VM Player 6.0.1 comments Version questions

Similar Questions

• Adobe Flash Player Plugin MSI is a version behind

  Hello

  Lately I noticed that the MSI for Adobe Flash Player Plugin pack is a version or 2 behind.

  http://www.Adobe.com/products/players/Flash-Player-distribution.html

  The .exe file is updated but the MSI is still to 11.5.502.146 while it is in 11.6.602.168. Person is unclear what could be the problem?

  Thanks, appreciated.

  Hi Joshua,.

  The MSI package contains the most recent version and are posted here for download: http://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/fp_distribution3.html.  Can you post the URL you use to download the MSI package that is several versions behind?

  Thank you.

  Maria

• HP Pavilion p6733w: BIOS version question

  HP experts out there or anyone with better information resources?  I'm looking for what type of BIOS initially provided with my computer, a HP Pavilion p6733w with a motherboard RS880 H-Alvorix.

  Hi there @chocolatejeebus,
  
  Welcome to the Forums of HP Support! I understand that you are looking for more information on the original BIOS installed on your system. I'm happy to help you with this.

  If you've never updated the BIOS on your system, or if you have updated once, then the original BIOS must always be available on your computer. This is your current BIOS or you can eat to help: desktop HP - BIOS recovery.

  The support page for your system, HP Pavilion p6733w Desktop PC, the BIOS for the Board you describe is: N-Alvorix-RS880 motherboard BIOS Update Rev A 6.07. There is no earlier version described at all.

  Please let me know if that answers your question, and if so, please mark this message as a solution. Bravo would be appreciated as well.

• WRT54G (version 2) Firmware Version Question

  Hello

  Beautiful room here. I'm glad that this facility exists.

  I have the router WRT54G version 2. Finally, I upgraded the version of firmware years before Cisco Linksys bought.

  A recent announcement by the people of Black Hat (treaties in this article of TechSpot) about their intention to publish a validation tool to exploit a vulnerability of DNS rebinding on a great many routers SOHO forced me to check for the latest update of firmware for my router.

  The interesting thing is that my router's Web interface lists the current version of the firmware as 4.30.12, but the latest version of the downloadable firmware that I see listed on the support site is 4.21.1. I'm not very surprised by this apparent anomaly. If I remember correctly, that firmware version 4.30.12 download is a beta that was supposed to fix a problem connecting WiFi to a certain type. If this version of the firmware was still considered a beta at the time of the acquisition of Linksys by Cisco - or a 'stable' later firmware version incorporating the same or better fixes for the issues addressed by 4.30.12 that had been produced at that time-so maybe 4.30.12 was ruled out.

  If you read the article of TechSpot and the associated table of preliminary vulnerability, test reports, you'll see that router WRT54G version 2 is not specifically listed. Version 3 of the router is listed as vulnerable, and version 5 of the router is not.

  So, my questions are:

  Everyone here is aware of information indicating whether or not the problem of DNS Rebinding vulnerability affects the WRT54G version 2 with the last registered (4.21.1) router firmware version?

  If so, does anyone know if yes or no Cisco plans to release an update for this old router?

  If the router is vulnerable and will not be solved with a firmware update I'll probably have myself a new LInksys router which is not listed as vulnerable. (Believe me, I'm not leaving this thread to bash Linksys. This router ran like a train of 24 hours a day for years without a single hiccup that was not directly attributable to the problems of the ISP. For the price, it's one of the best purchases of equipment I've ever done calculation. And I have done this since the beginning of the 80s when I was using a CP/M system and an Apple / / e.)

  If the 4.21.1 version firmware for WRT54G version 2 is not affected, I wonder if anyone knows if yes or no 'downgrading' of 4.30.12 to 4.21.1 is likely to lead to a failure of the router. (I'll probably try it anyway. If it brick the router I'll just go ahead and get a new one.)

  BTW, I use this router with the ease of remote administration and UPnP off and strong admin password that is changed each week. (When I always used wireless I used WPA2 AES with strong password, but I am all wired now with the systems running Debian testing).

  Forgive me for talking to myself. I decided to just go ahead and "downgrade" of the 4.30.12 firmware 4.21.1 version - just because I prefer to use a version of firmware known and supported for this material. The downgrade has gone well, so no worries about this.

  I'll look for news on whether or not this version of the firmware on this particular router is vulnerable to the flaw in DNS rebinding and acts accordingly.

  Sorry for the noise.

• 7130e upgrade OS version question

  Hi guys.

  Can you give the link to upgrade version OS 4.2.1 or 4.2.2?

  My BB model is 7130e.

  Thanks in advance.

  Visit this link for more information on the update of device OS: http://tinyurl.com/y8qs5s

  You can install software from another operator wireless device if there is any software device for your operator.

  It's an off-topic here.

  After these questions in this section of the forum:

  http://supportforums.BlackBerry.com/Rim/Board?Board.ID=Other_devices

  or here:

  http://supportforums.BlackBerry.com/Rim/Board?Board.ID=BlackBerryDeviceSoftware

• Media Center Extender and xbox - version question

  I've been recently using WMC TV recording, but I can't get the message to my TV. I think of buying any old Xbox console to get the Extender. -I really hate on the games-just the Extender. Is there a certain version of the Xbox that I have Extender? Thank you.

  Hi Dean,

  Thanks for posting this question in the Microsoft Community.

  You can go through the article to learn more about setting up a Windows Media Center.

  If you have an Extender that worked with Windows Vista, it should work with Windows 7. For example, the Xbox 360, which includes the built-in Media Center Extender functionality will work with Windows 7.

  Former dilution models that have been developed for use with Windows XP Media Center Edition 2005 do not work with Windows 7. I suggest you to be sure to read the fine print on the expansion box before you buy.

  Hope this information was helpful and let us know if you need assistance in the future. We will be happy to help you.

• Flash Player Add-on has 2 versions and old affects my ability to watch video

  In my screen modules it shows 2 versions of Shockwave Flash (bad) 11.5.r502 and 21.0.r0 (updated) when I try to 'never use' the old version, it also disables the new version. I'm watching streaming video from my cable provider and it keeps telling me that I don't have the Flash player update and it shows the numbers associated with the wrong version. I can't find anyway to remove completely the wrong version. I tried to "never use" both of them and resettlement and it does not solve the problem either. "

  I thought about it. I use Firefox and Windows 10. I had to remove Flash player and reinstall manually. Now the 'bad' is gone and everything is back to normal.

• using the player for years, this new version available message, choose update, update failed. current version now does not, uninstalled attempted to load the new version of the download site. Download did not say the latest version already exists but is n

  IV ' e use player for years. received message new version available. has chosen the update failed. current version does not now. Drive not installed. I tried downloading newer version of site download failed saying existed, but it doesn't. Help?

  You can try to use this tool first remove all traces of your computer:

  http://labs.Adobe.com/downloads/acrobatcleaner.html

  Then you can download the complete player offline installer from

  http://get.Adobe.com/reader/Enterprise/

  After downloading, restart your computer and run the Setup program before anything else.

• Adobe Bridge CS 5.1 version question process

  I currently use Adobe Bridge CS5.1 to process my raw files.  I started to send my post production and I seeing questions or tweeking corrections other companies (they use LR5.7).  They send me to xmp... I can see the corrected image in bridge when I place their xmp in my image folder.  But I do not see real adjustments... exhibition, black, etc... That's why I can't just tweek their adjustments...

  I get a message;   The selected image uses the 2012 process.  Convert in 2010 process to set the... Convert to the 2012 process

  When I do go to the default settings.

  Can I apply a camera Raw process 2012 as my default process in Adobe Bridge CS5.1?

  If so, how?

  Thanks in advance for your help.

  Hi NiPhoto,

  > I get a message;   The selected image uses the 2012 process.  Convert in 2010 process to set the... Convert to the 2012 process >

  I can't find how you can apply a process appeared in Camera Raw v7 when your version can support up to v6.7 of Camera Raw.

  I think you will spend to CS6 at least to be able to work with files of your colleagues as editable Camera Raw files. The interface used by the process of 2012 substantially changed from the interface in 2010.

• How can I uninstall the CD player and reinstall a previous version of the player?

  I tried the Adobe Reader DC and find the appearance of terrible application. The icons are ugly, waste 30% of the visible area of the toolbar on the right border, and I have no plans to use cloud services. I checked the pages of Adobe support for older versions of Reader. All the links that say "older versions" bring back to the DC installation page.  Where are the other versions of the player?

  Thanks for the help.

  Depending on your operating system, you can download the Reader X, XI and http://get.adobe.com/reader/enterprise/ DC

  You must uninstall the drive before attempting to install and the old version.

• Distribution of the Flash Player downloads page lists wrong version 11.4.402.278 (really 11.4.402.267)

  FYI, the page Flash Player Distribution downloads (http://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/distribution3.html) lists the wrong version 11.4.402.278 (really 11.4.402.267) in the header. I downloaded the Plugin and ActiveX. File MSI for Windows, listed under Flash Player 11.4.402.278. During the edition of each. MSI in Orca, it lists the ProductVersion as 11.4.402.267. And, indeed, after install two appwiz.cpl watch versions of ProductName = Adobe Flash Player ActiveX 11 and ProductName = Adobe Flash Player 11 Plugin as 11.4.402.267.

  This is a bug with the version string of the MSI package.  The active control x from Flash Player to the actual address displays the correct version (11.4.402.278).  Our internal bug for this issue number is 3333545 and we hope that this will be fixed in the next version.  I also posted about this here: http://forums.adobe.com/message/4711264#4711264

  Thank you

  Chris

• Update Flash Player today to the latest version, 11.3.300.262, and now FB4.6 debugger do not work.

  Title says it all.  I'm always up to date Flash Player whenever I get one of these dialog boxes 'Flash Player update now' when a new version comes out I say to myself that I would always have the latest version as I'm developing software with it.  However, while all other updates have never caused this problem today immediately after the update, I get this error when you try to launch my application through the IDE Flash Builder 4.6 with the debugger:

  

  When I select 'Yes' nothing is displayed in the console, and then I thought it was fruitless via another dialog box:

  

  The copy of debugging always built and lance in my browser, but I just can't use my debugger more.  I tried to call Support technique Adobe on this matter on the phone, but after collecting all my information (including verification of that series was a play that I bought in fact), I was told that they couldn't help me unless I paid them more money - which is a little ridiculous since there was an update to adobe who broke it.

  Basically, I'm curious if a) this is a known issue or not yet, and b) what I can do to make any return to work correctly short of reinstalling FB 4.6 (that is to say, can I downgrade Flash Player to that preceding the most recent update?).

  Thank you!

  EDIT: I uninstalled flash player and was then a fresh re-install the latest version - still get the same errors.

  EDIT 2: removed the Flash Player again and this time installed the last version Release, 11.3.300.257 - I still get the same error.  Maybe something broke up with Flash Builder.  I have yet to get all the answers, I'm just going to go ahead and reinstall Flash Builder.  Report back if that fixes it or not...

  EDIT 3: Okay, so I uninstalled Flash Player and Flash Builder completely.  I installed the latest version of Flash Player once again (11.3.300.262), then the latest version of Flash Builder 4.6.  Always make the SAME MISTAKE.  I'll go home for now and come back in the morning.  Please, any help or suggestions are greatly appreciated, as I can't get any job without the debugger.

  This is a known bug in Flash Builder 4.5 and 4.6.

  It will be fixed in the next version of Flash Builder.

  The workaround for Flash Builder 4.5 and 4.6 is to download the two 32-bit & 64-bit debug player.

• Comments and questions about the mixture ADF Page flows with Trinidad UI

  Hi all
  
  I did a few tests to see how possible it is to use Trinity to the UI (for compatibility of this stinking IE 6) as well as the ADF Page flows / controller of the ADF. My question is whether there is a sustainable configuration from the point of view of Oracle. I did things to make it work and noted the following interesting behaviors (call anaomalies, if you wish):
  
  (1) addition of ADF Page Flow within the reach of the technology for a project automatically adds ADF Faces. If I try to eliminate ADF Faces of the scope of technology, it automatically deletes the flow of Page of ADF as well.
  
  (2) if I remove the ADF Faces DURATION 11 project library and create a page of trinidad (also set up the renderkit and as appropriate skin and remove a moment-false ServletADFFilter of web.xml) I get errors MDS when running the resulting page. I can't correct the error by removing the MDS libraries either - as soon as I put ADF Faces DURATION 11 library back, things are OK.
  
  (3) since I've faced ADF in my scope of technology, all newly created JSPX pages end up having af:document / af:form tags and have the namespaces implemented for ADF Faces. Not useful if I want only parts of Trinidad, but not a show-stopper, either.
  
  (4) an interesting thing that I have reported before... If I have the ADF Page library flow into my project and then configure navigation case in faces-config. XML (I know, wouldn't do that, just an observation, even if someone who has accidentally library ADF Page Flow in their project without any intention to use the ADF Page flows will find this very annoying to debug...), the first click of button that leads to the navigation works very well. All subsequent navigation requires two clicks on the link/button to trigger navigation. This behavior does not occur if you change the case of navigation to redirect = true.
  
  So, in summary, I seems to be the controller of flow/ADF Page ADF working with Trinidad, with a few minor problems of productivity due to an obvious requirement to have the Library Runtime of ADF Faces and the extent of technology ADF Faces included in my project. Now Oracle - is this going to be a sustainable configuration?
  
  I'd also appreciate comments, suggestions and comments from anyone else who has tried or is trying to use the ADF Page flows / ADF controller with a single user Trinity interface (well, in my case, I'm going to blur more using the tag af:template with components of the Trinity, but it's another whole story).
  
  Best,
  
  John
  
  bump #2

  + 1). Adding the ADF Page Flow within the reach of the technology for a project automatically adds ADF Faces. If I try to eliminate ADF Faces of the scope of technology, it automatically deletes the flow of Page of ADF as well. +

  ADF task flows have to ADF Faces e around. Not sure this is documented somewhere, but I hope it's

  (2) no idea about it

  + 3). Since that I've faced ADF in my scope of technology, all newly created JSPX pages end up having af:document / af:form tags and have the namespaces implemented for ADF Faces. Not useful if I want only parts of Trinidad, but not a show-stopper, either. +

  Looks like that is facing an emergency room to have an option in the dialog creation page if create an ADF or page of Trinidad. I'll take a note

  + 4). An interesting thing that I have reported before... If I have the ADF Page library flow into my project and then configure navigation case in faces-config. XML (I know, wouldn't do that, just an observation, even if someone who has accidentally library ADF Page Flow in their project without any intention to use the ADF Page flows will find this very annoying to debug...), the first click of button that leads to the navigation works very well. All subsequent navigation requires two clicks on the button/link to trigger navigation. This behavior does not occur if you change the case of navigation to redirect = true. +

  I'm not sure how to restrict we are on the "do not use" them in combination, but to me this looks like a bug.

  Frank

• Firefox will not play flash player even if the latest version is installed

  I can't play videos (e.g. on the BBC website) - I continue to be invited to install Flash. I've uninstalled and reinstalled Flash several times but to no avail. The "always enable" is selected in the addons page. Also the old version of shockwave is still showing on the list and I can't remove it.

  Finally solved the problem by seeking NPSWF32DLL and Delete it!

• buy the new iphone and IOS version questions

  Hello

  am about to buy a new iphone and you're wondering how to find which exact version of IOS a. sellers say its IOS is 9, well no, I want to know the version of it as if its 9.0.2 or 9.1 something like that. is it far from finding in his series on the box? I don't want to buy the iphone and do not know how to check. Help, please.

  Hello

  don't worry abt the IOS version, after having bought the phone, you can update to the latest IOS 9.3 by yourself... See you soon.