Ultra Wide Color Gamut of the F55

Similar Questions

• Overview of the library with wide colors

  Hello

  is there a way to make the images of the library in wide color like in the mode to develop? It's very uncomfortable to see different colors between the two modes.

  BR

  Jao vdL wrote:

  Set the quality of your preview on high and Lightroom use prophotoRGB for jpeg previews.

  I'm not completely sure, this is no longer true.

• External ultra wide screen not working not not on MBP 15

  Hello - Ok, I spent a ridiculous amount of time on it so I hope that someone has had this problem before.

  We have a few that ultrawide poster here and each one has a resolution of 2560 x 1080. We also have a couple 13 '' Macbook pro 15. They do not seem to get along well.

  Symptom1: When plugged into the ultra wide monitors via HDMI, the resolution is 2560 x 1080 native, but this is horrible... text is blurry, the colours are strange, just terrible.

  Symptom2: If connect us via Thunderbolt monitors in a Dual Link DVI cable, image is more neat and clean, but OS X allows only a max of 1920 x 1080 resolution.

  More information: this happens on all of our ultra screens wide. When plug us these screens on a pc, it is literally plug and play. These aren't the high-end computers in the slightest... much cheaper than our Mbps.

  Anyone run into this and you could provide guidance?

  Thank you!

  try to access resolutions additional skins to Apple for some reason any

   > System Preferences > display

  Click the radio button "Chipped" while holding down the OPTION key.

• What is the disadvantage of savings WITHOUT color profile for the web?

  I have discussed this issue in another thread and a clear argument against saving jpg files * without * a color profile must be performed.

  I'm very annoyed with how much more red and saturated, all my jpg files appear in IE (which does not read the sRGB embedded profile) compared to FF (which is the case).

  I tried to save the image even with the inclusion of unchecked color profile, and of course, IE and FF are showing the same image.

  It seems to me that including color profiles with jpg are just an invitation for different browsers interpret the image differently.

  Why not just save them all, WITHOUT color profiles?

  The downside to this, what exactly?

  mjyeager wrote:

  Emil, please do not confuse what follows for stubbornness...

  No worries, I never had such thoughts

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... IE does not read color profiles. The fact of FF. ERGO, in situations where a color profile is involved, the JPG will be different in each browser.

  True, without color managed programs and management the colors may not display an image in the same way. Except in the situation where the color profile describing the color of the image or the color values of an image without a color profile, by an extraordinary chance match the display capabilities of color of the device used by the program managed without colors.

  One of the problems that the addresses of color management is that all monitors will display the same color differently. Color management will make colors appear the same or as close as possible.

  A color managed program will send the RGB values of the color of the video card corrected to compensate for the differences between how your monitor displays color values and how they are perceived.

  For example, to help my Monitor wide gamut, when I create an image in Photoshop, with a red color pure R = 255, G = 0 and B = 0 and then do a screen capture, I can check how Photoshop sends these values to the video card. The result is R = 222, G = 65, B = 0 when I'm simulating an ideal sRGB display. So I can see how my colors appear on the screens of ideal sRGB. However, in reality, it is very likely to have a monitor displaying space sRGB color ideal without a color management, so to complete the color management chain, the other monitors that display my image must also have the appropriate color management to compensate for the differences in screen and display correctly RGB numbers representing the color that I see on my screen.

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... However, if the JPG has no color profile, image shows exactly the same way in both browsers...

  Who will most likely be a bad smell, which means not repoducing the expected color which is always the case with the browsers managed without colors.

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... Now, let's say this image - which looks the same in both browsers - is too hot. I can load it in Photoshop, change its hue and re-save is more what I'm looking for. The resulting image will then out - in the two browsers identically - the way I want to...

  Yes, the image will be the same in both browsers on your and any other monitor but the colors that you create (edit) will examine the way which only see you them on your monitor.

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... Now, what I think you are trying to do, is that I have no control on what are the conditions of viewing on the OTHER end (i.e., visitors to the site). They could range wide monitors, cheaper monitors, running MAC or PC, etc...

  I don't remember talking about this earlier, but yes, it's true.

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... It's true. I have no control over that. However, how including the color profile sRGB with the JPG would give me more control over these things I would not include? Unless you had to tell me that browsers arbitrarily apply a random color profile when in the absence of one, I am simply not understand how including the color with the JPG profile performs one another act that ensure that the picture is completely different in FF it does in Internet Explorer.

  You who are absolutely wrong. Color management is not to have any control over how other devices are setup, calibrated, etc.. As I said earlier make sure you communicate the colors scheduled correctly or as close as possible, as long as you and the destination use the proper color management. This means that the embedded profile FF will display correctly the planned colors while IE will not. If you do not include a color profile with your image both FF and IE will not display correctly the planned colors but they will be equal in that.

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... I understand the need for color profiles to print. In fact, my printer insists on the details when it comes to color profiles.

  But for the web? I'm still not understand where the downside is to omit the color profile. It's not like the browsers get CONFUSED when it is not included. Or that the colors will start randomly from refreshing one page to another.

  I am really trying to understand what you are saying here, but still haven't.

  In addition to what Marian said:

  If you create the colors using an sRGB display ideal (given the color management on your system works properly, it can be simulated by color of Photoshop on your range management widescreen when you assign the profile sRGB color to the image) and then on any ideal sRGB display, it will look the same you see on your screen regardless if it's with or without embedded sRGB color profile. However, in reality, it is unlikely to have a monitor, sRGB, display of the ideal space of sRGB color without color management. Now what does this mean in practice? Assume that users interested in, using the IE managed without colors on a PC with the Windows default color management. In other words, color management programs are told by the system monitor displays the ideal sRGB space, which is very likely to be the truth. Then users with this configuration with sRGB monitors will not see a difference between IE and FF when viewing your image with or without sRGB profile, the colors are not very likely to be the same that you see on the screen, but with the difference that is more likely to be accepted depending on how close to the ideal color space sRGB these monitors are. If some of these users with this configuration have wide range monitors, then the image will always be the same with or without sRGB profile, but with a very unacceptable difference of how you see it on your space to sRGB sumulated - strongly supersaturated.

  For users that have the color correctly managed systems, when the image is saved with a sRGB profile, it appears color managed programs such as FF the same or as close as possible to the way in which you can see on your monitor. Programs run without colors the case remains the same as that described above.

  A little history on how standard sRGB was created. It is a standard, including more things, but above all defining an abstract color space. It was created sometime after that the market was already flooded with computer monitors, and the creation of ideal sRGB color space was based on an average PC monitor display capabilities over time. After that the manufacturers used this standard sRGB as a target to create monitors.

  UN-color of programs run on PC have been created and tested using sRGB monitors so that they can't be considered reliable for showing intended to display colors if the images they use have been created using an sRGB they will be in the stadium of this range of sRGB.

• macOS Sierra no longer supports monitors ultra wide angle?

  Just install macOS Sierra and the required resolution for this monitor ultra wide LG no longer appears. Anyone know of a work around?

  

  My problem with my monitor LG UltraWide is now that it will expand just the 1920 x 1080 rather than on el capitan, where he could go to 2560 x 1080, seems like Apple just ditches ultra wide support

• Vertical color bars on the left side of the window?

  Arch Linux, 64-bit

  Radeon HD 7750 w / Mesa 10.6.4

  GNOME 3.16.2

  Firefox 40.0.2 (problem does not occur on FF 39.0.3)

  Any Firefox window has an early color portrait region (20-or-so pixels wide) just under the title bar of the system and extending to the bottom of the window of FF. The region begins as a color (1) single, but then, as the viewport changes (2) that this region is segmented into subregions of assorted independently. Several windows of maintains their own independent color region.

  If multiple windows of firefox are open, each has its own region. Menus contextual (e.g. right click anywhere in the window of FF) also have such a region. Disable all extensions, plugins and themes has no effect.

  (1) the colors I have observed are still basic (cyan, magenta, yellow, green, blue, red, gray). When the color is set or changed (described below) the color seems to be set randomly - that is to say, I can't distinguish a model on how

  (2) the scrolling window or by invoking a dialog modal/guest/file browser will cause the entire region move to another color. Some (I can't nail down the rhyme or reason) changes at the level of the block to a page will cause a subregion to appear horizontally aligned of the said block. Changes to the scale of the "reset" of these subregions page. Animations on the resulting page of color variations (for example, discoloration in a div of modal superimposition or sliding slow upward from the Firefox address bar when you enter fullscreen) will lead the fast color change during the animation and transition period. Blur in the window of Firefox or by using the key PrintScreen resets also the whole region to a color, so I am unable to get a screengrab of the different subregions.

  Is this a problem with Firefox? Where can I file a bug report? Mozilla? GNOME? X? Mesa?

  I just wanted to post an update. I revisited once more this issue to try to understand what was the problem (this time with v44.0).

  Once again, no change in settings solved the problem, or does disabling extensions and themes.

  However, this time, a newly created profile does not show the behavior. This new profile, I have installed all my extensions and themes, set up my custom settings and I have not seen the problem come back for days now.

  Don't know what happened here. The update of v39 v40 (with no other changes) introduced this strange artifact, that at first, is not solvable with a new profile, but it is now. I am at a loss.

• iMac 5K with ultra wide screen LG

  Hello

  I just ordered a 5K iMac and I currently have an LG monitor ultra wide 34UC87-C I had to connect to the Mac. My question is which compatible cable should I buy given the resolution 3440 x 1440 p of the external monitor. It is not a thunderbolt port, but a display port & 2 HDMI ports.

  I saw a few cables as poster thunderbolt or HDMI port for love at first sight available on Amazon, but I'm not sure that one to choose or provide you with the best image quality.

  Thank you in advance for the clarification.

  http://www.LG.com/us/monitors/LG-34UC87C-B-UltraWide-led-monitor

  You want to use a Mini DisplayPort Connector Display Port cable.

  to see a few examples > http://www.amazon.com/s/?ie=UTF8 & keywords = thunderbolt + to + displayport

• Samsung Ultra wide angle (S29E790C) Compatibiblity

  Hello

  I have a laptop USPHL-LT-1238RG and wishes to buy a monitor Samsung ultra wide, specifically the model S29E790C.  My laptop is useful with this model?  Would there be problems?

  Best regards

  Samantha

  DisplayPort is a specific type of interface for the transport of signals from a computer to a monitor. I know that this monitor has a Displayport connection for the input signal. The reason why I need to know the model of the laptop is to see if it supports Displayport out.

  The cable looks like this:

  

  https://en.Wikipedia.org/wiki/DisplayPort

  And your laptop has a displayport on it. See page 2 item 2 of the plug here:

  http://WWW8.HP.com/h20195/v2/GetPDF.aspx/c04472796.PDF

  Samsung also provides the software for monitors ultra wide angle that is useful.

  If it's 'the Answer' please click on 'Accept as Solution' to help others find it.

• Software monitors ultra-wide desperately need to change!

  I just bought 2 x U2913WM. I must say they are very good (I need a lot of space on the screen for my work and I used 3 monitors to cover what I need, the 2 ultra-wides do same work as the 3 regular monitors for me). I must say that Dell has done a very good job by jumping into this trend. I'm almost happy. There is however a small problem and I hope that Dell will fix it up soon (given that it's very new range of monitors and hard to get the stock to the United Kingdom-, I waited 2 weeks to receive). The question is in ease of use. Obviously a normal person cannot use such a wide screen as a regular monitor (most of the time, for me it is 99% of the time) - when you need a few windows on the same screen and you would not bother to try adjust sizes whenever you jump a high window - to keep do not overlap and beautiful and tidy... Right... This is the display Dell Manager... It was a great job for you help organize your desktop. You can pin your windows in small spaces of customizable virtual display... Which is what is needed! However, there is a hiccup I want Dell to resolve as soon as possible... The problem is that whenever you take a window of the header - display Manager starts working and there is no way to avoid once the window is caught. So - you can not move a window without being pinned as soon as you release (maximized in the closest of the virtual screen). It's _very_ counterproductive because there are a lot of small windows that must remain the size they are, and if you want to move them they must leave with this size... I would like that someone from Dell support to spread my comments to team development as soon as possible. I don't know that this can be resolved very easily (for example if you add a keyboard stokes in this image, you can simply have for example Ctrt + Window_Grab to mean - do not pin the window etc.). I use Windows 7 x 64. Thank you

  maxima120

  I... whenever you take a window by the header - display Manager starts to work and there is no way to avoid once the window is caught...

  Now try the SHIFT key while dragging the window.

• Want Phoenix 850: Color tape before the machine

  WANT Phoenix to a stip of color on the front of the chassis. What doe the various colors mean. Currently is in red. It is a color that can be changed or they change based on the use of the CPU?

  I have the exact model.  There is an application called HPPhoenixControl that you can run to make changes to the colors to bicycle and how long between color changes.  You can also turn off the lights all together or just to have a single color.

  The file is located in c:\ProgramFiles(x86) \Hewlett-Packard\HPPhoenixCtrl.exe.  If I remember, when I was first of all the machine I saw this program in the Start Menu or anywhere else.  I think I stumbled on it any type of and he ran to see what he would do.  Have fun...

• You can change the color palette in the quick selection of fonts pane?

  In the sidebar on the right formatting, there are a few options if you want to change the font colors.  One option is to click on the color wheel that then evokes the different options to choose as a method to select your color.  The median option on top gives a simple dropdown menu with a range of colors.

  The other option is to click on the color box in the sidebar format indicating a fast grid of colors to choose.  I wonder if there is a way to get this grid to display the same colors as the average tab on the previous method.  Mainly because the blue on this tab is better for me than the spread rather watery blues when you click the font color box.

  Hoe the description logical :/

  Possible not to my knowledge, the colors have been written in the program.

  You can make a style of the object and which correspond with styles of text etc.

  In the color picker , the 3rd icon from the left is named colors, you can create and name your own, but they are not portable, right on your Mac.

  They will be available in any other application that uses the color on your Mac picker.

  Peter

• Satellite A210-109: how to change the color temperature of the display?

  I want to know how to change the color temperature of the screen of my laptop? Theres no option in the ATI catalyst and no toshiba utility, where I can change this? I have the latest installed toshiba display drivers.

  Hello

  you mean the gamma settings? I don't know if the ati drivers are able to do, but you can try the program "powerstrip" (www.download.com/PowerStrip/3000-2086_4-10395724.html), which can change the color and the parameter gamma for graphics cards.

  Just give it a try and you will get your favorite color settings. :)

  Welcome them

• Does anyone know if WIDI is possible on the Yoga 2 13 and ideapad flex 14?

  Does anyone know if WIDI is possible on the Yoga 2 13 and ideapad flex 14?

  RichardTheKing wrote:

  Does anyone know if WIDI is possible on the Yoga 2 13 and ideapad flex 14?

  It is possible if you have an Intel 7260 card.

  Signle of N strips, double N band and versions (sorry) AC WiDi support.

• Sony 18-252 Zoom on the F55

  I know there was a lot of discussion on this goal in the past, and I just wanted to know if people are successfully using this on the F55? Did this work entirely as a servo lens? What autofocus back? I remember there is currently a problem with that.

  http://CVP.com/index.php?t=product/sony_scl-z18x140

  I find my solution Optitek/Canon a bit tedious sometimes when I have jobs that does not (or cannot afford) PL lenses, and if I come back in light of this objective. It would be good to know if people are using and enjoying.

  If someone is selling I would also consider a used. Thank you.

  Jamie

  
  

• Ultra Dock is Compatible with the standard T530?

  I wonder if the Dock Ultra really does not support any laptop any more. I have a T530 with Optimus graphics. I had a dock Mini Series 3 (pre - USB 3.0) for about 2 years and am looking for a get a dock for another office, I often use. Lenovo sells directly over the Mini plus series 3 ones. I have 2 years of warranty, but Lenovo will not sell a dock for it? This is why I think the Dock Ultra can take care of the older laptops. In addition, some sites say the new are replacements for the "old" and Lenovo to talk about how they are smaller than the Mini Series 3 (but if they were they option only for your model, then why this question?).

  So I would like to hear from someone who has tried or has less physically T530 or similar compared to a new series to see if the docking connector is different. It would be ideal for a person of Lenovo to also be able to answer this question directly (and not seem as they are simply read the data sheet, what I can do).

  Thank you.

  The ultradock dock connector is different to the connector dock series 3. If they are not compatible. Not only the size of the connector are also different, internal wiring and the shape is also different.