support for vSphere for Sandy Bridge processors

Similar Questions

• What support for CSS pre-processor?

  I like that Adobe all these improvements in the areas of HTML / CSS / JS / etc. but the CSS preprocessors are becoming the way to 'do things' and is where I cringe when I have to use Dreamweaver and now recently Code dashboard. If Adobe is the future, why not start to including support for CSS preprocessors (more needed SASS and LESS)?

  Hello Zach,

  It is probably fair to say LESS, it's a slightly higher priority to the core team of media, for at least two reasons: media itself is constructed using LESS, and CodeMirror (the widget open source we are based on) supports LESS out of the box, but no SASS code coloring.

  That said, keep in mind that it is a project open source, so nobody should be beholden to our priorities.  If someone is adding SASS support, please feel free to encode it to the top and send us a patch! :-)  The best place to start would probably be coloring, code that is all that we currently support at LEAST up to now.

  But beyond the simple code coloring, an important question is: what would that consider you 'support' at LEAST or SASS?  For example:

  • Features to automatically compile down to CSS for you (when recording, or perhaps via an explicit command)
  • Live support overview installation LESS / SASS (similar to what we now support for CSS)
  • Fast Edition (the clever inline editor function) supports showing LESS / SASS code for a given (similar to CSS today) HTML tag
  • Indicators of CSS properties/values within code / SASS code (similar to the simple code reference we could provide for CSS)
  • Specific features LESS/SASS - like indicators of code of mixin names/settings or change fast feature to view the definition of a mixin like a snippet of code inline.

  Each one is a function that requires effort, so more input we * may get you guys on what matters more, better we give a how soon work on that.

  * And by 'we' I mean not only Adobe / in the heart of the hooks team, but also anyone else who is interested in joining the project in brackets!

  -Peter

• Dynamic Cluster migration "Haswell" Intel and Intel 'Sandy Bridge' Cluster

  Hi all

  Need your help on this, on our below, we have two clusters ClusterA (EVC mode is Intel Haswell) and focus (EVC mode is Intel Sandy Bridge), the current problem we are facing right now is that we can not migrate from VM direct of clusterA to b, but successful once we stop the virtual machine and migrate to b. Webcam live migration of VM of focus to ClusterA now question. My question is, is there a way that we can migrate from VM direct ClusterA to b without changing the mode of the VCA on the two hosts?

  Details of home:

  Group A:
  CPU: Intel Xeon CPU E5-2698 V3 2.30 Ghz
  RAM: 256 GB
  EVC: Intel "Haswell" generation

  
  

  Group b:

  CPU: Intel Xeon CPU 2.6 Ghz E5-2670

  RAM: 256 GB

  EVC: Intel 'Sandy Bridge' generation

  If a processor can support level VCA XN, it can also support XN-1 to Xlevels 0. For example, a processor that supports Intel EVC baseline 'Sandy Bridge' generation has a level of EVC of L4. Therefore, it can also support VCA L0, L1, L3 and L2 levels. However, he cannot bear VCA level L5, which corresponds to the generation of Intel®'s "Ivy Bridge'. Intel EVC baselines are listed in table 1.1.

  Ref: KB VMware: best vMotion compatibility (EVC) processor support

  Thus, virtual machines that are running in your focus (EVC mode is Intel Sandy Bridge), should be able to move freely (vMotion) to b (mode of EVC is Intel Sandy Bridge) to ClusterA (EVC mode is Intel Haswell) and A to B provided that the virtual machine that is in your Cluster B vMotioned while in Group A and A is not in the power Cycle, if you put it off and on again then it will be new pickup EVC mode, otherwise it will continue to work with his original mode of VCA.

  But if you take the case of the virtual machines running within your group, those who can not be vMotioned to group B, because they are running with mode higher CVS, canoe taken to lower VCA as live migration, you can migrate cold (power off and move)

  Ideally if you want to reach vMotion compatibility between the two clusters, you must set the VCA mode for each group for Intel Sandy Bridge. But like asking you if you won't change EVC mode at all, the solution proposed would be

  Turned off of the virtual machines in your A group phase by phase, turn cold migration from Group B, there and let the fashion of these machines virtual micro Cluster B EVC, then move them again in A Cluster, in short to realize all the VM in EVC of Cluster B mode. But you will always be in the face of challenge then if VM through the feeding cycle while in Group A, it will pickup Haswell VCA mode and you will lose compatibility vMotion for this virtual machine on cluster again.

  so, what you're asking can be done using method above, but better would be to have two clusters in the VCA mode even if you don't have to worry about power cycles.

  Note: You need to use vSphere Web Client.

• Satellite P750 - 10 c: HARD drive slows down - Sandy Bridge Cougar problem?

  Hello

  I have problem with my notebook Satellite P750 - 10 c with S/N: 4B478828K.
  When I enabled AHCI in the BIOS, computer slows diametrically, day after day was worste and worste, so I tried to change from AHCI to IDE and it helped a little, but is still not good.

  I tried to restore my system, but it did not help.
  I read that Intel has released a version tapped for Sandy Bridge chipset, I have (HM65) SATA 3Gbs problem (I just checked in HD Tune and HARD drive is connected to the port of 3Gbs), so I think I got bugged version.

  My laptop is not guaranteed, but Intel said they changed valid version, so where do I return my phone to fix.

  Kind regards
  Tomek

  > I read that Intel launched buggy version of the chipset for Sandy Bridge.
  The problem was a Cougar Point of Sandy Bridge chipset and not the main processor Sandy Bridge.

  In addition Intel said that this issue affected only the SATA 2 to 5 and not ports 0 and 1.
  Most laptops use only two devices SATA (HDD/SSD and ODD) using the affected ports 0 and 1.
  That is why I think that your problem could be linked to the issue of Cougar Point the Sandy Bridge chipset.

  By the way: not all Intel Sandy Bridge chipsets have been affected.

  Regarding your question:
  Usually if AHCI is enabled, the HARD drive must use the performance of SATA. If compatibility mode, the HARD drive would go at the speed of the IDE.
  I think your problem is perhaps related to the problem drive HARD and not Intel problem.

• Please do you intend to produce T series laptop with 15.6 display based on Sandy Bridge?

  Please tell me you intend to produce T series laptop with screen 15.6 inches based on Sandy Bridge processors? Please write soon. I await your response. Thanks in advance, you

  If you scroll down a little ways on www.Thinkpads.com, they say that the T420/T520 will be introduced in February.

• Where to find a list of processors that are fully supported for my laptop?

  I need to find a list of processors that are fully supported for my laptop, my laptop is a HP PAVILLION DV7 3090EO, im trying to change my processor for a new and need to know what processor taking care of my laptop.

  Thank you

  Dalatoni

  Hi Dalatoni,

  Looking at the Page 84 of your Service and maintenance Guide, there are only 2 processors compatible with your laptops card motherboard/Bios.

  Kind regards

  DP - K

• Fix for nasty bug of Sandy Bridge badly on USB devices

  Anyone know if there is a fix yet, some USB devices fail intermittently on a new MB with Windows 7 64 - bit edition.

  It is a quad core running the Sandy Bridge chipset, and vodafone dongles does work, even if they did on W7 64 bit on the former Council.

  Fault too:-some external hard drives are not recognized on any port.

  Your hard drives are connected via SATA?

  There is a known issue with some Sandy Bridge chipsets, where ports SATA fail, don't know if it affects USB ports or not.

  Intel issued a notice of recall for this with the affected chipsets - did you check the Intel website to see if you are one of those affected

• RHEL 7 will never be a platform support for vSphere SDK for Perl 5.5?

  RHEL 7 will never be a platform support for vSphere SDK for Perl 5.5?

  https://www.VMware.com/support/developer/viperltoolkit/viperl55/vsp55_vsperl_relnotes.html#supported

  
  

  Thank you
  

  We have recently updated the Perl SDK to 6.0 U2 which now supports RHEL 7.1, as seen in the vSphere SDK for Perl Release Notes

• Support for Nikon NEF D810 in Photoshop/Bridge CS6?

  I don't think that the NIkon NEF raw format has changed over the past years, but I have to ask: is there support for the D810 in CS6 NEF files, or I have to go to CC or something like Lightroom?

  I intend to take pictures in the 14-bit uncompressed (not the lossless, but actual no hold NEF/RAW image format uses the D810 (even once, do not know if it is different from the previous models like the D700/D610/D800 that have been out for 3 years now.)

  Hi dawnequipment,

  Yes, you can update plugin Camera raw to 9.1.1 CS6 software, which supports your camera Nikon D810.

  Please use the below link for the same thing.

  Download link: plugin Raw camera setup

  Let us know if it helps.

  Kind regards

  ~ Mohit

• D7000 Support RAW for Photoshop / Bridge CS4

  Anyone know if there is direct support for RAW files for the new Nikon D7000 for Adobe Photoshop CS4?

  I know there are DNG converter, but she wondered if there were a more direct and easier solution.

  Thanks for your help.

  The D7000 requires at least version 6.3 ACR.  This means that the route DNG or update to CS5,

• Sandy Bridge for Ivy Bridge CPU upgrade in the W520

  Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge using the same socket. All tech sites say that we can do.

  What are the implications? With HD-4000 graphics I would now be able to drive 4 monitors? What other benefits are there? Energy consumption is slightly reduced, the speed is slightly increased.

  What are the limits of the chipset and BIOS implications?

  It's probably not about the money, but will it work?

  
  

• Omni 1020 120 pc: upgrade processor motherboard Sandy bridge

  Can I use Intel Core i3-3220 (3rd generation) Ivy Bridge 3.3 GHz LGA 1155 55W Intel HD Graphics 2500 for my Omni 1020 120 pc aio pc?

  Thank you for the information, @Nannigalaxy.

  The information I needed was the (in) at the end of the model.  Here are the processors that have been fully tested to work in your motherboard:

  TDP: up to 65W
  Socket type: LGA 1155
  Motherboard supports the following processor upgrades:
  Intel Pentium G4xx (Sandy Bridge) core
  Dual-core Intel Pentium G5xx (Sandy Bridge)
  Dual-core Intel Pentium G6xxT (Sandy Bridge)
  Dual-core Intel Pentium G6xx (Sandy Bridge)
  Dual-core Intel Pentium G8xx (Sandy Bridge)
  Intel Core i3-2xxx/T (Sandy Bridge) Dual Core
  Intel Core i3-2xxx (Sandy Bridge) Dual Core
  Intel Core i5-2xxx (Sandy Bridge) Quad Core
  Intel Core i7-2xxx (Sandy Bridge) Quad Core

  These are processors that we know won't work correctly.  If you use any processor not on the list, he has a good chance that it won't work.

  Please click on the button + Thumbs up if I helped you and click on accept as Solution If your problem is resolved.

• I5-650 upgrade to i7 - 875 or wait for Ivy Bridge-E to be released?

  Then, when I bought my current motherboard, my upgrade path has been my i5-650, which is quite slow, to an i7. I've been waiting for a while for the price to drop on the i7-875, but they remain still at the 350-$ 400 (US) level. I like the i7-875 because it has unlocked. I have a Noctura C12P cooler, I initially intended to buy a unlocked i7 and overclock a little. Unfortunately my i5-650 has no an unlocked multiplier. I knew that when I bought it, but at the point where I expected to be able to upgrade the processor in the year. I did not yet as I used to be an editor very novist - now I'm at an intermediate level and my slow processor has really started to bother me.

  However, now I think that it would be better to wait for the Ivy Bridge-E, which from what I've read so far, should be a processor 8-core complete. This will allow me to take advantage of the four memory channels (my i5 only supports dual channel), a better CPU socket as the 2011, much more big cache on die CPU itself and of course the 8 cores that will be 4 times the physical cores that I have now. I'll also be able to update my motherboard if I leave with a new processor, which would be nice because my EVGA P55 THE limit myself to only 16 GB of memory, 4 x 4 gigs. When I built my rig, two years ago, 16 concerts seemed to be quite similar. Now, I know that I need 32 or maybe 64, so I need a motherboard that offers 8 DIMM slots - mine has only four.

  I'll have to wait about a year or two, depending on when Intel finally released Ivy Bridge-E, but I'm OK with it if it means a significant improvement in my render times. Now that I'm loading individual clips with many effects, color correction, etc... I see a lot more red in my calendar and I'm tired of waiting for the previews made and so I can back to work.

  Any thoughts on the Ivy Bridge-E and its release date, etc...? All I can find is that it is delayed until the third quarter of 2013, which is nearly a year away, but if the new format of 22nm chip is worth the wait, I will be willing to wait rather than take an intermediate step and then spend again in less than a year...

  Thank you!

  The upgrade should be based on what makes more sense than your workloads. From this moment you can already buy a motherboard Socket 2011 as there dropping in support of 8-processor Core (they are already avaiblible under the line of Xeon from Intel that is supported on the boards as the WS P9X79 which work as well consumer CPUs (Sandy Bridge (E). The difficult situation you're is you pushcaeed a platform that had a quick u-turn socket wise so upgrade has become limited and the cost of the CPU for the platform.

  At least with the 2011 Socket which is not goin anywhere any time soon. Ultimately, you must make the call whether to move your Board and CPU currently to something that will provide a significant increase in performance as a X 79 part of card with even the quad core (3820) or wait to get a piece of 8 native hearts which is already avaiblible with references of Xeon. Do not forget that there is a cost of considerble delta by adopting a 8 on the side of Intel processor.

  I hope this helps. Enjoy the rest of your day!

• 15 - ba006nl and 15-ay008nl: ram taken Max supported for upgrade

  I would like to know the maximum ram supported for two laptop. On the HP page, it is not specified. They are the two 8 GB of ram (ddr3l for 15-ba006nl) and ddr4 for 15-ay008nl but the max ram supported for a future upgrade is not present. Maybe it is only 8 GB and can not be upgraded? Thank you.

  Hello:

  For the 15-ay008nl, Chapter 1, page 6 of the manual of the service provides information to upgrade memory.

  http://h10032.www1.HP.com/CTG/manual/c05087748

  Your laptop is a 6th gen core processor, so the max is 2 x 8 GB.

  For the 15-ba006nl, Chapter 1, pages 2 and 3 of the maintenance manual provides memory upgrade information.

  http://h10032.www1.HP.com/CTG/manual/c05227786

  Your laptop has an AMD A-8 processor, so the max is 2 x 8 GB.

• Satellite C870 - 1 H 2 and support for virtualization

  Hello

  I am (was to) buy a Toshiba Satellite C870 - 1 H 2 (from amazon.co.uk).
  The specifications look ideal for me, but at the last moment, I thought to check if VT - x extensions are supported.

  I know that the processor supports extensions (as detailed here: [http://ark.intel.com/products/71465/]), but I know also that the extensions are often not enabled (or there is no option in the BIOS to enable them).

  The expression "Virtualization Technology" (which is present on other pages of the specification) is clearly absent from the plug laptop here: [http://www.toshiba.co.uk/discontinued-products/satellite-c870-1h2/].
  I saw some comments that suggest the Satellite * Pro * series usually provides the support for virtualization, but it always seems to be missing on many current models of Pro's specifications.

  I don't know why the C870 would not support VT - x, when we know that his material, but the specifications indicate that this is the case. On the other hand, I found no references to people complaining about the lack of VT - x support.

  So my question is, the Satellite C870 - 1 H 2 actually does support VT - x, or not?
  (and if not, because it takes just a very small piece of code BIOS, why not?)

  Thank you

  > The same issue applies. These models are supported virtualization

  VT support is always depends on the CPU built in Notepad. But you mentioned it in the first post.
  According to the page of the Ark from Intel, the Intel Pentium 2020 M processor supports Intel Virtualization Technology (VT - x)