Tunnel VPN S2S when there is no firewall remote site

Similar Questions

• Command to check the tunnel VPN S2S awhile in the cisco router

  Dear all,

  Please share the command check S2S tunnel of time that is configured on the router.

  There are commands that define the lifetimes of (his) IPSec Security Associations, ISAKMP.

  For example:

  crypto ISAKMP policy 1
  BA 3des
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  life 3600

  life 3599 seconds crypto ipsec security association

  ... and you can determine the remaining lifetime for these SAs with the following commands:

  SH detail session crypto

  SH in detail its crypto isakmp

  SH crypto ipsec his

  The delta between the lifetime (s) configured and remaining life will tell you how much time has passed since the last regeneration, but that is as close you are likely to have to determine when the tunnel came first.

  You could use other means as States of syslog for you say when a Tunnel is a transitioning upwards or downwards.

  Best regards

  Mike

• D750 takes 2 sec to fire when there are 2 lights remote control speed

  Tried the new D750 in situation with 2 remote flashes (nikon) device by the device itself. Shutter speed shows 200, but the camera takes about 2 seconds to take the image? Why, what's the problem

  It's the Adobe Camera Raw, not a Nikon forum hardware forum, so not a suitable place for your question.

  Maybe you accidentally put the custom setting: exposure delay Mode (d4 on the D800), unless you mean a 2 second exposure.

• Access to the DMZ to remote sites via VPN S2S

  We have an ASA 5520 and two remote site ASA 5505 that connect to each other through tunnels VPN S2S. They are doing tunneling split, while local traffic passes over the tunnel. We are local LAN (10.0.0.0/16) and our network to the DMZ (10.3.0.0/24) on the main site. The DMZ hosts our external sharepoint, but we access it internally

  The problem is site A (10.1.0.0/24) and B (10.2.0.0/24) have no idea of it, and when you try to go to the site, it fails. You can access it via the external site address, but that's the only way. Normally the external address is blocked when you're an intern.

  That I'm stuck on is even when we had all sent traffic from Site A to our Senior Center, would find it yet. I do a separate vpn purely tunnel that traffic to DMZ?

  Yes. So if you do this in ASDM under Edit Site profile connection Site, it will look like this.

  Local network: 10.0.0/16, 10.3.0.0/24

  Distance: 10.1.0.0/24

• AnyConnect VPN connection VPN site access to remote site

  I need our VPN users to gain access to our remote site (Site to Site VPN), there is no problem to access the main site through the VPN. Crypto map sites have the VPN pool in the card encryption.

  Any ideas?

  Here is the main Site (ASA5520) config inside 192.168.50.0

  crypto_vpn_remote-site access-list extended ip 192.168.50.0 allow 255.255.255.0 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0

  IP 192.168.99.0 allow Access-list extended site crypto_vpn_remote 255.255.255.0 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0

  inside_nat0_outbound to access extended list ip 192.168.50.0 allow 255.255.255.0 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0

  access extensive list ip 192.168.99.0 inside_nat0_outbound allow 255.255.255.0 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0

  Remote site (PIX 515E) inside 172.16.1.0

  access-list crypto_vpn_main-site permit ip 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.50.0 255.255.255.0

  access-list crypto_vpn_main-site permit ip 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.99.0 255.255.255.0

  access-list sheep permit ip 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.50.0 255.255.255.0

  access-list sheep permit ip 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.99.0 255.255.255.0

  VPN (AnnyConnect) 192.168.99.0

  On the main site, pls make sure that you have 'same-security-traffic permit intra-interface' active.

  Also, if you have split tunnel configured, please also make sure that he understands the Remote LAN (172.16.1.0/24).

  Hope that helps.

• Backup Tunnel VPN Firewall even

  I have 2 VPN tunnels on the same worm 6.3 pix firewall (5) tunnels goes to the remote site. On the remote site, there are 2 internet circuits has a primary and a secondary. The primary circuit goes to one tunnel on my firewall and secondary goes to another tunnel on my firewall that only appears when the primary circuit breaks down.

  We notice that when the primary circuit falls backup on the pix firewall tunnel is up but the traffic stops flowing after a few minutes and I need to erase the crypto isakmp before traffic starts to flow again.

  Am I missing something with my setups when VPN is similar to this type of installation?

  You must configure the tunnel dpd so that once the main tunnel breaks down the PIX must erase the SA for this tunnel.

  now based on the code that you have 6.3 (5), keepalive feature is not available

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/PIX/pix63/command/reference/c.html#wp1034654

  Thank you

  -Syed

• AnyConnect vpn and a tunnel vpn Firewall even outside of the interface.

  I have a (no connection) remote access vpn and ipsec tunnel connection to return to our supplier is on the same firewall outside interface.

  The problem is when users remote vpn in they are not able to ping or join the provider above the tunnel network.

  now, I understand that this is a Bobby pin hair or u turn due to traffic but I'm still not able to understand how the remote vpn users can reach the network of the provider on the tunnel that ends on the same interface where remote access vpn is also configured.

  The firewall is asa 5510 worm 9.1

  Any suggestions please.

  Hello

  You are on the right track. Turning U will be required to allow vpn clients access to resources in the L2L VPN tunnel.

  The essence is that the split tunneling to access list must include subnets of the remote VPN to peer once the user connects they have directions pertaining to remote resources on anyconnect VPN

  Please go through this post and it will guide you how to set up the u turn on the SAA.
  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/document/52701/u-turninghairpinning-ASA

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/ASA-5500-x-series-next-generation-firewalls/100918-ASA-sslvpn-00.html

  Kind regards
  Dinesh Moudgil

  PS Please rate helpful messages.

• Tunnel VPN site to Site with 2 routers Cisco 1921

  Hi all

  So OK, I'm stumped. I create much s2s vpn tunnels before, but this one I just can't go there. It's just a tunnel VPN Site to Site simple using pre-shared keys. I would appreciate it if someone could take a look at our configs for both routers running and provide a comment. This is the configuration for both routers running. Thank you!

  Router 1

  =======

  Current configuration: 4009 bytes

  !

  ! Last configuration change at 19:01:31 UTC Wednesday, February 22, 2012 by asiuser

  !

  version 15.0

  horodateurs service debug datetime msec

  Log service timestamps datetime msec

  no password encryption service

  !

  SJWHS-RTRSJ host name

  !

  boot-start-marker

  boot-end-marker

  !

  !

  No aaa new-model

  !

  !

  !

  !

  No ipv6 cef

  IP source-route

  IP cef

  !

  !

  DHCP excluded-address 192.168.200.1 IP 192.168.200.110

  DHCP excluded-address IP 192.168.200.200 192.168.200.255

  !

  IP dhcp POOL SJWHS pool

  network 192.168.200.0 255.255.255.0

  default router 192.168.200.1

  10.10.2.1 DNS server 10.10.2.2

  !

  !

  no ip domain search

  IP-name 10.10.2.1 Server

  IP-name 10.10.2.2 Server

  !

  Authenticated MultiLink bundle-name Panel

  !

  !

  Crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-236038042

  enrollment selfsigned

  name of the object cn = IOS - Self - signed - certificate - 236038042

  revocation checking no

  rsakeypair TP-self-signed-236038042

  !

  !

  TP-self-signed-236038042 crypto pki certificate chain

  certificate self-signed 01

  30820241 308201AA A0030201 02020101 300 D 0609 2A 864886 F70D0101 04050030

  8B1E638A EC

  quit smoking

  license udi pid xxxxxxxxxx sn CISCO1921/K9

  !

  !

  !

  redundancy

  !

  !

  !

  !

  crypto ISAKMP policy 10

  md5 hash

  preshared authentication

  ISAKMP crypto key presharedkey address 112.221.44.18

  !

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac IPSecTransformSet1

  !

  map CryptoMap1 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto

  defined by peer 112.221.44.18

  game of transformation-IPSecTransformSet1

  match address 100

  !

  !

  !

  !

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0/0

  192.168.200.1 IP address 255.255.255.0

  automatic duplex

  automatic speed

  !

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0/1

  Description wireless bridge

  IP 172.17.1.2 255.255.255.0

  automatic duplex

  automatic speed

  !

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/0/0

  Verizon DSL description for failover of VPN

  IP 171.108.63.159 255.255.255.0

  automatic duplex

  automatic speed

  card crypto CryptoMap1

  !

  !

  !

  Router eigrp 88

  network 172.17.1.0 0.0.0.255

  network 192.168.200.0

  redistribute static

  passive-interface GigabitEthernet0/0

  passive-interface FastEthernet0/0/0

  !

  IP forward-Protocol ND

  !

  no ip address of the http server

  local IP http authentication

  IP http secure server

  !

  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.17.1.1

  IP route 112.221.44.18 255.255.255.255 171.108.63.1

  !

  access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255 10.10.0.0 0.0.255.255

  !

  !

  !

  !

  !

  !

  control plan

  !

  !

  !

  Line con 0

  Synchronous recording

  local connection

  line to 0

  line vty 0 4

  exec-timeout 30 0

  Synchronous recording

  local connection

  transport input telnet ssh

  !

  Scheduler allocate 20000 1000

  end

  =======

  Router 2

  =======

  Current configuration: 3719 bytes

  !

  ! Last configuration change at 18:52:54 UTC Wednesday, February 22, 2012 by asiuser

  !

  version 15.0

  horodateurs service debug datetime msec

  Log service timestamps datetime msec

  no password encryption service

  !

  SJWHS-RTRHQ host name

  !

  boot-start-marker

  boot-end-marker

  !

  logging buffered 1000000

  !

  No aaa new-model

  !

  !

  !

  !

  No ipv6 cef

  IP source-route

  IP cef

  !

  !

  !

  !

  no ip domain search

  !

  Authenticated MultiLink bundle-name Panel

  !

  !

  Crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-3490164941

  enrollment selfsigned

  name of the object cn = IOS - Self - signed - certificate - 3490164941

  revocation checking no

  rsakeypair TP-self-signed-3490164941

  !

  !

  TP-self-signed-3490164941 crypto pki certificate chain

  certificate self-signed 01

  30820243 308201AC A0030201 02020101 300 D 0609 2A 864886 F70D0101 04050030

  2 060355 04031326 494F532D 53656 C 66 2 AND 536967 6E65642D 43657274 31312F30

  EA1455E2 F061AA

  quit smoking

  license udi pid xxxxxxxxxx sn CISCO1921/K9

  !

  !

  !

  redundancy

  !

  !

  !

  !

  crypto ISAKMP policy 10

  md5 hash

  preshared authentication

  ISAKMP crypto key presharedkey address 171.108.63.159

  !

  86400 seconds, duration of life crypto ipsec security association

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac IPSecTransformSet1

  !

  map CryptoMap1 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto

  defined by peer 171.108.63.159

  game of transformation-IPSecTransformSet1

  match address 100

  !

  !

  !

  !

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0/0

  no ip address

  automatic duplex

  automatic speed

  !

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0/0.1

  encapsulation dot1Q 1 native

  IP 10.10.1.6 255.255.0.0

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0/1

  IP 172.17.1.1 255.255.255.0

  automatic duplex

  automatic speed

  !

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/0/0

  IP 112.221.44.18 255.255.255.248

  automatic duplex

  automatic speed

  card crypto CryptoMap1

  !

  !

  !

  Router eigrp 88

  Network 10.10.0.0 0.0.255.255

  network 172.17.1.0 0.0.0.255

  redistribute static

  passive-interface GigabitEthernet0/0

  passive-interface GigabitEthernet0/0.1

  !

  IP forward-Protocol ND

  !

  no ip address of the http server

  local IP http authentication

  IP http secure server

  !

  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 112.221.44.17

  !

  access-list 100 permit ip 10.10.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

  !

  !

  !

  !

  !

  !

  control plan

  !

  !

  !

  Line con 0

  Synchronous recording

  local connection

  line to 0

  line vty 0 4

  exec-timeout 30 0

  Synchronous recording

  local connection

  transport input telnet ssh

  !

  Scheduler allocate 20000 1000

  end

  When the GRE tunnel carries your traffic to private ip range, your ACL must contain address of the host of point to point the IPSec tunnel.

  Since then, both routers are running EIGRP in the corporate network, let the EIGRP Exchange routes via GRE tunnel, which is a good practice, rather than push the ip ranges private individual through the IPSec tunnel.

  Let me know, if that's what you want.

  Thank you

• How to pass the traffic of a site VPN S2S by ASA to another S2S VPN site?

  I have a need for hosts on separate VPN networks connected to my ASA corp to communicate among themselves.  Example: Host A site 1 a need to communicate with host B on the site 2.  Both sites 1 & 2 are connected via the VPN S2S.  I would get every site traffic to flow through the ASA at the other site.  Where should I start my configuration?  NAT? ACL?

  I can ping each host in the network Corp. but cannot ping from one site to the other.  I set up same-security-traffic permit intra-interface and addition of NAT and rules the ACL to allow/permit 1 Site to contact Site 2.  When I do a trace of package through Deputy Ministers DEPUTIES, packets are allowed to pass. I read different that tell no NAT y at - it something at the other end of the VPN to do?  should NAT and ACLs rules be mirrored? Just in case, a site is an instance of MS Azure VM and the other is a 3rd party VM instance.

  On the HubASA, can I set up a new card encryption that selects the Site1 Site2 traffic and protect the traffic and value her counterpart Site2 public IP or just add this selection of traffic to the existing encryption card for the existing tunnel between HubASA and Site2?

  Just add this traffic to the existing encryption card.

  Remember that this should be added on three routers (two hubs and there has been talk).

  Site1

  CRYPTO ip access list allow Site2 subnet >

  CRYPTO ip access list allow subnet training3 >

  CRYPTO ip access list allow subnet HUB >

  Site2

  CRYPTO ip access list allow Site1 subnet >

  CRYPTO ip access list allow subnet training3 >

  CRYPTO ip access list allow subnet HUB >

  Training3

  CRYPTO ip access list allow Site1 subnet >

  CRYPTO ip access list allow Site2 subnet >

  CRYPTO ip access list allow subnet HUB >

  HUB

  CRYPTO_1 ip access list allow Site1 subnet >

  CRYPTO_1 ip access list allow Site1 subnet >

  CRYPTO_1 ip access list allow Site1 subnet >

  CRYPTO_2 ip access list allow Site2 subnet >

  CRYPTO_2 ip access list allow Site2 subnet >

  CRYPTO_2 ip access list allow Site2 subnet >

  CRYPTO_3 ip access list allow subnet training3 >

  CRYPTO_3 ip access list allow subnet training3 >

  CRYPTO_3 ip access list allow subnet training3 >

  Each of these ACLs is attributed to their respective crypto cards.  CRYPTO_1 is assigned the site1 crypto map, CRYPTO_2 is assigned to the site2 crypto card... etc.

  I hope that's clear

  In addition to this, you need to configure identity NAT / NAT provides both the HUB and the spokes of sites.

  --

  Please do not forget to select a correct answer and rate useful posts

• tunnel VPN ZFW problem

  Recently I tried to build a tunnel VPN of LAN LAN 2 connecting an Asa to a current zone based firewall 2911. It's a standard IPSec psk tunnel nothing complicated. I got the tunnel to establish, but I could only get traffic to encap on the side of the SAA and decap on the side of 2911. I couldn't return circulation. I followed this doc classic here for IPSec in the last example.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/prod/collateral/vpndevc/ps5708/ps5710/ps1018/...

  And I don't know that the SAA is right I have built a ton of those but I am new to zfw. I don't see anything about a NAT rule exempt. But as all used real IPs instead of NAT I wasn't sure and I have found no info. I do free NAT? If If you are using a roadmap on the end you NAT overload line config as in the past?

  I also have a pair of area to "self" and I didn't know if I need something there to be able to do a ping from inside the 2911 interface when the tunnel is at the top of the remote end. Thank you

  Is the pair area yourself, outside of itself?

  And you say that you do not use only NAT, have real addresses (public routable addresses?), so why you have to make an exception for NAT you have not?

• Ontario Regulation distributes dynamic routes via VPN S2S

  Hi halijenn / experts

  (1) please let me know if IPP works on a Site in tunnel

  (2) I have a behind remote ASA 10.10.1.0 and 10.10.2.0 network that must be distributed to another branch ASA with S2S ASA remote via OSPF

  3) there is an L3 Switch behind the ASA of the branch and Switch L3 there is a router that has a default route pointing router WAN

  Router WAN
  |
  |
  Users-> router-> L3 Switch-> ASA-> Internet-> remote ASA branch (10.10.1.0, 2.0)

  Note: 10.10.1.0 2.0 AND are already configured in the ACL Crypto at the ends.

  Users are able to reach the 10.10.2.X network to the remote end.

  Now for the 10.10.2.0 static routes are already there in the router and the switch finally pointing the ASA branch however as the network grows, it is impossible in the router behind the switch to add static whenever routes (such as the default route to router WAN points). This is why in order to learn routes dynamically, I will add an ospf process to the ASA to branch with the following configuration. Please let me know if iam correct when I add IPP and other OSPF commands to the ASA of the branch. (hope I have nothing to do on ASA remote associated with IPP or OSPF?)

  I take just an example of a remote host 1 10.10.1.4. Inside ASA interface leading to users is 172.16.1.0/24

  access-list redistribute allowed standard host 10.10.1.4 255.255.255.255

  router ospf 1
  network 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 area 0
  Journal-adj-changes
  redistribute static subnets redistribute route map

  In addition, I will also be allowing the order for IPP in the encryption of the VPN S2S said card.

  Please help me understand if I'm wrong

  Pls set the OSPF firstly on the SAA process before removing the static routes. Once you have confirmed that the OSPF is configured correctly and the roads are in the OSPF database, then you can delete the static routes. Static routes will always take precedence over OSPF because it has higher metric. Please keep the default route configured on the SAA.

  Hope that confirms it.

• Tunnel VPN ASA 5520 (DMZ + INSIDE) destined for OUTSIDE

  I can't find any reference to anywhere else.

  We have an ASA 5520 to our site HQ (inside the network) with several regional subnets on the DMZ interface.

  We need connectivity VPN Site to Site between the INSIDE and a remote control on the OUTSIDE of the site, as well as between the DMZ subnets and even outside the site. The interface from the OUTSIDE of the SAA must be local VPN endpoint for all tunnels.

  I created a S2S VPN between the INSIDE and the OUTSIDE site and it works great.

  When I create a VPN S2S tunnel between a site of DMZ and even outside the site (using the same settings the and remote, but with a cryptomap different because the local subnet (DMZ) is different from the other inside the subnet, the traffic gets the mapping (show crypto isakmp his) to the same cryptomap that was created for the access to the tunnel from the OUTSIDE) , instead of to the new cryptomap, so remote endpoint deletes it, and traffic also causes SPI incorrect of for the remote endpoint, which makes the original INTERIOR outside OF THE VPN tunnel to fall from time to time.

  Is this a bug?

  I also did a local S2S VPN tunnel configuration test of networks as everything INSIDE and the DMZ. With the help of the wizard VPN S2S leads ASA only to create a NAT rule exempted for the subnet on the INSIDE interface. Can I manually create another tax-exempt NAT rule to the side of the DMZ and use this a S2S tunnel to connect sites inside and DMZ to the remote OFF-SITE in a connection profile?

  I'm building a Rube Goldberg?

  Thank you

  George

  Hi George,.

  It seems you have a situation overlapping it, are you sure that subnets inside did not overlap with the networks from the DMZ?  A package tracer could clarify wha that the ASA is actually sending.

  In addition, you can merge the two interfaces on the same card encryption if you wish, just make sure that the NAT is configured correctly.   For example; Source NAT (all, outside) static...

  It may be useful

  -Randy-

• Tunnel VPN remote Internet and VPN remote VPN from Site to Site traffic?

  Hello

  We try to remote traffic from our users VPN tunnel through our ASA 5510 as well as to allow the only access for remote user VPN traffic to the other end of the all our VPN site-to-site connected to the same ASA. Basically, we who want to VPN in the network in order to access all of our networks business. We try to get away with this without using split Tunneling.

  I can currently get internal traffic from the remote user VPN to reach all other vpn site-to-site tunnels without the internet in tunnel. The problem is when I add the following statement to the NAT:

  NAT (outside) 1 10.10.19.0 255.255.255.0 * 10.10.19.0 is the address of the remote VPN Client

  Internet traffic to the remote VPN starts to get in the tunnel, but I lose the opportunity to reach one of the other tunnels from site to site by the remote VPN tunnel.

  I also begin to receive the following errors in the journal of the ASA

  3 July 1, 2009 12:34:18 305005 10.10.19.255 137 no group of translation not found for udp src outside:10.10.19.3/137 dst outside:10.10.19.255/137

  Any help with how NAT statements must be defined for this work would be appreciated.

  Thank you

  Will be

  Will,

  the link of this post for your scenario of vpn hub & speak reference, you problem may be on exempt nat rules.

  Have a second look at your sheep rules.

  Be sure to eliminate tunnel rules related to rheumatoid arthritis, as appropriate, to not let him get in the way of splitting.

  http://forums.Cisco.com/eForum/servlet/NetProf?page=NetProf&Forum=security&topic=firewalling&TopicId=.ee6e1fa&fromOutline=true&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cc2e0f6/4

  If always emits discribe topology for l2ls and info logic RA and sanatized hub config asa... but I think if you look at the thread above, you should be able to solve.

  Concerning

• Application of VPN S2S (with NAT)

  Hello experts,

  ASA (8.2) and standard Site 2 Site Internet access related configs.

  Outside: 1.1.1.1/24-> peer IP VPN S2S.

  Inside: Pvt subnets

  Standard "Nat 0' orders and crypto ACL for our remote offices, local networks with IP whp program.

  Requirement:

  Need to connect the PC to external clients (3.3.3.3 & 4.4.4.4) on tcp/443 via vpn S2S on our LAN. Client only accepts only the host with public IPs.

  I need NAT to my internal IP to the public IP say 1.1.1.2 and establish the VPN tunnel between 1.1.1.1-> PRi Client-side & secondary IPs (Cisco router).

  (without losing connectivity to remote offices). No policy NAT work here?

  ex:

  My Intern: 10.0.0.0/8 and 192.168.0.0/16
  Assigned IP available for NAT (some time to connect to the client only): 1.1.1.5

  External client LAN IPs: 3.3.3.3 & 4.4.4.4

  PAT: permit TOCLIENT object-group MYLAN object-group CUSTOMER LAN ip extended access-list

  NAT (inside) 5-list of access TOCLIENT

  5 1.1.1.5 (outside) global
      
   Crypto: tcp host 1.1.1.5 allowed extended CRYPTO access list object-group CUSTOMER LAN eq 443

  Outsidemap 1 crypto card matches the address CRYPTO
   
  Customer will undertake to peer with IP 1.1.1.1 only.

  Do I need a ' Nat 0' configs here?

  Also, for the specifications of the phase 2, it is not transform-set options gives. Info given was

  Phase2: AH: people with mobility reduced, life: 3 600 s, PFS: disabled, LZS Compression: disabled.
  This works with options of the phase 2?

  Thanks in advance

  MS

  Hello

  «Existing NAT (inside) 1 & global (outside) does not interfere with NAT 5 when users try to reach the ClientLAN.»

  Your inside nat index is '1', while the dynamic policy-nat is index '5 '.

  "" For the phase 2 in general, we define Crypto ipsec transform-set TEST ".

  Sure, the remote tunnel peers even accept transform set, everything you put up with the example below and distant homologous put the same tunnel.

  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA aes - esp esp-sha-hmac

  "In this scenario, no need to define any what and just add empty transform don't set statement under card crypto?

  No you need a defined transformation.

  "3. If we want to limit the destination port 443, I need to use separate VPN filters?

  That's right, use a vpn-filter.

  "4. we have several phase 1 configs, but wanted to use AES256 & DH5 (new policy)"... for s2s, these options work fine. ""

  Of course, you have set the phase 1, as required.

  Thank you

  Rizwan James

• Publish a server with NAT anchored through a tunnel VPN with ASA

  Hi all

  Thanks in advance for helping me out - I know somebody did, and I have trouble finding how do.  I don't know that I'm missing something simple.

  I have a client who wants to view a DVR device through a VPN tunnel that is published through the public firewall to collocation.  Endpoint DVR is endpoint ip assigned dynamically which tunnelle the host on demand (I know that the tunnel could fall).

  So I think / thought I could hairpin hair/policy nat this, but I'm not the best at this.

  Let's see if I can get this

  IP public 1.1.1.1\

  > External interface of ASA

  2.2.2.2 / private ip

  My config as I know it is pertinant is as follows:

  permit same-security-traffic intra-interface

  list of allowed incoming access extended ip any host 168.215.x.x

  Access-group interface incoming outside

  public static 168.215.x.x (outside, outside) 10.10.x.xnetmask 255.255.255.255

  I am running version 8.2.5 of the image of the SAA.

  If you could take a look and let me know what Miss me you please.

  Thank you

  Hello

  The problem here is of course the fact that we can not configure NAT0 without causing all traffic from the remote Internet can flow through the VPN connection.

  So I wonder if another type of NAT configuration would actually work.

  I would call it static political identity NAT if such a name exists yet.

  Something like that

  Note of DVR-POLICY-NAT-list of Direct HTTP access to VPN traffic

  allow to Access-list DVR-POLICY-NAT tcp host 10.10.2.253 eq 80 a

  public static 10.10.2.53 (inside, outside) access list DVR-POLICY-NAT

  This should basically do what

  • When the DVR is sending any traffic source TCP TCP/80 (essentially the traffic back to the connection from the main site) to ANY destination address (The Internet) then the host must translate to himself.
  • If we consider that NAT is performed before the VPN rules are processed this should mean that since we have concerns address itself, it must match the VPN rule only in this particular case where the traffic is TCP/80, which could only be the result of her replying to a link any destination TCP/80)
  • Which leads me to believe it shouldn't cause any problems with the Central connection on remote site (NAT0 is processed before political static NAT) or the RECORDER to Internet
  • Unless the DVR must be accessible directly via the Internet connection of the remote site. (He would send his answers to these HTTP connections outside with the originating source IP address) Or maybe even completely before connecting the phase failure. I have not tested.

  Hope this helps

  Be sure to mark it as answered in the affirmative. And/or useful response rate.

  Ask more if necessary.

  EDIT: typos

  -Jouni