see a VLAN traffic goes to the other.

  Also, I tried to configure the port as trunk but same result.

  The vlan works very well in a single switch, but traffic is not able to flow to the second switch.

  You have an idea why does not?

  Maybe is not posible to have VLANs using xfp connections...

  Any idea would be greatly popular.

  Thanks in advance!

  Rear ports are labeled xg1, 2, 3, 4. So, if the connection is made using the xg1 on a single switch for xg1 on the other switch. Then you enter interface 1/xg1 and make configuration changes.