Similar Questions

• SpeedGrade very slow on the GPU acceleration

  My system has a nvidia gtx 590.

  I have run triple monitors so I need two GPU (590 is an FYI double card)

  When you run speedgrade in GPU acceleration even at 1/4 ground video is maybe 10-12 fps

  the software only reads it in real-time to the ground full...

  I guess that's a multiple GPU issue?

  a way to solve this problem?

  I seem to have solved this... will post for those who seek in the future...

  I used speedgrade mode dual monitor

  the display of the desktop interface was on GPU 2 while the secondary output was on 1 GPU... speedgrade didn't like that

  When I went to the office and secondary to GPU 1... everything worked fine. Can now read the full ground on the gpu acceleration

• Adobe Media Encoder CC 2015 slow rendering time

  Hello!

  I'm new to video editing in general, but I'm quite intimate with the PC hardware so here.

  Specifications:

  • The stock of 4770K i7, no thermal regulation speed
  • 8 GB 1600 MHz CL9 DDR3 RAM
  • GTX 780 + 170 MHz clock and 110% limit/95 degrees C temp power target
  • Driver 368.39 used
  • 3 x Samsung 840 EVO (no raid)
    • Windows 10 64-bit running off SSD1
      • PE/AE/SOUL installed on this drive
      • Cache / Scratch areas on this drive
      • Images under development
    • SSD 2
      • Games
    • SSD3
      • Games

  I save images using shadowplay NVIDIA from a 75 Hz screen 2560 x 1080. The output file is a 1920 x 1080 60 fps 35Mbps bitrate H.264 MP4 file. (1920 x 810 with black bars).

  I would add that sequences Adobe Premiere elements 14, do any editing that I have to do, and then export it to a file of bitrate MP4 1080 p H.264 12Mbps. The rendering process usually take around 10-12 minutes to 6 minutes video.

  I then add this file to output in Adobe After effects CC 2015, create a composition with drag and create a button, add a few layers of text and export it via Adobe Media Encoder CC 2015 (AE supports native H.264 from what I understand) with the SAME PARAMETERS. But this time, and I estimate that I type here, render times are 40 minutes.

  I ran a few tests and in the course of the first to make the CPU turns to about 80% CPU and the use of 1.8 to 2 GB, as I watch often some youtube in the meantime, so that understandeably not 100%. However, to the course to make AE/SOUL, le CPU CPU remains at about 30% CPU and 1.8 GB ram usage. With the help of the Mercury Playback Engine GPU Acceleration (CUDA) I expect to see more high on my GTX 780 loads, but he is 2-3% of load, so anything.

  Since my render outputs are (to the best of my knowledge) identical between the EP and shall return AE/SOUL, it seems that the use of material by SOUL is in this case. Other posters have suggested that some effects require the previous frame to be returned to pass, but I have not used such effects, are limited to simple text.

  So what's happening? I would appreciate any insight you have on this and I stand ready to provide more information that you need.

  Kind regards

  Corentin Robin wrote:

  First of all, wow. Thank you so much for the depth and quality of your response! If everyone had that kind of mentality, forums would be a very different place...

  No problem! That's why I'm here.

  It is certainly useful that you said your question clearly, with a lot of info and he asked respectfully. Quantity of, "why his does not work u should help me solve this NAOW! 1. 1. ' messages with no information is astounding.

  Corentin Robin wrote:

  I'll try to be to condense my game data on a single disk or both and use the third exclusively for editing. Or I could buy a new one, if the budget allows.

  This would be ideal. In my freelance studio, I have three separate units

  1. OS/software
  2. Footage
  3. Cache (if there are different types of player, it should be faster than you [I know your are currently all the same, it's more for future fans forum])

  It will probably not help much for the rendering speed, but it should help when you're interacting.

  Corentin Robin wrote:

  Before moving on to something else, I want to explain what I'm doing with text. I add text and overlay video, with sometimes a few very basic motion tracking (I can't forget this feature if I need). To the best of my knowledge, PE lets just add a black screen with text over time, like on a Blackboard for example. No text overlays/over-the-video (if it has no meaning...). So respect that, Premiere Pro have these features? If so I could make the switch.

  Certainly, you should stop using the Premiere Elements and start using Premiere Pro. Not only it gives MUCH more flexibility in the work, but you can layer objects of type as much as you want on top of your film.

  He was also transparent enough with AE. By example, if you have a shot that you want to add text, you could cut the part that would have text and simply right-click and choose "replace with After Effects composition. That images will be replaced with a dynamic link to a model of EI that already contains the images that you are handling. You save your AE project and results will be displayed immediately on the first! It's really convenient. If you want to keep this direct link, you can. Or if you are sure you are finished with AE work and wants to read smoothly at first, you can choose to make and replace it. It restores an intermediate file to AE and replaces the model tied first with her. VERY useful feature.

  If you keep track of movement, you probably want to use AE. Although you can make an animation in Premiere Pro, AE is much more suited to do. And if you start to get really fancy, you probably want to do some rotoscoping too.

  Corentin Robin wrote:

  I understand that EI requires much more accurately, and the way you explained it enabled me to understand one of the big question I had with her, which was "why reading in real time is so difficult in AE? You answered that perfectly, cheers!

  There is much more detail in the fact that I could get! Basically, AE must first build a cache, and then he reads. Maybe I should have said that. It is even simpler and shorter!

  Corentin Robin wrote:

  On the issue of compression, I realized that the work of a compressed codec is not ideal. My gross output of Shadowplay file was indeed H.264 because I believe that is the single output file, it allows. I don't think I can do without shadowplay for now because it has unique characteristics which cannot be replaced:

  • For extremely low hardware with Nvidia drivers
  • Ability to retroactively save a video after an interesting "keep-worthy" event, to avoid recording 24/7 in the hope of something interesting

  Those who do not sound like some very useful features. Just make sure that you get quality settings in the codec to achieve a data rate as it allows.

  Corentin Robin wrote:

  Also, to continue on the issue of compression, I got mixed responses regarding this. Some, like you, would say that working with H.264 sacrifices quality and performance, but some say that it is not a problem since the youtube compression will be severely disfigue the file in any case.

  YouTube can recompress, Yes. But if so, it adds ANOTHER layer of compression. That would be an argument even more important to preserve the quality of your side as much as possible.

  Corentin Robin wrote:

  I think my question would be: I would win a much higher quality using Fraps/Dxtory where I can control the settings of the raw images (keeping in mind I lose the comfort of ShadowPlay) even though the compression of Youtube should (I think?) disfigure this film?

  I think that the benefits of ShadowPlay outweigh the concerns that I had about compression in only one step. I still say don't do any other steps in making H.264s again and again that you transmit your project between applications. If you need to make something (you won't have to if you start to use together the Premiere Pro and AE), renders an intermediate codec until you create your deliverable.

  Corentin Robin wrote:

  So, keeping in mind of all of your suggestions and the constraints I have / has chosen to conform to, I should:

  • Have the work files on a separate disk, with areas scratch on this drive or free
  • Replace PE PP to eliminate the need for the AE and have only a single record
  • Since a single rendition is necessary, it is therefore more a real need for an intermediate codec low compression/lossless

  Yes. Although, you can still use AE, you have eliminated the need to make the intermediate files if you use Premiere Pro and AE set.

  In addition the Dynamic Link workflow I mentioned, you can also (once you have finished your editing in Premiere Pro), your Premiere Pro project import into AE. Use import > import Premiere Pro control project. She puts your complete sequence in AE with each cut on its own layer. You really need to do if you started to do really complex with your AE work if.

• Total rendering time is reduced by cutting of items?

  Know that I can run experiments to answer this question, but also know that a number of people here have already responded to this.  Scanned the FAQ and done research, but never found an answer to this specific question.   I think it is safe to say that stability can be achieved by dividing a long clip, for example one an hour.  But it is total time reduced rendering?

  Take a 1 h project as our example: If you return the full 1 hour it will take X amount of time. If divide you it in half and make no other changes, your time will be X / 2 for each. X / 2 x 2 is always equal to X, or so close as to not make any real difference. You'll spend more time opening upward both halves and hit Render, that you want to save. Now, as the rendering time is dependent on CPU, there could be a slight advantage (more efficient use of a CPU) to do it in segments. As my QuadCore never maxes, I doubt I could tell the difference except with a stopwatch - clock on the wall is probably not specific enough. If I'm on my dual Quad machine, I'm not even sure that a mechanical stopwatch show. If you have a slower processor, things could be different enough, as County, but still not it.

  It looks like to use pure vs RAM virtual memory in Windows, on a fast machine. Yes, there is a difference in speed, but a human being would be hard-pressed to really make a difference. Enter the virtual memory on a slow machine with very slow I/o and then you will really see the difference.

  Overall workability likely to improve with the project split. There you will probably see a speed difference and also power change crashes more comfortably with less of a concern to the wire. Rendering time, however, will not be enough difference for a SIP of coffee, once you add the pieces to be rendered.

  Hunt

• A 2nd hard drive would help with my rendering time?

  This week, I upgraded my system (comparison between specifications old and new specifications below).  The old system had made a long time and reading when editing has been very hectic 8 Camtasia and Premiere Pro CS6.  The new system is MUCH better than the old system in most regions (make time 2 - 3 times faster in Camtasia and first), but while editing in first video playback is still not as smooth as I like it (although even better than before).

  I bought a WD Black WD1002FAEX - disk hard-1 TB - SATA-600 of CDW (on recommendation from another forum I posted) but do not want to install it if I won't get it a significant improvement in the time of rendering and playback quality when editing. (it was $ 100 in my pocket that I would get back if I do not use)

  Since I am new in this area, I expect some comments from those who are much more familiar with this sort of thing.

  Thank you!

  Andrew

  New system

  HP Elite 8000 Convertible minitower

  I7-3770

  16 GB ram w / dual channel memory configuration

  Quadro 2000 d

  1 TB Seagate Barracuda 7200 RPM SATA 6.0 GB hard drive

  Old system

  HP Elite 4000 Pro small form factor

  Intel Dual Core

  configuration of memory-8 GB ram

  NVS 300

  500 GB hard drive (not sure of the brand/model)

  I can't tell you the performance increase you get from the addition of a single disc, but it will be considerable.

  If I export a timeline easy to DV AVI on disk on my system, 3-hour timeline will take about 20-21 seconds to export and to write on the disc, near 37 GB in total, which translates into about 1 800 MB / s. A single disc can reach 150 MB/s if it is dedicated to this task, but even in this case the same export would take 250 seconds. If this single disc is hampered by the traffic lights, as in my analogy, the second 250 could well turn into 300 + seconds. The comparison is not really honest, since I compare 1 single drive dedicated to a 21 (+ 3) matrix of disks, but it displays it sustained transfer rates to have a huge impact on the performance of the disk.

  Involving your manager and to what extent depends on the user restrictions, he asked to your profile. I don't have any idea from here, but I've certainly it would ask you give full administrative rights to your system. It will be much easier editing, avoid all kinds of errors that are common with limited user access rights and thus to facilitate both of your lives. He doesn't have to go out with every problem you have.

• Backups Time Machine very slow on 2015 MacBook Air

  Associated with a topic of discussion between a few days ago (two MacBooks, 10.11.4, a fast Time Machine backup and a very slow), I start a new topic with new information that seem to show it is a problem more general and not related to Time Machine networks.

  Here's the situation:

  • A 2015 MacBook Air, 10.11.4, 8 GB / 512 GB, has extremely slow performance of backup Time Machine, taking 40 hours for the first 300 GB backup and incremental backups for a long time as well
  • TM performance is essentially the same whether on the network (wired Ethernet) or a USB3 external disk
  • When you back up to disk USB3, I confirmed that the information system shows that the port is configured as USB3, not USB2 (nothing else is plugged into the USB port)
  • Tests of bandwidth I/O gross (using dd and iperf) show no problem; the network reached 110 MB/s bandwidth, written network managed at 50 Mbps, external USB3 HD written work at 40-50 MB/s (write hard drive speed limit)
  • 3 other Macs of various ages from 2009-2014 on the same network have no problem at all do backups Time Machine Network; a backup complete first on a 2011 MacBook Pro 500 GB takes 5 hours or more than 10 x faster than the MBA problem
  • Time machine network uses a Linux server running the latest Debian and Netatalk 3.1.8 and the connection is via a USB3/Gigabit adapter, no WiFi, and iperf tests with this arrangement shows 900 MB/s of throughput of the server.  In all cases, the Time Machine and external time Machine Network USB HD have the same symptoms.
  • The problem with MacBook Air is configured the same as the MacBook Pro 2011, which she replaced "daily driver", possible
  • This problem was shown by the MBA since his unboxing conversion, taking 20 hours for his first backup once Setup initially.  Incremental backups now take several hours, leading to interrupted incremental backups and, I believe, databases corrupted backup triggers new full backups that take today the 40 hours.

  Using Terminal Server and iostat, Console, etc, I see that there is significant activity e/s for the backup drive on the order of 20 to 40 MB/s for long periods on the MBA during the TM backup, but during that time the average declared backup size as shown in the window in the console and TM is growing by only 5 GB/hour.  This occur even if the backup will the external drive or a network drive. This seems to mean that the I/O bandwidth to and from the disk hard external, only 1/600 contributes to the progress of the backup.  I am sure that there is overload of certain checks and other tasks, but not to a 600-to-1 ratio.

  I tried to disable the limitation of the I/O of low priority as shown here: http://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/212537/time-machine-ridiculously-slow-a close-el-capitan-upgrade, that helps a bit (maybe 20-30%), but not by a factor of 10 for others.

  I have gone through a number of the Time Machine of Pondini troubleshooting steps, but he found nothing corresponding to these symptoms.

  The only thing I can conclude is that Time Machine, the application or configuration, on this specific MBA, is down. (A single thought that I wrote this to the top that I have not tried: the MBA and the time MBP running VMware Fusion and have a file of 50 + GB VM; on the MBA that is not excluded from TM backups while on the MBP is)

  Does anyone have advice on what to watch next?  In all cases, only one key would be why it seems that only 0.16% of all the bandwidth I/O to the backup drive seems to be actual data backup.

  Once again, three other Macs, all running the same 10.11.4, back to the Time Machine Server perfectly and have for years.  Only this new MBA glue as broken out, either to a network drive or an external hard drive USB3.

  (A single thought that I wrote this to the top that I have not tried: the MBA and the time MBP running VMware Fusion and have a file of 50 + GB VM; on the MBA that is not excluded from TM backups while on the MBP is)

  What happens when you exclude it as the MBP?

• How to speed up rendering time on ADOBE premiere pro cc?

  I go to adode first pro to adobe first pro CC and now render time got more slowly, since a render time of 30 min (adobe PR) 2: rendering time (Adobe PR CC) what to do?

  You have ALSO improved last month, to Win10. Which could contribute to the issue of speed too.

  To speed up the rendering, get a faster processor with more cores and more clock speed, get more memory (up to 32 GB), change the AMD video card for a videocard of nVidia GTX 9xx and only use SSDS.

• How to speed up my computer/rendering time?

  Hi all

  I just upgraded most of my computer. After the reinstallation of the Creative Suite 5.5, I noticed it seems to run faster than my old computer and render times are exactly the same (I also run the Suite of Red Giant MB in first/After Effects).

  Wise PC, it's my old set up: -.

  Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 processor

  ASUS P5Q PRO P45 Motherboard

  2 x 4 GB Kingston DDR2 1066 MHz memory (2x2gb)

  ASUS GeForce GTX 550 DirectCU Ti - 1 GB GDDR5 graphics card

  2 x Western Digital VelociRaptor 300 GB hard drive SATAII Hard Drives

  MOTU 828mk2 Firewire Audio 8in8out Unit

  PSU Corsair CMPSU-850AXUK 850W

  Pioneer BDR-205 / 12 x internal SATA Blu - Ray BD - RE drive

  This is my new set up: -.

  Intel Core i7 3930 K 3.20 GHz processor Socket 2011 12 M
  Card mother Asus SABERTOOTH X 79 Socket 2011
  Corsair 32 GB memory DDR3 1600 MHz Dominator
  ASUS GeForce GTX 550 DirectCU Ti - 1 GB GDDR5 graphics card
  2 x OCZ 512 GB agility 4 Solid State Drives
  2 x Western Digital VelociRaptor 300 GB hard drive SATAII hard disks (Raid mirror Backup)

  MOTU 828mk2 Firewire Audio 8in8out Unit

  PSU Corsair CMPSU-850AXUK 850W

  Pioneer BDR-205 / 12 x internal SATA Blu - Ray BD - RE drive

  I will soon buy a (if available for a PC) Quadro 4000, but I have to wait for what this means also to replace my monitors because they are VGA (with a connected via digital port).

  Is there a reason why he does not just more quickly, and is there settings you can recommend for me to do, especially for the rendering time?

  Thanks in advance :-)
  

  
  

  
  

  If you are Darren, (hard to tell with these pseudonyms), your results have already been included. If not, send me a PM where I can reach you.

• AE CS4, plugin Keylight, rendering time and specification of the machine

  I do a show which takes 15-20 minutes.  We use a wall of chroma chroma (green) and various images and graphics in the background.  It's a show of several camera.

  The chroma chroma Keylight for AE plugin is amazing. The finished file looked very good, but it really took a lot of time to render.  More than 25 minutes for a test of a minute sequence.  If I had to make it 15-20 minutes, it could take all day.  Is this normal for these long there rendered moments on clips matched with this plugin?

  My machine is an older machine.  Win XP SP3, HP/compaq dc7600, Duo core, both 3.4 GHz, 3 GB of RAM.  If I had to update this machine, which would be optimal for the shortest rendering time?

  I found a quantity of decent info on how to use the plugin, but not big thing on recommended card machine or times normal.  Where can I find more information on the card of what machine are needed to take full advantage of tools and plugins of EI?

  Thank you

  Anthony Roberts

  JournalStar.com

  MMH, Yes, it's still ambiguous to advise on the matter. For your business a Core2Duo should be just fine. Just make sure it is later a (8600 E currently). I wouldn't bother with a Core2Quad in your situation - if there is no hope of improvement, what be soon, it's a bit pointless to invest in a more expensive processor and motherboard. Given the fast-paced development cycles, you buy a computer for the next 2 or 3 years and already in a few months to not consider any worthy material updates. At best, so I'd go for a new AMD Phenom II X 4 because it's much cheaper while offering better performance (current quads of intel are a little behind). Yet, would be exaggerated, especially if we consider that "crunchy" all can be more important for you, to get fast feedback while you work more predictable rendering times. The performance by heart is less about quad systems, they burn only if you use the hearts of all time, that your proposed combination would not. AE and many plug-ins don't are not especially optimized in terms of multithreading and if you use the option to make several images at the same time would compensate, is another matter. Definitely get these 8 GB of RAM and Vista 64 Business or Ultimate, so you can max on the memory of EI usage and are on the right side, when future versions are going to 64-bit. For the graphics card, settle on a GeForce normal 275 / 285, not a multi-GPU as 295 card. With regard to the suggestions of the brand - Dell and HP are trustworthy, but not the cheapest. I could recommend other brands are specific to the Germany / Europe, so he can't help you. also, if you know a good computer guy, think about him having to build a custom machine. This will shave a little money here and there, because you can order the individual components of those who sell at the lowest price. I went like that with my Core7i and was thus able to save almost 500 Euros compared to these sellers of stock...

  Mylenium

• Cannot scroll to delete several email messages-just one at a time and very slow-help?

  MacBook

  10.10.5 Yosemite

  Can not hold the command to scroll down and delete send several messages, just one at a time and VERY slow-help?

  If the emails are side by side, select one, then hold down the SHIFT key and select the last one. Hold the command key and clicking on the individual emails should work. What happens when you try?

• BlackBerry 10 Z10 battery drains 2 times faster after OS upgraded to 10.2.1.3062 10 Nov/14 software version

  Z10 battery drains 2 times faster after OS upgraded to 10.2.1.3062 10 Nov/14 software version (OS version is now at 3442). I use to charge my phone once every 4 days, but now I need to load every 2 days.

  I use no Bluetooth, no WIFI, have no applications running, no text and no phone call. Emails only 2 or 3 per day. Display says battery system 22% use, standby 7%, PIM 3%, home of screen display of 2%, 1%, and the rest are less then. 1%. I need to know what service or feature that turned on the update of the software so that I can turn it off.

  I ran a few tests and one of them was to turn on my WiFi. This reduces the rate of use of battery significantly drain (I would have thought would have increased with WiFi on battery drain). After the execution of WiFi for a day I shut it off and my battery usage seems to be back to what I had before the upgrade of the OS. I rebooted on Sunday afternoon, it's now Tuesday night and I'm only up to 63% and the unit figures monitor I have 2 more days still to go. Yes, problem solved by running WiFi for a day. Go figure.

• I used even to make the Blurays for a long time, with success, with no problems. Today, on my current project (.iso file estimated size ~ 19 GB) MENUS rendering time is reported as 31 + Hrs. Is this OK, or is there a problem?

  My system: 2013 Mac Pro: Core, 64 GB of Ram, two GPU of D700 12 / 3GB. I was creating an ISO image file using ENCORE 6. I am currently using the latest ADOBE CC system.

  The menu on which rendering takes a while has three normal buttons linking to 3 first videos produced. The menu has a long file AUDIO (about 90 minutes) as an attachment.

  After letting the rendering process to continue for 4 hours, on the audit of the progress window, progress bars seemed not to be ahead. I waited 2 + hours of overtime and checked again. Progress bars have been in the same place (no deposit). Activity monitor showed that still was still running. At this point, I cancelled the task. Then, I wanted to just MAKE THE MENUS. It is currently running for the 95 + last minutes. Details 'Render' reported ~29.5+ hours as TIME REMAINING. The number of processed IMAGES currently shows ~ 27000 + showing as 169065 in total. The meter for executives of the ongoing transformation to increment of the above stated figure of snapshot of 27000.

  I think that maybe I should let it continue to operate at the end (i.e. 30 hours of rendering time, if all goes well). Is - this sound NORMAL?

  Any advice will be appreciated.

  Never tried such an audio file for a long time. Are you sure that there is no video movement in this menu?

  What format is the audio file?

• LR6 Module Development: is my GPU work properly? Color 'flash' and "Live Preview rendering Time" feels long.

  Hello

  I don't know why, but in the Module development in LR6, it feels like excerpts Live are not comparable to those of the speed I expected now with GPU acceleration.

  SEE THIS SCREENGRAB VIDEO: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5840419/lightroom6performance.mp4

  In this overview, pictures that I consult have been seen to all Standard size generated.

  Note: each photo is a Raw Nikon D800 and manipulations have been performed on it (as you can see in the video, many sliders have been used for the photo of grade).

  See what happens:

  -I click on the thumbnail of the photo

  -The large preview appears, slightly desaturated and "fuzzy".

  -a "Flash of Color" appears (the appropriate color saturation appears)

  -then a strong image (in short, as opposed to a soft extract)

  Overall, a process about 4 seconds each time.

  Is this normal?

  I don't understand why.

  And the GPU acceleration is enabled. GTX 670

  I have a descent system very:

  Operating system: Windows 8.1 Business Edition

  Version: 6.3 [9600]

  Application architecture: x 64

  System architecture: x 64

  Number of logical processors: 12

  Processor speed: 3.2 GHz

  Built-in memory: 32707,8 MB

  Real memory for Lightroom: 32707,8 MB

  Real memory used by Lightroom: 2284,0 MB (6.9%)

  Virtual memory used by Lightroom: 2351,0 MB

  Memory cache size: 699,3 MB

  Maximum thread count used by Camera Raw: 6

  Camera Raw SIMD optimization: SSE2, AVX

  System DPI setting: 96 DPI

  Composition of the Bureau enabled: Yes

  Exhibition: 1) 1600 x 1200, 2) 1280 x 1024

  Entry types: Multitouch: no, built-in touch: no, built-in pen: Yes, touch external: no, external pen: Yes, keyboard: No.

  Graphic processor News:

  GeForce GTX 670/PCIe/SSE2

  Check the supported OpenGL: past

  Provider: NVIDIA Corporation

  Version: 3.3.0 NVIDIA 350,12

  Rendering engine: GeForce GTX 670/PCIe/SSE2

  LanguageVersion: 3,30 NVIDIA via the Cg compiler

  Plugins installed:

  (1) Behance

  (2) substantive canon Plugin

  (3) Facebook

  (4) Flickr

  (5) HDR Efex Pro 2

  (6) home Plugin Leica

  (7) attachment Plugin Nikon

  Config.LUA flags: None

  Map #1: Seller: 10de

  Feature: 1189

  Subsystem: 35421458

  Revision: a1

  Video memory: 1987

  Map #2: Seller: 1414

  Device: 8 c

  Subsystem: 0

  Revision: 0

  Video memory: 0

  AudioDeviceIOBlockSize: 1024

  AudioDeviceName: Speakers (Realtek High Definition Audio)

  AudioDeviceNumberOfChannels: 2

  AudioDeviceSampleRate: 44100

  Build: not initialized

  Direct2DEnabled: false

  GPUDevice: not available

  OGLEnabled: true

  There are problems with the GPU. The first thing I would suggest you try is to performance tab in your Lightroom preferences and uncheck the box and see if that makes a difference. It has cleared up problems for many other users. The GPU acceleration seems to be a work in progress at this stage.

• The fan frequently betwenn oscilates fast and slow

  My satellite phone to old is 15 months - for the past 2 months, he developed a tendency to switch from one mode of ventilation of fast and slow in a cycle of a second. A colleague IT tried air compressed to clean any dust - this made little difference.
  Is this likely to lead to failure problem? Is this a case of dissambling fan housing and more thorough cleaning? Any suggestion would be appreciated.
  Thank you.

  Hello

  It of a simply that after awhile of use of the laptop it s necessary to clean the cooling module.
  During the use of the laptop fans suck up dust all the time. Usually, the dust is responsible for a bad performance of the cooling modules.

• The GPU acceleration is grayed out in first and AE, but not in Media Encoder. However, the rendering is slow in all 3 programs.

  It worked fine in CS6.

  Now, whenever I open a project (Pr or Ae) I get the message: this project has been modified used with accelerated by GPU rendering. This happens with all projects, even with those that I created in the Pr/Ae CC, with already disabled accelerated by GPU rendering.

  In Media Encoder, the GPU acceleration is not grayed out, but still if I made a first sequence or model ae via ME, its very very slow. (takes 5 hours for a video that took 20 minutes in CS6)

  Any thoughts?

  Thank you, Daniel

  I didn't have the time to post it yesterday, but you have found similar work around. What is happening is the decoding of earlier projects, or projects of the same version even sometimes won't boot the MPE of hardware engine. These files are cached and won't clear for this sequence until you delete the cache. 1 way to do is to replace the clips. The easiest is in the future change the EMT of the material to the MPE software and select delete the files from the cache when it invites. Then return to the MPE material and clear the cache again. That recreates the decoded files cache that often solves this problem.

  Eric

  ADK