VCS with a VCSE cluster

Similar Questions

• Integration of control VCS with VCS ExpressWay

  Hi all

  I had to submit the question to your experience and knowledge:

  We will integrate a control of VCS with OS X7.1 onboard with an EpressWay VCS with X7.0.1instead.

  Is it going to work or will we need to have corresponding versions of OS/FW?

  If the latter, is possible to downgrade VCS - C OS without the need to have a maintenance and support contract?

  Thank you

  Andrea

  Hello Andrea,

  In my opinion, it should work. Only thing you should take care of bugs that could be corrected in the version of x7.1.

  If you want to downgrade the VCS - c software to x7.0.1, you will be able to do as the key to unblocking would be same for the x version 7 software.

  in my opinion it would be better if you upgrade the operating system version on vcs-Highway to x7.1 as the key to unblocking would be same and just download the software from the site and cisco unity upgrade.

  Thank you

  Alok

• Error IBR with Webcenter content cluster

  Hi all.

  I am using oracle webcenter content 11.1.1.6.

  When I configure single IBR with content unique webcenter work but error with webcenter content cluster.

  It generate the image but image not found link and nolog access.  I don't know why.

  Thank you all.

  Hoan

  I solved my problem. Just change the file format of ImageThumbnail to the design of digital media. It's in my tie.

  But I want to configure failover for the BOVINE infectious rhinotraecheitis servers managed

  I read the note 1209496.1.

  I tested 2 ibr managed server may not run on a machine.

  Following this remark ibr cannot cluter-active but may switch.

  UCM_server can configure the cluster. After that UCM_server can configure provider with IBR 2 managed servers in 2 machines.

  If IBR first managed down, UCM server can connect to the second server managed IBR to work.

  Am I right?

  Hoan

• Integration of VCS with Lync (impossible to decode the SDP)

  Hello

  This is my first post here, and I would like to know your opinion on the issue below:

  Scenario: VCS running 7.1 with B2BUA and SIP using TLS connection. Microsoft Lync 2010 (a VET), no user FindMe, just static road.

  SIP TLS connection is active on both sides. Managed to call from customer end points Lync, Lync unfortunally endpoints customers I get a response "400 Unable to decode SDP." The static route is configured to send calls to port 5061 on VCS.

  Any ideas?

  Thank you.

  Kind regards.

  Didler,

  the static route to Lync to VCS should not point to port 5061 when you use B2BUA, but rather the B2BUA listening port incoming connections from OCS/Lync, which is default 65072.

  This is described in detail on pages 67 and 68 of the OCS/Lync for X7.1 deployment guide.

  Hope this helps,

  Andreas

• VCS with Mu - Law when the SIP media processing

  Hi guys, I have a very specific behavior.

  A customer has problems to integrate a VCS Starter Pack X7.2.1 with an Alcatel PBX with a SIP trunk.

  The problem is:

  This PBX is in Europe, so that it uses A - Law (they can´t change this).

  When a dial an extension using H323 as protocol endpoint, I can force the Protocol G711 A - law on the trunk SIP (generating SDP interworked), but when that point of termination (C20 runningn TC5.1.4) using SIP, the PBX Don t accept a p2p support. It must be mandated by the VCS.

  If force us the media through the VCS (by using encryption B2BUA or SIP Lock Mode), the codec negotiated btw VCS and endpoint to the title of this first step is G711 Mu - Law (PCMU) and the accepted PBX codec is PCMA, causing a shift and a loud noise in the call.

  No idea if we can force or configure VCS to use G711a as the Protocol when a SIP - SIP call with stream media through VCS?

  PS: I think that this isn't a problem in the United States, because they use the Mu - Law encoding.

  Thank you

  Can you put a cap set the filter on the endpoint at all?

  xConfiguration Experimental CapsetFilter: "G.711mu"
  
  

  Thank you

  Guy

• VCS with TMS Cisco compatibility

  Hi guys,.

  one of our clients runs on VCS x5.2, they plan to upgrade the VCS to X7.2.4 due to packet loss.

  could someone answer my query 2 below...

  1. make VCS 7.2.4 compatibility with TMS 13.2.2 with legacy agent? or x7.2.4 VCS support only the TMSPE?

  2. I saw a doc of Cisco, claiming that it will go to vcs x6.1 before going directly from 5.2 7.2.4. is it mandatory?

  Cordially Vigeesh

  The answers to your questions are in the X7.2.4 release notes:

  https://www.Cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/TD/docs/Telepresence/infrastructure/VC...

  1.) Yes, no

  Yes 2).

• Battle of VSAN (2 node with node witness Cluster) cannot write to VSAN

  I'm having problems with my Cluster active VSAN and can't seem to write in the data store or migrate a virtual machine to download whatever it is him. When I try a vMotion VM over the VSAN DS I get an error "file impossible creation a full operation, an unknown error occurred."

  Here is my layout,

  Two Clusters with the node of witness, one with 2 nodes

  Each host has 2 discs with a Cache and running as FLASH capacity and disk HARD hybrid Type. Field of the fault, I have a witness preferred and secondary each host is divided.

  Here are the best, I got a work around, if I change the host of fd perfered and when updating the domain fault I can during this brief moment write to the data store. That's how I'm migration of VMs for the moment.

  Any suggestions?

  Thank you

  VSAN Checkup shows that everything works well? My guess is that your 2 hosts have problems with communication with the node of witness or vice versa.

  Try to modify the VSAN storage policy to enable ForceProvisioning as a test, if it works, the problem is probably problem of config/route network communicates with the witness.

• Environment of horizon 6.1 with Vsphere 6 cluster, Dungeon of Win7 64 desktop computers to crash/restart

  I manage about 7 different environments from view of the Horizon for customers, others on prem and some in our hosted environment.  I had no problem (recently) with any of them and some of them exist on this same environment Vsphere, and another is on the same version of the view of the Horizon.  The only noticeable difference is I think environmental issues are on version 7 of material and the environment of the problem is 11.  The problems are spend on all servers in the cluster, and the cluster includes other view environments, using the same storage array in certain circumstances to work.

  So, the problem is that these Win 7 64 desktop computers are crashing or restart, and I can't understand log exactly which.  I don't see "WinBSOD" in the newspaper.  Users report the problem after walking away for a few minutes, and they come back to a black screen, move their mouse to try to wake up and usually lose the connection.  It seems that maybe there is a problem with video, but I can't really know what or why.  They have all 35 MB of video memory, and most of the users are running 1920 x 1080 or lower on a single monitor, so this should be more than enough.

  A journal of one of the machines having the issue is attached.  Someone at - it a preview?  able to point me in the right direction?  I generally understand such things on my own, but this one has me pretty puzzled.

  Thank you

  We have the same number, even if it is not widespread. VMware Support made us to this http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=2117244 KB

  I still have to make the change, but I thought this might help you.

• Problem with Vmware Ha cluster

  Good dekdak all

  I have a problem with vsphere 4.

  Today, I have to change the ip of the host 3 addreeses and a virtual Center.

  I do these things with your help like that, connect on VC disconnect all hosts and remove.

  Vcenter stopover services change beginning vcenter intellectual property services.

  Change the Ip addresses of the hosts, but now I get this error when I try to connect to the host to vcenter.

  Unable to connect ha agent on this host,.

  Please help me because Icannot create the cluster now, I don't know why

  Hi Patrizio,.

  Make sure your vCenter and all ESXs records are updated in your DNS infrastructure (or files hosts...).

  Good luck.

  Concerning

  Franck

• Integration of 11g OAM with Kerberos on cluster with virtualhost load balancing

  Hello!
  I need to make an integration of Kerberos with OAM.
  I find the rest of OAM 11 g notes: Configuration Ondaaah HA Clusters [1365888.1 ID] (https://support.oracle.com/epmos/faces/ui/km/SearchDocDisplay.jspx?_afrLoop=223640518878014 & type = DOCUMENT & id = 1365888.1 & displayIndex = 1 & _afrWindowMode = 0 & _adf.ctrl - State = 14ehvbh4z2_61).
  
  "In environment clustered OAM, OAM Principal for Ondaaah must be the same on all levels, i.e. balancing virtualhost to the OAM cluster."
  That's why each managed server OAM will reference the same keytab file generated for main HTTP / < virtualhost.domain >, and the keytab file will be in the same location on all OAM servers managed.
  For example: ${DOMAIN_HOME} /domains/$ {DomainName} / config/fmwconfig/oam / < the keytab file name >.
  
  After copying the file keytab to the same directory on all OAM manages the server machines, proceed to configuring the Kerberos authentication module in the Console of Administration of OAM (/ oamconsole).
  The AdminServer ensure that the config.xml file - oam on all levels of OAM managed server in the cluster is updated with this configuration."
  
  The question is; When I create oam.keytab with the following command, what is the name of the server I'll have to order? Node1 and Node2 (balanced) VirtualHost?
  
  Ktpass - princ HTTP / < servername > @domaine - pass XXXXXXX mapuser domain\user - on oam.keytab.
  
  Thanks in advance and best regards!
  
  PS: Sorry if my English is not clear.

  David,

  Your main name must match the URL of SSO LB. (ie: sso.mycomany.com)

  Ktpass - princ HTTP/sso.mycomany.com@DOMAIN-passer XXXXXXX mapuser domain\user - on oam.keytab.

  Also make sure that sso.mycomany.com has a reverse DNS configured correctly.
  You can check using the dig command

  Ping sso.mycomany.com
  Regardless of the ip address
  dig - x

  Check in the reverse DNS it takes 1 form.

  ;; SECTION OF THE ANSWER:
  1.1.1.1.in - addr.arpa. 3600 IN PTR sso.mycomany.com.

  Let me know if you have any other questions.

  Thank you
  Saurabh

• two or more frame with fabric in cluster interconnect

  Hi experts

  I just want to confirm the proper way to connect two or more UCS 5108 chassis with a pair of interconnect fabric 6120xp clustered.

  I though that they should connect like this: the tissue Extender first of all chassis must connect on interconnection fabric A and second all chassis tissue Expander connects to the fabric interconnect b. as on the diagram here: https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-5949

  However, I saw someone did: 1 chassis connects as I went through although above but for the 2 chassis, fabric Extender 1 connect to the B interconnection fabric and fabric fabric Extender 2 interconnect a. -

  can someone tell me which is appropriate/best practices? no reason the second chassis enjambment?

  Thank you

  Ming

  Ming, you must fix this implementation.  It's like ghostbusters: do not exceed the streams!

  Always systematically cable chassis fex to interconnection fabric.  Most common installation:

  Interconnection of fabric (primary) is connected to the hand (looking for the rear of the chassis) left FEX

  Fabric interconnect (subordinate) B is hand-bound straight FEX.

  Why?  You will get errors (can't be bothered them up!) and if you move a Service profile to a chassis to another chassis that is wired differently, it will not work (CNAs wired to different financial institutions, where the living are active / inactive = bad).

  PS - to change this, if I were you, I would like to turn off the entire system - fabric interconnects, chassis, everything.  then re-cable.  then turn on the fabric of the interconnections and chassis and check configurations are ok.

• Configure my VCSC with VCSe on the public IP address

  Hi guys,.

  I have a session of control VCS under my company Private IP and I my client on public IP VCSe.

  It will be possible to configure my VCSC with the VCSe after the configuration of the areas?

  The ports must be opened by my team of firewall in this scenario?

  Anything else I need to keep in mind.

  For the record, it is only for the objective test.

  You will appreciate any response.

  Thank you

  Saurabh

  > Then, practically there is no as such risk, and my client can use the public IP address on VCSe

  > without going to double network Option key. (which is used to secure more VCSe).

  Cisco highly recommend VCS-E deploy under the DMZ but it's true, too, many customers deploy VCS - E on public network directly.

  Please visit https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2154738?tstart=150 for more information security VCS.

  Next version of the plan to be supported VCS X7.2 software build - in the characteristic basic firewall, which allows configuration to allow/deny list based on the IP / port / protocol which should contribute to better security level or even VCS-E deployment on the public network directly.

  > So, I'll ask my client just buy a public IP address, that's all, and we are ready to go?

  A public IP will demand on VCS Expressway, VCS control can be use the NAT address glow (IE share internet access of the network of offices).

  You must also SRV DNS management (if small deployment probably better to use the external DNS service, there are a lot of company provide a service the two service also responsible DNS hosting and as free service).

• VCS on multiple cluster

  Hello Experts! I'm hoping to get help on the SCV Clustering... I know that with the VCS X7.1, it says that VCS clustering requires a configuration with the same cluster name on all VCS, same pre-shared key for cluster on all VCS communication and same feature option keys (i.e. provisioning, findme, H.323 - SIP gateway, etc.).

  That said, can someone please confirm if a peer of VCS can participate in a single Cluster VCS? Or - is it possible to have a single VCS to join two or more different VCS groups? If so, can you point me to the right docs?

  Hi Rose,

  You can not only VCS join 2 different groups.

  To join a cluster, you must have some common paramtere through peers as FULL, pre-shared key domain name.

  VCS only single entry to these settings so I don't see a layout in which you can not enter the FULL domain and pre-shared mupltiple.

  Hope this helps

  Kind regards
  Sagar

• VCS Cluster question

  Hey all,.

  We have two VCS highways in a cluster.  A VCS is on a tour of the Internet and the other is on a circuit separate from another provider.  The Internet provider for one sucks VCS for video, its only necessary as a backup circuit.  I put this VCS in maintenance mode until the circuit feeding the other VCS fails?  In this way, all records are forced to the VCS with the best circuit of the Internet.

  If a VCS is in maintenance mode, will always be synchronized across the cluster?

  Thank you

  Justin Ferello
  Technical Support Specialist
  KBZ, a Cisco authorized dealer
  http://www.KBZ.com
  e/v: [email protected] / * /

  Justin-

  I went forward a sale of our peers CV in maintenance mode earlier today to work around a problem, and it is always on at this point.  Check the page clustering on the mask of the VCS, it shows that the peer is still active.  Having the status of the replication of successful, even up to present any minute.  It seems that everything is going well, but like you if it would be good to hear from someone official.  Even if we force a counterpart basically be in a passive state until get us out maintenance ourselves to become active.  Unlike a cluster of 6 peers where the last two automatically become active when one of the 4 main counterparts breaks down.

• MX200 (TC6.2) cannot save with SIP TLS for control of VCS

  Hi all

  I just got a brand-new MX200 in our laboratories.

  We will evaluate at the moment the overall upgrade to the version sw TC6.2.

  The MX200 was delivered with TC6.1.1.7. Check in the control of VCS with SIP TLS works without any problem at all.

  VCS - C eventlog:

  "26 aout 14:16: 47 tvcs: event ="Accepted for registration"Service ="SIP"Src - ip ="172.18.93.88"Src-port ="5061"Protocol ="TLS"AOR ="[email protected] / * /"Contact =" sip:[email protected]/ * /: 5061; transport\ = tls"duration ="60"Level = '1' elements UTCTime = '2013-08-26 14:16:47, 833'

  "26 aout 14:16: 47 tvcs: event ="The requested record"Service ="SIP"Src - ip ="172.18.93.88"Src-port ="5061"Protocol ="TLS"AOR ="[email protected] / * /"Contact =" sip:[email protected]/ * /: 5061; transport\ = tls"duration ="60"Level = '1' elements UTCTime = '2013-08-26 14:16:47, 831'

  After registration TC6.2 update fails.

  The 26 aout 14:36: 26 tvcs: event = "Rejected registration" reason = "Received no authenticated source" Service = "SIP" Src - ip = "172.18.93.88" Src-port = "36545" Protocol = "TLS" AOR = "sip:DOMAIN.com" Contact ="<>[email protected]"/ * /: 5061;transport\=tls>;+sip.instance\= '"" duration = '3600' level = '1' elements UTCTime = "2013-08-26 14:36:26, 481"

  26 aout 14:36: 26 tvcs: event = "The requested record" Service = "SIP" Src - ip = "172.18.93.88" Src-port = "36545" Protocol = "TLS" AOR = "sip:DOMAIN.com" Contact ="<>[email protected]"/ * /: 5061;transport\=tls>;+sip.instance\= '"" duration = '3600' level = '1' elements UTCTime = "2013-08-26 14:36:26, 481"

  As far as I can see there's something doesn't quite work with the protocoll in relationship with the SIP URI (AOR). Miss me the prefix "[email protected] / * /"

  All other systems (profile, ex, sx) work properly with TC6.2.

  Anyone have an idea?

  Hi adil,.

  Since the inscription "AOR" is only said AOR = "sip:DOMAIN.com"

  I belive you must have some sort of rule research on the VCS the sip domain and pointing to the crossing or a nearby area and the policy setting must be "audit powers.

  and since there is no name of user and password available the record attempts will fail with the message "from source" unauthenticated

  did you recently create transformations on the VCS? also, check your configuration of endpoint.

  You can create a rule to send this registration through local area message passing in turn to the subzone to registration. Please note the subfield must be set on "treat as authenticated" If you do not use authentication.

  Rgds

  Alok