Validation rule to exclude a role and a channel

Similar Questions

• Smarlist and validation rule

  Hello

  I have a member named "is it a project": who has a smarlist attached to what ""Yes "or" NO": If Yes: we want users to enter the amount in dollars and if it didn't it must be left blank." "" However, there are some users who always enter numbers even if it not a project. Is that what I can do to restrict them to enter data if they choose No..

  I tried with validation rules, but I can only change the color of the cell. but not prevent them from entering.

  Thank you.

  Data validation cannot prevent users enter or data backup.  It can be used to prevent users from data in the promotion approval process.

  You could write a business rule that withdrew their data based on the value of the smart list, however I generally hesitate to write rules that delete data in this way, as it tends to surprise users.

  Hope this helps,

  -Jake

• Please - need help changing the rules to exclude certain hosts/guests

  I need to find a way to exclude certain hosts and invited only a few rules, and I can't seem to understand.  Here is my example.

  I have a guest who I want to disable monitoring of the 'Memory of Virtual Machine of VMW Swapping' State.  The guest I want to exclude the rule is called "ucapmil1 (QAUCL).

  So I in the field field of application of this particular rule rule:

  "VMWVirtualMachineMemory where virtualMachine.name does not correspond to ' ucapmil1 (QAUCL)"

  I also tried

  VMWVirtualMachineMemory where monitoredHost.name! = 'ucapmil1 (QAUCL).

  Neither seems to make a difference.  Can someone point me in the right direction?  Thanks in advance.

  Try using esxServer.name

• How to add validation rules - do not have access to data tools

  Hello

  I would like to add a validation rule so that when import us data from Salesforce to Eloqua we provide are mobile phone numbers in the international format, in order to send SMS messages.  Oracle Help was given instructions to do this ()http://docs.oracle.com/cloud/latest/marketingcs_gs/OMCAA/index.html#Help/DataTools/DataTools.htm) but, it requires access to the "Information Tools" and pay more money.  Is there a way I can add a validation to otherwise rule?  Maybe using program Builder?

  
  

  Any help is very appreciated as always!

  
  

  Alex
  

  Hello

  You can use the "validation rule" in the shared list. Here you can apply the validation rule.

  Kind regards

  Eloqua expert

• Validation rule of error to a value greater than $999,999,999,999.99.

  A validation rule of error for an input value of the user of something higher to $999,999,999,999.99 seems to work only when the amount is 1,000,000,000,100.00 in Oracle policy Automation when written as a Word document rule.

  If the value is implemented at the level of the attribute, then it works for the maximum value of $999,999,999,999.99. And immediately places an error for any value greater than $999,999,999,999.99 even a value of $1,000,000,000,000 is picked up. However, it will be against best practices which is the mixture of source and validation rules.

  I tried all kinds of conditions such as rounding, truncation etc and none seem to work correctly outside validation of the attribute levels.

  @

  Looks like you have to face a maximum value for the validation.

  Do you really need set a very high maximum value? I suggest you enter a maximum value that is a little less than 999,999,999,999.99

  See you soon

  Frank

• Table - jump on existing records Validation rules

  Hi all

  JDeveloper version: 12 c stack-(je l'espère, le comportement doit être le même en 11g ainsi)

  I created an af:table of editable records in them. And there is a Date beginning with minValue set to the current date (the value is read in backing bean)

  < af:inputDate value = "#{bindings." StartDate.inputValue}"required =" #{bindings. " StartDate.hints.mandatory}.

  columns = "#{bindings." StartDate.hints.displayWidth}.

  shortDesc = "#{bindings." StartDate.hints.tooltip}"id ="id1 ".

  minValue = "#{pageFlowScope.BackingBean.currentSysDate}" > "

  Example:

  Name	Value	Start date	End date
  Parameter 1	10	03/10/1999	06/10/2050
  Parameter 2	20	05/10/2014	06/10/2050

  Parameter 1 is an old drive

  Parameter 2 is a new record

  Problem:

  When you submit the changes with the confirmation key that ADF trying to validate the parameter 1 and 2 setting for the Start Date.

  And it seems to happen in the java script on the client side.

  I was expecting that it would be only to validate new records, or modified records.

  Question:

  Is there a way I can force the ADF to the validation only on the changed lines and new lines?

  Thank you

  SAPP

  It looks like a the only option is to leave the MinValue feature in calendar component and implement validation on the server side.

  I prefer to do this validation as part of the validation from EntityObject as this coding in doDML() rules

• Validation rule is not suitable for the calculated figure

  Hello
  
  I want to add a validation rule in my data form. My requirement is in the form of data, I want the value of line 2 should be greater than (value of line 1 * 0.2).
  Now when I am trying to solve this problem through validation rule I do not find these conditions that are consistent with this case. Is there a way to get out of this scenario in order of validation?
  
  Thanks in advance.

  Hello. So you have at least two segments in your dataform (line1, line2)
  As we cannot make math operators with cell values in the validation rules, it seems that you must create formulas row3 (with the hide option)
  It's very simple, as follows: [1] * 0.2
  And then, you can create your validataion rule:
  Value of the row IF 2<= row="" value="">
  Then the cells of process...

  You can also include additional conditions for missing values in lines 1, 2, as appropriate

• Trying to auto generate roles and privileges

  Hello all,.
  
  Oracle 11g v11.2.0.1.0 on Windows Server 2008 Enterprise
  
  I have a database with many schemas. One of the patterns is referred to as the CM_MASTER schema in that it was granted the following: s/n, create user, drop user, alter user, create any table, select any table and a few others, all with the clause "with admin option".
  
  We have developers who need to select only the access to tables and views non-maitre patterns. My plan was to create a unique ROLE for each schema, then grant select on each table and discovers in this scheme to this unique role. Then grant the role appropriate to every developer therefore giving them only read access.
  
  I can accomplish the above manually when you are logged in as the CM_MASTER schema.
  
  I am creating a procedure owned and run by the schema CM_MASTER which creates a new role and then give this role. The procedure accepts a parameter that contains the username of the target schema. The procedure is able to create the role (create a role scott_r) successfully.
  
  However, I get an error of insufficient privileges (see below), after that the role was created, trying to issue the command "grant select on scott.some_table to scott_r" via "immediate execution".
  
  Any ideas, what privilege (s) the user needs CM_MASTER to be able to issue the grant (s) for the role?
  
  Error message below:
  
  exec ('scott') gen_schema_role;
  Error report:
  ORA-01031: insufficient privileges
  ORA-06512: at "CM_MASTER. GEN_SCHEMA_ROLE', line 30
  ORA-06512: at line 1
  01031 00000 - "insufficient privileges".
  
  
  The procedure code is below:
  Utl_file.put_line commands have been added for debugging, but nothing came out.
  When the "immediate execution" lines are commented, the utl_file.put_line command output displays the correct SQL create and grant statements.
  
  create or replace
  procedure gen_schema_role (p_db_user in varchar)
  as
  v_role_name varchar2 (30);
  
  v_bat_out utl_file.file_type;
  
  cursor get_object_names is
  Select object_name dba_objects
  where owner = upper (p_db_user)
  and object_type in ('TABLE', 'SEE')
  and status = "VALID".
  and object_name not like "DR$ %.
  and object_name not like '% XT;
  
  Start
  
  v_bat_out: = utl_file.fopen ('SR_BACKUP', 'Create_Roles.sql', 'W');
  
  v_role_name: = substr (p_db_user, 1, 28). '_r';
  
  UTL_FILE.put_line (v_bat_out, ' ');
  UTL_FILE.put_line (v_bat_out, 'create role' | v_role_name);
  
  run immediately "create role" | " v_role_name; < <-this seems to work, the role is created
  
  for a get_object_names in
  loop
  UTL_FILE.put_line (v_bat_out,' grant select on ' | p_db_user |) '.' || a.object_name | « à » || v_role_name);
  
  run immediately ' grant select on "| p_db_user | '.' || a.object_name | « à » || v_role_name;
  end loop;
  
  UTL_FILE.fclose (v_bat_out);
  
  end gen_schema_role;
  
  
  
  Thank you
  Snyds

  Hello

  It seems that CM_MASTER needs to GRANT any OBJECT PRIVILEGE.

  And this should be given directly to him (not by the role DBA, which you shouldn't use anyway)

  My guess is, however, that this will not work unless scott has actually created his own one or more tables.

  Concerning
  Peter

• FDM Validation rules

  I wrote a validation rule FDM for the audit report. I want to check the value of assets - shares - commitment. As I wrote this code, the report seems good too long that the result of this calculation is not zero. But if the result is zero, the line is marked as ERROR. Any ideas on how to avoid it?

  This is the logic of the rule that we use:

  fun:

  Dim dblVal

  dblVal = ABS (|, YourAssetAcctHere, [high PEAK], Allcustom1, Allcustom2, Allcustom3, AllCustom4L, |-|, YourLiabilityandEquityAccountHere, [high PEAK], Allcustom1, Allcustom2, Allcustom3, Allcustom4L, |)

  If dblVal< 5="">
  "Past the validation rule.
  RESULT = True

  ElseIf dblVal > = 5 and dblVal<= 10="">
  ' Pass the Validation, emits warning
  RESULT = True
  RES. PstrCheckMessage1 = "WARNING!" Trial balance is unbalanced.

  ElseIf dblVal > 10 then
  ' Validation failed
  RESULT = False
  RES. PstrCheckMessage1 = "Trial Balance is out of balance, please correct!

  End If

• TO Check - Validation rules

  If I want to write code for the control of TB is balanced, where I usually would do it? What is in the rules of validation or scripts?
  
  I tried to write a validation rule, declaring that "assets - shares - passive = 0 ' and I want to see the value of this calculation in the audit report. But I couldn't have this value in the audit report. Although in the audit report, I could see that the rule status fails. But the value column does not show the actual result. Someone knows how to display column value with the result of the calculation and always show status as if failure ' assets - shares - responsibility <>0.

  Hello

  This can be done in two ways...

  Using Script to validate the After/Before you can write a script to check the zero balance...
  and if the balance is not equal to zero then you can push the workflow in the previous step so that the wrong data may not be exported.

  For the Validation controls:
  According to your requirement.
  In the validation rules, go to the rule
  And in the tab-> display section rule... type: assets - shares - responsibility

  Then test rule and tick display test... it will show the difference in value.

  Then run the audit report show amount to test the display in the value column

  If your query is answered then
  Please mark as answer/useful

  J

• Complex "validation rule" using Java Bean code

  Hello
  
  I've never used with jdeveloper validation rules, but I need a complex validation rule to a column of my table.
  
  Can I put a 'validation rule' on an attribute of an object of display or on a column in a table, using the Bean code?
  
  My column must contain different values depending on the other columns in the table, so I think I can't do this without java code...
  
  I tried to doubleClick on column to create a validator, but I put a 'printing' inside and saw that running many times, but I want to run validation only when the value of the column change!
  
  How can I do this? What should I use?
  
  Kind regards
  Trigger

  Trigger,

  If you want to validate an attribute that is dependent on another attribute - you must upgrade the VO (or EO), not at the level of the attribute. You can write a validator method (which is a Java method) to achieve this. I don't think that nini will work for postings that depend on several attributes.

  John

• Cannot search the Dimension members in the Validation rules editor

  Dear all,
  
  I installed FDM + Foundation + HFM + Essbase + planning 11.1.1.3
  I stacked with the following problem:
  When I try to get the dimension members in the validation rules editor,
  I am - Web page message * 'data for this dimension not found' *
  I can't select the members here, I selected in activities-> map
  Can someone help me look for my existing members?
  
  Best regards
  Siarhei

  Hello

  Are you sure that you associate dimensions "VALxxxxx" in the workbench to your valid dimensions within Essbase?
  VAL dimensions are down at the bottom of the list of dimension for the adapter Essbase... and ValEntity, ValAccount, etc.

  Thank you

• Validation rule

  I wrote a validation rule in the FDM, but even if validation is FALSE data gets loaded into Essbase.
  
  Kindly help

  You can connect to the SQL or Oracle DATABASE schema that you have created to FDM. Now, you will find tables ("tdataseg" these tables contain data) you'll find the table that contains data you related.
  And no denormalization is required.

  Varun

• How to set a validation rule on a unique key formed by more than columns

  Hi all
  I use Jdeveloper 11.1.1.2
  I have a table with a column 3: col1, col2, col3. On that note, I have defined a unique key formed by col2 and col3.
  How can I define a validation rule on this key?
  In the entity object, I can't find anything useful, I see only attributes, but not the single key just defined (in the source of the entity object I have the code on the unique key).
  
  Thank you
  
  Andrea
  
  Published by: Andrea9 on February 11, 2010 03:46

  Yes, that's correct.

  You will realize that the approach set out in the Manual:

  (1) has a possibility to create duplicates (that is, you still need the unique key in the DB).

  (2) is slower (requires intermediate to read all values db at the intermediate level)

  You could, as Marie-Ange suggested to write the code as described in the post to blog as well - however, it has the same drawbacks.

  If you really need ID dups before validation, you will have to live with the disadvantages of the approach defined.

  Best,

  John

• Reusing the validation rule

  Gurus,
  
  We have a requirement in our project, where we need rules of reusable validatoin. Is there a way?
  
  Thank you

  Hello

  Yes it is. You must create a custom validation rule.

  To do this, select your project template and invoke the New Gallery.

  File-> new-> ADF business components-> Valdiation rule.

  Enter a name for your java class, and then click ok.

  In your class validateValue method, you can enter validation rules. Assume that you use the Tables Emp and you must validate if Ename is equal to "xyz".

  Then in the value of validate method:

   public boolean validateValue(Object value) {
  
          EntityImpl emp = (EntityImpl)value;
          if(emp.getAttribute("ename").toString().equals("xyz")){
              return true;
          }
          return false;
      }
  

  If you need a custom error message, you can:

      public void validate(JboValidatorContext ctx) {
          if (!validateValue(ctx.getNewValue())) {
              throw new ValidationException("project1.ValidationRuleImpl1 validation failed");
          }
      }
  

  Save your validation rule in the IDE:

  1. create an ADF library Jar out of your project file.
  2 deploy the library.
  3 call - tools-> preferences-> business components-> save the rules-> Pick library-> select your library that you have deployed and give it a name.

  Now whenever you call the rule validtion in flat EO Editor, dialog box you will see the rule below all of the other rules. It will be available in any project.

  Thank you.