Z61m modernization project

Similar Questions

• AE crashes when loading project "occurred. invoking the plug-in"stabilizer Warp"effect Details.

  Start with my PC Info:

  

  and a few details:

  

  So I tied first Pro cs6 in after composition affects CS6. Last night, I was working on it, everything was fine, I exported a test copy and that worked, everything was great for the night and I saved and closed. Tried to re - open the project this morning in Premier Pro and it would not load, so I opened after affects and I get the following error messages. I am able to load other projects successfully, and I do not to move any assets after that I closed last night programs. I tried to restart and reload several times and I get the same error messages constantly. I sought advice for similar problems and found some possible solutions #1 'use capslock at the opening of the modernization project to delete. Then re - make the effects that are causing problems. I tried this and it doesn't seem to work, but I can't have done it correctly, I simply pressed caps lock shift and made sure it's on when I clicked on the project to load, however I got the same errors. #2 delete the cache for the project and the new rendering. I can't locate the files in cache for this project in the affects on the record, is this referring to the cache files in Premiere Pro? I admit I'm a little afraid to do...

  \

  

  How would you recommend all that I proceed? I am entirely willing to add a link to files or do anything that needs to be done. I'm also curious of what happened... If I can avoid it in the future.

  The after effects CC (12,2) update corrects a cause of an accident involving the effect of auto contrast, auto levels effect and the related effects.

  Let us know how it works for you after installing the update.

• Cannot open a file in MultiSim 11

  I just got of Multisim 11 and I'm going through all my MS10 files to convert them to 11 (it would be nice if there was a way to do this automatically.)  In any case, the attached file will not open in MS11 but opens fine in MS10.  It's sort of an eccentric with a lot of graphics.  I suspect a bug in 11.

  It is in fact a way of mass conversion a bunch of files with element of projects improved Multisim 11.0.

  1. create a new project (file > package and projects > new project).

  2. in the design Toolbox, right-click on the "Schematic" within the project group and choose 'add a file... '. »

  3. in the file selection dialog, you can add one file at a time, or several ones with multiple selection.

  4. Repeat steps 2 and 3 in as many folders as you want.

  5. Once you have added all the files that you want to upgrade, upgrade the project (file > projects and packaging > modernization project).

  This will create a new file ms11 with in the same place, name and the folder as all the old files (leaving old files intact).

  If you do this for a lot of files, it may take several minutes (the file format has changed dramatically with v11.0 so there is a lot of ongoing work), but it is easier to do by hand.

  In what concerns your a file that will not be converted-, it seems that one of the objects (yellow wire) is damaged.  I find that in v10.1.1, a double click on this thread do not implement a property page.  When I opened this file in v10.1.1 and resave it, I can now open in v11.0, but the yellow thread is always corrupt.  It would be preferable to delete this thread in v10 and redraw it before the conversion.

  I hope this helps!

• DHCP Snooping

  Scenerio:

  As part of a modernization project of tech in a big campus and because of several problems caused by users (l) connect the routers on the network and causing DHCP issues, I'm looking to turn on DHCP snooping. During the tech switches access update will be updated first and then the kernel. The new access switches are 4510R + E/Sup7, running the latest IOS XE base license and just passing through. New carrots are 6509 Sup 720's configured as a cluster VSS, manage all routing for VIRTUAL local area networks and have the statements of support IP. The DHCP server which takes care of all the VLAN is a Windows 2008 server that is directly connected to the base.

  I also read all the info I could find on DHCP snooping, but I'm still a little fuzzy on if it changes the way that the DHCP server handles requests.

  Issues related to the:

  • Because the access switches pass only, they only need monitoring DHCP enabled (in the world and on VIRTUAL local area networks) and their uplinks to the core set as being approved, right? In particular, they only declarations of support IP or Layer-3 interfaces for all of their VIRTUAL local networks, right?
  • While I understand that DHCP snooping will be ineffective if it is not lit on the kernel, there is no reason I can't deploy it first to the access layer without touching the basic configurations to avoid large amounts of documents of change control, right? Then, when the kernel is put at level and DHCP snooping successfully activated that will work.
  • I got that on the layer to access the switches uplink to the core are approved, but I'm not 100% on the question of whether the same interfaces are approved on the carrots. I don't think but want to be sure. Carrots of course trust the real interface on that server DHCP is plugged
  • The most confusing part is all the stuff from the Option-82. As near as I can tell its option for the server to use the information from the Option-82. I think that if all I do is enable DHCP snooping on worldwide and on the right VIRTUAL LANs the DHCP relay between the core and the DHCP server will continue to work as it is today, is that correct?

  Is there really this traps or in my case I really just need to turn it on in the world and by vlan, trust the uplinks on the access switches and the DHCP server on the kernel interface and call it a day?

  Thank you

  Nathan Spitzer

  SR Network Communications analyst.

  Lockheed Martin

  Hello Nathan,.

  Given that the access switches are only switching, they only need DHCP snooping turned on (both globally and on the VLANS) and their uplinks to the core set as trusted, right?

  Fix.

  In particular they dont need IP helper statements or layer-3 interfaces for all of their VLANS, right?

  Fix. The statement of support ip address would only be necessary if switches performed routing inter - VLAN and the DHCP server is located in a VLAN different.

  While I understand that DHCP snooping will only be marginally effective if it is not turned on on the core, there is no reason I cannot deploy it first at the access layer without touching the core configurations to avoid large amounts of change-control paperwork, right? Then when the core is upgraded and DHCP snooping properly enabled it will work. 

  To my knowledge, the opposite is true. DHCP Snooping is a service of access protection layer - is it not in the core of the network. It has nothing to protect in the kernel once DHCP messages have beein properly disinfected at the edge of the network. For some inexplicable reason, many people think that the DHCP Snooping should be enabled on the network. The fact is that the DHCP Snooping protects against

  • DHCP messages are sent to ineligible devices
  • Ineligible devices posing as DHCP servers

  From this it naturally follows that it is the limit of the network, or the layer of access, where such protection is the most effective. So in your case, I believe that the activation of the DHCP Snooping only on the access layer is actually what you want to do.

  I got that on the access layer switches the uplinks to the core are trusted, but I am not 100% on whether the same interfaces are trusted on the cores. I dont think so but want to be sure. Of cource the cores do trust the actual interface the DHCP server is plugged in on

  If you enable the DHCP Snooping on the basic features and uplink between the access switches and core would have to be configured as confidence both on the basic switches and access. Otherwise, the base ports would pass DHCP messages received from customers because the access layer switches running DHCP Snooping insert DHCP Option 82 in the DHCP messages sanitized and ports untrustred delete all DHCP messages including 82 of the present Option.

  2960 Configuration Guide to

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/switches/LAN/catalyst2960/software/release/12.2_55_se/configuration/guide/swdhcp82.html#wp1078853

  The switch removes a DHCP packet when one of these situations occurs:

  • Comes from a packet to a DHCP server, for example a DHCPOFFER, DHCPACK, DHCPNAK or DHCPLEASEQUERY package, outside the network or firewall.

  • A packet is received on an interface that is not reliable, and do not match the source MAC address and hardware address of the DHCP client.

• The switch receives a message DHCPRELEASE or DHCPDECLINE with a MAC address in the DHCP snooping database binding, but the information in the database of linking interface does not correspond to the interface on which the message was received.

• A DHCP relay agent sends a DHCP packet that includes a relay agent IP address which is not 0.0.0.0 or relay agent transmits a packet that includes information of option-82 to an untrusted port.

As I have indicated, however, I personally discourage running DHCP Snooping on the basic devices - I see no reason for this. Please correct if I am wrong!

The most confusing part is all the Option-82 stuff. As near as I can tell its optional for the server to use the Option-82 information. I believe that if all I do is turn DHCP snooping on globally and on the right VLANS the DHCP relaying between the core and the DHCP server will continue working just like it is today, is that correct?

LOL, my favorite on the DHCP Snooping things is the Option 82 interesting how much this topic brings confusion...

The Option 82 was created to provide DHCP relay agent the ability to identify itself and the customer who sent the original message from DHCP unmodified. The DHCP server can then use this information to perform certain policies of customer trust. The format of the Option 82 is not strictly specified, only its basic structure is fixed. You can read more on this and the whole reason to be in the RFC 3046. One of the key points to remember here, however, is that the DHCP server may or may not recognize the Option 82, but apart from that, to copy the value of the Option 82A received in the message to a DHCP client for all its replies sent to this client.

DHCP Snooping uses the Option 82 differently. He didn't expect and doesn't require that the DHCP Server includes the Option of 82 or manages a special way. The Option 82 is inserted by switches access performing DHCP Snooping and it contains two important parts:

• The Circuit ID that identifies the port to which the client is connected (VLAN and the location of the physical port in a switch)
• The remote ID that identifies the access switch to which the client is connected (by the MAC address of the switch)

See http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst2960/software/release/12.2_55_se/configuration/guide/swdhcp82.html#wp1105589

Now, when an access switch performing DHCP Snooping receives a message from DHCP client on an untrusted port, this will happen:

• The switch will insert the 82 Option in the message of the DHCP client. The Option 82 will identify the specific switch and the port to which the client is attached
• The switch will forward the DHCP message according to its MAC address of destination (i.e. in a completely normal way)
• The server receives the DHCP message containing the Option 82. It is not relevant for DHCP Snooping if the server takes into account the value of the Option 82. However, when the server replies, it will insert the original value of the Option of 82 to the answer.
• Access switch will finally receive the DHCP response. Looking at the Option 82, he knows exactly in which port is the message transmitted to the customer - and only the customer - even if the answer was broadcast!

Note that the Option 82 contributes enormously to identify exactly the access switch and its port where the client is attached. If other switches with DHCP Snooping has received this DHCP message (in reason of the flood or address broadcast requested by the client), they would pass this message because they understand once glancing at the 82 Option that the customer is attached elsewhere. The 82 Option allowing to ensure DHCP communication between a particular client and the DHCP server doesn't leak not to other customers.

There is a hunt for witches, associated with the Option 82. A switch run DHCP Snooping inserts the Option 82 messages DHCP clients. However, each DHCP message contains a field named GIADDR where the IP address of the relay agent is registered, where the DHCP message was relayed. Clearly, when a DHCP message goes through a switch DHCP Snooping, it is not relayed (drawn from one VLAN and rerouted to another), so an access switch does not change the GIADDR that remains set to 0.0.0.0. However, at least the implementation of server DHCP Cisco IOS performs a validation on a test received DHCP messages and it drops DHCP messages containing the Option 82, but which the GIADDR field is set to 0.0.0.0 (i.e. unitialized). This can be seen in the output of the debug ip dhcp server packet :

Router# debug ip dhcp server packet

*Sep 9 01:59:40: DHCPD: inconsistent relay information.

*Sep 9 01:59:40: DHCPD: relay information option exists, but giaddr is zero

Under normal circumstances, such a mental health check makes sense - how is it that a DHCP message contains the Option 82 (i.e. the Relay Agent Information Option DHCP) when there is no DHCP relay identified in the GIADDR? However, with DHCP Snooping on the access layer switches, DHCP messages are normal and expected. Therefore, it is essential to disable this check of mental health on the Cisco box that is running the DHCP server configuration using global ip dhcp relay confidence all information or only is selected routed (i.e. L3) interfaces with command level interface ip dhcp relay reliable information.

To summarize:

• The 82 Option is A Good Thing (TM) because it allows to deliver DHCP messages only to the client for which they are intended. Any suggestions to disable the insertion of the Option 82 on access DHCP Snooping Switches are useless 82 Option is inserted by DHCP Snooping Switches in DHCP messages by default - no additional configuration is necessary.
• Through the easiest way - when you deploy DHCP Snooping, does not initially change anything about the Option 82. Make sure that your customers can receive their config IP via DHCP. If yes then there is nothing to resolve. If not, go further.
• If you run a DHCP server on a Device IOS base (router, switch), you may need to use the command ip dhcp relay information confidence-everything (global config) or ip dhcp relay reliable information (level interface) to allow the DHCP messages with the Add Option 82 and unitialized field GIADDR to be accepted. These commands are required only on the device where the DHCP server is running, not on the access layer switches. You may want to first perform debugging as I suggested previously, and only if you see that packets are dropped, add these commands to the configuration.
• I don't know if these commands should be added also to a DHCP relay function efficient switch - I can check that tomorrow in a laboratory.
• If you are using another DHCP server you have to try experimentally whether happy with the DHCP messages with 82 Option present and unitialized GIADDR field

Sorry for the long answer... I hope that I do not bore you to death. We invite you to ask for more! I'll try to be more concise next time

Best regards

Peter

• Employee numbers in Oracle R12.2.3

  Gurus,

  I'm working on a modernization project in which Oracle HRMS R12.0.6 is already being implemented.  There are 2 groups of companies as the company operates in the geographies.

  I see that in R12.0.6, in the definitions of BG, the following details are configured related to empl/entrepreneurs of numbering:

  Employee: Automatic using the overall sequence

  Contractor: Automatic using the overall sequence

  Applicant: Auto (since iRecruitment is also implemented)

  Now, when I do the configuration in R12.2.3; While creating 2 BGs, initially, I kept the definitions of BG as

  Employee: manual

  Contractor: manual

  Applicant: manual

  This is to ensure that, used conversion has yet to take place.

  Now my requirement is how to change this manual-> automatic numbering using the overall sequence (of course after end if the conversion of the employee)

  Pointers please?

  BR

  Vignesh salvation,

  I got the following note in metalink

  Instructions step by step to implement the global sequencing (Doc ID 259160.1)

• Refreshing the schema...

  Hi all
  
  I'm working on this pattern with expdp/impdb db v.11 modernization project.
  
  I've wasted enough time (1 day) to work on two or three questions, then finally decides to take the help of OTN users and see if we have the best and fast way to do it.
  
  Q:
  1. I want to generate a dynamic menu script to remove tables like '% 100% ', 'backup %', '%ABC%' from a schema of the user, but not able to find a way to do it... I can do manually generate the statement 1 drop for every table as option, but if 50 paintings is there, then too the manual works that I'm ignoring?
  
  2. how to use the EXCLUDE parameter in expdp para file to exclude tables as something like '100% ', 'backup %', '%ABC%': EXCLUDE = table: 'as "100% ',"backup %"," %ABC% "
  
  3 generate a dynamic script for deleting all user objects
  
  4. stop all users of db to access particular schema while importation is happening?
  
  5. to export in line is below parameter no?
  
  flashback_time = "to_timestamp (to_char (sysdate, 'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'),"yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss")" "
  
  
  Thanks in advance for looking into my problems.
  
  Q.4 passed under export to import
  Q.5 added

  Q:
  1. I want to generate a dynamic menu script to remove tables like '% 100% ', 'backup %', '%ABC%' from a schema of the user, but not able to find a way to do it... I can do manually generate the statement 1 drop for every table as option, but if 50 paintings is there, then too the manual works that I'm ignoring?

  A: select 'drop table' | owner: '. ' || table_name |';' from dba_tables where table_name like '100% ' and owner = 'owner '.
  Union of all the
  Select 'drop table' | owner: '. ' || table_name |';' from dba_tables where table_name like 'backup %' and owner = 'owner '.
  Union of all the
  Select 'drop table' | owner: '. ' || table_name |';' from dba_tables where table_name like 'ABC% %' and owner = 'owner '.

  Q:
  Best way to use the EXCLUDE parameter in expdp para file to exclude tables as something like '100% ', 'backup %', '%ABC%': EXCLUDE = table: 'as "100% ',"backup %"," %ABC% "

  A: Download the list of tables from database with as '100% ', 'save', '%ABC% '. Prepare parfile and in parameter exclude give the list of names of tables to aid in clause

  Q: generate a dynamic script for deleting all user objects

  a: select "drop" | object_type | ' '|| owner: '. ' || object_name | ";' from dba_objects where owner = 'SCHEMANAME."

  4. stop all users of db to access particular schema while importation is happening?

  A: open the database limit mode. or stop the listener if the listener listen also for this service (if there are multiple db to access the same listener and then not to do)

  5. Yes

• Problems of clogging MW

  Hi all
  
  I just started to use MW, I installed 2.15 and improved to 2.17 without any problem. I'm level EBS 11.5.10.2 on solaris to R12.1.
  
  I have several nodes
  -MW belonged to oracle on solaris 9
  -Forms apps belonged to applmgr on solaris 9
  -Admin apps belonged to applmgr on solaris 9
  -DB level belonged to oracle on linux
  
  I encountered the following problems.
  -MW has created a patch of merger on the forms node ok apps, but it was owned by oracle (the owner of db MW) and not applmgr (owner-level apps)
  -MW wrote not a patch on the admin layer log file even if the directory already exists, - it worked well on the shape layer
  -adpatch complained an adalldefaults.txt missing on the admin layer though even he was there--belonged to applmgr - it worked well on the shape layer
  
  I tried ssh fine of the MW server to both nodes apps like applmgr.
  
  Someone at - it met something similar?
  
  Thanks in advance
  Jeremy

  First thing to check is the definition of node - connect as a sysadmin and choose roles - choose project for modernization project administrator and of the thenchoose the application node works does not correctly slot define nodes - check all the parameters.

• XPS 630i rehabilitation project - what can be done to modernize an old computer

  7 years on a single computer without difficulty is pretty cool, but its slow significantly, can't do recent games, video stream teams all the time, move files and using video editing software is almost eternal.

  The system is XPS 630i, CPU = QX6850, 3 GHz, 8 MB, CDKE, G0. RAM is 4 GB. video card is two cards of the crossfire Radeon 3800 series.  Vista Home premium 32-bit. storage is disk 920 GB internal and external two drives of 1 TB Buffalo (1 is the backup of the system)

  (1) is there a CPU upgrade option?

  (2) update of what graphics card?

  (3) should move from Vista to another help system?

  (4) is there an option to upgrade to RAM?

  I can still a few years out of this system, with say, $500?

  Thanks for the tips

  JMNessel3

  Thank you Philip for your thoughts.

  My 630i has 4 GB of RAM installed.  Dell said it's the max.  Evolution of operating systems that would change?

  Change to a 64 bit OS you will allow more than 4 GB of RAM and Crucial says that the maximum is 8 GB address:

  http://www.crucial.com/upgrade/Dell-memory/XPS/XPS+630i-upgrades.html

  However DDR2 RAM has increased a lot in price recently and the $142 - $208 maybe not worth it. That money would be better spent on the Solid State Drive.

• ENVY of HP TouchSmart 23-d038c - how to connect and project it on a screen TV with HDMI

  My HP ENVY TouchSmart in one has a HDMI connection and is running Windows 8, how can project what is on my computer screen to separate high-definition TV monitor which has also a HDMI connection? A HP technician said my HDMI connection for "enter".  Can it be converted to 'exit '? Thank you

  chipp7 wrote:

  My HP ENVY TouchSmart in one has a HDMI connection and is running Windows 8, how can project what is on my computer screen to separate high-definition TV monitor which has also a HDMI connection? A HP technician said my HDMI connection for "enter".  Can it be converted to 'exit '? Thank you

  A HP technician said my HDMI connection for "enter".  Can it be converted to 'exit '?

  N ° may not be converted to the output.

  Since you have a type of All - In - One PC, extension and modernization is extremely limited due to the format of the motherboard and the type of case.

• Error when you try to upgrade a project to RH9

  I'm trying to upgrade an 8.0.2 to RH9 HR project. My other projects have updated very well, but I have a specific project that gives me the following error:

  Error - %Rel_420_NeoTool_Product_Help/rhsharedresource.apj node already exists.

  I found the source of the projects stored in RoboSource so after I click OK, I get the following message:

  Cannot extract all of the files needed to modernize this project.

  I noticed that this file is not in the source, so I thought that RoboHelp created so I tried to remove it, but I get the same error.

  Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.

  Thank you

  Hello

  Try to delete the affected files (rhsharedresource.apj & SearchOptions.xml) of RSO (to both the root node and the node of branch) and also your local project folder and see if that helps.

  If the problem persists, can you please provide the information for the following queries:

  1. What are the exact steps you followed everything by updating this controlled version of project for the first time?

  Like, you click Yes/No in the upgrade, most recent and the extraction dialog box?

  2. don't open your local copy or the BSR project?

  If you open this project of RSO, did open this project of the root node or the branch node?

  3. Please let us know the details of the branch properties if possible.

  Thank you

  Mona

• Cannot start new iMovie on iPad Air project

  Hi, I need to do a project for my university studies, final evaluation. I'm hoping to use iMovie on my iPad Air, as I have done so successfully in the past.

  This week, I'm in iMovie and click the symbol +. Then I click on the option to create a new project or a trailer. But when I click on one of these options, nothing happens. If I click Cancel, nothing happens and the application crashes. I have to then close and reopen the app.

  Look at a last projects is not a problem.

  Indices received with gratitude. I wonder if it's because I recently upgraded to iOs.

  iMovie has been updated for iOS 10. Make sure you have the latest version installed.

• How to transfer a project from one computer to another file

  Hello

  In order to burning a DVD on my laptop that is older, I'm trying to transfer a working from a library folder and insert it into another on the old computer. I used a USB key. All the data has been transferred, but how do i:

  1) enter a library on the old computer? I DID this, but it will not appear in the Final Cut. I "Showed the content" and it allowed me to put the file in THIS library, but it will not appear in the column "libraries."

  (2) create its OWN library on the old computer?

  Thank you.

  Mike Scully

  Stay out of the whole library. This is a complex database. If the components have moved the database becomes useless. Pretty much all you need to do inside the library can be done from the inside of the PCF.

  If you cannot move the entire library from one machine to another on an external drive, you can move a project of a new library. That will copy only the clips used in the project. You can take it on the other machine. You can also export a master file and consider on the other machine to make the DVD. It is perhaps the simplest.

• Easy way to batch processing with compressor projects?

  I have 6 events with 3 projects in each of them. Y at - it a faster way to send to compressor to open manually to the top of each project and selecting send to compressor?

  Thank you!

  Scot

  You don't have to open them. You can just select one from the collection smart projects and send to compressor.

• Can I use on my new apple project?

  I want to know if I get a new copy of MSProject can I run it on my new iMac?  Apple Help or have their own comparable program?

  You can run Windows on your Mac, then you can run the project

• Cannot export completed projects

  I use CF Pro v 10.2.3 on my iMac with El Capitan 10.11.6.

  I use the FCP for years and have not encountered this problem until recently.

  I have just completed a project 50 minutes long and have attempted to export (share) for 1080 p Apple device. He goes through the motions of export and told me that sharing has been a success, but there is no output anywhere (I searched the entire computer). The same project, I exported successfully to 720 p Apple device, and it's hidden as usual in iTunes.

  OK the 750 p is good, DVDs, but not enough good for my Media Player.

  Any ideas as to why he is out to Apple 1080 p please?

  

  The above setting must send a copy to iTunes > Home Movies and items shared in the contents of the package.

  Note: After the closure of FCP X the shared file is automatically unloaded.

  Al