With RW on PIX 525 SNMP community

Similar Questions

• Problems with VPN PIX 525 Lan-to-Lan Cisco 2610XM

  Hello world

  I have a VPN with PIX 525 versi problems? n 7.2 (1) and Cisco 2610XM Version 12.3 (18). When start the PIX, all tunnels works well, but 6-7 days, some of the tunnels do not work properly. Traffic passes the tunnel with some networks, but not with all networks. Sometimes the tunnel descends and it is imposible to go upward.

  Attach them files are the "debug crypto isakmp" in both devices.

  Thank you and sorry for my bad English

  If your configuration of the tunnel on router 7500 series, the tunnel interface are not supported for politicians to service in the tunnel interfaces on 7500

• PIX 525 with OSPF

  Anyone used PIX 525 with routing OSPF? How it works, which means is it reliable? All the problems?

  SP

  Thank you

  This feature is now reliable enough. We had met bug initially, but they have been constantly improved.

  Thank you

  Nadeem

• Allowing ICMP and Telnet via a PIX 525

  We are trying to build a new block of distribution to our backbone WAN. We are experiencing a problem when establishing ICMP and Telnet via the PIX. The following is known:

  1 Ping and telnet to the 6509 and internal network works very well for the PIX.

  2 Ping the 7206 for the PIX works just fine.

  3 debug normal to see activity track ICMP for connections ICMP for the PIX of the network 6509 and internal; However, the debug shows nothing - no activity - during attempts to ping at a.b.5.18. (see below).

  In short, all connections seem to be fine between the three devices, however, we can get ICMP and Telnet work correctly through the PIX.

  The layout is:

  6509 (MSFC) - PIX 525-7206

  IP:a.b.5.1 - a.b.5.2 a.b.5.17 - a.b.5.18

  255.255.255.0 255.255.255.240 255.255.255.240

  (both)

  networks: a.b.5.0 a.b.5.16

  255.255.255.240 255.255.255.240

  6509:

  interface VlanX

  Description newwan-bb

  IP address a.b.5.1 255.255.255.0

  no ip redirection

  router ospf

  Log-adjacency-changes

  redistribute static subnets metric 50 metric-type 1

  passive-interface default

  no passive-interface Vlan9

  ((other networks omitted))

  network a.b.5.0 0.0.0.255 area 0

  default information are created

  PIX 525:

  ethernet0 nameif outside security0

  nameif ethernet1 inside the security100

  nameif ethernet2 security10 failover

  hostname XXXXXX

  domain XXX.com

  fixup protocol ftp 21

  fixup protocol http 80

  fixup protocol h323 1720

  fixup protocol rsh 514

  fixup protocol rtsp 554

  fixup protocol smtp 25

  fixup protocol sqlnet 1521

  fixup protocol sip 5060

  fixup protocol 2000 skinny

  names of

  access ip-list 102 permit a whole

  access-list 102 permit icmp any one

  access-list 102 permit icmp any any echo

  access-list 102 permit icmp any any echo response

  access-list 102 permit icmp any any source-quench

  access-list 102 permit everything all unreachable icmp

  access-list 102 permit icmp any one time exceed

  103 ip access list allow a whole

  access-list 103 allow icmp a whole

  access-list 103 permit icmp any any echo

  access-list 103 permit icmp any any echo response

  access-list 103 permit icmp any any source-quench

  access-list 103 allow all unreachable icmp

  access-list 103 allow icmp all once exceed

  pager lines 24

  opening of session

  timestamp of the record

  logging buffered stored notifications

  interface ethernet0 100full

  interface ethernet1 100full

  interface ethernet2 100full

  Outside 1500 MTU

  Within 1500 MTU

  failover of MTU 1500

  IP address outside a.b.5.17 255.255.255.240

  IP address inside a.b.5.2 255.255.255.240

  failover from IP 192.168.230.1 255.255.255.252

  alarm action IP verification of information

  alarm action attack IP audit

  history of PDM activate

  ARP timeout 14400

  Global 1 interface (outside)

  NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0

  Access-group 103 in external interface

  Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 a.b.5.18 1

  Route inside a.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 a.b.5.1 1

  Inside a.b.0.0 255.240.0.0 route a.b.5.1 1

  Timeout xlate 03:00

  Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0: 10:00 udp 0:02:00 CPP 0: h323 from 10:00 0:05:00 sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00

  Timeout, uauth 0:05:00 absolute

  GANYMEDE + Protocol Ganymede + AAA-server

  RADIUS Protocol RADIUS AAA server

  No snmp server location

  No snmp Server contact

  SNMP-Server Community public

  No trap to activate snmp Server

  enable floodguard

  No sysopt route dnat

  Telnet a.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 outdoors

  Telnet a.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 inside

  Telnet a.b.0.0 255.240.0.0 inside

  Telnet a.b.5.18 255.255.255.255 inside

  Telnet timeout 5

  SSH timeout 5

  Terminal width 80

  Recognizing any help on proper routing through a PIX 525, given that all this is for a network internal.

  on the 6509, why the int has a 24 subnet mask, when everything has a 28? If you try the 6500 ping.18, he thinks that it is on a local network, and there no need to route through the pix

  Your access lists are confusing.

  access-list # ip allowed any one should let through, and so everything that follows are redundant statements.

  for the test,.

  alloweverything ip access list allow a whole

  Access-group alloweverything in interface outside

  should the pix act as a router - you are effectively disabling all firewall features.

• local database of pix 525

  Hello friends...

  I configured pix 525 for easy vpn. About 100 to 200 people will use this service. I don't have much knowledge about the radius and tacacas servers. Is enough local database for extended authentication or do I have to configure the server for it?

  Kind regards.

  Xauth is recommended and can be done with the local database or using RADIUS.  All Win2k / 2 k 3/2008 server includes a RADIUS as part of the operating system as IAS server or the NPS server.

  Just to add more security / flexibility and centralize data/configuration for all large organizations, it is necessary. If you think that the strength of users will not develop in the future, you can continue with the local database only.

  Here is a document where you need to study more on this subject.

  How to add authentication (Xauth) AAA PIX IPSec 5.2 and later versions

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_tech_note09186a008010a206.shtml

  Kind regards

  Jatin kone
  -Does the rate of useful messages-

• Balancing on two PIX 525

  I'm creating network solution that will have two firewalls Pix 525 related to two different suppliers. For performance reasons, I'd like my clients to connect to Internet via two firewalls in "round robin" mode. What are my options?

  I want to create something like bridge load Protocol (GLBP) Balancing on the router 2800 series. I do not know and cannot know if Pix supports GLBP. Otherwise, are supported by any similar solution?

  Thanks for any response.

  Hello Milos,

  I have another solution for you for 2 ISP requirement of OER (optimized for Edge sending). Here is the link that will show the multiple scenarios and functionality.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6599/products_data_sheet0900aecd801dfcec.html

  If you find good, then you can run your firewall in failover mode, behind the router master REL for reasons of security, but not for purposes of routing.

  2nd solution could be to ACB with multiple tracking Options:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk364/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080211f5c.shtml

  In the 2nd solution also, you can use PIX behind the router in for regular security to security policies.

  3rd solution: you can use 2 2800 routers and terminate ISP links on both of them and run GLBP between them.

  Here are the PIX balancing g. load balancing is supported in PIX 7.0 from only:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a008054c4b7.html#wp1102712

  concerning

  Michael C

• PIX 525 R deactivation 1 port 4 FA-port adapter

  Hello

  I have a pix 525 (sw 7.0.1) with restricted permitted whitch limits the interface count to 6. I already have 4port FE installed adapter and I need to install the new gigabit to pix interface. Can I disable one of the interfaces in the 4 port adapter or can I haveto remove any card to add the gigabit interface?

  Currently I use 2 of the 4 interfaces into the 4 port adapter.

  --

  Mikko

  You can leave the card 4FE in there, the last port on this subject is unusable automatically.

• PIX 525 config and VPN configuration

  Hello

  I was asked to work on a customer request to replave sound no cisco FW with a pix 525 and also lead to a VPN solution using this PIX 525.

  I'm not a FW as my main experience is with Routing/Switching, but I have read some documentation and had some hands on a client of vpn300 501 PIX and cisco.  I managed to make it appear the vpn connection, even if all tests have failed (you need to solve any further).

  Customer has its main site with an application that runs on a Web server that must be accessed only through the vpn to: 3rd party + a few remote users.

  The solution, I want to propose to the client is:

  option 1:

  PIX 525 as a vpn server + Cisco vpn 3000 client on all PCs of remote users.

  option 2:

  PIX 525 as a vpn server + vpn client windows on all PCs of remote users

  option 3:

  PIX 525 as vpn + PIX 501 to 3 rd party server + vpn client windows on all PCs of remote users

  First I want to confirm that these motions are feasible.  So which option should I go for knowing that the remote users are only about 10.

  Client doesn't no Ganymede or RADIUS should go for statis userid/pass set up on PIX525?

  Any idea, advice, suggestion is welcome.  Thanks in advance

  Kind regards

  ngtelecom

  Hello

  Option 1

  In my opinion, is the best solution because the PIX 525 will act as a firewall and the VPN server.

  Then, all the clients connect via VPN using Cisco's VPN IPsec client software.

  Option 2

  The advantage of this option is that you do not need to install VPN software on clients (not a problem, only 10 clients)

  The problem is that it does not come with split tunneling and don't provide as good protection as Cisco software.

  Option 3

  This is also valid, and you can do an EasyVPN connection where the 525 is the server and the 501 to the customer.

  Local authentication on the PIX 525 sounds great.

  As a recommendation, the PIX are EoS and the replacement are the ASAs.

  It will be useful.

  Federico.

• VPN site to site Pix 525 ver7.2 (2) and Pix 501 ver 6.3

  Hello!!

  I have problems to establish a vpn between two pix.

  The first pix 525 a version 7.2 (2) an another Pix version 6.3 has this it is not run by myself.

  The fixed phase 1 but send the associated messages

  can help me

  Thank you

  I'm glad you got it working now :)

  Please evaluate the useful messages.

  Concerning

  Farrukh

• Check the process of cpu on a Pix 525 Version 7.2 (2)

  Hi all,

  A few hours ago I got a high CPU usage on my Pix 525 Version 7.2 (2), I wanted to check what process was taking all the CPU, but I noticed that there is no command "show processes".

  I was able to see the percentage of CPU utilization (cpu, CPU utilization show show) but not the list of processes, does anyone know how can I check this?

  Thanks in advance for your help.

  Hi Alfonso,.

  There should be a command "show processes" in 7.2 (2). Make sure you have the appropriate permissions to use this command.

  There's even a command 'show proc cpu-hog' who will show you the last three albums CPU hogging deals, and when they were last hogging CPU:

  Pix525/pri/law # sh proc cpu-hog

  Process: Unit, shipping NUMHOG: 2, MAXHOG: 7158, LASTHOG: 110

  LASTHOG at: 19:38:57 EDT April 3, 2009

  PC: 113a4b

  Traceback: 1154a 0 1123f0

  Process: this / console, NUMHOG: 2, MAXHOG: 330, LASTHOG: 320

  LASTHOG at: 11:53:57 EDT July 18, 2007

  PC: fe809d

  Traceback: 1008 has 51 10087 1007ee3 has 6 100ae4f 1021716 10216d 3 102142a

  101d0dd 100 c 149 100bee3 100bcb4 ffe27a febbb4 1006b 26

  Process: ssh, NUMHOG: 8, MAXHOG: 238, LASTHOG: 230

  LASTHOG in: 02:00:37 EDT April 27, 2009

  PC: 100a 720

  Traceback: 10087f6 100ae4f 102166a 102142 has 101d0dd 100 c 149 100bee3

  100bcb4 ffe27a febbb4 10069e5 ff8806 fea054 1006b 26

• See snmp community string

  Maybe I'm missing something here, but it seems that once you set snmp community name, it is removed from the display and can be seen again. No luck via the CLI also.

  Is this true or am I just missing something here? If the community name is hidden then how we discover the same?

  Thank you

  GD

  Of NXOS, for example.

   bdsol-6120-05-A# connect nxos bdsol-6120-05-A(nxos)# sh run | i community snmp-server community CISCO group network-operator

• Card crypto controls lock-up PIX 525

  Does anyone know why my PIX 525 crashes when I apply my a cryptomap both command line? I first apply the following ACL. But when I try to apply the first line of cryptomap my PIX locks and I have to restart... Any help would be greatly appreciated >

  permit access ip xx.xx.0.0 255.192.0.0 list XXXXXtunnel xx.xx.18.0 255.255.255.0

  access-list allowed sheep xx.xx.0.0 xx.xx.xx.0 255.255.255.0 xx.xx.0.0 ip

  allowed to access-list acl-inner ip xx.xx.0.0 xx.xx.0.0 xx.xx.xx.0 xx.xx.xx.0

  xxx_map 157 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  card crypto xxx_map 157 correspondence address xxx-tunnel

  card crypto xxx_map 157 counterpart set xx.4.xx.xx

  card crypto xxx_map 157 transform-set xxx_set

  Hello

  I came across this problem when there are other entries already exist under the same crypto map, and are already applied to an interface.

  I found that by denying first crypto map interface command, change the config and re - apply the interface command then it will work very well.

  So...

  (1) no xxx_map interface card crypto outside

  (2) place the lines of crypto map configuration

  (3) interface xxx_map crypto map out

  Of course, you will lose the existing tunnels if some already set up but then this happens if you reboot anyway!

  It may be useful

• Percentage of availability of PIX 525

  Anyone know the PIX 525 percentage availability or time place of this device?

  Hello

  Predicted MTBF of 414 600 for the PIX-525.

  The MTBF on the 520 has been approximately 60,000 hours

  Thank you

  Nadeem

• interface maximum pix 525

  Hi all

  a question about the PIX-525-UR, the brochure said two 10/100 Fast Ethernet on board and the support of the Gigabit Ethernet, up to eight 10/100 FE or three interfaces Ethernet Gigabit.

  http://www.Cisco.com/univercd/CC/TD/doc/product/iaabu/PIX/pix_sw/v_63/hig63/525.htm

  I understand that we got 3 PCI ports and 2 10/100 onboard, but research on the above page

  i've got on the Options of unrestricted Interface

  2 4 - port FE, which makes a total of 10 interface.

  How can it be possible? It allows to disable two interface?

  Then I saw on the forum that the 525 supports a GigE interface (but not at full speed) and that about 1 to 4 FE + 2 GE ports?

  What limitation?

  Thank you

  Patrizio

  Q. did you means 'You may 8 interfaces to the maximum on the 525 UR'? (10-total 2 off = 8)

  A. that's correct. A 525 UR lights only 8 interfaces in the software. If you add two 4 ports, the last 2 ports on the 2nd map cards will be disabled.

  Q. I wondering what kind of constraint on the interface, GigE, example not at full speed, what it means?

  A. GigE interface on the PIX runs at full rate. What is meant when people say that a 525 is not a true firewall in concert, it's that the 525 has a flow of about 330 MB/s max, which is clearer than a concert. The 535 is a true firewall in concert because it has a flow of more than 1000 MB/s.

  Two interfaces Gig is supported on the 525 and both support the full power of concert on the map. However, there will be delays in passing the packets to the CPU if the PIX is trying to pass more than 330 MB/s or more.

  Make a little more sense?

  Scott

• PIX 525 level v6.0 to v6.2 (1) or v6.2 (2)?

  I've upgraded the code on all our PIX.

  I was moving to code 6.2 for adding features and the ability to update of PDM to support the consolidation and VPN.

  Most firewalls are 515 s but I have a pair of 525 s 6.0 running (1).

  Open caveats for 6.2 (2) are... CSCdx89579 PIX 525 crashes intermittently.

  The release notes for the 6.2 (1) the earlier version is not a caveat to 525 breaks down.

  My question:

  That caveat introduced in 6.2 (2) or simply not found in 6.2 (1)? If it was introduced in 6.2 (2) at least I can set it to 6.2 (1) for this pair. No one knows how many times and in what circumstances this happens?

  Thank you

  Scot

  This bug is seen only in a failover pair, and even in this case only when say a person is a "write pending" on a PIX and someone else makes a "write mem" on the other. Basically when two orders are executed at the same time, it * may * happen. Very rare, given that a single customer by the look of it.

  This bug is also in point 6.1, in fact it has been discovered in this code, which is why it appears in the notes of 6.2 version. In fact, he is also fixed in 6.0 code, which means that the bug was, it's just that no one has been to her then.

  It was fixed and integrated in some draft versions of the code, no versions of release. You can open a TAC case if you wish and ask for one of these versions (they will be able to look to the high no problem as long as you give them the ID of the bug). Of course then you will run draft code, it's up to you if you want to do it or not.