slower than the utility exp expdp!

Similar Questions

• 2 x Satellite A350-22z but that is slower than the other

  My homefriend and I same computer laptop Toshiba A350-22z but my laptop slower than others.
  I hope that the problem is the highest frequency; mine is %32 other is 100%

  http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/7532/39490208.jpg

  What is the problem in your opinion?

  Hi erdemrek,
  I don't see what exactly is the problem you are talking about but:
  If you have the same processor, the same amount of ram, same brand, model, same installation then everything should be the same.
  What do you mean "more frequently" unfortunately I don't speak your language to that effect, I can't read the text on your image.
  If you test the speed of the machine to be sure to use the same utility (benchmark).
  load on a system differs depending on the services and applications launched and running.
  could you give some more information about this problem?

  as a first step, you can try to change the hard drive and see if there is no change. If it's a software problem, it should appear on the other machine as well when changing the hard drive.

• slower than the 6s iPhone iPhone 7

  Based on the review and my iPhone experience 7 runs more slowly than the iPhone 6s by restarting, opening of the games of the app. So should I prefer iPhone 7 on iPhone 6s or not because of the downgrade in iPhone performance 7.

  Buy what fits your needs and your budget best.

• Adding faces process is slower than the previous version

  It's feedback to Apple.

  The previous version of Photos where you can select a large number of photos at once, was much faster than the current version that shows you only a maximum of 8 photos at once.

  Other questions:

  If you take lots of photos (of your children, for example), you could not go to Faces often enough to stay with her. As a result, I just spent two sessions of 30 minutes + to select 1000 photos of my daughter's face. Previously this would have taken 10 minutes on the smallest thumbnails.

  Once you click on ' Add and continue "could you realized you made a mistake, but you can't go back. You must enter the mass of photos later and try to find the error. I think it is much easier to do things when you evaluate a volume at a time.

  When you click on ' Add and continue "ago a long processing time to get to the next batch of 8. You start to lose focus when there is such a gap. It makes the whole process very tiresome and repetitive.

  Probably other things.

  It would be great if this process could be reassessed at some point.

  My Mac specs: 8 GB, 3.5 GHz Intel Core i5, AMD Radeon R9 M290X 2048 MB, end of 2014

  It is strictly a user help forum and Apple isn't here - you can give them your comments here - http://www.apple.com/feedback/photos.html

  LN

• Download spead is slower than the high speed internet download speed

  Wireless laptop: this computer's Internet speed is about 18 MB, 3 MB of loading. runs great

  Computer PC: I had problems with downing video short loading like a YouTube. I tested the range cable to the modem and the router. For this computer, I have less than 1 MB then download 2.3 MB download. Defrag, cookies, drive, all is as it should be, ram 4 and Charter Security Suite up to date.

  Is it possible Mozilla is part of the problem with the slow download PC and higher load up?

  If you use a Flash based speed test, you will need to optimize first Flash until you get useful results during the test. Check out this thread: Firefox too slow to react.

  About video downloads, make sure that you are completely up to date with your software from RealNetworks.

• Satellite Pro M70-275 slower than the Satellite M70-110?

  Hello

  A couple of weeks ago, I bought a portable Satellite M70-110, with Centrino 1.7 GHz processor and 512 MB RAM. Last week, this computer got stolen from my apartment. (Damn them thieves low-life..)
  I wanted to buy exactly the same model again, but he could not find anywhere. Instead, I bought a Satellite Pro M70-275 because he seems to be pretty much the same thing, with a great 2 GHz. processor, it's going to be a little faster then, I thought.
  The problem is that it feels like the new is slower; I don't understand why. No more slow, as when you are working with graphics heavy, cause I don't have, but slower at startup, when this regime between programs and so on.

  The old used XP Home Edition, the new one XP Pro. This could be the problem; XP Pro requires more RAM?

  The old man had an ATI Radeon x 700, the new a x600se, but I can't imagine that this could make a difference with the applications that I am running.
  I use a Soundblaster PCIMCA card in the new. This could be a problem?

  Any ideas appreciated!

  Johannes Ogren
  Göteborg, Sverige

  Hello

  As much as I know there is not much difference between WXP Home and Pro, and I think that the use of the PCMCIA card. Try to turn off the sound in the BIOS and also disable it in Device Manager.

• WRT160N speed much slower than the old WRT300N

  Speedtest.NET reports 5Mbsec vs 15 mbcvm old router. Cox's ISP.  I tried to disable UPnP as not suggested, no effect.  I tried to change the MTU to 1300 and 1350 as suggested by others, no effect.  Any other ideas?

  What is the version number of your router?

  What is the Security Mode?

  To get the best speed through the router, it took to set the Mode of WPA or WPA2 security. Also, try it out below mentioned parameters.

  Open an Internet Explorer browser on your computer (desktop) wired page. In the address bar type - 192.168.1.1 and press ENTER...
  Let the empty user name & password use admin lowercase...

  Click on the Wireless tab

  Click the sub-tab under wireless > Wireless Security...
  Change the mode of WPA wireless security, encryption, select TKIP. Password input your desired WPA key. For example, MySecretKey, this will serve as your network key whenever you connect to your wireless network. Do NOT give this key to anyone and do not forget the key.
  NOTE: The password must be more than 8 characters...

  Click the settings advanced wireless
  Change the tag to 75 interval, change the Fragmentation threshold to 2304, change the RTS threshold to 2304 and click on save settings...

• Wireless connection is slower than the hard line on WRT54G. Why?

  I adjust the wireless connection

  Base rate: all THE

  Transmission rate: 54Mbps

  It is still slow as a wired connection. Is this because the WEP security settings?

  Best regards

  Chen min

  Yes, WPA2-AES can go up to 300 Mbps (or more) on the bands of 2.4 and 5 Ghz as long as your wireless adapter supported this speed.

• The "N" wireless Internet speed is 30 to 50% slower than the wired connection

  I have verizon Fios internet 25mbps and I get up to 30 on my desktop which is connected directly to the modem, but my laptop on my netgear rangemax Wireless-N 150 router gets 10-13mbps, not far from the router, how can I get the laptop, go faster.

  Hi JTBisaha,

  Wi - Fi connection, the speed reduction could be due to several reasons. Few of them are listed below:

  1. There could be interference in the network you use.

  2. There may be a lot of users are using the same network at this moment

  3. the point of network access can be blocked by something at that time.

  Follow the steps below:

  Method 1: You can follow the steps described in the article below and check if it helps.

  Why is my Internet connection so slow?

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/why-is-my-Internet-connection-so-slow

  Method 2: You can temporarily turn off firewall or one Anti Virus and check if it helps.

  Disable the anti-virus software

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/disable-antivirus-software

  Firewall: Frequently asked questions

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/firewall-frequently-asked-questions

  Note: Please reactivate the antivirus software once the diagnosis is made.

  I hope this helps!

• Comments of race to clock slower than the clock of the host

  My Windows XP guest clock is slow, causing problems in my date Outlook, reminders, etc. under Windows, but the clock on the iMac to the host is correct. How can I fix this?

  Thank you

  VMware Fusion (menu bar) > help > VMware Fusion help > creating virtual machines > VMware Tools > configure VMware Tools

• Why Firefox MUCH slower than the 8.1 9.0? Just downloaded and tried and am used to dramatic improvements instead!

  It's a fact! Web pages load much more slowly, and I deleted the cache and done all the typical checks of my pages frequently visited with the same result.

  I just found the problem. For some reason, when I upgraded to 9.0, the settings in tools/options have been modified in the section on how Firefox connects to the Internet. I found to be returned to: 'use the system proxy settings' when I had previously put in "no proxy settings." Once I changed back, the speed is back up on top of the browser and everything checks very well now. Just in case you guys that see happen, then check this particular setting.

  In my situation, I am just connect to Sprint broadband with card data and did not the routers or network worry except that Windows 7 has implemented when I update software Sprint from time to time. This suggests that maybe Firefox 9.0 was just delivered to this particular my computer configuration, although it worked well like that. I hope this might help someone else!

• Using the C-series SCTL DIO module with slower than the top level [FPGA] clock

  Hey all,.

  I'm running online research on a problem that I have a lot of success.

  I have a chassis with integrated FPGA, top-level 9030 clock 40 MHz.  I have a NOR-9401 DIO C Series module plugged and the value that will be managed by the FPGA target.  I need to count some linear encoders to exactly 10 MHz, no more, no less.  They are periods and gives a result of such kind that if I oversample or underestimate, I get garbage.

  If I create a SCTL and assign a source of synchronization derived from 10 MHz, I get an error code generation who:

  "Node read e/s for DIO3 FPGA is used in a clock domain that it does not support.  Areas of clock supported include: the clock of higher and clocks that have a rate that is a multiple of 40 MHz, for example 40 MHz, 80 MHz, 120 MHz and so on. »

  I tried several ways to work around this problem; First I tried just using a while loop with a loop set to 4 is ticking timer, but it then takes 9 clock cycles to perform the count for a reason any (although this code may compile in the SCTL without any problem).  I then tried to use the SCTL with a constant of 'true' AS a hack for a 'timed sequence' framework-related, and that certainly has not worked.

  Are there any strategies or techniques, or settings somewhere to work around this limitation on the AID I need to taste exactly 10 MHz?  I'd like to do this quickly in the software and get this rolling as soon as POSSIBLE.

  An image of the relevant section of the code is attached, I'm happy to provide you more things on request.

  Thank you very much!

  Maia Bageant

  Thanks for the reply!  The problem ended up being a hardware problem based on how coders were connected.  Now that I've fixed it, they're perfectly happy are oversampled.

  I guess my question is always legitimate to other applications, but not necessary for encoders a.

• Query on the view runs slower than the direct request

  Hi all

  I created a simple display and when I run the view she takes more time and when I run the query it answer quickly.

  Here are the plans of the explain command

  Query:

  Execution plan

  ----------------------------------------------------------

  Hash value of plan: 2867537711

  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | Operation | Name                       | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time |

  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |                            |     1.   153.  107   (1)| 00:00:02 |

  |   1.  COUNT                         |                            |       |       |            |          |

  |*  2 |   OUTER HASH JOIN |                            |     1.   153.   107 (1) | 00:00:02 |

  |   3.    NESTED LOOPS |                            |     1.   101 |     4 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  |   4.     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | TBLWEBINSPR |     1.    58.     2 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  |*  5 |      INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | IDX_SUBSRIBER_WEBINSPR |     1.       |     1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  |*  6 |     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | TBLMACCOUNT |     1.    43.     2 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  |*  7 |      INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_USERNAME_ACCOUNT |     1.       |     1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  |*  8 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL | TBLTNETWORKSERVICEINSTANCE | 12828.   651K |   103 (1) | 00:00:02 |

  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  
  

  Explain the Plan of view:

  Execution plan

  ----------------------------------------------------------

  Hash value of plan: 3639776364

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | Operation | Name                       | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time |

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |                            | 12889.    61 M |   824 (1) | 00:00:10 |

  |*  1 |  VIEW                   | V5                         | 12889.    61 M |   824 (1) | 00:00:10 |

  |   2.   COUNTY |                            |       |       |            |          |

  |*  3 |    EXTERNAL RIGHT HASH JOIN |                            | 12889.  1925K |   824 (1) | 00:00:10 |

  |*  4 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL | TBLTNETWORKSERVICEINSTANCE | 12828.   651K |   103 (1) | 00:00:02 |

  |*  5 |     HASH JOIN |                            | 12889.  1271K |   721 (1) | 00:00:09 |

  |*  6 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL | TBLMACCOUNT | 12865.   540K |   583 (1) | 00:00:07 |

  |   7.      TABLE ACCESS FULL | TBLWEBINSPR | 17680.  1001K |   137 (1) | 00:00:02 |

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Query is:

  Select rownum as id, tw.subscriberidentity as user_identity, tw.password, tw.customertype, tw.expirydate, tw.status, nvl (decode (lower (tn.isportal), 'yes', 'yes', 'no', 'no'), 'yes') as passwordcheck,.

  fn_getEncryptionType (TM.encryptiontypeid) as encryptiontype, tw.servicetype, tn.maccount, tn.isroaming, tn.isportal, tn.iprange, lower (replace (fn_getmodemmac (tn.referenceaccountid),'-')) as modemmac,

  NVL(fn_getclientmac(TN.referenceaccountid),'A4-BA-DB-B7-FA-10') as clientmac, 'DEN Delhi address' as address, tn.networkkeyid, decode (lower (tn.isroaming), 'yes', null, 'no', "0:8 ='|") TN.iprange) as checkroaming,

  'ACC0000000' as cacno, ' [email protected] ' as cemailid, 'The account name' as cname, like cmobile's ' 7567077034', '66099965606' as coffice from (select distinct referenceaccountid, param2 Minventa, param4 )»

  IsRoaming, param5 isportal, param6 iprange, NTWRKSRVINSTANCEID networkkeyid of tbltnetworkserviceinstance where systemgenerated = 'n') tn, tw, tblmaccount tm tblwebinspr where

  TN.referenceaccountid (+) = tm.accountid and tw.subscriberidentity = tm.username and tm.accounttypeid = 'ACT08' and tm.systemgenerated = ' don't

  Please suggest.

  Kind regards

  Ronak Masudi

  You do not have show us the request, the view definition or the predicate for the plans section; but speculation obvious that you have included the rownum inside the view definition - which makes a view no-that can be merged that must be instantiated before the predicate of the query can be applied.

  Concerning

  Jonathan Lewis

• The repeated CFC function call is much slower than the UDF version

  For a project, we were faced with unexpected behavior of a CFC. Without going to much into the details of the project, it boils down to the following: when we run through a set of records, say 100 and apply a function to this topic, the overhead is 4-5 seconds extra when we call it a component instantiated (only once) compared to when code us as a UDF. Since our application can process thousands of records in 1 past the overload will quickly over 100 seconds compared to the UDF.

  I was wondering if there is no logical explanation for this behavior. From what I understand a function called from a component should not add any notable overload after the component was instantiated.

  Our installation is an installation of Coldfusion 8 Jrun running on Linux. We didn't really find anything on the web documenting this (or we found we have said that there will be no additional charge). We could modify the function call to a call from the UDF, but we prefer to keep in a CFC as there are more things behind the scenes that just formatted data.

  B.

  HA!  Cool!!! I think I solved it something, I feel so proud.

  I run the code of Adam and the first time I ran it I got similar to Biebel3 results.  But it's curious, I got the output of debug it showing that it wasn't show where the time was spent.  He would show almost two full seconds to build the page of CFCS, but the components in the table of debugging only added up to about 50 milliseconds.

  I tired first put a top of the page of CFC, but that has not changed the results.  Because even if you do not display the results, ColdFusion still satisfied the debug output.  I went into the administrator and effectively disabled the debugging feature.

  Alto, I started to have the results displayed by Adam.

  It seems that it is a question where it takes a lot of overhead for ColdFusion compile a record of debugging for each call of CFC in this large loop.

  The good news, this is a pretty easy solution for a production system.

• Slower than other computers on the wireless network

  Hello
  I get a download speed that is slower than the other two laptops using my wireless network. I have 20 MB broadband and get ~ 3Mbps when I test the speed. Usual maximum download speed is 12-15 Mbps for other laptops. Download speed (~ 1 MB/s) and service effiency (92%) are the same I have connect directly or connect wirelessly.
  I plugged directly on the wide-band receiver and speed was ~ 12 Mbit/s, then there is a problem with the wireless connection.
  I ran diagnostics using Intel PROSet and there seems not to be problems. I can't understand why the download speed is stuck around 3 Mbps. Any ideas?

  DELL Inspiron 1520
  Intel Wireless WiFi Link 4965AGN (802.11 g)
  NETGEAR 54Mbps WGR614 v7