3Com to Cisco uplink

Similar Questions

• Newbie connection DELL 6248 pile to pile of CISCO 3750

  Hi all

  I need to extend the desktop LAN by connecting a battery of CISCO 3750 existing a new pile of DELL 6248.

  I intend to use the fiber/combo harbour in DELL 6248 to connect to the CISCO uplink port.

  I want to use DELL port 48 but I saw there was 1/g48 and 1/xg48.  From memory, they are mutually exclusive.

  Q1.  That means I'll just set up 1/g48 and do not enter the config of 1/xg48 of the sentence?

  Q2.  To connect together the 2 batteries, devrais I defined just two ports to connect as a trunk port?  I have no experience in doing so.  FOR INFO.  We already use VLAN in piles CISCO and so the new DELL batteries must know about it.

  Any help will be very appreciated!

  Combo ports have a combined input and output of the PHY chip. Only the optical port or RJ-45 port can be used individually, but not at the same time. Any cable is connected will first use the port PHY. If the Ethernet port is used, you will configure with 1/g48, if fiber port is used then set up uses 1 / x 48.

  Yes, you are right, a network connection is what you want between the two battery. Commands on the switch PowerConnect looks like this.

  Console > activate

  Console # config

  Console (config) # interface ethernet 1/g48

  console switchport mode trunk #.

  console # permit trunk switchport vlan add 2,3,4,5

  On the PowerConnect 62xx switches, you must use general mode if you want to allow traffic from management on the switch on the PVID.  If you use the Trunk mode, you will not have the default VLAN on these ports.  The ports will only allow labeled traffic. So if the Trunk mode does not you, then switch to general mode.

  As the pile of Cisco has already VLAN on it, we must ensure to the PowerConnect switch has those same VLAN. Here is an example of creating a VLAN on the PowerConnect switch.

  Console > activate

  Console # config

  Console (config) # vlan database

  VLAN console(config-VLAN) # 2

  output console(config-VLAN) #.

  Console (config) # interface vlan 2

  Console # name Marketing

  Console # end

  Another thing you may perform is place a static route to help the traffic at the back of the battery.

  IP route {network} {mask with joker} {Next Hop-IP}

  Console # config

  Console (config) # ip route 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.0.0.2

  Console (config) # end

  I hope this info helps,

  Thank you.

• Two problems with a single ESW-540-24

  We sold an ESW 540 switch a customer to 3COM, which replaces the old equipment. This replacement will be on different faces, then connect some switches 3COM to Cisco equipment. We install rigth now and this two situations:

  • Machines virtual can´t obtain IP through DHCP addresses (using a different MAC address) when it is connected to the Cisco switch. Physical machines receive the IP addresses of the DHCP server without problem. This situation happened with 3COM switches.
  • When we interconect switch Cisco switches 3COM (do not use the uplink ports) the connection never goes up. Remembering that the 3COM switches are old we sets the speed to 100 Mbps Full Duplex, but it did not work.

  Please help me configure the Cisco switch,

  Kind regards

  Jiga.

  Hello Juan,.

  It is possible that the two problems may be related by the same question. The ESW 500 series uses a wizard smartport. If you want to test this, open a session in the ESW and under the home page, access the smartport Wizard and change the port to 'other '.

  Often the default value is set on computer, which allows only a MAC address to register on this port. This will stop most of the switches to transit traffic and in this case a second MAC address of your VM stops passing traffic.

• Is it possible to superimpose a 3cr17161-91 3Com with another Cisco layer 3 switch?

  Hello

  Nice day.  I would like to ask whether it is possible to superimpose a 3cr17161-91 3Com to a layer 3 Switch Cisco? The two will be stacked using the SFP modules available to the general public.

  Thank you

  Hi Rey, not with switches for small businesses. Small business past stack with their own range of products running the same software. Something like SGE2010 won't stack with SG500-48 as example.

  -Tom
  Please evaluate the useful messages

• Cisco 2960 and uplinks AIR-AP1041N

  Guys,

  what I'm doing wrong here?  I need to enable trunking to pass on several VLANs to my AP, but when I put the 2960 as trunk mode I lose connectivity to the AP.

  All will help it useful!

  Course AP Interface congfigs:

  interface GigabitEthernet0.210
  210 native encapsulation dot1Q
  no ip route cache
  Bridge-Group 1
  No source of bridge-Group 1-learning
  Bridge-Group 1 covering-disabled people
  end

  +++++++++++++++++++++++++++

  210 native encapsulation dot1Q
  no ip route cache
  Bridge-Group 1
  Bridge-group subscriber-loop-control 1
  Bridge-Group 1 block-unknown-source
  No source of bridge-Group 1-learning
  unicast bridge-Group 1-floods
  Bridge-Group 1 covering-disabled people
  end

  2960 new switch port config (lost connectivity to AP unless I put back to access the mode vlan210 why?)

  GigabitEthernet1/0/1 interface
  AP USTCRLW001 description
  switchport mode trunk
  SRR-queue bandwidth share 1 30 35 5
  priority queue
  MLS qos trust cos
  Auto qos trust
  end

  Add this on swicthport where AP is connected:

  GigabitEthernet1/0/1 interface
  AP USTCRLW001 description

  Switchport tunk native valn 210
  switchport mode trunk
  SRR-queue bandwidth share 1 30 35 5
  priority queue
  MLS qos trust cos
  Auto qos trust
  end

  Concerning

  Remember messages useful rates

• Port of uplink on PowerConnect 8024F went to the D State down

  Hi all

  We had a strange behavior on one of our switches PowerConnect 8024F. The uplink port of the device (connected to a port on a Cisco Catalyst 6513 10Gig) came down. The output of 'show interfaces status' looked like this:

  Port speed Duplex Neg frothing link Description
  Status of the State
  ---------  -------------------------  ------  -------  ----  ------ ------------
  TE1/0/1 cat6500-rz-1 (te11/2) 10000 Full Off D-low idle
  TE1/0/2 pc8024-ub-1 (te1, 0, 1) complete 10000 Off place Active
  TE1/0/3 pc8024-uv-1 (te1, 0, 1) complete 10000 Off place Active
  TE1/0/4 pc5500-naf02n-1 (te1, 0, 1) complete 10000 Off place Active
  TE1/0/5 pc5500-naf04n-1 (te1, 0, 1) complete 10000 Off place Active
  TE1/0/6 pc5500-naf03-1 (te1, 0, 2) 10000 Full Active Off
  TE1/0/7 pc8024-mensa-1 (te1, 0, 1) complete 10000 Off place Active
  Defekt TE1/0/8 n/a unknown inactive low Auto
  TE1/0/9 pc5500-naf03-2 (te1, 0, 1) complete 10000 Off place Active
  TE1/0/10 pc5500-naf03-3 (te1, 0, 1) complete 10000 Off place Active
  ...

  .. and so on. Firmware is 5.1.2.3. We rebooted the device and he returned to normal behavior.

  Now, can someone explain to me what the "D-Down" State means? I have not found anything in the documentation and using google not any success.

  The configuration of the port looks like the following:

  Description ' cat6500-rz-1 (te11/2).
  MTU 9216
  switchport mode general
  switchport general allowed vlan add 4-5, 14, 22-2729-33, 36, 39-41, 43 tag
  switchport general allowed vlan add 47,51-52,54-56,58-60,63-64,66,75,78-79 tag
  switchport general allowed vlan add 81, 86-90, 93-99, 107, 120, 122 tag
  switchport general allowed vlan add 124 132 - 135, 137, 140, 142-143 147-152 154 tag
  switchport general allowed vlan add 156-157, 160, 165-166, 171, 173-175 the tag
  switchport general allowed vlan add 177-178 180-181, 183, 189, 192, 195-196 the tag
  switchport general allowed vlan add 199,201,203-205 207-208 210-212 the tag
  switchport general allowed vlan add 219-222 224-225 227-233 235-244 246 tag
  switchport general allowed vlan add 248-249, 253, 256, 258-260 262-267 tag
  switchport general allowed vlan add 269-272 274-276 278-279, 282, 284, 286-288 the tag
  switchport general allowed vlan add 292 295 - 298, 323, 344, 347, 349 tag
  switchport general allowed vlan add 354,362,366,370,372,378-380 382-383 385-386 tag
  switchport general allowed vlan add 391,399,405,431,443,447 tag
  switchport general allowed vlan add 475-476, 485, 488, 511, 522, 584, 700-703 710-714 tag
  switchport general allowed vlan add 725,734,838,854-855 909 tag
  switchport general allowed vlan add 950 961 - 962, 981, 999, 1234, 1236, 2205, 2218-2220 tag
  switchport general allowed vlan add 2222,2233,2414,2417 tag
  switchport general allowed vlan add 2506-2507, 2519, 2521, 2621, 2699 tag
  Access-group PVST Mac - filter 1
  LLDP transmit tlv sys - name sys - cap
  LLDP transmit-mgmt

  The used mac filter access PVST-group is:

  Mac-extended access list filter-PVST
  refuse any 0100.0CCC. RCC 0000.0000.0000
  allow a full
  output

  Thanks for reading and suggestions!

  Robin

  It's all associated spanning-tree protocols. D to the bottom is synonymous with diagnostic downwards, which occurs if more than 15 BPDU per second is received during 3 seconds. The switch closes the port. USL worker task is bound traffic so a big change covering tree cause it's really high.

• PoE for Cisco Catalyst 2960PD-8TT-L

  Hello

  Will deploy this device for a small office. Just a quick question, a Cisco Catalyst 2960PD-8TT-l switch provides PoE on all its 8 ports or simply powered through his PoE uplink port.

  Read the URL below, but did not have much info. TIA!

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps6406/produc...

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPhone App

  Sorry John, my comment is not directed at you.  The link you posted, the content is very, the lack of a better term, misleading.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps12200/prod_models_comparison.html

  Go to this site instead.  It shows that the model you have chosen has NO PoE.  Instead, it uses the PoE of a switch upstream to turn.

• 6248 FI Cisco's UCS with Cisco catalyst 2960 connectivity

  In our environment, UCS, connects the two fabric as a Cisco Nexus 9 k switch upstream with vPC and it works well. But we need to isolate some virtual servers on the blades of the UCS on an entirely separate DMZ switch which is Cisco catalyst 2960.

  (1) so can we connect cables separate physical twinax of FI uplink ports to catalyst 2960 and connectivity to the servers in the DMZ keeping YEW to nexus connectivity as it is?

  (2) in this case, as there are 2 switches to nexus core 1 and 2 so we will require 2 cisco catalyst 2960 for disjoint such a network? or otherwise we can connect A FI and FI B to one on his 2 numbers 2960 switch. Gig SFP ports + 10?

  (3) also suggest things must be taken in charge, the best guides practice or an illustration in this context.

  The assignment is static and cannot be changed.

  location 1 - uplink 1

  slot 2 - uplink 2...

  If a property has no blade, the corresponding uplink is not used and that can not be changed!

  This dedication of uplinks of IOM is of course a lot of resources: cables, ports on FI, allowed port,...

• 2960 x FPS-L-48 uplinks and flow

  I have a pile of (4) 2960 X FPS-L-48 switches that support SFP only this will be the uplink, through fiber, to another pile of (2) 2960 FPS - L - 48 FPS X switches only.  A port channel will be created between the two batteries.  I need to know what would be the flow on the channel of port between the batteries.

  Thanks in advance.

  The potential flow will be the combined speed of the interfaces in the etherchannel.

  Keep in mind, but that, for the same conversation between two end devices etherchannel uses the same physical link across it is so important to choose the right method of load balancing.

  The Guide configuration for more details-

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/switches/LAN/catalyst2960x/software/15-2_2_e/Layer2/configuration_guide/b_layer2_1522e_2960x_cg/b_layer2_1522e_2960x_cg_chapter_0100.html#con_1275731

  Jon

• Cisco 892FSP - SPAN Ports behavior

  Dear Cisco-community,

  I'm trying to reflect an uplink port (Gi8) of my Cisco892 to a switchport (IG2). Is this a bug or a feature that I can't mirror uplinks(Gi8-9), but switchports(Gi0-7) do not work?

  Uplink does not:

  C892-(config) #monitor session 1 source interface gigabitEthernet?
  <0-9>The GigabitEthernet interface number

  C892-(config) #monitor session 1 source interface gigabitEthernet 8
  % Of incomplete orders.

  C892-(config) #monitor session 1 source interface gigabitEthernet 8?
  % Unrecognized command

  Switchport œuvres

  C892-(config) #monitor session 1 source interface gigabitEthernet 7
  C892-(config) #.

  Version:

  Cisco IOS software, software C800 (C800-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.5 (3) M3, VERSION of the SOFTWARE (fc2)
  Technical support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
  Copyright (c) 1986-2016 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
  Updated Tuesday, June 20, 16 13:57 by prod_rel_team

  Cisco C892FSP-K9 (revision 1.0) with 488524K / 35763K bytes of memory.
  10 gigabit Ethernet interfaces
  1 module of virtual private network (VPN)
  Configuration of DRAM is 32-bit wide
  255K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
  250880K bytes of ATA CompactFlash (read/write) system

  Thank you!

  I do not know the answer - but in general, you can only monitor switch ports, not routed layer 3 ports.

• Connection Cisco UCS 6120 FI directly to Cisco Catalyst 6500?

  I watch a lot of design with the Cisco UCS solution guide and everywhere it is Cisco Nexus 5000/7000 connects to the uplink ports of Cisco UCS 6120 FI with the benefits of technology to the vPC.

  How about connect Cisco UCS 6120 FI directly to 10GE ports in Cisco Catalyst 6500 (without VSS and VSS)? It is possible to design?

  If I use C6500VSS there will be port-channel of the aggregation of the UCS Nx10GE all the bandwidth?

  And what happens if I use C6500 (without VSS) - how it will be on the many links between UCS and two boxes C6500? It will be blocked by STP? A little on the other?

  Please explain to me, because we have only C6500 switches in our data center and want to test a Cisco UCS schassis.

  Yes, you can connect the 6120 s to cat6500s with or without vs. With VSS, you get a vPC as port channel where 2 links to a single 6120 can be connected to different 2 6500 s in a port LACP-channel.

  VSS is not necessary, you can connect a 10 G uplinks / 1 G of 1 or more of a 6120 at cat6500s. I you have 2 cat6500s (non - vss) and 2 uplinks by 6120, then you want to connect 1 cat6500-1 and the other to cat6500-2. I would recommend going ahead and creating a single port-channel port so that you can easily add the uplinks in the furture without interruption of service.

  Ideally, for non - vss, I would have 4 10 uplinks by 6120; 2 in a channel port cat6500-1 and 2 in a port in cat6500-2 channel

• Nexus 5548UP uplinks to the Catalyst 4510R

  I design my entirely 10g data center access layer with a pair of 5548UP switches in an EvPC and a pair of double hosted 2232PP FEX. I need to be able to uplink my pair of 5500 s up to my pair of classic 4510R aggregation switches. Each 4510R has two supervisors SUP of v, each with two ports 10g X 2. I have a trunk double 10g in a port between each 4510R channel.

  What is the ideal method for uplink to the 5500's to 4510R switches? Like many, I understand that one of the two ports of 10 g on each V Sup can be active. I should double home each 5548 to each 4510R STP and let it do its thing? I am able to do it with my SUP of V? And if so, I've always will be able to junction ports dual 10g in a port between the two switches 4510R channel? I need to maintain a large pipe between the regular for my campus traffic aggregation swithces which do not cross to the data center.

  Thank you!

  Well since you cannot cluster the 45K as a virtual switch (Cisco with new sup will start the supported VSS in the 4500 try to check which sup exactly and if you get like this will make a significant improvement in your design)

  Anyway the only method you can use currently is the traditional way, which is a function of STP (use rapid-PVST)

  each N5K use a separate link for each 45K and STP will be on links in blocking mode

  However, you could do some STP design and vlan for load sharing where you can send the vlan x more link1 and vlan y b at 45 K using cost PLEASE link

  HTH

• UCS &lt; 1.4.2b &gt;, N1K and uplink

  Hi all

  I have a UCS (cluster) connected in vPC mode to a Nexus 7010.

  UCS 4.1U1 VMware ESXi, N1K with EHM PC blade-based UCS NIC is 71KR.

  Question is what happens if the two uplink of interconnection fails? I mean maybe cut fibres or stuff like that. N1K channel will be still two active link?

  Maybe the redundancy is performed by re arping for finding a mac (i've got UCS in switch mode) address, but I'm not sure. I saw a feature in the new version for a link status tracking rising full failure handling system (how?).

  last question about redundancy... what happens if a UCS IOM resets? I have some traffic disruption?

  TNX

  Dan

  Dan,

  Just to be clear, check the following:

  -UCS in switch mode

  -Adapters M71KR

  -N1k using Mac-pinning (I guess)

  -Connectivity upstream of each FI is a VPC to a pair of N7Ks.

  In this case, the N1K has no visibility of uplinks UCS.  See all your hosts VEM are two uplinks for each host (a session each fabric interconnect.)  If one of the two uplinks fails on interconnection, traffic will be the uplink remaining on this FI re-hairpin.  If the TWO uplinks on a financial institution fail, then UCS will be down (called the link at the bottom) server links and traffic should be routed through the MEC is another uplink will the other.  You can change this behavior to follow links to Server (for local switching only) but the default action of UCSM's close links to corresponding server if there are no links available on a financial institution.   Make sense?

  Now, in the last version of N1K here (1.4) is a new feature called followed by the State of the network (NST) for use with VPC - HM (such as Mac pinning).  This feature will allow to test the connectivity of a VLAN sends a probe packet and expect to get fired on another group of liaison rising/sup.   If you have a network VLAN which SHOULD be identified, you can follow with TSN.  If the network becomes unavailable, you can choose to close the uplink and re - route traffic to an another uplink.  This is useful to detect failures beyond the first jump (which would be the interconnections) as a failure somewhere in your N7K level or beyond.

  Setup Guide: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus1000/sw/4_2_1_s_v_1_4/interface/configuration/guide/n1000v_if_5portchannel.html#wp1284321

  White paper: https://communities.Cisco.com/docs/doc-20657

  Order code: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus1000/sw/4_2_1_s_v_1_4/command/reference/n1000v_cmds_t.html#wp1295608

  For your last question about a failure/reset of the IOM, the cards corresponding to each blade will lose connectivity.  This is redundancy at the host level comes into play to reroute traffic.  In the case of your hosts N1K VEM, they would simply be re - route traffic on the access road to functional IOM of the chassis.

  Another point to consider is the M71 and M81 adapters support Fabric Failover.  He is tilting at the adapter level if there is a failure with any device between the adapter and uplink (like the IOM or FI).  Fabric failover is a configurable option adapter which re - will route traffic in Menlo ASIC adapters to the fabric in the 'other', such that the host will NOT see one of the two ports down.  Without switch fabric, a failure of a MOI or FI consider the adapter and this port would descend.  FF only adds a level of redundancy in the adapter without having to rely on any OS host grouping/failover.  M51KR, M61 KR and M72KR adapters do NOT support this feature.

  Kind regards

  Robert

• Uplink port VLAN

  Hello:

  I'm lost

  I know not if you have for example two uplink ports that belong to the same vlan, and two or more NICs for asociated to this VLAN, pinning happen dynamically

  I don't know how to set up a VLAN and assign it to a vNIC

  But I can't found how to link the uplink port to the VLAN in the UCS Manager

  Can someone help me please

  Thanks in advance

  Al

  Al,

  In the end-host mode for ethernet, when you set vlan in the UCSM the vlan is automatically assigning / configured on all uplink and port of the server.

  This is a chapter of the Guide to config:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/unified_computing/UCS/SW/GUI/config/Guide/2.0/UCSM_GUI_Configuration_Guide_2_0_chapter15.html

  However, since version 2.0, there is a feature in which you can control or confiure different VLAN on different uplink ports. This feature is characteristic L2-disjoint and here is a URL to configure:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/unified_computing/UCS/SW/GUI/config/Guide/2.0/UCSM_GUI_Configuration_Guide_2_0_chapter21.html

  I hope this helps!

  . / Afonso

• How to connect Cisco SG-300-10 L3 switch selector mode in Mode of L2 SG-300-20

  Ladies and gentlemen, please forgive me if you find my question too basic. But, I would really appreciate your help. I have two Cisco switches (SG-300-10 and SG-300-20) and I am struggling to connect with each other.

  Requirements: Switch Cisco SG-300-10 which is in needs of L3 mode to send the traffic of VLAN tagged to the switch Cisco SG-300-20, which is the mode of L2

  What I've done so now

  1 Cisco SG-300-10 (Mode L3) to the router directly connected and configured IP addresses, 192.168.0.21. The GVRP is configured for Port 5. Created the VLAN 1000 with interface IP (192.168.100.1) and configured the Port 5 trunk mode (1U, 1000 t)

  2 connected Cisco SG-300-20 (L2 Mode) to the router and set up the IP address management, 192.168.0.22. The GVRP is configured for Port 5. 1000 of VLANS created and configured the Port 5 trunk mode (1U, 1000 t)

  What does not work

  I can't access the address of management of the L2 (192.168.0.22) switch. Note that the L2 switch only on the uplink, which is to the L3 switch. Since the Port 5 also receives no marked traffic of VLAN1 (192.168.1.1), I'm assuming that he would receive the network management of VLAN1.

  Other Observations

  When I connect the cable between the two switches Port5, I expect to exchange information of VLAN, by documentation. But the lights flash at all.

  I tried other things

  I tried to connect Port 2 (1U) L3 Switch switch 2 L3 Port (1U). Yet, I can't access to the management of the L2 switch port. However, when I connect 2-Port L3 switch to my laptop, I get an IP address. That tells me that I have to solve the problem of management network pair before the switches.

  Hi Späti,

  I think the confusion is the use of the address IP address to you and how you manage your computer.

  VLAN 1 = 192.168.1.1

  VLAN 1000 = 192.168.0.21

  How I read that you connect layer 2 VLAN 1 on 192.168.0.21 switch to layer 3 of the same VLAN 1 interface to 192.168.1.1. It's confusing.

  So first thing to do is this - change layer 2 switch network 192.168.1.x IP and confirm management works on VLAN 1.

  If you want to layer 2 switch works on VLAN 1000, then you need to change the default VLAN 1000, then you can configure your uplink either as the way which you have 1u, 1000 t, or you can use 1000u.

  Your management VLAN on the layer 2 switch is VLAN 1 still unless you changed it (which did you not?)

  A next important thing for the layer 2 switch is going to be the default gateway. The switch of level 3, you need to specify the address IP of the VLAN 1000, which I think you did to 192.168.0.21/24. This 192.168.0.21 must be the default gateway for the layer 2 switch.

  Finally, the computer you connect to layer 3 switch, what that either VLAN that you choose to connect to (1 unidentified), you need to set the IP and default gateway appropriate. So if you're going to VLAN 1 then your computer is 192.168.1.x with gateway 192.168.1.1

  And for the comment extra, GVRP is a horrible Protocol and very pitiful, I don't recommend to use.