Strange behavior when recording in the form of photoshop layers

Similar Questions

• 2.1 RC1 - strange behavior when you change the data in the table

  I recently found a new strange behavior of the SQL Developer. On a small table or a table with a filter where all the data is loaded, but not all lines can be displayed on the screen, trying to change the data in the table. When I confirm the editing with the key enter, Developer SQL jumps always until the end of the data. Quite confusing and boring. The cursor seems to remain in the field that I have edited, then moving upward or downward line force SQL developer to this line.
  
  Appears not to be the case when all the data are loaded instead of punch, but if you force Developer SQL to load all the data, I can reproduce this strange behavior.
  
  Sven

  Bug 9205959 is fixed.

  -Rambeau

• Strange behavior when searching from the address bar

  Hi all! I tried to remove google as the default search provider in firefox. To do this, I did these two things-

  -Duckduckgo moved to the top of the list in the firefox search box and set it as the current research.

  -Put the URL 'https://duckduckgo.com/?q=' keyword and keyword.enabled to true.

  However, this makes my search from the location bar (single word and several Word channels) still return google.

  There seems to be something to do with the entry of google search into the firefox search bar. If I remove that, it behaves as expected - single word searches then return an error "Cannot find server" (not quite what I wanted but probably correct behavior) and several Word searches go to Duckduckgo.

  Any suggestions on how to solve this problem without removing the option of completely google search would be appreciated.

  Thanks in advance

  It is supposed to function as described in this article, it seems that you have followed: search bar location | How | Firefox Help. I see no reason for the presence or absence of a plugin of search engine related. You have additional modules that could touch location bar behavior?

  You can try this: create a clean profile Firefox. Which will work around the current modules and custom, settings have fresh data bases of fresh settings and a cache folder.

  Close Firefox and starts in the Profile Manager, as described in the management profiles. Any time want spending profiles, close Firefox and come back to this dialog box.

  Change your keyword preferences and see if they work in the new profile. A little luck?

• Issues coming out of "sleep mode" and strange behavior when restarting with GPU

  I use a desktop computer HP P7-1240 completely stock except for a GPU EVGA GeForce GTX 750 TI SC. The GPU works well when the computer is running (which is strange because the forums have several other discussions mentioning the 700 series must be incompatible with my BIOS).

  However, there are two main strange problems that have arisen since the installation of the GPU. One is that, every time that the computer enters mode "sleep", he refuses to wake back up correctly. It seems to me that the computer active but sends all the signals back panel (at the very least, no video because my monitors remain blank). On rare occasions, he wakes back correctly, but at least 90% of the time, it must be restarted. Upon reboot, the same problem sometimes (not), and the computer must be rebooted a second time until it will start again.

  This leads to the second problem. During startup, the computer goes to a black screen, listing the specifications of basic computer skills (see attached photo. In this screen, the computer does not meet any entry.  He proceeds to beep 3 times, all the same length and height spaced about 30 seconds of gap. After the third beep, the screen goes black and then the computer starts normally with no other strange behavior.

  Without the GPU, none of these problems occur. At the very least, not regularly.

  I saw another thread mentioned that, while the HP support for my office page lists not her, there is an update of the BIOS for my motherboard which has fixed issues related to the GPU more modern. By nature it is an update of the BIOS that does not (seem to) officially support Windows 7, I am reluctant to go forward with this potential solution.

  Although I intend to build myself a new computer from scratch at a certain point, I was hoping to get at least another year out of this machine, if not 2.  While this question does not seem to be immediately threatening the stability of the computer, I can't help but think that it is a question should I go quickly to avoid future problems (not to mention it would save me a good amount of electricity to be able to enter the mode 'sleep' on a regular basis).

  Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!

  

  Problem has been solved!

  For those of you who have trouble sleeping with the p7-1240 or computers with a card mother identical (MSI Jasmine Ms 7778 ver 1.0), I suggest that you follow this thread:

  http://h30434.www3.HP.com/T5/desktop-hardware/unable-to-boot-with-new-graphics-card/TD-p/3930544/highlight/true

  It is to use an update for your BIOS that is intended only for PC under Windows 8, but that seems to work perfectly well with Windows 7 PC. It solved my problems of sleep and makes the computer to behave at least semi normally while restarting.

  However, as indicated in the wire, an update of the BIOS should be a last resort because it can turn your machine into a very heavy and expensive paperweight if something does not work. Do not forget that you have the worm 1.0 card mother MSI Ms 7778 Jasmine and remember that you update the BIOS version 8.18.

  As I am looking for 2aeo on HP.com currently (according to the thread leading up to), I'm not find the same links I found last week when I went through the update. However, you can find elsewhere.

• How to lock the record in the form?

  Hi all
  
  I want to lock the selected records in the time of the query. Let's say I want to lock the records in the Employee table. And I have a block of the base table (no view on screen) the employee and one table from another base block (display fields: Department code and the name of the Department, situation, number of employees on the screen) which is a summary of records selected in the Employee table.
  
  Now, I want to lock the records in the Employee table when run query so that some backend process cannot 'touch' the annals which are already displayed on the screen.
  
  I tried to put the ' SELECT '1' IN v_dummy FROM EMPLOYEE WHERE update_user =: B_CONTROL.c_user FOR UPDATE NOWAIT ' under the block trigger 'On-Lock' of base table. Then go to SQL * MORE to update the employee record. However, I can update the record successfully. This isn't my expected result.
  So, how can I lock the record in the form? Any suggestion? Please help and thank you all for advice.
  
  I use Oracle 10 g 10g 2 formula.
  
  Thank you.
  
  Kind regards.

  Looks like that record is already locked by another user. So, what do you expect the form in this case.

  BTW... Instead of locking the record "by hand", you can also use EXECUTE_QUERY (FOR_UPDATE)

• When you close the form "Do you want to save the changes" window

  Hello
  I have a master form / detail where in my trigger after QUERY I change the item field data of LOV to a value non-base. When I simply select Master record(NOT in query mode) my detail records pop up in the retail block. This is done in EXECUTE_QUERY in trigger a TIME NEW BLOCK INSTANCE in detail block. But when I close the form he's asked me to save changes even though I haven't changed anything. I have this statement after QUERY Trigger
  SET_RECORD_PROPERTY(:SYSTEM.) TRIGGER_RECORD,: SYSTEM. TRIGGER_BLOCK, STATUS, QUERY_STATUS); This problem doesn't happen in QUERY MODE.
  
  I tried the two Set_Item_Property('BLOCK.) CODE', ITEM_IS_VALID, PROPERTY_TRUE); This property in the POST_QUERY and the Set_Item_Property ('item_name', VALIDATE_FROM_LIST, PROPERTY_TRUE); in QUERY-MASTER / DETAILS trigger but it did not work.
  
  Help, please
  
  Thank you

  If you take the second codepart, you may need to add a CREATE_RECORD in the last ELSE like:

      ELSE
        -- No master-record, found, use has to enter data, FK_ID can be pre-populated from the LoV-Selection
        CLOSE crCheck;
        -- Create an empty reocrd here
        GO_BLCOK('MASTER');
        CREATE_RECORD;
        :MASTER.FK_ID:=:BL_CONTROL.IT_FK_ID;
      END IF;
  

  I hope this helps.

• I made a form for my clients, I did this form with a button "submit" button, the button will save the form and send it, I did the URL to go to a different (different to mine) e-mail address but when I distribute the form and it is complete

  I made a form for my clients, I did this form with a button "submit" button, the button Save the form and send it, I did the URL to go to a different (different to mine) e-mail address but when I distribute the form and it is supplemented by my clients it send to my email address not the URL how to change this.

  No matter how you have configured the Send button when you use the feature distribute the form. There are some e-mail address is in your identity preferences (Edit > preferences > identity) and use it. If you can change the email address it or not to use distribute the form and the button send the value you want.

  One thing that happens when you use the feature to distribute the form is the form is enabled Reader, you can do separately, but you really shouldn't do if the form must be used by others. The dispenser a form must activate using their copy under license of Acrobat Reader.

• I have created a complete either form, with fields to interrogate.  When a test the form and enter the date in a field - it automatically inserts the SAME date in all other areas. How do fix you this?

  I created a form to fill in professional, with several fields.  When I try the form and enter data in a field - it fills the SAME data in all other fields.

  Give a unique name to each field.

• Display message to users when they submit the form

  Like most, I am relatively new to creating PDF forms and need my form to display a message to the client when they submit the form. Something like:

  "Thank you to send your form our team will contact you shortly with instructions.

  I created the form in Adobe Acrobat 9 Pro to be distributed and returned to PDF attachment by mail.

  Any information you could give me would be greatly appreciated.

  Is the form put in place to submit to a web server or by email?

  Edit: Oops, I see that you have configured it to submit by e-mail. If you have created your own button submit, you can add an additional JavaScript action after the action of 'Submit form' which uses the app.alert method to display a message to the user. Something like:

  // Show a message to the user
  app.alert("Your message goes here.", 3);
  

  More information on method app.alert is available here: http://livedocs.adobe.com/acrobat_sdk/9.1/Acrobat9_1_HTMLHelp/JS_API_AcroJS.88.135.html

• Hello! The Creative cloud program does not. When you open the file in Photoshop says that there are not many fonts, use Typekit. Typekit itself turned off. All programs downloaded and saved, but Photoshop doesn't see Typekit. What should do? Also says I h

  Hello!

  The Creative cloud program does not. When you open the file in Photoshop says that there are not many fonts, use Typekit. Typekit itself turned off. All programs downloaded and saved, but Photoshop doesn't see Typekit. What should do?

  Also says that I have no access to this service. For access, please contact your COMPUTER administrator or connect using the ID

  Hello

  Greetings!

  Is Typekit on?

  Visit this link: Add to your desktop of Typekit fonts

  Concerning

  Jitendra

• Java Fx: strange behavior when trying to write a vertical label

  I've noticed some strange behavior on the rotated texts (Label,...) in JavaFx...

  Originally, I just wanted to be able to display labels vertically in a GridPane. The first problem is that there is no simple way to indicate a label to display its content in one direction and given orientation. It would be nice to have something like the property on the side of the tabPane allowing to easily turn the text...

  In any case, I quit then myself to use the rotation function to turn my Label. It's when the strange thing began to happen... I put my label in a cell of the grid that is not large enough to display the full text if it is not turned, but the text must be able to adapt rotated once. The problem is that the text appears wrapped even when it is turned as if packaging test have been done until the text is actually shot... The problem can be seen on this screenshot http://hpics.li/e210f2f : the text to be displayed is written in the ToolTip and we can see that only the first letter of the rotated text is displayed in the grid of the cell even if there is more than enough space to display all...

  Anyone has an idea on how to solve this? Is this the intended behavior or it's just a small bug?

  Thanks in advance for your answers.

  Another workaround solution seems to be to wrap the labels into groups and spin groups. If you don't have enough space in the grid, although bad things happen.

  import javafx.application.Application;
  import javafx.scene.Group;
  import javafx.scene.Scene;
  import javafx.scene.control.Control;
  import javafx.scene.control.Label;
  import javafx.scene.layout.GridPane;
  import javafx.scene.layout.RowConstraints;
  import javafx.stage.Stage;
  
  public class RotatedLabelsInGrid extends Application {
  
    @Override
    public void start(Stage primaryStage) {
       final GridPane root = new GridPane();
       root.setHgap(5);
       root.setVgap(5);
  
       final String letters = "ABCDEF" ;
       final int numRows = 4  ;
  
       for (int col = 0; col < letters.length(); col++) {
           for (int row = 1; row <= numRows; row++) {
               Label label = new Label("Item "+letters.substring(col, col+1)+row);
               Group group = new Group();
               group.getChildren().add(label);
               group.setRotate(90);
               root.add(group, col, row-1);
           }
       }
  
       final RowConstraints rowConstraints = new RowConstraints(100, Control.USE_COMPUTED_SIZE, 200);
       for (int i=0; i		   

• Strange behavior of validation with the fields 'user entered - required '.

  I have a situation where I have a form with several 'user entered - required"text fields  Some required fields are pre-populated by a server process before being presented to a user in the workspace.  When the user fills the remaining fields and submits the form (by clicking the button "Done" in the workspace), the of standard validation 'required' message, even if all required fields contain data.

  The shape where I discovered this problem is moderately complex, so I built a form simple and process to try to understand what is happening.  The simple form contains exactly two text fields, both are user entered - required.  A field is filled by a server process when the task of the associated workspace is called, B field must be filled in by the user.  There is no script customized beyond the bridge of form and a Submit button.  It's about as simple as it gets.

  If the field is filled, and then the user fills B field and click on 'Finish', the message appears saying 'at least one required field is empty... "even if the two fields contain data.

  If I return to the form and remove the B field (and redeploy the form and remember the process), to field is pre-filled and the user clicks on 'Finish', no message is displayed and the form is sent.

  As far as I know, the built-in for required fields validation works correctly only if all fields are pre-filled or none of them are pre-filled.

  Can someone explain what is happening?

  EDIT: I forgot to mention, I also created and configured an extract of the data for the simple form.  The data preview only contains a value for the to field.  When displayed in the preview of the Designer tab, everything works as expected.

  After a little work I have a better understanding of what is happening and a solution.  I have scripted several calls to xfa.host.messageBox (...) on different events.  It turns out that the pre-filled fields are not the culprit - they have values as expected.  The problem is with the non-pre-filled fields, and and a subtle behavior of the event model that causes a problem when using the workspace INTERFACE (at least on SS3).  Field values may not be resolved until a field loses focus (for example when a user moves to another field, or click a button).  Form used outside of the workspace, by clicking a "submit" button causes the focus to move to the button, which causes the values to be bound to the fields.

  Solution: Use an indirect Submit on the form button and submit indirect click handler used (in addition to your normal code):

  xfa.host.setFocus(null);
  xfa.resolveNode("[[fully qualified name of the real submit button]]").execEvent("click");
  

  Working space should detect and then make an Indirect button and run the associated click Manager, claiming in turn the form submit true button.

  This is where begins the next bit of fun: there is a bug in the form bridge (at least in the ES3 version) code prevents him from indirect detection submit buttons when you use JavaScript as a language Manager click of the button and

  Here is my hack to solve this issue:

  1. Open the 'ContainerFoundation_JS' script in the Script of Designer Editor
  2. Ignore the warning at the top of the file
  3. Find the named function: isIndirectSubmitEvent (it's on the line 1512 or something)
  4. Change the line that reads:

     • if (script.indexOf(button.name + ".execEvent") != -1) {
       

       TO:

       if (script.indexOf(button.name + ".execEvent") != -1 || script.indexOf(button.name + "\").execEvent") != -1) {
       

  5. Save and deploy the form

  If there is a better way to achieve this, please share.

• Strange behavior when creating a composite with ' without validating key. '

  Hi all
  
  It's very strange for me. Can you please tell me where I am wrong.
  
  I want to create a composite key for the combination "INT_ID" and "STO_ID" columns in the table "act_ord". because this table contains already more entries in double for this combination, I decided to use 'enable novalidate' to skip validation for records duplicate already existing while creating constraints. But I get the following error "ORA-02260: table can have only one primary key" executing the below statement 1.1. If I create a 1 column with option novalidate constraint means, its working fine.
  

  1.1 Not working:- Giving error ORA-02260: table can have only one primary key
  ALTER TABLE ACT_ORD ADD CONSTRAINT PK_INT_ORD
   PRIMARY KEY   (INT_ID,STO_ID) enable novalidate 

  1.2 Working without any error:
  ALTER TABLE SPL_VAS.ACT_ORDER ADD CONSTRAINT PK_INT_STO_ORD
   PRIMARY KEY   (INT_ID) enable novalidate

  Is there a limitation of use 'enable novalidate' with the creation of composite primary key?
  
  Please take the necessary steps and make your suggestions.
  
  Kind regards
  Jame

  It is clear to me why you get this error. Here's a unit test where I get a different error (more logical).

  Note: to do this, you must first create a NON-unique index on the columns that you want to be in the primary key. Then use the clause for INDEXING to HELP when you add the primary key.

  SQL> create table test (i number not null, j number not null);
  
  Table created.
  
  SQL> insert into test values(0,0);
  
  1 row created.
  
  SQL> insert into test values(0,0);
  
  1 row created.
  
  SQL> commit;
  
  Commit complete.
  
  SQL> select *  from test;
  More...
  
           I          J
  ---------- ----------
           0          0
           0          0
  
  2 rows selected.
  
  SQL> alter table test add primary key (i,j) enable novalidate;
  alter table test add primary key (i,j) enable novalidate
  *
  ERROR at line 1:
  ORA-02437: cannot validate (TOON.SYS_C0028830) - primary key violated
  
  SQL> create index my_pk_index on test(i,j);
  
  Index created.
  
  SQL> alter table test add primary key (i,j) using index my_pk_index enable novalidate;
  
  Table altered.
  
  SQL> insert into test values(1,1);
  
  1 row created.
  
  SQL> insert into test values(1,1);
  insert into test values(1,1)
  *
  ERROR at line 1:
  ORA-00001: unique constraint (TOON.SYS_C0028831) violated
  
  SQL>
  

• Behavior of DW - validate the form

  I added the behavior when the user clicks the button, it validates the form using the behavior of DW. In the two browsers I use, (Firefox 2 and IE 7), the alert comes up saying some fields are required, but in Internet Explorer after clicking on OK, it operates a pass to the action of the form. In Firefox, it remains on the page so that you can enter the required fields.
  
  Link to page
  
  Any help is appreciated,
  Alastair Q

  You have applied the behavior for the Send button - it must be applied to
  the

  tag.

  --
  Murray - ICQ 71997575
  Adobe Community Expert
  (If you * MUST * write me, don't don't LAUGH when you do!)
  ==================
  http://www.projectseven.com/go - DW FAQs, tutorials & resources
  http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs, tutorials & resources
  ==================

  "AlastairQ" wrote in message
  News:fohetu$2hg$1@forums. Macromedia.com...
  > I've added the behavior when the user clicks the button, it
  > valid
  > the form using the behavior of DW. In the two browsers I use, (Firefox 2 &)
  > IE
  > 7), the alert comes up saying some fields are mandatory, but in IE after
  > you
  > click OK, it operates a pass to the action of the form. In Firefox, it
  > stays
  > on the page, so you can enter the required fields.
  >
  > http://www.dev.alastairq.co.uk/future/form.php
  >
  > Any help is appreciated.
  > Alastair Q
  >

• Strange behavior of scroll on the façade

  Hello

  I have a vi that produces strange things: I activated all the scroll bars on the properties of VI, but I do not have yet in edit mode until I click on 'tile left-right Up-down' and then resize to full screen.

  What can be the cause of this behavior?

  Thank you

  (I have attached the vi issues)

  I have no problem with scrollbars in 2013 of LV. Everything works immediately.

  But I have a problem with the block diagram: it is very large and contains code that is not stoppable (while loop with constant False!)

  Norbert