VLAN SG300 - 28 p L3 Question

Similar Questions

• VLAN SG300-10 Questions

  

  My apologies if this has been asked before, but I have a few questions on setup of my new switch and network. I've never worked with before switches, so it's quite a learning experience. The image above shows the current provision of my network. Here's how I tried to implement, so far.

  VLAN 1 [1-4 Ports, unidentified, trunk] (172.16.1.1/24)

  Workstation A (wired)

  172.16.1.2/24

  Server B (wired)

  172.16.1.3/24

  VLAN 2 [Ports 5-8, unidentified, trunk] (172.16.2.1/24)

  Server C (wired)

  172.16.2.2/24

  Server (wired)

  172.16.2.3/24

  Server E (wired)

  172.16.2.4/24

  Server F (wired)

  172.16.2.5/24

  VLAN 3 [9-10, unidentified, trunk Ports] (192.168.1.1/24)

  G laptop (wireless)

  DHCP through a router

  H laptop (wireless)

  DHCP through a router

  Laptop I have (wireless)

  DHCP through a router

  Wireless router

  192.168.1.254/24

  Now, my goal is to have all 3 VLAN power talking to each other but also have VLAN 1 access to the internet through the wireless router. In the future, I also Server B to be able to expose services (http and ssh) outwards. VLAN 2 should not have access to the internet at all. I know that I can add static to the wireless router, if necessary routes. All three laptops, can access the internet via the wireless router, with no problems.

  So my questions are:

  (1) is there something inherently wrong with the design of this network? If so, what could be changed?

  (2) 3 VLAN isn't really necessary?

  (3) what I need to do, to get the 3 VLANS communicate with each other?

  (4) what should be the doors, to get internet access 1 VLAN?

  (5) what would need to do, to expose services from Server B to the outside?

  (6) what static routes can I add?

  Thanks in advance!

  Jer

  Hello Jeremy,.

  I think that the problem is probably in the router does not route traffic to the switch. That no interface you specified in your career? Once the routing works, DNS should also work.

  Kind regards

  -David Aguilar

  Cisco Small Business Support Center

• Setup VLAN SG300-52 beginner

  Hello world

  I appreciate, it's a very beginner question and there may be a few facepalms is going to happen, but I could do with help.
  We just bought a SG300-51 switch to enable our businesses to grow. I'm trying to set up 2 VLANS (1 containing a router, the second comes from my pc at the moment so I have test).

  • VLAN 1 (the default) works obviously fine with access to the internet.
  • VLAN 2 (which is the vlan id 10) doesn't have access to the internet.

  For note, our router is run so I have no control over that.

  So for now 1-2 Ports are on the vlan 1 under Access. Port 3 is in vlan 2 access. I changed the 3 to the trunk port, but nothing helped. All traffic is marked as not signposted on all ports.

  IP addresses assigned on the vlan 1 are allocated from the router from 192.168.1.1 to x.x.1.254 (the router is 254). The switch for the vlan 1 is at 192.168.1.1.
  Assigned IP address in vlan 2 (by aboard dhcp on the switch) are 10.0.10.1 - 10.0.10.254 (the 10.0.10.1 switch setting).

  I have an IPv4 static route from: 0.0.0.0 to 192.168.1.254.

  Now, I don't know I'm missing something fundamental and I read through the article furiously to try to discover what is happening, if someone could help and point me in the right direction, I would be very grateful.

  vlan_interface.PNG

  

  vlan_membership.PNG

  

  ip_interface.PNG

  

  ip_route.PNG

  

  ip_dhcp_pools.PNG

  

  ip_pools_detail.PNG

  

  Thanks in advance.

  I could be wrong, but I think it should already be in mode L3 because it appears that he has been able to assign addresses IP interface VLAN 1 and 10.

  If your PC is plugged IG3 access vlan 10 then you should use 10.0.10.1 as your default gateway and you need a way back to 10.0.10.0/24 via 192.168.1.1 in your router/firewall

• Setup VLAN SG300-20

  Hello! Everyone.

  I have 2 small business sg300 switches connected through a catalyst 2960S, I created 2 VLANS and VLAN 3 on two SG300 connect my servers, but those who do not work properly. I connect a pc to a port in each VLAN on the two switches, then I test ping interfaces connected to this VLAN, but sometimes I only connections of a switch, and nothing when I try the second switch. Or I can reach almost all interfaces connected to the switch and one of them does not.  When I disconnect and connect to an interface connected to these switches and try to test again the results change other behaviours.

  I Don t need to route via VLAN I want only the link between each VLAN. So I Don t know if it s necessary to assign an IP address for VLANs

  I made the other configuration using the web interface:

  • I created 2 VLANS and VLAN 3 on each switch SG300 manually and ports assigned to VLANs
  • I configured an each SG300 as TRUNK switch port to connect to the catalyst 2960S. And other ports such as access mode.
  • In the Cat2960S, I configured the ports connected to each SG300 as TRUNK and the traffic of VLAN enabled if these ports.

  The thing is, I don't know what is the problem in my setup. I thought on the GVRP Protocol implementation but Cat2960S support only VTP.

  Does anyone know the right steps to implement this configuration or what is the process to implement the GVRP protocol using these 3 switches?

  I have attached my diagram to know what I m doing.

  Best regards.

  Hello

  In the two SG300 switch:

  Configure the port Fe0/19 in the trunk and VLAN enable this port 1U, 2T, 3T (can be configured on GUI)

  Cat2960 switch:

  Configure the port Fe0/11.0/12 in the trunk and leave all the VLANS. (Vlan 1 must be native.)

  concerning

  Deborah

• Interface VLAN SG300-28 Firmware 1.3.7.18

  Hello

  I just my SG300 to update the last firrmware 1.3.7.1.8 and I met this problem:

  -By default, the interface VLAN has been activated, but the display is always disabled

  -I can not change and I can not ping to the VLAN IP interface as well (I gave an IP 192.168.10.1)

  Is this a bug? Does anyone know how to fix this? Please help me!

  Appreciate your help

  Minh

  minh06,

  You upgrade the startup code for Sx300_FW_Boot_1.3.5.58 ?

  -Marty

• Routing inter - vlan Sg300-28

  Hello

  Thank you and thank you in advance if you can help with this simple configuration

  SG300, how can mode layer 3, you make 2 VLAN see each other?

  In my lab at home:

  Default Vlan1 (GE1: access mode) 192,168,2.254

  Static VLAN10 (GE24: access mode) 192.168.10.1

  Town of Port GE25: Trunk Mode directly connected to interface my router 192.168.2.1)

  Vlan1 can communicate with the outside world and the internet, for example, to a different subnet: 192.168.1.0

  VLAN10 is not visible from the outside and from VLAN1

  How can I allow traffic from VLAN10 through the commune GE25 Port to the outside world?

  The router config says: VLAN10 is diretly connected to 192.168.2.1, but I can't ping. I wonder why?

  Concerning

  Minh

  --------------------------------------------------

  VLAN #show SG300

  Created by: D-default, S-Static, G-GVRP, R-radius assigned VLAN

  Ports created by virtual local network name

  ---- ----------------- --------------------------- ----------------

  1 1 article gi1-23, gi25-28, D m 1-8

  10 gi24 S VLAN10

  Ip #show SG300 road

  Maximum parallel paths: 1 (1 after reset)

  IP routing: enabled

  Codes: > - best, C - connected, S - static

  S 0.0.0.0/0 [1/1] via 192.168.2.1, 36:24:22, vlan 1

  C 192.168.2.0/24 is directly connected, vlan 1

  S 192.168.10.0/24 [1/1] via 192.168.2.1, 27:23:12, vlan 1

  He had to set the default gateway on the switch to 192.168.2.1

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• SG200 to VLAN SG300

  Hi all

  I have a client with of several SG300 for VLAN1 for data and voice VLAN10. PCs are piggy is interrupting the phones and showing in the fine SG300:

  

  A Department has recently employed more people, so we have a SG200 switch to connect the computers and phones. I don't seem to be able to get all the connectivity between the new switch and the SG300 it should connect. I have installation VLAN1 and 10 according to the images below:

  

  

  (Most likely) I'm missing something obvious here?

  Thanks in advance.

  If all ports are 1u, 10 t between the two switches, there is a different problem.

  I guess it's possible that the new switch SX200 can act only wobbly. Pass you any firmware prior to installation?

  I probably load the latest software and the switch to make sure it isn't being weird with you.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• Help VLAN SG300

  I have install successfully one VLAN but...

  neetwork.jpg

  

  Since 192.168.1.x I can ping everything on 192.168.50.x

  Inside the ports VLAN 50 5 & 6 both the portable and the nas server can talk to 192.168.50.1.

  Since 192.168.1.x, I can access all the 192.168.50.1 resources.

  Inside of VLAN 50 I can ping 192.168.50.1 but can't access anything that anybody else in the VLAN or off.

  From the 192.168.50.100 laptop, I cannot ping 192.168.50.50 (NAS), but I can ping the 192.168.50.1 gateway. I can't ping any internet addresses.

  New kind of learning VLAN here. Any ideas why this happens?

  Hello and thanks for the reply.

  I'm sorry, I didn't know what was the purpose of the configuration.

  If what you're trying to do is to configure your network if the switch then makes the routing steps:

  1 - Position the layer 3 switch

  2. create the VLAN

  3 assign Ip addresses to all the VLANS.

  4 - for all VLANS can get out to the internet, you must create a default route on the switch. It should look like this: 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 IP_address_of_router

  5. on the router, you need to create static routes for all the VLANS the router does not know. When you create the static routes, be sure to send this traffic to the IP address of the switch on the same VLAN as the router.

  6 - buy last, perhaps the most important of them step is to ensure that all PC use the IP address of the switch as the gateway by default for the VLAN to which they belong.

  Try this and let us know if it worked. Also, feel free to ask ay if something was not clear enough.

• Configuration of Vlan SG300-20 for the desktop and server ESXi

  Hello

  I'm fairly new to network so please, be gentle.  I'm setting up a number of VLANs for my lab at home.

  I recently moved jobs and took an Oracle Apps of the Middleware & role has therefore need to start picking up the Apache, e-Business Suite, etc. of the load balancers so need to segragate my network to allow different configurations, I want to install in my lab ESXi.

  My setup is detailed below:-

  I have a router of dryatek 2860n which is my entry for the installation of the internet on IP 192.168.1.1

  My Cisco switch has been set to 192.168.1.2 and the installer to use the 3 layer.

  I have a number of PCs connected to my switch I want to use to administer my ESXi server and have access to the different VLANS.

  VIRTUAL LANs, I need are the following

  VLAN 1	192.168.1.x/24				By default / Internet Uplink
  VLAN 12	10.0.12.x/24				Workstations
  VLAN 13	10.0.13.x/24				Server management interface
  VLAN 14	10.0.14.x/24				Public Interface Server
  VLAN 15	10.0.15.x/24				Private server interface
  VLAN 20	10.0.20.x/24				Storage

  My esxi server has two network interfaces that will have traffic MGMT, Public and private configured as virtual interfaces in ESXi and one that runs my traffic of storage/nfs mounts on a QNAP NAS, I want to make it work on my network

  Here is how I have the ports

  A Port VLAN membership
  G1	VLAN1
  G13 - 20	VLAN 12		Need to access the VLAN 1, 13, 14, 15, 20
  G9	VLAN 13, 14, 15
  G10	VLAN 20
  G7 - 8	VLAN 20		LAG configured to QNAP NAS

  G13-20 are my workstations that need to be on VLAN 12, but must also be able to connect to 13, 14, 15, 20, SSH, RDP, NFS

  G9 is the Interface of MGMT of ESXi who need to have traffic on VLAN 13, 14, 15

  G10 is ESXi storage Interface that needs to access the VLAN 20 only

  G7/g8 are connect to QNAP that ideally I want to configure as a LAG.   When I get more interfaces in my ESXi Server I'll finally the team to match.

  I set up an ip interface in my CISCO switch to 10.0.12.1 as gateway to my workstations and created a static route in my router to allow traffic to the switch.  This does not quite yet.

  I also installed a default route to 0.0.0.0

  I followed a number of guides, but struggling to get my head around concepts and how to achieve the above configuration.

  Ideally, I want to configure this through the CLI as Ive had no end of problems with the web interface of the Cisco switch.

  I believe need g9 of trunk, and other ACCESS is it exact.

  How the workstatations to access the other VLAN?

  Any help would be appreciated

  Thank you

  Paul

  Hi Paul, to break it down a little.

  Host A connects to port 13.

  config t

  int gi0/13

  switchport mode access

  switchport access vlan 12

  ESXI connects to port 9

  config t

  int gi0/9

  switchport mode trunk

  switchport trunk allowed vlan add 13-15 (keep in mind this vlan 1 is unmarked here and is the IP of your server interface)

  This translates

  ESXI = 192.168.1.x 24 gateway 192.168.1.2

  interface vlan 1

  IP 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0

  no ip address dhcp

  Host A = 10.0.12.x 24 10.0.12.1

  interface vlan 12

  name of the workstations

  10.0.12.1 IP address 255.255.255.0

  With this basic host configuration at shall communicate to ESXI (no other config on the switch)

  If please try to get the connectivity of base first, then can work on the roads and DHCP.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• Creation of trunk of Cisco 6513 to Cisco SG300 - 10 p for Shoretel phones

  I plugged a new Cisco SG300 - 10 p in an access on our Cisco 6513 port, which is in vtp mode.  I think I will need to create a trunk port of the Cisco SG300 - 10 p 6513, to carry out my office data vlan 1 and my new vlan 112 shoretel VOIP.  I believe that some how all ports are in mode trunk on the default sg300.  I have attached a picture of what it looks like on the management area of vlan sg300.  For some reason any I can plug 3 phones in the sg300 currently just plugged in the 6513 access port and one of the 3 phones come with the vlan voip good 112 and goes into the service very good.  The other 2 phones come but show no service, until I closed the port on sg300 for these other 2 phones and then put the ports back up, then the phones go up.  All of this without going through the port on the Cisco 6513 as a trunk port, it is only now as an access port vlan 1 data and vlan 112 voip vlan.

  My question is, should I put the cisco 6513 in trunk mode and the sg300 will attempt to become the server in vtp and ruin my entire network.  This is what scares me, because I've heard the horror stories of what happens.  My other question is if I have to put the port in trunk mode on him going the sg300 6513, it causes all future phones at the same time without problems?  What would be the cause of 1 of the 3 phones to come as they do and 2 others to come after stop int and put it up?

  Thanks Dave

  Double post.

  Go HERE.

• VLAN overlap when upgrading to ucs 2.0 x

  Hi all

  We'll go to ucs 2.0 x 1.4.3(L).

  As we use the vlan 1 as vlan for ethernet and vlan native VSAN 1 FCoe (which is the default value for 1.4.3L).

  Althuogh we don't use VSAN1 at all, our current Setup uses too running vlan for glutaraldehyde VSAN and Ethernet to guide the UCS firmware upgrade and create a critical alert.

  SO I try to change a VSAN 1 FCoE vlan to vlan 4048 before update firmware the right pick up vlan 4048 is that we want to keep consistency for new UCS construction and implementation at level (4048 is default FCoE vlan for the new installation of UCS) 2.0

  When I connect to the UCS, I found VLANs 4048 looks like has been used by UCS internally (doc cisco suggest the same thing)

  4048 VLAN4048 active Po1 (Po1 is channel uplink ports)

  For the VSAN 1 FCoe VLan change, I have 2 questions:

  1st question is: can I change a VSAN 1 FCoE vlan to 4048 on 1.4.3(L)? Anyone who has the experience to do this?

  2nd question is:

  If the answer to Q1 is YES, what is the impact on the system UCS (ESX host, bare metal server and virtual machine) when I change VSAN 1 FCoE to vlan 4048?

  If you use no traffic set to 4048, you can skip about 4048 VLAN being listed for the channel for the ethernet port interface.

  Padma

• Interface VLAN traffic information

  Hi all

  Could someone please advice what traffic demonstrated Interface VLAN?

  For example, I have two interfaces, VLAN 10, and I created the layer 3 Interface VLAN 10.

  If I monitor the traffic of 10 to VLAN, the two interfaces combined traffic statistics?

  Thank you

  Prasanna Kumar deully

  Oh sorry I thought you meant span monitor where you register the interface traffic combined with the terms of a vlan

  To answer your question, it will display the number of ip layer 3 traffic in packets to all interfaces grouped under the vlan, then Yes, the two interfaces will show the interface of layer 3 vlan, some platforms will also show some L2 information like below and its shows 30 sec count on VLAN interfaces, but number five on the physical interface FA0/1

  Vlan149 is up, line protocol is up
  Material is EtherSVI, the address is 0008.e3ff.fd90 (bia 0008.e3ff.fd90)
  The Internet address is x.x.x.x/24
  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec,
  reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
  Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
  KeepAlive not supported
  Type of the ARP: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00
  Last entry of 00:00:14, exit ever, blocking of output never
  Last clearing of "show interface" counters 24w4d
  Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/dumps); Total output drops: 0
  Strategy of queues: fifo
  Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
    30 second entry rate 2134000 bps, 381 packets/s
  exit rate of 30 seconds 2019000 bps, 460 packets/s
    L2 switching: ucast: 30595061 pkt, 2268569227 bytes - mcast: 0 pkt, 0 bytes
  L3 in Switched: ucast: 5882988002 pkt, 1908218042989 bytes - mcast: 1623 pkt, 775020 bytes
  L3 on Switched: ucast: 5579358870 pkt, 1872959920772 bytes - mcast: 322 pkt, 138259 bytes
  5886751734 packets input, 1885010127367 bytes, 0 no buffer
  Received 0 emissions (28 of IP multicasts)
  0 Runts, 0 giants, 0 shifters
  entry 0, 0 CRC errors, frame 0, saturation 0, 0 ignored
       5618600472 packets output, 1854023804196 bytes, 0 underruns
  0 output errors, 0 interface resets
  output buffer, the output buffers 0 permuted 0 failures

• VLAN voice ISE with MAB

  Hi all

  I just configured the ISE and the switch to make authentication for my phones of vlan voice.

  Authentication and authorization works well with ISE.

  #show TEST-CONTACT authentication sessions

  Interface MAC address method field status Fg Session ID
  Item in gi1/0/1 001a.e867.4c1a mab VOICE Auth 0A0B1050000000250136CED3

  But, I've only one ip phone connected to the switchport mode multi-domain, I don't have any pc connected to the phone yet, but the command 'show mac - add table int xx' show me the telephone ip and two local area networks virtual, 316(voice vlan) mac and vlan 1.

  The question is, why vlan 1? is it good?

  I have only the VLANs voice 316 configured policy result with the VLAN TAG = 316 and permission of field voice check box selected.

  SWITCH-TEST mac address-table interface gigabitEthernet 0/1/1 #show

  Mac address table
  -------------------------------------------

  VLAN Mac Address Type Ports
  ----    -----------       --------    -----
  316 001a.e867.4c1a STATIC item in gi1/0/1
  1 001a.e867.4c1a STATIC item in gi1/0/1

  Thank you

  Rafael

  I would recommend that you keep the command ' switchport voice vlan "because it is what allows the port to be a port" multi - vlan "without set it up as a trunk. If you remove this command and you always want to spend two VLANS (one per voice) and other data, then you will need to configure the port as 'trunk '. Unfortunately, it won't only 802. 1 x is not supported on the trunk ports :)

  I hope this helps!

  Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

• VMWare Player and VLAN

  Hi all out there.

  I have a problem regarding virtual local networks and virtualization. The configuration is as follows. Our developers are about to get virtual machines with Linux (centos) guests on their desktop computers. Host machines are Windows 7 boxes with sufficient CPU, RAM and disk space. Each box has only one NIC installed and connected to the internal LAN. On this single cable Lan, there should be 2 VLANS:

  1. vLan id 100 for windows hosts (configured as default vLan on the switch ports)
  2. vLan id 199 for the machine virtual (different configuration for routing/firewall/proxy)

  The network for the virtual machine must be set to bridged, because making web development, developers must be able to access Web servers installed on the virtual machines via a browser.

  The original plan was to use VMware Player, install Linux, configure the vLan in the comments, and it works. But no package has left the virtual machine when you ping the default gateway of the vLan 199. To me, it seems that something is declining for all packages on vLan the vLan 199.

  The questions are:

  • VLANs are supported by VMware Player or workstation after all?
  • They are supported in a configuration like that?
  • How do we? Must be setup in Windows as well?

  Help would be very nice

  Greetings

  Joachim

  The default virtual network Editor is not installed with VMware Player and you will need to transform automatic bridging and define VMnet0 to use vLAN199 and then bridge network adapter to the Virtual Machine should work.

  For the workaround you can run VMware-player-* .exe - e c:\vmptmp from a command line and then search for the c:\vmptmp\network.cab file and extract (double-click on the .cab file) vmnetcfg.exe (virtual network editor) file in the working directory of VMware Player usually 'C:\Program Files\VMware/VMware Player', you can create a shortcut and place it with the shortcut of VMware Player If you want easier access.  NOTE: It takes several minutes for the VMware-player-* .exe to extract all then be patient.

  Post edited by: WoodyZ - view Original, January 19, 2012 07:41 - removed, first paragraph, that in fact it has been copied from another answer I did earlier and by chance this response.

• Networking on ESXI urgent help!

  Hi all

  I set up a server with VM servers located on different networks,

  rather than trunking VLAN multiple to a single VMhost NIC I would rather use not identified/untrunked links and use all 4 of

  the NIC physical VMware hosts.

  How can I created this?

  Thank you very much

  > It is better to leave the additional vswitches to the default VLAN?

  Your initial question, I assume that you have configured the switch ports as port access/no identified! Because you don't want to use VLANs (of which i usually to avoid single points of failure for example) you will need to set the VLAN on the switch port.

  You will configure the virtual network in the tab "Network" of the ESXi host. From here you can create and modify the vSwitches, i.e. to assign uplink, groups, port...

  André