Similar Questions

• I used even to make the Blurays for a long time, with success, with no problems. Today, on my current project (.iso file estimated size ~ 19 GB) MENUS rendering time is reported as 31 + Hrs. Is this OK, or is there a problem?

  My system: 2013 Mac Pro: Core, 64 GB of Ram, two GPU of D700 12 / 3GB. I was creating an ISO image file using ENCORE 6. I am currently using the latest ADOBE CC system.

  The menu on which rendering takes a while has three normal buttons linking to 3 first videos produced. The menu has a long file AUDIO (about 90 minutes) as an attachment.

  After letting the rendering process to continue for 4 hours, on the audit of the progress window, progress bars seemed not to be ahead. I waited 2 + hours of overtime and checked again. Progress bars have been in the same place (no deposit). Activity monitor showed that still was still running. At this point, I cancelled the task. Then, I wanted to just MAKE THE MENUS. It is currently running for the 95 + last minutes. Details 'Render' reported ~29.5+ hours as TIME REMAINING. The number of processed IMAGES currently shows ~ 27000 + showing as 169065 in total. The meter for executives of the ongoing transformation to increment of the above stated figure of snapshot of 27000.

  I think that maybe I should let it continue to operate at the end (i.e. 30 hours of rendering time, if all goes well). Is - this sound NORMAL?

  Any advice will be appreciated.

  Never tried such an audio file for a long time. Are you sure that there is no video movement in this menu?

  What format is the audio file?

• Rendering time 12 times faster or slower depending on GPU accelerated effects?

  Hello world!

  I use first Pro CC on a new powerful enough Windows system (a young i7 cpu, 64 GB of ram, double cards GTX 760) and just test its rendering performance.

  I have a 20 minute video with 6-7 video effects applied (on its whole length), only for testing purposes. All these effects are GPU accelerated, chosen from the built-in PP. I also enabled the GPU acceleration for the EMT (Mercury playback engine) in the project settings and the render bar in the upper part of the chronology is completely yellow (not red), so that everything seems nice and good to go. I then export it and it's pretty fast, rendering time is about 12 times faster than when I export in Disabling the GPU acceleration in the project settings (by selecting the 'Software MPE' option only). So everything looks good so far.

  Now, when I add to clip an single effect which is NOT a GPU accelerated (from built-in PP ones) I noticed that the bar made totally blushed and time of export (always with active MEPS GPU) is now the same as if I exported with the option "software MPE only! (approximately 12 times slower than before!).

  Is this "normal" guys? or am I missing something here? I mean, one effect 'enough' to slow down the entire accelerated by GPU export process? (and essentially "cancellation" of all the benefits of GPU acceleration speed)?

  If anyone can help? Thanks in advance!

  I'd say it's normal.  Indeed, with the addition of this effect, I could even expect to take more than software mode without this effect, you add in the calculation process.

• Question about the accuracy of the Total remaining time for battery in Power Meter

  Mr President.

  I checked several laptops that are of the same model, one of them cannot display "Total time remaining" in the power meter. Even other laptops may display, but the values are equivocal. Sometimes the 'remaining power' is 80%, but 'Total remaining time' is 1H20Mins. And sometimes, the "remaining power 'is 75% ', but"the Total remaining time"is 1H30Mins.

  How Windows calculates the 'Total remaining time? I found what OS will have one or two minutes to display "Total remaining time" after I have the power cable plug-out.

  Which is appreciate to get your answer.

  Horky

  The remaining computing power comes from the numere questioning power management drivers and is a fairly complex calculation based on current usage (the amount of energy is consumed), the capacity of the battery (what total capacity is left and how fully charged is battery) and can also vary depending on what else is plugged into the USB port of the computer , what accessories (memory, video card, etc.) are installed, how good or bad, the battery is to maintain a charge and so on.  There is no particular reason to believe that maybe outside the right-out-of-the-box everything two laptops will show the same calculation even if they are all the same brand and model.

  "Horky.Chen" wrote in the new message: * e-mail address is removed from the privacy... *

  Mr President.

  I checked several laptops that are of the same model, one of them cannot display "Total time remaining" in the power meter. Even other laptops may display, but the values are equivocal. Sometimes the 'remaining power' is 80%, but 'Total remaining time' is 1H20Mins. And sometimes, the "remaining power 'is 75% ', but"the Total remaining time"is 1H30Mins.

  How Windows calculates the 'Total remaining time? I found what OS will have one or two minutes to display "Total remaining time" after I have the power cable plug-out.

  Which is appreciate to get your answer.

  Horky

• Total connection time how to account with GANYMEDE.

  Hi, we have the following scenario, this company uses two methods for remote access (for employees only): through RAS connections, or by using VPN clients to connect to a 535 PIX over the Internet. We need to do accounting for the total connection time, in the case of RAS connections is easy, we run AAA GANYMEDE + between the RA and the ACS (ver 2.1) and check the start/end time. But with the Internet connection start/stop time reflects the total time for each connection by user i.e. telnet, snmp, ftp, etc. but what connections can be simultaneous (or not), so we can not just add every time total of connections to a single user, it could be greater than the actual time that this user has been really connected. So how could account us for in this case total connection time?

  Thanks in advance for your recommendations

  Unfortunately you don't have. Accounting for users in the PIX VPN is on the Board to design for some time now, but so far has not been implemented. You can check the status on bug ID CSCdu01327 for other updates.

• Lead story total visit time?

  Hi all

  Is it possible to mark a contact based on the site total visit time?

  I didn't see any relevant conditions filter in the filters of contact. Is there another way?

  Thank you

  Rama

  Rama,.

  Technically, you could.  There are two ways that you could do in E9.

  (1) If you really want to do it through a filter, it would be pushing the data in the "Total" field to a custom Contact field, the profile of the field, then you can use a contact filter.

  (2) as this will be used for lead scoring with the program generator, you can create a Condition based on the "Total time" profile field or even a Segment (if there is considered desired compound variables) then use the Condition or the Segment of your decision rule to determine the way to score.

  Option 2 does not make you give up a contact field, which might be better. You learn how to do both of these tactics in the profiling Web course.

  Let me know if it works for you.

  Amma

• total run time based on sql id?

  Hello

  I wrote under query to find out the total run time sql and total executions happened based on sql id for each date. Can you get it someone please let me know if the output below is correct?

  SQL> SELECT
    trunc(begin_interval_time, 'DD'),
    ROUND(sum(elapsed_time_delta)/1000000) "Total Execution Time (sec)",
    ROUND(sum(executions_delta)) "Total Execution"
    FROM dba_hist_sqlstat a
    JOIN dba_hist_snapshot b
    ON a.snap_id = b.snap_id
    WHERE sql_id        = '8acg09uq48jzk'
    AND executions_delta>0
    GROUP BY trunc(begin_interval_time, 'DD')
    ORDER by trunc(begin_interval_time, 'DD') DESC;
  
  
  TRUNC(BEG Total Execution Time (sec) Total Execution
  --------- -------------------------- ---------------
  01-AUG-14                        160          122078
  31-JUL-14                       9309         1822147
  30-JUL-14                       6667         1845014
  29-JUL-14                       6196         1873091
  28-JUL-14                     277268         1517005
  27-JUL-14                      78546          794048
  26-JUL-14                       1359         1166650
  25-JUL-14                       7665         1826915
  24-JUL-14                       6786         1907862
  23-JUL-14                       8132         2019695
  22-JUL-14                       6611         1948861
  
  
  TRUNC(BEG Total Execution Time (sec) Total Execution
  --------- -------------------------- ---------------
  21-JUL-14                       7980         2948449
  20-JUL-14                       3226         3554316
  19-JUL-14                       3405         3222148
  18-JUL-14                      10179         2478602
  17-JUL-14                       7950         1972643
  16-JUL-14                       8465         2054012
  15-JUL-14                       8483         2248688
  14-JUL-14                       8644         2243460
  13-JUL-14                        942         1478516
  12-JUL-14                        985         1075398
  
  
  

  Generate AWR report during the period of interest and you will get more information.

  Apart from that, what problem you ar trying to solve. Please explain that

  You can also use the following, because you are looking for particular sql

  awrsqrpt. SQL > for individual ssql

  awrsqrpti. SQL > for sql on a particular instance... (useful in case of CARS)

  Kind regards

  Harman

• How to speed up rendering time on ADOBE premiere pro cc?

  I go to adode first pro to adobe first pro CC and now render time got more slowly, since a render time of 30 min (adobe PR) 2: rendering time (Adobe PR CC) what to do?

  You have ALSO improved last month, to Win10. Which could contribute to the issue of speed too.

  To speed up the rendering, get a faster processor with more cores and more clock speed, get more memory (up to 32 GB), change the AMD video card for a videocard of nVidia GTX 9xx and only use SSDS.

• How to speed up my computer/rendering time?

  Hi all

  I just upgraded most of my computer. After the reinstallation of the Creative Suite 5.5, I noticed it seems to run faster than my old computer and render times are exactly the same (I also run the Suite of Red Giant MB in first/After Effects).

  Wise PC, it's my old set up: -.

  Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 processor

  ASUS P5Q PRO P45 Motherboard

  2 x 4 GB Kingston DDR2 1066 MHz memory (2x2gb)

  ASUS GeForce GTX 550 DirectCU Ti - 1 GB GDDR5 graphics card

  2 x Western Digital VelociRaptor 300 GB hard drive SATAII Hard Drives

  MOTU 828mk2 Firewire Audio 8in8out Unit

  PSU Corsair CMPSU-850AXUK 850W

  Pioneer BDR-205 / 12 x internal SATA Blu - Ray BD - RE drive

  This is my new set up: -.

  Intel Core i7 3930 K 3.20 GHz processor Socket 2011 12 M
  Card mother Asus SABERTOOTH X 79 Socket 2011
  Corsair 32 GB memory DDR3 1600 MHz Dominator
  ASUS GeForce GTX 550 DirectCU Ti - 1 GB GDDR5 graphics card
  2 x OCZ 512 GB agility 4 Solid State Drives
  2 x Western Digital VelociRaptor 300 GB hard drive SATAII hard disks (Raid mirror Backup)

  MOTU 828mk2 Firewire Audio 8in8out Unit

  PSU Corsair CMPSU-850AXUK 850W

  Pioneer BDR-205 / 12 x internal SATA Blu - Ray BD - RE drive

  I will soon buy a (if available for a PC) Quadro 4000, but I have to wait for what this means also to replace my monitors because they are VGA (with a connected via digital port).

  Is there a reason why he does not just more quickly, and is there settings you can recommend for me to do, especially for the rendering time?

  Thanks in advance :-)
  

  
  

  
  

  If you are Darren, (hard to tell with these pseudonyms), your results have already been included. If not, send me a PM where I can reach you.

• AE CS4, plugin Keylight, rendering time and specification of the machine

  I do a show which takes 15-20 minutes.  We use a wall of chroma chroma (green) and various images and graphics in the background.  It's a show of several camera.

  The chroma chroma Keylight for AE plugin is amazing. The finished file looked very good, but it really took a lot of time to render.  More than 25 minutes for a test of a minute sequence.  If I had to make it 15-20 minutes, it could take all day.  Is this normal for these long there rendered moments on clips matched with this plugin?

  My machine is an older machine.  Win XP SP3, HP/compaq dc7600, Duo core, both 3.4 GHz, 3 GB of RAM.  If I had to update this machine, which would be optimal for the shortest rendering time?

  I found a quantity of decent info on how to use the plugin, but not big thing on recommended card machine or times normal.  Where can I find more information on the card of what machine are needed to take full advantage of tools and plugins of EI?

  Thank you

  Anthony Roberts

  JournalStar.com

  MMH, Yes, it's still ambiguous to advise on the matter. For your business a Core2Duo should be just fine. Just make sure it is later a (8600 E currently). I wouldn't bother with a Core2Quad in your situation - if there is no hope of improvement, what be soon, it's a bit pointless to invest in a more expensive processor and motherboard. Given the fast-paced development cycles, you buy a computer for the next 2 or 3 years and already in a few months to not consider any worthy material updates. At best, so I'd go for a new AMD Phenom II X 4 because it's much cheaper while offering better performance (current quads of intel are a little behind). Yet, would be exaggerated, especially if we consider that "crunchy" all can be more important for you, to get fast feedback while you work more predictable rendering times. The performance by heart is less about quad systems, they burn only if you use the hearts of all time, that your proposed combination would not. AE and many plug-ins don't are not especially optimized in terms of multithreading and if you use the option to make several images at the same time would compensate, is another matter. Definitely get these 8 GB of RAM and Vista 64 Business or Ultimate, so you can max on the memory of EI usage and are on the right side, when future versions are going to 64-bit. For the graphics card, settle on a GeForce normal 275 / 285, not a multi-GPU as 295 card. With regard to the suggestions of the brand - Dell and HP are trustworthy, but not the cheapest. I could recommend other brands are specific to the Germany / Europe, so he can't help you. also, if you know a good computer guy, think about him having to build a custom machine. This will shave a little money here and there, because you can order the individual components of those who sell at the lowest price. I went like that with my Core7i and was thus able to save almost 500 Euros compared to these sellers of stock...

  Mylenium

• How to select and move more than one bookmark at a time? Shift + click selects multiple items that are next to each other in a list, because the element

  How to select and move more than one bookmark at a time?
  Shift + click selects multiple items that are next to each other in a list, because the items open in firefox before that happens.

  Glad it worked for you. Thanks for posting back.

• Dell workstation T 5810 with Intel® Xeon® Processor-E5-1650 v3 (HT 6 c, 15 MB Memory Cache, 3.5 GHz Turbo) NVIDIA® Quadro® K4200 4 GB will reduce the rendering time Ae/PR?

  Dell T 5810 workstation with Intel® Xeon® Processor-E5-1650 v3 (HT 6 c, 15 MB Memory Cache, 3.5 GHz Turbo) Windows 7 Professional operating system 32 G 2133 MHz DDR4 RDIMMS (4X8Go) ECC memory 256 GB 2.5 inch SATA Solid State Drive NVIDIA® Quadro® K4200 4 GB video card This will reduce the render in Ae/Pr SC 6 times . It is the second highest available from DELL workstation. Or back of card GTX better? http://www.Dell.com/in/business/p/precision-t5810-workstation/PD?OC=cap013x650821in8 & Model _id = precision-t5810-station work Should I buy this or not?

  Well, if you get the Xeon V3 they are locked to 2133 DDR4 ram. The 5960 X and other chips I7 Haswell E will load any DDR4 speed and are not locked. So you can get the amount of fast ram with the I7 CPU. ECC adds an extra clock for the ECC cycle which is a marginal increase in latency ram. However, the difference between DDR4-2133 and DDR4 2666 is big enough, especially when it comes with 4 +, media. That's why you want unbuffered ram, but need you an I7 using it at a higher speed, 2133. Also there is at least some Xeon boards that used same handle without buffer ram, so maybe it's not an option on this Dell anyway. You certainly want the Quadro K4200 of pit and get a 980GTX card. The Quadros are slower and do not have HDMi 2.0. They generate more heat at this point than the 900 series cards. I would like to ask what PSU is that Dell however since this is a major limitation of upgrade of video and other cards if it is small.

  Eric

  ADK

• Adobe Media Encoder CC 2015 slow rendering time

  Hello!

  I'm new to video editing in general, but I'm quite intimate with the PC hardware so here.

  Specifications:

  • The stock of 4770K i7, no thermal regulation speed
  • 8 GB 1600 MHz CL9 DDR3 RAM
  • GTX 780 + 170 MHz clock and 110% limit/95 degrees C temp power target
  • Driver 368.39 used
  • 3 x Samsung 840 EVO (no raid)
    • Windows 10 64-bit running off SSD1
      • PE/AE/SOUL installed on this drive
      • Cache / Scratch areas on this drive
      • Images under development
    • SSD 2
      • Games
    • SSD3
      • Games

  I save images using shadowplay NVIDIA from a 75 Hz screen 2560 x 1080. The output file is a 1920 x 1080 60 fps 35Mbps bitrate H.264 MP4 file. (1920 x 810 with black bars).

  I would add that sequences Adobe Premiere elements 14, do any editing that I have to do, and then export it to a file of bitrate MP4 1080 p H.264 12Mbps. The rendering process usually take around 10-12 minutes to 6 minutes video.

  I then add this file to output in Adobe After effects CC 2015, create a composition with drag and create a button, add a few layers of text and export it via Adobe Media Encoder CC 2015 (AE supports native H.264 from what I understand) with the SAME PARAMETERS. But this time, and I estimate that I type here, render times are 40 minutes.

  I ran a few tests and in the course of the first to make the CPU turns to about 80% CPU and the use of 1.8 to 2 GB, as I watch often some youtube in the meantime, so that understandeably not 100%. However, to the course to make AE/SOUL, le CPU CPU remains at about 30% CPU and 1.8 GB ram usage. With the help of the Mercury Playback Engine GPU Acceleration (CUDA) I expect to see more high on my GTX 780 loads, but he is 2-3% of load, so anything.

  Since my render outputs are (to the best of my knowledge) identical between the EP and shall return AE/SOUL, it seems that the use of material by SOUL is in this case. Other posters have suggested that some effects require the previous frame to be returned to pass, but I have not used such effects, are limited to simple text.

  So what's happening? I would appreciate any insight you have on this and I stand ready to provide more information that you need.

  Kind regards

  Corentin Robin wrote:

  First of all, wow. Thank you so much for the depth and quality of your response! If everyone had that kind of mentality, forums would be a very different place...

  No problem! That's why I'm here.

  It is certainly useful that you said your question clearly, with a lot of info and he asked respectfully. Quantity of, "why his does not work u should help me solve this NAOW! 1. 1. ' messages with no information is astounding.

  Corentin Robin wrote:

  I'll try to be to condense my game data on a single disk or both and use the third exclusively for editing. Or I could buy a new one, if the budget allows.

  This would be ideal. In my freelance studio, I have three separate units

  1. OS/software
  2. Footage
  3. Cache (if there are different types of player, it should be faster than you [I know your are currently all the same, it's more for future fans forum])

  It will probably not help much for the rendering speed, but it should help when you're interacting.

  Corentin Robin wrote:

  Before moving on to something else, I want to explain what I'm doing with text. I add text and overlay video, with sometimes a few very basic motion tracking (I can't forget this feature if I need). To the best of my knowledge, PE lets just add a black screen with text over time, like on a Blackboard for example. No text overlays/over-the-video (if it has no meaning...). So respect that, Premiere Pro have these features? If so I could make the switch.

  Certainly, you should stop using the Premiere Elements and start using Premiere Pro. Not only it gives MUCH more flexibility in the work, but you can layer objects of type as much as you want on top of your film.

  He was also transparent enough with AE. By example, if you have a shot that you want to add text, you could cut the part that would have text and simply right-click and choose "replace with After Effects composition. That images will be replaced with a dynamic link to a model of EI that already contains the images that you are handling. You save your AE project and results will be displayed immediately on the first! It's really convenient. If you want to keep this direct link, you can. Or if you are sure you are finished with AE work and wants to read smoothly at first, you can choose to make and replace it. It restores an intermediate file to AE and replaces the model tied first with her. VERY useful feature.

  If you keep track of movement, you probably want to use AE. Although you can make an animation in Premiere Pro, AE is much more suited to do. And if you start to get really fancy, you probably want to do some rotoscoping too.

  Corentin Robin wrote:

  I understand that EI requires much more accurately, and the way you explained it enabled me to understand one of the big question I had with her, which was "why reading in real time is so difficult in AE? You answered that perfectly, cheers!

  There is much more detail in the fact that I could get! Basically, AE must first build a cache, and then he reads. Maybe I should have said that. It is even simpler and shorter!

  Corentin Robin wrote:

  On the issue of compression, I realized that the work of a compressed codec is not ideal. My gross output of Shadowplay file was indeed H.264 because I believe that is the single output file, it allows. I don't think I can do without shadowplay for now because it has unique characteristics which cannot be replaced:

  • For extremely low hardware with Nvidia drivers
  • Ability to retroactively save a video after an interesting "keep-worthy" event, to avoid recording 24/7 in the hope of something interesting

  Those who do not sound like some very useful features. Just make sure that you get quality settings in the codec to achieve a data rate as it allows.

  Corentin Robin wrote:

  Also, to continue on the issue of compression, I got mixed responses regarding this. Some, like you, would say that working with H.264 sacrifices quality and performance, but some say that it is not a problem since the youtube compression will be severely disfigue the file in any case.

  YouTube can recompress, Yes. But if so, it adds ANOTHER layer of compression. That would be an argument even more important to preserve the quality of your side as much as possible.

  Corentin Robin wrote:

  I think my question would be: I would win a much higher quality using Fraps/Dxtory where I can control the settings of the raw images (keeping in mind I lose the comfort of ShadowPlay) even though the compression of Youtube should (I think?) disfigure this film?

  I think that the benefits of ShadowPlay outweigh the concerns that I had about compression in only one step. I still say don't do any other steps in making H.264s again and again that you transmit your project between applications. If you need to make something (you won't have to if you start to use together the Premiere Pro and AE), renders an intermediate codec until you create your deliverable.

  Corentin Robin wrote:

  So, keeping in mind of all of your suggestions and the constraints I have / has chosen to conform to, I should:

  • Have the work files on a separate disk, with areas scratch on this drive or free
  • Replace PE PP to eliminate the need for the AE and have only a single record
  • Since a single rendition is necessary, it is therefore more a real need for an intermediate codec low compression/lossless

  Yes. Although, you can still use AE, you have eliminated the need to make the intermediate files if you use Premiere Pro and AE set.

  In addition the Dynamic Link workflow I mentioned, you can also (once you have finished your editing in Premiere Pro), your Premiere Pro project import into AE. Use import > import Premiere Pro control project. She puts your complete sequence in AE with each cut on its own layer. You really need to do if you started to do really complex with your AE work if.

• A 2nd hard drive would help with my rendering time?

  This week, I upgraded my system (comparison between specifications old and new specifications below).  The old system had made a long time and reading when editing has been very hectic 8 Camtasia and Premiere Pro CS6.  The new system is MUCH better than the old system in most regions (make time 2 - 3 times faster in Camtasia and first), but while editing in first video playback is still not as smooth as I like it (although even better than before).

  I bought a WD Black WD1002FAEX - disk hard-1 TB - SATA-600 of CDW (on recommendation from another forum I posted) but do not want to install it if I won't get it a significant improvement in the time of rendering and playback quality when editing. (it was $ 100 in my pocket that I would get back if I do not use)

  Since I am new in this area, I expect some comments from those who are much more familiar with this sort of thing.

  Thank you!

  Andrew

  New system

  HP Elite 8000 Convertible minitower

  I7-3770

  16 GB ram w / dual channel memory configuration

  Quadro 2000 d

  1 TB Seagate Barracuda 7200 RPM SATA 6.0 GB hard drive

  Old system

  HP Elite 4000 Pro small form factor

  Intel Dual Core

  configuration of memory-8 GB ram

  NVS 300

  500 GB hard drive (not sure of the brand/model)

  I can't tell you the performance increase you get from the addition of a single disc, but it will be considerable.

  If I export a timeline easy to DV AVI on disk on my system, 3-hour timeline will take about 20-21 seconds to export and to write on the disc, near 37 GB in total, which translates into about 1 800 MB / s. A single disc can reach 150 MB/s if it is dedicated to this task, but even in this case the same export would take 250 seconds. If this single disc is hampered by the traffic lights, as in my analogy, the second 250 could well turn into 300 + seconds. The comparison is not really honest, since I compare 1 single drive dedicated to a 21 (+ 3) matrix of disks, but it displays it sustained transfer rates to have a huge impact on the performance of the disk.

  Involving your manager and to what extent depends on the user restrictions, he asked to your profile. I don't have any idea from here, but I've certainly it would ask you give full administrative rights to your system. It will be much easier editing, avoid all kinds of errors that are common with limited user access rights and thus to facilitate both of your lives. He doesn't have to go out with every problem you have.

• Time Capsule reducing Hardwired speed

  I have a gigabit ethernet connection and became speeds as last year.

  I recently noticed things were slow.  I'm not to lift more than 90 and 90 below.  I called my service provider who contacted the society of fiber and they claimed that I have a device that is connected that can not handle the gigabit connection.  I the end 2014 27 "iMac and the latest version of time capsule (updated to 7.7.3) so I know that they're wrong.  In addition, I received rates preceding earlier.  They had me connect my modem directly on the computer and of course I got new speeds.  Running the wired connection through the router, it seems that my time capsule limits my speed.  I Googled it and can't find anything.  Help!

  It is useful to know if the Capsule acts as a router DHCP and NAT for your network, or if your "modem" will carry the router for the network and the time Capsule is configured in Bridge Mode.

  We assume that you have checked to make sure that the Ethernet cable is not in place and reducing speeds... because a bad connection will pass a Mbps 1 000 potential up to approximately 100 Mbps speeds.

  We also assume that you have turned off and restarted several times Time Capsule.

  Can you check the setting of your Time Capsule router Mode and a report on that?  To do this...

  Open the AirPort on your Mac utility (Finder > Applications > utilities > AirPort Utility )

  Click on the image of the Time Capsule

  Click Edit in the window that appears

  Click on the network at the top of the screen

  Report on the current value for the router Mode