Y at - it no problem network peer-to-peer, with two setting two machines to Vista XP machines and a 7 machine

Similar Questions

• Best practices for network configuration of vSphere with two subnets?

  Well, then I'll set up 3 ESXi hosts connected to storage shared with two different subnets. I configured the iSCSI initiator and the iSCSI with his own default gateway - 192.168.1.1 - targets through a Cisco router and did the same with the hosts configured with its own default gateway - 192.168.2.2. I don't know if I should have a router in the middle to route traffic between two subnets since I use iSCSI ports linking and grouping of NETWORK cards. If I shouldn't use a physical router, how do I route the traffic between different subnets and use iSCSI ports binding at the same time. What are the best practices for the implementation of a network with two subnets vSphere (ESX host network: iSCSI network)? Thank you in advance.

  Install the most common iSCSI would be traffic between hosts and

  the storage is not being routed, because a router it could reduce performance.

  If you have VLAN 10(192.168.1.0/24) iSCSI, VLAN 20 (192.168.2.0/24) ESX

  MGMT and VLAN 30 (192.168.3.0/24) comments VMs and VLAN 40 (192.168.4.0/24)

  vMotion a deployment scenario might be something like:

  NIC1 - vSwitch 0 - active VMK (192.168.1.10) MGMT, vMotion VMK (192.168.4.10)

  standby

  NIC2 - vSwitch 1 - current (VLAN30) guest virtual machine port group

  NIC3 - vSwitch 2 - active VMK1 (192.168.1.10) iSCSI

  NIC4 - vSwitch 2 - active VMK2 (192.168.1.11) iSCSI

  NIC5 - vSwitch 1 - current (VLAN30) guest virtual machine port group

  NIC6 - vSwitch 0 - MGMT VMK (192.168.2.10) standby, vMotion

  VMK (192.168.4.10) active

  You would place you on VLAN 10 storage with an IP address of something like target

  192.168.1.8 and iSCSI traffic would remain on this VLAN. The default value

  gateway configured in ESXi would be the router the VLAN 20 with an ip address of

  something like 192.168.2.1. I hope that scenario help set some options.

  Tuesday, June 24, 2014 19:16, vctl [email protected]>

• Problem of Mode full screen with Base of BACK in Windows Vista program

  I have a program from base of BACK, but I can't go full-screen with my BACK Basic program. In order to solve my problem quickly.

  Here is a link to a similar problem with a number of proposed solutions: http://www.askageek.com/2007/12/20/how-to-run-an-old-dos-program-in-full-screen-using-windows-vista/.

  Here is another article to resolve the problem (and note the links to other sites that may also help) from Microsoft:http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb; EN-US; 926657. I'm not sure I like the idea of using the XP drivers on the Vista system (it seems unfair), but the article comes from Microsoft if...

  Here's another option to run the BACK of the screen maximized in Vista with some possible solutions:http://www.walkernews.net/2007/06/03/how-to-maximize-vista-command-prompt-window/.

  I hope this helps.  Keep me in the loop.

  Good luck!

  Lorien - MCSA/MCSE/network + / has + - if this post solves your problem, please click the 'Mark as answer' or 'Useful' button at the top of this message. Marking a post as answer, or relatively useful, you help others find the answer more quickly.

• My computer crashes randomly (usually by moving the mouse) and Microsoft, NVIDIA tried everything to fix it with no luck. Anyone having this problem? I have an Alienware Area 51 with two video cards in SLI 8800 and 4 GB of RAM.

  The display freezes randomly. The Windows desktop, on the Web pages and during the games. This problem started when I had Vista and I have improved the thought that the BONE was the problem. It is not the case. I added 2 GB of the thought of RAM I need more to no luck. I have now deleted 1 graphics card and the problem persists. I deleted all software except the OS and the problem persists. When you start Windows in safe mode, that the computer does not freeze.

  You are either having a video card driver problem or a ram memory stick problem.  I suggest that you check your ram and the settings in the BIOS.  Use security settings BIOS for the ram as the auto setting.  The Intels i7 have a little problem sometimes with more than one ram Strip and having the highest speed at stake.  Check this and get back with me. I have a simple philosophy: just assume everyone is a piece of c.r.a.p. and then be pleasantly surprised if you find someone who is not.

• VMware device with 2 network cards claiming the same IP address with two MAC addresses

  Hello.

  I see messages intermittent my gateway network two MAC addresses associated with a virtual machine running on a 5.5 ESXi host for the same IP address.

  The virtual machine is a MiTel 3300 controller for a VOIP system. the system is configured with two IP addresses, one on the local network and another with a public IP address in the DMZ. In the network configuration of the 3300, I assigned the address LAN IP at 00: 0C: 29:30:B2:B2 and the DMZ IP at 00: 0C: 29:30:B2:BC (Mac for network devices presented by the ESXi host virtual machine).

  On the host, I configured a vSwitch with exclusive access to two physical network adapters on the host machine. The vSwitch is configured with two machine virtual port groups, LAN and DMZ, with access to the physical network interface cards. Tab grouping of groups vSwitch port NIC, I replaced the order of failover of the switch to activate an active NETWORK card only for the Group of LAN ports and the other card NETWORK only for the DMZ port group. (I don't know how the content of the column of networks is determined. Neither is correct for the traffic on the physical switch. If these are configurable, please advise and I'll change the settings). The relevant parameters of vSwitch, groups of ports and VM are distinguished below.

  On the virtual machine itself, through the VMWare host, I assigned 00: 0C: 29:30:B2:B2 for the Group of LAN ports and 00: 0C: 29:30:B2:BC to the DMZ group port (best I can tell, anyway, since the MAC address field annoyingly obscures the last two digits of the MAC address - break if I invert the mapping) (, but all seems OK).

  The goal here is to make sure that MACs of ports vSwitch the 3300 is listening and sending always correspond to the physical ports that are VLAN Tag by the physical switch to ensure the routing. Generally speaking, it seems that what is happening but, intermittently, we cross one-way calls that suggests a problem of routing between us and our SIP trunk provider; coinciding with these incidents, I get an email along the lines of "the security in the network device has detected a conflict of IP address with two or more devices. The period of INVESTIGATION "DMZ. DMZ. DMZ. DMZ' is claimed by the following clients with MAC addresses: ' 00: 0C: 29:30:B2:B2' ' 00: 0C: 29:30:B2:BC'. »

  I did something in the configuration that would lead to this kind of collision intermittent? Have a hacked together a way to do something that could be accomplished in a way that is simpler and more reliable?

  Thanks for any idea that you can offer.

  Kind regards

  J.

  

  

  

  I probably don't fully understand your configuration, but it seems that you are not interested in using the collection of NETWORK adapters in the virtual switch of the VM MiTel 3300.

  If it is correct, why not create two virtual switches, each with a group of port (LAN and DMZ) unique and with a separate connection of (vmnic2 and vmnic1)?

  In general, collection of NETWORK adapters may be used to share traffic between uplinks and ensure that if one of the uplinks connect fails, a virtual machine still has access to the network.

• Card problem NETWORK M30, exchange of memory + HDD replacement

  Hello
  The first problem is with the network card in my laptop. It seems to work OK in windows (it looks fine in Device Manager, I can change settings etc) but it doesn't recognize any cable. I must say that I have enough experience on the networks. I tested the two straight through and crossing of the cables that work in other systems. I connected to a switch with a straight through cable, but don't see the network card. No. led flashes on the card (before he did)... nothing. It says "disconnected network cable" on the status bar. If I use a usb instead, with the same parameters and cable network card, everything is I checked the card using a cd live linux. It can identify the map, but I can't ping it and of course it is not regognise no cable.
  I'm 99% sure that it's a hardware problem. It is covered by the limited warranty of 2 years, right? The main question is: is the card integrated on motherboard of the laptop? Should I change motherboard too, in order to correct the network card?

  The second "problem" is a memory module. I checked with utility of a toshiba who said that the ram is faulty. Toshiba service sent me information for the Exchange since 09.11.2004 with the State shown above:
  Current status - Description
  Announcement - gathered information on the unit and the customer and the service center was informed. The unit did not here yet.

  Can someone help me with this? I'm looking for when the module will be available? I can't be based on a faulty ram memory!

  And one last question. I would like to change my hard drive for a faster. I can change it myself or it will cause a problem with the warranty?

  Thank you for your time.

  Hi sub,.

  You're right about the guarantee. Your machine is trembling warranty of 2 years. If the network card is faulty it can not be changed separately. You need to change the motherboard. Be careful with warranty. Do not change the only hardware components. You can lose it.

  In your case, there are a few hardware problems. In my opinion the best way is to contact the after-sales Service of Toshiba partner. Visit this link
  http://EU.computers.Toshiba-Europe.com/cgi-bin/ToshibaCSG/generic_content.jsp?service=EU&ID=ASP_SUPPORT
  Good bye

• Problem network two computers together

  Home network with two computers, both running XP Home edition.  The two computers connected (wired) to a single router.  An external network, also on the network drive.  In the past, everything works perfectly.  Computers have been able to share files.  Computer could print via printers shared on computer B.

  Current condition.  Computer A cannot access the file or print sharing on computer B.  Computer B can access A computer as always.  Computer cannot ping computer B, but B can ping A.  Both computers have no problem asccessing the network drive.  Both computers have the same workgroup name.  I tried to run the wizzard of configuration network several times, making sure that the workgroup name is set correctly, but without success.  The message I get is: "workgroup is not accessible.  You can not have the permissions to use this network resource.  Admin contact...  Network not found path.

  The problem may have started after an update of McAfee antivirus software.  I tried to disable Firewall (McAfee and windows) on computer A and even uninstalled McAfee, but still can not computer A to do B.

  Of course, any help on where to find would be appreciated.

  Home network with two computers, both running XP Home edition.  The two computers connected (wired) to a single router.  An external network, also on the network drive.  In the past, everything works perfectly.  Computers have been able to share files.  Computer could print via printers shared on computer B.

  Current condition.  Computer A cannot access the file or print sharing on computer B.  Computer B can access A computer as always.  Computer cannot ping computer B, but B can ping A.  Both computers have no problem asccessing the network drive.  Both computers have the same workgroup name.  I tried to run the wizzard of configuration network several times, making sure that the workgroup name is set correctly, but without success.  The message I get is: "workgroup is not accessible.  You can not have the permissions to use this network resource.  Admin contact...  Network not found path.

  The problem may have started after an update of McAfee antivirus software.  I tried to disable Firewall (McAfee and windows) on computer A and even uninstalled McAfee, but still can not computer A to do B.

  Of course, any help on where to find would be appreciated.

  Have you used the Tool McAfee Consumer Product Removal?  If this is not the case, do.

  Both computers have at least one account with the same name and password?

  A very old (but XP has been around for a long time) message by Malke MVP MS:

  For XP, start by running the Network Setup Wizard the on all machines (see warning in section A below).

  Problems sharing files between computers on a network are usually caused by 1) a misconfigured firewall or a firewall neglected (including a dynamic firewall in a virtual private network); or (2) inadvertently run two firewalls such as the firewall of Windows and a third-party firewall. and/or (3) do not have accounts to the same users and passwords on all computers in the workgroup. (4) tries to create actions where the operating system does not.

  A. configure the firewall on all machines to allow traffic to local area network (LAN) as being approved. With the Windows Firewall, it means which allows file sharing / print on the Exceptions tab normally run the XP Network Setup Wizard will take care of this for these machines. The only "witch hunt", it will turn on the XPSP2 Windows Firewall. If you are not running a third-party firewall or you have an antivirus with "Internet Worm Protection" (like Norton 2006/07) which acts as a firewall, you're fine. With a third-party firewall, I usually set up the allocation of LAN with an IP address range. E.g. would be 192.168.1.0 - 192.168.1.254. Obviously you would substitute your correct subnet. Do not run more than one firewall. DON'T STOP FIREWALLS; CONFIGURE THEM CORRECTLY.

  (B) to facilitate the Organization, put all computers in the same workgroup. This is done from the System applet in Control Panel, the computer name tab.

  C. create the counterpart of the user accounts and passwords on all machines. You do not need to be logged into the same account on all machines and assigned to each user account passwords can be different; accounts/passwords just need to exist and to match on all machines. DO NOT NEGLECT TO CREATE PASSWORDS, EVEN IF ONLY OF SIMPLE. If you want a machine to boot directly to the desktop (a particular user account) for convenience, you can do this. The instructions on this link work for XP and Vista: set up Windows for the connection automatically (MVP Ramesh) - http://windowsxp.mvps.org/Autologon.htm

  D. Si one or more of the computers is XP Pro or Media Center, turn off Simple file sharing (Folder Options > view tab).

  E. create share as you wish. XP Home does not share the users directory or the Program Files, but you can share folders inside those directories. A better choice is to simply use the Shared Documents folder. See the first link above for more information on Vista sharing.

  F. you have the job of file sharing (and tested by exchanging a file between machines), if you want to share a printer connected locally to one of your computers, share of this machine. Then go to the printer mftr Web site. and download the latest drivers for the correct system. Install them on the target machines. The printer must be collected during the installation procedure. If this isn't the case, install the drivers and then use the Add Printer Wizard. In some cases, printers must be installed as local printers, but it is outside this response.

• Outlook Express 6: your server has unexpectedly ended the connection. The potential causes for this include server problems, network problems, or a long period of inactivity. Error number: 0x800ccc0f

  Original title: Windows XP and Outlook Express 6

  I have a new computer with outlook express and went through the set up instructions.  When I tried to send a test email, I got this error message:

  "Your server has terminated suddenly the connection. The possible causes for this include server problems, network problems, or a long period of inactivity. Account: 'pop.mail.yahoo.com', server: 'pop.mail.yahoo.com', Protocol: POP3, Port: 110, secure (SSL): Yes, error number: 0x800CCC0F. »

  How can I fix this error message and have e-mail sent via Outlook?

  Hi Jeanette Logan,
   
  Here is an article that addresses this issue. Follow the steps listed in the article for this problem:
   
  Troubleshooting error messages that you receive when you try to send and receive e-mail in Outlook and Outlook Express

• Trying to replace a XP computer with another XP computer in a peer-to-peer network with two other computers.

  Replace a XP computer with another XP computer in a peer-to-peer network with two other computers. became terribly frustrating. I spent a day and a half by train to get there. I know MS wants everyone to buy their new OS, but I can't afford it right now. In the meantime, I'm trying to add a computer to my existing peer-to-peer network. I have never had so much trouble. I can not get computers to eachother Duke on the network.

  Over the past 3 years I have implemented each of the existing computers. I'm familiar with the silly quirks of this operating system (i.e. a few hours waiting see if eventually the computers will warm up to each other and decide to play nice together). All computers are able to connect to the internet through the same router connection, and I was able to get each of the computers to see one another, but not all, but none of the computers is to see the new computer. (The new computer is connected to ONE of the other computers, but stopped doing and do again it). Is there a simple step by step to do this? I don't care even if I can't not all computers on the network as a whole, I would like to just the computer I replace to see the computer I replace by in order to obtain the transferred files and get back to work.

  I appreciate sincerely ANY help ANYONE can offer.

  Hi okcbz,

  1. How many computers on the network?

  I suggest you have a look at the following links in the article:

  Introduction to Windows Peer-to-Peer network

  How to set up a small network with Windows XP Home Edition (PART 1)

  Windows XP Help & how-to
  

• A network peer-to-peer can be run on a Windows XP Home Edition computer.

  A network peer-to-peer can be run on a Windows XP Home Edition computer.

  A network peer-to-peer can be run on a Windows XP Home Edition computer.

  Yes.

  Now please explain exactly what it is you want to do.

• Your server suddenly put an end to the connection. The possible causes for this include server problems, network problems, or a long period of inactivity.

  Your server suddenly put an end to the connection. The possible causes for this include server problems, network problems, or a long period of inactivity. Topic "business profile]', account:"pop.bizmail.yahoo.com", server:"smtp.bizmail.yahoo.com"', Protocol: SMTP, server response: ' 451 see http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html. ', Port: 25, secure (SSL): no, Server error: 451, error number: 0x800CCC0F"

  Your server suddenly put an end to the connection. The possible causes for this include server problems, network problems, or a long period of inactivity. Topic "business profile]', account:"pop.bizmail.yahoo.com", server:"smtp.bizmail.yahoo.com"', Protocol: SMTP, server response: ' 451 see http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html. ', Port: 25, secure (SSL): no, Server error: 451, error number: 0x800CCC0F"

  You must make a few changes, not only on outgoing parameters, your incoming parameters also need changes.

  Open your e-mail program > tools > accounts > your bizmail account > properties > servers, under outgoing mail server, check "this server requires authentication" > apply > advanced, under outgoing (SMTP) mail change to 465 not 25. Put a check mark on "this server requires a secure connection (SSL)" > under incoming (POP3) mail, change it to 995 no 110. Put a check mark on "this server requires a secure connection (SSL)" > OK

  t-4-2

• Problems with Windows XP Pro to Windows Vista computer networking

  I'm totally frustrated. I got a home network that worked with a PC running Windows XP Home and a laptop running Vista Basic. Then, I added a PC running XP Pro and it has added to the network. He works for a while and I was able to share files and printers. Then all of a sudden I can't access Windows XP Pro PC to Vista Basic laptop and get the following message:

  "\\PC1\My documents is not accessible. You might not have permission to use this network resource. Contact the administrator of this server to find out if you have access permissions.

  Not enough server storage is available to process this command. »

  I tried the solutions for the "memory insufficient servier" problem but none of them are working and none of them address the element of authorization. Vista Basic laptop can still access the XP computer at home and the XP Pro computer can access the Vista Basic laptop but the laptop Vista Basic responds with the above message whenever I try to open the files on the XP Pro computer.

  I tried to reconfigure the network from the Vista Basic laptop, but every time I have save the setup.exe on a flash drive network and then try to run is one of the PC Windows XP he says the information is not readable, and I need to rerun the Configuration Wizard from the network on the original computer. When I try to reverse the process by running the Configuration Wizard from the network on XP computers then the Vista laptop, he fails and suggested that I have configure the network manually. I'm sick of this. Can anyone help.

  So I have not tested, but I saw where he works for others.

  METHOD 1: Via local security policy:
  NOTE: This function is for Vista business, integral and Enterprise versions
  only. For Vista Home Basic edition Home Premium, see METHOD 2 below.

  1 open administrative tools.
  NOTE: In the Start Menu or the control panel (Classic view).
  2. click on local security policy.
  3. in the left pane, click the triangle next to local policy.
  4. in the left pane, click Security Options.
  5. in the right-down pane, click Network Security: LAN manager
  authentication level.
  6. click on the menu drop-down and click Send LM & NTLM - use NTLMv2 session
  security if negotiated.
  7. click on OK.
  8 restart the computer.

  METHOD 2: Registry Hack:
  NOTE: This is for Vista Home versions.

  1. open the Start Menu.
  2. in the area of the white line (search), type regedit and press ENTER.
  3. click on continue for UAC prompt.
  4. in regedit, go to :-HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Contro l\Lsa
  5. in the right pane, right-click on LmCompatibilityLevel and click on modify.
  NOTE: If it does not already exist, create a DWORD value named
  LmCompatibilityLevel
  6. set the value to 1
  7 reboot

  MCP. MCDST. LVL 80

• Problem VPN site to Site with overlapping networks

  We currently have a PIX 515E firewall as a headboard with many tunnels of site-to-site configured for her with the enpoints of PIX 506. Our internal LAN addressing scheme is 172.18.0.0 255.255.0.0. Addresses of local network in two of the remote networks with congigured VPN site-to-site are 172.18.107.0 255.255.255.224 and 172.18.107.32 255.255.255.0. Remote network access to all services on our internal network very well. We have 20 other network segments configured the same way. The 172.18.107.32.0 network needs to communicate with the 172.18.107.0 network for the services of file on the other remote PIX. Since the station PIX will not allow traffic to leave the same interface it came we thought with him we would just set up a tunnel from site to site between the two remote LAN. After the configuration of the site to another remote firewalls do not appear to try to establish tunnels when sending valuable traffic. I turned on debug for ISAKMP and nothing is either sent or received on a remote Firewall with regard to these tunnels. It's almost like since we already have a tunnel set to our 172.18.0.0 internal LAN that the remote PIX will not build specifically to 172.18.107.0 tunnel. I am able to ping each remote peer with each other and hear protection rules, but nothing has ever been established.

  Is what we are trying to do possible? Sorry for the long post but the kind of a strange scenario. Thanks in advance for any help.

  In what order are the numbers of seqence card crypto for configuring vpn on pix distance units? It could be that you are trying to install is a lot and will be checked later as head of pix. If this is the case, then yes the 172.18/16 road prevail the 172.18.107/24. Try to rebuild the entrance card crypto with a lower number so that traffic to 172.18.107/24 comes first.

  I would like to know how it works.

• Network problem between Windows 7 laptop with the Windows XP desktop computer via Linksys WRT54 router.

  Original title: network problem!

  How can I get my laptop with Windows 7 Home Edition to connect to my desktop with Windows XP on it. I have a router Linksys WRT54 plugged directly to the desktop via ethernet and my laptop has an excellent signal but I can't access programs or the printer with it. I know the 'host group' on 7 but XP isn't that. Are there alternative than to put 7 on my desktop? Any suggestions?

  Thank you!

  Hello

  Thanks for posting your query in Microsoft Community and we give the opportunity to help you.

  According the description of the problem face you connection problems in Windows 7 laptop with the Windows XP desktop computer via Linksys WRT54 router.

  Residential group option is available on Windows 7 and Windows 8 operating systems. However, you can see the following article for more information on the connection of Windows 7 and Windows XP computers:

  Networking of computers running different versions of Windows

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-in/Windows7/networking-home-computers-running-different-versions-of-Windows

  Hope this information helps. For any other corresponding Windows help, do not hesitate to contact us and we will be happy to help you.

• Problem network AirPrint

  I recently bought a HP printer of 5520e for its ability to AirPrint. I have a wireless network at home consisting of a hub of fiber of sky with two Linksys Powerline adapters. The printer is near one of the Powerline adapters. My Ipad picks up the printer anywhere in the House, but at least it gets wifi adapter Powerline nearest the printer signal form, when I try to print it says 'Connection to the printer' for about 2 minutes, then 'The printer Preparation', then the message box disappears. A minute or two later a message box is displayed indicating that the printer is offline.

  When I first set up the printer it worked fine, then I must have accidentally changed a setting somewhere.

  Can someone help, please?

  Thank you.

  The only suggestion I have, comes from one thing, you said that has scratching me my head. To my knowledge, the router and your access points should all be using the same channel.

  Think of it as walkie-talkies, if you are not on the same channel, you can not hear the other person. If you are close to the same channel can you pick up a word or two through the static method. My thought is that, and what some verified by printing things where close to the access point but not others, to wireless interference. The router, three access points to the printer with all the different channels, information is just disappearing. Try to configure your access points and network to use the same channel and see what happens.

  Channel 1, 6 & 11 are the most common, if you have other routers (neighbouring with wireless) near you, use something between these numbers.

  It would be interesting to try, and I'm curious to hear the results if you do.

  See you soon,.