Why ASO described so great?

Can someone explain why the contours of the ASO are so great? I have two lines on the server and they are two 225 MB. I even opened an and deleted all the dimensions and then saved on my drive c:\ local and it's still 225 MB... I'm confused as to why on gods Earth that might be?

New to the ASO and perhaps do not understand something fundamental.

the utility can be run in any event. to compact the real contour or to make a copy of it to use later (perhaps to replace the original sketch). I have run the utility on use exposes several times and have not had any problems. But to skeptics, I suggest first of all run on a copy and be amazed at how the contour compact.

When you add/remove plus members, the sketch will develop and will need to be repacked. I include it as part of a regular maintenance routine. It actually does not take very long

Edited by: GlennS_3 may 3, 2012 07:56

Tags: Business Intelligence

Similar Questions

  • Why is he so great?

    Hello:

    I had some problems when I use the Qt for playbook SDK.

    1. the applications developed by creator qr is very great.

    The helloworld example also is 80.2 M.

    Why? I don't know, I'm so confused.

    2. How can I get the *.bar after completing the application?

    Who can tell me? Thank you very much.

    Inside your project, make new folder named "lib".

    Inside this folder put the libraries you use in my Qt Quick projects, there are: libQtCore.so.4 libQtDeclarative.so.4 libQtGui.so.4, libQtNetwork.so.4, libQtOpenGL.so.4, libQtScript.so.4,

    libQtSql.so.4, libQtSvg.so.4, libQtXml.so.4, libQtXmlPatterns.so.4

    In your file of bar - descriptor.xml replace this line:

    lib
    

    with

    lib
    

    Now your .bar file should be about 13 MB, which is Ok. Of course, put only the libraries you use inside the folder "lib."

  • Why keep you removing GREAT features as multi-frames and vector paint?

    The software is not everything becomes faster and each CC version has less and less. AFX is back to not using all the processors again.

    "The new architecture will allow a future version of After Effects to use CPU and RAM threads more effectively simultaneous multiple images rendering functionality could never."

    WHY? It worked fine in the latest version of 2014!

    Stop this!

    Pain of vector is a huge loss and now this?

    Please start treating your base as professionals who really RELY on your software users!

    Javier Castro wrote:

    The new architecture will allow a future version of After Effects to use threads processor and RAM more efficiently than the simultaneous multiple images rendering feature ever could. »

    WHY? It worked fine in the latest version of 2014!

    No, it wasn't. There were a number of effects or even some EXPRESSIONS that would kill multiprocessing. Seriously - the wrong kind of expression could kill and do all the rendering on a single heart. Good luck to know which of your layers in all your precomps to the offending phrase!

    Multiprocessing was a hack several decades old to try to make architecture of ageing of EI to use multi-core processors. When it worked, it was nice, but the system was NOT "fine." In fact, if you have spent a lot of time on these forums over the last years the chorus "broken multiprocessing" would be rather familiar to your ears.

    There are a few pieces of good news:

    1. There is a new version in preparation that will be better than the old. (Finally!)

    2. you can always use multiprocessing now. Simply, open a project in CC 2014 (even if it was created by 2015 CC) and make the. That's what I do. I do use the term better handling, more vivid interface, etc. in 2015 CC, then (if it's a project that would use multiprocessing), I visited in 2014 CC.

  • Why BMPS are so great?

    MoE

    dumb and old format does not use babes

  • CP5 - screenshots are 4 MB, why it is so great

    Hi all

    I just upgraded to CP5 and when I recorded something in automatic mode later, I noticed these slide background images in the library. they are a piece of 4 MB. I was looking around the settings and preferences to see if I could change that. These files are large quiet.

    Is it possible to influence this?

    Thank you and have a nice weekend

    Peter

    Hello

    To add to the answer of Rod: If you really want to limit the size of the file, choose the lowest resolution possible for your capture. I don't think your capture performed to more than 1024 x 768 resolution, either? When captured to 970 x 600 background images are around 2, 4 MB large. But it is indeed the size of the resulting file of the published SWF file that is important, and this can be influenced by the quality of the blade and the audio quality settings.

    Lilybiri

  • Why page load too great in internet explorer?

    I am responsible for a student Web site project.  The students do their webpages in Kompozer and I edit in Dreamweaver (CS4).  They display correctly using safari and firefox, but today I had to use IE to display the final results to the students.  Most of the pages loaded fine, but a load such as a very large page with a scroll down bar.  I don't know what is different on the code in this particular page which causes which, or would it be a matter of too much graphic background?  The page can be found at:

    http://www.Hawaii.Hawaii.edu/nursing/RNHawaiian10.html

    Assistance amendments of the code or how to solve the problem would be appreciated.  I would like the page to fit the screen viewers so that they can see the entire width without having to scroll left/right.

    If you have your image as a background image and set the container or the element, it is 100%, then he must fill the width, provided that the image is large enough.

    So if you have an image that is 1500px wide as a background image in a

    that is to say of 1000px wide, would show only 1000px.

    The norm for us, the page is 960px wide, give or take a little.  This allows a computer with a screen resolution of 1024 to view the entire width without scrolling.

    Gary

  • Why index has a greater than its table dimension

    I have a table with 25 columns, but most of the columns is zero except the primary key. Dba_tables and dba_indexes, I worked on that the primary key index has 309 MB and has 280 MB table.

    Suppose the index blocks contains the key identifier and table indexes, and blocks of table contains its data in the column and the rowid. If this is true, the primary key index should has the same size as the table which is null everything except the primary key. How is my index is 10% larger than the table?

    An index is a B-tree +, where B is balanced.
    It consists of blocks of leaf and nonleaf.
    Blocks not sheet are a kind of pre-Selection mechanism, to avoid, consider all the blocks of leaves.
    Buy a book on data structures and/or to read the Oracle documentation you will see it explained in detail.
    If you issue
    analyze the index validate structure;
    and
    question
    Select * from index_stats;
    right after that, you will see how many levels have the index.
    This allows the 10% overload.
    Also the data blocks contain no ROWID.

    ------------
    Sybrand Bakker
    Senior Oracle DBA

  • Why is my user library so great?

    My MS user lib is 25 MB, even if there is only a handful of parts.  My corp lib is 14 MB with hundreds, maybe thousands, of pieces.  Why is he so great?

    Is it swelled with the space that has not been recovered?  Is there a way to rebuild and return to the size?

    Thank you.

    You can clean your user database while preserving your structure using the database merge option (Tools > database > fusion Database).

    (1) close Multisim

    (2) move your current database of the user to a new location

    (3) beginning Multisim (this should generate a new database user in the directory where the old one was)

    (4) merge the original database in the database of the user.

    This should clean up all non related data while preserving the original formatting all of your database.

    However, make sure doublecheck that all of your data has been successfully transferred before removing the original database, as this can update pieces that were created in older versions.

  • Why is my VM so great? How can I reduce the size?

    I started several years with over a VM in XP Pro OS X 10.5 (currently OS X 10.6.8 Fusion 4.1.2), which has grown to about 15 GB of 2 GB. Shrink brought up to about 13 or 14 GB.

    I only use the VM for QuickBooks Pro and casual browser tests. Not to mention that QuickBooks, my additional applications only are Microsoft Security Essentials, CC Cleaner, Primo PDF, Firefox and Safari. The only document that I keep on the virtual machine is the current QuickBooks company file. I use instant No.

    So, my question is, why my VM so great? How indigestion can be removed?

    Thank you

    David

    P.S. - I think I figured out how to see the size of the disk in Windows Explorer > workstation > disc Local (c). Capacity is 19.9 GB, is 11.7 GB used space and free space is 8.24 GB.

    Post edited by: davidb2 (added P.S.)

    First of all, I was just a point and the disk image hard virtual is strictly only with Windows XP Professional SP3 installed with the standard Microsoft Defaults and no additional software applications like Microsoft Office etc.   It is not unreasonable for a fully installed system (Windows XP and user Applications) to consume more than 2 GB, but the real problem is that David started with a Virtual Machine that has been much lower, then it is now and it must be understood that it is unfortunately quite normal for the drive to become bloated and if it was just a normal physical system probably , would not be a problem though because it is a Machine virtual use of space on the host, it is a question.   He has some choice, learn how to remove what is not really necessary, or perform a clean build, which will be initially much smaller the current even if virtual machine it to finally happen in size unless the indigestion is controlled along the way.

  • Why is the size of my PDF from my InDesign export still big?

    I'm doing a class project which is a document of four pages, the seven-image with very little text. The project must be submitted as a PDF under 300 KB. However, when I export the document to the title of the smallest size of predefined file and with the compression up to 72 dpi, I get a PDF file that is 612 KB.

    All my classmates are able to get less than 300 KB, so I'm confused as to why mine is so great. I use 5 2 gif and jpg files and each take a in 5 by 5 inch paper square. They are relatively very small photos (approx. 250 KBS) and I have re-saved everything to be less than 100 KB, but the PDF size only drops to about 500ko I transferred between CC InDesign on Mac and InDesign CS5 on Windows and I wonder if this is a problem.

    Just wanted to share the results, in case someone falls on this forum in the future.

    Layout of danegonzalezfour-page InDesign, seven black and white images have been used.  Three pages contained two 5 "5" with images of seven lines of text under each image and the last page had one set of image-description of similar sizes.  A check of the PDF made on Acrobat (below) shows that the images made up the majority of the size of the file.

    Since the images have some detail, I thought that changing their file type would be the best way to create a more compact PDF file and preserve the integrity of the images.  So I cropped the images to the size and saved PNG 24-bit files.  Even if the PNG files are larger than the originals, he gave good results PDF.  Here are the results of the audit of the PDF update after using predefined default to InDesign "smallest file size".

    I am happy that we managed to solve this problem.

  • Creating files of great Lightroom cr_sdk_*.tmp

    I use Lightroom 4.1 RC2 on 64-bit Windows 7. My C: drive is an SSD and roughly 8 GB free. My catalogue and Lightroom cache are configured to live on my drive F: However, so I would not have thought that this would be a problem.

    What I see is after an hour or so of editing (in module development only), I have run out of space on my C: drive that causes Lightroom out and other instability of the general system (for example Windows Explorer matrices). Looks like Lightroom to create large files in my temp (C:\Users\ < username > \AppData\Local\Temp) for example called cr_sdk_03182513.tmp directory.

    What these files are for and why they are so great? Can I set up Lightroom to store elsewhere (ideally without moving my temp dir)?

    http://forums.Adobe.com/message/4355507

    or

    http://forums.Adobe.com/message/4334670

  • white screen: why no content?

    My page is coming with only the bottom of the body and nothing else. Can someone check my coding errors?

    Thank you!

    Quote:
    Posted by: brégent
    > And why now in FF and Netscape, when it wasn't before?

    Try to clear manually.

    Yes, it worked. I feel stupid - I would have thought that :-) This is why you are so great!

  • Confusion of (g7-1260us pavilion) HP system recovery

    I have a computer portable pavilion g7-1260us, installed at the factory windows 7

    I'm having some internet connection problems, but I write really just on the recovery process.  I've owned laptops HP before and know the Recovery Manager is running.  The hard drive (HD) has 3 partitions.  The 'local' OS partition plus a "Recovery" partition a partition of 'HP_Tools '.

    I did a search from the Start button and found HP Recovery Manager, which I ran.  I want to run repressive recovery, but since the screen title it says "(personnes à mobilité réduite: Pleasue utiliser un support de récupération pour restaurer votre système)". "  I've owned the laptop about 6 months but never did no recovery media and there is just no prerequisites windows created restore points.

    Sullen I can restore this laptop to factory, right?  Otherwise, why have such a great recovery partition?  I considered running the "creation of Media Recovery" to make the DVDs, but to my knowledge that creates an image of the system as-it-now-is, rather than just creating DVDs that will restore a fresh factory setting.

    Is there a way to do a "system recovery" despite the possibility of being disabled?  Peroxide of hydrogen used to have an option to perform a recovery of 'factory' which to me is an exaggeration, but I consider that if it were possible.

    What are my options?  Thank you.

    Hello

    You are welcome

    You're right, that all methods of HP recovery will install all the necessary drivers.

    If you are doing a new installation, Windows 7 does a good job of installing most of the necessary drivers, but you will almost always install the drivers for the card reader and Intel Management Engine Interface from HP.

    Regarding the current connection problem, from what you describe, I would say that by far the most likely cause is a damaged or misconfigured McAfee installation.  As with most security software, the option to stop scanning and real-time components will not completely disable the software.

    I try to completely uninstall McAfee, restart the computer and see if it now connects to the Internet - if not always connect. in the Menu start, open the all programs, open accessories, right-click on command prompt and select "run as Administrator".  In at the prompt, type the following command and press ENTER.

    ipconfig/all                     (Note that there is a space between ipconfig and /).

    Copy the results in this window by right-clicking and choosing "Select all", hold down the CTRL key and press C, open Notepad, press and hold Ctrl and press V to paste the results.  Copy and paste these details with your next post.

    Kind regards

    DP - K

  • Two backup machines, we work, we have no

    Another experience of hair pulling. I noticed that my MacBook Pro had not saved for several days. A few days later, I tried to understand why. I have failed and need help/guidance. I think he started his problems after I installed 10.11.4, but I can't be sure.

    Apple Time Capsule (APTC), iMac connected cable, MBP connected by cable. The two machines running 10.11.4. APTC guests wi - fi, but turned off on both computers.

    Network settings on the computers look identical.

    APTC can be connected to the internet or not. Same results.

    On both machines, I can copy (drag / move) a file/folder of the APTC partition in the finder, and it happens immediately.

    iMac backup normally, from one day to the next, with no problems.

    MBP prepares backup (30 GB - don't know why, it's this great) for two hours and began transmitting at a pace I calculate will take 5-10 days to complete.

    I have:

    -Run the MBP disk utility, corrected some errors found, now clean tracks

    -Reinstall 10.11.4 the combo charger

    -people with mobility reduced/removed various demons/startup process that seem like they may interfere

    -no antivirus program

    -check the console as backup log starts and progresses, and don't see anything that stands out

    -Manual backup with time machine power, both exhibit the same slow performance.

    Seems to boil down to Time Machine somehow, since all the other communal work. I turned TM, then turn it on again, re-slected my backup drive; There seems to be little to do with it.

    I don't know where to go from here - what to try next. Help?

    Ben

    You have tried most of what I would say.

    It's time for the big guns... Delete the backup... and reset TM, and start over.

    I don't know why it's necessary, but it is. TM just gets stuck and no response.

    As ways to work around the problem without taking major measures.

    Plug a USB on the MBP and TM allows to make a local backup... If it works fine, it proves several things... most TM works, just not to the objectives of the network.

    If you upgraded the MBP several times... make a NVRAM and reset the SMC... It can help.

    Finally I would buy Carbon Copy Cloner and use it. It is simply much more reliable than TM, if not quite as competent in the management of incremental backups.

    I use CCC and TM... I think that there is a good place to use both.

  • HP Envy curves 34-AO51 signature Edition: won't start after the mode 'sleep'.

    HP Envy curve signature 34-AO51 edition:

    After that my brand new computer starts in mode 'sleep' it will not restart without unpluging it and restart. Coming from a mac, it's ben very frustraiting... any recommendations? all the drivers have been manually updated.

    Hello again @Judochop,

    I replied to your other post yesterday, but this one has additional information that was not in the other...

    What you describe looks great the effects of quick start. You can try turning it off.  Please see: the Pros and Cons Windows 10 "quick commissioning" Mode - howtogeek.com, How to Turn On or Off quick startup in Windows 10 - tenforums.com.

    Please let me know if it works for you and if it does not solve your problem, please mark this message as a solution. Bravo would be appreciated as well.

Maybe you are looking for

  • HP HPE337C answer DVD Blu - Ray?

    HPE337C answer DVD Blu - Ray?

  • Conversion of a NPN signal to a signal of 0/5V TTL

    I'm trying to connect a Photosensor Omron DAQ NI9401 carte.  The photoelectric sensor is a signal of low voltage NPN.  In my view, there is a way to build a circuit which allows to convert the signal of NPN signal 0/5V TTL necessary.  However, I'm no

  • Forget my email password and live account recovery

    Separated from this thread. Sir, I forgot my account password and recovery by email which can make Note from Moderator: personal data has been deleted *.

  • Cannot synchronize rca mc4002 to wmp.

    I can't wmp to recognize my device. Even when I plug the and choose to synchronize, it does not work. Windows says its compatible, I have installed the cd and reinstalled. My computer lists under 'My Computer' it shows all of the files in the folder.

  • having problems with cut and paste - picture is black

    Original title: copy / paste black blob Hi... I have a problem with sometimes to cut and paste where I eventually stick no more that a "black blob" that seems to be a chart... that is, it can be stretched in a big black blob. Seems to happen especial