Uplink speed

Similar Questions

• WRT1900AC very low flow

  I am experiencing speed very low flow (cable) on my WRT1900AC. My ISP bandwidth is 70Mbps down and 6 Mbps to the top, if I connect my main POC directly to the modem, I get near these speeds (usually ~ 68Mbps down and 6.1Mbps upwards). When it is connected through my WRT1900AC, uplink speed is fine, but the downlink speed drops to ~ 15Mbps.

  I tried to turn off the two WiFi frequencies and disconnect all other peripheral cable with the same result, ~ 15Mbps in connection speed descendant.

  I have reset the modem (without change) and powered by the WRT1900AC down and upward - once again no change.

  Any ideas?

  Which Service provider Internet do you have? Cable or DSL?
  What ISP Internet Modem MFR. and model # you have?

  Prioritization of media is enabled? Disable it and retest.

  Make sure that you test browser with speed test sites and the location of server different speed for a good overall speed test.

• High availability with two 5508 WLAN controllers?

  Hi all

  We are considerung to implement a new wireless solution based on Cisco WLC 5508 and 1262N Access Points. We intend to buy about 30 access points and have two options: either buy a WLC 5508-50 or, for redundancy to, two controllers 5508-25.

  Is it possible to configure two WLC 5508 as a high availability solution, so that all access points are distributed on the two WLCs and during breaks WLC one another case manages all the APs?

  If we have 30 access points, and one of the two WLC 5508-25 breaks of course that not all access to 30 but only 25 points can be managed by one remaining. Is there some sort of control to choose the access points must be managed and which do not?

  How does such a configuration looks like in general, is the implementation of an installation of two controller quite complex or simple?

  Thank you!

  Michael

  Hi Michael,

  Do not forget that the 5508 works with a system of licensing. The hardware can support up to 500 APs, but it depends on the license that you put in.

  I think 2 5508 with 25 APs license will be more expensive than a 5508 with 50 APs license.

  If you have 2 WLCs, the best is NOT to spread access between the WLCs points. In doing so, you increase the complexity of homelessness (WLCs have to discount customers to each other all the time). If your point was to gain speed, it really doesn't matter as the 5508 can have up to 8 Gbit/s of uplink speed and has the ability of UC to treat 50 APs with no problems at all. So I find it best to have all the access points on 1 WLC, then if something goes wrong, all the APs migrate anyway for the other WLC.

  If you want 50 APs at a 25-degree WLC failover, you can select who will join Yes. The APs have a priority system, so you assign priorities. If the WLC sees it's full capacity but higher priority APs are trying to join, it will kick down-prio APs for the high prio allow to connect.

  WLCs is not exactly "HA." It's just that if you have 2 WLCs work together (as if you had 700 APs and needed to put 2 WLCs) and delivered to customers. Or all APs sat on a WLC and when it breaks down, they join the other available controller.

  The only thing to do is to put each WLC in the same group of mobility so that they know.

• OVF import directly to ESXi without going through the bottleneck of Vsphere client

  I'm currently installing the OVF VMA to ESXi 4.1. ESXi is installed in a data center. VSphere client is installed on my computer at home.

  I chose the URL to install from the ESXi thought it would download directly, but no, it seems that the VSphere client wants to download and then upload to the data center via my broadband connection bottleneck domestic. I'm looking now to 233 minutes to make all this happen.

  I'm still on a learning curve steep then there may be something obvious that I missed, but is it possible that I can bypass the internet connection is slow my home computer (I only have 1.3Mbps uplink speed) and deploy the OVF directly in the data center?

  There are command line tools that I can run on, say, a VM Linux running VSphere CLI to do the same thing? I couldn't find anything in PDF files, I watched so far.

  Thank you...

  Welcome to the community,

  you do not have access to the vCenter Server? In this case, you can open a vCenter Server RDP session and run the top vSphere Client to download and import the vMA.

  André

• dvUplink/consolidation and failover

  I have a question related to how work dvuplink about failover link...

  Let me say that I have this kind of configuration:

  dvSwitch configured with 4 dvUplink (calling it dvu1 dvu2 dvu3 dvu4).

  Group 1 with 5 guests must use 2 of these dvuplink as active/active (have 2 bear set to dvu1 and dvu2)

  Group 2 with 5 guests need to use the other 2 of these active dvuplink / standby (dvu3 is a 10g and the dvu4 of the auxiliary card is only 1 g)

  the portgroup with vkernel interface is configured so that it has:

  Active Dvuplinks:

  dvu1

  dvu2

  dvu3

  Dvuplinks standby:

  dvu4

  On the second group (the one with the 10g and 1 g), it seems that I see traffic on the two cards.

  I expect that having only configured dvu3 and dvu4 the dvu4 will be not IN as a failover for dvu1 or dvu2 because these uplink are not yet configured on this host.

  Only 2 dvuplink port configuration and put in active / standby as expected.

  This is the normal behavior of dvUplink ports?

  Yes, it is the operation of the grouping algorithm in ESX.  Your policy is essentially interpreted like 'trying to keep active rising 3.  ESX will bring a watch at any time he does not 3 active uplinks, and get the hosts with no bear attached to an uplink port treated the same as if there was a bear here with the status of the link down.  The only way to accomplish what you want really currently would be to use separate vDS for types of different hosts.

  A question for you, however, no doubt that you try to configure this way bc you want ESX to promote the 10G uplink in hosts that have this.  Would be establishment of a scheduling IO which reflected uplink speed while for example if you attached a 1 G and 10G uplink active/active, you will see a 10:1 ratio of movement promoting the 10G meet your needs?  Or do you see with a need to specify the grouping on a per host, rather than by portgroup basis?

• The question of the Uplink port speed

  Hi there guys!

  I want to set my 4 GB uplink port speed, but the UCSM show me only 1/10/20/40 GB. How do I change the port speed trought CLI?

  Greetings.

  Here's our UCS 2.0 running and I am able to adjust the speed of uplink FC

  ucsfi-01-A / CF-uplink/fabric/port-channel # show in detail

  Port channel:
  Channel port Id: 255
  Name: ucs-n5k-pc255
  Admin State: enabled
  Oper State: to the top
  Admin speed: Auto
  Oper speed (Gbps): 32

  ucsfi-01-A / CF-uplink/fabric/port-channel # set adminspeed
  1 Gbps 1 Gbps
  2 Gbps 2 Gbps
  4 Gbps 4 Gbps
  8 Gbps 8 Gbps
  Auto Auto

• BEFSR81 v1 WAN speed

  Hi all, I just have to move to a 10 Mbps aDSL connection. I measured the bandwidth of download as about 5 Mbps with the router in the circuit. Without the router (i.e. directly connect the modem ZyXEL 660R to host) and the modem mode bridge or router, I am able to get the full 10 Mbps. I updated the firmware on the router to 2.45.10 and changed the host system RWIN to the value calculated from "optimal" and the MTU to be equal, 1500, on the router & host. One of these values does not affect bandwidth significantly - less popular ACK with superior RWIN, as expected, but no real change in speed. Does anyone have any suggestions? TIA, Art

  N (new): the specification of 10 Mbps in the data sheet only shows you what technical specification follows the port on the router. It is a 10 Mbps port. It works with any other 10 Mbps devices and devices that are backward compatible with 10 Mbps. As FastEthernet or Gigabit Ethernet are backwards compatible you can connect to it even but of course only based on the specification of 10 Mbps.

  The technical specification defines how the port and Cap like looks, wiring of pins etc.. The technical specification says nothing about the speed of the unit using this port is.

  If you buy a computer today data sheet will tell 'Gigabit Ethernet Port' or '1000 Mbps Ethernet Port' or maybe ' 10/100/1000 Ethernet Port. It is once again the technical specification of this ethernet port. It is compatible with Gigabit Ethernet devices. It is not that the device is able to provide data of 1000 Mbps or receive it.

  The same is true for your BEFSR81. The data sheet BEF does not say it is able to provide 10 Mbps routing performance. The data sheet only tells you that the WAN port is a port of Mbit/s Ethernet standard 10. That's all. It is the same as for any other computer spreadsheet data, peripheral NAS, or similar.

  With regard to the switches: you no longer need uplink ports. Basically, all devices are auto-negotiation and they automatically detect what device it is connected, and which cable (crossover or straight) you use. If you buy a switch gigabit today he will most definitely have all ports to auto-negotiation on that and you can connect to another device that you like. You can also connect to your BEF by using port uplink or one of its other ports. The port allows to detect what you have...

  I recommend you to get a gigabit or may even switch 2 If you need more ports. Switches with more ports are generally more expensive, then using 2 small switches. Of course, it depends a little on your LAN configuration. You don't want your main stream crossing 2 switches. But, for example, if you have a few devices in the living room and even more in the Home Office, it can be a good idea to use a switch in the living room and the other in the Home Office. All streaming etc. would remain in life and not hit the switch in the Office at home. If, however, much since stream you life Home Office one switch could be better.

  With regard to the switches, once again, a word of warning. If a switch has 8 full-duplex 10/100/1000 Ethernet ports that it does not say you can connect 8 devices full gigabit speed give and receive at the same time (i.e. full duplex) 1000 Mbps. The switch must receive 8000 Mbps and send 8000 Mbps at the same time. Very often, you will find data sheets do not mention the possible real rate of a switch. More expensive switches usually refer to the flow of the "basket" or something similar. If a switch 8 ports would say he is able to manage 16000 Mbps on the backplane, then you would get full flow possible. But if anything like this mentioned that it is quite possible that it handles than less. You may be able to get transmissions complete gigabit on some ports but may never all at the same time, for example if backplane is only able to handle 4000 Mbit/s. The data sheet tells you that the technical specification of the integrated equipment, but not how fast he is...

  Thus, I'd get the standard gigabit for your local network and a router switches more fast which is capable of managing your internet connection. In view of the increase in the speed of the internet in the future I expect to get a new router in 2-3 years. For the moment, the most important thing would be that it should be able to handle the speed of 100 Mbps WAN. This should work for 2-3 years...

  One place to find the actual flow of routers is smallnetbuilder. Unfortunately, they have not all models of router it...

• Port of uplink on PowerConnect 8024F went to the D State down

  Hi all

  We had a strange behavior on one of our switches PowerConnect 8024F. The uplink port of the device (connected to a port on a Cisco Catalyst 6513 10Gig) came down. The output of 'show interfaces status' looked like this:

  Port speed Duplex Neg frothing link Description
  Status of the State
  ---------  -------------------------  ------  -------  ----  ------ ------------
  TE1/0/1 cat6500-rz-1 (te11/2) 10000 Full Off D-low idle
  TE1/0/2 pc8024-ub-1 (te1, 0, 1) complete 10000 Off place Active
  TE1/0/3 pc8024-uv-1 (te1, 0, 1) complete 10000 Off place Active
  TE1/0/4 pc5500-naf02n-1 (te1, 0, 1) complete 10000 Off place Active
  TE1/0/5 pc5500-naf04n-1 (te1, 0, 1) complete 10000 Off place Active
  TE1/0/6 pc5500-naf03-1 (te1, 0, 2) 10000 Full Active Off
  TE1/0/7 pc8024-mensa-1 (te1, 0, 1) complete 10000 Off place Active
  Defekt TE1/0/8 n/a unknown inactive low Auto
  TE1/0/9 pc5500-naf03-2 (te1, 0, 1) complete 10000 Off place Active
  TE1/0/10 pc5500-naf03-3 (te1, 0, 1) complete 10000 Off place Active
  ...

  .. and so on. Firmware is 5.1.2.3. We rebooted the device and he returned to normal behavior.

  Now, can someone explain to me what the "D-Down" State means? I have not found anything in the documentation and using google not any success.

  The configuration of the port looks like the following:

  Description ' cat6500-rz-1 (te11/2).
  MTU 9216
  switchport mode general
  switchport general allowed vlan add 4-5, 14, 22-2729-33, 36, 39-41, 43 tag
  switchport general allowed vlan add 47,51-52,54-56,58-60,63-64,66,75,78-79 tag
  switchport general allowed vlan add 81, 86-90, 93-99, 107, 120, 122 tag
  switchport general allowed vlan add 124 132 - 135, 137, 140, 142-143 147-152 154 tag
  switchport general allowed vlan add 156-157, 160, 165-166, 171, 173-175 the tag
  switchport general allowed vlan add 177-178 180-181, 183, 189, 192, 195-196 the tag
  switchport general allowed vlan add 199,201,203-205 207-208 210-212 the tag
  switchport general allowed vlan add 219-222 224-225 227-233 235-244 246 tag
  switchport general allowed vlan add 248-249, 253, 256, 258-260 262-267 tag
  switchport general allowed vlan add 269-272 274-276 278-279, 282, 284, 286-288 the tag
  switchport general allowed vlan add 292 295 - 298, 323, 344, 347, 349 tag
  switchport general allowed vlan add 354,362,366,370,372,378-380 382-383 385-386 tag
  switchport general allowed vlan add 391,399,405,431,443,447 tag
  switchport general allowed vlan add 475-476, 485, 488, 511, 522, 584, 700-703 710-714 tag
  switchport general allowed vlan add 725,734,838,854-855 909 tag
  switchport general allowed vlan add 950 961 - 962, 981, 999, 1234, 1236, 2205, 2218-2220 tag
  switchport general allowed vlan add 2222,2233,2414,2417 tag
  switchport general allowed vlan add 2506-2507, 2519, 2521, 2621, 2699 tag
  Access-group PVST Mac - filter 1
  LLDP transmit tlv sys - name sys - cap
  LLDP transmit-mgmt

  The used mac filter access PVST-group is:

  Mac-extended access list filter-PVST
  refuse any 0100.0CCC. RCC 0000.0000.0000
  allow a full
  output

  Thanks for reading and suggestions!

  Robin

  It's all associated spanning-tree protocols. D to the bottom is synonymous with diagnostic downwards, which occurs if more than 15 BPDU per second is received during 3 seconds. The switch closes the port. USL worker task is bound traffic so a big change covering tree cause it's really high.

• 2960 x FPS-L-48 uplinks and flow

  I have a pile of (4) 2960 X FPS-L-48 switches that support SFP only this will be the uplink, through fiber, to another pile of (2) 2960 FPS - L - 48 FPS X switches only.  A port channel will be created between the two batteries.  I need to know what would be the flow on the channel of port between the batteries.

  Thanks in advance.

  The potential flow will be the combined speed of the interfaces in the etherchannel.

  Keep in mind, but that, for the same conversation between two end devices etherchannel uses the same physical link across it is so important to choose the right method of load balancing.

  The Guide configuration for more details-

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/switches/LAN/catalyst2960x/software/15-2_2_e/Layer2/configuration_guide/b_layer2_1522e_2960x_cg/b_layer2_1522e_2960x_cg_chapter_0100.html#con_1275731

  Jon

• UCS 6120 uplink and 1 Gbps

  Hello

  How can I pay my UCS 6120 Xp for 1 Gpbs speed as uplink to my switch to Upsteream I have only 1 G CLC MM wide

  MY UCS is 1.2 me I need to upgrade the software?

  could you help her

  Yes, you must be on 1.3 to support the option of 1 GB uplink. With firmware 1.3 8 first fixed ports are the only ones who take charge of 1 GB.

• SRW2024 + uplink SRW2048 problem

  Hi all.

  I have two switches SRW2024 and SRW2048

  I had connected on SRW2048 (Switch 1) single PC and SRW 2024 (Switch2) iscsi SAN, ESX Server and a couple of NAS.

  I use to uplink port 2024 12 and 48 of 2048.

  Now in this situation when I connect to my PC (1 switch) to ESX SERVER and try to download a data store the speed is very slow.

  If I change the position of my PC to spend 1-2 switch che connection ethernet cable is perfect, because going to the uplink and go directly to the switch.

  I think the problem is on the uplink cable, I try to change the cable and the port, use optical miniGb... but the result does not change.

  Because now I don' t have any VLAN, use the switch without trunk or other default settings normal setting.

  Another thing... If I use 2 normal switch without management... perfect work, the problem is the management of the uplink on SRW2024\2048 setting.

  Any idea?

  Thank you all for any help.

  Hello

  What you describe is quite strange, because when you're not cross VLAN should really happen to the wire speed, there may be a bit of a slowdown because of the extra link, but it should be almost imperceptible.

  A few things I'd like to try another cable to uplink, make sure that it's Cat5E, since Cat5 may give you some problems with a gigabit connection.  I would also try setting the port manually speed and duplex to 1000/full just to eliminate auto-negotiation as a problem.

  I would also try using a different set of ports to connect the two switches, if the problem persists.

  Just to confirm, from now on, all your devices are in the same subnet and VLAN correct?

  How much of a difference of speed are we talking about here?  Can you give some figures for PC transfer speed to the data store on the same switch and when they are on different switches?

  Hope that some of this helps,.

  Christopher Ebert - Advanced Network Support Engineer

  Cisco Small Business Support Center

  * Please note the useful messages *.

• Definition of the uplink on two SRW2042

  Hello world.

  I have two 2042 srw switches, connected to each other via a connecting cable. I have not changed the port settings everything is default. What I have to configure an uplink port for each switch to speed things up or is it done automatically by the switch? If I don't need re-branded one uplink port please provide detailed instructions. I have also noted a feature "back pressure" in respect of the management of the ports and I was wondering if that helps with an uplink port.

  One last thing. When you use the web management application under ~ statistics ~... ~ using port ~ initially it shows a few ports at 100% usage until I put the Refresh function TO update the statistics. It then changes the stats to a normal range of about 6% use. Once refresh is on ports never go more than 10% but if I disconnect and return to and check these settings initial use is 100%. This could just be buggy software?

  Thank you!

  Chris

  Hi Chris, there not a port special uplink for these products. Any port can this service (and the absence of State) need. The use of the port is probably just a caveat of software. These products are very old.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• Get links from speed negotiated CF using Cisco Powertool

  I can get the speed of the uplinks to network on the FI-s Cisco with the command

  Get-UcsFiLanCloud-Id "A" | Get-UcsUplinkPort - AdminState 'enabled ' | ForEach-Object {$_.adminspeed}

  However, there is no option to get the speed negotiated in the rising Fibre Channel on the Cisco FI - s. There is no property AdminSpeed of the output of the command below

  Get-UcsFiSanCloud-Id "A" | Get-UcsFcUplinkPort - AdminState "enabled."

  Is it possible to get the negotiated speed of the CF links? If so, please provide the command powertool.

  You can take a different approach to get them.  I said that the 'network element' cmdlet to get all the IFS, specify the 'Module' I want to get the information of (id 1 = fixed ports, code 2 = the first slot for expansion into the FI, id 3 = the second extension in the FI slot, if present), specify the FC port groups, get all of these ports and then use a select statement to filter down.  As you can see below, my FC ports are negotiated at 4gpbs.

  PS C:\ucs > Get-UcsNetworkElement | Get-UcsFiModule-Id 1 | Get-UcsPortGroup-CF to Transport | Get-UcsFiFcPort | Select dn, nmdt, admintransport, adminstate, operspeed | Format-Table

  DN Nmdt AdminTransport AdminState OperSpeed

  --                                      ----                                    --------------                          ----------                              ---------

  sys/switch-A/slot-1/switch-CF/port-31 fabric/san/A/phys-slot-1-port-31 Canadian forces active 4 Gbps

  CF sys/switch-A/slot-1/switch-CF/port-32 fabric/san/A/phys-slot-1-port-32 active 4 Gbps

  sys/switch-B/slot-1/switch-CF/port-31 fabric/san/B/phys-slot-1-port-31 Canadian forces active 4 Gbps

  CF sys/switch-B/slot-1/switch-CF/port-32 fabric/san/B/phys-slot-1-port-32 active 4 Gbps

  If you weren't aware, there is a large command called get-ucscmdletmeta.  It will help to understand how things are defined in the XML of the UCS model.

  Here are some example uses:

  Get-UcsCmdletMeta-name ucsnetworkelement-tree

  (I removed the output as it was very long, but it will give you the entire hierarchy of all classes of sup that are children of the network element, the names of XML classes for each and it suitable PowerShell verbs and names for query and manipulate classes.)

  PS C:\ucs > Get-UcsCmdletMeta-name ucsfifcport

  ClassId: FcPIo

  Name: UcsFiFcPort

  Verb: get

  PipelineClassId: PortGroup {}

  LimitScopePipelineClassId: {}

  MoMeta: Cisco.Ucs.UcsMoMeta

  -This result displays the available cmdlets to get information about an FC Port.  You can see the PipelineClassID PortGroup watch, which means the classes / substantive PoSh that are pipelineable in this category

  PS C:\ucs > Get-UcsCmdletMeta-noun ucsfifcport | Select mometa - ExpandProperty

  ClassId: FcPIo

  XmlTag: fcPIo

  RN: port-[PortId]

  MinVersion: 1.0 (1e)

  Access: input-output

  ChildClassId: {EventInst, FaultInst, EquipmentXcvr, FcErrStats...}

  AccessPrivilege: {read only}

  PropertyMeta: {AdminState, AdminTransport, ChassisId, Dn...}

  -Here, you can see the metadata Object (MO) on the Port CF class.  You can see it was added in UCSM 1.0 (1e) and needs only the 'Read only' privilege to see.

  PS C:\ucs > Get-UcsCmdletMeta-noun ucsfifcport | Select mometa - ExpandProperty | Select propertymeta - ExpandProperty | FT - AutoSize

  Name XmlAttribute Type MinVersion access restriction

  -----------                      ----           ------------   ----            ----------    ------

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction AdminState adminState System.String 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction AdminTransport adminTransport System.String 2.0(1m) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction ChassisId chassisId System.String 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  DN dn System.String 1.0 Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction (1e) ReadOnly

  Encap encap System.String 1.0 Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction (1e) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction Nmdt Nmdt System.String 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction IfRole ifRole System.String 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction IfType ifType System.String 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction Lc lc System.String 2.0(1m) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction LicGP licGP 1.4 (1i) of System.UInt64 ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction LicState licState System.String 1.4 (1i) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction settings regional locale System.String 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction Mode mode System.String 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Model Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction model System.String 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction name Name System.String 1.0 (1e) ReadWrite

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction OperSpeed operSpeed System.String 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction OperState operState System.String 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction PeerChassisId peerChassisId System.String 1.4 (1i) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction PeerDn peerDn System.String 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction PeerPortId peerPortId System.UInt32 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction PeerSlotId peerSlotId System.UInt32 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction PortId portId System.UInt32 1.0 (1e) Naming

  Revision revision 1.0 System.String Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction (1e) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction Rn rn System.String 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Series Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction series System.String 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction SlotId slotId System.UInt32 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction StateQual stateQual System.String 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction status System.String 1.0 (1e) ReadWrite

  SwitchId switchId System.String 1.0 Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction (1e) ReadOnly

  Transport Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction Transport System.String [] 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction Ts ts System.String 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction of type System.String 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction UnifiedPort unifiedPort System.String 2.0(1m) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction UsrLbl usrLbl System.String 1.4 (1i) is ReadWrite

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction seller seller System.String 1.0 (1) ReadOnly

  Wwn wwn System.String 1.0 Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction (1e) ReadOnly

  Cisco.Ucs.UcsPropertyRestriction XcvrType xcvrType System.String 1.4 (1i) ReadOnly

  -In this example I show all the properties of the class Port FC.  As you can see that operspeed is the property, you are more concerned.

  Let me know if you have more questions!

  Thank you
  Eric

• 3Com to Cisco uplink

  Does anyone know if there are specific port settings necessary for a Cisco switch to talk to a 3com switch? I have a 3com 4500 switch which will be the uplink to switch Netgear L3 end with the same exact settings as the Cisco SG300-52 I but with Cisco I can't operate at all.

  Any ideas?

  Hello Chris,

  One thing to check in this case would be auto-negotiation. Try to adjust the speed of the port and to 1000 full duplex or full 100.

  If this does not work, I would check the STP parameters. While this doesn't happen often, I saw where two switches will believe they are root bridge and refuse to pass traffic between them.

• Uplinks slow RV180

  Hello

  I have experience slower speeds on the ports that are used for the uplink on my RV180:

  -to plug my laptop directly into the RV180 that is used as a router WAN, I have beautiful wanspeeds Mbit/s approx. 98

  -When you plug into the switch 8-port SF302 - 08 p it's binding to the RV180, the maximum speed drops to 25 / 30 Mbps

  -same symptoms for a little d-link switch: when you plug in the switch of 25/30 Mbit / s, when you plug its uplink directly into my laptop, I get 95 to 100 Mbps.

  I went through the configurations, but do not know what could be the problem.

  Hello

  Note that the reports of the unit that he negotiated the speed/duplex. Also, I have experienced several scenarios in which 1 G when it is connected to 100M goes haywire. One of our fixes is to encode in hard botht he speed and duplex on TWO ports of 1 G and 100 M port, but in your case, you can't hardcode the settign 100 m because it is unmanaged

  IM positive it's trading port of the switch you have, given that it is a switch (and cheap): P

  Status > statistics the only way to check the speed of the port of port? -Yes

  PS: Have you any other switch that it supports 1 G? How about you, try another port on the RV?