VPN router to router with overlapping of internal networks

Similar Questions

• VPN IS CONNECTED BUT CANNOT ACCESS THE INTERNAL NETWORK

  I tried to set up a simple customer vpn using this document

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/sw/secursw/ps2308/products_configuration_example09186a00801e71c0.shtml

  VPN IS CONNECTED BUT CANNOT ACCESS THE INTERNAL NETWORK BEHIND "RA"...

  6.3 (5) PIX version

  interface ethernet0 car

  Auto interface ethernet1

  ethernet0 nameif outside security0

  nameif ethernet1 inside the security100

  activate the encrypted password of VmHKIhnF4Gs5AWk3

  VmHKIhnF4Gs5AWk3 encrypted passwd

  hostname VOIPLABPIX

  domain voicelab.com

  fixup protocol dns-length maximum 512

  fixup protocol ftp 21

  fixup protocol h323 h225 1720

  fixup protocol h323 ras 1718-1719

  fixup protocol http 80

  fixup protocol they 389

  fixup protocol rsh 514

  fixup protocol rtsp 554

  fixup protocol sip 5060

  fixup protocol sip udp 5060

  fixup protocol 2000 skinny

  fixup protocol smtp 25

  fixup protocol sqlnet 1521

  fixup protocol tftp 69

  names of

  access-list 101 permit ip 172.10.2.0 255.255.255.0 172.10.3.0 255.255.255.0

  access-list 101 permit ip 172.10.1.0 255.255.255.0 172.10.3.0 255.255.255.0

  access-list 102 permit ip 172.10.2.0 255.255.255.0 172.10.3.0 255.255.255.0

  access-list 102 permit ip 172.10.1.0 255.255.255.0 172.10.3.0 255.255.255.0

  pager lines 24

  Outside 1500 MTU

  Within 1500 MTU

  IP address outside 208.x.x.11 255.255.255.0

  IP address inside 172.10.2.2 255.255.255.0

  alarm action IP verification of information

  alarm action attack IP audit

  IP local pool voicelabpool 172.10.3.100 - 172.10.3.254

  history of PDM activate

  ARP timeout 14400

  NAT (inside) - 0 102 access list

  Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 208.x.x.11 1

  Route inside 172.10.1.0 255.255.255.0 172.10.2.1 1

  Timeout xlate 03:00

  Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0: CPP 02:00 0:10:00 01:00 h225

  H323 timeout 0:05:00 mgcp 0: sip from 05:00 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00

  Sip timeout - disconnect 0:02:00 prompt Protocol sip-0: 03:00

  Timeout, uauth 0:05:00 absolute

  GANYMEDE + Protocol Ganymede + AAA-server

  AAA-server GANYMEDE + 3 max-failed-attempts

  AAA-server GANYMEDE + deadtime 10

  RADIUS Protocol RADIUS AAA server

  AAA-server RADIUS 3 max-failed-attempts

  AAA-RADIUS deadtime 10 Server

  AAA-server local LOCAL Protocol

  Enable http server

  http 172.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 inside

  http 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 inside

  No snmp server location

  No snmp Server contact

  SNMP-Server Community public

  No trap to activate snmp Server

  enable floodguard

  Permitted connection ipsec sysopt

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-aes-256 trmset1, esp-sha-hmac

  Crypto-map dynamic map2 10 set transform-set trmset1

  map map1 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto dynamic map2

  client authentication card crypto LOCAL map1

  map1 outside crypto map interface

  ISAKMP allows outside

  ISAKMP identity address

  part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 10

  ISAKMP policy 10 encryption aes-256

  ISAKMP policy 10 sha hash

  10 2 ISAKMP policy group

  ISAKMP life duration strategy 10 86400

  vpngroup address voicelabpool pool cuclab

  vpngroup dns 204.x.x.10 Server cuclab

  vpngroup cuclab by default-field voicelab.com

  vpngroup split tunnel 101 cuclab

  vpngroup idle 1800 cuclab-time

  vpngroup password cuclab *.

  Telnet timeout 5

  SSH 208.x.x.11 255.255.255.255 outside

  SSH 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 outdoors

  SSH 172.10.1.2 255.255.255.255 inside

  SSH timeout 60

  Console timeout 0

  username labadmin jNEF0yoDIDCsaoVQ encrypted password privilege 2

  Terminal width 80

  Cryptochecksum:b03a349e1ac9e6022432523bbb54504b

  : end

  Try to turn on NAT - T

  PIX (config) #isakmp nat-traversal 20

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_tech_note09186a00807e0aca.shtml#Solution1

  HTH

• VPN connects not to Linksys 10/100 4-port VPN Router with ASA 5505

  We are trying to get a new ASA 5505 implemented on our network after the untimely demise of our router from 1841.  One of the functions of the router that we go back to the top and the race is a pair of VPN for employees that we were working outside.  These are site-to-site virtual private networks.

  They worked with the 1841 in place, so I know the other end works.  I just have configuration problems the ASA to match.  I have been through the wizard in ASDM a couple of times, but have yet to have a bit of luck that it connects.

  Attached are the configuration files for the 1841 (with two virtual private networks) and the 5505 (with only 1 VPN in place).  Can someone help me with what I may be missing to get this working?

  A note: I am having trouble with my NAT (another post in the meantime) configurations, but I think they are close enough that I hope that is not interfering with the VPN.

  If I can get one running, the other has an almost identical game, so I should be able to get the second pretty easily.

  Any thoughts?

  Thank you

  Matt James

  Hello Mjames,

  We hope that you do very well, just to confirm the previous post that I answer for you.

  You need to change the NAT 0 configuration

  NAT (outside) 0-list of access outside_nat0_outbound

  This is the rule against the nat for VPN, please change it to:

  NAT (inside) 0-list of access outside_nat0_outbound

  I spent reviewing the configuration of both devices and which seems to be the only problem

  Please evaluate the useful messages.

  Julio

• Problem VPN site to Site with overlapping networks

  We currently have a PIX 515E firewall as a headboard with many tunnels of site-to-site configured for her with the enpoints of PIX 506. Our internal LAN addressing scheme is 172.18.0.0 255.255.0.0. Addresses of local network in two of the remote networks with congigured VPN site-to-site are 172.18.107.0 255.255.255.224 and 172.18.107.32 255.255.255.0. Remote network access to all services on our internal network very well. We have 20 other network segments configured the same way. The 172.18.107.32.0 network needs to communicate with the 172.18.107.0 network for the services of file on the other remote PIX. Since the station PIX will not allow traffic to leave the same interface it came we thought with him we would just set up a tunnel from site to site between the two remote LAN. After the configuration of the site to another remote firewalls do not appear to try to establish tunnels when sending valuable traffic. I turned on debug for ISAKMP and nothing is either sent or received on a remote Firewall with regard to these tunnels. It's almost like since we already have a tunnel set to our 172.18.0.0 internal LAN that the remote PIX will not build specifically to 172.18.107.0 tunnel. I am able to ping each remote peer with each other and hear protection rules, but nothing has ever been established.

  Is what we are trying to do possible? Sorry for the long post but the kind of a strange scenario. Thanks in advance for any help.

  In what order are the numbers of seqence card crypto for configuring vpn on pix distance units? It could be that you are trying to install is a lot and will be checked later as head of pix. If this is the case, then yes the 172.18/16 road prevail the 172.18.107/24. Try to rebuild the entrance card crypto with a lower number so that traffic to 172.18.107/24 comes first.

  I would like to know how it works.

• VPN client with overlapping of private networks?

  I have a new client who needs to send us data occasionally, we normally install the Cisco VPN Client on their PC, but this client has the same private network, we.

  I know, but it could be done with policy NAT on my 5510 ASA with a VPN site-to site, the customer does not want to change the address or network hardware. They have router cable with no VPN option, and they are unwilling to spend more money on this project.

  Can this work if there is no overlapping of IP addresses?

  Your ACL SHEEP overlaps the static NAT and SHEEP has priority over the static NAT strategy strategy, why it does not work.

  Please kindly remove the following:

  access-list extended sheep allowed ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.240.0 255.255.255.0

• site to site vpn - internal network even on both sides of the tunnel

  Hi all

  I have the following questions about the Site Site VPN using ASA 5510 and 5505

  Scenerio is

  1. we have five branches & headquarters

  2. we want to establish a vpn between branches & Head Office (VPN from Site to Site)

  3. all branches & head office using the same internal network (192.168.150.0 255.255.255.0)

  My question is

  How can I configure VPN site-to-site between branches & head office with the same internal network (192.168.150.0/24)

  Please help me with the configuration steps & explanation

  I have experience on setting up vpn site to site between branches with differnet internal network (for example: 192.168.1.0/24 and 192.168.2.0/24)

  Waiting for your valuable response

  Hello

  Here are a few links on policy nat

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00808c9950.shtml

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a008046f31a.shtml#T10

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00807d2874.shtml

  Concerning

• Configure two Ports on an ASA5510 with 2 different inside networks

  How can I configure two ports on an ASA5510 (version 8.4 (5)) or with 2 different inside networks out interface or two inside and two on the inside outside routing to an outside and inside another for the rest outdoors?

  Specifically, I had all three interfaces with dhcp and basic configuration of all, I got one (10.1.0.0) inside out successfully from the internet (208.83.73.193 for example), but I'm not sure of the second internal interface (192.168.1.0) out to the internet.

  I need VPN or any connection between the two internal networks.

  This is the basic configuration of may:

  interface Ethernet0/0

  nameif Internet

  security-level 0

  IP 208.83.73.x 255.255.255.240

  interface Ethernet0/1

  nameif inside

  security-level 100

  IP 10.1.1.1 255.255.0.0

  interface Ethernet0/2

  Guest Network Interface Description

  nameif GuestNetwork

  security-level 100

  IP 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0

  Route Internet 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 208.83.73.206 1

  Route Internet 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 208.83.73.206 1

  dhcpd address internal 10.1.5.100 - 10.1.5.254

  dhcpd dns 10.1.2.7 10.2.1.200 internal interface

  dhcpd wins 10.1.2.7 interface internal

  interface of lease 432000 dhcpd internal

  field of dhcpd

  xxx.xxxxx.xxxx.gov

  internal interface

  enable dhcpd internal

  dhcpd address 192.168.1.2 - 192.168.1.50 GuestNetwork

  dhcpd dns 208.67.222.222 208.67.220.220 interface GuestNetwork

  enable GuestNetwork dhcpd

  network object obj - 10.1.0.0

  dynamic NAT interface (internal, Internet)

  I tried to configure nat for the guest network the same way that I have it set to the 10.1.0.0 network and also nat static and that it did not work (maybe I did wrong).

  If get this accomplished is possible I would very much apreciate a configuration example of what do I do

  Help, please

  I also found this two articles from Cisco that applies to the ASA Version 8.3 and I guess she could apply to Version 8.4 (5), please let me know if yes:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/product s_configuration_example09186a0080b7c939.shtml

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/product s_configuration_example09186a0080b1ee95.shtml

  Thank you

  two inside networks to one outside is no different to a demilitarized zone and inside outwards. Both come from a security level higher and go to a lower level of security. In your case, there is the second inside network for guest users, I would use a lower level of security as the guest network is probably not as trustworthy as the internal network.

  The second requirement (two inside and two outside) would need a form of routing that the ASA does not support the way in which you want to use based on policy (there are some hacks with NAT, but it's really horrible). That you could use for this are security contexts. A context with inside1/outside1, the other context with inside2/outside2. Here, you can easily route traffic inside2 to outside2 and inside1 to outside1.

  --
  Don't stop once you have upgraded your network! Improve the world by lending money to low-income workers:
  http://www.Kiva.org/invitedBy/karsteni

• Problems with my 4 port Gigabit Security Router with VPN

  OK, I got a wireless router and I have a Web site hosted by 1and1.com and I could connect my fine site. But recently I got the 4 port Gigabit Security Router with VPN and since then I have not been able to connect to it even, I started my own ftp server it always blocks and it will capture everything until she tries to recover the files, then it expires just after a while

  What is the model number of your device? If you have a Web server and an FTP server behind the router, you will need to transfer the ports used by the said request. Ports TCP 80 and TCP 21.

• L2l VPN between ASA with the IP address public and CISCO2911 behind the ISP router with port forwarding

  Hi all

  My apologies if this is a trivial question, but I spent considerable time trying to search and had no luck.

  I encountered a problem trying to set up a temporary L2L VPN from a Subscriber with CISCO2911 sitting behind the router of the ISP of an ASA. ISP has informed that I can't ignore their device and complete the circuit Internet on the Cisco for a reason, so I'm stuck with it. The Setup is:

  company 10.1.17.1 - y.y.y.y - router Internet - z.z.z.z - ISP - LAN - 10.x.x.2 - XXX1 - ASA - 10.1.17.2 - CISCO2911 - 10.1.15.1 LAN

  where 10.x.x.x is a corporate LAN Beach private network, y.y.y.y is a public ip address assigned to the external interface of the ASA and the z.z.z.z is the public IP address of the ISP router.

  I have forwarded ports 500, 4500 and ESP on the ISP router for 10.1.17.2. The 2911 config attached below, what I can't understand is what peer IP address to configure on the SAA, because if I use z.z.z.z it will be a cause of incompatibility of identity 2911 identifies himself as 10.1.17.2...

  ! ^ ^ ^ ISAKMP (Phase 1) ^ ^ ^!
  crypto ISAKMP policy 5
  BA 3des
  md5 hash
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  lifetime 28800
  isakmp encryption key * address no.-xauth y.y.y.y

  ! ^ ^ ^ IPSEC (Phase 2) ^ ^ ^!
  crymap extended IP access list
  IP 10.1.15.0 allow 0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA 3rd-esp esp-sha-hmac
  card crypto 1 TUNNEL VPN ipsec-isakmp
  defined peer y.y.y.y
  game of transformation-ESP-3DES-SHA
  match the address crymap

  Gi0/2 interface
  card crypto VPN TUNNEL

  Hello

  debug output, it seems he's going on IPSEC States at the tunnel of final bud QM_IDLE's.

  What I noticed in your configuration of ASA box, it's that you're usig PFS but not on 2911 router.

  So I suggest:

  no card crypto OUTSIDE_map 4 don't set pfs <-- this="" will="" disable="" pfs="" on="" asa="">

  Then try tunnel initiate.

  Kind regards

  Jan

• VPN site to Site with dynamic routing on ASAs

  I'm planning a backup connection to a primary site if our link main broken through two ASAs using site to site vpn.

  This is what I have resulted to date and just need to work through some issues and best practices.

  ##Regular connectivity and Internet traffic flow "> Primary_Internet".

  Backup_Internet - ASA - CoreA - router-->> Private_Wan<>

  ?? If Private_Wan a link down, use via ASA l2l Internet VPN to connect sites

  x - router - CoreA - ASA-->> VPN l2l<>

  ?? Once the link is available, preferred over the private Wan path must be used.

  A few questions,

  1. can I use a routing via the l2l VPN Protocol? VTI, GRE?

  2. If I enter OSPF or EIGRP, will be the last static use of each work in the ASA redistibuting?

  3. in execution of VPN l2l, using 'show the way' does not show available via the vpn routes, only "crypto ipsec to show his" watch info. Is this correct? If yes how metric would work for routes registered if all the links are up and there are many paths to the same subnet?

  Welllll,

  (2) I would keep as simple as possible, you can put all one VPN perhaps NSSA, if your ASA touch BB.

  (3) IPP on ASA is always the insertion of static routes, it is not the best way to generate the backup.

  Marcin

• VPN does not work with the ip address of overlap?

  When I plugged my adsl router and I have ip address is 10.1.1.1/8 can I use remote access vpn closing on firewall and authentication works very well and I put the ip address of the pool is 10.7.0.1/16 but I can not access this local lan if I made up of my pc and got 2x2.102.x.y ip address then I connected I can't access no problem local network and vpn remote access authentication.

  It is question of routing on pc with overlapping ip or not?

  Please clarify or provide useful link

  Thank you

  Hello

  It seems that it is a problem of nat - t.

  Make sure that the head of VPN network has "isakmp nat - t" (if that's a PIX). If a hub, make sure that "IPsec NAt - T" is enabled.

  Additionally, make sure that on the client, "Enable Transparent tunneling" is checked, with IPSec over UDP NAT/PAT selected.

  HTH,

  -Kanishka

• [Solved] RV082 - SRP527W site-to-site VPN - routing table?

  Hello

  I am trying to create a VPN IPSEC link between 2 offices. The VPN connection is created, and I can connect but only one way.

  Customers in the Office B seems to have a routing problem. Can you help me?

  Details :

  Office:

  -Router SRP527W.

  -Network client: 192.168.0.0 / 24

  -Internal address: 192.168.0.254 / 24

  B office:

  -RV082 router (behind another router)

  -Network client: 192.168.6.0 / 24

  -Internal address: 192.168.6.253 / 24

  -Internal address that goes to the Router 1: 192.168.5.253

  internal address of the Router - 1: 192.168.5.254

  Page layout:

  Office---> SRP527W---> INTERNET<----- global="" router=""><------ rv082="">< office="">

  192.168.0.254 192.168.5.254 5,253 6.254

  Details VPN:

  Office:

  -remote type SUBNET = 192.168.6.0 group / 24

  -local group = SUBNET 192.168.0.0/24

  -Address ID = 82.127.XXX.XXX

  B office:

  -remote type = SUBNET 192.168.0.0/24 Group

  -local group = SUBNET 192.168.6.0 / 24

  -IP address = 192.168.5.253 (accessed from the Internet through the 1st router with the IP 37.1.XXX.XXX)

  Facts:

  A desktop, I can ping everything in 6.0 addresses.

  Office B, I cannot ping anything in 0.0 subnet addresses. The router itself with the diagnostic page, works of ping 192.168.0.1? But no other ping. Curious...

  The desktop computer B routing table shows the following:

  Active routes:

  Destination network mask network Adr. Gateway Adr. interface metric

  0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.6.253 192.168.6.10 10

  127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1

  192.168.6.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.6.10 192.168.6.10 10

  192.168.6.10 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 10

  192.168.6.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.6.10 192.168.6.10 10

  224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.168.6.10 192.168.6.10 10

  255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.6.10 192.168.6.10 1

  255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.6.10 3 1

  255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.6.10 1 40005

  Default gateway: 192.168.6.253

  ===========================================================================

  Persistent routes:

  None

  Tracert from computers to Office B shows that the packages have arrived at 192.168.6.253, and then it never achieved anything.

  The problem is related to the architecture of Office B?

  See the files attached to a layout of Office B and the routing of the router table to Office B.

  Thank you.

  Enable NAT - T on the RPS and configure the remote ID as 192.168.5.253 in the IKE policy.

  Not sure about the RV and if supporting NAT - T.  It can automatically detect the NAT - T, or need to be configured (in this case, you configure the local identification)

  Andy.

• Remote access VPN routing

  Hello

  I'm having a problem on the VPN routing.

  The VPN client is connected correctly to ASA5510, but cannot access inside ASA and the Internet or another network. What I want to achieve is.

  [email protected] / * / -> ASA5520 (public IP)-> Inside (172.16.1.0)

  The VPN address pool uses 172.168.10.0 (I also tried 172.16.1.100 - 120 with the same network from the inside).

  interface GigabitEthernet0/0

  nameif outside

  security-level 0

  IP address a.a.a.a 255.255.255.0

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0/1

  nameif inside

  security-level 100

  IP 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0

  IP local pool vpnpool 192.168.10.1 - 192.168.10.254 mask 255.255.255.0

  access extensive list ip 172.16.1.0 inside_nat0_outbound allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0

  NAT (inside) 0-list of access inside_nat0_outbound

  NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-SHA-ESP-3DES-3des esp-sha-hmac

  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-256-MD5 esp-aes-256 esp-md5-hmac

  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-SHA esp - esp-sha-hmac

  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-MD5 esp - esp-md5-hmac

  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-192-MD5 esp-aes-192 esp-md5-hmac

  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5-esp-3des esp-md5-hmac

  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA 256 - aes - esp esp-sha-hmac

  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA aes - esp esp-sha-hmac

  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-192-SHA esp-aes-192 esp-sha-hmac

  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-128-MD5-esp - aes esp-md5-hmac

  life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800

  Crypto ipsec kilobytes of life - safety 4608000 association

  crypto dynamic-map SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP 65535 pfs Group1 set

  Crypto dynamic-map SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP 65535 value transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA ESP-AES-128-MD5 ESP-AES-192-SHA ESP-AES-192-MD5 ESP-AES-256-SHA ESP-AES-256-MD5 ESP-3DES-SHA MD5-ESP-3DES ESP-DES-SHA ESP-DES-MD5

  outside_map card crypto 65535-isakmp dynamic ipsec SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP

  outside_map interface card crypto outside

  crypto ISAKMP allow outside

  crypto ISAKMP policy 10

  preshared authentication

  3des encryption

  sha hash

  Group 2

  life 86400

  internal VPNstaff group strategy

  attributes of Group Policy VPNstaff

  4.2.2.2 DNS server value

  Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec

  type tunnel-group VPNstaff remote access

  attributes global-tunnel-group VPNstaff

  address vpnpool pool

  Group Policy - by default-VPNstaff

  IPSec-attributes tunnel-group VPNstaff

  pre-shared-key *.

  Hello

  A quick test, try this.

  -Turn on nat - t (if its disable)

  Command: crypto isakmp nat-traversal 20

  see if it helps.

  If not,

  -Run a continuous ping from the client to the ASA inside the interface, make sure that you run the command 'management-access to inside' before you start with the ping.

  -Time our RESPONSE ICMP or inside the interface... ?

  If time-out, then

  -Check the number of decrypts using the command "show crypto ipsec his"

  If ICMP response to inside interface is received by the VPN client.

  -Ping to an internal host behind the ASA.

  -"Show crypto ipsec his"

  IF you have received responses if first test then here you should see decrypts number increases.

  -Apply the catches on the inside of the interface

  You can consult the document below

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_tech_note09186a0080a9edd6.shtml

  -If you see the package source as VPN client interface to reach the inside interface for the destination of the host behind the ASA, then its a problem with your routing internal.

  In case you have an L3 device connected to the ASA inside the interface, make sure that you have a route for GW subnet 192.168.1.x as ASA inside the interface i.e. 172.16.1.1 score

  If his L2 or a dumb device, then as a quic test, make the following statement of the road using the command-line in windows on the host computer behind the asa participant in this test.

  route add 192.168.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0 172.16.1.1

  Please let me know if it helps.

  Concerning

  M

• Best Soho - Split Tunnel VPN router

  Hi - I'm looking for some advice for a soho router.

  Basically the main feature, I'm looking for is to run, which I think is a VPN split tunnel, so that all internal clients route default traffic out to the gateway of the ISP. However, if the traffic is destined for a list of several specific subnets (x.x.x.x/24, y.y.y.y/24 etc.), then it should establish a tunnel to an only PPTP/IPSEC host and route remote traffic for these subnets via the tunnel.   To be clear, that these subnets (x.x.x.x and y.y.y.y) is not attached to the end of the tunnel - which is a gateway device that will route them further.

  I've been watching the various VPN router offers and is not clear to me if I can do it with a RV - 042, BEFVP41 or something like the other thing SRP521W I must be able to manipulate the routing tables directly on.

  As an additional note, I have complete control over the end of SOHO - but simply an account at the end of the tunnel with (it is a service provider).  The idea is to use public services for 90% of the traffic, but if customers want to access a specific set of addresses, it will forward this specific traffic through the tunnel.

  Thanks in advance...

  On current view, do not touch the RPS with a bargepole.

  Adding access to additional subnets through a VPN tunnel is pretty standard, routing will be automatic if the VPN was established, but you must ensure that

  1. politics VPN at BOTH ENDS allows your local subnet to access these networks

  2. your subnet is not incompatible with other subnets or roads that can be used on remote networks

  3. assuming you're OK so far, remote subnets must have a route is added to the default gateway to point to your subnet via intermediate networks

  Good luck!

• Site to Site VPN router

  I have worked with establishing a VPN from Site to Site and while I can get the configuration of the tunnel and I am able to ping across the tunnel. I'm unable to use the DNS server of the remote side of the tunnel. I can ping the server and otherwise access via TCP/IP but if I try to use nslookup our ping by name he will not resolve on the configuration of IPSEC. I tried to add the domain information to the DNS of the PC configuration and then I can ping the server by name, but NSlookup is still unusable. I also tried to use the easy VPN server / method of the Client on the routers. I am able to use VPN on a PC client and initiate a connection (Internet) and I get the DNS information on the main site and all right. But by using the client to router on the other side, I can't solve DNS via the connection. Here's a brief example of Config.

  Router A - Main Site

  Internal network - 172.16.1.x

  Router B - Site B

  Internal network - 172.16.3.x

  I was able to ping the subnets, but internal DNS resolution does not work for me. I can post if necessary more detailed configs.

  Thank you

  Dwane

  I did not go to the question of having two tunnels GRE and the VPN server easy at first because I did not only and cannot say with authority that the combination works or not. My opinion is that it should work. I don't quite know which would prevent the combination of work. Perhaps someone with experience with this or someone from Cisco can talk about it.

  HTH

  Rick