Table 1 d in a 2D array

Similar Questions

• Table 2D cluster table how insert table 2d of strings in an array of cluster?

  I have a cluster with 4 channel 3 elements of the string constants and 1 is a list box drop-down chain.

  I can save the Bay of cluster to deposit without any problem.

  Now, I want to read the file is saved in the Bay of cluster.

  How can I insert a table 2d of strings into an array of cluster?

  rcard53762 wrote:

  I have a cluster with 4 channel 3 elements of the string constants and 1 is a list box drop-down chain.

  I can save the Bay of cluster to deposit without any problem.

  Now, I want to read the file is saved in the Bay of cluster.

  How can I insert a table 2d of strings into an array of cluster?

  It would be useful to have an example of what real cluster Bay look like the typical data. One way to do is by saving the content of the table cluster in a configuration file (.ini extension) and then use the OpenG screws of the Variant Configuration file to store and retrieve data from the configuration file. You can get these screws in the VI package manager.

  Here is an example. The generated configuration file is also attached.

  

  Ben64

• Combine two tables 1 d in a 2D array

  Hi all

  Maybe I forget what is obvious, but I can't find a solution to combine two tables 1 d in a 2D array AND (it is the impossible part for me) using the tables columns instead of lines.

  Example:

  Table 1:1, 2, 3, 4

  Table 2:5, 6, 7, 8

  Result: 1, 5

  2, 6

  3, 7

  4, 8

  The 'build array' function seems to add all tables as lines... I guess I could transpose the table, but I want it runs in a Subvi in constructions of different loop and I feel a little uncomfortable with it - I guess one would be left with a completely mixed table. I was maybe blind just to find the right function?

  Cheers, Jessi

  Hi Jessi,

  by default, LV is combining tables in rows. So when you need columns you must transpose the sets or use a different indexing scheme...

• Create table 2d by pulling larger 2d table columns, as indivated by an array of Boolean

  Hello

  I have a 2d chart with 16 columns that contain data from different input channels.  I also have a 1 d array of Boolean (length 16) corresponding to these columns.  In the table of Boolean 1 d, if a value is true, I want this column in table 2d to stay.  If the value in the table of Boolean 1 d is wrong, I want to delete the corresponding column.

  Thus, for example, if the table of Boolean 1 d looks like this:

  [T T T T F F T T T F T T F F T F]

  the new 2d array would be 10 columns, which correspond to the columns of the old 16-column of table 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12 and 15.

  I am very new to labview (programming just started yesterday). Can someone help a newbie to do something that is probably simple? In my view, that there will be an iteration back through the deletion of rows and 16 columns table columns as they come if the value of the Boolean vector is false, or iterate forward through the 16 columns and add columns to a table if the value of the Boolean vector is true... but I don't know how to do this.

  Thank you

  Matt

  If you have 2012 you could just do this:

  

  -Ryan S.

• 3D table organization fomr a 1 d array in a for loop

  Hello-

  I am currently using a program OR opening multiple files (http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/epd/p/id/818). As a side note, I noticed that the files are automatically organized by name once records are returned from the Subvi. Will be called BxCy where x is a number and y is a number to two digits (e.g., B2C34) and within each file, I load a 1 d table which I extracted the files, I am loading.

  I want to do is organize the output so it has the structure of

  Page C1

  Line B1 [(table 1 d)]

  Line B2 [(table 1 d)]

  ...

  Line Bn [(table 1 d)]

  Page C2

  Line B1 [(table 1 d)]

  Line B2 [(table 1 d)]

  ...

  Line Bn [(table 1 d)]

  and so on.

  My first question is that I'm not 100% sure that the file names will be organised by name in the lu multi-fichier VI so is there someone who can check it out? Second, even with what I would like to know if there are effective methods to achieve this. Should I just use two tables index to classify based on their number of anc C B? This seems to slow down and I saw on other positions the function array reshape could speed up the process but I'm not sure how to proceed. I don't have access to the structures of inplace (I don't know if I just forgot to install this module, or if it was not included in my subscription LabVIEW).

  The program that I joined is in LabVIEW 2009 SP1 and I'm on a Windows 7 64-bit machine.

  Thank you in advance!

  J

  • You did not include the subVIs. Please do.
  • Never convert a path to a string, unless you do something specific OS. Use 'strip path' work on the name of the file as strings, then convert back to a path using "build path" if necessary.
  • To create a 3D tables 1 d array, you need two stacked FOR loops. Pages in the loop external and rows in the inner loop and outoindex in the output in loop tunnels. You will automatically get a 3D Board.
  • It might be much easier to use the "list of files" with a motif of "B * C *" for example. Is the number of the page always 1 and the numbers of two line numbers (padded with a zero not significant as appropriate)? In this case the sorting will be correct.

• .click on line works with php table - does not work with javascript array.

  Howdy,

  I met a very interesting problem today, and I hope that you will be able to help me.

  I have a page in which the upper part is php to read a table from the server and display the table, that the html page is under construction.

  Find data in a table, and each row is clickable, which click on move the user to another page, that is based on the selected line.

  Here are the relevant parts of the php code:

  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  <? PHP

  echo "< id of the table = 'patienttable" cellpadding = 5px border = 0-size of police = 16px > ';

  echo "< tr > < th ="30"width >". "ID #". ". "" < /th > < th = "100" width >. "Family name". " "" < /th > < th = "100" width >. "" Name"". "< /th > < th ="100"width" > "."

  "Middle name". "" < /th > < th = "80" width >. "" DOB ". "" < /th > < th = '50' width >. """" Zip"." < /th > < th = '50' width >". "' Gender '. "" < /th > < th = "100" width >.

  'Phone '. "< /th > < /tr >";

  While ($row = mysqli_fetch_array ($result))

  {

  blah blah blah

  echo "< tr > < td = 'localid' id >". " $localid. "< table > < td >. $lastname. "< table > < td >. $firstname. "< table > < td >. $middlename. "< table > < td >". " $dob. "< table > < td >". " $physzip. "< table > < td >. $gender. "< table > < td >". " $phone1.       "< table > < /tr >";

  }

  echo "< / table >";

  ? >

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------

  And here is the code to a click on a line:

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  $("#patienttable_tr").click (function () {}

  var passthis = $(this).find("#localid").html ();

  .post $("php/setsessionvariable.php",)

  {sessionval: passthis},.

  function {window.location.href = "root.php"}

  );

  });

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -----------------

  EVERYTHING works fine - no problem - works now for about 2 months.

  Today, I started to build something similar, BUT! I can't read the data base at the top of the page, I have to do an ajax request, call the db and display the data in a table;

  This is annoying, fairly simple javascript code:

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------

  $.ajax({)

  type: 'POST',

  URL: "findpatientbackend.php",

  data: {letterslastname: lastname},.

  data type: 'json ',.

  success: {function (result)}

  $("#div1").html("");

  If (result.length > = 1).

  {var output = "";}

  $("div1").html ("< id of the table =" findtable">" ");

  $(résultat, fonction (index, value) {} .each)

  output += '< tr > < td width = "100px" > < table > < id td 'localid' width = '100px' = > '.

  + value.localid + '< table > < td width = "100px" > ".

  + value.lastname + '< table > < td width = "100px" > ".

  + value.firstname + '< table > < td width = "100px" > ".

  + value.middlename + '< table > < td width = "100px" > ".

  + value.dob + '< table > < /tr > ";

  });

  $("#div1").html (output);

  $("div1").html ("< /table >");

  }

  },

  error: function() {alert ("error on the return") ;}}

  });

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -----------

  And here's the code click on lines, almost IDENTICAL to the above:

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -----------

  $("#findtable_tr").click (function () {}

  var passthis = $(this).find("#localid").html ();

  .post $("php/setsessionvariable.php",)

  {sessionval: passthis},.

  function {window.location.href = '... / root.php'}

  );

  });

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------

  All of the "stuff" loading on the page very well, BUT it absolutely nothing happens when I click on a line.

  Playing around this afternoon, I did a "View Source" on the two pages and saw something VERY interesting;

  1. the table written in PHP is present, can be seen and thus is "clickable".click on jquery function.

  2 - the table is written in javascript is INVISIBLE! I do not see in the source view (but I can see it on the screen) and as a result .click function on he can't see either.

  Issues related to the:

  1. How can I make the table written in javascript 'clickable' - how can I do the 'visible javascript array '?

  2 would it be the use of '.html' show table to the div? Is there another way?

  And again, I thank you in advance for any help.

  Sounds like a question of 'timing', i.e. you bind the click event tothe elements that don't exist - they do not exist because the AJAX call is not yet complete.

  You can use jQuery . on() (previously . live()) method to bind events to the elements 'the future '.

  Another option is to bind the click after the AJAX event is done and the

  is drawn.

  I guess even one other option is to ask the JSON in PHP so that the

  is called before the page is delivered.

  Moreover, we see items created by JavaScript using 'View Source '. Use Firebug or Chrome/Safari "inspect element".

  --

  Kenneth Kawamoto

  http://www.materiaprima.co.UK/

• Table row of string to string array column

  Perhaps, it's getting late... However, I can't figure out how to convert my string column to a line string.  That said, I read the other articles and none of them are solutions to my problem.  Please see the jpg files to see what I mean.

  So on the front panel, I have a "row" chain control  However, when I save on my .dot (word template) file, it spits out a column of data.  Because this column contains my column headers, I need them to display as a line.  Someone has suggestions on how to "force" it to show in the model as a line instead of a column?

  Never mind the help.  I found a solution to the problem.

  While everyone knows... If you want to change the deminsions of a string array simply use the function "reshape array" in the tool range.  Deminsion size is the number of lines and the bottom is the number of columns.  Just wire to the top and go!

  -------------- to

  -

  -

  -

  -

  -

  -

  -

  and vice versa.

  David

• How can I convert table 1 d in a 2D array.

  I have a table 1 d I want to get into an Excel template.  How can I convert a 2D table so I can enter Excel Table.vi easy?

  Be sure to check the correct operation. Solution-Marc adds another row of zeros and I don't know if this is desirable here. (See also)

• The search in a table a value then delete this array element

  Hello.

  I have an array of VO (id, link, title, url...) I want to get an ID of this array element and remove the element with the corresponding id. Any thoughts on how I would go to this topic?

  Thanks in advance!

  Ryan

  I don't know much on your and this probably isn't the most elegant solution, but you can do something like:

  for (var i: Number = 0; i<>

  {

  If (myVOArray [i] ["id"] is "someId")

  {

  myVOArray.splice (i, 1);

  }

  }

• Can I convert a table to a partion in an array of partitoned quickly?

  Hello
  
  We have 2 tables, one is the transactions table, and the other is table to archive transaction.
  Both have the same columns and indexes, but transaction archive table is a partition table stood by transaction date.
  
  Each week, we need to move the data from the transactions table to archive the table, and he needs about 2 hours.
  (add the partition, then insert into the partition by select * transaction)
  
  Oracle has the function to convert a table to a partition to a partition table?
  (just like the opposite direction of the EXCHANGE PARTITION)
  
  Thank you
  
  ARO
  Patrick

  Oracle has the function to convert a table to a partition to a partition table?

  It seems that you want to move ALL the rows in the transaction table in the table to archive.

  Why not do
  a. Add an empty Partition
  b. remove unnecessary indexes on table txn (index who are not in the table to archive)
  c. Swap Partition: ALTER TABLE EXCHANGE PARTITION WITH TABLE newpartition archivetable txntable;
  d. create a new txntable that is empty
  e. create indexes if necessary

  PS: If really do you move all the lines from the operating table to the table to archive, it would be the REMOVAL of the operating table that would take the most time, undo and redo.

  Hemant K Collette

  Published by: Hemant K grapple on June 1st, 2010 16:34

• join an associative array with table

  I'm new to associative arrays.
  
  Here, I'm doing the equivalent of as follows:
  

   create table mytable as select n1,padding from T1 where rownum <=5;
  Table created.

  And join this table with T1 and the corresponding records to get top 10

    1   SELECT * FROM
    2   (
    3     SELECT
    4              T1.n1
    5            , T1.small_vc
    6            , mytable.padding
    7      FROM
    8             mytable
    9            , T1
   10      WHERE
   11            mytable.n1 = T1.n1
   12   )
   13* WHERE ROWNUM <= 10;

  Now with the assicative bays

    1  DECLARE
    2          type array is table of T1%rowtype index by binary_integer;
    3          l_data array;
    4          l_rec T1%rowtype;
    5  BEGIN
    6          SELECT
    7                    *
    8          BULK COLLECT INTO
    9          l_data
   10          FROM T1
   11          WHERE ROWNUM <=5;   -- the top 5 records
   12          FOR i IN 1..l_data.count
   13          LOOP
   14                BEGIN
   15  --
   16               SELECT
   17                     *
   18               INTO
   19                     l_rec
   20               FROM
   21                     T1
   22               WHERE
   23                     T1.n1 = l_data(i).n1;
   24             EXCEPTION
   25               WHEN OTHERS THEN
   26                       DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE(to_char(SQLCODE) || ' - ' || substr(SQLERRM,1,200));
   27        END;
   28     END LOOP;
   29* END;
  [email protected]> /
  -1422 - ORA-01422: exact fetch returns more than requested number of rows
  -1422 - ORA-01422: exact fetch returns more than requested number of rows
  -1422 - ORA-01422: exact fetch returns more than requested number of rows
  -1422 - ORA-01422: exact fetch returns more than requested number of rows
  -1422 - ORA-01422: exact fetch returns more than requested number of rows

  Of course the encoding isn't fair. Also, I want to display the first 10 results set.
  
  Thank you
  
  Mich

  Talebzadeh mich wrote:

  Does it fast enough and I think it is necessary for using the pipeline to multiple joins functions to update the tables of FACTS so to speak.

  A pipeline returns data that are not indexed. So by default, using data from a pipeline function involves a full production table scan. That's why native SQL tables are better than a pipeline - as these are accessible and used optimally (via the index partitions, bitmaps, clusters, etc.).

  Since PTFS uses memory structures as associative arrays do, what are the main benefits of using TFP compared to the associative arrays in addition to the fact that in MFP memory structures are presented in the SQL format?

  Not the same structure. An associative array is typically a list linked and "indexed" differently.

  A normal array is accessible by compensation. Let's say it's an array of bytes 4 IEEE floats. 1st entry is at position 0 in the structure of memory. The 2nd entry at position 4. Etc.

  Index number of the table is used to determine the offset of this table cell in the structure of memory.

  An associative array is "indexed" using strings or dates or numbers (not sequential). Thus a structure like a linked list must be used. Access to the range means a search in this linked to the match index list and then read the value of this cell in the table.

  The associative arrays do exist in the SQL engine. It is a unique data structure of PL/SQL engine.

  As to the benefits of a pipeline - this is when the data must be processed and plain vanilla SQL is not able to do this and PL/SQL is required.

  Simple example. A flat web service XML data structure. A table of pipeline can use UTL_HTTP to make the service web call, retrieve the XML code and that the output data as rows and columns - in effect turning a web service interface into something that looks like a SQL table and can be used as if it were a table SQL.

  Reading Tom on the use of pipelines comments:
  http://asktom.Oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:2814739467100916:P11_QUESTION_ID:19481671347143

  Also when can I use associative arrays functions insteard table in pipeline?

  Associative arrays are useful for the only PL/SQL data. For example, which deals with the pair name / value that are placed by a customer and that are used to determine which query or process data. For the majority of the PL/SQL code and the treatment, associative arrays are not necessary. And often wrongly used that developers do not seem to understand what an associative array is and how it differs from a normal table structure.

• Automate the cells of the filter to another table based on two columns

  Hello

  What I'm trying to do is: filter multiple cells to a new table. In this example, I want that all students (column 'lidnr', 'city', then the first 7 columns) with 1 teacher in the 'First' column to be copied into the table 'teacher 1'. The same goes for students per 1 teacher in the column "second". I know it can be done with the help of the filter and the copy paste, but I would like to know if this can be automated, because there are many more tables in my actual document.

  

  

  I've been using maybe to think the search formula but he can't give me more than one result, the result must be unique.

  Thank you very much for your help.

  Kind regards

  Kim

  Hi Kim,

  The usual way to do this is to add an index for each table for which column the data is to be copied.

  Here is an example of preliminary. Improvements after return from the light of day.

  

  Triangles of error on the last row of T1 are thanks to the formula out of data to search for. Easily fixed.

  Order of the names is different from your example, which is grouped by day numbers. Build lists in the desired order, rethinking the index calculations.

  Course index calculations use the formula below, entered in Table 1::L2 and thre to the rest of the blue full cells filled.

  L2: = IF (OR (RIGHT($H2,1) = RIGHT (L$ 1.1) RIGHT($J2,1) = RIGHT (L$ 1.1)), MAX(L$1:L1) + 1"," ")

  Data recovery on the Table T1 is well done by the following formula, entered in A2 and down and B2 and filled and down-filled.

  A2: = INDEX (array 1::A, CORRESPONDENCE (LINE (−1, 1 Table): $L, 0))

  B2: = INDEX (array 1::B, CORRESPONDENCE (LINE (−1, 1 Table): $L, 0))

  More tomorrow (actually, later today).

• How to create a second table containing the first?

  I have a table with data source. I would like to create a second table that feeds these data. I will use the second table for the filtered views, etc. I am currently copying a range of cells through, referring to table 1. However, if a new line is added to table 1, it does not table 2. How can I configure things so that any changes - including the new lines/columns would be automatically carried over to table 2?

  Table 2 cannot automatically grow the new rows or columns. If you want it to be completely 'automatic', your second table must be as large or larger than your first picture will be never. In other words, there need to additional rows and columns to allow growth. If is not bigger than 1 table, when you add rows or columns to the table 1, you must also manually add rows or columns to the table 2.  The problem is that all these lines/additional columns in table 2 will have formulas that are referred to non-existent rows/columns in table 1, which is a mistake. What you do next depends on what you do with table 2. If it is just for display of data and your existing formulas are all as = 1::A1 Table, you can change to = SIERREUR (array 1::A1, "") to get rid of the errors.  To hide all blank lines, you can set up a filter to show only the rows where column A is not a space (for example) character. There is no filter to hide additional columns, however.

• to convert decimal table table of Boolean

  Hey all

  I have a decimal table (or at least that's what I think it is).

  the table is 1010 (and the number of bits can change depending on the application)

  that 1010 is decimal. I want to convert that into a Boolean 1010, because I have to open close some ports in this logic.

  Help, please

  Thank you very much

  Well done more to give

  Your information is a little sparse, so I fill in some blanks by guessing...

  1010 is not a table (and no Boolean value either!)

  Is each figure part of the picture? What is the representation?

  If each digit is a digital element of the array, just wire 'not equal zero' to the table and you will get an array of Boolean.

  It might be easier if you can fix a simple VI which contains the table that you have and the table you want. Thank you!

• Table 2D to 1 d waveform

  With the help of this function I can take a 2d data table and turns them into an array of 1 d waveform.

  If a table of 7 x 100 would give me 7 waveforms with 100 values of y in each.

  The dt would be the same and the departure time would be the same.

  For some reason when I use the waveform graph it is traced 7 waveforms, but charted only 7 points for each.  It must be drawn however many values there is in each waveform in my example 100.

  Without any data stored in your VI, I can't say how your array is configured.  You use a table of index in parallel on each line.  Maybe you should be indexing on each column.

  In addition, your code could be done easily by using a loop For auto-index using the waveform and table 2-D.  The only thing you need to do is to use transpose the table before the loop For the index on the correct size (columns or rows).