Why is updating such a mystery?

Similar Questions

• Why the updates remove my options and search parameters

  The latest update deleted my home page, the options, and my Google search engine!
  Why are updated the cause? This will continue to happen in the future updates?

  I'm sorry to hear that, after an update to Firefox as one of your search engines were missing. In order to add this back, it is possible to follow these instructions:

  • Add the search engine to open research
  • Use the search bar in Firefox

• Why not update for Linux mechanism works?

  Firefox informed me this morning that an update was available. In the small window in which this information came, there was a button marked "Update Now". I pressed the button and showed a gray horizontal bar with a short dark color bar moving from left to right. The text in the window says that Firefox has been updated. Unfortunately, that "update" can go on forever with nothing to show for it. So finally, I have to close the window myself (using the window manager).

  So my question is: why the update mechanism does not work for Linux?

  You have write rights to the Firefox installation folder?

  You are using a Firefox installation from the repositories of your Linux distribution or you installed Firefox yourself?

  If you used the deposits then you need to update via your software management.
  
  Otherwise, you may need to be updated as long as user root.

  • http://KB.mozillazine.org/Installing_Firefox#Linux

• So, for the 3rd TIME WHEN I REQUEST SUPPLICANT why NOT update only FF updated my browser?

  You see, I ask myself this same question twice before, because Firefox has once more for the third time last updated browser DESPITE MY PLAIDANT ASK TWICE BEFORE NOT to DO SO. but now I have a platform to make public DISHONESY of Firefox, put to task for defying a very adamant demand, specifically NOT UPDATE MY BROWSER, CIRCUMSTANCES THAT systematically, repeatedly occurred throughout all these years I've been with Firefox since 2005.

  How is it that Firefox continues to deliberately defy, ignore the wishes of its customers most loyal me inflamed beyond words, when I repeatedly made KNOWN QUITE WELL NOT to HAVE MY BROWSER updated.

  BUT NOW, AFTER ALL THIS TIME, TOGETHER WITH THE INSIGHT I HAVE RUN AS ONE INDUSTRY COMPUTER SPECIALIST I know very well why Firefox CONTINUES THIS PRACTICE WITH ABANDON.

  1. they do not like anyone was sleeping with the subject: config (then why did you never included it in the first place) as I do.

  2. they don't like anyone made modules incompatible extensions again as I do.

  3. they do not like someone tampering Firefox as I do.

  And all Firefox should do to reduce to nothing all the meticulous work I spend change about: config. configurations to accommodate my own and the needs of my company and all the hard work. spend time of activation of newly incompatible extensions, I need to work as effectively as possibleamong other things that I tweaked, THAT I EXACTLY WHAT YOU DO for THE REASONS I GAVE. YOU deliberately, to DO so hatefully. And that's the final reason for YOUR contempt total without taking account of the request of a customer. In addition, YOU, fIREFOX feel that since you wrote the code, and the owner of the code, YOU can insist USERS to follow the protocols of Firefox exactly as I ask.

  Another example of YOUR dictatorial to browse the web - what approach YOU feel that no one should dare to take a peek to content that is not the level of WHAT YOU BELIEVE IS purity AND ALL OTHER CONTENT CORROMPRE THE MORALS OF OUR YOUTH.

  In one of the cases where my browser has been updated despite my unyielding position against it, someone in YOUR ORGANIZATION has removed several sites for adults STRICTLY STRAIGHT to my favorites.

  SO now, NOT ONLY DO you HAVE AN ATTITUDE INTRUSIVE big BROTHER THAT NOBODY DARE DEVIATE FROM the OFFICIAL FIREFOX BROWSING PROTOCOLS BUT NOW YOU have put in PLACE A CENSURER CAMPAIGN ON WHAT YOU CAN READ, WATCH at all SIMPLY BOOKMARK or.

  BUT IT IS EVEN WORSE, MUCH WORSE. THE LAST TIME TWO YOU UPDATED MY BROWSER AGAINST MY WILL, YOU GAVE ME THE REASON MORE LAME MORE STUPID, INSULTING, STUPID WHY YOU UPDATED TWICE BEFORE AS IF THEY WERE JUST CIRCUMSTANCES THAT OTHERWISE NEVER WOULD HAVE VIOLATED AS WELL AS THE PRIVACY BEING THE TERRIBLE REBEL COMMERCIAL PRACTICES, ARROGANT AND SIMPLY TO YOUR MITIGATING CUSTOMER. BUT NOW IN ADDITION TO PROVE YOURSELF TO BE A MEGALOMANIACAL SOCIOPATH YOU HAVE REVEALED YOURSELF TO BE ABSOLUTE LIARS CHRONICLES.

  AND IT OF BECAUSE I AM RESPONSIBLE FOR MY COMPUTER SERVICE COMPANY AND HAVE A LOT OF COMPUTERS UNDER MY CONTROL AND SUPERVISION. I HAVE ONLY RECENTLY PASSED ON SOME OF OUR COMPUTERS FROM IE TO FIREFOX AS A TEST AND I AM DEPRIVED OF WHAT HAPPENED BETWEEN THE COMPUTERS THAT WERE USING FIREFOX AS A TEST STUDY.

  AND WHILE THE TRUTH BEING WHAT IT IS, YOU ARE CAREFUL NOT TO MESS WITH MY BROWSER, AS IT IS WELL CONFIGURED TO NOT UPDATE, WHICH, IN YOUR HONOR, YOU GAVE HIM A LARGE DOCK, BUT YOU GRIMLY UPDATED SIX COMPUTERS THAT WERE PART OF OUR TEST STUDY
  WHO HAD THE SAME CONFIGURATION OF BROWSER REQUEST NOT TO BE UPDATED BUT THAT YOU UPDATED HOWEVER. THESE COMPUTERS WERE PART OF A STUDY OF PRODUCTIVITY WHICH, BY UPDATING IT SET ALL THE SMALL EXPERIENCE OF OUR BACK A LITTLE BIT.

  SO, WHAT AM I GOING TO DO WITH YOU? I HAVE TO REALLY THINK LONG AND SERIOUSLY ON HOW TO RESPOND TO AN ORGANIZATION THAT HAS SHOWN NOTHING BUT THE WORST KIND OF APATHY, PRACTICES DISHONEST COMMERCIAL I'VE SEEN SINCE BEING IN THE COMPUTER SECTOR.

  Automatic updates can sometimes damage the files in the profile, and I always read several web for a complaint indicating that it has not changed. This is one of the reasons why I don't like the automatic updates.

• Why the update did slow my MacBook pro down so

  Why the update did slow my MacBook pro down so much? What could be in the last update of El Capitan to slow my Mid 2010 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo Macbook Pro 2.66 down so much?   He has never run it slow before! Everything takes more time in all areas. Could I have made a mistake during the download and installation?  If so is it possible to force a re - install the latest update?

  I don't know if I can restore back after an update of this size. Everyone has similar problems or have thoughts on what could be wrong? I know it's far from being a State of the art Macbook Pro. But it was working fine before the update.

  Any thoughts would be really appreciated. I can't afford to buy anything newer right now.

  Thank you

  Ron Genovesi

  HMBGENO

  Things you can try to solve this problem:

  1 https://support.apple.com/kb/PH21875?viewlocale=en_US & local = en_US

  Start in safe mode and then restart.

  2. How to reset the NVRAM on your Mac - Apple Support

  Reset the NVRAM.

  If this does not help, download Etrecheck, a report and view the results here.

  http://etrecheck.com

• When I updated the shock of the clans for my daughter on his iPad, it has its own apple ID. and iCloud, my ID apple came on his id for the update, where it has its own apple ID now. Please can someone tell me why the update came not through its id.

  When I updated the shock of the clans for my daughter on his iPad, it has its own apple ID. and iCloud, my ID apple came on his id for the update, where it has its own apple ID now. Please can someone tell me why the update came not through its ID thanks

  It seems that if the application has been downloaded on his iPad while it is connected to your Apple ID. If so, he'll always want to be updated with your Apple ID.

  You must remove the application from his iPad and then download it again while it is connected to its own code of Apple.

• There was an update to Windows XP sp1 would recognize higher than 127 readers ~ 137 GB, why this update was not in the version later service pack?

  (1) there was an update to Windows XP sp1 would recognize higher than 127 readers ~ 137 GB, why this update was not in the version later service pack?

  (2) where can I find so that I can then reinstall windows XP, updated to sp1, install the patch to see the complete player to sp2 and 3 can be installed?

  original title: supervision XP

  Maybe the disc has been formatted as part of your original installation of Windows XP with a pre - SP1 version of Windows.  At that point, he could only format the drive as 137 GB.  After you upgrade to a post-SP1 version of Windows, look at your hard drive with Disk Manager (start-> Run-> "diskmgmt.msc").  It can show the rest of your unused space that you might then be able to allocate in a second partition.

  If you want to keep one big partition, you will need to get a 3rd third party tool that can extend your current 137 GB partition to use more of the available space.  Google for it, plenty of them out there including those that are free.

  HTH,
  JW

• Why Windows Update repeatedly offers the same update?

  Original title: duplicate updates

  Why Windows Update tells me to download "new" updates, when they were listed as installed successfully 2 days ago?

  Hello

  I suggest you to follow the steps in troubleshooting this article and check if it helps.

  Windows Update or Microsoft Update repeatedly offers the same update

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/910339

  See also: the problems with installing updates

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/troubleshoot-problems-with-installing-updates

• Windows Defender and the malicious software removal tool not doing anything to protect against malware, why Windows Update keep harassing upgrade us on a regular basis?

  original title: WHY Windows Update keep up to date USELESS of Windows Defender and installation USELESS malware remover?

  I'm a computer technician who makes a TON of virus remove money from Windows computers.  Two-thirds of my tasks of repair involving the elimination of viruses from Windows and trying to fix the Internet Explorer, the worst browser known to humanity.

  I have a question about Windows Defender and the malicious software removal tool.  These are two programs entirely worthless, evidenced by the fact that computers with them installed still get infected of all viruses, Trojan and rootkit out there.  Clearly, if these two programs of malware Microsoft has done anything to protect your computer, it would have been without having to release still a THIRD tool antivirus, "security essentials" for Microsoft.   I'm not complaining — the way Microsoft Windows absorbs malware like a sponge, put a lot of money in my bank account. Please keep doing what you're doing... however...

  My question is, given that Windows Defender and the malicious software removal tool doing nothing to protect against malware, why Windows Update keep harassing upgrade us on a regular basis?

  Windows defender is not an antivirus program, it is designed to protect against spyware.

  If you don't like them, so do not use them.

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/890830

• Why this update needs suddenly an index partitioned locally to run fast?

  Dear,
  
  ----------------------------------------------------------------
  Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
  PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
  CORE 10.2.0.4.0 Production
  AMT for Solaris: release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
  NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
  
  I would like to understand the following situation.
  
  I have a partitioned table defined as range
  part_tab (id, dat, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i)
  This table is partitioned on dat range and has a primary key on (b, id, dat) covered by a unique index of the tree b (b, id, dat). The PK column order is not the same as in the definition of the table!
  This table is filled every day by a night of employment (140,000 new records inserted every day) and also updated (800,000 updated records) as follows
  
  for x in (select id, dat, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i
  distant_tab say - simple heap table having a PK (id, dat, b) and accessible through a dblink
  where dis.dat between trunc (sysdate-7) and trunc (sysdate - 1).
  )
  loop
  Update part_tab loc
  set
  Loc.c = dis.c
  loc.d = dis.d,
  loc.e = dis.e,
  loc.f = dis.f,
  loc.g = dis.g,
  loc.h = dis.h,
  loc.i = dis.i,
  where
  Loc.b = dis.b
  and loc.id = dis.id
  and loc.dat = dis.dat
  end loop;
  
  commit;
  
  This update took 40 minutes to finish in PRODUCTION for more than 3 months.
  
  Last week the distant_tab has been purged and went from 12.000.000 records to 1,000,000 records.
  But the update is still almost a fixed number of records to be updated (800,000 records). Statistics on a remote table has also been updated and the updated runtime remains almost the same (40 minutes).
  
  Unfortunately, one day, this update started taking 3 hours to complete. So it has been for 3 days until we have created a unique partitioned index local (dat, id, b) on part_tab which
  did the update runing on less than 10 minutes.
  
  Unique consistency, that I can do with this suddenly high time update is that it starts happening immediately in the distant aftermath of the table
  distant_tab has been shrinked (offline) to set the high-water line. Maybe it has nothing to do with this 3 hours run time but it is worth mentioning.
  
  So my question is:
  
  Why this update, which took 40 minutes for more than 3 months, it must now have an index partitioned locally rather than the index b-tree in 10 minutes, otherwise it will take 3 hours?
  

• Why itunes update causes Firefox to crash?

  My husband tried to update itunes so it could add music to his ipad. He plugged his ipad to our PC and tried to download music. However, he was told he had to update itunes. When he goes to access the update, we lost our internet connection. I guess that Firefox has crashed. He was able to restore the connection, but it took a lot of effort. How could we prevent the accident and how could we have restored more quickly? iTunes seems to wreak havoc with our PC whenever we need to make an adjustment. Why is this?

    Thank you for your help.
  

  I do not, please contact Apple support.

• Why Firefox update when he knows, that it is not compatible with the extensions and plugins?

  Firefox now don't run videos or my birthday e-cards. I tried all solutions as much as I could but am not even remotely a techie to 61.
  Why do you insist on updates that make stuff that I use daily useless? Why do I have to remove or downgrade stuff to get things to work? It is total nonsense.

  I can leave firefox from anything else given this CONSTANT of issues... almost each update something isn't currently compatible... people aren't happy, firefox. I know that I'm not.

  QUESTION: e-cards and videos do not work. period. I have downgrade flash and messed up with realplayer without result.

  HELP and SUGGESTIONS please

  Current advises most recent Flash to solve problems is to downgrade to the latest version of Flash Player to an older,

  • Look at our article Adobe Flash plugin has crashed - don't let him happen again which explains how to uninstall Flash 11.3 and install Flash 11.2
  • a link to Adobe's http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1022066 how to return to a previous version of Flash Player?

  There was more of a problem with Flash Player recently. Staff FlashPlayer and Firefox is aware of and try to correct some of these problems. The latest version of Firefox 13.01 you are on has been partially solve some of these problems.

  I'm agree the rapid update cycle has caused problems, but now is settled and most software must be compatible, or have alternatives that are.

  Browsers; as your operating system and other software. have a problem need to be updated just to secure. If there are specific extensions you are looking for, you will find this blog interesting:
  http://blog.Mozilla.org/addons/2012/05/24/addons-Firefox-3-6/

• Why the update of security KB973768 will not download

  Automatic updates will not download the security update (KB973768). Have an error code of Ox8007F0F4.

  I have updated KB973768 on my pc that will not be installed. All other updates install ok. Anyone has an idea why it will not... [SOURCE; 31 May 2013]

  Please answer each of the following [admittedly tedious] diagnostic questions in a list numbered corresponding type in your very next answer, preferably without quote my post:

  1. What is the full name of your application or the installed antivirus security suite and when (date about) is your subscription current expires? What (other than Defender) anti-spyware applications are installed? What third-party firewall (if applicable)?

  2 a Norton or McAfee application ALREADY installed on the computer?

  3. do you have a free trial Norton or a test of free McAfee [CHOOSE ONE ANSWER] come preinstalled on the computer when you bought it? (No matter if you have never used or activated).

  4. open Add/Remove Programs and make sure that Show updates at the top is checked (and leave it checked); then select the name in the box sort by on the right. Now do scroll down & tell me if ALL the other updates following up-to-date are listed?

  (a) KB2829530, KB2847204, KB2829361, KB2807986 & KB2813170;
  (b) KB2807986; KB2797052, KB2780091 & KB2802968;
  (c) KB2758857 and KB2727528;

  (d) KB2393802 and especially Update for Windows XP (KB971029).

  Most will appear as Windows XP security update , followed by the number in brackets.

  If IE8 is installed, two 2 will appear as a security for Windows Internet Explorer 8 update , followed by the number in brackets.

  5. is Firefox, Chrome or any other alternative browser installed?

  6a. is Java Version 7 update 21 (or higher) installed? TEST HERE in USING INTERNET EXPLORER ONLY! -online http://java.com/en/download/installed.jsp

  6B. is Adobe Flash Player v11.7.700.202 installed? TEST HERE in USING INTERNET EXPLORER ONLY -online http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/

  7. are you familiar with "Registry cleaners" (e.g., Registry Mechanic;) RegCure; RegClean Pro. Advanced SystemCare. Registry Booster; McAfee QuickClean. AVG PC TuneUp. Norton Registry Cleaner; PCTools optimizer; SpeedUpMyPC; PC Doctor; TuneUp Utilities; WinMaximizer; WinSweeper; Comodo System Cleaner. Advanced System Optimizer. CCleaner Registry Cleaner)?

  8 have you ever had the opportunity to do a Repair Installation or a clean installation of Windows XP for some reason any?

• Why Acer Updater can't find the updated drivers listed on the Acer website?

  I've been using one for laptop Acer Aspire 5742 G for more than 1.5 years and although I tried to find any updated drivers for the drivers of my laptop, the Acer Updater installed never find one, although some new drivers Acer India are listed on the site. Also, I ran the detection tool to assist to ensure that components are installed on my laptop and wanted to download and manually install the updated drivers. It is especially for pilots who are 'old' compared to the nVidia Web site, which recently released the version 306.97 mentions the chip nVidia GT 420 M nVidia graphics installed on my laptop.

  Is is safe to update the OEM as nVidia drivers, and whether I should download & install "newer" drivers Acer India site for other components such as LAN, Bluetooth or Wireless LAN, etc.. Would appreciate advice from knowledgeable people. Thank you.

  After long deliberation, I uninstalled all the software components associated with nVidia control panel Windows and installed one that is available on the site Acer India (Ver 285.90). It seems to have a more clear than the 'last' rendering of fonts (Ver 306.97) available drivers on the nVidia India site which is supposed to be compatible for this graphic chip (GeForce GT 420 M). So it seems better to stick to the certified and provided drivers with drivers update OEM, even if qualified supplier of "last". "."

• WHY ICS updates lag?

  Hello Sony,

  I've recently updated the Xperia Arc S, at ICS 4.0.3 Update published by Sony. I was on 0.62 previously, and a factory reset as well until after the update. Transitions lag, led me to do a repair of phone also. The LAGS have become less, but it isn't smooth at all. no where near GB.

  I just wanted to know the reasons for the problems...

  Please tell us if its one of the following options, or something else:

  Case 1:

  The update is not supposed to be laggy at all, that test here at Sony features work smoothly.

  Request: Please download a video of the final ICS update (similar to the videos beta), to show us what we can expect maximum fluidity. Also, if possible, give us a procedure step by step, how to upgrade our telephone, to get the best possible performance out of it.

  Case 2:

  The Rom of the ICS is heavy resource demanding, and it won't go any smotther.

  2.a - case: none of the updates will solve the problem

  2.b - business: the next updates will solve the problem, as the ICS later releases by goolge are beter in terms of resources management

  PS: The CM9 (based on interim certificates), ran very smooth on the Galaxy Ace (tried it myslef). The HTC a V, ICS tracks enough smooth (not as much as GB Xperia, but better than Xperia ICS)

  Thank you.

  Rick

  (Waiting for a response)

  I will pass your request on getting a 'final' video on the new versions of software.

  With regard to your request - I don't know why it is lagging if/when it lag.

  Hope that more recent software can solve this problem. I should mention that it has not been any official communication on the forthcoming software however. I can't confirm the content in the message to Anthony at this stage.

  What do you think on this forum? Let us know by doing this small survey.