Why it is the role of resource is implicitly grant unlimited tablespace?

Similar Questions

• create view does not work with the role of resource

  I just upgraded from 10.2.0.1 to 11.1.0.7
  
  the role of resource users could create views on the old database...
  now, they can't
  ORA-01031 insufficient privileges
  
  I have to give them create it all discovers the system privileges

  (1) I assume you mean that you gave them the CREATE VIEW privilege. Not CREATE ANY VIEW. The latter would allow them to create a view owned by another user who would be dangerous enough.

  (2) it is not related to the role of RESOURCE. It is almost certainly related to the CONNECT role. CREATE VIEW (among other privileges) has revoked the CONNECT role in point 10.2. I don't know why your 10.2 database was working, I guess that you updated from an earlier version, in which case the update may not have removed the privilege correctly (see Metalink: 317258.1).

  (3) you certainly don't want to use the CONNECT role or RESOURCES in the application of the production. Were the roles of the sample which have been overloaded with privileges for the various elements of the sample code. You should really create your own roles with of whatever your users must actually rather than using these predefined roles of privileges.

  Justin

• Privilege 'Create View' has been removed from the role of "Resource" why Oracle?

  Sounds like a silly question, but does anyone know why?

  >
  HM... deprciated and replaced by what? I know that they trimmed CONNECT much but only create view seemed lacking in RESOURCES.
  >
  Replaced by NOTHING. They have not just 'trim' CONNECT. He now has only the CREATE SESSION privilege.

  Published only info I've seen are these two notes in the Oracle is the database of the Security Guide.
  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/B28359_01/network.111/B28531/authorization.htm
  >
  Note:
  Each facility must create its own roles and assign only those privileges which one needs, so to keep detailed privileges in use control. This process eliminates also any need to adapt existing roles, privileges or procedures, whenever the Oracle database changes or removes the roles of Oracle database sets. For example, the role CONNECT now has only a single privilege: CREATE THE SESSION. CONNECT roles and resource will be deprecated in the future the Oracle database releases.
  . . .
  Note:
  Visitors should stop by using the CONNECT and RESOURCE roles, because they will be obsolete in future versions of database Oracle. The role of CONNECTION currently maintains only the CREATE SESSION privilege.

• Doubt on the role of RESOURCE

  Hello
  
  Role of resource provision to give quota unlimited on tablespace default user.
  
  So why it is not displayed when I ask like this
  

  BANNER
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
  PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
  CORE    11.2.0.1.0      Production
  TNS for Linux: Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
  NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
  
  SQL> select PRIVILEGE from role_sys_privs where ROLE='RESOURCE';
  
  PRIVILEGE
  ----------------------------------------
  CREATE SEQUENCE
  CREATE TRIGGER
  CREATE CLUSTER
  CREATE PROCEDURE
  CREATE TYPE
  CREATE OPERATOR
  CREATE TABLE
  CREATE INDEXTYPE

  Second
  
  I created a user granted connect and create table privs only. Now I can create the table, but when I try to insert then I get the error that not with quotas on users to TS. Why can it create the table in the first place. ?
  
  Thank you

  I think it's something hard coded into Oracle for some time.

  Tom Kyte says he is documented in http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=100:11:0:P11_QUESTION_ID:7540675724395 #72949126159962, but I don't the have not found in the online documentation.

• The problem of the connect role and resources

  Hello
  
  As we know, all packing a new user, we can assign connect and resources so that the user can access the system tables.
  
  The problem I got is rather than affect the connect role and resources, I assigned each individually privilege to this role. But, surprisingly, my user has no privileged o accessing space of system tables.
  
  I was working in oracle 9i database. Can someone help me with this and tell me what is the reason behind this?
  
  Thanks in advance.

  Hi role of internal resource composed unlimited tablespace and quota on the tablespace system. but this is not shown in role_sys_privs. We must at the same time the role of resource to think twice or three times. also, as said we shouldn't use system tablespace.

• How the privilege of reading the role for package

  Dear guy,

  I need to grant read only for the procedure and package to user, but not executed. So, I create a role READ_PKG name then the privilege of debugging for the ROLE. Then grant the role to the user who needs to display. But this isn't success. Always user can't see the debug to the ROLE granted package.

  If I grant debugging directly to the user, user can view the package.

  CREATE THE ROLE READ_PKG NOT IDENTIFIED;

  GRANT debugging WE FCUB. ACPKS TO READ_PKG;

  grant READ_PKG to chuongnh;

  THEN, how the privilege of debugging a role?

  So thank you

  Chuong

  Hello

  Are you sure that the role is 'default' to the user?

  SQL > alter user chuongnh the role by default all;

  Kind regards

• Question about the roles... color coding.

  I have my film blocked in compound clips.  I noticed a number of my compound clips is colored blue, instead of the usual gray.  I'm sure it's on the roles I have attributed in the compound... clips but can not quite understand what it is... WHY compound clips themselves are blue light?

  I was wondering if anyone has a useful quick thought?

  Ben

  

  YYou have the role selected in the roles of the index of the timeline panel.

• The computer seems to be configured correctly, the device or resource (DNS server) does not

  When I tried to fix this using other threads, none worked any other suggestions?

  Original title: your computer seems to be configured correctly, but the device or resource (DNS server) is not responding. I tried all of the solutions none works

  Hello

   
  
  This problem is limited to a specific Web site or with everyone?
   

  You can approach this problem in two ways: first by simply disabling the cache, but also by restarting DNS client service, which manages the cached DNS queries.

  
   
  Method 1: Clear DNS Cache

  a. click Startand type cmd in the Start search box.

  b. right click on cmd in the list programs, and then click run as administrator. If you are prompted for an administrator password or a confirmation, type your password or click on continue.

  c. at the command prompt, type the following line and press ENTER:

  ipconfig/flushdns

  Usually, it clears up any issue that may occur.

  
   
  Method 2: Restart the Service DNS Services

  a. Click Start and run, type services.msc, and then click OK.

  b. double-click the DNS Client service. If you receive a Configuration Manager message, click OK.

  c. in the Startup Type list, click on restart and then click OK.

  d. close Services.
  
  e. restart the computer.

  
   
  Method 3: Configure the connection to obtain an IP address automatically

  a. click on 'Start', enter "NCPA. CPL' (without the quotes) in the search bar and press "Enter."

  b. right-click on the network connection, and then click on 'Properties'. If you are prompted for an administrator password or a confirmation, type the password or provide confirmation.

  c. click on select 'Internet Version 6 (TCP/IPv6) Protocol' and then click 'Properties' of .
  
  d. Select "obtain an IP automatically" and "DNS server automatically get an address.

  e. click 'OK'.

  f. highlight "Protocol Version 4 (TCP/IPv4) Internet" and click on "Properties". "" "

  g. Select "obtain an IP automatically" and "DNS server automatically get an address.

  h. click on 'OK'.

  i. restart the computer.

  See also:

  Why I can't connect to the Internet? http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/why-can-t-I-connect-to-the-Internet

• "No access to the network" problem in Windows 7 and error message "your computer seems to be correctly configured but the device or resource (DNS SERVER) is not responding."

  Hello, I have a desktop PC and a laptop (DELL Inspiron N-4050).
  I have problem with my internet connection cable which is working fine on my PC, but does not not on my laptop giving an error "no access to the network.

  When I troubleshoot it says "your computer seems to be correctly configured but the device or resource (DNS SERVER) is not responding."
  I said to many technicians of microsoft online response, but they could not solve my problem and said this is my DNS problem and advised me to contact my Internet service provider. Guess it's because of my internet so why it works on my PC not on laptop?

  Yesterday, my ethernet cable pulled out my cell phone and I couldn't connect to the internet more. But on my desktop PC, it works perfectly fine. (I do not use wifi, if this information is also required) I have studied several threads with similar situations, and I have tried different methods to solve the problem to no avail. I did a system restore, but I'm having no luck. Also, I did not of the latest changes with my anti virus software and my LAN card drivers look to date.

  When I remove my cable from the laptop and again connect my cable then it works but only after the PC sat for awhile.
  1.I did flush DNS by typing "ipconfig/flushdns" in the command prompt.
  2. my IP address, DNS, subnet mask etc are set to automatic.
  3.I also added physical address taken from command line giving "ipconfig/all". for the properties of the network driver settings.
  4.I ' installed the drivers to date of 2014 on my laptop.
  5.I did a lot of searching the web, but they do not solve my problem.

  Please help me to solve it.
  I appreciate your help.
  Thank you.

  Hello Hall,

  Please keep us updated on the status of the issue.

  I suggest you to follow the steps in this Microsoft article troubleshooting and check if it helps:

  Error message "your computer seems to be configured correctly, but the device or resource (DNS server) is not responding" in Windows 7

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/2779064/en-us

  Hope the helps of information.

  Please reply with the results, in order to help you solve the problem.

  Thank you

• Based on the roles of the views of CLI with AAA method

  Hello

  I'm configuration based on the roles of views CLI on a router to limit access to users.

  My criteria:

  -There should be a local user account on the router that has the view of 'service' in the annex

  -If the router is online and can reach the radius server, people in the right group are assigned to the view 'service '.

  My configuration:

  AAA new-model

  Select the secret 1234

  username view service secret service 1234

  !

  AAA my_radius radius server group
  private-server 10.1.1.1 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 timeout 3 retransmit 2 0 1234 key
  private-server 10.1.1.2 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 timeout 2 relay 1 0 1234 key

  !

  authorization AAA console
  AAA authentication login my_radius local group mgmt
  AAA authorization exec mgmt my_radius local group

  !
  Line con 0
  authorization exec mgmt
  Synchronous recording
  login authentication mgmt
  line vty 0 4
  authorization exec mgmt
  Synchronous recording
  login authentication mgmt
  entry ssh transport

  THE ERROR

  Now, I want to go set up the cli view "service"...

  # mode

  Password: 1234

  * 08:00:02.991 Jun 1: AAA/AUTHENTIC/SEE (0000000 D): method of picking list "mgmt".
  * Jun 1 08:00:02.991: RADIUS / ENCODE (0000000D): ask "" password: ".
  * Jun 1 08:00:02.991: RADIUS / ENCODE (0000000D): upload the package. GET_PASSWORD
  * 08:00:21.011 Jun 1: RADIUS: receipt id 1645/13 10.1.1.1:1645, Access-Reject, len 20

  Questions

  Why the view "enable" trying to choose a list of method when you need to provide secrecy to enable it to access the root view?

  You can change this behavior to always use the key to activate it?

  The TEMPORARY Solution

  If you are connected to the router via telnet or SSH, the solution or workaround for this problem is:

  local VIEW_CONFG AAA authentication login

  !

  line vty 0 4

  authentication of the connection VIEW_CONFG

  Make your view configuration and reconfigure the line to use the correct (desired) authentication method.

  ________________________________

  Thanks a lot for the suggestions

  / ENTOMOLOGIST

  Hello

  You have configured the following:

  AAA authentication login my_radius local group mgmt
  AAA authorization exec mgmt my_radius local group

  Line con 0
  authorization exec mgmt
  Synchronous recording
  login authentication mgmt
  line vty 0 4
  authorization exec mgmt
  Synchronous recording
  login authentication mgmt

  entry ssh transport

  So every time you try to connect to the console or ssh authentication will travel to the server radius because of the following command 'connection authentication mgmt '.

  You can get there. What is set on the method list mgmt first will take precedence.

  activate seceret is defined locally. but you have configured the following:

  AAA authorization exec mgmt my_radius local group

  Line con 0
  authorization exec mgmt

  line vty 0 4
  authorization exec mgmt

  So exec mode is also via the radius server.

  When you set up:

  local VIEW_CONFG AAA authentication login

  !

  line vty 0 4

  authentication of the connection VIEW_CONFG

  You do local authentication, so it works the way you want.

  In short, regardless of authentication is set 1 on the list method will take priority. the relief will be checked only if the 1st aaa server is not accessible.

  I hope this helps.

  Kind regards

  Anisha

  P.S.: Please mark this thread as answered if you feel that your query is resolved. Note the useful messages.

• OBIEE presentation services do not come on the recreation of the role Application BISystem

  Hi guys,.

  I accidentally deleted BISystem role of Application of Console. But, went through couple of posts and recreated the Application role, and characterized by the BISystemUser to the role.

  In short, I did the procedure below.

  1. stop BI Service

  2. create a role and a member with the user BISystem

  3. Add the policy to the role

  •Oracle.bi.Scheduler.manageJobs

  •Oracle.bi.Server.queryUserPopulation, it not appear in the list you can add it manually using following parameter

  permission class: oracle.security.jps.ResourcePermission

  Resource type: oracle.bi.server.permission

  Name of the resource: oracle.bi.server.queryUserPopulation

  Action: subject

  • oracle.bi.server.impersonateUser, it does not appear in the list you can add it manually using following parameter

  permission class: oracle.security.jps.ResourcePermission

  Resource type: oracle.bi.server.permission

  Name of the resource: oracle.bi.server.impersonateUser

  • oracle.bi.server.manageRepositories

  • EPM_Essbase_Administrator

  4. start the BI Service

  
  

  But I can't launch the presentation BI Services login page.

  I got the bi_server1 error - diagnostic.log below file and it seems that the user BISystemUser is always having a problem of authentication with the server.

  
  

  Please note that I haven't restarted the server. Just restarted the BI Services.

  
  

  [2016 01-27 T 13: 02:53.544 + 04:00] [bi_server1] [WARNING] [] [oracle.j2ee.ws.common.jaxws.JAXWSMessages] [tid: [ASSETS].] [ExecuteThread: '0' for the queue: "(self-adjusting) weblogic.kernel.Default"] [username: < anonymous >] [ecid: 8b2c6332e32ecb3b:-3907915 c: 1527-c 794733:-8000 - 000000000001717e, 0] [APP: bisecurity #11.1.1] [J2EE_APP.name: bisecurity_11.1.1] [J2EE_MODULE.name: bisecurity] [WEBSERVICE.name: SecurityWebService] [WEBSERVICE_PORT.name: SecurityWebServicePort] Exception during execution of the business logic: SecurityService::checkPermission [OBI-SEC-00060] BISystemUser current user is not authorized to perform the impersonation.

  [2016 01-27 T 13: 03:04.954 + 04:00] [bi_server1] [NOTIFICATION] [] [oracle.bi.security.service] [tid: [ASSETS].] [ExecuteThread: '5' for the queue: "(self-adjusting) weblogic.kernel.Default"] [username: < anonymous >] [ecid: 8b2c6332e32ecb3b:-3907915 c: 1527-c 794733:-8000 - 000000000001718f, 0] [APP: bisecurity #11.1.1] [J2EE_APP.name: bisecurity_11.1.1] [J2EE_MODULE.name: bisecurity] [WEBSERVICE.name: SecurityWebService] [WEBSERVICE_PORT.name: SecurityWebServicePort] SecurityService::checkPermission [OBI-SEC-00060] BISystemUser current user is not authorized to perform impersonation. [[

  oracle.bi.security.service.UnauthorisedAccessException: SecurityService::checkPermission [OBI-SEC-00060] BISystemUser current user is not authorized to perform the impersonation.

  at oracle.bi.security.service.AbstractSecurityServiceAction.checkPermission(AbstractSecurityServiceAction.java:231)

  at oracle.bi.security.service.AbstractSecurityServiceAction.enforceImpersonateUser(AbstractSecurityServiceAction.java:257)

  at oracle.bi.security.service.GetRunAsUserAction.performAuthorisationChecks(GetRunAsUserAction.java:37)

  at oracle.bi.security.service.AbstractSecurityServiceAction.invoke(AbstractSecurityServiceAction.java:154)

  at oracle.bi.security.service.SecurityServiceBean.getRunAsUserWithLanguageAndProperties(SecurityServiceBean.java:484)

  at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor4206.invoke (unknown Source)

  at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)

  Am I missing any step in the process. Also, I checked the steps of two discussions and a few other items.

  Thank you very much

  Prasanna

  Hello

  The problem is resolved after you restart weblogic server.

  Thank you

• Unexpected behavior with the role of OmeSiteAdministrators

  I is currently working on the test of the functionality of the OmeSiteAdministrator role, so we can use it in our Organization.  We run OME 2.0.0.1926.

  I went into preferences - permissions of device group and add a new test user (using members of the edict of OmeSiteAdministrators common task.)  I've provided the correct user and domain name.  Then I went to the section manage permissions of the device group and selected a group that this user must be able to deploy updates and tasks remotely.

  By connecting to the Console as long as this test user I could see all THE devices to Manage - devices.  When I went to Manage - system update I have also able to note all the devices listed in the incompatibilitee section and select any device to bring up the window of the tasks of system update for.

  I looked at the roles of the test user (by clicking the user name in the upper right corner) and saw that he was an OmeSiteAdministrator and OmeUser.  It looks like a clean install of OME adds the BUILTIN\Users group to OmeUsers group.  I deleted the OmeUsers group builtin\Users and then the test user could see that members of a group specified in Manage - system update.

  But when launched test user then the console OME, they could still see all devices to Manage - updating the system, even if the top of the window shows "System Update: filter by: ..  The actually specified group that contains a single device, but the test can view all devices.

  I have logged in as an OmeAdministrator, came back on the device group permissions and see an additional user.
  In modify the members of OmeSiteAdministrators, I see the test user appears twice, both times with the user name and the appropriate domain.  But there under manage group permissions on the device, the user/DOMAIN user that I added, but now also a STRANGER/user (domain is actually 'UNKNOWN' and user is the user name of test).

  It seems that the filter does not always work (it worked only once for the test user.  Each time other than the test user opens the console he showed all devices.)  Also, Im not sure why there is the addition of the UNKNOWN/username user.

  Also, please review read the white paper on delltechcenter.com/ome and see if it offers any help.

  OpenManage Essentials Role-Based Security and implementation

  Thank you

  Rob

• "The memory resources available in the pool of resources of the parent are insufficient for the operations." ... Really?

  Hello

  We have three virtual machines on a host computer. They need to be pinned to this host and with reserved memory: 1 GB, 4 GB, 8 GB.

  We are talking about 13 GB of RAM on a physical server that has 16 GB of physical RAM.

  When I Power On last VM, I get the following error:

  "The memory resources available in the pool of resources of the parent are not enough for the operation."

  I have a second host with the same size of memory and use reach 14GB of memory.

  I know that each virtual machine wants more memory than what we have configured, but I would like to know if it's a "bug" or

  something we can fix via vCenter configuration, or we really need more physical memory.

  Please find attached the config of memory for the virtual machine and the host State.

  Thanks in advance for your help.

  Host needs some memory as well for things like vmkernel, drivers and other components and you will not be able to touch this area with reserves of VM. It is not a bug, more like a fuse. You will not be allowed to book all of the physical RAM to VMs and / or resource pools.

  In your case, you should either decrease the reserves (why are you booking 100% memory for your virtual machines? What you're trying to achieve with this setting? Is it an obligation of the seller to App?) or increase the amount of physical RAM on the host.

  Of course this depends on your specific requirements and management policies of the resources, but in most cases I've seen, reservations are only affected when there is a heavy statement memory and using actions alone is not enough. Even so, reservations are usually configured only for very high priority / criticality VMs and not 100%, but rather a little before "stable / persistent peak memory Active" value. F.x. If a particular virtual machine has more mem use regularly on Wednesday 1-3 PM and memory active value for this period is 3 GB, a reservation is usually set to something like 4GB.

  I hope this helps.

• Grant read only to a user only with the role

  Legends of dear,

  Req: create user selection/read-only join specific 3-5 tables in a specific schema and no selection/read only access to the sys/system schema.

  After surfing and tried to grant the "read-only" access for a user as follows.

  create user readonly identified by readonly123;

  create read_only_role role identified by read_only_access;

  Grant connect, read-only resources.

  Grant select on applications. FND_PRODUCT_GROUPS read-only;

  Grant select on applications. FND_USER read-only;

  grant read_only_role read-only;

  The above statements

  1. created user, role

  2. granted to connect/create user session and I am able to run the following query

  logged in as readonly

  Select * from APPS. FND_PRODUCT_GROUPS;

  Where I am able to select even sys or system tables.

  But I'm not able to make the same read only access provided to a role and assign the role to the user subsequently,.

  create user readonly identified by readonly123;

  create the role of read_only_role identified by read_only_access;

  Grant connect to read_only_role;

  Grant select on applications. FND_PRODUCT_GROUPS to read_only_role;

  Grant select on applications. FND_USER to read_only_role;

  grant read_only_role read-only;

  Let me know your suggestions,

  Ref:roles and privileges of user management

  Roles of the Oracle

  GRANT statement

  https://forums.Oracle.com/thread/2223362

  Thank you

  Knockaert

  Hi, Karthik,

  If a role has a password (as in this case), then the user must activate this role during its current session in order to to use, like this:

  ROLE of the read_only_role IDENTIFIED BY read_only_access VALUE.

  If the role does not have a password, then it is enabled by default as soon as the user opens a session.

  Remember, the roles do not count inside procedures AUTHID DEFINE stored (which is the default type).  If you need to use the table inside an AUTHID DEFINER stored procedure, then the privileges must be granted directly to the user and not just a role.

  I hope that answers your question.

  If this isn't the case, after a complete test script that people can run to recreate the problem and test their ideas.  You started great: CREATE instructions you posted were perfect, but you need to add the CONNECTIONS and SELECT statements (and the SETTINGS, if necessary) to show how the error occurs.

• OIM 11g - reconciliation of the status of resource target

  Hello
  
  
  We work closely with IOM 11.1.1.5.2 and DBUM 9.1.0.4 and MSAD 9.1.1.7.
  Commissioning and reconciliation seem to work fine, but we found that the State of the resource is not be compared on the console of the IOM.
  
  For example, if supply us a user with an account of Oracle database, then lock the account on the database, when we run the reconciliation, the event is generated and finished with 'update succeeded', we go to the UD_DB_ORA_U table and find that the UD_DB_ORA_U_LOCK field has a value "BLOCKED." , then if we check the newspapers, we can see that the connector is properly mapping the State of resources with purpose of IOM status:
  
  prepareTargetUsersRecordInOIMFormat: save the value: LOCKED
  prepareTargetUsersRecordInOIMFormat: map: {OPEN = enabled 1 = Disabled, YES = Disabled, 0 = active, EXPIRED & LOCKED = Disabled No. = Enabled, LOCKED = disabled}
  ...
  prepareTargetUsersRecordInOIMFormat: roValue: TEMPORARY_TABLESPACE_QUOTA
  prepareTargetUsersRecordInOIMFormat: Temp RO value: null
  prepareTargetUsersRecordInOIMFormat: reconData: [{default Tablespace = 27 ~ USERS, Authentication Type = PASSWORD, password = dummy, default Tablespace = 27 ~ USERS, Authentication Type = PASSWORD, password = dummy, Quota of Tablespace default = profile_name = 27 ~ USERS, resource = Oracle, user name is USPRUEBA65, temporary Tablespace = 27 ~ TEMP, account status is LOCKED, status = Disabled, Global DN =, privilege list is [], the list of roles = [{role Admin Option = number}] [{[{, role name =}], Quota of temporary Tablespace =}]
  prepareTargetUsersRecordInOIMFormat: COMPLETED
  
  But, even if reconciliation succeeded the administration shows console account status "Enabled" and when I check the table Ouedraogo, I see that the status of an object of the IOM is always enabled.
  
  
  I found a few discussions on this issue, the closest was this one: reconciliation for users deleted on the target resource accounts but all it doesn't seem to be a great help because all the tasks described are already carried out by the installation of the connector (at least in the msad and dbum connectors).
  
  This problem occurs both Active Directory and Oracle database users, maybe we missed something but based on the documentation for both connectors, we thought it was a STANDARD feature. Is there some setting of the connector or the property of the system, that we have to configure to make it work?
  
  Thank you.
  
  Published by: fmc on July 26, 2012 12:53

  It should work OOTB. No need to write an adapter for it.
  It works for me like OOTB waited.

  Don't see you not received update reconciliation task inserted into the details of the profile of the users of resources? You have changed the status of the object mapping task in this task? It must be set to NONE.

  Thank you
  Patricia