Signature CSM policy

I want to apply a consistent policy of signing on several routers using IOS IPS and managed by a Cisco Security Manager. I created the new policy, and the signatures are configured in a default manner. I would like to do the equivalent of the category 'all' and ' retires true ' commands then begins to build my contract but I can't figure out how.

Is there a way to withdraw from all the signatures and then the UN-withdraw signatures/categories that relate to my environment? Also modify them individually, of course.

I managed only devices IDS by WSC, so this may not be accurate for you, but you can select several lines and then right-click to change actions (note that it's important on the field in which you right click).

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

  • installation of update of signature for JOINT-2 AIP - SSM

    Hi every one, im not sure about this issue but I think its beter ask you experts.i want to know that if I update the signature for example for my JOINT-2 can I install this update of GIS on my AIP - SSM--> assume that software IPS on both devices are same and I also installed the license key valid on AIP - SSM.now can I do this or not? and I know that if you do not license installed on JOINT-2 you cannot install any point of GIS on JOINT-2 but this topic AIP - SSM? I want to say I can install updated GIS on AIP - SSM without installed the license key valid on AIP - SSM? Thank you

    There are 3 main types of Signature updates.

    (1) IPS sensor Signature Update

    (2) updates of Signature CSM for IPS sensors

    (3) signing IOS IPS updates

    The IPS Signature Update file name is in the form: IPS-GIS-Sxxx-req - Ey.pkg

    That's probably what you are referrnig to in your message. This file can be installed on ANY device IDS/IPS or Module.

    Here, the requirement is not the platform but rather the level of the engine. The part "req - Ey" in the file name indicates that the sensor has already run the 'y' the software engine level.

    If a file IPS-GIS-S436-req - E3.pkg can be installed on any IDS/IPS device or Module as long as the software on this sensor is a version of the 'E3 '.

    The CSM updates are updates of signature for the Cisco Security Manager. They contain special files that SCM uses to update, and then also included in the JLC update is the update of real sensor described above. CSM unpackages the CSM update, updates and then uses this file embedded to upgrade the actual sensor.

    The third type of file is for routers IOS loaded with the special IOS software that has the distinction of IOS IPS where the router itself (instead of a separate module of the IDS/IPS) keeps track of the signature.

    These updates to the signing IOS IPS settle on the real router and are not installed on the Modules or the sensor IDS/IPS devices.

    So to answer your question, yes the same Signature Update for your JOINT-2 is the exact same Signature Update for your SSM modules.

    The same exact file is available through several different paths on cisco.com. But no matter which way cisco.com you have downloaded the file, you can always install it on all the Modules and the IDS/IPS Appliances.

    With respect to licensing, the license works the same on all Modules and the IDS/IPS Appliances. A license must be on the sensor for the Signature Update to apply.

    NOTE: A trial license is available at cisco.com for new sensors to allow you to get everything set up properly for your sensor to be covered by a service contract and get the standard license for the service contract.

  • IPS (7.0 (7) E4) on ASA-SSM-10 block DNS without alerts

    Hi all

    I have the IPS module:

    Build version: 1.1 - 7, 0000 E4

    ASA 5500 Series Security Services Module-10

    Update of the signature S652.0 2012-06-20

    Journal of the ASDM inferred events:

    4 June 26, 2012 18:21:47 193.227.240.38 53 IPS 65347 sd-out asked to drop the UDP packet from outside:193.227.240.38/53 to dmz1:sd - outside/65347

    But the IPS not deducted from alerts - it does not explain why blocking these packets. DNS requests cannot just one network.

    ! ------------------------------

    ! Current configuration last modified Tue Jun 26 18:01:58 2012

    ! ------------------------------

    ! Version 7.0(7)

    ! Host:

    !     Realm Keys          key1.0

    ! Signature Definition:

    !     Signature Update    S652.0   2012-06-20

    ! ------------------------------

    service interface

    exit

    ! ------------------------------

    service authentication

    exit

    ! ------------------------------

    service event-action-rules rules0

    filters edit PROXY

    attacker-address-range 192.168.72.7

    actions-to-remove deny-attacker-inline|deny-packet-inline

    os-relevance relevant|not-relevant|unknown

    exit

    filters edit Q00000

    signature-id-range 5684

    attacker-address-range 95.190.8.0-95.190.8.255

    actions-to-remove deny-attacker-inline|deny-packet-inline

    os-relevance relevant|not-relevant|unknown

    exit

    filters edit Q00001

    signature-id-range 5684

    victim-address-range 95.190.8.0-95.190.8.255

    actions-to-remove deny-attacker-inline|deny-packet-inline

    os-relevance relevant|not-relevant|unknown

    exit

    filters edit USERS

    signature-id-range 1102,5237,2152,5684,2100,5581,3030,6061,3030,11020,5403,5474,20020,60000-60100

    attacker-address-range 192.168.0.0-192.168.255.255

    actions-to-remove deny-attacker-inline|deny-packet-inline

    os-relevance relevant|not-relevant|unknown

    exit

    filters edit USERS2

    signature-id-range 5575-5591,2151,21619,2150-2151

    attacker-address-range 192.168.0.0-192.168.255.255

    victim-address-range 192.168.0.0-192.168.255.255

    actions-to-remove deny-attacker-inline|deny-packet-inline

    os-relevance relevant|not-relevant|unknown

    exit

    filters move PROXY begin

    filters move USERS after PROXY

    filters move Q00000 after USERS

    filters move Q00001 after Q00000

    filters move USERS2 after Q00001

    general

    global-deny-timeout 14400

    exit

    target-value low target-address 192.168.0.0-192.168.255.255

    target-value medium target-address 192.168.1.0-192.168.1.255,192.168.64.0-192.168.64.255,192.168.3.0-192.168.3.49,192.168.65.128-192.168.65.255

    target-value high target-address 192.168.72.2-192.168.72.254,192.168.66.0-192.168.67.255,192.168.2.0-192.168.2.255

    target-value mission-critical target-address 192.168.65.0-192.168.65.127

    os-identification

    calc-arr-for-ip-range 192.168.0.0-192.168.255.255

    exit

    exit

    ! ------------------------------

    service host

    network-settings

    host-ip 192.168.64.194/24,192.168.64.1

    host-name gw1-ips

    telnet-option disabled

    access-list 192.168.0.0/16

    dns-primary-server enabled

    address 192.168.66.2

    exit

    dns-secondary-server enabled

    address 192.168.72.19

    exit

    dns-tertiary-server enabled

    address 192.168.72.20

    exit

    exit

    time-zone-settings

    offset 360

    standard-time-zone-name GMT+06:00

    exit

    ntp-option enabled-ntp-unauthenticated

    ntp-server 192.168.64.1

    exit

    summertime-option disabled

    auto-upgrade

    cisco-server enabled

    schedule-option calendar-schedule

    times-of-day 04:20:00

    days-of-week sunday

    days-of-week tuesday

    days-of-week thursday

    days-of-week saturday

    exit

    user-name dimaonline

    cisco-url https://198.133.219.25/cgi-bin/front.x/ida/locator/locator.pl

    exit

    exit

    exit

    ! ------------------------------

    service logger

    exit

    ! ------------------------------

    service network-access

    general

    enable-acl-logging true

    never-block-networks 192.168.0.0/16

    exit

    exit

    ! ------------------------------

    service signature-definition sig0

    signatures 60000 0

    alert-severity low

    sig-fidelity-rating 50

    sig-description

    sig-name XPress Administrator Service

    sig-string-info Access to Administrator Service

    sig-comment External user open Admin

    sig-creation-date 20120622

    exit

    engine service-http

    max-field-sizes

    specify-max-uri-field-length no

    exit

    regex

    specify-uri-regex yes

    uri-regex [Aa]dministrator[Ss]ervice[.]asmx

    exit

    exit

    service-ports 80

    exit

    event-counter

    event-count 1

    event-count-key Axxx

    specify-alert-interval no

    exit

    alert-frequency

    summary-mode summarize

    summary-interval 15

    summary-key Axxx

    specify-global-summary-threshold no

    exit

    exit

    vulnerable-os windows-nt-2k-xp

    specify-mars-category yes

    mars-category Info/Misc/Login

    exit

    exit

    signatures 60000 1

    alert-severity low

    sig-fidelity-rating 50

    sig-description

    sig-name Xpress Bridge

    sig-string-info Service URL

    sig-comment External Access to bridge

    sig-creation-date 20120625

    exit

    engine service-http

    regex

    specify-uri-regex yes

    uri-regex [Bb]ridge[/][Ss]ervice[.]asmx

    exit

    exit

    service-ports 80

    exit

    event-counter

    event-count 1

    event-count-key Axxx

    specify-alert-interval no

    exit

    alert-frequency

    summary-mode summarize

    summary-interval 15

    summary-key Axxx

    specify-global-summary-threshold no

    exit

    exit

    status

    enabled true

    exit

    specify-mars-category yes

    mars-category Info/Misc/Login

    exit

    exit

    signatures 60001 0

    alert-severity high

    sig-fidelity-rating 90

    sig-description

    sig-name FreePBX Display Extentions

    sig-string-info Acces to Extentions settings

    sig-comment Weak Password Detection

    sig-creation-date 20120622

    exit

    engine service-http

    event-action produce-alert|deny-attacker-inline

    regex

    specify-uri-regex yes

    uri-regex [/]admin[/]config[.]php

    exit

    specify-arg-name-regex yes

    arg-name-regex display

    specify-arg-value-regex yes

    arg-value-regex (extensions)|(trunks)

    exit

    exit

    exit

    service-ports 80

    exit

    event-counter

    event-count 1

    event-count-key Axxx

    specify-alert-interval no

    exit

    alert-frequency

    summary-mode summarize

    summary-interval 15

    summary-key Axxx

    specify-global-summary-threshold no

    exit

    exit

    exit

    exit

    ! ------------------------------

    service ssh-known-hosts

    exit

    ! ------------------------------

    service trusted-certificates

    exit

    ! ------------------------------

    service web-server

    enable-tls false

    port 80

    exit

    ! ------------------------------

    service anomaly-detection ad0

    internal-zone

    enabled true

    ip-address-range 192.168.0.0-192.168.255.255

    tcp

    enabled true

    exit

    udp

    enabled true

    exit

    other

    enabled true

    exit

    exit

    illegal-zone

    enabled false

    tcp

    enabled false

    exit

    udp

    enabled false

    exit

    other

    enabled false

    exit

    exit

    ignore

    source-ip-address-range 192.168.0.0-192.168.255.255

    exit

    exit

    ! ------------------------------

    service external-product-interface

    exit

    ! ------------------------------

    service health-monitor

    signature-update-policy

    enable false

    exit

    license-expiration-policy

    enable false

    exit

    event-retrieval-policy

    enable false

    exit

    exit

    ! ------------------------------

    service global-correlation

    exit

    ! ------------------------------

    service aaa

    exit

    ! ------------------------------

    service analysis-engine

    virtual-sensor vs0

    physical-interface GigabitEthernet0/1

    exit

    exit

    I confirmed with the Ironport team that this IP is a bad host in sensorbase. This is the reason for the traffic of this host being removed. There could be several reasons for this subnet to the list, for example, it could be part of a controlled host known by spammers. You must reach out to the development team for a confirmation however.

  • CSM (Cisco Security Manager) 4.10 error discovery of ASA with service-policy

    Hello

    I have a problem with the CSM 4.10 and ASA. When I try to discover a CSM ASA I get two internal errors:

    Failure of the policy of discovery: com.cisco.nm.vms.discovery.DiscoveryException: internal error

    Exception, important political group: id = 7992934205670, type = PG firewall. InspectRule, name = .fw - namePG.FIREWALL.InspectRule.

    If I remove the global "service-policy global_policy" line, everything works fine.

    I tested ASA 5505 (7.2.5) and ASA 5512 X (9.1.6.11).

    Any suggestions?

    Hello

    You can try with the following solution, please make a backup of the prior agreement of the CSM Database to apply it, in case

    1. stop the daemon manager.

    2 reset the password for the database "vms".

    To do this, open a command prompt in the CSCOpx/bin directory and issue the following command 'perl dbpasswd.pl dsn = npwd = admin vms'

    * This resets the password DB "admin".

    3. to connect to the DB using the utility program.

    4. run the following query.

    5. validate the changes:

    Type 'make' utility and press "run".

    6 close the utility tool, and then restart the daemon manager.

    I would like to know how everything goes, and in the case the issue persists, then open a case with TAC

  • Is it really possible to return signatures IPS of CSM

    Hi people,

    I tried to return IPS signatures that I deployed through policies of the Signature of the CSM to the old version, but it doesn't seem to work. Against this Cisco CSM guide says:

    If you decide that you don't want to apply an update of the signature, you can return to the

    last update by selecting the political level Signatures on the device, by clicking on the view

    Update level button, then click on restore

    I can't imagine that it is possible that the signatures are normally compiled into xml files. How the sensor would he?

    Eugene

    When installing a copy of the files that will be replaced or updated during the installation is copied to a backup directory.

    The CLI has a "downgrade" command that can uninstall the update and backup copies will be used to replace the removed files.

    A few things to know:

    (1) old configuration will be copied back. If the changes made since the update may be lost.

    (2) this only works for Signature and engine updates. Service Packs, minor updates and major updates replace the full operating system, so there is too much data to make backup copies.

    (3) this only works for the update installed. Once you have decommissioned the more recent, you cannot downgrade the earlier.

    (4) this can be done through CLI and now also available in MSC.

    Here are some things to check for in your situation where it seems to not work.

    Log on to the sensor and run 'display the worm '.

    History in the output of 'see the worm' shows a package of Signature Update as the last installed update?

    If it is then either an another downgrade was already completed, or Major Update, minor update, or Service Pack has been installed the last packet and cannot be downgraded.

    If it cannot be done through CSM you could try the CLI' "downgrade" command and see if it works through the CLI or if the CLI gives you an error and the explanation.

  • IPS 4260 - how to see the signature enabled in CLI and CSM

    How many signatures is enabled. ?

    The CSM sees how many signatures is activated?

    and what is the command in the CLI, where can I see how many signatures I've activated

    The IPS Manager Express, it's easy to see how much is activated.

    Better compliance

    René Rolsted

    Through CSM, you can see what are all signatures are enabled.

    If you want to know the County. You must filter the signatures in defining active = True, and then you can export it as a. CSV file. If you open that excellent by sheet.you can get the count.

    It may be useful

    Thnaks,

    Suresh.

  • Where should I add the policy to ban the non-administrateurs to apply the signature update seller?

    Original title: prohibit the non-administrateurs to apply the signature update vendor

    Where should add this policy? Should it be added to the default domain policy? Please notify

    Thank you

    Hello

    The question you have posted is better suited for the TechNet forums.

    Please ask your question in the following link for assistance.

    http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/w7itpro

    It will be useful.

  • Digital signature policy error - when I try to install VMWare Server 2 on Windows 2003 R2 SP2

    I'm the following error during installation. What can I do?

    Error 1718. File C:\WINDOWS\Installer\c855d7df.msi was rejected by didital signing policy.

    Hello

    Date of issue:

    When you try to install VMware Server on a Windows Server 2003 host, you can see the error error 1718. Installer_name.msi file was rejected by digital signature policy.

    Solution: For more information and possible solutions, see http://support.microsoft.com/kb/925336. Make sure that your operating system has all the latest updates applied.

    Solution:

    Click Start and run, type control admintools, and then click OK.

    Double-click local security policy.

    Click Software Restriction policies.

    Note If no software restrictions is listed, click on Software Restriction policies and then click on create a new policy.

    Under object Type, double-click enforcement.

    Click all users except local administrators, and then click OK.

    Restart the computer.

    J.

    If you have found this device or any other answer useful please consider the use of buttons useful or Correct to award points.

    Post edited by: janlib

  • Why my signature policy does not change when he comes back to me in a response

    I created a HTML signature with images and text in Dreamweaver. Looks like out in Thunderbird, but when he returned in the response type lost it formatted and is bigger. Any thoughts?

    Always? Or just some correspondents? Some may choose their email in plain text. Or they may be using an e-mail client that superimposes model that its own. This is frequently met with people who use Outlook.

  • Signature Edition in Australia return policy

    Hello

    I'm indenting to buy a signature edition XPS 13 9350 since the Microsoft Store in Australia. However, I'm not sure if if your stores adopt a system similar to apple Exchange, in which devices can be exchanged on the counter in their shop because of problems with the equipment under warranty. It comes about because I have seen many comments, stating that the XPS 13 has intermittent screen flashing issues and touchpad.

    Or is guaranteed to the signature edition devices made by the manufacturer, then Dell for this case?

    Thank you

    Hello

    We do not work for Microsoft; We are mainly volunteers here.

    I suggest you contact the Microsoft Store with your questions:

    http://www.microsoftstore.com/store/msaus/en_AU/home

    See you soon.

  • I need assistance with my auto signature and why my emails when I answer you are only bolded?

    I can't my auto signature of normal appearance. Every time now that I'm going to answer an email, he makes bold all the e-mail.
    Can you please help?
    Thank you

    If the police is important, then you must do all of this as an image. E-mail cannot guarantee to display in your policy chosen; your font may not be not installed or available on the machine of the recipient and in all cases, the beneficiary may replace or ignore your font settings.

    You say you tried 'all options' but that does not tell us what you have, and more importantly, have not tried.

    Yet once, how did you create your signature?

  • invalid signature detected at startup

    I just bought a HP Evoy 700-216 model. I replaced e OS Centos 6.5 and now I get

    "Invalid signature detected. Visit the secure boot policy. "at the first reboot.

    How can I fix it?

    You have replaced the factory OS with a BONE which does not recognize the function "Secure Boot" of the BIOS. You may need to ENABLE 'Secure Boot' and 'Legacy Support' in the BIOS. Please see computers HP - Secure Boot (Windows 8) and HP computers - about UEFI and the Boot Menu for more information on the subject and possible solutions.

    If you have any other questions, feel free to ask.

    Please click the 'Thumbs Up' white LAURELS to show your appreciation

  • RE: update IDS4210 to Signature S289

    Hello

    With respect to improving the network of the device IDS above, just read through the "Cisco IPS Active update Bulletin: 05/06/2007" which was sent to me he States:

    "The update of the signature S289 DO can apply to 5,0000 E1 version or later sensors as follows:

    "This update of the signature is taken in charge on the IDS 4210, IDS-4215, IDS-4235, IPS-4240, 4250-IDS, IPS-4255 and sensor devices IPS-4260 series.

    But to read the Readme file on the site it says:

    "The upgrade of IPS-GIS-S289-req file - E1.pkg can be applied to.

    the following sensor platforms:

    -Sensors, IPS-42xx Cisco Intrusion Prevention System (IPS)

    "- Intrusion (IDS) of Cisco IDS-42xx detection system sensors (except the IDS-4210, 4220-ID and ID-4230).

    What is the good?

    A little confused.

    Kind regards

    Mark

    It is a grey area.

    The IDS 4210 found end of sale December 6, 2003:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/PS4077/prod_eol_notice09186a008032d508.html

    By the strategy of Cisco, it will support updates the signature on a near-end sensor sales for at least 3 years from the end of sale. So update of Signature support was guaranteed by the policy only up to the last 3 dec 3006.

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/PS4077/prod_bulletin0900aecd80358daa.html

    However, nothing has been done to intentionally prevent signature extract newer than Dec 2006 to be installed on an IDS 4210.

    I'm not aware of any project at this stage to intentionally prevent installation of updates of peg on a 4210 IDS.

    In addition, understand that politics is a minimum of 3 years, but I don't know how much longer, 3 years he would be officially supported.

    5.1 IPS software will continue to receive updates of signature for a period of 18 months, and it is possible that these GIS 5.1 updates will continue to be installable on a 4210 IDS.

    This confusion is probably why the 2 documents are not synchronized.

    In addition the signature update readme E1 was written for updates of 6.0 and IDS-4210 is not supported in 6.0. 5.1 versions did not pass to E1 only later. When the readme file has been updated to cover the two 5.1 and 6.0, it is possible that the change of platform support list (to add IDS-4210) was just gone unnoticed. So, I'm not sure if she was intentionally set no support for IDS-4210 or if it was a mistake of editing.

    Personally, I would recommend go ahead and install it (except off your config before moving just in case).

    If it installs OK (no bugs don't pop up during installation), then you should be fine works on your ID-4210.

    But if problems arise in the installation of an update future signature, then you click on this grey area. And I don't know what the answer would be if that were to happen.

    I'll send an email to our in-house team and see what the word "official" is on ID-4210 sig update support.

    However, I recommend that you go ahead and see about upgrading to a new model of sensor.

  • Update Signature IPS S511 for Security Manager

    Hello!

    Anyone tried to use up-to-date signature IPS S511 for Cisco Security Manager?

    I downloaded the IPS-CS-MGR-sig-S511-req-E4.zip file and checked md5 somm. The amount calculated was as specified on the cisco.com site. But it is impossible to use the zip file.

    Unzip the following shows:

    [email protected] / * /: / tmp/u > unzip-l IPS-CS-MGR-sig-S511-req-E4.zip
    Archive: IPS-CS-MGR-sig-S511-req-E4.zip
    End-of-Central-Directory signature not found.  Either this file is not
    a zip file, or it is one of the discs of a archive in several part.  In the
    This last case the central directory and zipfile comment will be located on
    the last records of this archive.
    unzip: cannot find zipfile directory in one of the IPS-CS-MGR-sig-S511-req-E4.zip or
    IPS-CS-MGR-sig-S511-req-E4.zip.zip and cannot find IPS-CS-MGR-sig-S511-req-E4.zip.ZIP, period.

    WinZip is an error too.

    had the file IPS-CS-MGR-sig-S511-req-E4.zip be removed as with 8,0000 3427 MARCH upgrade?

    Kind regards

    This issue has been addressed and CSM should be able to retrieve and deploy S511 successfully.

    Scott

  • Error when adding new subnet for CSM group

    Hello

    I'm trying to add a new subnet to an existing group in the CSM v4.0.1 b7823 company.  When you add a new subnet to the Group (the other elements of the group is a different subnet), CSM emits several errors for each SAA touched:

    Description:

    BB (GROUPNAME), referenced by the 'Http network' on maps (DEVICENAME) device to multiple network IP addresses!

    Cause:

    Made http refers to a network object that corresponds to more than one IP address on the device

    Action:

    Please config the policy with the network object that resolves to a single IP address.

    There is an error for ICMP as well.  The group is already a /24subnet content, I don't think it's a clear mistake.  Has anyone encounter this?

    Thank you very much.

    Justin

    Hi Justin,

    what you observe is normal given the way in which we have set up the remote access policy. As you probably know, in cli, you can specify only one rule of access by line for ssh, http, telnet etc...

    For example, if you want to allow ssh access to ASA lines host 1.1.1.1 and 2.2.2.2 you put two

    SSH 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 outside

    SSH 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 outside

    The CSM, we model this two lines as two different object, so the building of network type block object that refers to the object of type ssh access can have only one entry. This behavior is the same for ICMP as well.

    Access list is different because we model to the CSM in a different way, plus you can use the object-group put on different networks. It is not possible to access to the device.

    I hope that gave you an overview a little more on the reason

    Also it would be nice to score this answer if this is the case

    Stefano

Maybe you are looking for