Smart collection returns different results to the library filter?

Similar Questions

• query returns different results depends on the length of the day

  Hello!
  
  I have a query:
  
  

  INSERT /*+ APPEND */ INTO pwa_process (
  id,
  id_session,
  id_customer,
  s2k_account,
  service_seq_num,
  msisdn,
  id_tariff,
  contract_end_date,
  last_contract_date,
  next_available_contract_date,
  tariff_name,
  description,
  description_long,
  imei_old,
  activation_date,
  id_customer_number,
  arpu,
  value0,
  value1,
  value2,
  value3,
  value4,
  value5,
  id_pricing_plan)
  WITH msisdns AS (SELECT msisdn ms FROM customer_number cn
  JOIN customer_s2kaccount cs ON cn.s2k_account = cs.s2k_account AND cs.id_customer = v_customerId)
  SELECT
  seq_pwa_process.NEXTVAL,
  v_sessionId,
  customer_s2kaccount.id_customer,
  customer_s2kaccount.s2k_account,
  customer_number.service_seq_num,
  msisdn.msisdn,
  tariff.id,
  NVL(CASE WHEN date_contract_end IS NULL AND le_contract_end_date IS NOT NULL OR (date_contract_end < le_contract_end_date)
           THEN le_contract_end_date
           ELSE NVL(date_contract_end, ADD_MONTHS(customer_number.date_start, customer_number.ada_availability))
      END, TO_DATE('01.01.1970', 'DD.MM.YYYY')) contract_end_date,
  CASE WHEN NOT customer_number.date_first_activation IS NULL AND customer_number.date_first_activation >      (CASE WHEN ada_priority = 1 THEN ada_date_pwa
          WHEN ada_priority <> 1 AND (date_pwa IS NULL AND exchange_date IS NOT NULL OR date_pwa < exchange_date) 
          THEN exchange_date 
          ELSE date_pwa 
    END) 
       THEN customer_number.date_first_activation
       ELSE   (CASE WHEN ada_priority = 1 THEN ada_date_pwa
          WHEN ada_priority <> 1 AND (date_pwa IS NULL AND exchange_date IS NOT NULL OR date_pwa < exchange_date) 
          THEN exchange_date 
          ELSE date_pwa 
    END) 
  END last_contract_date,
  ADD_MONTHS(CASE WHEN NOT customer_number.date_first_activation IS NULL AND customer_number.date_first_activation > NVL(  (CASE WHEN ada_priority = 1 THEN ada_date_pwa
          WHEN ada_priority <> 1 AND (date_pwa IS NULL AND exchange_date IS NOT NULL OR date_pwa < exchange_date) 
          THEN exchange_date 
          ELSE date_pwa 
    END) ,
                                                                                                                         NVL(customer_number.date_first_activation, NVL(customer_number.date_start, customer_number.date_effective)))
                  THEN customer_number.date_first_activation
                  ELSE NVL(  (CASE WHEN ada_priority = 1 THEN ada_date_pwa
          WHEN ada_priority <> 1 AND (date_pwa IS NULL AND exchange_date IS NOT NULL OR date_pwa < exchange_date) 
          THEN exchange_date 
          ELSE date_pwa 
    END) , NVL(customer_number.date_first_activation, NVL(customer_number.date_start, customer_number.date_effective)))
             END, customer_number.ada_availability - DECODE(NVL(customer_number.current_contract_type, 0), 2, DECODE(customer_number.reduced_contract_used, 0, NVL(customer_number.el_contract_calculated_reduc,0), 0), 0)) next_available_contract_date,
  tariff.name_ada,
  DECODE(msisdn_group.def_column, 0, msisdn.value0, 1, msisdn.value1, 2, msisdn.value2, 3, msisdn.value3, 4, msisdn.value4, 5, msisdn.value5, msisdn.value0),
  msisdn.value0 || ';' || NVL(msisdn.value1, '') || ';' || NVL(msisdn.value2,'') || ';' || NVL(msisdn.value3,'') || ';' || NVL(msisdn.value4, '') || ';' || NVL(msisdn.value5, ''),
  customer_number.imei,
  NVL(customer_number.date_first_activation, NVL(customer_number.date_start, customer_number.date_effective)) date_start,
  customer_number.id,
  NVL(s2kaccount.arpu1,0),
  msisdn.value0,
  msisdn.value1,
  msisdn.value2,
  msisdn.value3,
  msisdn.value4,
  msisdn.value5,
  customer_number.id_pricing_plan
  FROM customer_s2kaccount
  JOIN customer_number ON customer_number.s2k_account = customer_s2kaccount.s2k_account AND customer_number.service_state = 'AB'
  JOIN msisdn ON msisdn.msisdn = customer_number.msisdn
  JOIN TABLE(CAST(v_tmp_table AS ADA.NUMBER_TABLE)) ids ON ids.column_value = msisdn.id
  JOIN msisdn_group ON msisdn_group.id = msisdn.id_msisdn_group
  JOIN pricing_plan ON pricing_plan.id = customer_number.id_pricing_plan AND pricing_plan.is_for_pwa = 1
  JOIN tariff ON tariff.name = pricing_plan.id
  JOIN s2kaccount ON s2kaccount.s2k_account = customer_number.s2k_account
  LEFT
  JOIN (SELECT msisdn, exchange_date, ADD_MONTHS(exchange_date, MAX(prolongation)) le_contract_end_date
  FROM loyalty_exchange a, msisdns
  WHERE a.msisdn = msisdns.ms AND exchange_date >= ALL (SELECT exchange_date FROM loyalty_exchange b WHERE b.msisdn = a.msisdn)
  GROUP BY msisdn, exchange_date) le ON le.msisdn = customer_number.msisdn
  WHERE customer_s2kaccount.id_customer = v_customerId;

  This query returns different results in the morning (09:00) and afternoon (16:00) on the same database for the same input data (I have prepared a script to test).
  Oracle 9.2.0.6 @solaris
  I checked the query plans, but they look the same in the morning and the afternoon. I don't know where to look for a problem/bug.
  Please help me with suggestions. is in bug with join ansi? or a left outer join?
  
  Published by: batonoff on February 16, 2009 16:56
  
  Published by: batonoff on February 16, 2009 16:58
  
  Published by: batonoff on February 16, 2009 17:00

  I recommend you post your declaration in the {} code tags (without the spaces) so that we can actually read.

  You are absolutely positive that nothing has changed on the data between when you run in the morning and in the afternoon?

• Why can I get two different results from the same coefficients?

  I get two different results of the evaluation of the polynomial function.

  For the first, I get the coefficients of a polynomial function to adapt.  I feed the coefficients of the function made the function Eval Poly and get the correct 12.8582 result when I evaluate 49940.

  For the second, I create constant array of values that have been returned by the polynomial Fit function (I typed in).  However, I get an incorrect result of - 120.7913 when I feed the constant table the function Eval Poly when I evauate 49940.

  How this can happen when I use the same values in table?

  A picture of what I explained is attached.

  Hi Altran,

  are you sure about using the 'same '?

  You compare them? Do you have (at least) set them to 17 digits display properties?

  Please attach a VI instead of an image...

• OBIEE logical column has same SQL but returns different results

  I have a SQL query with a case statement that returns the correct results by operating in Oracle SQL Developer. I've created several logical columns in OBIEE, one for each case in the original query. However, the results returned by each logical column OBIEE are radically different from the original SQL query results, even if the SQL code is virtually identical.

  For example, a column logical OBIEE that returns incorrect results contains the following SQL code:

  SUM (CASE when

  ("Registration - College". "" Effective colleges F. ("" Postal code "like '% a %') or

  ("Registration - College". "" Effective colleges F. ("" Postal code "like '%B %') or

  ("Registration - College". "" Effective colleges F. ("" Postal code "like '%c %') or

  ("Registration - College". "" Effective colleges F. ("" Postal code "like"% %") or

  ("Registration - College". "" Effective colleges F. ("" Postal code "like '%G %') or

  ("Registration - College". "" Effective colleges F. ("" Postal code "like"hour %") or

  ("Registration - College". "" Effective colleges F. ("" Postal code "like"%%J") or

  ("Registration - College". "" Effective colleges F. ("' Postal code ' like '%R %') or

  ("Registration - College". "" Effective colleges F. ("" Postal code "like '%s %') or

  ("Registration - College". "" Effective colleges F. ("" Postal code "like '%T %') or

  ("Registration - College". "" Effective colleges F. ("" Postal code "like"% %") or

  ("Registration - College". "" Effective colleges F. ("" Postal code "like '%x %') or

  ("Registration - College". "" Effective colleges F. ("' Postal code ' like '%Y %')

  THEN 0 OTHERWISE 1 END)

  The case statement in the original SQL query, which returns the correct results, is as follows:

  CASE

  WHEN (postal_zip_code_permanent like "%%K") or (postal_zip_code_permanent like '% %') or (postal_zip_code_permanent like '%m %') or (postal_zip_code_permanent like '%n %') or (postal_zip_code_permanent like "%p %") THEN "Ontario".

  WHEN (postal_zip_code_permanent like '% a %') or (postal_zip_code_permanent like '%B %') or (postal_zip_code_permanent like '%c %') or (postal_zip_code_permanent like '% %') or (postal_zip_code_permanent like '%G %') or (postal_zip_code_permanent like "%hour") or (postal_zip_code_permanent like "%%J") or (postal_zip_code_permanent like "%%R") or (postal_zip_code_permanent like '%s %') or (postal_zip_code_permanent like '%t %') or (postal_zip_code_permanent like '% %') or (postal_zip_ code_permanent like '%x %') or (postal_zip_code_permanent like "%%Y") THEN "Canada, other than Ontario.

  WHEN (substr(postal_zip_code_permanent,1,1) IN ('1 ', '2', '3', '4', '5', '6' ', 7',' 8 ', ' 9',' 0') or (postal_zip_code_permanent like '%d %') or (postal_zip_code_permanent like '%f %') or (postal_zip_code_permanent like ' % I %') or (postal_zip_code_permanent like "% O") or (postal_zip_code_permanent like "%%Q") or (postal_zip_code_permanent like "%%U") or (postal_zip_code_permanent like ' % W ') or (postal_zip_code_permanent like "%%Z")) THEN 'other')

  WHEN (postal_zip_code_permanent like '% + %') or (postal_zip_code_permanent like '%. %') or (postal_zip_code_permanent like ' %? %') or (postal_zip_code_permanent like '% %') or postal_zip_code_permanent IN ('+ ','.', '?)) (',',') And THEN "Invalid."

  WHEN postal_zip_code_permanent is null THEN 'Blank '.

  Of OTHER postal_zip_code_permanent

  END

  Now I see what the problem was. In the original SQL query, each condition is exclusive, for each record will only be categorized in one of the scenarios WHEN. But in OBIEE, each logical column is autonomous, so some records were classified into more than logical column, even if each logical column was supposed to be exclusive.

• SQL query return different result 11 GR 1 material and GR 11, 2

  Problem: SQL returns different results in 11 GR 1 material and GR 11, 2 games.

  Example script:

  create the table tab_main
  (
  SOS number (2) not null,
  contract number (2) null
  )
  /

  create the table tab_sub
  (
  number (2) of contract non-null,.
  SOS number (2) null
  )
  /

  insert into tab_main values (1, 10);
  insert into tab_main values (2, 20);
  insert into tab_main values (3, null);
  insert into tab_main values (4, null);

  insert into tab_sub values (1, 10);
  insert into tab_sub (20, 2) values;
  commit;

  The SQL code:

  SELECT *.
  OF tab_main.
  tab_sub
  WHERE tab_main.sos = tab_sub.sos (+) AND
  tab_main. Contract = tab_sub.contract (+) and
  tab_main. Contract not in (select 1 of the double);

  The above query gives more results
  -by 11.2.0.4
  1 10 10 1
  2 20 20 2
  

  -in 11.1.0.7
  1 10 10 1
  2 20 20 2
  4
  3

  
  Please tell us what could be the reason for the behaviour of offset lines thie.

  
  Thank you

  Piesset
  
  

  I think it is probably a bug in 11.1.0.7 (and possibly other versions), I get the same results as your 11.2.0.4 9.2.0.7, 10.2.0.3 and 11.2.0.3, and this is the result, I expect.

  Your not in the paragraph is equivalent to:

  SELECT *.

  OF tab_main, tab_sub

  WHERE tab_main.sos = tab_sub.sos (+) AND

  tab_main. Contract = tab_sub.contract (+) and

  tab_main. Contract <> 1;

  Since you have null values in tab_main.contract they are lost by the predicate since null = value is never true (or false).

  John

• Different results of the property 'configManager.snmpSystem' of HostSystem executing vCenter and when run directly from host

  We are seeing different results for the property of the HostSystem 'configManager. snmpSystem' from vCenter and when you access from host.

  I think that the result should be no different. Is this another known issue or am I missing something here?

  To confirm this behavior, we tried to show the property to the host through the Explorer managed objects (MOB) and also by the VMware Remote CLI scripts. Join the results of the CLI script that was running on our test systems.

  Best regards

  Damodar

  Greetings, I just wanted you guys to know this problem that you are experiencing is a known problem with VMware and our engineers groups are working on it.    Sorry for the inconvenience to you.

• Calculations to return different results depending on the responsibility

  Hello
  
  We have a report that uses a PL/SQL function in a calculation.
  
  When a single responsibility runs the report, the calculation returns figures empty or incorrect.
  
  When another executes it, it works fine.
  
  When the function is created, are there grants that must be given to ensure that all responsibilities can use this?
  
  All the responsibilities have access to the data in the application.
  
  The service is owned by APPS and it was registered in the EUL.
  
  Also, there seems to be a difference in if this is executed from SSO launch Viewer or office.
  
  Kind regards
  
  Rachael

  Hello

  Your basic problem is that you have

  EXCEPTION
  while others then
  return sqlcode;

  at the end of your code. This means that if an error occurs when you run the function it will be completed successfully, but with some bad days.

  With this exception handling it is difficult to know what you encounter the error, but it could be a problem of access to the tables or type conversion problem.

  Rod West

• Different results from the the DLL source code

  Hi all

  I'm new to this forum and also to labview so understandable...

  Then, I got a source project with many under vi of that graphic plots of excel files. I also got the exe after generation.

  The problem is, if I try to compile this project again, the exe gives me different results than what I already have. They should be the same, because I does no update in the source code.

  Can someone explain this behavior? I don't know anything about how it has been made because the guy who create this left the office... I need to make a few updates, but first of all, I have to build corectly.

  Thank you

  Have you compared the date of the exe file with the date of the source code? Are you absolutely sure that no changes have been made to the source code after the build? The construction specifications are part of the project. Unless you changed something there, builds should be the same.

  You have the source code control? Issues like this should not be a if you make and use wisely.

• photos disappear from collection but still present in the library.  Book a contour picture and text but no pictures.

  My hard drive crashed and had to be replaced.  The hard drive contents were saved.   When I try to use my previous catalogs present on the c drive and a backup disk, I can see the files in the library but the collection has no pictures.  The collection shows the number of files it contains, but they cannot be seen.   When you click on the collection, I see a preview of the photo and the text of the photo but no picture.

  My face is red.  I have not noticed these brands.  Why are still pictures in the main library and not in the collection.  Of course, there is a break but why?  Looks like I'll have to live with it and track each photo individually.   Thank you very much for your help

• Different results from the "auto levels" in LR and PS

  I use LR + PS CC 2015 (latest versions).

  When you change the same photo into LR and PS (open in LR) and do a "leveling car" ("automatic Tonwertkorrektur") LR into PS Camera Raw Filter exposure settings, contrast, lighting,... are almost all different. And: the Visual result is more beautiful in PS - but I want to make fundamental changes in LR due to bulk editing capabilities.

  My question now is: why is it different? What is should not be the same algorithms in LR and PS because they both use ACR in the background?

  Or make me a different configuration for LR and PS?

  I'm stuck...

  MGo wrote:

  Strange, that is what it looks like to me the PS ACR:

  

  I don't have the camera profile selection box - as I have in LR...

  Yes, you are missing the "Camera profile" selector (Kameraprofil). I never saw that happen with the English language setting. You open a camera raw file? Only camera raw and converted DNG camera raw files will have camera profile selections. All other file formats will only show "Embedded" (Eingebettet). Perhaps with the language German selection it does not at all appear with formats JPEG, TIFF, etc. file formats?

  I suggest you post this question in the forum Photoshop here: General Photoshop Discussion

  

• Different exhibition in the library and develop Modules

  I am new to lightroom, but have spent a lot of time playing with Lr and Googling trying to solve this one

  I always tried to Lr2015cc and am currently on the latest 2015.2.1

  Question has existed with original version-1st downloaded, installed in August 2015

  Camera Nikon D750

  When you export to JPEG image has the same appearance as the rendering in the library Module - with the help of the external viewer for the file exported

  This creates problems as the develop module, is where you can make the adjustments most of development

  In general library module is overexposed and overly yellow compared to the develop Module

  This problem occurs with both files JPEG and NEF (Raw) files and is not unique to the files of a camera

  Other users I've talked to have not reported a difference bewteen visible 2 modules? old version of the software if

  I am aware that I look at the preview images when using RAW files

  It is very difficult to develop pictures when what you see is not what you get export

  While I will be material calibrate my monitor soon it clearly isn't a fix for this problem that I do the comparisons on the same screen

  I can only assume that this is a recent bug that there is no obvious reason to have 2 different renderings of the image

  Anyone solved the problem? Is put there I missed? Is there a solution?

  While I will be material to calibrate my monitor soon

  Go ahead and do it now, you probably have a broken monitor profile.

  As troubleshooting and as a temporary solution, you can set the monitor to sRGB profile.

  If the problem disappears, the monitor profile is the problem.

• dbms_sqlhash and online md5 calculator return different results

  Does anyone know how dbms_sqlhash.gethash () works?
  I get the same result for string 123456.
  Md5 (http://md5-hash-online.waraxe.us/) online calculator returns e10adc3949ba59abbe56e057f20f883e.
  DBMS_SQLHASH. GETHASH() returns 7E8FEB2276322ECDDD4423B649DFD4D9.
  

  --the second parameter value 2 means MD5 hash.
  select DBMS_SQLHASH.GETHASH('select 123456 from dual',2) from dual;

  Hello
  >
  I get the same result for string 123456.
  Md5 (http://md5-hash-online.waraxe.us/) online calculator returns e10adc3949ba59abbe56e057f20f883e.
  DBMS_SQLHASH. GETHASH() returns 7E8FEB2276322ECDDD4423B649DFD4D9.

  --the second parameter value 2 means MD5 hash.
  select DBMS_SQLHASH.GETHASH('select 123456 from dual',2) from dual;
  

  DBMS_SQLHASH. GETHASH returns the hash of the SQL statement in the first parameter Select 123456 of double, not 123456

  To get the MD5 hash of the 123456 you should use DBMS_OBFUSCATION_TOOLKIT or DBMS_CRYPTO packages. The latest is preferable and more recent.

  Kind regards

• Different results from the same calculations between SQL and PL/SQL

  This SQL statement:

  select 1074 * (4 / 48) from dual;

  Gives the 89.5 result.
  However this PL/SQL block

  declare
      tmp     NUMBER;
  begin
      SELECT 1074 * (4 / 48) into tmp from dual;
      dbms_output.put_line('Result '||tmp);
  end;

  Gives a different result:
  Result 89.49999999999999999999999999999999999996
  
  If I change and give my variable tmp, a precision and scale, (38.36) say the result is 89.5.
  
  Ed. I did about 10g (10.2.0.4.0) and 11g (11.1.0.7.0) with the same result in both.
  
  Published by: kendenny on July 9, 2010 10:19 for more information

  What is your current value of NUMLARGEUR in SQL * more (I assume that you use as your tool)?

  SQL> set numwidth 50
  SQL> select 1074 * (4 / 48) from dual;
  
                                         1074*(4/48)
  --------------------------------------------------
           89.49999999999999999999999999999999999996
  

• Open picture in lightroom completely different cc in the library and develop modules

  The image to import into the library is very well.

  

  But when I click on develop module to looks like this:

  

  I will try the demo version of LR CC, think about upgrading LR 4. I've never had this problem before. What I am doing wrong?

  Press enter too early...

  In addition, please disable the GPU acceleration: https://helpx.adobe.com/lightroom/kb/lightroom-gpu-faq.html

• Different results, running the same Javascript - CC vs CS6

  I am having some problems affecting the font size of a text using Javascript. For some reason, I always get characters of 2.88 points as opposed to what I put it to (in this case, it's 12). Anyone know what is the problem that the PS is not recognizing the command to set the font size here and why?

  #9740928-Pastie

  Line 42 is where I'll put the size.

  Line 27, that's where the variable is defined. I tried just punching in an integer with the same results.

  Thanks for any help.

  
  

  So I think that there could be a problem with Adobe CC or maybe some changes in its development with regard to the way he treats the Javascript. I ran several tests today and did some reading. At the end of the line, I decided to try the script on CS6 and I got the correct results. The script works on CS6, but not cc? I made an example of script I did my tests to take a pic to Adobe team. It's the end of this post.

  
  

  I'm not the master script by any stretch of the imagination, but I find it odd that this script works correctly on Adobe CS6, but does not change the size of font correctly on Adobe CC. I expect that same results. If any of you come up with anything please let me know. Cheers.

  BEGINNING OF THE SCRIPT

  var defaultRulerUnits = preferences.rulerUnits;

  preferences.rulerUnits = Units.PIXELS;

  var AD = activeDocument;

  Size = 53;

  var TextLayer = AD.artLayers.add ();

  TextLayer.kind = LayerKind.TEXT;

  TextLayer.opacity = 90;

  var txtRef = TextLayer.textItem;

  txtRef.font = "Impact."

  txtRef.contents = size;  The size of 53 is reflected in CS6, but when this script is run on CC, is not. Sometimes 12, sometimes it is 2.88.

  txtRef.size = size;

  END OF SCRIPT

  ^ I save it as a. JS

  
  

  Post edited by: Clayton Krause

  The ruin of font size of DOM somewhere in 2014 of the CC is a known problem.

  Re: Do you have CC 2014.2 break textItem.size?

  The alternative would use code AM.