Vertical shift in the management interface?

Similar Questions

• How do the management interface of configuration of an ethernet interface?

  We have an ASA 5540 requiring a LAN port for failover. And the left side of the interface available only the management port. How do the management interface of configuration of an ethernet interface?

  You can disable the mode of management only on this interface to make as regualr routable port and use for other purposes, including the purposes of failover LAN database.

  On the management interface - 5510 but applies generally to the management0/0, itself including 5540

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa80/configuration/guide/intParam.html#wp1057800

  Basic LAN failover configuration

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa80/configuration/guide/intParam.html#wp1057800

  Rgds

  -Jorge

• Use of the Trunk Ports (Cisco) on the management interface

  Hi all

  Background:

  We are in the process of consolidation of 2 farms of esx servers and will end up with 10 guests in a single cluster. Guests come from 2 VLAN separate (say 10 of VLANs and vlan 20). A test I took one of the hosts of HA/DRS and tests with it. For HA and DRS to work efficiently and properly in common all resources, we all want vm to leave both VLAN access to move to any host in the cluster.

  The test:

  My single host mentioned above, I created 2 groups of ports on a vswitch, vlan10 tag and with vlan20, I deployed a VM and tried on the two IP address ranges. It worked (with the correct settings of defined IP by VLAN) but as soon as we resources shared the port used by the management of network vmkernel port we lost the connection to the HOST from a management perspective. What the question is that it is possible to connect the management network a trunk port? We have 2 network interfaces connected to the vSwitch and both used for the VM traffic as well as management traffic. That's how they are currently implemented except that the switch port is on a VLAN-specific rather than shared resources.

  Thank you very much

  Chris

  Hi Chris

  Yes, the network management also accepts the vlan tagging/trunking.

  Just add the number VLAN on the Portgroup.

  Maybe you can do a printscreen with the current configuration?

• ESXi 5, link group, VLAN and the Management Interface

  Greetings-

  I suspect that the answer to my question is: 'Buy an another NIC Intel' but here goes:

  I have a server ESXi here with 2 Intel GigE NIC, connected to the same switch managed ahead of Cisco.  A (vmnic0) NETWORK card is connected to the VLAN 200 while the second (vmnic1) is connected to the VLAN 300.  Ports on the Cisco are defined to access mode.

  Internally, the server ESXi, vmnic0 is connected to the 'public' vSwitch, while vmnic1 is connected to the "private" vSwitch

  I also updated the ESXi management IP 24 even as private vSwitch.  This is the key, I suspect.

  I tried to combine the two GigE interfaces in a connection unique 2xGigE and trunk two VLAN 200 and 300 through it.  After struggling through the menus on the ESXi console INTERFACE, I managed to get the IP management save and who responded and was able to connect to the server with the vSphere client.  I did it in X'ing the vmnic0 and vmnic1 in the configuration interface, then setting VLAN 300 in the configuration of VLANS.  But I could not the team/bundle correctly in the two vSwitches vmnic interfaces.  I could never attach a vmnic to one of the switches.

  Can I do all this with only 2 GigE interfaces and maintain access to IP management?

  SWITCH CISCO < == trunk w / VLAN 200 300 2xGigE == > SERVER ESXI

  VLAN 200 is a 28 audience

  VLAN 300 is a private 24 (for example: 192.168.100.0/24)

  IP management is 192.168.100.2

  I need to create a third VLAN for the management IP address and move?  If I master, say, VLAN 400 down to the ESXi server, use another block 192.168 for his IP address, I'll be able to take the vmnic0 and vmnic1 and team on the TWO vSwitches?

  Always follow me? ... :-)  If I can clarify this, by all means ask.  I apologize for the sort of random babbling here.  Thank you!

  JAS

  jasonvp wrote:

  Rickard Nobel wrote:

  You can not have your two vmnic (physical NIC ports) connected to two vSwitches and at the same time have a "grouping". You need to delete one of the vSwitches and recreate the vSwitch remaining trade. VLAN will insulate them even different networks.

  Thanks for the pointers; I finally had the opportunity to try this out and it works as expected.  I EF you the 'right answer' but apparently the forum won't let me since you already have an answer of "useful".

  Nice that you got it working! When you perform the actual configuration with vSwitch Hash IP and physical switch LAG config, it might be a little difficult to do things in the correct order to not lose connection to the ESXi host.

  You can select this message if you wish.

• have a cisco CISCO2106 wireless controller. I have configured mangement interface and AP-Manager in this. I can now connect to WLC, through the management interface, but the problem is AP-manager interface to SURVEY not so AP aren't the assoc

  

  What do you mean that's not upward? Can you please upload config and debug? What output do you see on the side of the AP using the console port?

  What is the method of discovery?

• Dynamic management of the mobile AP management interface to another dynamic interface (WLC 2504)

  Situation/configuration is the following:

  -2504 WLC (8.1.131) with a total of 22 AP is connected.

  -Several WLAN active each with its own interface (dynamic)

  -L' (static) management interface is the option "Activate the dynamic management of AP" enabled.

  -The four physical interfaces of the WLC remain TROLLING configured.

  What is the problem:

  In the current configuration, the management interface is in the same vlan as the AP we now want to move the management interface to a different VLAN, but keep the AP in the vlan current. The idea is to move the management interface to its new vlan and disable "enable dynamic management of AP". Then, create a new interface (dynamic) in the same vlan as of AP and select 'turn on the dynamic management of AP' on this interface. Configure it as it is no problem but is does not work. The AP will record is no longer with the WLC.

  Is there something I may be missing why this does not work?

  Richard.

  Yes, that's the gist of it.

  I recommend always making a capture packets if only just for educational purposes and to see how this works in action. I found it interesting when I did in the lab here.

• The ASA Independand IP management interface

  Hello

  I have a pair of ASA 5510 running like a pair of failover 8.4.

  Currently, we have 3 interfaces prod and are also using the management interface in the form of a group management interface.

  AS I joined the two using failover, the interface of management on the second ASA took the IP address of the first. Is it possible to exclude this HA interface so that we can manage, via IP, each device independently? The main reason for this is that two devices sit in different DC so we have another out-of-band to each site network.

  Thank you

  Anthony

  Hello

  I have not personally at least knows of anyway to do this because the devices share the same configuration and switch interface IP address depending on which device is active in the pair.

  To my knowledge each physical interface that is not configured for subinterfaces should be part of the default recovery. I guess in your case, even if it is not accomplish what you're after, you should probably configure "without monitor-interface", if not, to my knowledge, it might affect the State of failover?

  I don't know if there really is a way to make it work as you want. I think Cisco assumes that the management interface is like any other data interface in failover and it requires connectivity between sites where pairs of ASA.

  I guess it would be better if the Console port has been used for this purpose and you had a separate device you can remote access to the Console of the machine you want.

  If you want to send commands to the other ASA the failover and link then it is possible

  For example, you can connect to an ASA and execute commands from the failover link

  exec failover partner

  But again, I don't know if this will be of any help in your situation.

  -Jouni

• UCS management interface - B series

  Management of the UCS of series B can then passage to uplink ports / Server interconnection fabric and not on the Management Interface of the FI? As in the C series there is a choice in the MMIC where management requires ports LAN (LOM)

  Yes, since IF you have a connection of the mgmt0 port - is for the FI management and KVM blade, etc. (e.g. the OOB management).

  On the IF configure you uplink profits that are used to carry network traffic on the blades.

  On the C series if you configure the port MMIC to be mode shared-LOM then yes all traffic management and the path of data will be done by the same ports LOM. If you choose the dediacted port then you must use the MMIC port on the C series for the management and LOM for the data.

  . / Afonso

• Cannot create the IPv4 Interface on switch SG300-20 entries

  It is a brand new switch, mode of L3, and I am connected to port 5. By default, all ports are VLAN1 (management) defined as the PVID and are defined in trunk mode. I can connect without problems, and nothing else is connected to the switch.

  I did a master reset (via the web interface and button reset for 20 seconds) several times, and every time I try to assign an IP address to a VIRTUAL LAN on the page located at IP Configuration > GPI and Interfaces > Interface IPv4, I lose connectivity to the switch and it should be reset.

  I make no changes to the VLAN1 (management) or the port I am logged in, but the problem persists. My switch is bad? Thanks in advance.

  Hello Terry,

  It is done, your switch has several types of IP addresses,

  -static IP address (you set this)

  -dhcp (a server or router that sets)

  -default (if neither of the other is defined) 192.168.1.254.

  If the sg300 or 500 device has the default IP address and add another IP interface (on a virtual LAN or on a port), it will determine that static or dhcp is the management interface and the address 'by default' won't work any more.

  The workaround for this is:

  When you configure layer 3 routing on a sg300 or switch 500, once the switch is in mode l3, you must:

  1 - give each VLAN interface a static IP from vlan1.  This can be the same as the default 192.168.1.254, but I recommend to choose another address where you decide to add another switch in the future.

  2 - before you set an IP address on the new VLAN, assign a port of access to the new vlan (so you can move your desktop to this vlan) management if necessary.  management of VLAN--> belonging to a vlan port.  Once you assign the ip address and your management interface goes far, move your pc to port on the new virtual local network, give it a static and reconnect to the new IP address.

  3. use the cable from the console and CLI to configure the interface vlan, as the console port does not go down, or lose connectivity when configuring a VLAN.

  Hope this helps,

  Dan

• WLC use Management Interface &amp; more get started Questions

  Hello

  I am yet to implement Wireless LAN in one seat of our customers. There are 40 x 1130AG LWAPP AP and WLC 4404 with ACS 4.x for authentication of Wireless Clients attempting to access the LAN.

  For the WLC to connect to the Dual Core Switch, I need to use only a Management Interface with port 1 being the main and mapping Distribution system the DS 2 Port as the backup for the Management Interface port. Is this correct? or can I have configure dynamic Interfaces as well. Is the interface of access management / management and configuration only? Management interface will communicate with ACS for AAA and AP who wish to associate with the WLC, is this true?

  Note: WLC, AP, Wireless customers & AP are in the same IP subnet.

  Some other question of WLAN is so it helps me during the implementation.

  Can • I use the 802. 1 x authentication applications saved in Windows XP for the Wireless Interface; instead of the Client Application from Cisco. For this purpose; I have to configure the WLC / Wireless Client use EAP algorithm; is that correct?

  • With the help of MRR, interference between of multiple (3-4 AP) AP in the same area is controlled by the WLC by changing the channels used by the AP, that isn't even on of the AP is it good?

  • How many users Client will connect by channels. 802.11 a / g will provide 11 channels, it is right?

  • I'm putting in the WLC to limit client connections by AP to 25, can this be achieved?

  Please, can someone help me calrifying the points above.

  Kind regards

  Keshava Raju

  Unless this has changed recently, you can't. The ports must be then break into individual groups. You can the controller mode layer 3 as Cisco is the support Layer 2 stop. The Director of the PA is necessary in all cases in LWAPP layer 3 transport mode. Do a search on Cisco.com to the configuration guide for the version of the code you are running. This will give you a step by step installation instructions.

• WLC 7.4.121.0 configuration management interface

  Hello.

  I have a problem Management interface IP setting in new 5508 controller. I get the error "error in the management interface IP configuration". I can't put a management controller IP.

  Start IPv6 Services: ok
  From Config Sync Manager: ok
  Start Hotspot Services: ok
  Starting the PMIP Services: ok
  Starting the Services of Portal Server: ok
  Starting the mDNS Services: ok
  Start Management Services:
  Web server: CLI: ok
  Web security: authentication certificate Web not found (error). If you cannot access the management interface via HTTPS please reconfigure virtual Interface.
  License Agent: ok

  (Cisco controller)

  Welcome to the Setup Wizard Cisco tool
  Use the '-' character of backup

  You wish to terminate autoinstall? [Yes]: -.
  Invalid response

  You wish to terminate autoinstall? [Yes]: no

  Name of the system [Cisco_bf:dd:c4] (31 characters max):
  AUTO-INSTALL: process completed - no configuration not loaded

  Enter administrative username (up to 24 characters): admin
  Enter the administrative password (3 to 24 characters): *
  Administrative password: *.

  Interface Configuration for IP [static] [DHCP] address service: no
  The service Interface IP address: 1.1.1.1
  Service Interface subnet mask: 255.255.255.0

  Enable aggregation LAG (Link) [Yes] [NO]: no

  The Interface IP address management: 192.168.10.1
  Management Interface subnet mask: 255.255.255.0
  Router default Management Interface: 192.168.10.10
  Error in the management interface IP configuration

  The Interface IP address management: 10.10.10.1
  Management Interface subnet mask: 255.255.255.0
  Management router default interface: 10.10.10.100
  Error in the management interface IP configuration

  Address IP Management Interface:

  ····························································································

  Did someone in the face of this issue?

  Thank you.

  Hello

  Try these:

  1. with the WLC, please the Frother (in SecureCRT or hperterminal) the value none. Once the changes are made, CLI will start to work as usual.

  2. Another common reason may be related to the configuration of the virtual interface of the controller. To resolve this problem, remove the virtual interface, and then re - generate with this command:

  WLC >config interface address 1.1.1.1 virtual

  Then restart the controller. After that the controller is restarted, re - generate the certificate webauth locally on the controller with this command:

  WLC >config certificate generate webauth
  In the output of this command, you should see this message: Web authentication certificate has been generated.

  Now you should be able to access the secure web mode of the controller to restart.

  3. try to use a diff for the service interface IP address do not use 1.1.1.1.

  Concerning

  Remember messages useful rates

• [Q] how to build and install an SSL certificate signed for the management of a Cisco 5508 WLC?

  Our security policy requires that all web pages admin must be signed by our CA business. I have successfully implemented a SSL certificate 3rd party Auth Web our WLAN of comments, but I need to install a self-signed certificate for the management of the WLC himself. I followed the instructions here:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk722/tk809/technologies_configuration_example09186a00806e367a.shtml

  but it was more useful for Web auth. I can't find a specific document explaining how it should be done for the management interface.

  Any help much appreciated.

  (1) Please use a password. Empty passwords regularly give problems.

  (2) you don't recombine the key with the certificate before you download to the WLC:

  Combine the CA.pem certificate with the private key, and then convert the file to a .pem file.

  Type this command in the OpenSSL application:

  openssl>pkcs12 -export -in CA.pem -inkey mykey.pem -out CA.p12 -clcerts
  
      -passin pass:check123 -passout pass:check123
  
      
  
      !--- This command should be on one line.
  
  
      openssl>pkcs12 -in CA.p12 -out final.pem -passin pass:check123 -passout pass:check123
  
      

  Note: In this command, you must enter a password for the parameters -passin' and -passout . The password is set to the setting -passout must match the setting SubscriptionId is configured on the WLC. In this example, the password is configured at the time the -passin' and settings -passout is check123. Step 4 of the procedure in the section download the WLC third certificate of this document deals with the configuration of the SubscriptionId parameter.

  The final.pem is the file that is transferred via TFTP to the Cisco WLC.

  Now that you have the certificate of the third-party CA, you must download the certificate to the WLC.

• WLC 5508 management interface

  Hi, I have a design requiring a WLC 5508 be connected to two separate swithces specific wireless. WLC 1 port is connected to the switch A trunk and WLC Port 2 is connected to the switch B. Each switch has its own local VLANS. When I connect the years 1130 towers they need find the interface of management initially then only use management. AP interfaces since there is only a single management interface, if the assignment of management interface on a VLAN that is configured on the switch then APs on spend a fine join but those switch B continue to ask for the management interface and the version debug capwap on WLC he says that this query Join were received on the bad ineterface...

  the only work around that was to do the routing between switch A and switch B for both VLAN residing APs... but for security reasons - customer would like to avoid this

  any help is appreciated...

  Unfortunately, the initial discovery must arrive in the management interface.  Once this has happened the AP expected the second AP manager who is on the subnet of comments, therefore, they are able to stand.  But if the AP is restarted, it would need to discover once again and would fail.

  What is the concern of customers to have all routable network mgmt AP?  guest users can not see anything there.

  IMO, let the AP able to connect to the subnet of mgmt, but then put an ACL L3 upward, to block the subnet of comments to achieve anything in the internal network.

• WLC 5508 Management interfaces

  I'll put up a new 5508.  I have used the config of a 4402, have successfully connected to the path of Service to manage the device, but for some reason any cannot connect to the management interface.  In this case, port 1.

  The service port is connected to a catalyst switch and grabbed an IP (subnet 10.2.x.x) no problem.  I can access the 5508 via https using MS.  However, port 1 is connected to the same Catalyst switch, but on one vlan different (10.20.x.x subnet).  Both ends show that interfaces are in place, I can ping the interface from any other host on the network, but when I try to run the device via https I can't connect.  We use the WCS and I can't add the device to the WCS.  About all I can do is ping this interface.

  I probably forgot something very basic, but I'm stumped.

  We have the same Cisco 5508 controller and we discovered that if you use a computer on the same subnet that the Service interface, you won't not be able to connect to the management of a via HTTP or SSH, even though you 'll be able to ping. We changed the IP address of the service interface, and then we were able to connect to the management of a site.

• Management interface

  I have 2 ASA 5550's in a configuration of active / standby. The client wants to put some sort of 3rd party outside the ASA sitter. They should watch the two ASA at the same time. Can the management interface given a different address on each box.

  Example:

  ASA 1 192.168.1.1

  ASA 2 192.168.1.2

  We are running out of 72 7.1 (2)

  Thank you

  David

  The watch system is never used by the customers themselves. No matter what device is 'Active' it starts you answer the 'Active' IP address and the "Standby" unit takes the IP address of "Standby". However, you can telnet/snmp for each IP address. And that should meet your goal.

  There are a few difficult flats, for example if the management Machine is accessible to the ASA via a dynamic routing protocol while the relief unit will not have these dynamic routes in its routing table. It will take special workaround solutions. Other than that, you can connect to the rescue unit when you want. However this is not recommended/supported to make changes on the rescue unit. Surveillance is hard OK.

  Concerning

  Farrukh