table to disable AutoScroll

Hello

is it possible to disable the auto scrolling in a table?

I'm doing a refresh very 5 sec of a table that can accommodate up to 50 lines.  Each update, it scrolls to bask on top, but I want to disable this auto-scroll so, even after a refresh, stays of scroll bar where she was before.

with cvi 2010.

Thnaks

Hello

Thanks for your help.

I used the SetActiveCell (only once), and then create the table will all the lines I need.  And then each refresh I add the new values and there is no more no auto scroll.  I can move the scroll bar, as I want and it does not go back to the top or the bottom.

Tags: NI Software

Similar Questions

  • How can I disable AutoScroll frustrating in Windows 7?

    How can I disable AutoScroll frustrating in Windows 7?  Whenever I try to type, or even move the pointer - the scroll bar active!

    From this study, it seems that the touchpad is extremely sensitive.

    Laptops also used to have built in the scroll bars on the bottom and the right side of the touchpads.  I have not seen one in a while and don't know if they start this new practice.

    If you are talking about just the cursor (arrow) on the screen by moving when you press the mouse button (which is integrated in the touchpad) the only real solution is component to the bottom of the sensitivity of the touchpad via Control Panel and learn to control the touchpad without accidental clicks.  I have a wireless entertainment 7000 microsoft keyboard that has sensitive functions of touch as a touchpad, and it may have a bit of a learning curve if you're used to buttons.  Not be your fingers anywhere which is touch sensitive with release of trigger.

    I suggest to get a USB mouse in option (they can be picked up cheap at any retailer important) because they offer better control everything by being better for you ergonomic that are the standard touchpads.

  • AF:table - change disabled property of input text according to the value of the attribute line

    Hello

    I use Jdev 12.1.2.

    I have a table with the number of lines.  Each line has a FutureCode attribute and other attribute FutureComments.  I want to make sure FutureComments is disabled unless the FutureCode of this line is is 'OTHER '.

    I tried to go to the text of the FutureComments component in the table and setting the property to the expression for disabled:

    #{row.bindings.FutureCode.inputValue == 'OTHER'? false: true}

    But it does not work.  I messed around with the parameters in the table (distribution of content, immediate change), but I did not get a configuration so that it can work.

    A little more information, the text input component are always disabled.  I also tried using the expression evaluator in the debugger to check the value of my #{row.bindings.FutureCode.inputValue}, but it is null, no doubt because he does not know what line I'm talking about.

    Any idea on this?  Thank you.

    Hello

    There the lov on future code?

    will not have operator you used? Try

    #{row.bindings.FutureCode.inputValue! = 'OTHER'}

    If this does not work

    Try

    #{row.bindings.FutureCode. attributeValue ! = 'OTHER'}


    Thank you

  • How to enable and disable the buttons on the table

    Hello

    My requirement is that I need to activate or disable the button on the table, if there is no result then I need to turn off the button other wise, I need to activate the button.

    I drag the primary key field on the page as an entry filed the false set visiable page abandoned and set the partial trigger as table and disable button is

    Disable = ' #{bindings. " AuthorizationNumber.inputValue not 'null'}', but the button is still crippling it allows not when I have data.

    where I am doing wrong?

    Note: this view is read-only view, I can't use undo disable features here.

    Published by: user5802014 on May 22, 2010 12:36

    Try the following:

    * Disable = ' #{bindings. " AuthorizationNumber.inputValue == null} "*"

    This will disable the button when the AuthorizationNumber is null.

    You can also use the current row of the iterator:

    * Disable = ' #{bindings. " YourIterator.currentRow == null}. "

    Nick

  • The name of the Table may be 2 lines

    Can the name of the Table "numbers be 2 lines?

    I don't seem to be able to make a table name two lines.  You can use a box of text instead, while hiding the name of the table:

    Disable the table name in the Table formatter (lower-right)

    Add a text box

  • Disable automatic scrolling when using internet

    How can I disable autoscroll while browsing or by entering the information on/in the internet?  I have a new computer running Windows 7.  The system auto scrolls with no activity of the mouse.  This happens when I enter information in the fields.  HELP is very irritating.

    How can I disable autoscroll while browsing or by entering the information on/in the internet?  I have a new computer running Windows 7.  The system auto scrolls with no activity of the mouse.  This happens when I enter information in the fields.  HELP is very irritating.

    Hi Nancy

    The most common cause of this type of this behavior is the parameters of sensitivity of the touchpad on a laptop.

    What happens is that while the user types their hand will be slightly brush the touchpad and causes scrolling.

    Check the touchpad settings in Control Panel. Some newer laptops have shortcut to akeyboard that disables the touchpad when the user uses the keyboard.

    Tell us what you find.

    Thank you for using Windows 7

    Ronnie Vernon MVP
  • Oracle DB 11.2.0.4: Impossible to activate the table lock after having stopped it

    Hello

    I use Oracle Database 11.2.0.4.

    After reading the documentation on how to prevent unwanted table DDL statement.

    I found a way to do this in by issuing 'edit the table < table_name > disable table lock'.

    Turn it off doesn't work, however I can not re - activate.

    The error message is:

    ORA-00054: resource busy and acquire with NOWAIT specified or timeout expired

    I want to activate the lock, because I need to add new columns to this table.

    I was digging on several threads that have the same problem as mine. But none of them gives any acceptable solution.

    Impossible to activate the table lock after disablng it

    ALTER table enable table lock blocking

    However, a poster responds by quoting the documentation that says: (Note: I can't find what doc says)

    'Specify the TABLE LOCK ACTIVATE to activate the table locking, allowing operations on the table DDL. All currently process transactions must commit or roll before Oracle database allows table locking. »


    By the way:

    1. the table is mine and nobody knows there are (therefore, it would be just me which undoubtedly make any DML at it, and I did not).

    2. I've disabled the lock table months ago and tried to turn it back on because I want to add the new column to the table.


    It means that I have to wait for that "ALL transactions running" happening on the current scheme being validated or cancelled?

    The table itself is located on the stops and never schema of production on which transactions take place continuously.


    Is it true that Oracle expects all execute transactions? Is it known bug?

    Why would Oracle wait as all transactions which has nothing to do with the underlying table?

    Is there no workaround solution to solve this?


    Note:

    I tried to deactivate - activate the table locking on the development database (which has less transaction) and it works fine.


    Kind regards


    Buntoro

    Your best option might be suspended from the database. If it is an application of type OTP, it must suspend in some secinds, do your DOF, then get out. Your users should not notice. I have described the mechanism here,

    Quiesce

    --

    John Watson

    Oracle Certified Master s/n

  • disable the constraint

    Hello

    to remove an index PK I disabled the constraint.

    CHANGE TABLE DISABLE CONSTRAINT MAKEY_PK MYTABLE CASCADE;

    Drop INDEX MAKEY_PK;

    Now I'll recreate this KP index.

    Should I do something more to have the same constraints where they were?

    Thank you.

    Just re-create the index and select the constraint.

    SQL > conn aman/aman

    Connected.

    SQL > create table test (number, number of b).

    create table test (a number, b number)

    *

    ERROR on line 1:

    ORA-00955: name is already used by an existing object

    SQL > drop table test is serving;

    create table test (a number const

    Deleted table.

    SQL > Ravel prm primary key number, b);

    Table created.

    SQL > select index_name table_name from user_indexes where table_name ='TEST;

    INDEX_NAME

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    TABLE-NAME

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    PRM

    TEST

    8 selected lines.

    SQL > alter table test disable constraint prm;

    Modified table.

    SQL > drop index prm;

    Drop index prm

    *

    ERROR on line 1:

    ORA-01418: specified index does not exist

    SQL > create index prm on test (a);

    The index is created.

    SQL >

    SQL > insert into test (a) values (1);

    1 line of creation.

    SQL > /.

    1 line of creation.

    SQL > alter table test enable constraint prm;

    ALTER table test forced enable prm

    *

    ERROR on line 1:

    ORA-02437: impossible to validate (AMAN. (PRM) - primary key violated

    SQL > removal of the test;

    2 deleted rows.

    SQL > alter table test enable constraint prm;

    Modified table.

    SQL > insert into test (a) values (1);

    1 line of creation.

    SQL > /.

    insert into test (a) values (1)

    *

    ERROR on line 1:

    ORA-00001: unique constraint (AMAN. PRM) violated

    SQL >

    HTH

    Aman...

  • ALTER TABLE RETRACTABLE is possible online?

    RDBMS Version: 11.2.0.4

    Platform: Oracle Linux 6.4

    We have a database of CARS of Production 2 nodes very critical. To recover the space, we want to cut some large tables. The first table we'll shrink is a 300 GB, which is not partitioned with no LOB table.

    Here are the steps that we'll run.

    Step1.alter mytable table allow the movement of the line;

    Step2.alter mytable table shrink space compact;

    Step3.alter mytable table shrink space;

    Step4.alter table mytable disable the movement of the line;

    STEP 5. COLLECT STATISTICS of the table (because the RETRACTABLE table will cancel all the sliders in the shared pool)

    The steps above will take at least 10 hours to complete a 300 GB table. We would like to know if all of these steps can be done online. That is to say. We do not want the SHRINK command to lock the table and prevents the table to be modified (any DML) by the application

    Doc below said this can be done online. But, MOS DOC 1357878.1 said that it is not and you must use the DBMS_REDEFINITION package if you want to do it online.

    https://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E18283_01/server.112/e17120/schema003.htm

    The MOS article you are talking about is not correct. Outside the DOF at the end of a SHRINK lock when the high tide is shifted, SHRINK the SPACE is an online operation. DBMS_REDEFNITION is actually worse because you have DDL locks at both the beginning and the end. However, in both cases, it is the DDL that is blocked by other operations DML (and not the other way around) so that your users will have no problem. If the narrowing or the redefinition is blocked, you can suspend the database for a few seconds. I described how to do here,

    Database Quiesce

    --

    John Watson

    Oracle Certified Master s/n

  • Is a database table that is required for the temporary interfaces with the data flat file source?

    People, this is the situation I ODI 11.1.1.7

    1. I have an interface temporary (yellow), called MJ_TEMP_INT, which uses data from TWO sets of data from the source in a temporary target (TEMP_TARG). Wrestling is a shot of a data set from a table while the other set of data extracted from a flat file.  A union is made on data sets.
    2. I then create another interface, called MJ_INT, which uses the MJ_TEMP_INT as the source and the target is a real database. table called "REAL_TARGET".

    Two questions:

    1. When I run my second interface (MJ_INT), I get a message "ORA-00942: table or view does not exist" because it is looking for a real TEMP_TARG db table. Why I have to have one? because I am pulling a flat file?
    2. On my second interface (MJ_INT) when I look at the interface of my source MJ_TEMP_INT (yellow) property sheet, the box 'Use the temporary interface as a Derived table' is DISABLED.  Why? Is also because my temporary interface is pulling from a flat file?

    I am attaching a file that shows a screenshot of my studio ODI.

    Furthermore, IF my temporary source interface has only a single set of data by pulling from a database. Table to table in a temporary target, called MJ_TEMP2_TARG, and then when I use this temporary interface as a source to the other another real db. target table (REAL2_TARGET), THEN everything works.  ODI requires me to have a real database. Table MJ_TEMP2_TARG and the checkbox for "interface temporary use as a Derived table" is NOT DISABLED and my REAL2_TARGET table gets filled.

    Thank you in advance.

    Mr. Jamal.

    You quite rightly assume the reasons that you have questions is because you try to attach a file. A file I always have to be materialized in the transit zone, as a temporary table and then have the data loaded in it.

  • Hi people. IM new here. Need to accelerate a clarification on the table!

    We have a scheme of production with 200 ~ tables in my body and I feel the performance of important queries in reports can be increased up to with the approach below.

    Current settings - movement of the line is disabled for all tables.

    What I can,

    (1) to activate the movement of the line with "change the movement line of table_name enable;" ~ This allows the rows in the table to move dynamically remove the unused blocks.

    (2) remove the unused blocks with "alter table table_name retractable space;"

    (3) turn off the movement of the line with "modify the movement table table_name disable;"line ~ this will stop allowing the lines in the table move dynamically.

    If I do, I get free unused blocks or removed making the table to perform at least a little more fast?

    Will there be an impact elsewhere?

    PS - It was never tried before by someone else in our scheme of production.

    See you soon,.

    Rachida.

    India.

    Use the Segment space Advisor to see what are the tables could benefit from a SHRINK

    Hemant K Collette

  • How can I include a table in a table in FrameMaker 12?

    I have a step/Action table that requires the incorporation of an If/table, and then in the Action column. The command to Insert a table in the tab of the Table is disabled with my cursor in the existing step/Action table.

    Where is hidden the feature?

    Any idea is appreciated!

    Kathy

    I agree with FieryPantone, the 'Table to Table' is not the best concept. Information architecture point of view, I would avoid to create a table for a sequence of Action/step. You can take a look at stepsection, steps, step and task of DITA elements as a source of inspiration on how this concept is there.

    That said: FrameMaker can't stand not the 'Table to Table. However, you can anchor a block of text in a cell and then put a table as part of this text. Like this:

  • I can't disable a constraint in SQL Developer

    Here's my question:
    I created a table named pratique1 already.
    Developer SQL PL/SQL using try to run a loop as follows:
    DECLARE
    COUNTER1 NUMBER (2);
    BEGIN
    COUNTER1: = 30;
    ALTER TABLE pratique1
    DISABLE THE CONSTRAINT PRK1;
    LOOP
    COUNTER1: = 30;
    INSERT INTO PRATIQUE1
    VALUES (COUNTER1, 'test7', 8, 9);
    WHEN the OUTPUT COUNTER1 > 26;
    END LOOP;
    END;
    In other words, I insert the value of the variable COUNTER1 as primary key in the field1 column tables.
    I run the script successfully without the ALTER TABLE CONTSRAINT... DISABLE command.
    Whenever I run that I had to increase the starting value of the Variable COUNTER1, so he will not attempt to insert a value pre existed twice in the primary key.
    So I decided to insert the command ALTER TABLE DISABLE CONSTRAINT to do not have to worry about changing the starting value.
    I am able to disable the constraint by using the same command in a vacuum. If I run it through the script as shown above, I get the following error:
    Error report:
    ORA-06550: line 5, column 1:
    PLS-00103: encountered the symbol "ALTER" when expecting one of the following conditions:
    (begin case declare exit end exception for goto if loop mod)
    pragma raise return null select update while with
    < an ID > < a between double quote delimited identifiers of >
    < a variable binding > < < continue close check out lock remove current
    Insert restore open savepoint sql execute commit forall
    purge pipes of fusion
    06550 00000 - "line %s, column % s:\n%s".
    * Cause: Usually a PL/SQL compilation error.
    * Action:
    I would like suggestions.
    Thank you.

    Your question has NOTHING to do with the sql developer.

    Mark this question ANSWER and repost it in SQL and PL/SQL forum.

    https://forums.Oracle.com/community/Developer/English/oracle_database/sql_and_pl_sql

    The problem is that you cannot run the DDL directly in PL/SQL. You must use dynamic SQL statements to execute DDL in PL/SQL.

    RUN IMMEDIATELY ' ALTER TABLE... » ;

    If you need help using the correct, as forum indicated above.

  • Shrink the table, rebuild the index?

    I need to reduce some very large tables after the removal of lines and I want to validate the script to run. I was thinking something like this:
    run_deleting_process;
    change the movement line of table my_tableI enable;
    ALTER table my_table retractable space WATERFALL;
    change the movement line of table my_tableI disable;
    I need to rebuild the index after that?, or if I rebuild the markings, can I delete clause CASCADE of the command? It is recommended to run utltrp.sql after shrink the table?, maybe some dependent object needs to be recompiled after the reduction of a table?
    The database version is 11.1.0.7 and documentation does not specify that the index rebuild is required, but I realized it is a desition normall when the narrowing of the tables.
    Thank you

    No there is no rebuild the index after shrinkage. And if you use "cascade", your index will be supported. You do very well.

    Visit this link as well.

    http://www.orafaq.com/Forum/t/137522/2/

  • Disable all constraints

    My table has many constraints, but I want to load data into this table, so I have to disable constraints, so do we have a SINGLE command to disable all constraints, instead of one by one?

    Thank you

    No there is no universal constraint inability. What you can do, it's a loop around the data dictionary view and use dynamic SQL statements:

    begin
         for all_cons in ( select table_name, constraint_name from user_constraints
                              where constraint_type in ('U', 'P', 'R') )
         loop
              execute immediate 'alter table '||all_cons||' disable constraint '||all_cons.constraint_name;
        end loop;
    end;
    

    Note that this fact that relational constraints. Remove the filter on CONSTRAINT_TYPE if you want to include check constraints as well.

    Update

    I agree with Sybrand warnings. You will need to make sure you are the only user of the database when you perform this loading.

    Cheers, APC

    Published by: APC on 28 March 2013 13:59

Maybe you are looking for