4pnics networks VLAN

Similar Questions

• Advice on network VLAN using RV180W

  Hello!

  I want to create a network that allows to separate the traffic between two or three VLANS. I want to be able to connect wireless using two SSID assigned to VLAN individual. Also, I would be able to extend the zone wireless using a different Access Point. So far, I tried the best solution of equipment and I plan to buy the wireless router RV180W and WAP121 as an extension of Access Point. This configuration is possible on these devices?

  The structure of the network should look like this:

  

  The second Point of access on PORT 4 is just a future extension. It is not necessary at the beginning. I just want to know if it will be possible.

  I also link 2 PORT VLAN2 and connect it to the computer via Ethernet switch.

  Should I do VLAN2 and VLAN3 labeled with PORT3, PORT4?

  Thanks in advance!

  Hi Michal,

  In theory, that you try should work perfectly and Yes, you should make VLANS 2 and 3 tag on ports 3 and 4. Unfortunately, there is a problem with the RV180W which does not work properly with enclosed access points. I hope that this problem will be fixed in a future firmware version, but right now, I can't recommend the router for your particular scenario. Other than that issue, I have like and recommend the RV180W for general use Small Business firwewall/router. There are a few threads on this forum that describe the AP issue more in detail:

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/message/3770136#3770136

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/message/3980504#3980504

  The foregoing is not a problem with other SMB wireless routers as far as I know. I recommend that you consider the RV220W which has a better than the RV180W integrated wireless AP. It also has a more powerful processor and is very stable with the latest firmware installed. I tested a RV180W home and ended up buying the RV220W. I found that the scope of my environment was much better with the RV220W.

  Answer please if you have any questions.

  -Marty

• Design of Network\VLAN question

  I have a network completely flat and Im not a networking guy, but I have two ESX host, I need to build with a Lefthand SAN

  and I want to create a VLAN for vmotion traffic segmentation. Anyone know where I could find instructions to create the VLAN?

  I have 6 NETWORK adapters per ESX host and plan on using iSCSI software. I have also dedicated physical switches for my iSCSI traffic.

  How you prefer to use the 6-port network card?

  Awared points to answers.

  Hello

  You can assign a VLAN on each port group. VSphere Client, click on ESX / I have server you want to configure > click on the Configuration tab > then click on link networking in the hardware Section. Then click on the properties link in one of the vSwitch > select one port group, and then click on edit. Finally, you can assign a VLAN in the VLAN ID properties.

  The best way to use the NIC ports available, I think that there depends on your preferred configuration. For example, what kind of features you need to activate, the requirement for a network for each virtual computer speed, etc. But, basically, I have the same perception with the previous suggestion. You can allocate one or two ports for specific traffic.

• network; VLAN. vSwitch

  We plan to update ESX3.5 to 4.0 and I'm just wondering, how my network in the current ESX3.5 configuration to be affected. This upgrade would somehow change my network to become a vSwitch? Or my network setting would be just would remain the same if I use vCenter update manager to the ESX upgrade and then I have to somehow make this vSwitch happens?

  Thank you

  No, your switches will remain the same.  You can migrate your vSwitches to the switch distributed after the fact template if you want to.

  http://www.VMware.com/files/PDF/vSphere-vNetwork-DS-migration-configuration-WP.PDF

  If you have found this device or any other useful post please consider the use of buttons useful/correct to award points

• secure network on vlan

  Hello

  We have recently implemented VOIP company.

  Our PBX did not have the option for VOIP and was connected to our network for security reasons, because our PBX partner has access to the PBX to support reasons. After upgrade from PBX VoIP, it is connected to our network VLANs separated.

  I wonder what the best solution is to make sure that our partner has no access to the rest of our network? Only the VLANs VOIP should be accessible from their side.

  All VLANS can communicate between Via router which has configured VTP domain.

  You can place an ACL on the router. But you have an interface with an ip address for vlan 20? The router uses sous-interfaces for vlan 20?

  If so the I would

  access-list 120 permit
  access-list 120 permit
  access-list 120 permit
  access-list 120 permit
  ...
  int vlan20
  ip access-group 20 in
  

  Now if the router has just one of his ports connected to a port on the swiitch for vlan 20 and it has an ip address on this interface, and then apply the ACL on the interface instead of the vlan.

  I hope that makes sense.

  PK

• VLAN again added, problems detected on guests during the detection of new network configuration

  Hi all

  I started facing a strange problem trying to use a new VLAN configured in my vCenter environment...

  Basically, my system 'fight' to identify the new network label (VLAN) configured, leaving systems disconnected from the local network.

  This condition disappears only when I change the VM touched, assign a label of different network (VLAN), apply the changes and restart the process by configuring the new VLAN return.

  We will use an example to explain better:

  • I have a named Windows Server/Workstation VM: VM1
  • I have 2 VLANS configured in vCenter: VLAN50 and VLAN70

  VM1 is sitting on the VLAN50 and has the static IP address configured.

  I start the migration of the machine to a VLAN different, by editing the network settings of the operating system (IP, MASK, GW, DNS entries...) and replace the label of VM1 VLAN70 network.

  At this point, the machine NIC shows as if it could not connect to what in the network, although it is configured accordingly in order to communicate in the new subnet.

  I have change the VM again and change the label of a network VLAN different from VLAN70, click OK. Immediately, I change VM settings to assign in return the VLAN70.

  After that, the operating system recognizes the network successfully and starts working as expected...

  All of my virtual machines use VMXNET3 adapter and my version of vCenter is v5.5 build #2646482

  No idea what might happen?

  Concerning

  We found the problem...

  It was not associated with VMware, but a network configuration problem: (ESXi connected to two switches, one of them with the VLAN configured correctly and the other does not...).

  Thanks for the help

• In ESX VMs can choose different network/name of the label (VLAN)

  Hi guys,.

  My test vCenter crashed and I can't get it back as there is no backup. I can only connect directly to the ESXi servers and use virtual machines from there. Now, I am facing a problem while deploying a new virtual machine and by changing its network. I have a vDistributed configured switch that has 2 groups of ports 10 VLANS and VLAN 30. When I create a new virtual machine, it only let me choose VLAN 30 and will not let me choose VLAN 10 while there are a few old VMs that are still configured for VLAN 10 and I can change their card NETWORK VLAN 30. Should what changes I make to configure the VLAN 10 on my new virtual machines?

  I have 2 ESXi servers and this is the case even on the ESXi servers.

  Please find the attachment.

  Any help would be appreciated.

  Kind regards

  Hello

  The type of binding of default ports is a static binding, which means that you can connect to a virtual machine for a link static port group only through vCenter Server.

  I guess, the port VLAN 10 group is created with a static linking.

  VMware KB: Choose a type of port binding in ESX/ESXi

  If you do not group ports with ephemeral connection, you cannot connect a new VM for VDS if your vCenter is out of service.

  With connection of ephemeral ports, you can assign a virtual machine to a group of ports on ESX/ESXi and vCenter, which gives you the flexibility to manage the connections to VM through the host when vCenter is out of service.

  In this case, you will need to temporarily create a new vSwitch directly on a host with VLAN 10 to connect the new virtual machine.

  More info about ephemeral port binding:

  VMware vSphere Distributed Switch allows the management of the ephemeral ports while vCenter is offline. Vcritical

  http://www.ecloudsol.com/blog/distributed-switch-port-binding-in-VMware-vSphere-5-0/

  Vcenter with ESXi host lost and can not turn on with vDS | Virtual Me

• RVS4000 Configuration of VLAN

  I am trying to set up a couple of VLAN on the RVS4000.  The router allows me to enter the VLAN ID without problem, but it doesn't seem to be a screen to set up the network and DHCP component for the new configuration of VLAN.  I saved the configuration of the router and printed.  There are several VIRTUAL networks in the configuration with the IP addresses starting with 192.168.2.0/24 and increasing unit (192.168.3.0, 192.168.4.0, etc.).   These networks VLAN contains the DHCP configuration also.  How can I change these addresses.  Is it possible that you can not change them and take what's there and use it?   When I configured a VLAN with ID 30, is to tie the knots got an address in the 192.168.2.0 subnet, which is not what I wanted.  The manual is no help.  He said almost nothing about the configuration of VLANS.  Is there another source for more information on the configuration of the RVS4000 with VLAN?

  Also, I downloaded and installed the new firmware for the router.

  Any help is appreciated.

  Tony

  Forget it.  I thought about it.  It is on the configuration page and you will need to use the drop-down list for the VLAN configured.

• Connect 6224 VLAN routing and management VLAN

  Happy holidays all the world-

  I read several posts here and elsewhere on the inability of the 6224 to deliver its own management interface. OK, enough, I get it. But what I don't understand is a practical solution to what seems to be a huge problem if you want to use the network to connect to the device to manage (instead of the serial console port).

  Let's say I want to have three networks A, B, and C on the 6224 and configure it to route between any combination of them. Let's call them VLANS 1, 2, and 3. Three ethernet cables will connect to three ports on the 6224. for the network A, b and C. Let's just ignore shifts and redundant connections to do this.

  The management VLAN can not be assigned to one of these networks, right? He said in the documentation, and it turns out if you try to do it on the configuration of the switch. It doesn't let you do.

  So, how do you reach the 6224 for management? Create a fourth network, VLAN 4? This seems to be the general theme of the answers to questions like that, but how do you reach this seemingly isolated network? By definition, it cannot be routed. Any computer that you normally use on A, B or C, can not reach D.

  So what then? A dedicated computer for D who cannot reach the other thing than the switch management port? What about another completely separate router (I have a Cisco ASA with some ports to spare, or a hint of irony, an another 6224!) to provide a connection between D and a networks normally used? This is crazy.

  Of course, missing me something here. I can't believe that the answer is, 'If you enable routing, the management interface is essentially unusable"but that's what it looks like, from my possibly twisted point of view. I want to have my laptop computer and any other computer, sitting on a network that can be put to rout by the 6224, and for that same laptop also be able to reach this same 6224 management interface.

  Someone please help me understand this?

  Thank you

  Chris

  PS: I have an email address. It is almost unique on the entire planet. I use it to connect to this forum. But Dell, like so many others, insists on ignoring these facts and let me create an another unique identifier while playing a game of 20 questions. That's why my remarkably stupid random username.

  Thanks again, and I hope that someone gets at least a good laugh over this.

  Vlan management can be considered as a port OOB. If the intention is that it be separated from the rest of the traffic and on its own dedicated network. However, you are not limited to manage the switch through just the interface vlan management. Each VLAN with an IP address can be used by customers in this vlan to manage the switch.

  For example, if you assign a VLAN 2 address and ip 192.168.2.1. Customers in VLAN 2 with and the 192.168.2.x subnet ip address can access 192.168.2.1 to manage the switch, while being able to communicate with clients in other VLANs.

  I hope this helps some, let me know if you need help on your config, or to specify anything.

  Thank you

• Reference Dell 2824 / Ubiquiti UniFI / label Guest WIFI VLAN

  Hello

  I have a PowerConnect 2824 and two Ubiquiti UniFI APs which each is connected to a port on the 2824.

  UniFi access points create wireless networks and share among all radio configuration. These two APs publish two SSID, a protégé of personnel, another network wireless wireless network not protected for the guests. I have the ability to mark every wireless network that I want to.

  I want to use a VLAN to push traffic via the Dell switch on a DMZ port in our firewall.

  My original idea was to:

  1 tag the comments with 11 wireless network VLAN.

  2. let the unlabeled personal wireless network.

  3. set the trunks on the two ports that puts an end to the APs to allow marked and 11.

  4. Add an additional port on the 2824 11 membership only.

  5 connect the 11 only port to port my firewall DMZ.

  Here are my questions:

  1. a trunk port enable both unlabeled and package ID?

  2. If so, can I specify a port DROP packets not marked? (I want to prevent things not tagged to reach the DMZ port on the firewall).

  3 - does anyone see a flaw in my game to the top?

  Thank you

  m

  Yes, they should be able to achieve anything on the vlan 1. The personal wireless packets should come in unmarked and vlan 1 being without a label, that is where the packages will remain.

  2 comments wireless packages will come in VLAN tagged on 11 and be able to access what in the VLAN 11, g16, could probably leave g16 tagged VLAN 11 If your firewall can read tags VLAN

  Your installer should work fine. VLAN 11 only have access to the dmz on the firewall port.

• PC6224 Configuration of VLAN

  Hello

  I am desirous of VLAN my iSCSI data in two separate VLANS and think I understand what to do. I would like to just anyone for the validation test it before I go live and eventually get things horribly wrong.

  

  All i15 labeled ports must be configured as switchport access vlan 15
  All i16 labeled ports must be configured as switchport access vlan 16
  Four XG ports must be configured as vlan allowed switchport General add 15.16 tag.

  So far I think I have it but I'm not sure on how to get the traffic untagged crossing ports XG.
  It will do it automatically, or should I set switchport General pvid 1 for these ports, so all untagged traffic goes to the network vlan by default?

  I need to set the VLAN on LAG3 or will it not serious because the ports are marked? Or do I not have to label the ports if the OFFSET is the tag? Or I have to mark the two?

  Thanks for the help,

  Jim.

  Put a PVID on a LAG sets going what traffic VLAN not identified.

• Hi ALL, did any attempt on the virtual computer NETWORK load balancing using HYPERV on UCS blades

  I try to configure the CASE server cluster by using the Unicast NLB on the virtual machine on different blades on the UCS, it works for awhile, then he abandoned packages.

  I heard that this screenplay of unicast is not supported in the UCS when she used END-host mode in the fabric interconnet...? any attempted before.

  Would it, I use the multicast mode is that something needs to be done on the FBI62020 or the LAN switch upstream. ??

  Header note I found on the implementation of UCS for mulitcast NLBL:

  Microsoft NLB can be deployed in 3 modes:

  Unicast

  Multicast

  IGMP multicast

  For series B UCS deployments, we have seen that the multicast and IGMP multicast work.

  IGMP multicast mode seems to be the more reliable deployment mode.

  To do this, the monitoring settings:

  All NLB Microsoft value "Multicast IGMP" nodes.  Important!  Check ths by logging into EACH node independently.  Do not rely on the MMC of NLB snap.

  An IGMP applicant must be present on the VLAN of NLB.  If PIM is enabled on the VIRTUAL LAN that is your interrogator.  UCS cannot function as applicant IGMP.  If an interrogator of functioning is not present, NLB IGMP mode will not work.

  You must have a static ARP entry on cheating it upstream pointing IP address Unicast NLB on the multicast MAC address NETWORK load balancing.  This need will set up, of course, on the VLAN of the NLB VIP. The key is that the routing for the NLB VLAN interface must use this ARP entry as a unicast IP ARP response may not contain a multicast mac address. (Violation of the RFC 1812)  Hosts on the NLB VLAN must also use the static entry.  You may have several entries ARP.  IOS can use a function of 'alias' of ARP. (Google it.)

  How Microsoft NLB works. -The truncated for brevity Mac addresses.

  TOPOLOGY OF NLB MS

  NETWORK VLAN 10 = subnet 10.1.1.0/24 IP load balancing

  VIP = 10.1.1.10 NETWORK LOAD BALANCING

  Arp entry static switch advanced IP 10.1.1.10 upstream to MAC 01

  NLB VIP (MAC 01, IP 10.1.1.10)

  NODE-A (AA, MAC IP:10.1.1.88)

  NŒUD-B (MAC BB, IP:10.1.1.99)

  Using the IGMP snooping and interrogator VLAN snooping table is filled with the mac NLB address and groups pointing to the appropriate L2 ports.

  MS NLB nodes will send the responses of IGMP queries.

  This snooping table could take 30 to 60 seconds to complete.

  Host on VLAN 200 (10.200.1.35) sends traffic to NETWORK VIP (10.1.1.10) load balancing

  It goes of course to VLAN 10 interface that uses the static ARP entry to resolve to address MAC 01 VIP NETWORK load balancing.

  Since it is a multicast frame destination it will be forward by the IGMP snooping table.

  The framework will arrive at ALL NLB nodes. (NŒUD-A & NŒUD-B)

  NLB nodes will use its load balancing algorithm to determine which node will manage the TCP session.

  Only one NLB node will respond to this host with TCP ACK to start the session.

  NOTES

  This works in a VMware with N1k, standard vSwtich and vDS environment. Where surveillance IGMP is not enabled, the framing for VIP MAC NETWORK load balancing will be flooded.

  NLB can only work with TCP-based services.

  As stated previously mapping an IP unicast to a multicast mac address is a violation implied by RFC 1812.

  TROUBLESHOOTING

  Make sure your interrogator is working. Just to clarify that this does not mean that it is actually at work.

  Wireshark lets check that IGMP queries are received by the NLB nodes.

  Make sure that the ARP response works as expected.  Once Wireshark again is your friend.

  Look at the paintings IGMP snooping. Validate the L2 ports appearing as expected.

  CSCtx27555 [Bug-preview for CSCtx27555] Unknown multicast with destination outside the range MAC 01:xx: are deleted. (6200 FI fixed in 2.0.2m)

  IGMP mode not affected.

  CSCtx27555    Unknown multicast with destination outside the range MAC 01:xx: are deleted.

  http://Tools.Cisco.com/support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCtx27555

  fixed in 2.0(2m)

  Solution: Change the NLB mode of operation of "Multicast" to "multicast IGMP', which modifies balancing load NETWORK VIP MAC at 0100.5exx.xxx Beach, allows to transfer occur as expected.

  Q: and if I switch to switch mode, which means all of the profile and the settings on the servers are completely exhausted and I need to recreate them. ???

  A:Cisco Unified Computing System Ethernet switching Modes

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/solutions/collateral/ns340/ns517/ns224/ns944/whitepaper_c11-701962.html

  -There is no impact on the configuration, you have done service profiles.  they will continue to work as expected.  Mode selector has the FI behave more like a conventional switch.  Most notable is that Spanning tree will be activated and if you have several uplinks yew, tree covering weight will begin to block redundant paths.

  You need to review your topology and what impact tree covering weight.  Generally, we at the switch port upstream defined as "edge master", you want to delete this line.

  For pre-production and laboratory environment, PDI can help qualified with the planning, design and implementation partners.  Given to review the IDP site and open a case if you need more detailed assistance.

• Static IP address on dish network

  I want to try this because I don't have the luxury of installing a network VLAN.

  My 192.168.100.0 DEFAULT_NETWORK /255.255.255.0

  My 192.168.42.0 OTHER_NETWORK /255.255.255.0

  How do I implement this? Such a newbie question, but I rather ask the experts that the experience of my own. Saving time is gold.

  When I change my computer to the OTHER_NETWORK IP, Windows detects an address conflict IP that I thought had something to do with the ISA500. My ISA500 has default settings with the exception of the VPN settings. The OTHER_NETWORK is a network of a server and some IP phones, but it does not exist in the configuration of ISA500.

  Wonderful hardware problem.  Got to love them.  I am delighted to hear that it worked.  If you feel the answers was the right answer, you can mark it as the correct answer and who will be "close" the debate.  Otherwise, you can just leave it and it will pass finally out of the list.

• VPN on PIX in VLAN own?

  Sink us our PIX 525 s our VPN service. The PIX is currently give IP addresses to the IP VPN.

  I put this IP address range in its own VIRTUAL LAN? I can a PIX with DOT1Q trunk on the switch?

  You could put the range of client IP addresses in its own VIRTUAL LAN, but make sure you announce this route to your core network, via the static route.

  802-1-q is also supported in 525 platform:

  Virtual-based networks VLAN virtual interfaces

  Provides greater flexibility in the definition of policies of security and global integration in switched network environments supporting the resulting creation of logical interfaces of the IEEE 802 VLAN tags. 1 q and creating security policies based on these virtual interfaces

  Supports multiple virtual interfaces on a single physical interface through trunking VLAN

  Supports several trunks VLAN by Cisco PIX Security Appliance

  Supports up to 10 VLANS on Cisco PIX 525 security equipment

• RV320 Hello discovery through VLANs?

  Hello

  I have one network consisting of 2 VLANS - one for the 'main' network and the other for a network "invited" using a RV320 router configuration. I have a couple of Apple TV and a Setup program TV smart Sony on the main network VLAN. I wish that these devices to be detectable and usable on the guest VLAN. After reading different articles on Hello, it seems that it is not easy to do.

  Can anyone confirm whether or not it is possible to provide this functionality on the router RV320? Any advice would be most appreciated.

  Kind regards.

  Hello

  I'm sorry, but I'm very positive that Hello traffic will remain in the VLAN. This type of traffic is not allowed across on other VIRTUAL networks.

  I don't know there is a solution, but I do not.