Using offsets to connect 4 2848 switches

I have four switches 2848 PC I want to connect to the best way to deliver the good flow and link redundancy. There is no VLAN involved.

I was not able to find a good setup for this example. From what I've seen, I think I want to use the offsets of 2 ports to connect the 4 switches thus:

SW1-SW2 >

SW2-SW3 >

SW3-> SW4

SW4-> SW1

I saw that it would be preferable to set the cost of path higher for the SW4-> LAG SW1 ports to avoid a loop.

But beyond that, I have no idea how set up correctly with regard to the settings in the user interface. Does anyone have an experience with which could provide me with some guidance on how to configure the GAL on each switch?

Thank you very much in advance!

-Max

Your plan sounds great. It's a logical layout of the ports.

Tags: Dell Switches

Similar Questions

  • Using Windows XP with an access switched. How can I stop the network Dialer to invite the user connect even if I checked never dial a connection in Control Panel, then apply, then OK?

    Using Windows XP with an access switched. How can I prevent the network Dialer to invite the user connect even if I checked: never establish a connection to the Control Panel, then apply, then OK? She comes right back in a few minutes for: always connect by default. Help! Control panel Connections tab doesn't really seem to apply my change to never establish a connection right back to always make the default connection. What else is there to do?

    Hi Richard,

    You did it all change hardware or software on your computer before this problem?

    You can follow this link & check if the problem persists:

    Network connections and remote access troubleshooting

    Hope the helps of information.

  • connect PowerConnect 2848 to 2824

    What is the best way to connect a PowerConnect switch 2848 to a 2824 with cooper cables a.

    I think I use 2 cables in the 47/48 and 23/24 ports, but I set up now how Dell OpenManage switch administrator.

    A SHIFT needs to connect to a different SHIFT. So now the 2824 ports 23 and 24 will be also in a SHIFT.

  • OK to mix 'of connection to the switch"and"close relay switch?

    Hi all

    I'm developing a test sequence using the card multiplexer 2527 to the track signals.  To configure the card, I use DAQmx switch functions.  In my application, I have a Subvi routine that imports the data from a spreadsheet Setup and run a loop for to set the configuration for each step (each iteration of the loop contains the channel for 2527 card information).  The topology is set on the first iteration, as well as the configuration of the path to the first string.

    My concern is this: I need to close the extra channels/relays without changing the topology or resetting the device.  In the first round, I use "connection to the switch" function to set the initial path, (ch0 to com0 for example).  Then in subsequent iterations of the loop, I use "Relay close switch" function to close the additional channels individually (for example k2).  In the end, when the measure is taken, both ch0 ch2 must be closed and routed to com0.  This implementation is so sure, or am I somehow to make the adjustments to the initial loop?

    I would like to test this with the hardware, but it is not yet available.

    Also, I realize that I could use independent topology and configure all relays individually for each step, but I hope that my approach will be easier and safer.

    Please notify.  Thank you.

    GSinMN

    Hello GSinMN,

    It's OK to mix 'of connection to the switch"and"Close relay switch"If you understand what's happening below. "Switch Connect" connects two channels by closing a path of relay between the channels, then "Close relay switch" can be used to change the State of the individual relays. If you are not careful you can mess up your connection by activating / deactivating relays that are part of the route connecting your channels.

    "Also, I realize that I could use independent topology and configure all relays individually for each step, but I hope that my approach will be easier and safer."

    I would recommend the topology independent if you want to stick with connections to channels only. http://zone.NI.com/reference/en-XX/help/375472G-01/switch/2527_independent/

    Initial connection:

    CH0-> pcom0

    pcom0plus-> icom0plus

    pcom0minus-> icom0minus

    icom0-> com0

    In each future iteration just connect to the next to pcom0 channel (which will be indirectly connect it to com0):

    CH1-> pcom0

    CH2-> pcom0

    ...

    ...

    Jarrod

  • Batchmodel: How to use the different positions of the switch-for EHR?

    Hello

    I use the Batchmodel OR three EHR. HAD the current number can be read from RunState.TestSockets.MyIndex.

    Can the lot this three EHR. What is the way - OR to use different maneuvers (OR-SwitchExec) to each dut?

    TestPlan is for example

    Configure the DMM

    Put

    Measure

    Turn off the switch.

    Switching is of course different for each Instrument.

    I really should add an if around each switching (= endless work) or is there an easy way that I'm not currently?

    If (RunState.TestSockets.MyIndex == 0)

    DUT1 switch

    Else if (RunState.TestSockets.MyIndex == 1)

    Switch to DUT2

    Else if (RunState.TestSockets.MyIndex == 2)

    Switch to DUT3

    on the other

    end

    Thanks for the tips

    Best regards

    OO

    I wouldn't use either of the prerequisite or if things... It's too much work and I'm lazy.

    I would just use the built in step of switching:

    http://zone.NI.com/reference/en-XX/help/370404G-01/NISE/TestStand/

    Name your routegroups in Switch Executive to match your shooting numbers.

    For example, in the process (s) to connect: box can have the following expression:

    "SigGenToUUT" + Str (RunState.TestSocket.MyIndex)

    And have a road connecting the signal generator to the UUT named SigGenToUUT0.  It would be for USE in socket 0.

    Just a thought!

  • EA6500 only shows no device connected to the switch of working group 5 ports

    I just replaced a defective Linksys e4200 with an ea6500.  After assistance by phone, I got to the top and work, but only one computer on my LAN is not displayed.

    I connected an 8 port 10/100 switch Linksys my 4200, and my wife's computer was connected to that.   The computer displays the IP as 192.168.1.133 and it is connected to the internet with my router again.  But the ea6500 does not show a device with the ip address.  Instead, he shows what he calls a network with the IP 192.168.1.130 device.

    How can I see the devices connected to the switch 5 ports and determine which ip addresses, they have been assigned?

    I use a switch with my network with a router EA and it shows the devices correctly. Turn off the computer which does not appear in the list of devices and check to see if any device will appear as offline adter who. Remove from the list of devices, and then restart the router. Once the router is ready, open the page of the router again and turn on the computer and check if it will be detected correctly. I hope this helps.

    Edit: Check and make sure you have the latest firmware loaded. Otherwise, update the firmware and do a reset after the update of the firmware. Check your list of devices after that.

  • How to connect two network switches Force10 S4810P

    Hello world

    We just bought two S4810P Force10 network switches and we want to install on two adjacent brackets. They will be used to interconnect computing and NAS storage, installed in two baskets serving mainly local connections.

    We intend to use ports QSFP + to connect the two switches, and I have two questions.

    1. hardware configuration: what are the best transceivers and cables to use in this case?

    2. configuration of the software: should we use stacking or virtual link trunking? the information I've read so far does not give me a definitive answer.

    Thank you very much in advance for your help!

    The server room is already has some inside wiring? If so it be a transceiver that will percolate pre-existing cables. There are also some direct attach cables ranging from 0.5 m to 50 m. Here is an example of a cable direct attach: http://dell.to/23huDl7

    the best course of action would be to contact your sales representative and let them know what your needs are. They can get you city for right connection hardware.

    the VLT and stack the two have the same goal of redundancy, but go about it in different methods with different warnings warning for both. In both scenarios, the redundancy is dependent on each device connection linking the two switches. If you do not do this, then it may be better to let the independent switches. Here is a good blog that compares the VLT and stacking.

    http://bit.LY/1J8nI1Y

    I hope this helps.

  • connect the m6220 switches stacked to existing Lan infrastructure

    I need to connect two powerconnect M6220 to LAN infrastructure existing.

    The switch of two are configured in the stack.

    Which is the best way to uplink the new switch to the other two powerconnect 5548.

    The old switch are not stacked and bound together by two 10GB Ethernet cable (one of the links is disabled).

    I need to implement the network tolerant to failures, maybe I need to configure the tree covering weight on the two links of 10 GB.

    I use Spanning tree to configure the uplink between the old and the new, too?

    Is there a better alternative? There is another way to prevent the loop network?

    Thanks, Francesco

    You have a few options.

    1. you can simply connect the cables between the M6220 switch stack and the 5548.  Set up a trunk connection which allows for VLAN needed overall.  Tree covering weight until it is enabled on the switch and not off on specific ports connecting the default switches prevent loops and allow the most profitable link to be active, leaving the second connection as an alternative link in a blocking state.

    2. you can configure LAG (aggregation of links).  This is where you configure the individual physical ports in a virtual port channel.  This indicates a covering tree to treat multiple physical ports as a single link aggregated to the other switch.  You will need to have the port at each end of the connection channel mapping. (On each switch).  This allows the same speed but more flow.  To move traffic more.

  • Tracer Cisco packet 6 / How to connect 3 multilayer switches

    I wan't to ping of 'PC' in the right (DIRECTION FES) for PC on the left (DIRECTION KENITRA) but when I ping fails, I tried to connect 'Multilayer Switch3' and "Multicouche Switch0" but I failed, I used the following commands:

    Multi-layer router RIP Switch3 (config) #.

    Multilayer Switch3 (config) #network 10.0.0.0

    Multilayer Switch3 (config) #network 192.168.30.0

    and

    Multilayer Switch3 (config) # router eigrp 1000

    Multilayer Switch3 (config) #network 10.0.0.0

    Multilayer Switch3 (config) #network 192.168.30.0

    but without any effect.

    Please, help me succefuly ping and connect all the succefuly of networks.

    Khalil

    You must watch your switching configurations and go through them carefully.

    Just looking at them, I can see that EIGRP configurations are wrong.

    On each switch, you should have statements of network for connected networks, not for networks that are not directly connected.

    If you go through them again and refer to your diagram, you should be able to see that you have set up statements of network under EIGRP for networks that are connected to other switches.

    This is why EIGRP is not coming.

    Jon

  • When I use HDMI to connect my macbook to the TV - it lights for a few seconds, then disappears?

    When I use HDMI to connect my macbook to the TV - it lights for a few seconds, then disappears?

    I tried all 4 HDMI ports

    my computer is 2013 macbook pro retina - tv is a 1 year old samsung

    Try this support article > use your TV as a monitor

    If you have an Apple TV, you can use AirPlay to the screen of your Mac on the TV via HDMI.

  • I can't use FF to connect to simple Web pages. A lot of pages javascript seems to be disabled. have deleted the C:/p/moz FF x 86 files and reinstalled. No change.

    I am running Firefox 24.0 with Windows 7. I can't use Firefox to connect to simple Web pages. When I try to use all the features of sites Web which include cookies of the browser does.
    Many functions JavaScript seems to be disabled, that many parts of Web pages do not work. I went to: Tools > Options and checked all the settings for something suspicious, it looked good.

    This happened a few months at least. I tried to remove Firefox yesterday, by deleting this file: C:\Program Files (x 86) \Mozilla Firefox and then ran the Mozilla Firefox
    Installer and it did reinstall correctly, but the problem persists.

    I only use Firefox for browsing the web. I also use other browsers with my install W7: I use Opera, IE and chrome, they all work great. The only extensions that I use are the Manager session 0.8.0.8 and selector Group tab 0.1. My Silverlight, Shockwave, Acrobat, and Flash Player are all up to date. I use the default theme. I use all services.

    I don't know what else to do. Help, please.

    Alright. I checked the stuff you guys recommended on the preferences and profiles. I didn't know a lot of this stuff, I do now, that's really useful, thanks!

    I checked the help > information on troubleshooting and I went there to reset Firefox. Which caused the browser working properly again, so I guess I was wrong earlier when I said that it "broke the program."

    I looked at the data I'm in sync. I started the browser synchronization again. This time I unchecked individual boxes, starting with preferences, then I synchronized and looked to see if the problem is back. It turns out that what he was doing was data "bookmarks".

    I guess that the only thing left to do is clear my sync data.

  • I updated firefox and you have a question, if I allowed firefox to use my internet connection, I clicked on No - by mistake - and now firefox is locked, it can not use it at all.

    I got a message that he did not have an update for firefox. When the update has been done, I have a question if I would allow firefox to use my internet connection. By mistake I clicked No, and which showed that Firefox is now locked. I can't go out on the internet at all with her. When I write in links or try to write words for the search nothing happens.
    Tried to download firefox and reinstall but it is still blocked.
    I use internet explorer, so the problem is not in the Internet.
    How do I unlock Firefox so I can use it again?

    Your firewall block access Firefox, read here for more information on how to enable the connection again depending on your firewall:

    https://support.Mozilla.com/en-us/KB/firewalls

    Thank you

    Please check 'Resolved' the answer really solve the problem, to help others with a similar problem.

  • Is there a file management utility availabe for transfer files from Iphone to PC using the USB connection or wifi? Thank you

    Is there a file management utility availabe for transfer (image) files from Iphone to PC using the USB connection or wifi? Thank you

    You should be able to synchronize with a compatible Picture Manager, but you can also see the TouchCopy application.

  • Can I use my printer manually instead of using the wireless connection?

    Can I use my printer manually instead of using the wireless connection?

    cbg_37 wrote:

    It is an OfficeJet Pro 8610.

    Hello

    It has a print USB 2.0 port, so you can use the printer USB cable to connect it to your computer. This cable may be not in the box, please check if you first buy one (around $5 to $ 10). It is similar to:

    Kind regards.

  • I want to use my network connection to neighbors through his router on my laptop

    I want to use my network connection to neighbors through his router on my laptop. He gave me the info to do it, I do not know where to enter it or where to go. HELP PLEASE!

    Hello

    What operating system do you work?

    You can refer to:

    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/view-connect-available-wireless-networks#1TC=Windows-7

Maybe you are looking for