support of RAM speed

Similar Questions

• Is RAM speed issue?

  Introduction:

  Hello, I ran some tests today to see if RAM speed really makes a difference when it comes to After Effects. In short, my conclusion is that, no, it makes no difference. At least not for the type of project I tested it with. Here are my conclusions, but first of all, my system specs.

  System Specs:

  Intel Core i7 - 3930K (4.3 GHz OC) cooled water

  120 GB Sata II SSD for the OS and programs

  256 GB Sata III SSD for the files of project and after effects of Disk Cache

  16 GB (4x4Go) Corsair Vengeance RAM (hourly stock are 1600 MHz @ 8,8,8,24)

  1 GB Nvidia GTX 460 SE

  Test project:

  The project involved 6 AVCHD videos played simultaneously and a few very basic effects such as corner pinning and cc removal of thread. The after effects memory and multiprocessing settings were as follows. 5 GB reserved for other programs, 2 CPUs reserve for other programs, 2 GB by heart.

  Results:

  1333 MHz, 12, 12, 12, 24 @ 1.57V

  Render time: 03:22

  1333 MHz, 7, 7, 7-24 @ 1.6V

  Render time: 03:17

  1866 MHz 9, 9, 9, 24, @ 1.57V

  Make the timer 03:14

  1866 MHz, 12, 12, 12, 24 @ 1.57V

  Render time: 03:19

  2133, 12, 12, 12, 24 @ 1.6V

  Render time: 03:15

  Conclusion:

  So, in my tests, I found that RAM stpeed is not really play a big role in this situation. However, after thinking about this a bit, I realized that this is probably due to the fact that my RAM must load data from and data dump to my SSD in this project. Even if my SSD is able more 500 MB/s had R/W, it is still not even remotely near speed, were one of these RAM speeds.

  So my question to you all is then as follows, can you recommend a type of project with effects that will mainly use the RAM without having to access my SSD? While my tests show a good example of 'real world' of the effects of the speed of the RAM, they do not show the full picture. With your recommendations, I'll create a new project that will best contribute to the effects of the speed of the RAM and add these conclusions about it.

  Yes... just a little space to fit... you could literally get 8 + of my tricks inside of your and still have room.

  In any case, I did a few tests more and discovered more interesting things on the search for the best speed of RAM.

  Test project

  Just a rubix cube in rotation with 6 iterations of keylight to key of all colors. The AE memory and multiprocessing settings were as follows: 5 GB reserved for other programs, 2 CPUs for other programs, 2 GB by heart. See original post for the specifications of the system. NOTE: I increased the frequency breaks through a little following GHz 4,427 during this test.

  
  

  Results:

  NOTE: Purged of the means I have "purged all" immediately before you click the record button.
  

  24 999 1553 (32.839ns total latency)

  Purged of time 1: 03:37

  Time without purge 1: 03:15

  Time without purge 2: 03:22

  24 999 1864 (27.360ns total latency)

  Purged of time 1: 03:51

  Time without purge 1: 03:03

  Time without purge 2: 03:08

  Time served 2: 03:09

  22 999 1864 (26.287ns total latency)

  Purged of time 1: 03:41

  Time without purge 1: 03:08

  Time without purge 2: 03:07

  Time without purge 3: 02:48

  Time served 2: 03:12

  2174 12 12 12 24 (27.599ns total latency)

  Purged of time 1: 03:45

  Time without purge 1: 03:20

  Time without purge 2: 03:18

  Conclusion:

  These figures all seem to be pretty conclusive that the most important part for After Effects displays must have the total latency as low as possible. So if you're in the market for RAM, get some will give you the lowest total latency, even if it means the passage with the 1600 MHz RAM on the 2400 MHz RAM. The argument according to which the higher latency will consist in transfer rate does not appear to apply here. In fact, it makes sense because a single address in RAM should contain nearly 500 MB for just a difference of 8ns in total latency. (Actual capacity of a single address is probably considerably smaller than that. I sent an email to Corsair to know what the maximum capacity. I'll post here again if they ever come back to me). So in the example above, where cpachris can run either 1600 MHz to 24 777 or to 10,11,10,30 2133 MHz, it would be MUCH better off running at 1600 MHz.

  Other important details:

  Intel says that the speed of RAM they recommend is 1600 MHz (Haswell of 1866 MHz however). I think it's because the hearts intel (at least those I did research) have a clock (bclk) standard base of 100 MHz. everything is based on this bclk. Your CPU frequency is generated by multiplying the bclk by a number. So for 4.4 GHz would multiply you a bclk to 100 MHz by 44. Pretty simple. RAM has now (I think) a multiplier locked which has the value 8. 100 MHz x 8 = 800 MHz, multiplied by 2 for Double data rate (DDR), which means, gives you 1600 MHz. If you try to set your frequency high that WITHOUT changing the bclk then you RAM may very well be running at 1600 MHz, just with worst timings.

  Now, if you were to increase the bclk for 116.625 your RAM frequency would become 116.625 x 8 x 2 = 1866. The tests I ran support this. In the original post, I had my bclk of 100 MHz (RAM max of 1600 MHz frequency). This test showed that, if I went more than 1600 MHz there is no advantage. In the next round of tests, I tested only the values min and max for those who do not give a picture complete. In the last test I boosted my bclk to 116.5 who gave me a RAM of 116.5 x 8 x 2 = 1864 MHz frequency. It is at this frequency that I gave my best results. So, if you use valued at more than 1600 MHz of RAM I encourage you to try to increase your bclk to where it corresponds to the frequency of your RAM and then run tests to see if that makes a difference. I'll go back and try to run the same tests with 1600 MHz to see where that falls to help support or defeat my argument.

  If someone objects to my statements above, please comment and let me know why so we can understand this stuff. All my findings are based only on some readings I've done and what my test results show.

  EDIT:

  I just ran some tests more and got subsequent synchronizations during execution of 1600 MHz at the time 8,8,8,24.

  1st series of tests:

  1600-888-24 (latency total 30ns)

  Duration: 03:14

  2nd series of tests:

  1600-888-24 (latency total 30ns)

  Time:05:34

  The time difference between 1600 and 1866 enforcement was minimal. It was exactly the same time for the first test and the time of 1600 in 4 seconds slower than the calendar of 1866 came. Compare the differences to run the same tests AFTER increase the bclk and this discrepancy increases to 15 + seconds. (by only comparing tests performed to the highest cpu frequency because that plays a very important role in the performance).

• Impact of the RAM speeds on site/server

  Hi and welcome to the Finland!

  I am suppose to accuire new material and I don't know what is the most effective way to go.

  I have two options at hand: the R900 and Poweredge R710/R910.

  I just wonder, how much speed RAM (not the amount but the speed) affect a server that will host a website? The site/s is / are quite heavy and at least put a toll on the side of viewers of the performance, but since the R900 supports only 667 Mhz RAM, is really worth to at least double the budget and go for R710/910 supporting 1333 Mhz RAM?

  The speed of RAM affect a server that much?

  Overall the R900 would have a total of four 2, 94Ghz quad-cores and about 100 gigabytes of RAM, 15 k HARD drive of

  The R710/R910 would have about one-third less the CPU performance and about 50 gigs of RAM, you would be 1333 Mhz.

  Think you folks?

  This is an issue involving too variable. In the past, I've seen servers with slower speed ram perform easily out of servers with faster ram, in general, it is the reverse.

  «The R710/R910 would have about one-third less the CPU performance and about 50 gigs of RAM, you 1333 Mhz.»

  CPU speed trumps ram speed usually, especially 33% difference, even taking into account the web servers are mainly intensive reading.

  Not sure how much disk space you need, but if it's a reasonable amount I would look in SSDS for extreme drive speed. If no SSD, and if you have the resources, raid 10 is fast enough.

• Will be my Compaq 620 Support this RAM?

  Hi, I just bought a computer laptop HP Compaq 620 opportunity and I was wondering if it would support this ram.

  Ram Kingston card

  Thank you

  Greg

  * Hope this helps *.
  * Click on the laurels on the left if you think this helps *.
  Click on accept as solution if it solves your problem *.

  Hi, Greg:

  No, this memory will not work.

  It is desktop only.

  This is what you need:

  http://www.Newegg.com/product/product.aspx?item=N82E16820139481

  or this:

  http://www.Newegg.com/product/product.aspx?item=N82E16820231294

  Paul

• What is the difference between 32-bit & 64 bit outside support of RAM OS?

  What is the difference between 32-bit & 64 bit outside support of RAM OS?

  How he behaves all by interacting with applications, impact on performance etc.,.

  • http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-AU/Windows/32-bit-and-64-bit-Windows#1TC=Windows-7
  • http://www.techsupportalert.com/content/32-bit-and-64-bit-explained.htm 
    report on more Web site: https://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/techsupportalert.com

  Google is your friend.

• WIN8 32 bit supports 6giga ram and if the fact of support ram 8giga

  WIN8 32 bit supports 6giga ram and if the fact of support ram 8giga

  Window of 8 and all Windows 32-bit operating systems only supports 4 GB of RAM and a 32-bit operating
  system can only access about 3.25 GB to 4 GB.
  .

• How to get the maximum supported ram speed

  Hi, I HAVE a laptop COMPAQ PRESARIO CQ 60 132 - el and I want to upgrade the RAM. I have now that support max 8 GB, but I want now, which is the maximum speed of the ram supported by Mhz, in fact I have 3 GB ddr 2 sodimm 4

  programmatically Z CPU at 400 mhz.   Please help me! I am grateful for!

  Plug

  You have 32 bit Vista OS (can support max ~ 4GB RAM)

  Your computer laptop support up to 4 GB of RAM MAX - so even if you install OS 64-bit, your motherboard only supports up to 4 GB in the first place.

  You can replace a 1 GB of RAM from the slot with 2 GB PC2-6400 DDR2 667 MHz SO-DIMM SDRAM, but the cost of RAM will be huge compared to the performance & capacity that he proposed as these types of RAM (DDR, DDR2) are not used in recent laptops & they are 'very precious' for - $ 100 for a key 2 GB DDR2.

  Go through page 1-3, 3-6, 4-13, 14 in this manual.

  Concerning

  Visruth

• C50-B-13N satellite will not support the RAM recommended

  Hi guys, I have a new Satellite C50 8.1 Win.

  On the Toshiba site, for this particular model, it can be upgraded to 8 GB of ram.
  There is no easy access on the background of this laptop Panel, so the complete lower cover must be removed, and there is only 1 RAM slot.

  So I bought a single stick of ram 8 GB DDR3 at 1333 MHz (recommended speed on http://www.toshiba.co.uk/laptops/satellite/c50-b/satellite-c50-b-13n/ site Tosh).
  Problem is he can't ram 1333 MHz speed - NOT just because it was an 8GB stick (I also had 1, 2 and 4 GB available sticks to test).

  On cuts size of 1333 MHz laptop tries to power on then feeds directly to the output.
  Its not too fast - for one, it's a portable Gen current with a processor that will gladly help 1333 MHz, but - GET THIS - the ram that came out was a stick of 4 GB 1600 MHz.

  To try to contact Toshiba support I gave by telephone of the sales representative who had no idea what I was feeling and finally told Topaz ring, Toshiba repair and warranty the guys, who were quite confused as to why I was told to ring the.

  So what about £55 in the sewers, because the package is opened and Toshiba play dumb on a possible serious failure.

  If anyone has any ideas or suggestions, they would be much appreciated.

  Thanks in advance
  Simon@Brokenbox

  Well, the processor Intel® Celeron® N2830 supports modules DDR3L-1333.
  Here is the page of Intel Ark
  http://Ark.Intel.com/products/81071/

  That is why the seepage of support max is 1333 Mhz even if you use faster modules

• G7-2235dx: Ram speed

  Hello guys,.
  I wonder if I can use the speed of the ram of 1,600 MHz with this laptop or need 1330 MHz?

  Thank you

  TecknoFreak

  Hello;

  Let me welcome you on the HP forums!

  I read your post on memory speeds with yout laptop and wanted to help.

  Your maintenance and repair said the laptop comes with a memory DDR3 - 1600 MHZ, so you should be able to run at this speed.

  To check what you have, my suggestion is that you download and run CPU - z: http://www.cpuid.com/

  This will tell you how fast coasts that your memory sticks currently support.

  Good luck
  ========================================================================
  I'm a volunteer and I do not work for, or represent, HP.
  ---------------------------------------------------------------
  If my post helped you, please click on the thumbs-up symbol to say thank you.
  If my posts resolved your issue please click "accept as a Solution.
  ========================================================================

• Alienware M14x R2 Ram speed

  Would it not possible to change the BIOS to allow faster than 1600 mhz ram installation? If so, how would I go all this on my laptop of special running Windows x 64 Pro 10? Thanks to everyone for their help!

  Hello

  The highest speed of ram that can support the Alienware M14X R2 is 1600 MHz. We do not recommend set the Bios to operate with greater speed of the ram, which would likely cause the system to crash.

• CQ61-319WM and AC twin memory RAM speed

  I bought the CQ61-319WM with / 3 GB or RAM.  The provided configuration is a badly matched set of a 1 GB SODIMM (A-Data) and a 2 GB SODIMM (Samsung).  According to CPU - Z 1.54, both pieces is 400 MHz (DDR2 - 800 MHz), latency CASE 6-6-6-18-24 and according to Memtest86 + 4.00, the result is speed of the RAM of 3481 MB/s using 64-bit transfers (single channel access).

  Upgrading to a configuration usually total memory dual channel results in a good Speed up, I decided to replace the 1 GB SODIMM with another 2 GB.

  I had a piece of 2 GB to another previous project, but it was a version special high speed with latency CASE of 5-5-5-18-23.  I decided that a pair of them so completely taken over would be the best that I could reach, so I bought a second piece (about 80 $ CAN) and put them in.  I've also upgraded the BIOS F.13 (and my Memtest86 + 4.10).

  The result is better, but not as good as it could be.  Reports of CPU - Z full CASE 5-5-5-18 is used and I think it's saying that the dual channel is active (or he's saying that the RAM can support double channel - I am not sure).

  Memtest 86 + (4.00 and 4.10 versions) indicate that the CASE has indeed changed to 5-5-5-18, but that access is still 64-bit (single channel) and the speed of RAM increased to 3614 MB/s.

  3614 MB/s is faster than 3481 MB/s, it is not as fast as I expect 5-5-5-18-23 memory to be if it is currently running dual channel (128-bit access).

  I believe that the BIOS has probably decided to stay "single channel" because the RAM is in a configuration that was unexpected (because the latency CASE is too fast).  However, this probably means that if I buy another piece of 'standard' 800 MHz DDR2 (CASE 6-6-6-18-24) and install it with the original Samsung RAM, it will probably run at full dual channel (128-bit).  Such a configuration should be faster than what I'm running now, despite the fact that the RAM by piece real speed is slower.

  Anyone used this RAM (2 x (2 GB, 800 MHz, CL6)) the installation program?  Can anyone confirm that the result is a configuration complete dual channel?  I can buy the RAM, but if she does not run dual channel, so it's just a waste of money.

  Note: It would certainly NOT let fall to the bottom as for two-channel to 667 MHz.  Such a decline would result in approximately 2600 MB/s even double channel speeds up access.

  I heard generally good.  Curiosity prevailed, and I bought one more piece of RAM.  This piece has been another 2 GB DDR2 800 MHz SODIMM, but this time with the same latency than the original equipment numbers (CASE 6-6-6-18-24).  I installed it with the original Samsung CQ61-319WM and speed of memory that result was exactly the same as the pair (CASE 5-5-5-18-23) faster RAM.  The computer has finished 3-pass of Memtest86 + 4.10 as the fastest pair of RAM, confirming also the speed.

  This tells me that the speed increase had nothing to do with issues of latency, and she had to come from the increase in speed of access memory (128-bit) 'Dual Channel '.

  As to why Memtest86 + 4.10 is reported as "single channel", I feel that the answer may have to do with the RAM 'Side Port' CQ61 graphics system.  According to published specifications, this computer has 128 MB GDDR2 (and memory).  It does not say how this memory is configured.  If it is the only channel (128-bit), then it could be that Memtest86 + sees.

  To confirm this, I took the pair of quick latency RAM and put it in another computer that uses an older AMD 690 chipsets, and the same pair of RAM ran in dual channel mode on the other computer, but at a lower speed of 667 MHz.  Therefore, it seems that AMD memory controllers have probably no problem with this pair of RAM running in dual channel in general.

  While nothing that I've done is quite conclusive, indicates that this computer was probably working with access memory dual channel for two configurations of 4 GB RAM I used.

  In any case, I'll leave the slower RAM in the computer because whenever I change my configuration of memory, I have to lose more than 3 hours running Memtest86 + to check it's OK.  If I did not need to get an acceleration, I will use the faster RAM later in something else.

  There might be a reason to use the best of the RAM (which is probably more recent technology and probably using a little less power), but I don't want to spend more time on this issue.

• Miscrosoft Word on Mac - it's never works well, with complex documents? If so, optimal CPU, RAM speed, etc. ?

  I've been using Microsoft Word for Mac (2011) for a while (on a Macbook Pro, 2010, OSX 10.11.5) and sometimes encounter problems with this gel, especially when doing a wide track changes on a document. I don't know if this has to do with the limitations inherent in Word (I talked to PC users who have exactly the same problem with Word), my computer is not enough of fantasy to run this software at a reasonable speed (speed of the CPU? RAM?), or that my computer's hard drive is toast (recent diagnosis of a 'genius' of Apple). Or maybe all three.

  Whatever it is, I need a new computer, and one that will be able to manage the work on complex Word documents (sometimes more than one at a time) using full tracking capabilities - the software changes, without crashing or slowing down to the speed of the turtle. My questions:

  1. does MS Word work inherently less well on Mac than on PC, esp. When you make the stuff of fantasy as heavy track changes? (I wouldn't go PC, but as a professional editor, I have to put the right word running as my number one priority)

  2 if there is hope for Word on Mac, what are the optimal system specifications? Microsoft said minimum RAM for Word for Mac 2016 is 4 GB. If that's the minimum, should I get more than that? 6, 8, etc. ? Furthermore, what about the speed and type of processor? (Assuming that the computer is used mainly for daily use of work: simultaneous web browsing, e-mail, editing a Word document or both.) No game, video or streaming music)

  For example, it would be crazy to expect MS Word for Mac to run smoothly on a Macbook Air with these specs:

  Processor: 1.6 GHz dual-core Intel Core i5 (Turbo Boost up to 2.7 GHz) with 3 MB cache shared N3

  Memory: 4 GB on-board memory 1600 MHz LPDDR3

  Storage: 256 GB of flash PCIe storage

  General impressions nor special knowledge, you can share would be much appreciated!

  I have Office 2016 for Mac on my MacBook Air - but I do not have something complex. However, I would say that you can post the same question on the Microsoft Office for Mac forum: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/mac/forum/macoffice2016?auth=1

• Desktop PC HP Pavilion p7-1414: Ram speed question

  I just got 16 GB of Corsair Dominator 1866 Mhz ram. The computer is automatically set to 1333 Mhz speed. I went into the BIOS [I think it was the Bios] and there is no option to change the speed of the Ram.

  Because the BIOS firmware is done to promote stability and security, I don't know if the update can do RAM reached 1600 MHz

• Tecra Z40-A-176 - how to get support for high speed Port Replicator III?

  Hello

  a customer garage bougt some Tecra Z40 A 176 with high speed Port Replicator III. Unfortunally to either the displayport Port replicators is not working properly and I want to have the support so.

  What I found was the support for laptops page itself, but not for the port replicator.

  With regard to:
  Klaus

  I want to have the support so.

  What do you mean by support and what is the problem with the display port?

  If you have hardware problems, you can contact your dealer or contact the Toshiba authorized service provider that is available in your country.

• Support of RAM...

  Hi everyone, I have a vaio E series Vpcea 16 FG similar to 21/22fx series. I plan to upgrade its 16 GB ram. Before that, I would like to know if my phone is supported or not. Updating there will be changes in the performance of the laptop. Please let me know... < br > < br > thank you all. < br > Joey

  baudson,

  According to the specification, the RAM on a VPCEA16FG Max is 8 GB.