the export of 1080i 29.97 source 1080i 59.94 made

Is it possible to export the FILM SOURCE 1080i (superior) (1.0) 29.97 FPS AS 1080i (superior) (1.0) 59,94 frames per second? This is for public television.

These are the same thing. The 29.97 means "frames" per second, while the 59.94 refers to the 'fields' per second. Since is interlaced 1080i, you will see so-called 29.97 times and 59.94, it's exactly the same thing. There is only a single format 1080i, no variation.

Thank you

Jeff Pulera

Safe Harbor computers

Tags: Premiere

Similar Questions

  • Packets exported 11 g, but when I import on 12 c error of ' the target 11.2.0.3.0 database is an older version of the 12.1.0.1.0 source. Thus the storage clause is ignored to avoid problems of incompatibility between the versions. »

    Packets exported 11 g, but when I import on 12 c having error of ' The 11.2.0.3.0 target database is an older version of the 12.1.0.1.0 source. Thus the storage clause is ignored to avoid problems of incompatibility between the versions. »

    When I export only 1 package and then import, then I have no error and imported successfully, but when I do bulk above mention error comes.


    How can you make with the help of the SQL Developer or query?


    Kind regards.

    The problem is solved since
    Impdp iris/tpstps@PCMS full = Y dumpfile INCLUDE PACKAGE VERSION = 11.2.0.3.0 = packagespcmsTWO.dmp =
    query

  • In the new update, I can't believe that the default Source range in the export settings went from the output sequence.

    Very very disappointed for someone who does a lot of export high speed it has great effect. Does perform a work around?

    Thank you

    Jeff

    If you have activated the workspace, it will be by default Source range: workspace in the export settings. Go timeline menu burger/wing tab, and clear the work area. Who will come back you to the Source range: in and out sequence in the export of parameters.

  • I used to export the pliers cuts Ribbon, but recently - to keep having the same exact video quality as source (analog)! -J' I just export for external HDs (so the computer)... I recently bought the 13-verssion PREM and I tried (I think) everything b

    I used to export clips cuts to the Ribbon (version 9.0), but recently I bought version 13.0 of FIRST and - to keep the exact same video quality as source (analog)! -J' I export simply for external HDs (so actually at the computer)... but everything I try, I noticed that when I check the hardware with the original of the first export clip is NOT ONLY SMALLER but ALSO FACT do NOT SEEM to HAVE THE SAME RESOLUTION, DETAILNESS, SHARPNESS (or whatever you call it)... What I am doing wrong? WHAT SETTINGS should I HAVE to DO in order to KEEP the SAME IMAGE QUALITY (or even improve) to be STORED on the COMPUTER?     Thank you, RVH

    How do you export?

  • export plugin: how to learn the path of the source of the exported files?

    Short version: an export plugin to determine the path of the source of an image that was exported as a copy in a temporary directory?  If so, how?

    Long version...

    I am a user SDK newbie, writing a plugin which implements multiple images to my own external program which them melts and produces one or more new images that the user probably wants to reimport into Lightroom.

    I have the plugin works OK with export to a temporary directory.

    Now I would like to add a feature in which my program gets access to the path of the folder to the original image, so that it can offer the user the ability to record images of result in the same directory.

    Is it possible for the export plugin get the source for an exported image path, say an object of rendering?

    Can also export plug-in information identical or similar, otherwise, for example by determining the path for the folder that is currently selected in the Lightroom Catalog?

    Thanks for your suggestions!

    -Rik

    I don't think that the metadata for source path are in the exported file.

    Once I manually coded the source path in the jpeg file to export, but I stopped doing that, now I just save some info I need as part of the ID "at a distance" (assuming that to publish the service).

    But maybe I misunderstood. I mean, when export the source path is readily available as rendition.photo:getRawMetadata ('path') - is that what you mean? (I thought before that you were speaking after export, possibly loooong after export...).

    Rob

  • CS4: Clearly the source, but the motion blur of the output gives the export

    Hello!

    When exporting my videos imported into CS4, quick movement appears blurry, even if the source is much clearer.

    Demo 1: Source, output
    Demo 2: Source, output

    I was hoping someone could explain to me why the output is much more blurred and if possible, how to fix it.

    Sequence options:
    I tried a bunch of sequence different presets such as AVCHD/AVC-Intra/HDV/XDCAM/P2, or custom options (parameter FPS to 29.97, 30, 59.94, 60 fields/up/down, change the display format), but the output is blurry, no matter what I try. Made with upper/lower case fields does not; so the progressive setting is probably correct.

    I have also created a project without a sequence, imported the clip and it has exported directly; the output was still unclear.

    Export options:
    I used recommended an export preset for export on Vimeo (see paragraph CS4), which uses the H.264.

    Information about the source clips:
    They are filmed with my GoPro Hero HD cam to 720 p 60.
    MediaInfo output: video, audio
    Output of GSpot
    Interpretation of the creation of a clip

    My system:
    Windows 7. 4 GB of Ram, but 32 bits, up to 2.8 GB of RAM is used.
    Intel Core i3 550, 3.20 GHz
    Video card: Nvidia Geforce 8800GTS 320 MB of RAM
    1 monitor

    I hope that this information is sufficient, please let me know if there is anything I should add.
    Even if it is not possible to fix it, I hope someone can explain to me why the output is so different from the source!

    Thank you!

  • Change to error in the export file in the order of the elements in the array of construction

    Hello world

    Some time ago I wrote a vi file that performs the following operations:

    As a first step, it initializes a camera and chooses a region of interest (ROI). Data on the return on investment will be eliminated.

    Then he raster scan engine stage in x and y axis, in bidirectional mode (meaning that x alternating between sweeping left to right and from right to left as is inreased).

    For each point of the analysis, the spectrum is collected, which is then integrated into lambda to give an idea of the total intensity.

    Then the intensity is plotted, as well as the spectrum at each point.

    The final results are exported to a text file.

    The problem:

    If I reverse the order of the son in the 'build' table prior to exporting the file, place the Total Count (intensity) wire instead of thread of the spectrum, the export file fails. By "fails", I mean it's the .txt file contains characters that resemble Chinese!

    Why is this?

    I enclose my .vi, as well as two screenshots that show the problem.

    Hooovahh wrote:

    Such a small change, should not have such a strange result.  I advise to use some debugging tools like highlight the enforcement tools, probe and breakpoint to see what data is when it runs.

    http://www.NI.com/gettingstarted/labviewbasics/debug.htm

    The Source is in 2011.  I see an opportunity and a potential work around certain things to try.

    1. take the following steps

    • Select each stacked sequence right click and "convert flat sequence.

    • Select each flat sequence and delete the sequence

    It could simply fix it by itself you want to turn auto-growth on surrounding structures

    2 allows to observe the data in the table build

    • For all wires that are sgl heading construction table insert a dbl and a copy of Allways

    What I suspect LabVIEW is incorrectly re-use of buffers for the inhabitants of sequence

  • Disqualification - file in a directory at the end of the export process

    Hello

    I use Disqualification 12.1.3 (just started). I was wondering if it is possible to have a process where you have a DB table or flat file as the source and, after some cleaning tasks, in the last step instead to write the results in a table DB etc, if it is possible to create a text file with the results (for example, .csv or .txt) and drop this file into a particular directory? If so, could you please explain how I can achieve this?

    Concerning

    Yes of course.

    Export of results or data to a file is simple. Create a database based on files, and then create an export job that takes data from a data Interface (if you never want the output of stage) or staged data (if you do) and written in the file. When you configure a job that contains the task of export you can choose to write the file every time (default) or add to the file.

    If export is running on the client is capable to export data from anywhere you can connect using your client - but this export task is then client-side (ask about data on the client and server stores in the online help) and must be run manually from the client. If you want to run the export under regular treatment, the export must write the file on the server of landing zone ([local home] / default landing, but you can replace it with another directory provided that he is a user of Disqualification has write access application server, using a line in the director.properties file.) For example, on my Windows Server, I have several Disqualification case who share a landing at C:\edqlanding. All servers have the following entries in director.properties:

    landingarea = C\:\\edqlanding (the extra backslash is used to escape from the colon and the backslash for Java to recognize the path.

    If you need to later move the file somewhere else, you could do this with the help of an external task (for example call a simple script), or some other tool (for example Oracle Managed File Transfer). This may be necessary permissions etc network readers that Disqualification will not generally.

    Kind regards

    Mike

  • The export of the LCM command line user (Utility.sh)

    Hi all

    I am trying to export native user and groups of Hyperion (11.1.2.3) using the Utility.sh

    Here's the export.xml

    <? XML version = "1.0" encoding = "UTF-8"? >

    package <>

    < LOCAL > en < / REGIONAL settings >

    < user name = "admin" password = "{LCM} C0Qwtudeb4QxL7z34VMnKZSTdqynz/6lgJAlOGgX86daOzORqtQIiZvA4" / >

    < task >

    < source type = 'Application' product = 'HUB' project = application of the 'Foundation' = 'Shared Services' / >

    < target type = 'File system' filePath = "/ tmp" / >

    < artifact recursive = "false" parentPath = "" / native Directory ' pattern = 'Groups' / > "

    < artifact recursive = "false" parentPath = "" / native Directory ' pattern = 'Users' / > "

    < / task >

    < / packages >

    Running the command

    /U01/Oracle/middleware/user_projects/epmsystem1/bin/utility.sh export.xml b/U01/hpacp /.

    I received the message:

    Migration of the artifacts of Foundation/Shared Services/u01/hpacp/tmp

    131 users exported successfully. It is a status messages. No action required.

    Artifact exported - users.

    Exports 21 groups successfully. It is a status messages. No action required.

    Artifact exported - groups.

    Migration status - success

    However, when I look at/u01/hpacp/tmp, found nothing of her.  The files in this directory permission is 777.

    Is there something wrong with my export.xml? Or I missed in the export of the measures?

    Kind regards

    Christine

    That's what I did

    Utility.bat Export.xml b E:\Oracle\Middleware, guess what instead of create E:\Oracle\Middleware\tmp he created a file called Middleware.zip under E:\Oracle and if you unzip Middleware.zip you will get the tmp directory.

    To check if you have hpacp.zip under/U01

    Concerning

    Celvin Kattookaran

  • Color change in the exported sequence (Premiere Pro)

    Short description: colors in exported from first and downloaded movies on YouTube do not match the colors of the source that were imported in the firstimages.


    Background: I use tool of digital color meter from Apple to read the colors on my poster and Apple Preview to display image (PNG) files.  To eliminate the effect of color profiles, I put my 'Generic RGB profile' poster (which, as far as I know, does not change the R:G:B values).

    Description: I made a sample consisting of a single color animation and exported an image as image file.  Such color as displayed in my animation software, that's what I've specified (R:G:B): 255:0:255, as it is in the exported image as seen in Premiere Pro.  However, if I export a MOV file in Premiere Pro, upload that file to YouTube and play, the color is: 251:0:254.  Also, if I open the MOV file in QuickTime Player and export an image, the color in this context is 251:0:254.

    Question: what causes this color change, and how can I eliminate it?


    N.B.: This isn't 'gamma changeQuickTime Player' (at length elsewhere).  The color as read in QuickTime Player is 242:13:207 - a large and easily visible difference and who does not appear in other players MOV (ex: Player Flip).

    I JUST DISCOVERED SOMETHING!

    I was testing my single color sample. MOV file on different browsers, and I noticed that he had a slight color change between when YouTube first loaded (Chrome browser) video and when he played.  When I stopped it at the first point loading and read the value of the color, is 255:0:255 - just what I wanted.

    I now believe that the video I'm generating is correct and YouTube does not alter the video as part of the Uploader, but it changes in reading it.

    So, I'm done.

  • Preset and actual resolution to the export of the project

    I'm PE11 video edition.

    Source of GoPro's 1080@60. He has not preset in PE for this resolution and framerate so I chose a preset with AVCHD squarepixel 720p@60 by mistake. Couple days of editing before I realized that it, and from what I see, I can not change the resolution of project now...

    So the question is:

    If the original file is 1080 p, the project preset is 720 p and I export it with setting 1080 p - did I lose this quality/resolution? I mean, DON'T downsample my 720 p video and then change again to 1080 p? Who would lose quality result. Like trying to save 480 p 720 p etc. ?

    Or maybe, it's just internal preset for the purporse only edition and in the end, I get my files original 1080 p?

    IF IT ISN'T... Can I somehow copy my work on the new project defined as fullhd?

    faziasty

    Thanks for the reply.

    Let me clarify the 3rd of the 3 for what I believe to be your choice for this project under the above circumstances.

    Major circumstances... that's what you now... you set a project 720 p 60 preset for your project 1080 p 60, made your changes, cannot go back to set the parameters of the correct project (1080 p 60) unless you open a new project and start from the beginning. If you have more files 1080 p 60 to add to this project, fine. If this is not the case, head for the export of this timeline to 1080 p 60 content using the workflow details I already posted. I mean that the result will not be as bad as you seem to be projecting. This seems to be the only choice in the circumstances to save this project.

    Thanks for the details on your question on why export same size of file for your 720 p and 1080 p.

    According to the description of how you made the comparison, the same or comparable file size would be expected for these exports.

    Consider that each will have the same bitrate (32 Mbit/s) and duration of 9 seconds.

    32 MB/s (megabits per second) x 9 seconds = 288 megabits

    If we convert these 288 megabits in KB (kilobytes per second), we get 36000 KB (kilobytes) like the estimated file size.

    Compare my calculations with what you have observed in fact

    720 p file, 35649 KB

    1080 p file, 35659 KB

    Please consider.

    Looking forward to your results according to your schedule.

    RTA

  • How can I get rid of the black box around the exported video?

    I am importing video recorded with OBS in resolution 1920 x 1080. Watch the video, it seems fine. But once I run the video in Adobe first Elements 9, when I export it as a file .m2t in resolution 1920 x 1080, it has a thick black box around the video. The video source is in .mp4 format. Can someone help here?

    Versions prior to version 11 of Premiere Elements must have their projects manually configured to match the source media.

    Start a new project, in the project Panel, click settings and select project settings that correspond to your video specifications. This can be difficult because you are not editing video camcorder but the video which is produced by a third-party software. You will probably need open a sample of this video G Spot or Media Info in order to get the exact resolution, the frame rate and audio and video codecs that are in use - and, in the Premiere Elements 9 version, these codecs are not fully supported.

    You can try the free download of version 13 and see if it works better with your video. Earlier versions of the software were much greater with sources video camcorder and non-standard.

  • 4.0 ai2: wish that the export for not writing tool option date in the output of export file

    Hello

    The new export feature Cart in 4.0 that can be run as a command of sdcli is a very popular feature

    As an improvement, I would like to see an option in the export tool where it is possible to choose whether the date should be

    written in the file result of export or not. Currently, it is always written in the output of export file.

    Why I don't want a line whose date is when you create one or more result export files, using the

    function directly in a directory of the source code management, for example a SubVersion directory, the export of the basket sdcli

    will be almost always indicated as changed because of the line with the date, even if the exported data are unchanged.

    Would it not possible to add such export tool option for the new version 4.0 of SQL Developer?

    With sincere friendships.

    Christian

    There is now a preference to determine the behavior of date. This just missed getting into ai2 but will be there in the next EA.

  • Query in the export of files in a data file

    Hello
    I did a project for the export of files in a data file using this link below:

    http://www.Oracle.com/WebFolder/technetwork/tutorials/OBE/FMW/ODI/odi_11g/odi_project_ff-to-FF/odi_project_flatfile-to-flatfile.htm

    My project works very well. Here, the source file is local m/c (C:\Oracle\Middleware\Oracle_ODI1\oracledi\demo\file).
    (1) what should I do if the source file is located in a remote m/c(says its' ip is 172.22.18.90)?
    (2) will cause no problem if the remote m / c operating system is unix
    Thank you
    Papai

    NB:-my m / c OS is windows 7.

    If you can access the other machine as a sharing folder then provide the same path in the physical schema as \\my_other_pc_on_shared\new_folder

    If you can't access it, and then create an agent on this machine that can access the path and run your project by using the agent.

    Thank you
    Chantal
    http://bhabaniranjan.com/

  • Different sound level on the exported audio files?

    Today, I opened Audition, created a session multitrack with sampling frequency 44100KHz, 2 channels (stereo) and 32-bit depth.

    I tried to merge a part of a song with the rest of another song, but I realized that the hearing has a low sound level as Windows Media Player or any other media player.

    I looked for any configuration that could make WMP change the original sound, but he did play the song with the original sound level

    If I have the low sound of hearing was something that wouldn't stay in the exported file.

    But he did! And it was always like that, not just today.

    What should I do?

    It is not entirely clear as to where is your lower level, but if you're talking about level hearing on the mixing being 3dB lower than what happens when you play multitrack, then the answer is simple - you need to reset the pan law-3dB center left/right cut (logarithmic) - this option is in the preferences > multitrack at the top of the pane. This will give you the same level on a file drop-down mixed or exported as you see on the screen.

    But if you talk of levels of listening about, then it is very difficult to make useful comparisons to all levels of output. WMP and hearing use drivers and completely different engines, to the sounds of Windows via the Windows mixer - which changes even when reading levels. Hearing, if it goes directly to an audio device via an ASIO driver, don't get disturbed by the operating system in the slightest (that is the idea...), but if she gets plugged into the operating system for the output, then once more, the level can be changed through the Windows mixer.

    But in the final analysis, it's not really important. Hearing files can be standardized so that the peaks are just below 0 dBFS, and if you do that, they will play correctly on any other player. If they seem to be more silent, it will be because of the overall volume of the file, and it is a decision of mix - nothing to do with the format of file at all. And this is often a problem with the mixture of two songs from different sources together - if it is been compressed a lot to make it sound louder and the other does not, while the levels will never match perfectly to the join, whatever you do. Your only recourse here would be to compress the most calm one more to match the first - but that 's going to change the sound, probably in ways you might not like.

    So, quite a lot of options, really.

Maybe you are looking for