To the bottom of the sample unnecessarily high resolution in the book?

Similar Questions

• Images high resolution that I matter IIN indesign appear in a definition very mlauvaise to the screen and once exported to pdf, they are still quite far from the original. Perhaps to remedy these problems.

  Images high resolution that I import in indesign appear in a very bad definition on-screen and when exported to pdf, they are still quite far from the original. Perhaps to address these problems?

  The bad export quality could be linked to the pre-selection of PFD you have chosen. Some of the presets are designed to re - sample images to make a smaller final PDF

• Import of high-resolution images of ArcGIS (PC) to Illustrator C4 (Mac)-"Cannot take place due to an error" / "the file size is too big.

  I make a great conference poster that will contain images of ArcGIS. The poster will be 92 "x 42" and Imaging will cover 91 by 22 in the page. The problem is that I need very high resolution for imaging, but illustrator won't import my files. I use ArcGIS 10.3 on Windows 10 and Illustrator C4 with OS X 10.11.1 (El Capitan). I was not able to import any .tiff file into illustrator (is this possible?) and I get "cannot take place due to an error" or "the file is too big" errors when I try to put .jpeg, .png, .ai files exported from the GIS. I think that the problem is due to the differentoperating systems, rental However, can I open and edit (resize etc.) files in preview without any problem, so there is also a problem with Illustrator. The files that I use are more than 150 MB at 300 dpi, but I really prefer to use 600 dpi, Illustrator can't handle these files sizes? I don't want to lose the resolution using .jpeg, .pdf, etc., many types of compression will cause problems with vector layers from ArcGIS.  Please notify!

  Update your AICS4 to something with the ability to access more than 3 GB of memory RAM as CS6 or above. You'll never work with CS4, at least not to the resolution as you seem to think you need. Indeed, you could probably use 150ppi or the bottom of the poster and not obviously nothing to lose. And for the record, I worked for 17 years for the USGS working with ARCGIS and AI.

• Background image extends all the way to higher resolutions

  I created a web page and my client wanted a slideshow to meet throughout the site with the top scrolling content. I thought I did it correctly because it was beautiful on each monitor until I saw on higher resolution than 1080 p. When I have plenty of screen it the bottom of the picture ends and there is space. I have attached a picture.

  The website is killerspirit.net

  I was not on this subject the right way? The bottom must be static, while the content of the page scrolls on it so I made a slideshow that I extended edge of the page. I didn't know how else to do this. Any help would be appreciated.

  

  I found this site for example:

  Paddymazz Productions

  It would be just like that except a design of a page with the content of the scroll on the background image.

  Hi Patrick,

  Muse does not sensitive site because of which when you view the site on different dimensions, the site will make differently.

  Can you confirm the height of the slide show you have inserted in the background and can you try to increase the height and check if it solves the problem?

  Kind regards

  Akshay

• still image from the video in high resolution

  Aloha

  How can I get a fixed high resolution image of my video on final cut pro x?

  Mahalo

  FFrom print? You can not. Video only has a dpi of resolution. You need an app like Photo Zoom Pro for uprez the image.

• The photos in photo looks blurry, with large pixels. Recorded images were of high resolution, why what is happening?

  I used the migration assistant to transfer all the data from my old macbook pro to my new iMac, now the images in the Photos seem to be blurred, with large pixels. Recorded images were of high resolution, why what is happening? Is it possible to fix it. In the old macbook pro, the image looks ok.

  Migration assistant has a really bad experience with iPhoto and Photos

  If you still your old MB of available space, connect it to your new Mac (network, mode target firewire or use an external to the Mac OS extended (journaled) format hard drive and drag the iPhoto library folder images on the new Mac and heck the iPhoto library to icon in the Dock to migrate Photos)

  I hope this will work better

  LN

• Replace the screen for one with a higher resolution on Satellite P850-12Z

  Hi all

  I read a lot on the internet about the replacement of the screen on computers laptop toshiba and also I saw a video on [how to replace the screen for a Toshiba Satellite P855 | http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ncz3ZaI2I-s].

  Is it possible to replace the screen for a Toshiba Satellite P850 12Z (original: 15.6"@1366x768) to another screen with a higher resolution (say: 15.6"@1920x1080 or 15.6"@1600x900)?

  I'm sure that the graphics card is able to function perfectly with this screen (nVidia GeForce GT630M 2048 MB dedicated) and also I read a lot on laptop screen replacement, and I know that this screen has a connector 40 pin and it is an LED Panel, so I won't have to worry about the ups.

  I found several screens (15.6"@1920x1080) who say they are compatible with Toshiba, but I wan't to make sure a higher resolution Panel replacement is possible.

  Thank you in advance.

  Hello

  Exchange of the display is not supported by Toshiba, so I don't think that someone here can help you with this.
  I assume that Toshiba offers multiple views for this model of laptop. Only seller is different but resolution 1366 x 768 is always the same as on the original laptop specification.

  You can try to contact the nearest Toshiba service provider and ask for help. If someone can help you with that service of Toshiba. They have access to the database of Toshiba and can possibly tell if another view is usable on your machine.

  All this is quite complicated.

• HP 6500 scan high resolution works well with the solution Center HP; but is solid black w/imgage software for editing

  I got an OfficeJet 6500.

  If I try to scan a picture at a very high resolution, using an image of image editing software will come out black.

  I can scan the image using the HP solutions, at the same high resolution Center, and the image will scan very well.

  I think there is a setting for the Windows operating system that needs to be adjusted. I know because I had this same problem once before.

  I found the solution to my problem. but my computer crashed and I had to reinstall the full Windows operating system. I lost the changes I had made. It was in January 2011.

  I don't remember when I had the answer to my problem but I thought that I asked the question in the HP forum (it would have been some time in late 2010) and then someone answered with the solution to my problem. But I can't find the post I did then.

  -My operating system is Windows 7, with a 64-bit operating system.

  -The processor is an Intel Celeron 2 .50GHz.

  I would appreciate any help someone can offer.

  Hello JimTrail

  After watching this on the web, it seems that you is maybe to something. From what I found, GIMP uses a lot of resources, especially true for larger images. He isn't able to handle the scanning of an image as large as 4800dpi without additional RAM or virtual memory to compensate for the RAM.

  My suggestion would be to increase the size to the recommended or higher. Out of curiosity how much physical RAM have you? Microsoft recommends that virtual memory for no more than 3 times the amount of RAM installed. See article: change the size of virtual memory.

  You can also see the article below on the Tile Cache GIMP.org.

  How to set your Tile Cache

• Higher resolution than the standard resolution is bad for your mac?

  Hi guys,.

  So my mac works normally on 1440 x 900, but with an application, I can go to full screen resolution supports and which is 2880 x 1800.

  So I was wondering, is - this bad for my mac? Is it bad for the map display, battery, processor, video or something else?

  Or is it perfectly save?

  Thanks in advance.

  If your Mac CAN operate at a higher resolution, everything that said is the lowest resolution you were using before was not the maximum resolution for your Mac.

  On CRT screens, you could push a little and squeeze more pixels horizontally on the screen than recommended.

  LCD flat screens have a pixel on the screen corresponds to a pixel in memory, the maximum resolution, and no compression is possible. Try to post more than that and he either cut them off or the screen goes wonky.

• I use images fixed high resolution but when the vid play they blur. They look strong when I stop. ***?!

  I use images fixed high resolution but when the vid play they blur. They look strong when I stop. ***?!

  Never had this problem before or on iMovie.

  Try to set a better quality in the view drop-down list top right of the Viewer window.

• With a high resolution, the proportions of my photos and slides is false.

  With a high resolution, the proportions of my photos and slides is false. To show the ration of good appearance, got very low resolution. I searched in the vein of a cure, but certainly there must be a.

  Hello

  1. What is the native resolution of the image?

  2. What if this problem occurs with all the pictures?

  These problems usually occur due to the low native resolution. To change the native resolution of the image, you can use pictures digital high resolution.

  Hope the information is useful.

• How to manage the high resolution of the images for 9860/9850 devices?

  The recently published 9860/9850 device having a display of 800 x 480.

  This means that we need to recompile applications with high resolution images for this device? Is it possible to have the BONES emulate 320 x 480 for the App (it's what iOS does for their retina display).

  Otherwise, I see this break many apps.

  Thank you

  -MO

  VK = virtual keyboard

  It's an investment of time very wise to make the resolution app agnostic, so that the layout is relative to the available real estate.

  In this way only a few minor assets will have to be updated and the application will still work out of the box.   According to the design of the application (i.e. using bitmaps full vs tile stuff) it might even not need to be adjusted at all.

  5.0 + provides a high quality, scaling, it is a valid option (I use it to support 5.0 320 x 240 devices, using the same assets than 7.0).

• Place the photos high resolution in InDesign - look terrible when I resize down! Does not work why!

  I'm a beginner with InDesign, so I'm looking for very clear instructions. I work with CS6 on a ballot. When I place very large, high resolution photos in and then try to resize the terrible resolution looks down.  I use the tool place during the import. At first I thought it was because I use the 'content to the chassis Fit' tool and who had settled the proportions. So I tried to "Adjust the frame proportionally" and who did not, any more than "automatic adjustment". I have tried to place photos and then making a control + drag to resize down - it did not work. I looked at preferences - file handling - preserve Image Dimensions (I deselected that option). Also, did not work. I wonder if the resizing affects pixels, but I don't know where to find it in InDesign. I found the instructions for Photoshop on the choice of Image - resize the Image, but not in InDesign. The other thing, on what I am wondering is that I put these pictures in a text box - which could cause problems with the resolution? Should I be placing them another way?

  Any advice would be appreciated with gratitude!

  You should always use one of the options adjustment proportional to avoid distortion. This may mean that you need to change the shape of the image frame allows you to adapt the shape of the image, or crop the image to take into account the shape of the frame. It is a reality.

  I'm starting to think that some or all the original problem may be in the jpeg compression, and I doubt that Pixillion Image Convertor is a good choice for downsampling (which isn't the same thing as compression). You can post one of these pictures somewhere for us to watch?

• Doubt on the export of pages in JPG format at high resolution with Indesign

  Hello

  I use to work two software, your skill of QuarkXpress and Indesign. If I had to choose one, I prefer Indesign, it is very nice and I love it, but I have to work with the software.

  Well, I have a doubt about the use of Indesign method to export a page in JPG, high-resolution, because QuarkXpress do the same job, but in a different way, so my doubt is about the quality of the files produced.

  It is a very technical issue, if someone with experience in the professional press and print or an Adobe expert could answer, I would be grateful.

  InDesign, producing a poor quality file or QuarkXpress that producing a poor quality file?

  My question is as follows:

  I opened a document in Indesign, and I decide to export it. To simplify things, we have a unique page DIN A4 document.

  So I tell Indesign to export the pageand I want a JPG, high-resolution 300 DPI file.

  Indesign do his job very well, and produce the file exported. This is a JPG file, there are 300 dpi.

  If I open the document in Photoshopand I'm going to... Image of ... Image size...

  I see the Indesign document indicates the exact measurements of a DIN A4 210 x 297 mm and the resolution of the file, I have 300 DPI.

  Therefore seems to be that indesign has done a great job.

  Very well.

  Now, I explain what is happening with QuarkXpress.

  I do the same thing, I have a document to a single page, DIN A4 and I export it as JPG format at high resolution of 300 dpi.

  Well, now QuarkXpress, create the file and I open the file in Photoshop.

  Surprise.

  The file has larger than DIN A4 and a lower resolution dimensions!

  Exactly, QuarkXpress produce a jpg of the following dimensions: 874,89 x 1237,9 mm and a resolution of 72 dpi

  When I see 72 dpi, I think that the document is in low resolution. However, I have a larger document?

  I open the QuarkXpress file in Photoshop, then I uncheck resampling, in this way Photoshop will never change the image. Now, I change the value of resolution of 72 dpi, 300 dpi, which is the value I want.

  And what happens? What happens is that I get a document with measurements of a DIN A4 and also at 300 DPI.

  ???

  So basically QuarkXpress does the same work in Indesign, but in a different way.

  The file QuarkXpress are 2.29 MB more or less. The Indesign file are 3.84 MB more or less.

  So why these differences?

  Which method is the best and why Indesign produce a different file to QuarkXpresss?

  See you soon

  As far as I know, the ppi is not the required metadata for the images.

  So Im guessing that Quark exports jpg ppi worthless.

  But Photoshop is to assign a value of ppi when it opens an image without specified ppi value.

  This value is be 72, but it could be anything, because the pixel dimensions do not change.

• What is the best way to archive images high resolution for cloud storage?

  I have a library of 100 gigabytes. Is it possible to retain the vignettes catalog and image on my computer, but archive images high resolution for cloud storage somewhere in order to save space on my hard drive? If so, is it possible that Lightroom can automatically recover if they are needed, IE. If I want to print or export the image?

  Lightroom does not really work with images cloud storage.

  If you want to archive the images in the cloud, you will need to do this manually and get the images manually. (Which means there are plenty of chances to make a mistake, and so I do not recommend this unless you are sure to 100%, you know what you're doing in both the fine mist of things and with Lightroom)

  Or you could buy an external HD, which are relatively expensive and move the photos here.