Vulnerability CVE-2015-7547 glibc on SRA series

Similar Questions

• Fixed CVE - 2015 - 4289 AnyConnect version

  Hello

  I have a small question on the AnyConnect versions that should be made to fix bug CSCut93920. The bug notes state that the fix is available in version 3.1 (10010) and 4.1 (4011). I found version 3.1 (10010), however, there is no version 4.1 (4011). That which is available for download is 4.1 (04011). Is this just a typing error on the Cisco download site? The reason I ask is because bug and the CVE-2015-4289 notes state that all 4.1 (0) version are vulnerable.

  Thank you

  Martin

  Martin,

  Go! We are competing for 0? Literally 'nothing '? :-)

  Well, the problem of how we are numbering communicated internally.

  (This is to be taken with a grain of salt) 4011 is equal to 4011TH internal reconstruction, the problem is that often we go to 5 digits, I think we've been there with AC 3.1. If some tools will display 04011 and some even rebuilt as 4011.

  screen_shot_2015-08 - 13_at_12.34.28.png

  

  Inconsistent, Yes, but above all aesthetic.

  M.

• Vulnerability CVE-2016-5340 blackBerry Smartphones

  On my STV100-4 with the last patch on 5 August, with AAG111 installed, it still shows a vulnerability CVE-2016-5340 when I run the scanner QuadRooter of Check Point. The latest patch AAG111 should remove the vulnerability CVE-2016-5340. It is the scanner that show the wrong result or?. It is with the same question?

  Appreciate any comments!

  barconsult wrote:

  On my STV100-4 with the last patch on 5 August, with AAG111 installed, it still shows a vulnerability CVE-2016-5340 when I run the scanner QuadRooter of Check Point. The latest patch AAG111 should remove the vulnerability CVE-2016-5340. It is the scanner that show the wrong result or?. It is with the same question?

  Appreciate any comments!

  Hi @barconsult

  I can confirm that you are patched since you are on AAG111.

  Please see the following that we have added to our article on this problem.

  38385 BSRT-2016-007 vulnerability in Qualcomm impact BlackBerry kernel driver powered by Android sm...

  A third-party application reports a version as vulnerable when the consultative document lists it as not affected. Why is this?

  BlackBerry is not responsible for third-party applications, but is aware that some applications check the versions of component instead of trying to reproduce a vulnerability. Because this approach does not take into account differences in specific implementations, it is possible for these tests to give a false positive reaction. BlackBerry has tested these patches and I can confirm that hotfix versions that are listed in this notice are not affected by problems of QuadRooter, including ASHmenian hell.

• How do I know when CVE-2015-5119 is corrected by Adobe?

  Hey all,.

  I recently discovered the flaw of security for Adobe Flash Player, called CVE-2015-5119. (Adobe security bulletin)

  Does anyone know how Adobe will publish the information that the security flaw is fixed?

  Thank you

  Hi Fire4564,

  The security update was published.  Please see the view and Security Bulletins.  This page contains a link to sign up to receive security notifications, which include notifications when security updates are released.

  Please post here if you have problems to download the new version.

  Thank you.

  --

  Maria

• Vulnerability CVE-2013-3749 in Oracle EBS

  Hi all

  
  

  How solve this vulnerability CVE-2013-3749 in Oracle EBS other that to apply the patch JUL2013 CPU, as shown in the link, below, is it possible that we can trace/identify and update accordingly, log files or tables where information is trapped in the place as part of this vulnerability?

  Package Oracle Critical Patch Update - July 2013

  Thank you

  Moor

  You can find some details in (potential Logging of E-Business Suite Passwords (Doc ID 1579709.1)).

  Thank you

  Hussein

• Vulnerability CVE-2012-1723 Java and ColdFusion.

  I have a few questions about Coldfusion, especially for me 9.0.1, about Java.  I've updated the JVM for Coldfusion in the past due to a vulnerability to a version that has been sanctified by Adobe to use, version 1.6.0_24.  It is vulnerability: CVE-2010-4476

  It is first of all a particular vulnerability, CVE-2012-1723, which applies to the Coldfusion server?  Second, what is the current version of Java sanctified by Adobe?  Finally, what are the consequences of the use of a version not sanctified Java with Coldfusion?

  Adobe has not 'certified' ColdFusion 9 on a newer version of the JVM as version 1.6.0_24. The unofficial word on the street is that Adobe support will still work with you if you have a new JAVA virtual machine, although they could ask to eat at 1.6.0_24.   Adobe has certified only a new version of a machine virtual JAVA outside of a major release twice as I remember, when was the first time the day light savings time rules changed, and the second was the vulnerability of denial that exists in versions prior to 1.6_0_24.  Adobe will support Java 7 CF9 and 10 due to the EOL Java6 according to this blog entry: http://blogs.coldfusion.com/post.cfm/java-7-support-for-coldfusion Vulnerability CVE-2012-1723 allows to bypass the java security sandbox, so maybe it's something you'd be worried on a ColdFusion server. If you have turned on sandbox security.

• WebLogic vulnerability: CVE-2010-0073

  Hello guys,.
  Oracle announced a vulnerability CVE-2010-0073.
  Link:
  http://www.Oracle.com/technology/deploy/security/alerts/alert-CVE-2010-0073.html
  
  I'm not using nodemanager, do I still have to apply this hotfix. In addition, don't know if I need to apply the patch to 10 mp1?
  
  any suggestions?

  I always recommend to contact support if you have any questions about the vulnerability or the patch.

  I read this earlier and there seems to be a vulnerability specifically with Node Manager. So if you use it, which means that a Node Manager process runs, it seems to me that you may be ok. Windows install will ask to install Node Manager as a Service during installation, even if you're not thinking that you use, check again. Don't trust me, I slept in a Holiday Inn Express last night. Finally, check with the Support of Oracle.

• patch for the vulnerability CVE-2016-0953 on photoshop 13.0

  Hello

  Where can I find the patch to correct vulnerabilities - 0953-2016-CVE CVE - 2012 - 027, CVE-2016-0952, CVE-2016-0951 for photoshop 13.0?

  Help > updates watch "your applications are all up to date.

  Help, please

  concerning

  Badiss

  You will not. Photoshop CS6 does never update.  Creative Cloud now includes Creative Suite Master Collection and Design Premium features

  Adobe - Photoshop: For Windows

  2013 was the last update. Camera Raw is stopped to 9.1.1

• Microphone Realtek audio driver fails in Skype on 2015 DELL Inspiron 15 7000 series

  Hello world

  I'm having a problem with the Realtek microphone in Skype.

  The symptoms are:

  Shortly after the beginning of the conversation, the other party can not hear my voice. Video is fine, the voice of the other party is also very good.

  When it produced the green bar microphone in the Options settings / audio will not be seen speaking into it.

  However, I can hear what is said into the microphone from the speakers the.

  I uninstalled the microphone in the Manager, re-installed the driver, did not help.

  Uninstalled Realtek hi def audio driver. This helped first but then after 4 minutes speaking the problem comes back again.

  I can see that in this case the speaker icon in

  Control Panel\Hardware and Sound\manage devices\recording\microphone\microphone audio properties\levels

  is barred. If I uncross it and put increased and a level higher than zero the other party can hear me again.

  This happens spontaneously, by himself. Even without running Skype, it is so why I think it might be a driver problem.

  Any ideas? (please no advice "reinstalled the driver" - did several times)

  It seems to me that it is resolved. A ran malware bytes, stuff cleaned, rebooted.

  Works now.

  PS. This is my dad's computer... McAffee doesn't help much, especially when 'you are your best antivirus' strategy is not respected :)

• Firefox is declining as being vulnerable even though I installed the latest version of Adobe Flash Player. Why is this?

  I have the latest version of Adobe Flash installed 18.0.0.203 - this is confirmed on the adobe site and the Firefox Add-ons page. Yet I continue to get the message saying that Flash Player is vulnerable...

  All versions of the Flash plugin was disabled by Mozilla because of a security breach disclosed in the plugin that Adobe needs to address via a security update.

  • https://helpx.Adobe.com/security/products/Flash-Player/apsa15-04.html
  • bug 1182751 - vulnerable versions of Blocklist (CVE-2015-5122) of the Flash Player plugin (18.0.0.203 and less)

  Please, do not comment in bug reports
  https://Bugzilla.Mozilla.org/page.cgi?id=etiquette.html

  • https://support.Mozilla.org/KB/why-do-i-have-click-Activate-plugins

• Using 36 FF but still get the message on tests of vulnerability for hack "Freak."

  "Attention!" Your client is vulnerable to CVE-2015-0204. Even if your client does no suites RSA to EXPORT, it can still be fooled into using one of them. We encourage you to upgrade your client. "

  https://nakedsecurity.Sophos.com/2015/03/04/the-freak-bug-in-tlsssl-what-you-need-to-know/

  "As far as we know, the trick does not work against TLS implementations used by Microsoft, Google and Mozilla.

  If the users of Internet Explorer, chrome/Chrome and Firefox are OK. »

  This affects pretty much just Android users default browser on older versions of Android, Safari users and browsers old and obsolete. Users using Firefox 36 as safe from this attack (at least insofar as it is currently understood)

• Why a vulnerability with Adobe Flash Player?

  I understand that there was a problem with the latest version of Adobe Flash Player and thought that Adobe had made a patch with the latest 0296. When I've updated, however, status of Mozilla plugin tells me that there is a vulnerability. Someone else has had this problem and if so, how do solve you this problem?

  According to the revision of the https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsa15-02.html made today.

  UPDATE (February 4): users who have enabled auto-update to the desktop Flash Player runtime will receive version 16.0.0. 305 from February 4. This version includes a fix for CVE-2015-0313. Adobe expects to have an update is available for manual download on February 5, and we work with our distribution partners to make the update available in Google Chrome and Internet Explore 10 and 11. For more information about the update of Flash Player, please refer to this post.

• vulnerability of desirialization of vRO7.0

  There is the vulnerability desirialization on Apache common in 6.0.x and 5.5.x vRO Collections as we can see in the following KB:

  VMware KB: Solve the vulnerability of deserialization for embedded vRealize Orchestrator 6.0.x and 5.5.x (CVE-2015-...

  Is - this KB VMware applicable to the vRO 7.0?

  7.0 is not vulnerable. See: VMSA-2015-0009 | United States

• New Kernel Exploit (CVE-2016-0728)

  Looks like there is a pretty serious feat in the Linux kernel:

  http://Linux.Slashdot.org/story/16/01/19/1326212/serious-Linux-kernel-vulnerability-patched

  http://perception-point.IO/2016/01/14/analysis-and-exploitation-of-a-Linux-Kernel-Vulnerability-CVE-...

  Requires local access or a malicious application ReadyNAS units are likely to be more vulnerable if they got installed add-ons. Might be interesting to try to drag an update in the next RC.

  Hello

  We have addressed this in OS 6.4.2.

  To come

• MITM Dell idrac openssl vulnerability

  Hello

  Nessus allows us to analyze our network. My most recent scan reports several openssl vulnerabilitis with a cvss score of 9.3, (note: HIGH), see below for more details. Found products are affected:

  Reference Dell idrac6 1.97

  Dell idrac7 1.57.57

  Nessus says that the possibility is confirmed, and the openssl version could also be vulnerable to the other openssl release questions the same day as the OpenSSL ' ChangeCipherSpec' MiTM vulnerability"released on June 5.

  If this is confirmed by dell? patches will be released for this fault?

  CVE-2010-5298, CVE-2014-0076, CVE-2014-0195, CVE-2014-0198, CVE-2014-0221, CVE-2014-0224, CVE-2014-3470

  Here's what I received the answer from Dell to the Openssl vulnerability.

  After a few calls to the help desk here is what I get for my iDRAC7 fighting flag of Foundstone security for vulnerability CVE-2014-0224scans:

  "The package OPEN SSL used here contains several components, you do not use the component that is vulnerable and affected, other components in this package are used but are not vulnerable".

  "Dell has determined that the products listed in the attached document are not affected by the problems.  Some products generated a module OpenSSL older (but not vulnerable).  This could be marked by a scanner.  "Dell is currently working to update the modules on a version that will not be reported for these issues.

  I also tried to download the document, I hope I can be read or downloaded.

  If this post has helped you please note.

  Thank you

  2376.Dell - ResponseOpenSSLSecurityAdvisory_05_June_2014_final.pdf