SQL Query search line differences

Similar Questions

• Write a SQL query with lines in columns

  All the

  I need help in writing a SQL query with lines in columns, let give u an example...

  drop table activity;

  CREATE TABLE 'ACTIVITY '.

  (

  "PROJECT_WID" NUMBER (22.0) NOT NULL,

  VARCHAR2 (150 CHAR) "PROJECT_NO."

  VARCHAR2 (800 CHAR) 'NAME '.

  );

  Insert in the ACTIVITY (PROJECT_WID, PROJECT_NO, NAME) values (1683691, '10007', 12-121');

  Insert in the ACTIVITY (PROJECT_WID, PROJECT_NO, NAME) values (1684994, '10008', 12-122');

  Insert in the ACTIVITY (PROJECT_WID, PROJECT_NO, NAME) values (1686296, '10009', 12-123');

  Insert in the ACTIVITY (PROJECT_WID, PROJECT_NO, NAME) values (2225222, '9040', 12-124');

  drop table lonet;

  CREATE TABLE 'LONET.

  (

  VARCHAR2 (150 CHAR) "NAME."

  NUMBER OF THE "ROOT."

  VARCHAR2 (150 CHAR) "ENTRYVALUE".

  );

  INSERT INTO LONET (NAME, ROOT, ENTRYVALUE) VALUES ("GAC", 1683691, "LDE");

  INSERT INTO LONET (NAME, ROOT, ENTRYVALUE) VALUES ('NAM', 1683691, 'LME');

  INSERT INTO LONET (NAME, ROOT, ENTRYVALUE) VALUES ('BAG', 1683691, 'ICE');

  INSERT INTO LONET (NAME, ROOT, ENTRYVALUE) VALUES ('PAP', 1683691, 'IKE');

  INSERT INTO LONET (NAME, ROOT, ENTRYVALUE) VALUES ('NAM', 1686291, "QTY");

  INSERT INTO LONET (NAME, ROOT, ENTRYVALUE) VALUES ('PAP', 1686291, 'MAX');

  INSERT INTO LONET (NAME, ROOT, ENTRYVALUE) VALUES ("GAC", 1684994, "MTE");

  INSERT INTO LONET (NAME, ROOT, ENTRYVALUE) VALUES ('PAP', 1684994, 'MAC');

  INSERT INTO LONET (NAME, ROOT, ENTRYVALUE) VALUES ('FMT', 1684994, 'NICE');

  INSERT INTO LONET (NAME, ROOT, ENTRYVALUE) VALUES ('FMR', 1684994, 'RAY');

  INSERT INTO LONET (NAME, ROOT, ENTRYVALUE) VALUES ('BAG', 1686296, "CAQ");

  INSERT INTO LONET (NAME, ROOT, ENTRYVALUE) VALUES ("PAP", 1686296, "QAQ");

  INSERT INTO LONET (NAME, ROOT, ENTRYVALUE) VALUES ("VANESSA", 1686296, "THEW");

  INSERT INTO LONET (NAME, ROOT, ENTRYVALUE) VALUES ("ANDR", 1686296, "REYL");

  commit;

  Link: activity.project_wid = lonet.root

  look like output

  Project_wid	Project_no	NAME	GAC	NAM	BAG	RAC
  1683691	10007	12-121	LDE	LME	LCE	LKE
  1684994	10008	12-122	MTE	null	null	MAC
  1686296	10009	12-123	null	null	CAQ	QAQ
  2225222	9040	12-124	null	null	null	null

  two problems, in that I am running

  1. I dono how simply we can convert rows to columns

  2. for root = 1683691, there are double NAM and RAC in lonet table... ideally these data should not be there, but since its here, we can take a MAX so that it returns a value

  3. There are undesirables who should be ignored

  Once again my thought process is that we join the activity and 4 alias table lonet.

  ask for your help in this

  Thank you

  Hello

  This is called pivoting.

  Here's a way to do it:

  WITH relevant_data AS

  (

  SELECT a.project_wid, a.project_no, b.SID

  , l.name AS lonet_name, l.entryvalue

  Activity one

  LEFT OUTER JOIN lonet l.root = a.project_wid l

  )

  SELECT *.

  OF relevant_data

  PIVOT (MAX (entryvalue)

  FOR lonet_name IN ("GAC" IN the gac

  "NAM" AS nam

  'BAG' IN the bag

  "RAC" AS cars

  )

  )

  ORDER BY project_wid

  ;

  Output:

  PROJECT_WID PROJECT_NO GAC NAM BAG RAC NAME

  ----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

  1683691 12 - 10007 121 LDE LME LCE LKE

  1684994 MAC MTE 10008 12-122

  1686296 12 - 10009 123 QAC QAQ

  2225222 9040 12 - 124

  To learn more about swivel, see the FAQ in the Forum: Re: 4. How can I convert rows to columns?

  Thanks for posting the CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements; It's very useful!

• Report of update SQL query with line selector. Update process.

  I have a report of update SQL query with the selectors in line.
  How to identify line selector in a process update on the page.
  
  I want to update some columns with a value of an area of selection on the page.
  
  With the help of the base:
  
  UPDATE table_name
  SET Column1 = value
  WHERE some_column = some_value
  
  I would need to do:
  
  UPDATE table_name
  SET column1 =: P1_select
  WHERE [line selector] =?
  
  Now sure how to identify [line selector] and/or validate it is checked.
  Thank you
  Bob

  Identify the name of the checkbox of the source of the page element, it should be of the fxx format (f01, f02... f50).
  Suppose that we f01.

  for i in 1 .. apex_application.g_f01.count
  loop
    UPDATE CONTRACTS
    SET SIP_LOAD_FLAG = :P16_STATUS
    where  =  apex_application.g_f01(i); --i'th checked record' primary key
  end loop;
  

• (Editable report) SQL query with line selector

  I used this code to get the update of the records in a query SQL (editable report).
  Updates a value in a selection box.
  
  because me in 1... apex_application.g_f01. Count
  loop
  UPDATE CONTRACTS
  SET LOAD_FLAG =: P8_SELECT
  WHERE ID = apex_application.g_f01 (i); -i'the checked the file 'primary key '.
  end loop;
  
  Here's my dilemma.
  Line selector seems to be in a fixed position.
  By linking the line for identification number selector (1, 2, 3, etc.)
  Sort by ID (1, 2, 3, etc.)
  

  It works perfectly, as long as the ID is sorted in order. < <

  If it is sorted by another field with say ID 29 now in the 1st row, by checking the box and update, you update ID #1 located elsewhere on the page.
  Any ideas how to make the line selector literally equal to the line, it is displayed in?
  Thank you
  Bob

  I think I have an idea of what is wrong and, eventually, how to fix it. Try this:

  make your field primary key (NO ROWID!) in a column in a table column, either through the "wizard" (i.e. through the report attributes screen), or using the APEX_ITEM api (as described by Vee). I often have my primary key as a hidden; If you really need to see it, you can use "DISPLAY_AND_SAVE".

  So if your primary key 'ID' colum is now in the 2nd table as a table (i.e. f02 - adjust accordingly!), your PL/SQL process should look like this:

  for i in 1 .. apex_application.g_f01.count
  loop
     UPDATE CONTRACTS
        SET LOAD_FLAG = :P8_SELECT
      where ID = apex_application.g_f02(apex_application.g_f01(i)); 
  
  end loop;
  

  It of a little confusing at first but it it makes sense when you train how tabular tables work with check boxes. The length of this array represents only what is verified - so if you have 3 values checked, the cardinality of the table in a particular table 3. On the other hand, your other tabular berries (containing the 'normal' values) has a cardinality of the count of all the visible lines.

  In this case, the record selector (F01) contains the ID of the relevant line in your report - so passing this value in the array index 2 (F02) should give you the correct primary key for that particular line value. If you subsequently order the report by another field, it should work again.

  I should add that Vee method will work well - the difference is that, instead of organizing the rowid, f01 contains the actual key value. Hope this helps

  Published by: Joel_C on March 21, 2011 11:50

• SQL query - SEARCH

  I use 4.0.27 - version of SQL Standard and I can't seem to execute search commands. I tried contains freetext, and a few others I found here and there. If someone could help me on some search commands, maybe I'm the wrong syntax or something. For the moment, I have this:
  
  SELECT *.
  QUIZ
  WHEN FREETEXT (TITLE, "SQL");
  
  The query does not work, I don't know if it was a problem with the clause of research I would get a result of 0 isn't it, thought it might be related to my SQL version put so into it at the beginning.
  
  Thanks for your help guys!

  slowpoke115 wrote:
  > I use 4.0.27 - version of SQL Standard

  There is no such thing. Do you mean MySQL 4.0.27?

  > I tried contains freetext, and a few others that I found here and
  > it.

  Different databases use slightly different SQL dialects, so you must
  to use the correct syntax. If you mean MySQL, none of the foregoing be
  work.

  > SELECT *.
  > QUIZ
  > WHERE FREETEXT (TITLE, "SQL");

  In MySQL, this would be written like this:

  SELECT * QUIZ
  WHERE TITLE LIKE '% SQL % '.

  On non-windows servers, MySQL is case sensitive with respect to the database,
  the names of table and column, so make sure that you use the
  combination of capital and small letters (is the table QUIZ, quiz, or quiz)?

  --
  Adobe Community Expert David Powers
  Author, "Foundation PHP for Dreamweaver 8" (friends of ED)
  Author, "PHP Solutions" (friends of ED)
  http://foundationphp.com/

• SQL query problem finding difference in documents

  Hi all
  I use oracle 10g. I need emergency aid to find the difference in documents based on the date:
  
  I have sales of the table as below:
  
  seller SALES_COUNT DATE
  JOHN 20 04/01/2012
  DENNY 15 04/01/2012
  JOHN 30 04/02/2012
  DENNY 30 04/02/2012
  JOHN 45 04/03/2012
  DENNY 50 04/03/2012
  
  
  SALES_COUNT is up to man including the date of sale. Its similar cumulative number. John has total sales of 01/04/2012 to 03/04/2012 is 50 and same case for Denny. This SALES_COUNT will keep increasing with dates as sales continue to add in the table for each salesperson.
  But I want to have seprate for each seller counties.
  for example: JOHN SALES_COUNT 04/02/2012 is 30-20 = 10
  JOHN SALES_COUNT 03/04/2012 is 45-30 = 15
  DENNY SALES_COUNT, 02/04/2012 is 30-15 = 15
  JOHN SALES_COUNT 03/04/2012 is 50-30 = 20
  
  Please help me with this scenario and let me know if you need clarification. I would much appreciate your help.
  
  Thank you.

  This gives you what you want?

  with t as (
       select 'JOHN' salesman, 20 sales_count, to_date('04/01/2012', 'mm/dd/yyyy') sale_date from dual
       union all
       select 'DENNY' salesman, 15 sales_count, to_date('04/01/2012', 'mm/dd/yyyy') sale_date from dual
       union all
       select 'JOHN' salesman, 30 sales_count, to_date('04/02/2012', 'mm/dd/yyyy') sale_date from dual
       union all
       select 'DENNY' salesman, 30 sales_count, to_date('04/02/2012', 'mm/dd/yyyy') sale_date from dual
       union all
       select 'JOHN' salesman, 45 sales_count, to_date('04/03/2012', 'mm/dd/yyyy') sale_date from dual
       union all
       select 'DENNY' salesman, 50 sales_count, to_date('04/03/2012', 'mm/dd/yyyy') sale_date from dual
  )
  select salesman,
         sales_count sales_todate,
         sale_date,
         sales_count - lag(sales_count, 1, 0) over (partition by salesman order by sale_date) daily_sales
  from t
  
  SALESMAN,SALES_TODATE,SALE_DATE,DAILY_SALES
  DENNY,15,4/1/2012,15
  DENNY,30,4/2/2012,15
  DENNY,50,4/3/2012,20
  JOHN,20,4/1/2012,20
  JOHN,30,4/2/2012,10
  JOHN,45,4/3/2012,15
        
  

• SQl query to find out time between the different lines of transactions

  (See both images from an attachment to get the clear picture of the data and understand the question correctly.)

  I have a set of data like this in one of my paintings. (This is a simple representation of the original data.)

  Reference table1.jpg

  Id        | Type               | Value | Start_date | End_date

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  ZTR0098 | ALLOW | 0 | 1 JUN | 2 JUN |

  ZTR0098 | ADTAX | 0 | 1 JUN | 2 JUN |

  ZTR0098 | MXTAX | 0 | 1 JUN | 9 JUN |

  ZTR0098 | ALLOW | 4. 3 JUN | 15 JUN |

  ZTR0098 | ADTAX | 44.00 | 3 JUN | 17-JUNE |

  ZTR0098 | MXTAX | 2. 10 JUN | 17-JUNE |

  ZTR0098 | ALLOW | 5. 16-JUNE | 20 JUN |

  ZTR0098 | ADTAX | 55,34 | 18 JUN | 22 JUN |

  ZTR0098 | MXTAX | 1. 18 JUN | 25 JUN |

  ZTR0098 | MXTAX | 6. 26 JUN | 31 AUG |

  ZTR0098 | ADTAX | 20.09. 23 JUN | 23 JUL |

  ZTR0098 | ALLOW | 8. 21 JUN | 31 AUG |

  ZTR0098 | ADTAX | 45. 24 JUL | 31 AUG |

  each line has a type and a rasthaus id to it. ID belongs to other parent tables. the value of each type is given, and the validity of each value is followed by a field start_date and end_date.

  All values start from 1 - JUN and expires on 31 - AUG. Now my requirement is to obtain a report that gives three columns for three different types (ALLOW, ADTAX and MXTAX) with combination of unique values in the effective time interval. Let me put the result below.

  Reference table2.jpg

  Id         | ALLOW | ADTAX | MXTAX |  Start_date | End_date

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  ZTR0098 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 JUN | 2 JUN |

  ZTR0098 | 4. 44.00 | 0 | 3 JUN | 9 JUN |

  ZTR0098 | 4. 44.00 | 2. 10 JUN | 15 JUN |

  ZTR0098 | 5. 44.00 | 2. 16-JUNE | 17-JUNE |

  ZTR0098 | 5. 55,34 | 1. 18 JUN | 20 JUN |

  ZTR0098 | 8. 55,34 | 1. 21 JUN | 22 JUN |

  ZTR0098 | 8. 20.09. 1. 23 JUN | 25 JUN |

  ZTR0098 | 8. 20.09. 6. 26 JUN | 23 JUL |

  ZTR0098 | 8. 45. 6. 23 JUL | 31 AUG |

  As you can see there are no duplicate rows for a combination of (ALLOW, ADTAX and MXTAX) with their respective dates in force. resulting in the above table. the first step is to convert lines to the column which is pretty obvious to do that by grouping on start_date and end_date colum, but the real deal is the time interval during which the combination of the values (ALLOW, ADTAX, and MXTAX) has remained constant.

  I wrote under query using Group by.

  Select

  ID,

  NVL (max (decode (type, "ALLOW", value)), 0) as ALLOW

  NVL (max (decode (type, 'ADTAX', value)), 0) as ADTAX

  NVL (max (decode (type, 'MXTAX', value)), 0) as MXTAX

  Start_date,

  End_date

  from my_table

  Group of start_date, end_date, id

  start_date, end_date

  the results it gives are like this:

  Reference table3.jpg

  Id       | ALLOW | ADTAX | MXTAX |  Start_date | End_date

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  ZTR0098 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 JUN | 2 JUN |

  ZTR0098 | 0 | 0 | 2. 1 JUN | 9 JUN |

  ZTR0098 | 4. 0 | 0 | 3 JUN | 15 JUN |

  ZTR0098 | 0 | 44.00 | 0 | 3 JUN | 17-JUNE |

  ZTR0098 | 0 | 0 | 2. 10 JUN | 17-JUNE |

  ZTR0098 | 5. 0 | 0 | 16-JUNE | 20 JUN |

  ZTR0098 | 0 | 55,34 | 0 | 18 JUN | 22 JUN |

  .   .

  . .

  like wise

  but I'm not able to determine the time intervals by using the SQL query.

  with

  Table1 as

  (select the id 'ZTR0098', 'ALLOW' type, 0 val, to_date('1-JUN','dd-MON') start_date, end_date Union to_date('2-JUN','dd-MON') double all the)

  Select 'ZTR0098', 'ADTAX', 0, to_date('1-JUN','dd-MON'), to_date('2-JUN','dd-MON') of all the double union

  Select 'ZTR0098', 'MXTAX', 0, to_date('1-JUN','dd-MON'), to_date('9-JUN','dd-MON') of all the double union

  Select 'ZTR0098', 'ALLOW', 4, to_date('3-JUN','dd-MON'), to_date('15-JUN','dd-MON') of all the double union

  Select 'ZTR0098', 'ADTAX', 44.00, to_date('3-JUN','dd-MON'), to_date('17-JUN','dd-MON') of all the double union

  Select 'ZTR0098', 'MXTAX', 2, to_date('10-JUN','dd-MON'), to_date('17-JUN','dd-MON') of all the double union

  Select 'ZTR0098', 'ALLOW', 5, to_date('16-JUN','dd-MON'), to_date('20-JUN','dd-MON') of all the double union

  Select 'ZTR0098', 'ADTAX', 55.34, to_date('18-JUN','dd-MON'), to_date('22-JUN','dd-MON') of all the double union

  Select 'ZTR0098', 'MXTAX', 1, to_date('18-JUN','dd-MON'), to_date('25-JUN','dd-MON') of all the double union

  Select 'ZTR0098', 'MXTAX', 6, to_date('26-JUN','dd-MON'), to_date('31-AUG','dd-MON') of all the double union

  Select 'ZTR0098', 'ADTAX', 20.09, to_date('23-JUN','dd-MON'), to_date('23-JUL','dd-MON') of all the double union

  Select 'ZTR0098', 'ALLOW', 8, to_date('21-JUN','dd-MON'), to_date('31-AUG','dd-MON') of all the double union

  Select 'ZTR0098', 'ADTAX', 45, to_date('24-JUL','dd-MON'), to_date('31-AUG','dd-MON') of the double

  ),

  days like

  (select level - 1 dte + to_date('1-JUN','dd-MON')

  of the double

  connect by level<= to_date('31-aug','dd-mon')="" -="" to_date('1-jun','dd-mon')="" +="">

  )

  Select id, allow, adtax, mxtax, min (dte) start_date, max (dte) end_date

  (select ID, dte, max (allow) allow, max (adtax) adtax, max (mxtax) mxtax,

  ROW_NUMBER() over (order by dte) row_number() - courses (partition by order max (allow), max (adtax), max (mxtax) by dte) gr

  go (select id, dte,

  -case when type = 'ALLOW' and dte between start_date and end_date then end val 0 otherwise allow.

  -case when type = "ADTAX" and dte between start_date and end_date then val 0 otherwise end adtax.

  -case when type = "MXTAX" and dte between start_date and end_date then val 0 otherwise end mxtax

  Table 1 t,

  days d

  where d.dte between t.start_date and t.end_date

  )

  Group by id, dte

  )

  Group by id, gr, allow, adtax, mxtax

  order by id, gr

  ID	ALLOW	ADTAX	MXTAX	START_DATE	END_DATE
  ZTR0098	0	0	0	01/06/2015	02/06/2015
  ZTR0098	4	44	0	03/06/2015	09/06/2015
  ZTR0098	4	44	2	10/06/2015	15/06/2015
  ZTR0098	5	44	2	16/06/2015	17/06/2015
  ZTR0098	5	55,34	1	18/06/2015	20/06/2015
  ZTR0098	8	55,34	1	21/06/2015	22/06/2015
  ZTR0098	8	20.09	1	23/06/2015	25/06/2015
  ZTR0098	8	20.09	6	26/06/2015	23/07/2015
  ZTR0098	8	45	6	24/07/2015	31/08/2015

  Concerning

  Etbin

• A map of OWB (service line) SQL query

  If I trace a session, run a map OWB (base line), the trace file contains the actual SQL query?

  The problem with me is that when I execute this rank - based OWB card, is throw me an error CursorFetchMapTerminationRTV20007, BUT (most time consuming) when I take on the intermediate SQL insert query, it works very well (and also in a very short time)

  The executing State = COMPLETE

  message = text ORA-06502: PL/SQL: digital or value error: character string buffer too small

  CursorFetchMapTerminationRTV20007 = message text

  N ° of task errors = 0

  N ° task warnings = 2

  N ° errors = 1

  Since this card OWB (truncate insert) is the line in function of where I can't back-end of the generated pl/sql package request OWB so I was wondering if I trace the session, check the trace file, maybe I'll able to see the exact SQL query generated. But I wanted to confirm the same.

  Yes, the real run SQL in session will be in the trace file.

• CFGFWK-60850: the Test failed! CFGFWK-60853: A connection to the database, but no lines have been returned to the examination of the SQL query.

  Hi all..

  It's SOA 11.1.1.7... I created the schema and storage via RCU but when I try to configure JDBS schema components... his throw this error:

  CFGFWK-60850: the Test failed!

  CFGFWK-60853: A connection to the database, but no lines have been returned to the examination of the SQL query.

  I created 3 users of UCR and who were all successful, because I have no error... of these three alone is managed in the configuration tree SOA...

  No idea why like that...

  Thank you

  Aerts

  This that I solved it by installing EMP 11.1.2.2 with UCR and SOA 11.1.1.6...

• SQL query returns no row vs. multiple lines

  Hello
  
  I am trying to get the result of a simple sql query,
  If there is no row returned, he would have "No. ROWS" in the result set.
  Other wise all the rows containing data is necessary.
  
  Let me know how this could be achieved. Under query works for the latter and not first case as mentioned below
  
  OUTPUT
  
  + (box 1) when we use B_ID = 123456 +.
  
  IDS
  -----
  'NO LINE '.
  
  + (box 2) when we use B_ID = 12345 +.
  IDS
  -----
  1 11112345
  2 22212345
  

  create table TEMP_AAA
  (
    A_ID VARCHAR2(10),
    B_ID VARCHAR2(10)
  )
  
  INSERT INTO TEMP_AAA(A_ID,B_ID) VALUES('111','12345');
  INSERT INTO TEMP_AAA(A_ID,B_ID) VALUES('222','12345');
  INSERT INTO TEMP_AAA(A_ID,B_ID) VALUES('333','12000');
  INSERT INTO TEMP_AAA(A_ID,B_ID) VALUES('444','10000');

  WITH 
  MATCH_ROWS AS
  (
         SELECT A_ID||B_ID IDS FROM TEMP_AAA WHERE B_ID=12345
  ),
  
  MATCH_ROW_COUNT AS
  (
         SELECT COUNT(1) AS COUNTS FROM MATCH_ROWS
  ),
  
  PROCESSED_ROWS AS
  (
         SELECT
               CASE WHEN COUNTS = 0
                    THEN 
                     (SELECT NVL((SELECT IDS FROM TEMP_AAA WHERE B_ID=12345),'NO ROWS') IDS FROM DUAL)
                    ELSE
                     MATCH_ROWS.IDS
               END IDS     
          FROM MATCH_ROWS,MATCH_ROW_COUNT
  )
  
  SELECT * FROM PROCESSED_ROWS;

  Hello

  I think you want to put this on a report or something. I have what would be easier to do this logic there. But if you want that this is possible.
  Like this

  with
  temp_aaa as
  (select '111' a_id ,'12345' b_id from dual union all
  select '222'      ,'12345'  from dual union all
  select '333'      ,'12000'  from dual union all
  select '444'      ,'10000'  from dual
  )
  , wanted_rows as
  ( select  '123456' B_ID from dual)
  select
    temp_aaa.A_ID || temp_aaa.B_ID IDS 
  
  from
    temp_aaa
    ,wanted_rows
  where
    temp_aaa.b_id = wanted_rows.b_id
  union all
  select
    'NO ROWS'
  FROM
    DUAL
  WHERE
    (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM TEMP_AAA, wanted_rows WHERE TEMP_AAA.B_ID = wanted_rows.B_ID) = 0
  

  In addition, you mix var and number of always use the same type or convert explicitly (to_number or to_char)

  WITH
  MATCH_ROWS AS
  (
         SELECT A_ID||B_ID IDS FROM TEMP_AAA WHERE      B_ID           =12345
  --                                                    varchar2(10)   number
  ),
  ...
  

  And again in the

                    THEN
                     (SELECT NVL((SELECT IDS FROM TEMP_AAA WHERE B_ID           =12345),'NO ROWS') IDS FROM DUAL)
  --                                                             varchar2(10)   number
  

  Kind regards

  Peter

• How to get the line number in the line itself in the Sql query?

  Hello
  I pick up some lines of a sql query. Is it possible to get line number in each line while all lines are read?
  
  Like this:
  
  RowNum data1 data2
  1 abc era
  2 NBH ioi

  Yes.

  ROWNUM

  http://download.Oracle.com/docs/CD/E11882_01/server.112/e17118/pseudocolumns009.htm#SQLRF00255

  select rownum, data1, data2
  from yourtable;
  

• Any difference between the separate function and aggregation in sql query cost?

  Hello
  I've run many models sql stmts - such as:
  one) using a single table
  (b) using the two tables, using simple joins or outer joins
  
  but I didn't notice a difference in sql stmts in cost and implementation plan...
  In any case, my colleague insists on only using the aggregate function is less expensive compared to
  separate... (something I've not confirmed, that is why I believe that they are exactly the same...)
  
  For the situation described above under 1 sql... We could for example use
  

  select distinct deptno
  
   from emp

  select count(*), deptno
  
   from emp
  
   group by deptno

  select distinct owner, object_type from all_objects

  select count(*), owner, object_type from all_objects
  
  group by owner, object_type

  Have you ever found no difference between the two...?
  
  Note: I use Ora DB 10g v2.
  
  Thank you
  SIM

  Alexandre Gelin says:
  function separate and aggregation are for different uses and can give the same result, but if you use the aggregate function to get the separate records, it will be expensive...

  really? I find them almost identical to 11g. Actually GROUP BY is almost always more fast for me in the old days.

  article about this askTom Re: any difference between the separate function and aggregation in sql query cost?
  This applies mainly to the older oracle versions http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/rdb/pdf/distinct_derivedtables_groupby_sort_tech_article.pdf

• The search syntax of SQL query against the data type varchar2 preserving valid data.

  Have a data model that we are not allowed to change and the column in question is a varchar2 (20). The column has at this stage no foreign key to the list of valid values. So, until we can get those who control the data model in order to make the adjustments we need for a SQL query that root out us bad data on the hours fixed.
  
  Is what we expect to be good data below:
  
  -Whole number, without floating point
  -Length of 5 or less (greater than zero but less than 99999)
  -Text "No_RP" can exist.
  
  Request demo below works most of the time with the exception of 'or Column1 is null' is not contagious in the null record. I tried to change the logical terms around, but did not understand the correct layout still provide it. So help would be greatly appreciated it someone could put me straight on how to properly register a null value in the recordset that has been selected with other types of error for end users to correct their mistakes. Another thing, I suppose there could be a better approach syntactically to a call find all offender characters such as *, &, (and so on.)
  
  WITH Sample_Data AS (SELECT '0' collar OF DOUBLE UNION ALL)
  SELECT "2" collar OF DOUBLE UNION ALL
  SELECT "99999" col OF DOUBLE UNION ALL
  SELECT "100000" col OF DOUBLE UNION ALL
  SELECT '1 a' collar OF DOUBLE UNION ALL
  SELECT the "ABCD" OF DOUBLE UNION ALL pass
  SELECT 'A1' collar OF DOUBLE UNION ALL
  SELECT ' *' collar OF DOUBLE UNION ALL
  SELECT "/" pass OF DOUBLE UNION ALL
  SELECT '-' col OF DOUBLE UNION ALL
  SELECT ' ' collar OF DOUBLE UNION ALL
  SELECT "pass OF DOUBLE UNION ALL
  4. SELECT 5 6' collar OF DOUBLE UNION ALL
  SELECT "24.5" collar OF DOUBLE UNION ALL
  SELECT '-3' collar OF DOUBLE UNION ALL.
  SELECT 'A' collar OF DOUBLE UNION ALL
  SELECT 'F' OF DOUBLE UNION ALL cervical
  SELECT the 'Z' OF DOUBLE UNION ALL pass
  SELECT the pass 'Bye' FROM DUAL UNION ALL
  SELECT the "Hello World" OF DOUBLE UNION ALL pass
  SELECT "=" col OF DOUBLE UNION ALL
  SELECT "+" col OF DOUBLE UNION ALL
  SELECT '_' pass OF DOUBLE UNION ALL
  SELECT '-' col OF DOUBLE UNION ALL
  SELECT ' (' col OF DOUBLE UNION ALL)
  SELECT ')' collar OF DOUBLE UNION ALL
  SELECT '&' collar OF DOUBLE UNION ALL
  SELECT ' ^' collar OF DOUBLE UNION ALL
  SELECT '%' collar OF DOUBLE UNION ALL
  SELECT the pass of "$" OF DOUBLE UNION ALL
  SELECT the pass ' # ' TO DOUBLE UNION ALL
  SELECT ' @' collar OF DOUBLE UNION ALL
  SELECT '!' collar OF DOUBLE UNION ALL
  SELECT ' ~' collar OF DOUBLE UNION ALL
  SELECT "' collar OF DOUBLE UNION ALL
  SELECT '.' pass FROM DUAL
  )
  SELECT col from Sample_data
  WHERE (translate (col, '_0123456789', '_') is not null
  or length (col) > 5
  col = 0 or
  or col is null)
  and (upper (col) <>'NO_RP');
  
  One more thing, I also took the approach of the regular expression, but he could not understand. If anyone knows how to do with this approach, I would also appreciate learning this method as well. Below is a close because I had. Impossible to get a range to work as "between 0 and 100000", guessing because of the comparison of varchar2 and # even attempted using to_char and to_number.
  
  Select to_number (column1) from the testsql where REGEXP_LIKE (column1, ' ^ [[: digit:]] + $') ORDER BY to_number (column1) CSA;
  
  Thanks in advance for anyone to help.
  
  Nick

  Hello

  Thanks for posting the sample data in a useable form.
  It would be useful that you also posted the accurate results you wanted from this data. You want the same results as those produced by the query you posted, except that nulls should be included? If so:

  SELECT     col
  FROM     sample_data
  WHERE     CASE
           WHEN  UPPER (col) = 'NO_RP'               THEN  1
           WHEN  col IS NULL                    THEN -1
           WHEN  LTRIM (col, '0123456789') IS NOT NULL     THEN -2
           WHEN  LENGTH (col) > 5               THEN -3
                                         ELSE TO_NUMBER (col)
       END     NOT BETWEEN     1
                AND          99999
  ;
  

  The requirement that pass! = 0 gives that much more difficult. You could test easily for an integer from 1 to 5 digits, but then you must have a separate condition to make sure that the chain was not '0', '00', '000', ' 0000 'or ' 00000'.
  (Unlike Solomon, I guess that do not want to choose no-0 numbers starting by 0, such as ' 007 'or ' 02138'.)

  Using regular expressions, you may lose a few keystrokes, but you also lose a lot of clarity:

  SELECT     col
  FROM     sample_data
  WHERE     REGEXP_LIKE ( col
                , '^0{1,5}$'
                )
  OR NOT     REGEXP_LIKE ( NVL ( UPPER (col)
                   , 'BAD'
                   )
                , '^(([1-9][0-9]{0,4})|NO_RP)$'
                )
  ;
  

  Published by: Frank Kulash, December 13, 2010 21:50

  Published by: Frank Kulash, December 13, 2010 22:11
  Added regular expression solution

• Help in the Search Condition in the SQL query

  Hi gurus,
  
  I had the table with 3 columns
  

  col1           col2             col3
  123        johns123     edwin321s
  seenu       janu      satya123reset
  3456       kris         123stest
  
  In single SQL query i want to print the value based on the '123' is  
  
  123,john123,
  satya123reset,
  123test
  
  or to print the records starts with 's' like 
  s123
  seenu,satya123reset
  stest

  Thanks in advance
  
  Published by: SeenuGuddu on October 15, 2009 21:55
  
  Published by: SeenuGuddu on October 15, 2009 21:55
  
  Published by: SeenuGuddu on October 15, 2009 22:07

  Hello

  Not sure you mean exactly, but maybe you could do something like:

  MHO%xe> with t as ( -- generating your sample data:
    2  select '123' col1, 'johns123' col2, 'edwin321s' col3 from dual union all
    3  select 'seenu', 'janu', 'satya123reset' from dual union all
    4  select '3456', 'kris', '123stest' from dual
    5  )
    6  --
    7  -- actual query:
    8  --
    9  select rtrim ( case when col1 like '%123%' or col1 like 's%' then col1||', '  end
   10         ||      case when col2 like '%123%' or col2 like 's%' then col2||', '  end
   11         ||      case when col3 like '%123%' or col3 like 's%' then col3||', '  end
   12         , ', ')
   13  from   t;
  
  RTRIM(CASEWHENCOL1LIKE'%123%'ORC
  --------------------------------
  123, johns123
  seenu, satya123reset
  123stest
  

  You mention:

  or print the records begins by a ' as

  However the output desired is not begin with s for 's123' and "stest"... you can adjust your specification or your output...

• Clarification of the SQL query in 2 day + Guide APEX

  I worked through the Oracle Database Express Edition 2 day + Application Express Developer's Guide, and try to decipher the SQL query in Chapter 4 (building your app).

  The code is:

  SELECT d.DEPARTMENT_ID,

  d.DEPARTMENT_NAME,

  (select count (*) from oehr_employees where department_id = d.department_id)

  "Number of employees", he said.

  substr (e.first_name, 1, 1) |'. ' || Select 'Name Manager',

  c.COUNTRY_NAME 'place '.

  OEHR_DEPARTMENTS d,

  E OEHR_EMPLOYEES

  OEHR_LOCATIONS l,

  C OEHR_COUNTRIES

  WHERE d.LOCATION_ID = l.LOCATION_ID

  AND l.COUNTRY_ID = c.COUNTRY_ID

  AND e.department_id = d.DEPARTMENT_ID

  AND d.manager_id = e.employee_id

  AND instr (superior (d.department_name), superior (nvl (:P2_REPORT_SEARCH,d.department_name))) > 0)

  I don't know exactly what is happening in the last line. I think I understand what the different functions but I'm not clear on the use of the: P2_REPORT_SEARCH string.

  What does this string? This code simply checking that d.department_name isn't NA?

  I have SQL experience but am not very familiar with the Oracle PL/SQL implementation. Can someone please give me a brief breakdown that check is doing in the context of the overall query? The application seems to work even if the conditional statement is not included.

  Thank you.

  2899145 wrote:

  Thanks for the reply. I apologize if the information I added was incomplete. The code came from the day 2 + Application Express (version 4.2) Developer Guide.

  In the section 'your own Application of 4 Buuilding' https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E37097_01/doc.42/e35122/build_app.htm#TDPAX04000 , they describe the creation of a report

  page that includes the "manager_id" and 'location_id '. The SQL query, I pasted above extracted from the data in other tables to substitute the real 'name of the Manager' and 'rent '.

  for the corresponding ID values. It makes sense, and the part of the SQL query that explicitly doing this makes sense.

  However, given that the document is a guide for the development of the APEX, I guess the command:

  AND instr (upper (d.department_name), upper (nvl (:P2_REPORT_SEARCH,d.department_name))) > 0

  done something valuable, and I do not recognize what is exactly the value.

  From a practical point of view why would I need to include this conditional statement?  Which only added to the application?

  Looking at the guide in question, it is clear that the

  AND instr(upper(d.department_name),upper(nvl(:P2_REPORT_SEARCH,d.department_name)))>0
  

  the line is completely unnecessary in the context of this tutorial, and it can be removed. The search in the tutorial app page is implemented by using a report filter interactive rather than a P2_REPORT_SEARCH element, which does not seem to exist at all. (It's a quirk of the APEX that bind variable references to non-existent items are replaced with NULL silently rather than exceptions). I thought that perhaps it would be legacy code a version of the tutorial prior to the introduction of interactive reports at the APEX 3.1, but I can't find explicit instructions to create such an element of filter in the 3.0 tutorial. I guess it must have been automatically generated by the application wizard when you create a standard report page.

  If you do not want to see the effect he would have (as described in the post above), leave it in the source report, add a text element of P2_REPORT_SEARCH, and a button "submit" on page 2 and experimenting to find different values of the element and clicking on the submit button...