sum of hierarchy

Similar Questions

• Get the sum of all Member of a hierarchy.

  Hello
  I want to get the sum of each Member in a hierarchy.
  The hierarchy is defined in the strdet table:

  create table strdet
  
  (costcenterms varchar2(20),     // parent
  
   costcenterdet varchar2(20),    // child
  
   lev varchar2(1))

  The values for each object/material by costcenter (child) is defined in the details_det table:

  create table details_det
  
  (costcenterms varchar2(20),
  
   eppid varchar2(30) ,
  
   purchcontyear0 number(4,1) )

  Some examples of data:

  insert into strdet values ('1' , '1.1','2')
  
  /
  
  insert into strdet values ('1' , '1.2','2')
  
  /
  
  insert into strdet values ('1.1' , '1.1.1','3')
  
  /
  
  insert into strdet values ('1.1' , '1.1.2','3')
  
  /
  
  insert into strdet values ('1.2' , '1.2.1','3')
  
  /
  
  insert into strdet values ('1.2' , '1.2.2','3')
  
  /
  
  insert into strdet values ('1.2' , '1.2.3','3')
  
  /
  
  insert into strdet values ('1.1.1' , '1.1.1.1','4')
  
  /
  
  insert into strdet values ('1.1.1' , '1.1.1.2','4')
  
  /
  
  insert into strdet values ('1.1.2' , '1.1.2.1','4')
  
  /
  
  insert into strdet values ('1.2.1' , '1.2.1.1','4')
  
  /
  
  insert into strdet values ('1.2.1' , '1.2.1.2','4')
  
  /
  
  COMMIT;

  insert into details_det values('1.1.1.1','epp1',10);
  
  insert into details_det values('1.1.1.1','epp2',20);
  
  insert into details_det values('1.1.1.1','epp3',0);
  
  insert into details_det values('1.1.1.2','epp1',0);
  
  insert into details_det values('1.1.2.1','epp2',5);
  
  insert into details_det values('1.1.2.1','epp4',15);
  
  insert into details_det values('1.2.1.1','epp1',65);
  
  insert into details_det values('1.2.1.1','epp2',95);
  
  insert into details_det values('1.2.1.2','epp1',5);
  
  commit;

  The desired sql stmt output should be like this:

  costcenter             val
  
  --------------             ------
  
  1                        220 
  
  1.1                       55
  
  1.2                     165
  
  1.1.1                    30
  
  1.1.2                    20
  
  1.2.1                  165

  I wrote the following, so far...

  SQL> select distinct s.costcenterms , sum(purchcontyear0) over(partition by s.costcenterms order by s.costcenterms)
  
    2        from details_det d , strdet s
  
    3        where s.costcenterdet=d.costcenterms(+)
  
    4        start with s.costcenterms='1'
  
    5             connect by  s.costcenterms = prior s.costcenterdet
  
    6        order by s.costcenterms
  
    7  /
  
   
  
  COSTCENTERMS                                                 SUM(PURCHCONTYEAR0)OVER(PARTIT
  
  ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------
  
  1.2                                                          
  
  1.2.1                                                                                   165
  
  1.1.1                                                                                    30
  
  1.1.2                                                                                    20
  
  1                                                            
  
  1.1                                                          
  
   
  
  6 rows selected

  How should I modify the above sql stmt to get the result you want...?
  
  Note: I use OracleDB 10 g. v.2
  
  Thank you very much
  SIM

  sgalaxy wrote:
  Anyway, since I want to use the sql stmt to define a materialized view, all versions of data of hierarchical queries are not allowed... (oracle ora-30361 error...).

  No error on my:

  Connected to:
  Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
  With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options
  
  SQL> create materialized view x_mv
    2  as
    3  select  grp,
    4          sum(purchcontyear0)
    5    from  (
    6           select  connect_by_root s.costcenterms grp,
    7                   d.purchcontyear0
    8             from  strdet s,
    9                   details_det d
   10                   where s.costcenterdet=d.costcenterms(+)
   11                   connect by s.costcenterms = prior s.costcenterdet
   12          )
   13    group by grp
   14  /
  
  Materialized view created.
  
  SQL> select  *
    2    from  x_mv
    3    order by grp
    4  /
  
  GRP                  SUM(PURCHCONTYEAR0)
  -------------------- -------------------
  1                                    215
  1.1                                   50
  1.1.1                                 30
  1.1.2                                 20
  1.2                                  165
  1.2.1                                165
  
  6 rows selected.
  
  SQL> 
  

  SY.

• A slightly different running sum in a query of the hierarchy

  Hello
  
  I've stuck with this problem for some time, so pls help:
  
  I'm basically trying rollup/aggregate values from the lower level nodes for the upper level nodes in a hierarchy. But this aggregate is a little different from a simple cumulative values.
  
  create the table ent_rel (parent number, number of children, number of child_amount);
  
  insert into ent_rel
  Select null, 100, the double null
  Union all select 100, 101, the double null
  the Union all select 101, 102, 20 of the double
  Union all select 102, 103, the double null
  Union all select 103, 104, the double null
  Union all select 104, 105, the double null
  the Union all select 105, 106, 40 of the double
  Union all select 106, 107, the double null
  the Union all select 107, 108, 20 of the double
  the Union all select 107, 109, 10 of the double
  Union all select 101, 203, the double null
  the Union all select 203, 205, 50 of the double
  Union all select 205, 207, the double null
  Union all select 207, 209, the double null
  the Union all select 209, 210, 10 of the double
  ;
  
  commit;
  
  Select RPAD (' ', (LEVEL - 1) * 2, '-'). child child
  level
  child_amount
  of ent_rel
  Start with the parent is set to null
  connect by prior child = parent
  
  CHILD_AMOUNT LEVEL CHILD
  --------------------------------- ------ -------------
  1 100
  --101 2
  ---102 3 20
  ---103 4
  ---104 5
  ---105 6
  ---106 7 40
  ---107 8
  ---108 9-20
  ---109 9 10
  ---203 3
  ---205 4 50
  ---207 5
  ---209 6
  ---210 7 10
  
  Now, I need a SQL query or even a simple PL/SQL code to get the field DESIRED_AMOUNT as shown below:
  
  Please note that there could be many more branches parallel to a node, but I kept simple just to get the concept.
  
  DESIRED_AMOUNT CHILD_AMOUNT LEVEL CHILD
  --------------------------------- ------ ------------- --------------
  100 1 70
  --101 2 70
  ---102 3 20 20
  ---103 4-40
  ---104 5 40
  ---105 6 40
  ---106 7 40 40
  ---107 8 30
  ---108 9 20 20
  ---109 9 10 10
  ---203 3 50
  ---205 4 50 50
  ---207 5 10
  ---209 6 10
  ---210 7 10 10
  
  Thank you very much in advance.
  
  Thank you and best regards,
  In.
  

• Formula member to sum based on a model

  Hello

  I have a question by creating a formula for a sum based on a model member.

  In a cube, OSI, we have 2 sparse dimensions, which contains a hierarchy of alternative with shared members. There is a hierarchy of high maintenance new shared members are added each month.

  I would like to remove this successor to the shared members hierarchy and replace it with a formula of Member.  This hierarchy looks like this

  Entity CC01 Summation

  CC-01-100

  CC-01-101

  CC-01-111

  etc.

  I tried to add a member formula that corresponds to this model @MATCH ('Entity', ' CC-01 * ") and summarizes all CC - 01 *.  My formula looks like this @SUM (@MATCH ('Entity', ' CC-01 * ")).  It does not work.  She added a few other totals which I have not yet studied.

  Any idea is appreciated...

  Thank you.

  Hello

  It is not necessary to take the name of the dimension of the mbrname. @MATCH (mbrName | genName | levName, 'boss')

  Take the parent where the search should begin here. So, without other hierarchies.

  It should work.

  Kind regards

  Philip Hulsebosch

• Can I refer to a rangelist in a hierarchy of shared member?

  I would like to make the sum of a series of accounts based on one hierarchy, not the main hierarchy.  In the hierarchy of the main, they are 1,5,4,3,2, and in the alt hierarchy, they are shared in the good order of 1,2,3,4,5.  If I reference the rank 1:3, how can you ensure that I get 1,2,3,4 and not 1,5,4,3?

  Background:

  Basically, I'm trying to map a sum of numerical range of account numbers in general ledger to another account of management based on the members of the other 2 dimensions.  The main problem I have is that, as I have not found the function that can sort in alphanumeric order a list within a selection of members, and my GL accounts are not in the order in the hierarchy of main due to a reorganization of their parents, I loaded as a sorted list of platform of shared to another hierarchy members.  Now, I just @LIST (1:3, [the optional to use as reference parent node]) function.  I guess another way of asking the question might be: how to reference the member names in Essbase as digital beaches as you would in an ERP?

  Maybe there is another way and I approach it all wrong?

  Essbase v11.1.2.3.507 (under planning)

  So what you really want is to extract all accounts with a number between e.g. 1 and 4 (even if the same parent has other children of 5, 6, 7 and so on)?

  @BETWEEN would do in this case.

• Beginner problems - how to make the sum of the lists in a drop-down table

  Hello

  Please forgive my newness but I'm creating a table with 10 + lines and columns and need to calculate the sum of the columns. The user must select a number from a drop-down list and I would like to summarize these nbumbers at the bottom of the column, seems simple enough...

  I have named each cell in the links tab but can't seem to find the script of the sum on the right. I just started using livecycle and have had a good experience so far.

  I wish it was like excel where you just need to click or highlight the cells you want to summarize and do with it but I can't seem to find the easy button...

  You can not simply highlight a column, name it and then use that name in a script to sum?

  Thanks a lot for all the help and I have looked around, but can't get a grip on this one, so I apologize if this is requested before.

  Go easy on me.

  You have to be very accurate with referencing the fields or the formulas will not work. If you have renamed the fields of their default values, then you should reference them as you named the.

  Here's an example of my hierarchy, called as you explained:

  

  In this case, the use of scripts on the Total field will look like this:

  this.rawValue = (Row1.A1.rawValue * 1) + (Row2.B1.rawValue * 1) + (Row3.C1.rawValue * 1) + (Row4.D1.rawValue * 1);

  So that when I switch to preview, it behaves correctly:

  

• query rewite enable cube + jump level hierarchy problem

  Hello
  
  can someone help me on the following scenario, please?
  
  (I use OWB 11.2 client on WIN XP)
  
  I just created a dimension, i.e. dim_1 with three levels (l1, l2 and l3) with the ' ROLAP: with Cube MV ' storage option. the business identifier is of type number named 'key '. The standard hierarchy of the dimension is
  by default except that I have defined L1 level as him "jump at the level" of the L3 level. As I'd hoped associates the modified dimension table so that the key added to level L3 as his parents another level L1.
  
  Then I designed a map of ETL to load the following values:
  Hierarchy (Default): L1-L2-L3 > >
  Keychain attr. : 1-> 2-> 3
  and
  hierarchy (using hierarchical): L1-L3 >
  Keychain attr. : 1 > 4
  
  
  
  This means that the '1' L1 button is parent of key '3' or '4' of L3.
  Then I created a single dimension cube with the "ROLAP: with the Cube of MV" storage option. The only measure of the cube is named "N" of type number. The level of the dimension of the cube is L3 as a default value. Then I designed a mapping of ETL to load following values in this measure:
  « N » - « L3 ». "" Key.
  __________________
  1 - 3
  2 - 4
  
  When I update the related materialized view of the cube it does return no rows.
  
  * 1. why what is happening? *
  
  But when firstly, I refresh the MV associated with the dimension, and then refresh the cube MV, it returns the following incorrect result:
  Level.Key - N - County
  ___________________________
  L2.2 - 2-1
  L1.1 - 2-1
  
  The correct result should be:
  
  Level.Key - N - County
  ___________________________
  L2.2 - 1-1
  L1.1 - 3-2
  
  * 2. why what is happening? *
  
  When I got Disabling query rewrite of the cube, then there is no need to be refreshed dimension MV first. Refreshing Cube MV returns the following results about:
  
  Level.Key - N - County
  ___________________________
  L2.2 - 1-1
  L1.1 - 3-2
  L2. -2-1
  
  * 3.Is it bound to the ENABLE QUERY REWRITE of cube MV property? *
  
  Thanks in advance,
  
  SMSK.

  Command is not supported in cube MVs, see the documentation for OLAP;
  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E11882_01/OLAP.112/e17123/cubes.htm#CHDHBGGB

  A cube must conform to these requirements, before it can be referred to as a cube materialized view:
  * All the dimensions of the cube have at least a level and a level-based hierarchy. Ragged and non-hierarchical hierarchies are not supported. The dimensions should be mapped.
  * All dimensions in the cube using the same aggregation operator, which is SUM, MIN, or MAX.
  * The cube has one or more dimensions and one or more measures.
  * The cube is fully defined and mapped. For example, if the cube has five steps, then all five are mapped to the source tables.
  * The data for the cube type is NUMBER, VARCHAR2, NVARCHAR2, or DATE.
  * Source detail tables support dimension and count constraints. If they have not been defined, then use the Advisor to relational schema to generate a script that defines on detail charts.
  * The cube is compressed.
  * The cube can be accompanied by calculated measures, but he can not support analytics more advanced in the cube script.

  See you soon
  David

• Hierarchical queries with Rollup sum (CONNECTED BY GROUP BY ROLLUP)

  Hi all
  
  Imagine the following scenario: I have an ACCOUNT table that contains the accounts and their hierarchy (currently 5 levels) and a BALANCE table that holds the record for the balance of the accounts. Only CHILD accounts (level 5) have records in the table for BALANCE. Simple example:

  CREATE TABLE accounts (account_code VARCHAR2(30), parent_account VARCHAR2(30), account_desc VARCHAR2(400));
  CREATE TABLE balances (account_code VARCHAR2(30), balance_amount NUMBER(18,2));
  INSERT INTO ACCOUNTS VALUES ('TOT',NULL,'Total');
  INSERT INTO ACCOUNTS VALUES ('ANA1','TOT','General Expenses');
  INSERT INTO ACCOUNTS VALUES ('4801001','ANA1','Small Expenses');
  INSERT INTO ACCOUNTS VALUES ('4801002','ANA1','Transportation');
  INSERT INTO ACCOUNTS VALUES ('ANA2','TOT','Health Expenses');
  INSERT INTO ACCOUNTS VALUES ('4802001','ANA2','Healthcare');
  INSERT INTO ACCOUNTS VALUES ('4802002','ANA2','Facilities');
  
  
  INSERT INTO BALANCES VALUES ('4801001', 2000);
  INSERT INTO BALANCES VALUES ('4801002', 1000);
  INSERT INTO BALANCES VALUES ('4802001', 3000);
  INSERT INTO BALANCES VALUES ('4802002', 4000);

  What I need in this scenario is to run a hierarchical query, where each node, I calculate the sum of all its children (in TERMINAL nodes that are child accounts, this amount is the value of the balances itself). End result would be:
  

  TOT -> 10000
    ANA1 -> 3000
      4801001 -> 2000
      4801001 -> 1000
    ANA2 -> 7000
      4802001 -> 3000
      4802002 -> 4000

  I tried many ways and found a solution that works for a fixed amount of levels, basically he built the hierarchy and calculates the SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH, then divides it as a regular expression and using GROUP BY ROLLUP to calculate the highest levels. Then I assemble again, now with the calculated values. Here's the example query:
  

  select level
      , NVL (vfinal.child_account,'TOTAL') ||' - '||
                          ( SELECT account_desc
                              FROM accounts 
                             WHERE account_code = vfinal.child_acct ) account_name
  
       , to_char(sum_bal, 'fm999g999g999g990') as rolled_up_balance
    from 
  (
  select coalesce( princ.lvl3, princ.lvl2, princ.lvl1 ) child_acct
       , DECODE ( princ.lvl2 , NULL 
                                   , NULL 
                                   , DECODE ( princ.conta_lvl3, NULL
                                   , princ.conta_lvl1,princ.conta_lvl2 ) ) parent_acct
       , sum(princ.balance_amount) sum_bal
  from (
  select hier.lvl1
       , hier.lvl2
       , hier.lvl3
       , hier.parent_account
       , hier.account_code child_acc
       , bal.balance_amount
    from ( select level  
                , sys_connect_by_path( account_code, '/' ) hierarchy_acct
                , REGEXP_SUBSTR(sys_connect_by_path( account_code, '/' ),'[^/]+',1,3) lvl3
                , REGEXP_SUBSTR(sys_connect_by_path( account_code, '/' ),'[^/]+',1,2) lvl2
                , REGEXP_SUBSTR(sys_connect_by_path( account_code, '/' ),'[^/]+',1,1) lvl1
                , account_code
                , parent_account  
             from accounts acc
             where level <= 3
             start with parent_account is null
             connect by nocycle prior account = parent_account
             order siblings by parent_account
             ) hier
        , balances  bal
    where bal.cod_conta  = hier.account_code
  ) princ
  where princ.lvl1 is not null
  group by rollup ( princ.lvl1
                  , princ.lvl2
                  , princ.lvl3 )
  
  order by princ.conta_lvl1
         , princ.conta_lvl2
         , princ.conta_lvl3
  ) vfinal
  where child_acct is not null
  start with parent_acct is null
  connect by nocycle prior child_acct = parent_acct

  All is said and done, what I need is to do the same thing for infinite levels, because this query has 3 fixed levels. Do you know how can I structure a new query where, regardless of the number of levels, amounts of parent are all wound like that?
  
  Thank you very much in advance! Best regards!
  Thiago
  
  Published by: Thiago Sep 6, 2011 11:31
  
  Published by: Thiago Sep 6, 2011 13:01

  select  account_code,
          (
           select  sum(balance_amount)
             from  accounts a2,
                   balances b
             where b.account_code(+) = a2.account_code
             start with a2.account_code = a1.account_code
             connect by a2.parent_account = prior a2.account_code
          ) balance_amount
    from  accounts a1
  /
  
  ACCOUNT_CODE    BALANCE_AMOUNT
  --------------- --------------
  TOT                      10000
  ANA1                      3000
  4801001                   3000
  4801002
  ANA2                      7000
  4802001                   7000
  4802002
  
  7 rows selected.
  
  SQL> 
  

  SY.

• A rendering based on a hierarchy level group

  Hello
  I am faced with a request that I would like a report based on the selection of a group hierarchy level.
  
  Here's the situation: I have a table with a 'normal' hierarchy, said the Scott, with his EMPNO and MGR columns EMP table. What I would like to have is a report that gives me the sum of the column group SAL by all members at a given level. So, if I choose the LEVEL = 1, Id like to see the total number if I choose LEVEL = 2, I would like to see the sum of the salary of all employees managed by the respective Manager etc..
  
  I know that there are opportunities to denormalize the table first and try to solve it from there, but I want to know is if everyone is aware of a more generic way to achieve this? I could accept is a limitation hardcoded the number of nested levels, as seems to be very difficult to achieve in SQL.
  
  In the real world scenario, I use only balanced trees, so from this point of view, the reports will be compatible.
  
  Any ideas?
  
  Thanks, Jürgen

  http://www.orafaq.com/node/55

  analytical functions will answer your questions...

• To calculate the sum Vals and LV is higher than its target line LV

  When I answered this thread of application of the hierarchy and the number of subnodes
  I made this question.
  
  I use Oracle11gR2.
  
  I want the sum Vals and LV is superior to his LV of the target line to the command by sorkKey.
  Ex if LV 2, sumVal is the sum of this line and another line which LV > 2.
  

  MyTable
  sortKey  LV  Val
  -------  --  ---
        1   2   10
        3   3   20
        5   4   30
        6   3   40
        7   4   50
        9   2   60
       15   3   70
       16   4   80

  with MyTable(sortKey,LV,Val) as(
  select  1,2,10 from dual union
  select  3,3,20 from dual union
  select  5,4,30 from dual union
  select  6,3,40 from dual union
  select  7,4,50 from dual union
  select  9,2,60 from dual union
  select 15,3,70 from dual union
  select 16,4,80 from dual)

  expected Output
  sortKey  LV  Val  sumVal
  -------  --  ---  ------
        1   2   10     150   (10+20+30+40+50)
        3   3   20      50   (20+30)
        5   4   30      30   (30)
        6   3   40      90   (40+50)
        7   4   50      50   (50)
        9   2   60     210   (60+70+80)
       15   3   70     150   (70+80)
       16   4   80      80   (80)

  If you use subQuerys, the solution is below.
  But it's very complex :-(
  My question is "is it more simple solution?
  For ex using fuction OLAP, model clause etc...
  

  with MyTable(sortKey,LV,Val) as(
  select  1,2,10 from dual union
  select  3,3,20 from dual union
  select  5,4,30 from dual union
  select  6,3,40 from dual union
  select  7,4,50 from dual union
  select  9,2,60 from dual union
  select 15,3,70 from dual union
  select 16,4,80 from dual)
  select sortKey,LV,Val,
  (select sum(b.Val)
     from MyTable b
    where a.sortKey <= b.sortKey
      and b.sortKey <
          (select nvl(min(c.sortKey),99999)
             from MyTable c
            where c.sortKey > a.sortKey
              and c.LV <= a.LV)) as sumVal
    from MyTable a;

  In fact, it can be simpler:

  with t as (
             select  1 sortkey,2 lv,10 val from dual union all
             select  3,3,20 from dual union all
             select  5,4,30 from dual union all
             select  6,3,40 from dual union all
             select  7,4,50 from dual union all
             select  9,2,60 from dual union all
             select 15,3,70 from dual union all
             select 16,4,80 from dual
            )
  select  sortkey,
          lv,
          val,
          sum(val) over(order by sortkey range between current row and rng following) sumval
    from  (
           select  sortkey,
                   lv,
                   val,
                   nvl(
                       (select min(b.sortkey) from t b where b.sortkey > a.sortkey and b.lv <= a.lv) - a.sortkey - 1,
                       max(sortkey) over() - a.sortkey
                      ) rng
             from  t a
           )
    order by sortkey
  /
  
     SORTKEY         LV        VAL     SUMVAL
  ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
           1          2         10        150
           3          3         20         50
           5          4         30         30
           6          3         40         90
           7          4         50         50
           9          2         60        210
          15          3         70        150
          16          4         80         80
  
  8 rows selected.
  
  SQL> 
  

  SY.

• calculation of Salary to the top or to the bottom of the hierarchy

  Hello all,.
  
  How to get the total salary wound of lower level to a higher level of the hierarchy?
  
  We can get the hierarchy of the employee and the salary of hr.employees table using the suite of applications:
  

  select level, last_name, salary
  
  from hr.employees
  
  start with employee_id = (select employee_id
  
                                       from  hr.employees
  
                                       where manager_id IS NULL
  
                                      )
  
  connect by prior employee_id  = manager_id

  How to get the salary rolled up to a higher level with sql as follows?
  

  level      last_name        salary        total salary
  
  
  
  2         Kochhar           17000          109800
  
  3         Whalen              4400            4400
  
  3         Mavris                6500            6500
  
  3         Bae                 10000           10000
  
  3         Higgins             12000          20300
  
  4             Gietz              8300           8300
  
  3         Greenberg        12000          51600
  
  4            Faviet             9000            9000
  
  4            Chen              8200            8200
  
  4            Sciarra            7700             7700
  
  4            Urman            7800             7800
  
  4            Popp              6900             6900 

  Here all level 4 level 3 Greenberg rolled up to level 3, then level 4 under Higgins rolled up to level 3, then all the level 3 under Kochar wrapped at level 2.
  
  Is it possible in sql?
  
  Thanks for your help.
  
  Edited by: rxshah May 14, 2010 03:45

  (B-)

  select level, last_name, salary,
  (select sum(b.salary) from hr.employees b
   start with b.employee_id=a.employee_id
   connect by prior b.employee_id  = b.manager_id)
  from hr.employees a
  start with employee_id = (select employee_id
                                       from  hr.employees
                                       where manager_id IS NULL
                                      )
  connect by prior employee_id  = manager_id;
  

• OBIEE BI answers: measures bad aggregation at the top level of the hierarchy

  Hi all,
  I have the following problem. I hope to be clear in my English because it is somewhat complicated to explain.
  
  I did following:
  
  ID of drugs classified in quantity
  1 9
  2 4
  1 3
  2 2
  
  and drugs following table:
  
  Drug brand Id brand Description drug whose active ingredient Id drug whose active principle Description
  Aulin Nimesulide 1 1
  2 Asprina 2 Acetilsalicilico
  
  In AWM, I've defined a Dimension of drugs based on the following hierarchy: drug whose active ingredient (parent) - brand name of medication (sheet) mapped as Description:
  
  The active ingredient of drug = drug Active ingredient Id of my Table of drugs (pharmaceutical = Description of the active ingredient LONG DESCRIPTION attribute)
  Pharmaceutical brand Description = drug brand Id of my drugs Table (LONG DESCRIPTION = Description of drug brand attribute)
  
  Indeed, in my cube, I have traced pharmaceutical leaf-level brand Description = Id of the drug of my fact table. In AWM drugs Dimension is mapped as Sum aggregation operator
  
  If I select on answers drug whose active ingredient (parent of my hierarchy) and the quantity, in my view, after the result
  
  Description of the active ingredient drugs classified in quantity
  Acetilsalicilico 24
  Nimesulide 12
  
  indeed of the correct values
  
  Description of the active ingredient drugs classified in quantity
  Acetilsalicilico 12
  Nimesulide 6
  
  EXACTLY the double! But if I dig drug Description of the active ingredient Acetilsalicilico I can't see correctly:
  
  Drug whose active ingredient Description pharmaceutical brand classified in quantity Description
  Acetilsalicilico
  -12 Aspirina
  Total 12
  
  Aggregation of evil is only at the top level of the hierarchy. The aggregation on the lower level of the hierarchy is correct. Perhaps the answers also amount Total line? Why?
  
  I'm frustrated. I ask your help, please!
  
  Giancarlo

  OK your on 10G but the view of the cube and the obligation to limit the levels in the LTS in the RPD is valid in both.
  I think we found the problem,
  Go to each source logical table this logic table (x 2 in your case you have two levels) and on the content tab, window background ' use this "Clause Where" filter to limit the rows returned. »
  Open the expression builder, locate LEVEL_NAME according to your cube and limit accordingly, it is to say LEVEL_NAME = "BRAND_DESCRTIPION" for the aggregation BRAND_DESCRIPTION LTS and LEVEL_NAME = "XXXX" in detail, SFF, where XXXX is the name of level of hierarchy in your cube for details (leaves) records.

  Can you try that and let us know?
  Thank you
  Alastair

• Formula in the primary account not to ASO dimension hierarchy

  Is this in any way by which I can write a formula in a primary account not dimension hierarchy. I have tagged this member as allowing multiple hierarchies and I can't adjust primary hierarchy as dynamic to ASO. so I put it as stored and now I want to write a formula for one of the members. I'm not able to put the formula for stored dimension.
  
  is there a workaround or can you please suggest me something that might work
  
  Thank you

  You can have formulas in the dimensions (or hierarchies) marked as dynamic. If you have a dynamic hierarchy, you might substitute in there running sums.

• SUM IS INCORRECT

  I have a worksheet and the SUM function gives the wrong number. It's really dangerous because I need precision.

  I deduced that there is a single cell, that it fails to include in the sum, even if the cell is selected.

  I click on the cell, I want to add to the column, then press = and then select the column. The sum is incorrect and fails to add one of the cells

  Why?

  It is so irritating and so dangerous that I need clarification on this sheet of numbers. Never had this with excel.

  Help, please!

  Thank you

  without details, it is difficult to guess.

  Often, the cell is not the same as the other somehow.  Maybe it's in text format, or there's a funny character in the cell.  Try to copy the data to a new table in a new document to check the results.

  If you can validate the data, then we can try too.

• sum of only of positive numbers

  I'm the Dean in a high school and I need to keep track of demerits of the student and served detention.  I created a spreadsheet on the photo below.  As you can see whenever a student gets a demerit, I put it all in a row (date, teacher gives the incapacity, that was the incapacity and how many demerits received for the offence).  So you can imagine the end of the quarter, this worksheet is big enough (400-500 lines). I also put a negative number (-2) when the student uses of detention (a student must serve each received 2 drawbacks.

  I wrote about this formula on this forum almost two years ago.  I have another tab (sheet) that adds up all the disadvantages, so I can go to this (roadmap) tab and see who needs to serve.  The formula a = SUMIF (Sheet1! Header, header, Sheet1H:H) and it works beautifully. This other sheet has our entire student body on it (each student only listed time... If we have a student population of 300 students, it has only 300 lines). We add all the points (even negative), I can see that has more than 2 demerits and who needs to serve.  In the example below, Steve Abrahim would have 0 demerits on the second sheet because he received 4, but also served 4.

  But now, I realize that I need a second tab (sheet) that has the total number of demerits a student receives during the quarter.  Then, I need a formula that sums only positive numbers.  So, once again, this worksheet will have all our student body listed in the column (a student by rank).  On this tab (sheet), Steve Abrahim would be 4 demerits (even if he served two detentions) and Adam Butler would also have four (even if he served only a detention).  Can someone write this formula?

  Please let me know if you need any clarification on my question.

  Thank you

  Mark

  

  = SUMIF (E, ' > = 0 "" ")

  where I think the Points column is E