Stabilizing warp count a lot more images than actually exists...

Hello, everyone!

I just installed first CC 2014 and I have problems with the stabilizer deform... I'm trying to use it in the clip with 25s and 24 frames per second, but when I click on "Analyze" it shows 1035764 images! In addition, it will take 2560 minutes to analyze all this! Do the math, it should have only something like 600 executives and take a lot less time...

I know this stabilizer is very buggy, but I couldn't find a solution for this. Can someone help me?

Thanks in advance!

Well well, for some reason any randomly, if I replace each file for itself the bug go away, I had to do this one by one. If anyone has the same problem, try to do this.

This action solves the problem for now, but it took time to discover and solve. Hopefully this won't happen again.

Tags: Premiere

Similar Questions

  • Is there no way to create a separate mobile site now this Muse creates only sensitive Web sites? Due to the nature of my site, sensitive aspects create a lot more problems than they fix. How can I go back to an older version of Muse?

    I've updated Muse about 13 days ago and since that time, it was a nightmare trying to get the 'sensitive' aspects to cooperate. I don't want to create a website full of places so that sensitive aspects working fluidly. I have images that overlap that separate that they respond to the reduction in the browser. I liked having the opportunity to work separately mobile aspects of my site and now I was just facing a lot of new revisions to do this upgrade.

    Is it possible for me to go down to just before Muse these new updates or always have the opportunity to work with mobile versions of the site separate from the desktop version? These new updates make almost a waste of time for me to use the Muse.

    You can still add a phone or additional Tablet version for a responive Web site...

    ... How well that works is up to your skills as a designer

  • Question of VSphere licenses (attributed more CPU than actually)

    Hello!

    I have three licenses of business (1 to 6 cores per processor) of vSphere 4 with different capacities. And I have a problem with both of them. In VCenter license page shows me that a license assigned to 6 CPU, but its actually attributed only to 4 CPUS (two ESX servers with two cpu's (4cores) of each). And another licensed showed as assigned to 16 CPU, but actually his attributed only to 14 CPU'. This license has a total 16 CPU capacity and that's why I can't add another a host ESX to my Infrastructure. And with last license, I have not any problemms. Why it might be so? Please help me if you know how to solve this problem.

    Try to remove ALL licenses and add them.

    If this does not work go to your portal vLicense on VM Ware, regenerate the NEW keys for your existing licenses and remove existing keys in vCenter, and then ADD the new that you generate.

    You can split a license and then join them that will make new keys.

    Otherwise, you must call the vmware support and ask people to licensing to help you.

  • My XP guest uses a lot more memory on the new laptop

    I just got a Dell Studio 15 and moved my Windows XP VM to it, and it uses a lot more memory than on my old system.  I don't know how VMWare allocates memory, but on my old system, I saw almost no additional memory used when you start this virtual machine (with the exception of the cache memory), but on the new, it uses almost as much memory that I have assigned to the virtual machine (1024 MB).  It is also worth noting that I use VMWare 7 on a new and 6.5 on the old host.

    Anything I can do to get great efficiency that I was getting on my old system?

    really not use 2 virtual processors on a host that has 2 CPUs.

    What is an Ubuntu 9.10 system?

    Other than adding

    mainmem.backing = 'name '.

    for the vmx file.

    This will slow down the virtual machine, but you wanted to do that ;-)

    ___________________________________

    VMX-settings- VMware-liveCD - VM-infirmary

  • IMAQ Overlay - more uniform than the image sensor

    Hi, I have a certain problem that could be more aesthetic than problematic.

    IMAQdx Grab runs in a loop, acquisition of the images in real time, which are then treated in this loop, and finally some calculated the points are superimposed on the image. The last thing I've done in this loop is to send the picture to overlay to an image of front control, so that the user can see the results superimposed on the image in real time.

    However, the image is mainly image appears without results superimposed so they appear only once in a while, very "flickery,". However, the results are well calculated for each image. If I use a probe to look at the purple image wire just before moving the witness in the block diagram, the probe constantly displays the lines superimposed flicker.

    I hope that I was a semi-claire, or see the attached picture. Does anyone have any idea why this might be?

    Thanks in advance

    Where did you clear collection to remove the previous measures? It is best to place before new overlay to labview more time to show.

    Maybe I'm wrong, but indicator can be only one command to display image and design occurs in the separate thread later.

    And probe creates the copy of the image data when it is called and did not progress until she's copying finishes. I prefer to do it manually with image: have a separate image display buffer (Create image.vi) and copy after all treatments and overlay is made (copy image.vi).

  • Satellite M60: printed image is much more yellow than the image on the screen

    I use a printer Hewlett - Packard PSC 750 with my Toshiba M60. Problem is when I print a picture, it is much more yellow than what is on the screen of what is printed. The problem is not moved with my old Packard Bell.

    Someone at - it a solution?

    Hello

    I agree with Stefan and I can't imagine that this is not because of the laptop. You should check all the print settings.

  • Why is 24GO or a lot more than 12 GB RAM?

    I understand that it is twice the size, but the man is much more expensive.

    It seems that someone here who has built a core i7 has disappeared from the route of 12 GB, but im wish you up to 24 GB motherboard

    You hear people say that the RAM is cheap but not 24 GB.

    Need 2 sets of these to 24GB.

    http://www.Newegg.com/product/ProductList.aspx?submit=Ene & N = 2010170147% 201052346982 & name = 1 2% 20% 283% 20 GB x 204 GB % 29

    Just curious: Glenn

    DDR3 took some time occurs in 2 GB glue and they were initially much more expensive than DDR2 sticks. Now that the i7 has gained a firm foothold, it sees the price of 2 GB DDR3 sticks fall quickly, but where people came from 4 GB 'machines' or less, 12 GB of memory seemed more than enough for the future, there was virtually no demand for the latest sticks in sizes of 4 G. For video editors and CS5 applications 64-bit to come, you can see a few more of interest to 4 GB sticks, more manufacturers enter that specific market and the decline in prices because of a increased competition in this rather small market, but I think he will be only the next year that the significant premium on 4 G sticks will fall a little. As always, be on the cutting edge of technology carries a high price tag.

    Now with TESLA around the corner and the coprocessor C2070 supporting 6 GB of its own memory and is not a SLI solution (that initially is supported in CS5, according to Dennis), this coprocessor support can reduce the need for memory for more than 12 GB.

    The price erosion only happens when factory more enter the game and demand rises, leading to increased competition. Remember what happened with the prices of DVD or BRD, plasma or LCD flat screen readers etc. Then, give it some time...

  • Stabilizing warp help

    So for the week past stabilizing warp did something really strange. Instead of smoothing my images, he throws in the upper right part of my opinion. I'll include images of the problem. I don't really know how to solve the problem. Any advice would be more than welcome.

    Thank you!

    With stabilizer Warp disabled:

    Screen Shot 2014-11-13 at 3.12.02 PM.png

    With Warp stabilizer turned on:

    Screen Shot 2014-11-13 at 3.12.18 PM.png

    Hey Harrison,

    It is a known problem. The solution is to change the rendering engine of: Mercury Playback Engine software only in the project settings. We hope to have a fix soon. Moreover, what GPU do you have? What is the Iris Intel or something else.

    Thank you

    Kevin

  • It seems like a lot, a lot more junk emails since his arrival at Thunderbird, why?

    I just get a lot more junk emails than I ever did with Windows Live. I do not answer e-mails, I don't know, but there are 5-10 new junk emails every day

    Thunderbird does not recognize the many unwanted emails, even if its controls are configured correctly. I have two accounts (on 12) where Thunderbird does not delete messages identified as junk e-mail. The Thunderbird mail filter is buggy and doesn't always work.

  • M7 MacBook 1.3 GHz running more hot than the 1.2 GHz m5?

    Does anyone have experience with this? The new m7 Skylake 1.3 GHz running more hot than the 1.2 GHz m5?

    I hate having a computer warm on my knees, so I tend to buy the m5 to 1.2 GHz. However, I wonder what it is ' has really a lot of difference in actual use. Someone at - it a glimpse of this?

    Thank you!

    Hi Joel, any CPU which is clocked to run at a higher speed will have a slightly higher temperature if both the Broadwell Core M in 2015 Macbook and Skylake processor in the Macbook from 2016 offer low quantity of heat compared to the current MacBook Pro line. If you are still worried I recommend to visit an Apple store or dealer with a MacBook running all day to feel authorized intrados.

  • More effective than a virus - KB930494 MS update ends with true Msg that Windows cannot now work correctly

    More effective than a virus - KB930494 MS update ends with true Msg that Windows cannot now work correctly

    I started to reinstall Windows XP, after he has screwed up and I discovered that all the system snapshot
    I created backups worthless - MS removes automatically after 90 days...

    But when reinstalling Windows XP Pro MCE 2005 I managed to beat or dodge the many problems - like all the
    famous error when update .NET Framework 1.1 Service Pack 1 and many others
    Suddenly I met an error generated by Microsoft of NONRECOVERABLE type!

    While trying to install Windows, I agreed that Windows was full of bugs and security flaws and
    need a large number of fixpacks installed via Windows Update.
    Such a group of patches is called KB930494 and the full name is:

    .NET framework 1.0 Service Pack 3 SYSTEM. WEB. DLL and MSCOREE. DLL Security Update for Windows XP Media Center Edition and Windows XP Tablet PC Edition

    Windows Update gave a brief error msg that this update has failed and I have tried to run this update
    manually when it produces the following error message: (note he's telling the truth when it)
    claims that "Windows may not work correctly")

    ---
    KB930494 Setup error

    Error while updating your system.
    Windows XP has been partially updated and may not work properly.

    Ok
    ---

    So, this update of Microsoft killed my system - it sure that _ 'does not properly"more.
    Lots of things off, lots of BSOD...

    Og - of course I should have used the system restore and created a backup that I should come back...!
    I did well - but this bomb of viral type of Microsoft made sure it was not possible to create
    a valid system by restoring such a backup. Probably because half the file system matches the other.

    The worst part is - even if I try to reinstall Windows again, avoiding this Virus created by MS, how can I be sure that
    This will be the only disguised bomb nothing extraordinary provided by Windows Update as necessary security patches?

    So guys, what is the best utility backup/restore partition there?

    Rgds. E. Ben

    Use Partiton Lofic is a down load for free on the partition, you can also use Easeus Disk Copy. It is a free program with a friendly interface.

  • ChkDsk cause more problems than good

    Hello

    It is always advisable to not run Chkdsk (Via Windows 7)? Can it do more harm than good, if you don't know what you're doing :-)

    I keep getting error 41 and I was told it's because of the hard drive, but ChkDsk showed no problems.

    Hello

    No, not particularly. It depends entirely on the settings/flags that use you as well, but in general, if chkdsk is unable to solve problems, it means that your drive is gone too well. For example, if you run/r to locate bad sectors and recover readable information (implies / f with the addition of the analysis of the physical errors), and he notes, he cannot solve, etc, you should at this time save all data and replace the drive ASAP.

    I wouldn't be so quick to judge a player, some people blame readers simply because they are not aware of what it may be.

    To help you, we will need for the. DMP files to analyze what exactly happened at the time of the accident, etc.

    If you do not know where. The DMP files, here's how to get to them are:

    1. go to the folder % systemroot%\Minidump.

    2 copy all the DMP files in the Minidump folder on your desktop and zip then those files.

    3. download the zip containing the. Files DMP Onedrive or a Web hosting of your choice and paste it in your answer. Favorite sites: Onedrive, Mediafire, Dropbox, etc.. Nothing to do with the timers waiting, download managers, etc.

    4 (optional): The type of. DMP files in the Minidump folder are known as small images of memory. In any % there will be what we call a kernel image (if your system is configured to generate). It is labeled MEMORY. DMP. The difference between the small images of memory and core-dumps in the simplest definition is that a kernel image contains much more information at the time of the accident, which allows more debugging of your question. If your upload speed and you're not going against any strict caps bandwidth and/or use, etc., the kernel image is the best choice. Note that the core-dumps are much larger in size due to containing much more information, that's why I mentioned the download speed, etc..

    If you plan to use Onedrive but don't know how to download it, please see the following:

    Download pictures and files to Onedrive.

    After doing this, to learn how to share the link to the file if you are not aware, please visit the following link - share files and folders and change the permissions and view 'Get link'.

    Please note that all programs "cleaner" such as TuneUpUtilities, CCleaner, etc., default will remove. DMP files after use. That said, if you run this software, you will need to allow the system to block one more time to generate a crash dump.

    If your computer does. DMP files, follow these steps:

    1. start > type systemroot which should show the Windows folder, click it. Once inside this folder, make sure there is a Minidump folder created. If not, CTRL-SHIFT-N to create a new folder and name it Minidump.

    2 Windows key + Pause key. This should appear in the system. Click Advanced on the left system settings > advanced > performance > settings > advanced > make sure there is a check mark for "manage automatically the size of pagefile for all readers."

    3 Windows key + Pause key. This should appear in the system. Click Advanced on the left system settings > advanced > startup and Recovery > settings > system > ensure there is a check mark next to "write an event to the system log.

    Make sure Small Memory Dump is selected and ensure that the path is % systemroot%\Minidump.

    4. ensure that viewers is ENABLED:

    Start > Search > type services.msc > on the name tab, search for Windows Error Reporting Service > if the service status is not started, then right-click and select start. Also to ensure that, under Startup Type set to automatic rather than manual. You can do this by right click, select properties and under general selection on 'Automatic' startup type and then click on apply.

    If you can not get into normal mode to do this, please do so via Safe Mode.

    Kind regards

    Patrick

  • After effects 13.1.3 constantly give the error message is: "2 or more images for playback needs.

    I After Effects 13.1.3 and I use a mac 2011 pro 17 "with 16 GB of ram, but I have a project I have I am not able to work because of After Effects not being not able to make more then an image at a time. When I go to the RAM preview it says "after effects error: Preview RAM 2 or more images for playback needs.» This phenomenon occurred as soon as I opened Adobe Premiere at the same time, but this is not the case and more. It is all the time. I can open a project, but after a little less than 3 minutes, he returned to make only an image. Purge memory doesn't do absolutely nothing, purge in fact anything actually the problem come immediately.

    It's frustrating! I have deadlines to meet. Not to mention having to pay out of pocket for software that has not worked since Mac OS X 10.8. I wouldn't pay for the defective software.

    I have version 13.2 and AE 2015, but without worrying about my problem remains. After working a project long enough after 15 minutes the system gives me just "needs 2 or more images for reading" ~ lets be honest, I don't think Adobe has any idea of what continues to resolve my problem and does not have to last year. I'm just done with them. I'm glad I'm not paying too much pocket, but as I pay after CS5 adobe became cheap made and sold at a great price. as said somewhere else...

    "It is another recurring problem with AE CC and Yosemite, I fear there is no answer you'll love! Adobe should never say that AE was ready Yosemite because it obviously isn't. Just another example of the still decreasing faith of Adobe customer, and their ability to address the main issues timely.

    Current major bugs:

    Loss of import requesting reboot.

    2 or more images RAM Preview error.

    Skip first few of a RAM Preview frames.

    Do not release RAM after leaving AE.

    No good people Adobe pointing to articles they have written saying some of these things does not work! Just bloody fix then cease to release these buggy software! »


    I experienced all of these problems. The only solution is to units of my operating system and install night of striped and as a filmmaker doing all the 6 months is unacceptable. It's a waste of my time and my money. Get Adobe together!

  • Stabilizing warp out question

    Since the update for Premiere Pro when I use stabilizing warp all that it generates is a small rectangle at the top with a small piece of footage inside. I tried tweaking the settings and always reset my preferences, but it comes out with the same result. It works when I use After Effects, but which can be quite annoying given the render time and which do not. What I'm doing wrong here? This is an image of the output.

    Screen Shot 2014-10-14 at 7.29.19 PM.png

    Hi Gjhobbs13,

    Please check the discussion below and check if it helps.

    https://forums.Adobe.com/message/6826226#6826226

    Kind regards

    Vinay

  • Stabilizing warp - specifying the region to stabilize

    I'm trying to stabilize some footage, but stabilizing Warp in first Pro CC seems to stabilize moving objects in the foreground rather than on the bottom, creating strange effects, as you can imagine.

    I've seen tutorials on using stabilizer Warp in After Effects and masking the foreground for Warp stabilizing action use the background as its inputs. Is it possible to do this in Premiere Pro, or even something easier (that AE method seems complicated and some work to do).

    Thanks for any advice.

    -Keith

    Hi Keith,

    There is currently no way to do within first (maybe there is a plugin?)...

    The best way to do it is using after effects VFX stabilizing Warp. Sorry if you've already seen these, but others may find them useful.

    http://Adobe.LY/11KwNIo

    http://Adobe.LY/1ey5A0U

    Hope it will be useful.

    Best,

    Peter Garaway

    Adobe

    Premiere Pro

Maybe you are looking for