VPN needs access to all external internal vpn traffic traffic all in tunnel

Similar Questions

• Restriction of dblink need access to all objects

  Hell of all;
  
  I can't stop hr user, this user can access all objects in scott.
  * I want to restrict the user hr. I want to settle hr user needs access only emp1 table and any other tables.
  How can I do this?
  
  the user is scott
  SQL > create mvemp1 view materialized in select * from emp1.
  
  the user is RH
  
  SQL > create link1 link database to connect to scott identified by Tiger using 'orclprod ';
  Database link created.
  

  SQL > select DB_LINK, username user_db_links;

  DB_LINK USERNAME
  LINK1. REGRESS. RDBMS. DEV. US. ORACLE.COM SCOTT
  

  SQL > select count (*) in the scott.emp@link1;
  COUNT (*)
  14

  SQL > select count (*) in the scott.samp@link1;
  COUNT (*)
  100

  SQL > select count (*) in the scott.salgrade@link1;
  COUNT (*)
  5

  thanks in advance...

  969352 wrote:
  SB... sorry I didn't.

  The ONLY way to "restrict" access is not given in the first place!

  Some documents about restrictions

  If/when you ever issue any GRANT, then access is not & cannot occur.
  If/when the user has access & you want to deny access, and then REVOKE the previous GRANT.

• New user needs access to the old user profile files

  Windows 7 Pro on a W2008 domain, the latter leaves the company; User_B will take his place and needs access to all files (including e-mail - WindowsLiveMail);  There are currently three email accounts configured in the profile of the latter.  What is the best way to give User_B access to the data?  I tried to copy the data from the profile folder to the folder profile User_B, but when I try to open a document (Office 2002), I get "there was a problem sending the command to the program".

  When I tried to copy the profile via the control panel... Settings, user profiles, the option "copy to" was not available.

  There must be a relatively simple way to do this.  Help, please.

  This issue is beyond the scope of this site (for consumers) and to be sure, you get the best (and fastest) reply, we have to ask either on Technet (for IT Pro) or MSDN (for developers)
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home s/fr-U.S./Accueil
  http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/Forum
  
  
  If you give us a link to the new thread we can point to some resources it

• RRAS do I need VPN connected users internet access through my firewall internal

  I have some remote users who need access to some internet resources via my internet firewall which is local to the subnet on the side of the tunnel. Can someone tell me how to set up routes in the table routing static to allow traffic to access our firewall when internet is requested? Thank you very much

  Andrew

  Hi André,.
  Please go to the Microsoft Community Forums.
  This problem would be better suited to the TechNet community.
  Please visit the link below to find a community that will support what ask you
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en/category/w7itpro
  I hope this helps. If you have any other queries/issues related to Windows, write us and we will be happy to help you further.

• VPN; list of access on the external interface allowing encrypted traffic

  Hi, I have a question about the access list on the external interface of a router 836. We have several routers on our clients site, some are lan2lan, some are client2router vpn.

  My question is; Why should I explicitly put the ip addresses of the client vpn or tunnel lan to the access list. Because the encrypted traffic to already allowing ESPs & isakmp.

  The access list is set to the outgoing interface with: ip access-group 102 to

  Note access-list 102 incoming Internet via ATM0.1

  Note access-list 102 permit IP VPN range

  access-list 102 permit ip 192.123.32.0 0.0.0.255 192.123.33.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 102 permit ip 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 any

  access-list 102 permit esp a whole

  Note access-list 102 Open VPN Ports and other

  access-list 102 permit udp any host x.x.x.x eq isakmp newspaper

  I have to explicitly allow 192.123.32.0 (range of lan on the other side) & 14.1.1.0 (range of vpn client) because if I'm not I won't be able to reach the network.

  The vpn connection is not the problem, all traffic going through it.

  As far as I know, allowing ESPs & isakmp should be sufficient.

  Can anyone clarify this for me please?

  TNX

  Sebastian

  This has been previously answered on this forum. See http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Dpass_through%26location%3Doutline%40%5E1%40.ee9f970/0#selected_message for more details.

• VPN remote access - no network connectivity internal!

  Hi Experts,

  I understand that it is a very common problem when considering the implementations of IPSec VPN for remote access using Cisco VPN Client. But for the last six months, I have tried to configure remote VPN access to as many sites customer and gets stuck to the top with the same question!

  -The remote VPN Client connects, authenticates successfully to the local user database (to make things easier, I used the local user authentication), the tunnel is set up (I could see the exit of the isakmp #show her as a AM_ACTIVE ). So I think that the parameters of encryption and authentication for Phase 1 /Phase 2 should work because the tunnel is having successfully established

  -Now comes the question, no connectivity to the internal network. I tried all the possible solutions, that I could find online.

  1. the most common problem is NAT - Traversal not active

  -Compatible NAT - T with the time default keepalive of 20

  2. None of the configurations NAT to exempt remote VPN traffic

  -A ensured that Nat configurations not present in configuration and internal network 192.168.1.X VPN traffic networks VPN 192.168.5.X /192.168.10.X being exempted NAT

  3-Split tunnel configurations

  -Reconfigured Split tunnel access list configuration Standard access list expanded (although not required as a Standard access list is more than enouugh, if I'm not mistaken) to allow traffic selected from 192.168.1.X for 192.168.5.X/192.168.10.X that will create routes on Client that allows users to simultaneously access VPN resources and access Internet VPN client. The Tunnel from Split network group was added again to the group policy.

  4 enabled Perfect Forward Secrecy (PFS) /Disabled

  . It may be an extra charge, it has been disabled / enabled

  5. the road opposite Injection

  -Ensured that a temporary reverse route has been injected to the routing table by allowing the reverse Route Injection to insert automatically the temporary static routes to the remote tunnel using the command set reverse road networks

  A few more interesting things were noted:

  Encrypted and Bypassed packages found when a continuous ping started the ASA inside the interface.

  No decryption happens of the VPN Client, which means that there is no answer back from the network traffic statistics.

  Decryption and packages are found be increasing when I try to ping of the IP address to the customer (192.168.0.10) has published the SAA. But on the SAA, I'm not back any response and showing as? . So that would mean that there is communication of ASA to the customer via the VPN tunnel while no communication is happening from the internal network to the customer

  

  The entire configuration is shown below

  ASA Version 8.2 (1)
  !
  ciscoasa hostname
  activate the encrypted password of AS3P3A8i0l6.JxwD
  2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted passwd
  names of
  !
  interface Vlan1
  nameif inside
  security-level 100
  IP 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
  !
  interface Vlan2
  nameif outside
  security-level 0
  address IP X.X.X.X 255.255.255.0
  !
  interface Ethernet0/0
  switchport access vlan 2
  !
  interface Ethernet0/1
  !
  interface Ethernet0/2
  !
  interface Ethernet0/3
  !
  interface Ethernet0/4
  !
  interface Ethernet0/5
  !
  interface Ethernet0/6
  !
  interface Ethernet0/7
  !
  passive FTP mode
  access-list extended SHEEP allowed ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0
  ST1 list extended access permitted ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0
  pager lines 24
  asdm of logging of information
  Outside 1500 MTU
  Within 1500 MTU
  IP local pool testpool 192.168.0.10 - 192.168.0.15
  ICMP unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1
  don't allow no asdm history
  ARP timeout 14400
  Global 1 interface (outside)
  NAT (inside) 0 access-list SHEEP
  NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
  Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 X.X.X.X 1
  Timeout xlate 03:00
  Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
  Sunrpc timeout 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 mgcp from 01:00 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00
  Sip timeout 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 prompt Protocol sip-0: 03:00 sip - disconnect 0:02:00
  Timeout sip-provisional-media 0:02:00 uauth 0:05:00 absolute
  timeout tcp-proxy-reassembly 0:01:00
  dynamic-access-policy-registration DfltAccessPolicy
  AAA authentication enable LOCAL console
  AAA authentication http LOCAL console
  the ssh LOCAL console AAA authentication
  AAA authentication LOCAL telnet console
  Enable http server
  http 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 inside
  http 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 inside
  http 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 outdoors
  No snmp server location
  No snmp Server contact
  Server enable SNMP traps snmp authentication linkup, linkdown cold start
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac FirstSet
  life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800
  Crypto ipsec kilobytes of life - safety 4608000 association
  Crypto-map dynamic dyn1 1jeu transform-set FirstSet
  Crypto-map dynamic dyn1 1jeu reverse-road
  dynamic mymap 1 dyn1 ipsec-isakmp crypto map
  mymap outside crypto map interface
  crypto ca server
  SMTP address [email protected] / * /
  crypto ISAKMP allow outside
  crypto ISAKMP policy 1
  preshared authentication
  3des encryption
  sha hash
  Group 2
  life 43200
  Telnet timeout 5
  SSH 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 outdoors
  SSH 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 inside
  SSH timeout 5
  Console timeout 0
  dhcpd outside auto_config
  !
  dhcpd address 192.168.1.10 - 192.168.1.132 inside
  dhcpd dns 8.8.8.8 4.4.4.4 interface inside
  dhcpd allow inside
  !
  a basic threat threat detection
  Statistics-list of access threat detection
  no statistical threat detection tcp-interception
  WebVPN
  internal RAVPN group policy
  RAVPN group policy attributes
  Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
  Split-tunnel-network-list value ST1
  the address value testpool pools
  dk Z6zukyDvwVjP7o24 encrypted privilege 15 password username
  sv i1gRUVsEALixX3ei encrypted password username
  tunnel-group testgroup type remote access
  tunnel-group testgroup General attributes
  address testpool pool
  Group Policy - by default-RAVPN
  testgroup group tunnel ipsec-attributes
  pre-shared-key *.
  !
  class-map inspection_default
  match default-inspection-traffic
  !
  !
  type of policy-card inspect dns preset_dns_map
  parameters
  message-length maximum 512
  Policy-map global_policy
  class inspection_default
  inspect the preset_dns_map dns
  inspect the ftp
  inspect h323 h225
  inspect the h323 ras
  inspect the rsh
  inspect the rtsp
  inspect esmtp
  inspect sqlnet
  inspect the skinny
  inspect sunrpc
  inspect xdmcp
  inspect the sip
  inspect the netbios
  inspect the tftp
  !
  global service-policy global_policy
  context of prompt hostname
  Cryptochecksum:48f0863a70b8f382c7b71db0b88620fe
  : end

  ----

  Could you please help me identify where I'm going wrong. Its been a long time I have trying to figure out but nothing seems to work! ;-(

  Help, please!

  Thank you

  ANUP

  (1) pls replace the tunnel ACL ACL standard split as follows:

  no extended ST1 192.168.1.0 ip access list allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0

  access-list allowed ST1 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0

  (2) add icmp inspection:

  Policy-map global_policy

  class inspection_default

  inspect the icmp

  (3) Finally, I add the following so that you can test the ASA inside the interface:

  management-access inside

• No remote access VPN traffic of Asa

  Hi all

  I set up a Vpn on ASA5510 remote access.

  When the client connect, receive the ip address of the pool (192.168.55.X) but generates no traffic.

  If I type ipconfig on the pc I have only IP and mask but no gateway is not assigned, is this normal?

  If I ping a host of pc to all hosts on the local network 192.168.0.X in the logs I have:

  "3 14 July 2012 16:15:50 305005 192.168.0.10 no group translation found for icmp src FASTWEB:192.168.55.1 dst (type 8, code 0) LAN:192.168.0.10 '

  NAT could be a problem but I do not understand how to do it.

  That's my piece of config:

  standard access list test_splitTunnelAcl allow Net_R_Dmz 255.255.255.224

  standard access list test_splitTunnelAcl allow Net_R_Server 255.255.255.0

  standard access list test_splitTunnelAcl allow Net_R_Client 255.255.255.0

  standard access list test_splitTunnelAcl allow Net_V_VoIP 255.255.255.0

  standard access list test_splitTunnelAcl allow Net_V_Lan 255.255.255.0

  test_splitTunnelAcl list standard access allowed 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0

  permit access ip 192.168.0.0 scope list Lan_nat0_outbound 255.255.255.0 Net_R 255.255.255.0

  permit access ip 192.168.0.0 scope list Lan_nat0_outbound 255.255.255.0 Network_V object-group

  permit access ip 192.168.0.0 scope list Lan_nat0_outbound 255.255.255.0 Net_R_Client 255.255.255.0

  permit access ip 192.168.0.0 scope list Lan_nat0_outbound 255.255.255.0 Net_R_Server 255.255.255.0

  permit access ip 192.168.0.0 scope list Lan_nat0_outbound 255.255.255.0 Net_R_Dmz 255.255.255.224

  Lan_nat0_outbound ip Net_VpnClient 255.255.255.0 allowed extended access list all

  Fastweb_access_in ip Net_R_Client 255.255.255.0 allowed extended access list all

  Fastweb_access_in ip Net_R_Server 255.255.255.0 allowed extended access list all

  Fastweb_access_in ip Net_R 255.255.255.0 allowed extended access list all

  Fastweb_access_in ip Net_VpnClient 255.255.255.240 allowed extended access list all

  permit access ip 192.168.0.0 scope list Lan_access_in 255.255.255.0 any

  mask 192.168.55.1 - 192.168.55.10 255.255.255.240 IP local pool Vpn_Pool

  Global (FASTWEB) 1 interface

  NAT (LAN) 0-list of access Lan_nat0_outbound

  NAT (LAN) 1 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0

  Access-group Fastweb_access_in in interface FASTWEB

  Lan_access_in access to the LAN interface group

  Route FASTWEB 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 93.x.x.x 1

  internal group R10M strategy

  attributes of R10M group policy

  Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec

  Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified

  value of Split-tunnel-network-list test_splitTunnelAcl

  tunnel-group R10M type remote access

  attributes global-tunnel-group R10M

  address pool Vpn_Pool

  Group Policy - by default-R10M

  IPSec-attributes tunnel-group R10M

  pre-shared-key *.

  Thank you.

  M.

  Hi Marco,.

  see this:

  Phase: 7

  Type: NAT

  Subtype:

  Result: ALLOW

  Config:

  NAT (LAN) 1 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0

  LAN ip 192.168.0.0 match FASTWEB 255.255.255.0 any

  dynamic translation of hen 1 (93.x.x.x.x [Interface PAT])

  translate_hits = 267145, untranslate_hits = 18832

  Additional information:

  Definition of dynamic 192.168.0.10/0 to 93.x.x.x.x/18070 using subnet mask 255.255.255.255

  do not hit the exemption from the rule,

  Please add this to your nat 0 access-list:

  Lan_nat0_outbound line 1 scope ip allow any 192.168.55.0 255.255.255.0

  and let me know how it goes.

  Good luck.

  Mohammad.

• Newbie Help Needed: Cisco 1941 router site to site VPN traffic routing issue

  Hello

  Please I need help with a VPN site-to site, I installed a router Cisco 1941 and a VPN concentrator based on Linux (Sophos UTM).

  The VPN is established between them, but I can't say the cisco router to send and receive traffic through the tunnel.

  Please, what missing am me?

  A few exits:

  ISAKMP crypto to show her:

  isakmp crypto #show her

  IPv4 Crypto ISAKMP Security Association

  DST CBC conn-State id

  62.173.32.122 62.173.32.50 QM_IDLE 1045 ACTIVE

  IPv6 Crypto ISAKMP Security Association

  Crypto ipsec to show her:

  Interface: GigabitEthernet0/0

  Tag crypto map: QRIOSMAP, local addr 62.173.32.122

  protégé of the vrf: (none)

  local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (192.168.20.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)

  Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (192.168.2.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)

  current_peer 62.173.32.50 port 500

  LICENCE, flags is {origin_is_acl},

  #pkts program: encrypt 0, #pkts: 0, #pkts digest: 0

  #pkts decaps: 52, #pkts decrypt: 52, #pkts check: 52

  compressed #pkts: 0, unzipped #pkts: 0

  #pkts uncompressed: 0, #pkts compr. has failed: 0

  #pkts not unpacked: 0, #pkts decompress failed: 0

  Errors #send 0, #recv 0 errors

  local crypto endpt. : 62.173.32.122, remote Start crypto. : 62.173.32.50

  Path mtu 1500, mtu 1500 ip, ip mtu IDB GigabitEthernet0/0

  current outbound SPI: 0x4D7E4817 (1300121623)

  PFS (Y/N): Y, Diffie-Hellman group: group2

  SAS of the esp on arrival:

  SPI: 0xEACF9A (15388570)

  transform: esp-3des esp-md5-hmac.

  running parameters = {Tunnel}

  Conn ID: 2277, flow_id: VPN:277 on board, sibling_flags 80000046, crypto card: QRIOSMAP

  calendar of his: service life remaining (k/s) key: (4491222/1015)

  Size IV: 8 bytes

  support for replay detection: Y

  Status: ACTIVE

  Please see my config:

  crypto ISAKMP policy 1

  BA 3des

  md5 hash

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  encryption... isakmp key address 62.X.X... 50

  ISAKMP crypto keepalive 10 periodicals

  !

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac TS-QRIOS

  !

  QRIOSMAP 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  peer 62.X.X set... 50

  transformation-TS-QRIOS game

  PFS group2 Set

  match address 100

  !

  !

  !

  !

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0/0

  Description WAN CONNECTION

  62.X.X IP... 124 255.255.255.248 secondary

  62.X.X IP... 123 255.255.255.248 secondary

  62.X.X IP... 122 255.255.255.248

  NAT outside IP

  IP virtual-reassembly in

  automatic duplex

  automatic speed

  card crypto QRIOSMAP

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0/0.2

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0/1

  LAN CONNECTION description $ES_LAN$

  address 192.168.20.1 255.255.255.0

  IP nat inside

  IP virtual-reassembly in

  automatic duplex

  automatic speed

  !

  IP nat pool mypool 62.X.X... ... Of 122 62.X.X 122 30 prefix length

  IP nat inside source list 1 pool mypool overload

  overload of IP nat inside source list 100 interface GigabitEthernet0/0

  !

  access-list 1 permit 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 2 allow 10.2.0.0 0.0.0.255

  Note access-list 100 category QRIOSVPNTRAFFIC = 4

  Note access-list 100 IPSec rule

  access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 101 permit esp 62.X.X host... 50 62.X.X host... 122

  access list 101 permit udp host 62.X.X... 50 62.X.X... host isakmp EQ. 122

  access-list 101 permit ahp host 62.X.X... 50 62.X.X host... 122

  access-list 101 deny ip any any newspaper

  access-list 110 deny ip 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 110 permit ip 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255 any

  !

  !

  !

  !

  sheep allowed 10 route map

  corresponds to the IP 110

  The parts of the configuration you posted seem better than earlier versions of the config. The initial problem was that traffic was not in the VPN tunnel. That works now?

  Here are the things I see in your config

  I don't understand the relationship of these 2 static routes by default. It identifies completely the next hop and a mask the bytes of Middleweight of the next hop. Sort of, it seems that they might be the same. But if they were the same, I don't understand why they both make their appearance in the config. Can provide you details?

  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 62.X.X... 121

  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 62.172.32.121

  This static route implies that there is another network (10.2.0/24) connected through the LAN. But there is no other reference to it and especially not for this translation. So I wonder how it works?

  IP route 10.2.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.20.2

  In this pair of static routes, the second route is a specific subnet more and would be included in the first and routes for the next of the same break. So I wonder why they are there are. There is not necessarily a problem, but is perhaps something that could be cleaned up.

  IP route 172.17.0.0 255.255.0.0 Tunnel20

  IP route 172.17.2.0 255.255.255.0 Tunnel20

  And these 2 static routes are similar. The second is a more precise indication and would be included in the first. And it is referred to the same next hop. So why have the other?

  IP route 172.18.0.0 255.255.0.0 Tunnel20

  IP route 172.18.0.0 Tunnel20 255.255.255.252

  HTH

  Rick

• VPN traffic via a secondary access provider

  Hello world

  I have been asked by a client to implement this topology:

  

  where:

  ISP 1 is used as primary internet connection.

  2 ISP will be used to connect remote users by IPsec VPN.

  Currently, I'm not looking for the Active/Backup feature, I need to know if I can use both ISP connections (as I've written before) an ISP for the Internet company and the other for the user remote access VPN.

  I read some post where, said, it's possible, but I want to be sure.

  Kind regards

  Jose

  ASA must add the static route in the routing table automatically when the VPN client is connected. So, in general, you don't need to do anything. But if not, you can just manually configure who will forward a VPN client IP packet to ISP2.

  With respect to NAT, in general, VPN traffic must ignore the NAT. You can use "nat (inside_interface_name) 0-list of access ' with an ACL that define the vpn traffic to do so.

• Have icons of way too many shortcut on the desktop, but the problem is that I need them all. How can I create multiple user accounts with access to all the full program info/files/programs?

  I would like to create the following user accounts:

  1 DeadBoneHunter responsible of genealogy research with full access to all ACCOUNTS/FILES/PROGRAMS.

  2 FLAGGER INSTRUCTOR ACCOUNT with full access to all files, etc.

  3 user of the account of the traffic control with full access to all files etc etc.

  4 Traffic Control Supervisor account with access full etc. etc.

  5 medical accounts Cathy / Warren

  6 EXPAND THE ICON FOR EACH USER... VERY LARGE... THAN WHAT IT IS NOW. WHEN THE WINDOW OF THE SCREEN WITH ALL THE INDICATED THEREON USER ACCOUNTS, I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE ALL THE MORE GREAT.

  >

  > USE WINDOWS 7 ULTIMATE 64

  LAPTOP CONNECTED TO 52 '' MORE LARGE LED DISPLAY AND HAVE A SIZE OF KEYBOARD DUE TO ARTHRITIS IN THE FINGERS CAUGHT TIME TO FIND KEY WITH ENLARGED BUTTONS AND FORMAT PANEL. I HAVE TO JUST GET BIGGER THE ICONS ON THE DESKTOP OF THE USER.

  YOUR HELP WILL BE MUCH APPRECIATED. Thank you

  Here is a close-up.

  

• Is it still possible? Customer VPN traffic through a PIX for an another VPN?

  Hi, I just want to know if the following is actually technically possible? I'm starting to think I'm trying to implement a solution that is simply not possible.

  I have the following:

  VPN<->CiscoPix506e<->Cisco3000 Clients

  VPN clients running an IPSEC VPN for the 506th Cisco PIX and can access its "internal network" very well.

  The Cisco pix is running a VPN to another company where all network traffic is nat'ed to a single address IP RFC1918 before coming out of the tunnel (requirement of the other company to avoid the problems of overlap)

  and everyone on the "internal network" can access this great VPN.

  I want that people who use the VPN client to be able to access the other site-to-site VPN. I think that NAT forced to the external company VPN is a problem.

  All of the examples for VPN VPN cross-I see specify NAT should be disabled on the entire path. I can't do it in this situation. Is it possible to make this work?

  I guess with a good statement of ACL that all my problems will be solved.

  If you just get the users connect to the cisco 3000 rather than transversing my network. I don't have for the following reasons. I have no access to the cisco 3000 vpn concentrator and a very limited amount of the tunnels that they can open for my business. I was instructed to implement a solution to facilitate the life of employees (so that they only run a VPN tunnel at a time to do their work). For the moment, they need access to the systems within our corporate network and external society through the site to site VPN (it's actually a web application). They can do this at the office but obviously not home if they attempt to use remote access.

  I have attached a diagram of the network example PDF explaining the situation.

  Networks of each address is the following (change of the actual address of the innocents :))):

  CLIENTS_VPN

  192.168.10.0/24

  Internal network

  192.168.1.0/24

  External VPN end point

  192.168.20.0/24

  Address used for NAT on the VPN

  172.16.1.1/32

  the IOS config

  local IP pool - 192.168.10.1 VPN CLIENTS - 192.168.10.254

  inside ip access list allow a whole

  access-list allowed SHEEP ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0

  access list permits EXTERNAL-ACL-VPN ip 172.16.1.1 host 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0

  EXTERNAL-ACL-NAT of the list of permitted access ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0

  IP address outside a.b.c.d 255.255.255.0

  IP address inside 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0

  Global interface 2 (external)

  Global (outside) 1 172.16.1.1

  NAT (inside) 0 access-list SHEEP

  NAT (inside) - EXTERNAL-ACL-1 NAT access list 0 0

  NAT (inside) 2 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0

  outside access-group in external interface

  Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 a.b.c.d 1

  Thank you

  Jason.

  I understand from your description of the scenario, you try to route traffic on the same interface on which it was received on the PIX. This is called pinning hair in traffic and is not currently supported in PIX (6.3).

• problem of traffic flow with tunnel created the network with a tunnel to a VPN concentrator

  Hi, I worked with Cisco and the seller for 2 weeks on this.II am hoping that what we are witnessing will ring a Bell with someone.

  Some basic information:

  I work at a seller who needs from one site to the other tunnel.  There are currently 1 site to another with the seller using a Juniper SSG, which works without incident in my system.  I'm transitioning to routers Cisco 2811 and put in place a new tunnel with the seller for the 2800 uses a different public ip address in my address range.  So my network has 2 tunnels with the provider that uses a Cisco VPN concentrator.  The hosts behind the tunnel use 20x.x.x.x public IP addresses.

  My Cisco router will create a tunnel, but I can't not to hosts on the network of the provider through the Cisco 2811, but I can't get through the tunnel of Juniper.  The seller sees my packages and provider host meets them and sends them to the tunnel.  They never reach the external interface on my Cisco router.

  I'm from the external interface so that my endpoint and the peers are the same IP address.  (note, I tried to do a static NAT and have an address of tunnel and my different host to the same result.)  Cisco has confirmed that I do have 2 addresses different and this configuration was a success with the creation of another successful tunnels toa different network.)

  I tested this configuration on a network of transit area before moving the router to the production network and my Cisco 2811 has managed to create the tunnel and ping the inside host.  Once we moved the router at camp, we can no longer ping on the host behind the seller tunnel.   The seller assured me that the tunnel setting is exactly the same, and he sees his host to send traffic to the tunnel.  The seller seems well versed with the VPN concentrator and manages connections for many customers successfully.

  The seller has a second VPN concentrator on a separate network and I can connect to this VPN concentrator with success of the Cisco 2811 who is having problems with the hub, which has also a tunnel with Gin.

  Here is what we have done so far:

  (1) confirm the config with the help of Cisco 2811.  The tunnel is up.  SH cyrpto ipa wristwatch tunnel upward.
  (2) turn on Nat - T side of the tunnel VPN landscapers
  (3) confirm that the traffic flows properly a tunnel on another network (which would indicate that the Cisco config is ok)
  (4) successfully, tunnel and reach a different configuration hosting
  (5) to confirm all the settings of tunnel with the seller
  (6) the seller confirmed that his side host has no way and that it points to the default gateway
  (7) to rebuild the tunnel from scratch
  8) confirm with our ISP that no way divert traffic elsewhere.  My gateway lSP sees my directly connected external address.
  (9) confirm that the ACL matches with the seller
  (10) I can't get the Juniper because he is in production and in constant use

  Is there a known issue with the help of a VPN concentrator to connect to 2 tunnels on the same 28 network range?

  Options or ideas are welcome.  I had countless sessions with Cisco webex, but do not have access to the hub of the seller.  I can forward suggestions.

  Here's a code

  crypto ISAKMP policy 1
  BA 3des
  md5 hash
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  !
  crypto ISAKMP policy 2
  BA 3des
  preshared authentication
  Group 2

  Crypto ipsec transform-set mytrans aes - esp esp-sha-hmac

  Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 30
  Set transform-set RIGHT

  ISAKMP crypto key address No.-xauth

  interface FastEthernet0/0
  Description $ETH-LAN$$ETH-SW-LAUNCH$$INTF-INFO-FE $ 0/0
  IP 255.255.255.240
  IP access-group 107 to
  IP access-group out 106
  NAT outside IP
  IP virtual-reassembly
  route IP cache flow
  automatic duplex
  automatic speed
  crypto mymap map

  logging of access lists (applied outside to get an idea of what will happen.  No esp traffic happens, he has never hits)

  allowed access list 106 esp host host newspaper
  106 ip access list allow a whole
  allowed access list 107 esp host host Journal
  access-list 107 permit ip host host Journal

  access-list 107 permit ip host host Journal
  107 ip access list allow a whole

  Crypto isa HS her
  IPv4 Crypto ISAKMP Security Association
  status of DST CBC State conn-id slot
    QM_IDLE ASSETS 0 1010

  "Mymap" ipsec-isakmp crypto map 1
  Peer =.
  Extend the 116 IP access list
  access - list 116 permit ip host host (which is a public IP address))
  Current counterpart:
  Life safety association: 4608000 kilobytes / 2800 seconds
  PFS (Y/N): N
  Transform sets = {}
  myTrans,
  }

  OK - so I have messed around the lab for 20 minutes and came up with the below (ip are IP test:-)

  (4) ip nat pool crypto-nat 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.1 prefix length 30 <> it comes to the new address of NAT

  !
  (1) ip nat inside source list 102 interface FastEthernet0/0 overload <> it comes to the interface by default NAT

  !
  IP nat inside source map route overload of crypto-nat of crypto-nat pool <> it is the policy of the NAT function

  !

  (6) access-list 101 permit ip 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255 172.16.2.0 0.0.0.255 <> defines the IP source and destination traffic

  !

  (2) access-list 102 deny ip 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255 172.16.2.0 0.0.0.255 <> does not NAT the normal communication

  (3) access-list 102 deny ip 10.1.1.1 host 172.16.2.0 0.0.0.255 <> does not re - NAT NAT

  (1) access-list 102 permit ip 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255 any <> allows everyone else to use the IP Address of the interface for NAT

  !

  (5) crypto-nat route-map permit 5 <> condition for the specific required NAT
  corresponds to the IP 101 <> game of traffic source and destination IP must be NAT'td

  (7) access list 103 permit ip 10.1.1.1 host 172.16.2.0 0.0.0.255 <> crypto acl

  Then, how the works above, when a package with the what IP 172.16.1.0/24 source wants to leave the router to connect to google, say the source will change to IP interface (1).  When 172.16.1.0/24 wants to talk to172.16.2.0/24, it does not get translated (2).  When the remote end traffic equaled the following clause of NAT - the already NAT'td IP will not be affected again (3) when a host 172.16.1.0/24 wants to communicate with 172.16.2.20/24 we need a NAT NAT specific pool is required (4).  We must define a method of specific traffic to apply the NAT with a roadmap (5) which applies only when the specific traffic (6), then simply define the interesting traffic to the VPN to initiate and enable comms (7) corresponding

• VPN-filer configuration on the VPN traffic

  Hello world

  We set up a site to ipsec with the seller.

  For security reasons we do not want to allow all traffic through the tunnel.

  ASA has 2 interfaces both inside and outside.

  We refuse any one on the external interface ip.

  I have config vpn run ACL to allow traffic on port ssh, icmp through the tunnel.

  Then I applied it under the group policy.

  name of VPN-filter value.

  Need to confirm that I must also allow ipec protocols as esp etc under VPN filter ACL?

  Concerning

  MAhesh

  The vpn-filter is applied to the traffic flowing through the tunnel. You don't need to allow all traffic that 'built' like IKE and IPsec VPN.

  On the SAA, you must also add this traffic to your external ACL is it necessary on IOS routers.

  For the vpn-filter, be aware that the syntax is not

  permit/deny PROTOCOL SOURCE DESTINATION

  It's

  permit/deny PROTOCOL REMOTE LOCAL

  This is relevant when you want to filter traffic from your network to the network of peers.

• Return VPN traffic flows do not on the tunnel

  Hello.

  I tried to find something on the internet for this problem, but am fails miserably. I guess I don't really understand how the cisco decides on the road.

  In any case, I have a Cisco 837 which I use for internet access and to which I would like to be able to complete a VPN on. When I vpn (using vpnc in a Solaris box as it happens which is connected to the cisco ethernet interface), I can establish a VPN and when I ping a host on the inside, I see this package ping happen, however, the return package, the cisco 837 is trying to send via the public internet facing interface Dialer1 without encryption. I can't work for the life of me why.

  (Also note: I can also establish a tunnel to the public internet, but again, I don't can not all traffic through the tunnel.) I guess I'm having the same problem, IE back of packages are not going where it should be, but I do know that for some, on the host being ping well, I can see the ping arriving packets and the host responds with a response to ICMP echo).

  Here is the version of cisco:

  version ADSL #show
  Cisco IOS software, software C850 (C850-ADVSECURITYK9-M), Version 12.4 (15) T5, VERSION of the SOFTWARE (fc4)
  Technical support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
  Copyright (c) 1986-2008 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
  Updated Friday 1 May 08 02:07 by prod_rel_team

  ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.3 (8r) YI4, VERSION of the SOFTWARE

  ADSL availability is 1 day, 19 hours, 27 minutes
  System to regain the power ROM
  System restarted at 17:20:56 CEST Sunday, October 10, 2010
  System image file is "flash: c850-advsecurityk9 - mz.124 - 15.T5.bin".

  Cisco 857 (MPC8272) processor (revision 0 x 300) with 59392K / 6144K bytes of memory.
  Card processor ID FCZ122391F5
  MPC8272 CPU Rev: Part Number 0xC, mask number 0 x 10
  4 interfaces FastEthernet
  1 ATM interface
  128 KB of non-volatile configuration memory.
  20480 bytes K of on board flash system (Intel Strataflash) processor

  Configuration register is 0 x 2102

  And here is the cisco configuration (IP address, etc. changed of course):

  Current configuration: 7782 bytes
  !
  ! Last configuration change at 11:57:21 CEST Monday, October 11, 2010 by bautsche
  ! NVRAM config updated at 11:57:22 CEST Monday, October 11, 2010 by bautsche
  !
  version 12.4
  no service button
  tcp KeepAlive-component snap-in service
  a tcp-KeepAlive-quick service
  horodateurs service debug datetime localtime show-timezone msec
  Log service timestamps datetime localtime show-timezone msec
  encryption password service
  sequence numbers service
  !
  hostname adsl
  !
  boot-start-marker
  boot-end-marker
  !
  logging buffered 4096
  enable secret 5
  !
  AAA new-model
  !
  !
  AAA authentication login local_authen local
  AAA authentication login sdm_vpn_xauth_ml_1 local
  AAA authorization exec local local_author
  AAA authorization sdm_vpn_group_ml_1 LAN
  !
  !
  AAA - the id of the joint session
  clock timezone gmt 0
  clock daylight saving time UTC recurring last Sun Mar 01:00 last Sun Oct 01:00
  !
  !
  dot11 syslog
  no ip source route
  dhcp IP database dhcpinternal
  No dhcp use connected vrf ip
  DHCP excluded-address IP 10.10.7.1 10.10.7.99
  DHCP excluded-address IP 10.10.7.151 10.10.7.255
  !
  IP dhcp pool dhcpinternal
  import all
  Network 10.10.7.0 255.255.255.0
  router by default - 10.10.7.1
  Server DNS 212.159.6.9 212.159.6.10 212.159.13.49 212.159.13.50
  !
  !
  IP cef
  property intellectual auth-proxy max-nodata-& 3
  property intellectual admission max-nodata-& 3
  no ip bootp Server
  nfs1 host IP 10.10.140.207
  name of the IP-server 212.159.11.150
  name of the IP-server 212.159.13.150
  !
  !
  !
  username password cable 7
  username password bautsche 7
  vpnuser password username 7
  !
  !
  crypto ISAKMP policy 1
  BA 3des
  md5 hash
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  !
  crypto ISAKMP policy 2
  BA aes 256
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  !
  crypto ISAKMP policy 3
  BA 3des
  Prior authentication group part 2
  the local address SDM_POOL_1 pool-crypto isakmp client configuration
  !
  ISAKMP crypto client configuration group groupname2
  key
  DNS 10.10.140.201 10.10.140.202
  swangage.co.uk field
  pool SDM_POOL_1
  users of max - 3
  netmask 255.255.255.0
  !
  ISAKMP crypto client configuration group groupname1
  key
  DNS 10.10.140.201 10.10.140.202
  swangage.co.uk field
  pool SDM_POOL_1
  users of max - 3
  netmask 255.255.255.0
  ISAKMP crypto sdm-ike-profile-1 profile
  groupname2 group identity match
  client authentication list sdm_vpn_xauth_ml_1
  ISAKMP authorization list sdm_vpn_group_ml_1
  client configuration address respond
  ISAKMP crypto profile sdm-ike-profile-2
  groupname1 group identity match
  ISAKMP authorization list sdm_vpn_group_ml_1
  client configuration address respond
  !
  !
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-SHA-ESP-3DES-3des esp-sha-hmac
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac ESP_MD5_3DES
  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA aes - esp esp-sha-hmac
  !
  crypto dynamic-map SDM_DYNMAP_1 1
  Set the security association idle time 3600
  game of transformation-ESP-AES-256-SHA
  market arriere-route
  crypto dynamic-map SDM_DYNMAP_1 2
  Set the security association idle time 3600
  game of transformation-ESP-AES-256-SHA
  market arriere-route
  !
  !
  card crypto SDM_CMAP_1 client authentication list sdm_vpn_xauth_ml_1
  map SDM_CMAP_1 isakmp authorization list sdm_vpn_group_ml_1 crypto
  map SDM_CMAP_1 65535-isakmp dynamic SDM_DYNMAP_1 ipsec crypto
  !
  Crypto ctcp port 10000
  Archives
  The config log
  hidekeys
  !
  !
  synwait-time of tcp IP 10
  !
  !
  !
  Null0 interface
  no ip unreachable
  !
  ATM0 interface
  no ip address
  no ip redirection
  no ip unreachable
  no ip proxy-arp
  route IP cache flow
  No atm ilmi-keepalive
  PVC 0/38
  aal5mux encapsulation ppp Dialer
  Dialer pool-member 1
  !
  DSL-automatic operation mode
  waiting-224 in
  !
  interface FastEthernet0
  !
  interface FastEthernet1
  !
  interface FastEthernet2
  !
  interface FastEthernet3
  !
  interface Vlan1
  Description $FW_INSIDE$
  10.10.7.1 IP address 255.255.255.0
  IP access-group 121 to
  no ip redirection
  no ip unreachable
  no ip proxy-arp
  IP nat inside
  IP virtual-reassembly
  route IP cache flow
  map SDM_CMAP_1 crypto
  Hold-queue 100 on
  !
  interface Dialer1
  Description $FW_OUTSIDE$
  the negotiated IP address
  IP access-group 121 to
  no ip redirection
  no ip unreachable
  no ip proxy-arp
  NAT outside IP
  IP virtual-reassembly
  encapsulation ppp
  route IP cache flow
  No cutting of the ip horizon
  Dialer pool 1
  Dialer idle-timeout 0
  persistent Dialer
  Dialer-Group 1
  No cdp enable
  Authentication callin PPP chap Protocol
  PPP chap hostname
  PPP chap password 7
  map SDM_CMAP_1 crypto
  !
  local IP SDM_POOL_1 10.10.148.11 pool 10.10.148.20
  IP local pool public_184 123.12.12.184
  IP local pool public_186 123.12.12.186
  IP local pool public_187 123.12.12.187
  IP local pool internal_9 10.10.7.9
  IP local pool internal_8 10.10.7.8
  IP local pool internal_223 10.10.7.223
  IP local pool internal_47 10.10.7.47
  IP forward-Protocol ND
  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1
  IP route 10.10.140.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.7.2
  !
  no ip address of the http server
  no ip http secure server
  IP nat inside source overload map route SDM_RMAP_1 interface Dialer1
  IP nat inside source static 10.10.7.9 123.12.12.184
  IP nat inside source static tcp 10.10.7.8 22 123.12.12.185 22 Expandable
  IP nat inside source static tcp 10.10.7.8 25 123.12.12.185 25 expandable
  IP nat inside source static tcp 10.10.7.8 80 123.12.12.185 80 extensible
  IP nat inside source static tcp 10.10.7.8 443 123.12.12.185 443 extensible
  IP nat inside source static tcp 10.10.7.8 993 123.12.12.185 993 extensible
  IP nat inside source static tcp 10.10.7.8 123.12.12.185 1587 1587 extensible
  IP nat inside source static tcp 10.10.7.8 8443 123.12.12.185 8443 extensible
  IP nat inside source static 10.10.7.223 123.12.12.186
  IP nat inside source static 10.10.7.47 123.12.12.187
  !
  record 10.10.140.213
  access-list 18 allow one
  access-list 23 permit 10.10.140.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 23 permit 10.10.7.0 0.0.0.255
  Access-list 100 category SDM_ACL = 2 Note
  access-list 100 deny ip any 10.10.148.0 0.0.0.255
  access ip-list 100 permit a whole
  Note access-list 121 SDM_ACL category = 17
  access-list 121 deny udp any eq netbios-dgm all
  access-list 121 deny udp any eq netbios-ns everything
  access-list 121 deny udp any eq netbios-ss all
  access-list 121 tcp refuse any eq 137 everything
  access-list 121 tcp refuse any eq 138 everything
  access-list 121 tcp refuse any eq 139 all
  access ip-list 121 allow a whole
  access-list 125 permit tcp any any eq www
  access-list 125 permit udp any eq isakmp everything
  access-list 125 permit udp any any eq isakmp
  access-list 194 deny udp any eq isakmp everything
  access-list 194 deny udp any any eq isakmp
  access-list 194 allow the host ip 123.12.12.184 all
  IP access-list 194 allow any host 123.12.12.184
  access-list 194 allow the host ip 10.10.7.9 all
  IP access-list 194 allow any host 10.10.7.9
  access-list 195 deny udp any eq isakmp everything
  access-list 195 deny udp any any eq isakmp
  access-list 195 allow the host ip 123.12.12.185 all
  IP access-list 195 allow any host 123.12.12.185
  access-list 195 allow the host ip 10.10.7.8 all
  IP access-list 195 allow any host 10.10.7.8
  not run cdp
  public_185 allowed 10 route map
  corresponds to the IP 195
  !
  public_184 allowed 10 route map
  corresponds to the IP 194
  !
  allowed SDM_RMAP_1 1 route map
  corresponds to the IP 100
  !
  !
  control plan
  !
  !
  Line con 0
  connection of authentication local_authen
  no activation of the modem
  preferred no transport
  telnet output transport
  StopBits 1
  line to 0
  connection of authentication local_authen
  telnet output transport
  StopBits 1
  line vty 0 4
  access-class 23 in
  privilege level 15
  authorization exec local_author
  connection of authentication local_authen
  length 0
  preferred no transport
  transport input telnet ssh
  !
  max-task-time 5000 Planner
  Scheduler allocate 4000 1000
  Scheduler interval 500
  130.88.202.49 SNTP server
  130.88.200.98 SNTP server
  130.88.200.6 SNTP server
  130.88.203.64 SNTP server
  end

  Any help would be appreciated.

  Thank you very much.

  Ciao,.

  Eric

  Hi Eric,.

  (Sorry for the late reply - needed some holidays)

  So I see that you have a few steps away now. I think that there are 2 things we can try:

  1)

  I guess you have provided that:

  IP nat inside source overload map route SDM_RMAP_1 interface Dialer1

  Since the routemap refers to ACL 100 to define the traffic to be translated, we can exclude traffic that initiates the router:

  Access-list 100 category SDM_ACL = 2 Note

  access-list 100 deny ip 123.12.12.185 host everything
  access-list 100 deny ip any 10.10.148.0 0.0.0.255
  access ip-list 100 permit a whole

  Which should prevent the source udp 4500 to 1029 changing port

  OR

  2)

  If you prefer to use a different ip address for VPN,

  Then, you can use a loop like this:

  loopback interface 0

  123.12.12.187 the IP 255.255.255.255

  No tap

  map SDM_CMAP_1 crypto local-address loopback 0

  I don't think you should apply card encryption to the loopback interface, but it's been a while since I have configured something like that, so if you have problems first try and if still does not get the crypto debugs new (isakmp + ipsec on the vpn, nat router on the router of the client package).

  HTH

  Herbert

• Access Web site external AnyConnect

  Guys, I'm trying to allow AnyConnect VPN client to access external Web sites through the ASA (no split tunneling). In other words, I want users connected via VPN to gain access to the internal network, but also to be able to access external Web sites by having that first tunnel traffic to the ASA and then to the internet. I tried the suggestions mentioned in this thread, but not luck. Specifically, I tried adding this statement of nat:

  NAT (outside) 1 192.168.30.0 255.255.255.0

  as well as this one:

  NAT (outside) 1 192.168.30.0 255.255.255.0 outside

  By I had no statement "nat (outside). Unable to access outside sites in these three cases. I have no trouble to access within the network when connected. I issued the sysopt connection VPN-enabled control to ignore the interface of access for vpn users lists. Config is attached (washed). Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Change this line: nat (outside) 1 192.168.30.0 255.255.255.0 outside

  To: nat (outside) 1 192.168.30.0 255.255.255.0

  Global 1 interface (outside) will associate the NAT to the external interface.

  Also make sure you have the traffic that is allowed between the hosts connected to the same interface with this command:

  permit same-security-traffic intra-interface