Windows ISE 1.1.2

Similar Questions

• Error 0 x 80070643 installation on Windows Server 2008 R2 when installing PowerShell ISE?

  I am running a new installation of WinSvr 2k8r2 order on my server at home. and when I try to install Powershell ISE, I get error 0 x 80070643 installation.  I read the entries posted here but all are specific to MSSE and related to Win7, Vista, or Windows XP. What should I do to fix this error.
  Thank you

  Hi Dan,.

  Your question is more complex than what is generally answered in the Microsoft Answers forums. It is better suited for the IT Pro TechNet public. Please ask your question in the following forum.

  Windows PowerShell Forum

• Windows PowerShell ISE is required on Windows Vista Home Edition?

  Windows PowerShell ISE is required on Windows Vista Home Edition?

  Original title: Windows PowerShell ISE

  Hi MEL41,

  Welcome to the community of Microsoft and thanks for posting the question. I've surely you will help find a solution on the issue. If I understand correctly, you need to learn more about Windows Powershell ISE, is it necessary for Windows Vista Home edition.

  1. do you have problems regarding Windows Powershell ISE?

  2. do you receive any error messages?

  Windows PowerShell 1.0 is a new shell for command line based on tasks and a scripting language that is designed specifically for system administration. Based on Microsoft .NET Framework, Windows PowerShell IT helps professionals and expert users control and automate the administration of Windows operating system and the applications that run on Windows.
   
   
  Using Windows PowerShell, administrators can manage their systems by typing individual commands or running scripts that automate management tasks. Microsoft Exchange Server 2007, Microsoft System Center Operations Manager 2007, System Center Data Protection Manager V2, and System Center Virtual Machine Manager use Windows PowerShell to improve efficiency and productivity.

  Windows Powershell is intended for administrative purposes, if you use it, you can uninstall the update. I suggest you to read this article for more information.

  Reference:

   

  
  Windows PowerShell 1.0 for Windows Vista installation package
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/928439

   

   

  Hope this information helps. Please reply back with the State so that we can help you.

• In anticipation of the posture with 1.3, Agent NAC 4.9.5.10 ISE and Windows 10

  Hello

  I have a client with the patch 1.3 ISE 5 installed in its network, and it tests the connection to the network from a client Windows 10. In the client, this customer has manually installed Agent NAC 4.9.5.10, and used Anyconnect 4.2.01035 (with NAM module) as supplicant 802.1 x.

  In the ISE, the 3.6.10205 - 2 4.9.5.10 NAC Agent and compliance Module is downloaded and there is that a strategy of commissioning of the customer created in order to provide customers with this version of the NAC Agent and compliance Module if this client authenticates correctly in Active Directory. There is also a political Posture that requires that the customer have a fixed version of McAffee Antivirus from the Posture.

  When connecting to the wifi network, the client authenticates properly using the user name and, after authentication, it launches the Cisco's NAC Agent in order to pass the posture. At this point, the Agent NAC pop-up displays an error indicating that the operating system of the client is not supported, although NACAgent 4.9.5.10 supports Windows 10 and patch5 ISE 1.3 also supports Windows 10. Due status Posture maintains in State waiting, the customer is not allowed to connect with the correct permissions for the network by the ISE authorization policy.

  My questions are:

  You know the reason for this error showed by NAC Agent (client operating system not supported)?

  Do you know what are the correct versions of the NAC and ISE Agent to support customers on Windows 10 connections?

  And also, Windows 10 is supported by ISE 1.3 patch5 or maybe it's better to move to ISE 2.0?

  Thanks in advance

  Concerning

  Juan

  I'll guess that maybe the VA of Cisco and databases supported OS version are not current.  Try to go to the Administration->-> Posture--> updates the settings and click on "Update Now".

• ISE and windows 7 both are ESXI VMs

  Hello

  I'm not great in the virtual world, I need a help in my Installer please.

  I ise 1.3 and windows 7, both are VMS on esxi I need to test some features such as the CWA, assessment of provisioning and the posture of the Client on windows 7.

  I don't know how to place a (physical or nexus 1000v) cisco switch and connect the windows vm on this subject, so I can start my tests.

  I know a lot of people have done this, but I couldn't find a clear instructions on how to complete the configuration.

  Thanks in advance.

  KO

   Hi , i'm not great in the virtual world , i need a help in my setup please . i have ise 1.3 and windows 7 , both are VM on esxi i need to test some features like CWA, Client provisioning and posture assessment on the windows 7 . I don't know how to place a cisco switch (physical or nexus 1000v) and connect the windows vm on it so i can start my tests. I know a lot of people have been doing that but i could not find a a clear instruction on how to complete the configuration . Thanks in advance. KO 

  Hi KB,

  Try to set up the two devices in same vlan first and test your strategies.

  Just add vlan switch with number 10 or whatever it is and connected ports or the virtual card on vlan 10 for connectivity.

  It could be that useful...

  -GI

  Rate if this can help

• ISE and windows phone

  Ciao,.

  Is there support for windows phone 7.x (8.x when he goes out) in ISE?

  I want to talk about delivery process:

  -Installation wizard network

  -CEP (I think that this is supported by a windows)

  or if W.P. will be inserted in a Design Guide for Cisco?

  I need to managed W.P. as BYOD.

  Kind regards

  Iarno

  I checked that the ISE settings and client provisioning policies haven't labeled phone windows operating system. I also checked the QA and release notes and did not find anything there either. Operating systems that you can check is the android, ios, windows 7 xp... etc. and mac osx.

  It would be better for you to open a TAC case to get a definitive answer, my feeling is it is not supported. If you follow this route please post what you find for future reference.

  Hope that helps.

  Tarik Admani
  * Please note the useful messages *.

• Authentication (Windows Server 2013) AD Cisco ISE problem

  Background:

  Has deployed two Cisco ISE 1.1.3. ISE will be used to authenticate users wireless access admin WLC and switches. Database backend is Microsoft running on Windows Server 2012 AD. Existing Cisco ACS 4.2 still running and authenticate users. There are two Cisco WLCs version 7.2.111.3.

  Wireless users authenticates to AD, through works of GBA 4.2. Access admin WLC and switches to the announcement through ISE works. Authentication with PEAP-MSCHAPv2 access and admin PAP/ASCII wireless.

  Problem:

  Wireless users cannot authenticate to the announcement through ISE. This is the error message '11051 RADIUS packet contains invalid state attribute' & '24444 Active Directory failed because of an error that is not specified in the ISE'.

  

  Conducted a detailed test of the AD of the ISE. The test was a success and the result seems fine except for the below:

  xxdc01.XX.com (10.21.3.1)

  Ping: 0 Mins Ago

  Status: down

  xxdc02.XX.com (10.21.3.2)

  Ping: 0 Mins Ago

  Status: down

  xxdc01.XX.com

  Last success: Thu Jan 1 10:00 1970

  March 11 failure: read 11:18:04 2013

  Success: 0

  Chess: 11006

  xxdc02.XX.com

  Last success: Fri Mar 11 09:43:31 2013

  March 11 failure: read 11:18:04 2013

  Success: 25

  Chess: 11006

  Domain controller: xxdc02.xx.com:389

  Domain controller type: unknown functional level DC: 5

  Domain name: xx.COM

  IsGlobalCatalogReady: TRUE

  DomainFunctionality: 2 = (DS_BEHAVIOR_WIN2003)

  ForestFunctionality: 2 = (DS_BEHAVIOR_WIN2003)

  Action taken:

  Log Cisco ISE and WLC by using the credentials of the AD. This excludes the connection AD, clock and AAA shared secret as the problem.

  (2) wireless authentication tested using EAP-FAST, but same problem occurs.

  (3) detailed error message shows below. This excludes any authentication and authorization policies. Even before hitting the authentication policy, the AD search fails.

  12304 extract EAP-response containing PEAP stimulus / response

  11808 extracted EAP-response containing EAP - MSCHAP VERSION challenge response to the internal method and accepting of EAP - MSCHAP VERSION such as negotiated

  Evaluate the politics of identity

  15006 set default mapping rule

  15013 selected identity Store - AD1

  24430 Authenticating user in Active Directory

  24444 active Directory operation failed because of an error that is not specified in the ISE

  (4) enabled the registration of debugging AD and had a look at the logging. Nothing significant, and no clue about the problem.

  (5) wireless tested on different mobile phones with the same error and laptos

  (6) delete and add new customer/features of AAA Cisco ISE and WLC

  (7) ISE services restarted

  (8) join domain on Cisco ISE

  (9) notes of verified version of ISE 1.1.3 and WLC 7.2.111.3 for any open caveats. Find anything related to this problem.

  10) there are two ISE and two deployed WLC. Tested a different combination of ISE1 to WLC1, ISE1 to WLC2, etc. This excludes a hardware problem of WLC.

  Other possibilities/action:

  1) test it on another version WLC. Will have to wait for approval of the failure to upgrade the WLC software.

  (2) incompatibility between Cisco ISE and AD running on Microsoft Windows Server 2012

  Did he experienced something similar to have ideas on why what is happening?

  Thank you.

  Update:

  (1) built an another Cisco ISE 1.1.3 sever in another data center that uses the same domain but other domain controller. Thai domain controller running Windows Server 2008. This work and successful authentication.

  (2) my colleague tested in a lab environment Cisco ISE 1.1.2 with Windows Server 2012. He has had the same problem as described.

  This leads me to think that there is a compatibility issue of Cisco ISE with Windows Server 2012.

  
  

  
  

  Yes, it seems that 1.1.3 doesn't support Server 2012 as of yet.

  External identity Source OS/Version

  Microsoft Windows Active Directory 2003 R2 32-bit and 64-bit

  Active Directory Microsoft Windows 2008 32-bit and 64-bit

  Microsoft Windows Active Directory 2008 R2 64-bit only

  Microsoft Windows Active Directory 2003 32-bit only

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ISE/1.1/compatibility/ise_sdt.PDF

• ISE, Windows 7 Machine AuthZ

  I'm running on an issue that me was dead in the water on the realization of a roll of ISE for Wireless.  The company has two SSID, an intern and an open, which is essentially an internet conduct only.  No internal resources (other than DHCP and DNS) are available.  We left a SSID inherited using ISE several months ago. Very simple, no BYOD, no registration unit, just Sponsor portal for external notebook computers and the staff for smartphones AD user authentication.  The great work.

  The second task was to take a legacy internal SSID and convert it to ISE 1.2.  My thoughts on how to do so, based on the previous experience, the SISE tutorial, "Cisco ISE BYOD and Secure Unified Access" text (which I recommend), and that a couple of consultants, has been to use 802. 1 X to apply computer authentication and user.  Seems simple enough.

  Of course, I need this implementation so that it is completely transparent to users.  The legacy SSID is controlled through ad group policy, it seemed a simple matter to change GP, as the new SSID comes at a higher priority.  Users will see both, AD will offer a new, and life goes on.

  That's exactly how it is supposed to work, and as far as I can tell, for all cold from laptops, which is exactly what is happening.

  See coldstart.png.

  Until a user decides to shut down his laptop and standby/hibernation sets.

  In case of a night, in the morning, the laptop goes to perform a user authZ but no machine AuthZ.  Because there is no authZ machine, the machine is unable to gain access to the Interior, which is a problem.  In the paper, I see this step:

  ISE 24423 was not able to confirm the previous machine successfully authentication of user in Active Directory

  In talking with the TAC, they grow I use NAM as begging him, rather than the Native Windows 7 supplicant.  Although I have installed AnyConnect on any computer, cell phone, at the moment, I have configured NAM and that breaks my directive "completely transparent to users.

  I also work with Microsoft, and while they have yet to confirm that Windows 7 is just too stupid to understand the situation of the notebook is, I suspect say that soon, as we are running out of things to try on the client.

  I am aware of the timer of the re-authentication that exists under the appropriate Authe\orization profile, and this number seems to max out at 18 hours (16-bit).

  At present, the I set the timer Reauth in results from politics to 1800 seconds.  I could probably put in a longer time, but weekends that will mess up like a good solution.

  About authentication, my default network to ISE strategy, I encouraged PEAP and EAP-FAST.  PEAP is preferred.  PACs are used.  See Defaultaccess.png, Defaultaccess2.png

  So, I can't believe I'm the only person with this problem.  Tell your users not to suspend their machines is not an option.  So, I have to ask...  Anyone else able to use 802. 1 X, ISE, Windows 7, as it works with sleep/hibernate?

  You're not alone. Making the real machine and the authentication of users (EAP-GETE) is currently not supported by any suppliant natives there. If you notice, the parameters begging Windows 7 allow to define "user or user or machine machine", but not "Machine and User ' is the reason was Cisco's push you the customer NAM. You can view the deployment guide from Cisco for EAP-GETE (a.k.a. EAP-Chaining here):

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/solutions/collateral/enterprise/design-zone-security/howto_80_eapchaining_deployment.PDF

  In addition, a draft RFC for TEAP was already posted:

  http://Tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-EMU-EAP-tunnel-method-01

  Simply tell your representatives MS and Apple to this topic and request that it be supported in future releases and patches. :)

  I don't know enough about your environment, but I suspect that you use MAR (Machine access restrictions). If you use MAR, there is a timer that is set on the tab integration "AD". Once this timer expires ISE removes the database machine mac address, thus preventing the machine to the network until it performs another authentication machine. Unfortunately, this type of machine authentication only happens during a reboot or during a newspaper off / log. There are other associated limits of MAR (see link below) and personally I don't like nor recommend:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/LAN-switching/8021x/116516-problemsolution-technology-00.html

  With all that being said, I see the following options:

  1 back up the timer MAR to 168 hours (1 week) and have users that they must restart their machines first thing Monday.

  2. set Windows supplicants to perform only the PEAP machine authentication. It is different from that of MAR the actual machine AD credentials are used. You will not be able to perform the authentication of the user, but at least you'll only be allowing assets Corp. on the network.

  3. implement the Cisco NAM client and perform an EAP-GETE

  I hope this helps!

  Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

• ISE of Cisco protocols for ldap and Windows wireless client

  Only protocols below are supported by ise in combination with ldap identity sources.

  EAP - GTC, PAP, EAP - TLS, PEAP-TLS.

  Peripheral Mac OS appear to be able to use these, but Windows users seem to have problems. How windows users must connect with ise that only uses the ldap Protocol?

  You can use the anyconnect Network Access Manager. Just out of curiosity why ldap on join ise to AD?

  Sent by Cisco Support technique Android app

• ISE 1.1.4 and AD 2012 Windows

  Hello.

  I'm trying raise 802. 1 x authentication certificate and running. I want to use the user and computer certificate.

  On v1.1.4 "Vanilla", I get an error message with the user certificate. After some reading, it appears support for 2012 AD was added in patch 2.

  So I installed the patch 4, and user certificate authentication works!

  But I still have problems with machine certificate authentication.

  I get these errors:

  Machine on Active Directory authentication failed.

  Check if the machine account is active and present in Active Directory. Also check whether Active Directory is available.

  But the machine is present and active in AD.

  And AD works too. I know through the user certificate authentication, because the binary comparison is enabled:

  Looking 24432 user in Active Directory - [email protected] / * /

  24469 the user certificate was extracted from Active Directory successfully

  22054 binary comparison of the certificates was successful

  Authentication 22037 spent

  12506 EAP - TLS authentication successful

  If Windows Server 2012 AD is supported for the authentication of the computer? Or should I go go v1.2 for whom?

  Or it could just be something wrong with my setup

  Thank you.

  Hello

  Support for 2012's official in 1.2, the release notes for lists this as a new feature.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ISE/1.2/Release_notes/ise12_rn.html#wp376082

  Tarik Admani
  * Please note the useful messages *.

• Cisco ISE 1.1.1 with Windows posturing

  Hello

  We tired for configured windows posturing here's the scenario

  We saw five ise boxes 3315 with version 1.1.1 off them 2 is admin, 2 is PS and 1 MNT

  and we have local Symantec and WSUS Server.

  We make posturing for Windows where I have a few questions

  (1) is there an integration here of the local WSUS server with Cisco ISE where Cisco ISE can automatically take all the mandatory WSUS update according to the crititcality of the WSUS server.

  (2) what is advised to set up the strategy of the Posture of the posture of windows in Cisco ISE and if manually configure windows political posture using specific KB and if there is an update available on Microsoft will we be able to configure the policy for the new update.

  (3) we have configured authentication dot1x in cisco ise and asked as well as on switch port where once the user must be connected to dot1x port of the switch it invites username and password dot1x and therefore, authorization policy, it gives vlan appropriate dynamics.

  But what are the ways where we can restrict the machine which is rather than the assets of the company and even if the user's user name and password in short any employee aware how we can restrict the user making the machine rather than the assets of the company?

  (4) can configure US policy posture for antivirus which will keep us in normal mode and at the same time, we can put posturing for windows which monioring mode which only monitor policy posture and reflected in the monitoring, log in which does not restrict the network for windows posturing

  That will be great if any one can please help me to get the issues

  Thank you

  Pranav

  What follows is under the POLICY-OF ELEMENTS of STRATEGY-POSTURE-> REQUIREMENTS > >

  

  What follows is located under

  POLICY OF-> ELEMENTS OF STRATEGY-> POSTURE->

  REPAIR-> WINDOWS SERVER UPDATE SERVICES REMEDIATION ACTIONS

  

  What follows is part POLICY-> POSTURE

  

  These settings work ALMOST flawlessly for me by forcing her we approved on our WSUS server for our group of workstations updated (all of our laptops are members of the) which meet the criteria of severity EXPRESS (critical and Important). Now, what I've discovered in the last few days is that... MS seems a bit random in their identification of what severity level they assign to their updates. For example... I think that a service pack of the operating system would be considered IMPORTANT if not CRITICAL... however... Look at this from the identification of the server WSUS from Windows 7 Service Pack 1:

  

  Thus, those who updates you deleted, I'd go throgh your WSUS server to identify how they are identified by gravity, then according to your needs set the parameters of the ISE accordingly to ensure that you get updates you plan.

  Hope this helps everyone out there who has similar problems.

  Thank you

  Dirk

• ISE Posture Windows enter password to view the desktop very slow

  Hello, had a problem of slowness that I don't know how to solve problems.  ISE 2.0 patch3, AnyConnect 4.3.02

  My setup is Anyconnect which is already on the computer windows laptop 10, EAP with TLS chaining for authentication of the host and PEAP for user auth.  ISE Posture checks for windows AV defs and AV windows install.  AnyConnect has 'start before logon' installed and * just work *.  Boots of the user, auths from the machine before the connection of the user, user logs in and ISE Posture check runs and passes.  The user gets the green checkmark on the line.

  With a little problem.  At the time wherever the user types the password and hit enter, the grip of the Welcome screen for about 45 to 60 seconds, a few rare occasions longer, my high water line is 1 minute 12 seconds.  Meanwhile machine auth and auth user spend with the unknown state of compliance in the live of the radius of ISE log.  Then welcome screen disappears and the bureau paints (finally), at this time, the machine cannot access anything on the network, 5 seconds later the Anyconnect client starts.  1 second later the bumps network connection, and the analysis of the Posture of ISE in the Anyconnect client starts.  Analysis of the Posture of the ISE takes about 7-10 seconds to complete.  After that everything is good and the user can access the network.

  If control of Posture of ISE is deleted, the whole process takes 10-15 seconds password entry the user to be able to use the laptop and access the internet.

  Does anyone have an idea whence this 'start delay '?  Feels like a timeout of some sort.  It happened on this latest version of the Anyconnect and 3 previous ones as well.  I concentrate on my test machine windows 10 laptop, but the same thing happened on 4 other test systems which are a mixture of windows 7, 8.1 and 10.  The 10 win test system is a lenovo x 1 carbon with an SSD and is normally fairly quick.

  All the tips are greatly appreciated.

  e-

  Do you have the port in a vlan to auth machine and then change once the machine and the user connects? Also, you will probably need to open any acl you apply while the posture is 'unknown '. It is usually due to some AD access that is blocked.

• Windows 10 wireless emits ISE 2.0

  Everyone has noted problems with the 10 network connection Windows PC wireless using ISE?

  In the logs of the radius, the machine is get authenticated but the PC invites for the name of user and password.

  The config works for Windows 7.  The SSID is clicked it asks username and pass and they have access.

  This doesn't seem to work with users on Windows10

  Do you have the patches installed with 2.0? The following fix was made in 1 2.0 patch

  CSCuw88770: ISE 2.0 Wireless PEAP TLS 1.2 auth fail with 6 Android and Win 10

• Using Windows Powershell ISE with vSphere PowerCLI

  Hey everybody,

  I'm completely newbieand have just started on the track "managing vSphere with powershell. First problem:

  Is it possible to use Windows Powershell ISE with vSphere cmdlets or can I only use the vSphere PowerCLI?

  I wish I could type my commands directly in the window of the ISE and manage my scripts etc because of this (I find myself n always cut and paste from Notepad when you use the PowerCLI).

  If so, how should I do this?

  I guess its something simple, but when I run the ISE seems not to have registered vSphere cmdlets. I guess I missed something?

  Thank you

  Marc

  In the ISE if you run the following cmdlet, you will get the registered PowerCLI cmdlets:

  Add-PSSnapin "Vmware.VimAutomation.Core".

• ISE 1.1.1 posture of client Windows NAC loop control

  Hi all

  Just upgraded Cisco ISE to 1.1.1 in my demo/lab environment and now have problems with an implementation of the basic posture. In short, I connect a wireless SSID and verify the posture based on the presence of a file. The NAC agent says my host compliant comprehensive network and grants access however about 5 seconds later it it checks for the requirements again everything by putting my host in the temporary network access. At this point, he says I'm in line again and 5 seconds later scans again. This behaivour doesn't stop and continues constantly until I close the wireless connection. I had no problem with this Setup on 1.1.

  The newspaper indicate successful compliance and not compliance errors. Any ideas would be appreciated.

  Stephen, take a look at this, it really looks like is a bug and it s we can do anything... .workaround, has chosen another method of authentic, pathetic...

  lets wait for a patch

  CSCua79768            Details of bug

  Chaining of EAP + Posture lost consistent Session: PostureStatus in reauth

  Symptom: NAC agent seems continually posture endpoint in a continuous loop Conditions: Machine authentication EAP - TLS, EAP-chaining of Posture OR + Posture Workaround solution: Use the different authentication method.