Table of boolean to Boolean unique

Similar Questions

• How to convert the string with numbers in the table of Boolean 2D

  Hello

  I have input a string with comma separated numbers 1,192 (starting at 1).

  This string must be converted to a table 2D-boolean. Each number that appears should be true, not true rest.

  The 2D table consists of 4 times of 0.47 Boolean values.

  1.48--> [0.47] numbers [0]
  49.96--> [0.47] numbers [1]
  Numbers 97.144--> [0.47] [2]
  145.192--> [0.47] numbers [3]

  If a '1, 49, 97 145' input string put all [0] [0.3] true.

  How can it be easy/fast resolved?

  Thanks for help

  Break the string of numbers in a table of numbers.  (Spreasheet String to Array).

  In a loop For, index with each issue of this table.  Use in the range and Coerce to see if it is in the range of numbers.  (You can put this in a loop For as auto good indexing through the ranges).  If it's in the range, then use subset replace table to activate the corresponding item in a real.  If this is not the case, do nothing.  Maintain the table of Boolean in a shift register.

  Repeat this step for each number in your table.

  (What is a class assignment?)

• Number of 1s or 0s in a table of Boolean

  How to find the number of 1s or 0s to an array of Boolean. for example in 101011, ago four 1s and 0 two s.

  Hello

  Thanks to you all.

  I just got an idea and his work. It's better, I want to share with you.

  1. Convert the table of Boolean 0, 1 (available in boolean labiew)
  2. Just to summarize these 0, 1, using arithmetic sum
  3. Comapre the sum with half of the number of channels.
  4. If the sum is greater than or equal to, its ok

  Thank you.

• How can single checkbox can be selected in the table with Boolean checkboxes?

  I have a table editable ADF where an attribute is a Boolean checkbox... and stores the value with Y or N.
  
  Is there a way where the single checkbox must be selected at time of posting?
  
  For example, in the case its a table of responses to a choice unique to an application of Questionnaire, Question by adding new responses to the table..., the user inserts 3 rows (answers)... then the Boolean checkbox for only one of these 3 rows can be verified.
  
  Thank you
  DJ

  Since you have an attribute that has the "Y" or "n" for each line.
  When the user selects a line, you must deselect the other lines using the value change listener pro-grammatically.
  If the number of rows is large, it could be performance intensive.

  Thank you
  Nini

• to convert decimal table table of Boolean

  Hey all

  I have a decimal table (or at least that's what I think it is).

  the table is 1010 (and the number of bits can change depending on the application)

  that 1010 is decimal. I want to convert that into a Boolean 1010, because I have to open close some ports in this logic.

  Help, please

  Thank you very much

  Well done more to give

  Your information is a little sparse, so I fill in some blanks by guessing...

  1010 is not a table (and no Boolean value either!)

  Is each figure part of the picture? What is the representation?

  If each digit is a digital element of the array, just wire 'not equal zero' to the table and you will get an array of Boolean.

  It might be easier if you can fix a simple VI which contains the table that you have and the table you want. Thank you!

• little binary string in array (of TCP read) to the table of Boolean LV (and back)

  I would like to ask what is the easiest way for the next conversion? We use aTCP Read function to read an incoming binary string to a S7 API using LabVIEW. We know that LabVIEW stores a Boolean value to 8 bits. The incoming binary string contains 14 bits (representing 14 indicators of status). What is the best way to convert these values of 14-bit LabVIEW Boolean table?

  In addition, we send a LAbVIEW Boolean table in the PLC data (to write a TCP) string containing status bits.

  Thank you very much!

  Martins wrote:

  This 30 bytes contains some data more, including 14 bit flags (size is 14 bits). Since the PLC cannot put 'together' (16-bit) words at his side before sending data TCP, 14 bits is padded with 2 bits holding no valueable info.

  Then the solution is simple.  Take your 2 bytes and unflatten in a U16.  Then use Boolean table number.

• Table of Boolean to the number

  I don't know if this has never been worn before, but if so, it's here once again.  Lets say I have a Boolean chart shown with 8 elements willing horizontally.  When I read it, I usually read it left to right, which means that the MSB is on the left and the LSB is on the right.  However, if I use the Boolean to number funtion table, this function read right to left.  Ditto for the number of Boolean function Array, it will form the table from right to left.  This goes against normal Boolean reading habits.  I know that this isn't a bug because it was probably intended to be run as such.  The VI below illustrates what I mean.  Three questions:

  Why is it done this way?

  Why not make the configurable functions to read in both directions?

  The term big-endian to Little Endian applies to the order of the bytes in a word of 16 bits, divided in two bytes.  Worth also on the ILO agenda in a U8?

  The VI are:

  

  Type again casting man escapes from his cage!

  

  I always use 4.x mode when I want to "readable" little tables.

• Is it possible to an array of Boolean function number in a case without the table of Boolean structure?

  Hi guys! In my program, my "robot" (lego mindstorms EV3) has essentially read a code bar and do different things according to the codes bar, he reads and so I have an array of Boolean, and basically I need compare to the other Boolean tables. First of all, I used the "Boolean chart at number" function and then just put it in a structure of the case, but it turns out that the Boolean value to number function is not compatible with my Lego EV3 brick, so I have to find another way to do this. Any ideas?

  Help is appreciated! If you have any questions or if my question is confusing, just ask!

  Thank you.

  
  

• written boolean unique to the module of digital output or 9472

  I have a vi who writes in both modules of analog and digital, 9263 and 9472.

  I don't have a problem writing to the analog modules, but the modules digital (9472) gives me problems.  I want to write a single Boolean value, and he wants a Boolean array.  I was using the DAQ assistant, but dropped on it.  I'm probably not understand how to access the port correctly.

  I've included a partial copy of the code.  (LV crashed when I tried to create a snippet of the original code, so I had to copy it to a new vi.)

  You have not included the Subvi and if you want to generate a single Boolean value, it is absurd to use the Dig generate 1 D data and instance of DAQmx writing. Just use 1Line 1 point. Change the instance by clicking on the polymorphic selector under DAQmx writing. Select Digital > single channel > sample > Boolean. You can also use the DAQ Assistant by plugging in just a function table built between the Boolean command and the input of signals.

  You must also consider writing your code without globals.

• divide table of Boolean

  Hi Sir, I want to ask how to divide an array of Boolean 1 d. for example, I want to put the first 32 bits in column 1, then the 2nd column to and so on... I just want to have a table 2D-32 bits-per-cell... Thank you

  Here is the code of remodel simpler that buffers the last line if necessary.

  

  If you can ensure that the size is divisible by 32, or if you want to ignore the incomplete lines, just wire the 'QI' output directly to the larger size of entry and take additional math.

  If you subsequently want to process 32 elements at the same time, remodeling in 32 lines is much more convenient, for example using autoindexing in a loop FOR, a line of treatment at the same time. Of course, if you want the columns instead, convert after that remodeling as already mentioned.

• Digital table of Boolean

  Hi all

  I'm working on a program where I can input an array of nXy of enumerator that has 3 numerical values of 0,1,2. 0,1,2 values correspond to 3 cases of boolean values constant. Digital and its corresponding Boolean values are given below:

  Numerical value: 0, Boolean values: true, False

  Numerical value: 1: Boolean values: True, False

  Numerical value: 2: Boolean values: True, True.

  So my table values nXy digital hwould turn into nX 2y array of Boolean values with 2 Boolean values corresponding to each digital item in the array. The image shows the transformation that I'm doing.

  To make this work, I took digital and added table 2 loops (one per line) and one for the column of and checked each element of the array to 3 cases. 0,1,2. in each case, I have the Boolean constants corresponding to the case. Given that the nth element of the digital array will lead to Boolean values corresponding to (2 * n) + 1 elements of the array,(2*n) I have a program for that also.

  However, when I released the results, it does not come out properly and I don't know where the logic is wrong. If anyone can help me with this, it will be great.

  GV8 wrote:

  What would you recommend to do for that?

  An initialized change of registry and a bed table (set to concatenate) in the inermost loop. Rest remains the same.

  

• A special selection of the table of Boolean

  I use Labview to prepare to use with AB CompactLogix PLC HMI. The problem for me is that I cannot select a bit special (for example to connect with a button, TRUE/FALSE) in an array of Boolean. What I can do is get a particular tag data (integer type Double) plc using OPC and convert these data into array of Boolean. The table can be represented by a series of 32 buttons (I use a card of entry type 32 PLC input fields). But I want to access only the bit 4 of table boolean and toggle an LED based on its output. How to do this? Help, please!

  Leave the data type as a U32 and use the following code:

  

  1 must be of type U32.

  That should do it.

  Play with this idea, also explore GOLD and XOR actions on U32.

  Tone

• Effective Int32 table in table of Boolean for table Int16

  Have a wide range of Int32 (~ 500 000 elements).

  Each Int32 must be analyzed in two Int16 tables: table 1 the first 12 bits of the Int32, Array 2 is the second 12 bits of the Int32.

  The method I use (see table) works fine but it takes a long time to run (on a relatively slow processor, embedded).

  Does anyone have an idea how to make it run faster?

  Boolean operations on numbers using seems to be quite a bit faster: 42 ms vs ms 280 for 1000000 point tables.  See the image below.

  Also, when I duplicated the code on the image I don't have results you described in your post.  Please post images as .png files.  They can be shipped rigtht in depth with the Insert/edit image button (it looks like a tree).

  Lynn

  

• How to create a grid with the tables and Boolean values?

  As part of a larger project, I'm trying to create a Subvi, which will allow me to spend a "cursor" in a 3 x 3 matrix.

  It should be 2 Boolean inputs, one for move them down in the table and the other to move them to the right. Once reached the edge of the table, the "cursor" will start back at the beginning.

  I have a vague idea of a table to 2 dimensions with LED. Once 'down' has been selected, the corresponding light to (0,0), light (0.1). Goes the same for the button 'right '. When 'down' is pressed (0.2), the LED should turn off, and LED (0,0) must light up.

  I'm sure it has something to do with the initialization of the tables, but I can't seem to find the right way to do it.

  Any help is much appreciated. Thank you!

  Your array is always empty.  Look at the detailed help for the function page replace table subset.  He says that the function has no effect if the specified index refers to a location outside the table.

  What you see on the Panel is only a view and has nothing to do with what is in the table.

  Lynn

• Expect the icon display number in the table of Boolean

  Hello

  Can someone shed some light on a piece very little icon that I receive on a function 'boolean array number?

  I seem to be getting a little "wait" icon superimposed in the corner. The help context entry looks the same, and the feature looks the same (as far as I know).

  The piece of code that I use has been converted to a newer version of V8.5 but apart from who should have nothing unusual about that.

  The illustration below shows the offending icon with another who is fresh out of the palette next to him.

  

  Am I missing something?

  Thanks in advance for advice.

  All the best,

  Ian

  The wrong icon with registers for previous and the new 'sign Extension Modes' right-click menu options that have been added to this feature on the FPGA diagram in LabVIEW 8.6 or later.  The bug was reported as CAR # 122749 and should be fixed in a future release of LabVIEW.  Apparently, the function may return incorrect values when it has a weird icon, so I recommend you remove it and drop a new to the case where.