How do the management interface of configuration of an ethernet interface?

Similar Questions

• Use of the Trunk Ports (Cisco) on the management interface

  Hi all

  Background:

  We are in the process of consolidation of 2 farms of esx servers and will end up with 10 guests in a single cluster. Guests come from 2 VLAN separate (say 10 of VLANs and vlan 20). A test I took one of the hosts of HA/DRS and tests with it. For HA and DRS to work efficiently and properly in common all resources, we all want vm to leave both VLAN access to move to any host in the cluster.

  The test:

  My single host mentioned above, I created 2 groups of ports on a vswitch, vlan10 tag and with vlan20, I deployed a VM and tried on the two IP address ranges. It worked (with the correct settings of defined IP by VLAN) but as soon as we resources shared the port used by the management of network vmkernel port we lost the connection to the HOST from a management perspective. What the question is that it is possible to connect the management network a trunk port? We have 2 network interfaces connected to the vSwitch and both used for the VM traffic as well as management traffic. That's how they are currently implemented except that the switch port is on a VLAN-specific rather than shared resources.

  Thank you very much

  Chris

  Hi Chris

  Yes, the network management also accepts the vlan tagging/trunking.

  Just add the number VLAN on the Portgroup.

  Maybe you can do a printscreen with the current configuration?

• ESXi 5, link group, VLAN and the Management Interface

  Greetings-

  I suspect that the answer to my question is: 'Buy an another NIC Intel' but here goes:

  I have a server ESXi here with 2 Intel GigE NIC, connected to the same switch managed ahead of Cisco.  A (vmnic0) NETWORK card is connected to the VLAN 200 while the second (vmnic1) is connected to the VLAN 300.  Ports on the Cisco are defined to access mode.

  Internally, the server ESXi, vmnic0 is connected to the 'public' vSwitch, while vmnic1 is connected to the "private" vSwitch

  I also updated the ESXi management IP 24 even as private vSwitch.  This is the key, I suspect.

  I tried to combine the two GigE interfaces in a connection unique 2xGigE and trunk two VLAN 200 and 300 through it.  After struggling through the menus on the ESXi console INTERFACE, I managed to get the IP management save and who responded and was able to connect to the server with the vSphere client.  I did it in X'ing the vmnic0 and vmnic1 in the configuration interface, then setting VLAN 300 in the configuration of VLANS.  But I could not the team/bundle correctly in the two vSwitches vmnic interfaces.  I could never attach a vmnic to one of the switches.

  Can I do all this with only 2 GigE interfaces and maintain access to IP management?

  SWITCH CISCO < == trunk w / VLAN 200 300 2xGigE == > SERVER ESXI

  VLAN 200 is a 28 audience

  VLAN 300 is a private 24 (for example: 192.168.100.0/24)

  IP management is 192.168.100.2

  I need to create a third VLAN for the management IP address and move?  If I master, say, VLAN 400 down to the ESXi server, use another block 192.168 for his IP address, I'll be able to take the vmnic0 and vmnic1 and team on the TWO vSwitches?

  Always follow me? ... :-)  If I can clarify this, by all means ask.  I apologize for the sort of random babbling here.  Thank you!

  JAS

  jasonvp wrote:

  Rickard Nobel wrote:

  You can not have your two vmnic (physical NIC ports) connected to two vSwitches and at the same time have a "grouping". You need to delete one of the vSwitches and recreate the vSwitch remaining trade. VLAN will insulate them even different networks.

  Thanks for the pointers; I finally had the opportunity to try this out and it works as expected.  I EF you the 'right answer' but apparently the forum won't let me since you already have an answer of "useful".

  Nice that you got it working! When you perform the actual configuration with vSwitch Hash IP and physical switch LAG config, it might be a little difficult to do things in the correct order to not lose connection to the ESXi host.

  You can select this message if you wish.

• Vertical shift in the management interface?

  Hello

  On the PS6110, I know that this vertical failover works fine on the eth0 interface (10 Gig iSCS).  I tested several times and when I unplug eth0 on the (generally CM0) active CM, iSCSI traffic crosses to eth0 on the other CM (i.e. CM1).  Works very well.  However, when I unplug eth1 (management, 100 Mbps copper interface), failover to the interface on the other CM eth1 does not seem to occur.  Is it normal?  Is there a way to allow vertical failover for the management ports?

  Thank you

  Bill

  Hello Bill,

  No, h/s does not support that.  You will need to connect the two ports of Mgmt.

  Kind regards

• How is the user interface of the browser application made...

  Stock in BB10 Navigator seems to have a bar downstairs with an overflow on the side right which, when selected opens a 'Action' Menu and then on the left, there another button that, when selected opens a Menu "tab.  Can someone tell me how it's UI is done.  This flow is possible recreated at cascades...

  Is it possible to place a text field and a button image in an action on the bottom bar?

  Thank you

  The browser INTERFACE is actually built using HTML5, so you can have some difficulty doing so in the Cascades.

• have a cisco CISCO2106 wireless controller. I have configured mangement interface and AP-Manager in this. I can now connect to WLC, through the management interface, but the problem is AP-manager interface to SURVEY not so AP aren't the assoc

  

  What do you mean that's not upward? Can you please upload config and debug? What output do you see on the side of the AP using the console port?

  What is the method of discovery?

• Dynamic management of the mobile AP management interface to another dynamic interface (WLC 2504)

  Situation/configuration is the following:

  -2504 WLC (8.1.131) with a total of 22 AP is connected.

  -Several WLAN active each with its own interface (dynamic)

  -L' (static) management interface is the option "Activate the dynamic management of AP" enabled.

  -The four physical interfaces of the WLC remain TROLLING configured.

  What is the problem:

  In the current configuration, the management interface is in the same vlan as the AP we now want to move the management interface to a different VLAN, but keep the AP in the vlan current. The idea is to move the management interface to its new vlan and disable "enable dynamic management of AP". Then, create a new interface (dynamic) in the same vlan as of AP and select 'turn on the dynamic management of AP' on this interface. Configure it as it is no problem but is does not work. The AP will record is no longer with the WLC.

  Is there something I may be missing why this does not work?

  Richard.

  Yes, that's the gist of it.

  I recommend always making a capture packets if only just for educational purposes and to see how this works in action. I found it interesting when I did in the lab here.

• [Q] how to build and install an SSL certificate signed for the management of a Cisco 5508 WLC?

  Our security policy requires that all web pages admin must be signed by our CA business. I have successfully implemented a SSL certificate 3rd party Auth Web our WLAN of comments, but I need to install a self-signed certificate for the management of the WLC himself. I followed the instructions here:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk722/tk809/technologies_configuration_example09186a00806e367a.shtml

  but it was more useful for Web auth. I can't find a specific document explaining how it should be done for the management interface.

  Any help much appreciated.

  (1) Please use a password. Empty passwords regularly give problems.

  (2) you don't recombine the key with the certificate before you download to the WLC:

  Combine the CA.pem certificate with the private key, and then convert the file to a .pem file.

  Type this command in the OpenSSL application:

  openssl>pkcs12 -export -in CA.pem -inkey mykey.pem -out CA.p12 -clcerts
  
      -passin pass:check123 -passout pass:check123
  
      
  
      !--- This command should be on one line.
  
  
      openssl>pkcs12 -in CA.p12 -out final.pem -passin pass:check123 -passout pass:check123
  
      

  Note: In this command, you must enter a password for the parameters -passin' and -passout . The password is set to the setting -passout must match the setting SubscriptionId is configured on the WLC. In this example, the password is configured at the time the -passin' and settings -passout is check123. Step 4 of the procedure in the section download the WLC third certificate of this document deals with the configuration of the SubscriptionId parameter.

  The final.pem is the file that is transferred via TFTP to the Cisco WLC.

  Now that you have the certificate of the third-party CA, you must download the certificate to the WLC.

• WLC 7.4.121.0 configuration management interface

  Hello.

  I have a problem Management interface IP setting in new 5508 controller. I get the error "error in the management interface IP configuration". I can't put a management controller IP.

  Start IPv6 Services: ok
  From Config Sync Manager: ok
  Start Hotspot Services: ok
  Starting the PMIP Services: ok
  Starting the Services of Portal Server: ok
  Starting the mDNS Services: ok
  Start Management Services:
  Web server: CLI: ok
  Web security: authentication certificate Web not found (error). If you cannot access the management interface via HTTPS please reconfigure virtual Interface.
  License Agent: ok

  (Cisco controller)

  Welcome to the Setup Wizard Cisco tool
  Use the '-' character of backup

  You wish to terminate autoinstall? [Yes]: -.
  Invalid response

  You wish to terminate autoinstall? [Yes]: no

  Name of the system [Cisco_bf:dd:c4] (31 characters max):
  AUTO-INSTALL: process completed - no configuration not loaded

  Enter administrative username (up to 24 characters): admin
  Enter the administrative password (3 to 24 characters): *
  Administrative password: *.

  Interface Configuration for IP [static] [DHCP] address service: no
  The service Interface IP address: 1.1.1.1
  Service Interface subnet mask: 255.255.255.0

  Enable aggregation LAG (Link) [Yes] [NO]: no

  The Interface IP address management: 192.168.10.1
  Management Interface subnet mask: 255.255.255.0
  Router default Management Interface: 192.168.10.10
  Error in the management interface IP configuration

  The Interface IP address management: 10.10.10.1
  Management Interface subnet mask: 255.255.255.0
  Management router default interface: 10.10.10.100
  Error in the management interface IP configuration

  Address IP Management Interface:

  ····························································································

  Did someone in the face of this issue?

  Thank you.

  Hello

  Try these:

  1. with the WLC, please the Frother (in SecureCRT or hperterminal) the value none. Once the changes are made, CLI will start to work as usual.

  2. Another common reason may be related to the configuration of the virtual interface of the controller. To resolve this problem, remove the virtual interface, and then re - generate with this command:

  WLC >config interface address 1.1.1.1 virtual

  Then restart the controller. After that the controller is restarted, re - generate the certificate webauth locally on the controller with this command:

  WLC >config certificate generate webauth
  In the output of this command, you should see this message: Web authentication certificate has been generated.

  Now you should be able to access the secure web mode of the controller to restart.

  3. try to use a diff for the service interface IP address do not use 1.1.1.1.

  Concerning

  Remember messages useful rates

• The ASA Independand IP management interface

  Hello

  I have a pair of ASA 5510 running like a pair of failover 8.4.

  Currently, we have 3 interfaces prod and are also using the management interface in the form of a group management interface.

  AS I joined the two using failover, the interface of management on the second ASA took the IP address of the first. Is it possible to exclude this HA interface so that we can manage, via IP, each device independently? The main reason for this is that two devices sit in different DC so we have another out-of-band to each site network.

  Thank you

  Anthony

  Hello

  I have not personally at least knows of anyway to do this because the devices share the same configuration and switch interface IP address depending on which device is active in the pair.

  To my knowledge each physical interface that is not configured for subinterfaces should be part of the default recovery. I guess in your case, even if it is not accomplish what you're after, you should probably configure "without monitor-interface", if not, to my knowledge, it might affect the State of failover?

  I don't know if there really is a way to make it work as you want. I think Cisco assumes that the management interface is like any other data interface in failover and it requires connectivity between sites where pairs of ASA.

  I guess it would be better if the Console port has been used for this purpose and you had a separate device you can remote access to the Console of the machine you want.

  If you want to send commands to the other ASA the failover and link then it is possible

  For example, you can connect to an ASA and execute commands from the failover link

  exec failover partner

  But again, I don't know if this will be of any help in your situation.

  -Jouni

• How do the 4000th Equallogic Installer management ports

  Hello

  We released Equallogic 4000E with two controllers. I would like to connect the management ports on our "management VLANs" society.

  But I don't know if I need two different IP addresses for the two management ports?

  Or I just organize just one IP address for one of the ports management and EQL will take care of the rest? I understand that a single controller is active at a time.

  Appreciate any clarification on this if you have storage EQL.

  Thank you

  But what I don't understand is the number of IP addresses do I organize for the "management interface."

  1 single IP on your network.

  The standby controller will have all the IP when it become active (and the other become Eve).

  André

• WLC use Management Interface &amp; more get started Questions

  Hello

  I am yet to implement Wireless LAN in one seat of our customers. There are 40 x 1130AG LWAPP AP and WLC 4404 with ACS 4.x for authentication of Wireless Clients attempting to access the LAN.

  For the WLC to connect to the Dual Core Switch, I need to use only a Management Interface with port 1 being the main and mapping Distribution system the DS 2 Port as the backup for the Management Interface port. Is this correct? or can I have configure dynamic Interfaces as well. Is the interface of access management / management and configuration only? Management interface will communicate with ACS for AAA and AP who wish to associate with the WLC, is this true?

  Note: WLC, AP, Wireless customers & AP are in the same IP subnet.

  Some other question of WLAN is so it helps me during the implementation.

  Can • I use the 802. 1 x authentication applications saved in Windows XP for the Wireless Interface; instead of the Client Application from Cisco. For this purpose; I have to configure the WLC / Wireless Client use EAP algorithm; is that correct?

  • With the help of MRR, interference between of multiple (3-4 AP) AP in the same area is controlled by the WLC by changing the channels used by the AP, that isn't even on of the AP is it good?

  • How many users Client will connect by channels. 802.11 a / g will provide 11 channels, it is right?

  • I'm putting in the WLC to limit client connections by AP to 25, can this be achieved?

  Please, can someone help me calrifying the points above.

  Kind regards

  Keshava Raju

  Unless this has changed recently, you can't. The ports must be then break into individual groups. You can the controller mode layer 3 as Cisco is the support Layer 2 stop. The Director of the PA is necessary in all cases in LWAPP layer 3 transport mode. Do a search on Cisco.com to the configuration guide for the version of the code you are running. This will give you a step by step installation instructions.

• Allowing the VPN Clients to the management network - nat woes

  Try to allow the VPNClient IPSEC access to the management network.  packet trace stops on the vpn encrypt even through phase 7 States it's NAT EXEMPT, he said his tent still NAT by a static.  The only thing I can think to put a rule of nat exempted for the subnet on the external interface.

  Please notify.  Thank you.

  Phase: 1
  Type: ACCESS-LIST
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Implicit rule
  Additional information:
  MAC access list

  Phase: 2
  Type: FLOW-SEARCH
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:
  Not found no corresponding stream, creating a new stream

  Phase: 3
  Type:-ROUTE SEARCH
  Subtype: entry
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:
  in 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 outdoors

  Phase: 4
  Type: ACCESS-LIST
  Subtype: Journal
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Access-group MANAGEMENT-IN in the management interface
  access-list MANAGEMENT-IN-scope ip allowed any one
  Additional information:

  Phase: 5
  Type: IP-OPTIONS
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:

  Phase: 6
  Type: FOVER
  Subtype: Eve-updated
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:

  Phase: 7
  Type: NAT-FREE
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  match ip MANAGEMENT 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 outside 172.18.0.32 255.255.255.240
  Exempt from NAT
  translate_hits = 3, untranslate_hits = 33
  Additional information:

  Phase: 8
  Type: NAT
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  static (MANAGEMENT, outside) 203.23.23.75 10.10.10.10 netmask 255.255.255.255
  MANAGEMENT ip 10.10.10.10 host game OUTSIDE of any
  static translation at 203.23.176.75
  translate_hits = 0, untranslate_hits = 1
  Additional information:

  Phase: 9
  Type: NAT
  Subtype: host-limits
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  static (MANAGEMENT, outside) 203.23.23.75 10.10.10.10 netmask 255.255.255.255
  MANAGEMENT ip 10.10.10.10 host game OUTSIDE of any
  static translation at 203.23.23.75
  translate_hits = 0, untranslate_hits = 1
  Additional information:

  Phase: 10
  Type: VPN
  Subtype: encrypt
  Result: DECLINE
  Config:
  Additional information:

  Result:
  input interface: MANAGEMENT
  entry status: to the top
  entry-line-status: to the top
  output interface: OUTSIDE
  the status of the output: to the top
  output-line-status: to the top
  Action: drop
  Drop-reason: flow (acl-drop) is denied by the configured rule

  -EXCERPT FROM CONFIG-

  CorpVPN to access extended list ip 10.10.10.0 allow 255.255.255.0 172.18.0.32 255.255.255.240
  Access extensive list ip 172.18.0.32 CorpVPN allow 255.255.255.240 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0

  mask 172.18.0.33 - 172.18.0.46 255.255.255.240 IP local pool CorpVPN

  access-list MANAGEMENT-extended permitted tcp 172.18.0.32 255.255.255.240 host 10.10.10.11 eq ssh
  access-list MANAGEMENT-extended permitted tcp 172.18.0.32 255.255.255.240 host 10.10.10.10 eq ssh
  access-list MANAGEMENT-extended permitted tcp 172.18.0.32 255.255.255.240 host 10.10.10.13 eq 3389

  access-list 101 extended allow ip 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 172.18.0.32 255.255.255.240

  NAT 0 access-list (MANAGEMENT) No.-NAT-DU-MGMT
  access-list no.-NAT-DU-MGMT scope ip 10.10.10.0 allow 255.255.255.0 172.18.0.32 255.255.255.240

  CorpVPN to access extended list ip 10.10.10.0 allow 255.255.255.0 172.18.0.32 255.255.255.240
  Access extensive list ip 172.18.0.32 CorpVPN allow 255.255.255.240 all

  internal CorpVPN group strategy
  attributes of Group Policy CorpVPN
  value of server DNS 203.23.23.23
  VPN - connections 8
  VPN-idle-timeout 720
  Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec l2tp ipsec
  Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
  value of Split-tunnel-network-list CorpVPN
  the address value CorpVPN pools

  type tunnel-group CorpVPN remote access
  attributes global-tunnel-group CorpVPN
  address pool CorpVPN
  Group Policy - by default-CorpVPN
  IPSec-attributes tunnel-group CorpVPN
  pre-shared key

  First of all, there is overlap crypto ACL with the VPN static L2L:

  crypto ASA1MAP 10 card matches the address 101

  access-list 101 extended allow ip 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 172.18.0.32 255.255.255.240
  access-list 101 extended allow ip 172.18.0.32 255.255.255.240 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0

  I would remove the 2 lines of ACL 101 above because it is incorrect.

  Secondly, from the output of ' cry ipsec to show his ", you seem to be getting the ip address of the"jdv1.australis.net.au", not"CorpVPN"pool pool. Therefore, the No. NAT ACL on the management interface is incorrect. I would just add a greater variety of education no. NAT so that it covers all your ip pool:

  access-list no.-NAT-DU-MGMT scope ip 10.10.10.0 allow 255.255.255.0 172.18.0.0 255.255.255.0

  Thirdly, even with your dynamic ACL 'OUTSIDE_cryptomap_65535.65535' crypto map, it only covers the 172.18.0.32/28, so I just want to add a wider range since it seems you get the ip address of the different pool:

  OUTSIDE_cryptomap_65535.65535 list of allowed ip extended access all 172.18.0.0 255.255.255.0

  Then I would disable the following group of access for purposes of test first:

  no access-group MANAGEMENT - OUT Interface MANAGEMENT

  Finally, please clear all the SA on your ASA and xlate, then reconnect to your vpn client and test it again:

  delete the ipsec cry his

  clear the isa cry his

  clear xlate

  Please let us know how it goes after the changes. If it still doesn't work, please please send again the last configuration and also to send the output of the following:

  See the isa scream his

  See the ipsec scream his

  and a screenshot of the page of statistics on your vpn client. Thank you.

• Dell EqualLogic PS4000 management interface port

  The management interface port can be configured as a port of e/s additional iSCSI on the PS4000 series?

  The online help in the Workgroup Manager console provides instructions on how to do it, but the checkbox "restrict access to the administration" in the parameters of property intellectual eth2 is grayed out. Also the data sheet for the States of SAN: ' two 2 GbE copper, copper 1 1 10/100 (network management only optionally) by controller.

  This option was available that on previous EQL without or is there a way to enable it on the PS4000? Maybe through the CLI.

  Thank you

  Nick

  It's a single management interface.

  In tables PS5x00 and PS6x00 an iSCSI port could be spent to be a single management interface.

• UCS management interface - B series

  Management of the UCS of series B can then passage to uplink ports / Server interconnection fabric and not on the Management Interface of the FI? As in the C series there is a choice in the MMIC where management requires ports LAN (LOM)

  Yes, since IF you have a connection of the mgmt0 port - is for the FI management and KVM blade, etc. (e.g. the OOB management).

  On the IF configure you uplink profits that are used to carry network traffic on the blades.

  On the C series if you configure the port MMIC to be mode shared-LOM then yes all traffic management and the path of data will be done by the same ports LOM. If you choose the dediacted port then you must use the MMIC port on the C series for the management and LOM for the data.

  . / Afonso