506th PIX, no NAT configuration?
I'm trying to set up a PIX firewall for devices on a valid IP subnet. It is a 506e, with only two interfaces.
I can't find an example of config and I was wondering if it's because this isn't a supported configuration.
Pointers?
Thank you
Daryl
Hello
What you want to achieve, it is possible and very easy to configure. There is no restriction in terms of having no public address on your inside interface. Although you don't want to do any translation that you still may need a static command.
The minimum config you need would not be nat 0, as some may think, and it works, but only if the PIX cannot be proxy-ARP for the IPS behind the PIX. If the PIX needs proxy-ARP for these addresses, you must configure this way:
public static 111.111.111.208 (inside, outside)
111.111.111.208 mask 255.255.255.240
If you use this command and remove the
NAT (inside) 0 command it works fine also. The main difference is that, with the static command in place, the PIX not proxy-ARP for the IPS behind your PIX and how nat 0 commands it doesn´t.
In case you don't need a proxy-ARP you could do with nat 0, but then you have nat 0 on both interfaces to your PIX, so you must:
NAT (inside) 0 & nat (outside) 0
Determine if you need proxy-ARP on your border router:
Is there a route (with the correct next hop) to your edgerouter pointing to 111.111.111.208/28 or your router think it a connected?
If your router it's a directly connected subnet for some reason (this reason could be that this router is not a classless ip router) then the router wants to send packets to the MAC address and he asks an ARP. In this case the PIX must proxy-ARP.
Make proxy-ARp is no problem at all for the PIX, cause if you use my first way of configuration, as described previously, then the PIX not proxy-ARP for all addresses in the static command.
Don t know if this solves your problem, but this could very well be the case.
Alternatively, you can edit your config here (don't forget to remove the passwords first then) and we can take a look inside.
Another thing has in my opinion earlier. It could also be the case that your edgerouter has an ARP table that still contains the mappings for the IP addresses which is now behind your firewall. In this case, you need a clear ARP on your border router.
I hope this helps.
Kind regards
Leo
Tags: Cisco Security
Similar Questions
-
How can I set up the following scenario. My Pix is separate internal and external network. For outgoing, I will not allow that the associated HTTP traffic. There will be no incoming traffic. For simplicity, I use ver3 PDM to configure my 506th Pix. Should be easy to set up, I thought.
On my access rules, I allowed http and https on the inside and outside interfaces nameserver. Translation rules, I have set up NAT using a real IP on the external interface range. I have not used just in case PAT H323.
However, the configuration above does not work. I can't any http my internal network traffic. What Miss me?
Thanks for your help,
FTM
It would seem that you define the rules that indicate the source AND destination must be the same:
inside_access_in list of access permit udp any eq field any eq field
inside_access_in list access permit udp any eq ntp ntp any eq
inside_access_in list access permit udp any eq name server any eq nameserver
inside_access_in tcp allowed access list any domain eq any eq field
inside_access_in tcp allowed access list all eq www all eq www
inside_access_in list of permitted tcp access any https eq all https eq
You need change that, because the source is probably going to be 1024 or greater. Try something like this:
inside_access_in list of access permit udp any any eq field
inside_access_in list of access permit udp any any eq ntp
inside_access_in list access permit udp any any eq name server
inside_access_in list access permit tcp any any eq field
inside_access_in list access permit tcp any any eq www
inside_access_in tcp allowed access list everything all https eq
inside_access_in access to the interface inside group
Having said that allow any source ip/source port access to any IP destination as long as it is for www, dns, ssl, etc...
Your acl_web access list is not used, because it is not assigned to an interface. Remember that each interface can have only one acl.
Also, you said that you do not PAT...
Global (outside) 1 xxx.xxx.YYY.54 - xxx.xxx.YYY.55 netmask 255.255.255.0
Global 1 xxx.xxx.YYY.53 (outside)
NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0
This tells the firewall to use the range xxx.xxx.YYY.54 - xxx.xxx.YYY.55 for the assignment of an address, but when he runs, start PAT'ng with xxx.xxx.YYY.53...
hope this helps
-
PAT on PIX vs NAT overload on router
Better question practice...
It's better to perform PAT through a NAT overload on a router bastion with a static on the PIX instruction or PAT on the PIX configuration uses a global IP address?
Other alternatives?
Example of router *.
Router configuration
IP nat FirstPAT 172.16.5.100 pool 172.16.5.100 255.255.255.0
FirstPAT IP nat source list 10 overload
access-list 10 permit 10.10.10.0 0.255.255.255
PIX installation
static (inside, outside) 10.10.10.0 10.10.10.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
Example of PIX *.
Global (Outside) 1 172.16.5.100
NAT (inside) 1 0 0
Thanks in advance for all the messages!
In my opinion, there is no real compelling reasons to go with one idea on the other. Probably, I would lean towards leaving the PIX do NAT, but I could be swayed. The reason is that the PIX has essentially already been NAT (all back on the same address). But again, either should be good.
A suggestion however if you went with overloading NAT on the router would be to do it with a map of the route as opposed to the example of access list you have. Something like this:
IP nat FirstPAT 172.16.5.100 pool 172.16.5.100 255.255.255.0
IP nat source map route nat FirstPAT overload
route nat allowed 10 map
access-list 10 permit 10.10.10.0 0.255.255.255
This creates a NAT entry in the NAT table on the router.
Good luck.
Scott
-
PIX 501 NAT and PAT with a single IP address
Using the following configuration, on my first PIX 501, I am unable to provide a server of mail to the outside world and allows inside customers to browse the Internet. :
6.3 (5) PIX version
interface ethernet0 car
interface ethernet1 100full
ethernet0 nameif outside security0
nameif ethernet1 inside the security100
enable password xxxx
passwd xxx
hostname fw-sam-01
SAM domain name
fixup protocol dns-length maximum 512
fixup protocol ftp 21
fixup protocol h323 h225 1720
fixup protocol h323 ras 1718-1719
fixup protocol http 80
fixup protocol rsh 514
fixup protocol rtsp 554
fixup protocol sip 5060
fixup protocol sip udp 5060
fixup protocol 2000 skinny
No fixup not protocol smtp 25
fixup protocol sqlnet 1521
fixup protocol tftp 69
names of
outside access list permit tcp any host 62.x.x.109 eq smtp
access the inside to allow tcp a whole list
pager lines 24
Outside 1500 MTU
Within 1500 MTU
IP address outside the 62.177.x.x.x.255.248
IP address inside 192.168.45.1 255.255.255.0
alarm action IP verification of information
alarm action attack IP audit
location of PDM 192.168.45.2 255.255.255.255 inside
PDM logging 100 information
history of PDM activate
ARP timeout 14400
Global 1 interface (outside)
NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0
public static 62.177.x.x.x.45.2 (Interior, exterior) mask subnet 255.255.255.255 0 0
outside access-group in external interface
group-access to the Interior in the interface inside
Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.x.x.x.177.208.105 1
Timeout xlate 0:05:00
Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0: CPP 02:00 0:10:00 01:00 h225
H323 timeout 0:05:00 mgcp 0: sip from 05:00 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00
Sip timeout - disconnect 0:02:00 prompt Protocol sip-0: 03:00
Timeout, uauth 0:05:00 absolute
GANYMEDE + Protocol Ganymede + AAA-server
AAA-server GANYMEDE + 3 max-failed-attempts
AAA-server GANYMEDE + deadtime 10
RADIUS Protocol RADIUS AAA server
AAA-server RADIUS 3 max-failed-attempts
AAA-RADIUS deadtime 10 Server
AAA-server local LOCAL Protocol
Enable http server
http 192.168.45.0 255.255.255.0 inside
No snmp server location
No snmp Server contact
SNMP-Server Community public
No trap to activate snmp Server
enable floodguard
Telnet 192.168.45.0 255.255.255.0 inside
Telnet timeout 5
SSH timeout 5
Console timeout 0
dhcpd lease 3600
dhcpd ping_timeout 750
: end
It is I'am using access list and groups wrong or am I wrong in PAT/NAT configuration.
Please advise...
Hello
I went through the ongoing discussion. The pix configuration should be fine for now according to suggestions. The problems seems to be on the server. If it is a new installation of windows, then there is an option not to accept requests that are not local network.
If you want to check if pix allows connections and then when you telnet to port 25 of the outside, just run the xlates control.
SH xlate and it should show you a translation for the inside host. More than a quick test if pix allows traffic is to check 'sho-outdoor access list' and see if the counters are increasing.
Hopefully this should help you.
Arun S.
-
Intercommunication 506th PIX VPN to VPN windows server
Most of he says title.
I got a 831, and I only needed to port before the pptp tcp port 1723 to my Windows 2003 VPN server.
Got 506th pix until 2 days ago and I cannot find a way to pass traffic. Obviously tcp 1723 is mapped statically. And I checked this command for accuracy.
Configuration mode, enter the following command:
fixup protocol pptp 1723
-
I have a 506th pix that I couldn't connect this morning. I had a user restart it for me while I did a ping t on this subject, the ping of the ip address of the element has disappeared, and the ip address of the proxy server now rises. What would cause this
pings from the hosts or routers to the PIX firewall interfaces fail, check the debugging messages, which must be displayed on the console. Ping successful debugging messages appear as in this example.
ICMP echo reply (len 32 id seq 1 256) 209.165.201.1 > 209.165.201.2
Application of echo ICMP (len 32 id 1 seq 512) 209.165.201.2 > 209.165.201.1
Statements of the request and the answer should appear, which shows that the PIX Firewall and the host responded. If none of these messages appeared while ping interfaces, then there is a routing problem between the host or router and the PIX firewall that caused ping (ICMP) packets to never get to the PIX firewall.
-
I have a problem with my 506th Pix: I can not connect by telnet session. Y at - it an option to reactivate PDM?
Thks
Yes, there is a way to access Telnet via - PDM
Cofniguration-> system-> Administration properties-> Telnet
Here you can add the host IPs you can telnet and specify the interface where these customers.
Note: You cannot telnet to the outside interface security PIX firewall / low level.
Kind regards
Maryse.
-
Java problem when you access 506th PIX
I get an error message when I try to access my 506th PIX from in the firewall using IE. After the first password, I get the error message "exception: java.security.AccessControlException: access denied (java.utilProperty Permission java.versionread) at the bottom of the page IE.» Any ideas?
Hi Burns I had the same problem, you need to do is to go to www.java.com and download the java applet and try and access the PIX will work without problem
-
Hi all
I have a small question. I have a couple of users who use routers to connect by VPN to our pix that authenticates by a RAY for L2TP connections. I enabled the NAT - T on our PIX and they may not always connect. Is there anything I might have missed. I checked most of the posts in this forum do not see anything else, I should have activated.
Can anyone help?
Thanks in advance.
Michael
A tunnel of Lan-to-Lan of a router in a PIX does not NAT - T, unless there is NAT devices between two end points. If this is the case, you must ensure that both the software both from the end of rehbeh points devices support this capability. An example of a router to tunnel PIX IPSec configuration is available at http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a0080094498.shtml
Another example that deals with the same configuration with NAT is available at
http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080094a87.shtml
-
PIX SMTP NAT or Port based NAT?
I have what may seem like a strange question...
I have a client with a PIX and a SMTP server inside their network. They were using a NAT Port basis via the following command (all IP addresses are changed to protect the innocent):
static (inside, outside) 1.1.1.1 tcp smtp 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.255 smtp
It worked well for incoming and outgoing email except to go to particular mail servers. What was going on, it was that they were receiving messages from rebound as below:
Where IP address 1.1.1.2 combined with overall command of the client.
Once I changed the nat to use a normal NAT rather than on a port a whole worked well. Download
static (inside, outside) 1.1.1.1 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.255
My question is can I do nat based on the port works for IP addressing in the two directions or am I stuck with the help of a single IP NAT?
I guess what is happening, is that the NAT based on the port looks only to conversations from the incoming direction (ie the conversation is with port 25 on 192.168.0.1), no conversations from the outgoing direction (ie the conversation is with port 25 on an external IP address).
Rgds,
Peter
Excellent analysis and you are immediately. Just a simple set-config that lack of most people. Try the following:
static (inside, outside) 1.1.1.1 tcp smtp 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.255 smtp
Global 2 1.1.1.1 (outside)
NAT (inside) 2 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.255
The static method will match the traffic from port 25 to the mail server. So when your mail server sends outgoing traffic on one port other that the 25, he uses the nat/global configuration you have defined for the other hosts on the inside interface. Who obviously doesn't like the other e-mail server.
Hope that's clear, but if not, let me know.
Scott
-
Help with customer 501 pix for the configuration of a site...
Hello everyone, I am trying to set up a customer vpn site and after a few days
I'm at the end of the roll.
I'd appreciate ANY help or trick here.
I tried to set up the config via CLI and PDM, all to nothing does not.
Although the VPN client log shows the invalid password, I am convinced that the groupname password is correct.
I use the Cisco VPN Client 5.0.07.0290 v.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Here is HS worm of the PIX:
Cisco PIX Firewall Version 6.3 (5)
Cisco PIX Device Manager Version 3.0 (4)-----------------------------------------------------------------
Here's my sh run w / passwords removed:
pixfirewall # sh run
: Saved
:
6.3 (5) PIX version
interface ethernet0 10baset
interface ethernet1 100full
ethernet0 nameif outside security0
nameif ethernet1 inside the security100
activate the encrypted password to something
that something encrypted passwd
pixfirewall hostname
domain ciscopix.com
fixup protocol dns-length maximum 512
fixup protocol ftp 21
fixup protocol h323 h225 1720
fixup protocol h323 ras 1718-1719
fixup protocol http 80
fixup protocol they 389
fixup protocol rsh 514
fixup protocol rtsp 554
fixup protocol sip 5060
fixup protocol sip udp 5060
fixup protocol 2000 skinny
fixup protocol smtp 25
fixup protocol sqlnet 1521
fixup protocol tftp 69
names of
access-list ping_acl allow icmp a whole
permit 192.168.1.0 ip access list inside_outbound_nat0_acl 255.255.255.0 192.168
. 50.48 255.255.255.248
outside_cryptomap_dyn_20 ip access list allow any 192.168.50.48 255.255.255.248pager lines 24
Outside 1500 MTU
Within 1500 MTU
IP address outside pppoe setroute
IP address inside 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
alarm action IP verification of information
alarm action attack IP audit
IP local pool vpnpool 192.168.50.50 - 192.168.50.55
history of PDM activate
ARP timeout 14400
Global interface 10 (external)
NAT (inside) 0-list of access inside_outbound_nat0_acl
NAT (inside) 10 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0
Access-group ping_acl in interface outside
Timeout xlate 03:00
Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0: CPP 02:00 0:10:00 01:00 h225
H323 timeout 0:05:00 mgcp 0: sip from 05:00 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00
Sip timeout - disconnect 0:02:00 prompt Protocol sip-0: 03:00
Timeout, uauth 0:05:00 absolute
GANYMEDE + Protocol Ganymede + AAA-server
AAA-server GANYMEDE + 3 max-failed-attempts
AAA-server GANYMEDE + deadtime 10
RADIUS Protocol RADIUS AAA server
AAA-server RADIUS 3 max-failed-attempts
AAA-RADIUS deadtime 10 Server
AAA-server local LOCAL Protocol
Enable http server
http 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 inside
No snmp server location
No snmp Server contact
SNMP-Server Community public
No trap to activate snmp Server
enable floodguard
Permitted connection ipsec sysopt
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5-esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
Dynamic crypto map outside_dyn_map 20 match address outside_cryptomap_dyn_20
Crypto-map dynamic outside_dyn_map 20 the transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5 value
map outside_map 65535-isakmp ipsec crypto dynamic outside_dyn_map
outside_map interface card crypto outside
ISAKMP allows outside
part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 20
ISAKMP policy 20 3des encryption
ISAKMP policy 20 md5 hash
20 2 ISAKMP policy group
ISAKMP duration strategy of life 20 86400
vpngroup address vpnpool pool vpnaccessgroup
vpngroup dns 192.168.1.1 Server vpnaccessgroup 192.168.1.11
vpngroup wins 192.168.1.1 vpnaccessgroup-Server
vpngroup vpnaccessgroup by default-field local.com
vpngroup idle 1800 vpnaccessgroup-time
something vpnaccessgroup vpngroup password
Telnet 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 inside
Telnet timeout 60
SSH 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 inside
SSH timeout 5
Console timeout 0
VPDN group pppoe_group request dialout pppoe
VPDN group pppoe_group localname someone
VPDN group ppp authentication pap pppoe_group
VPDN username someone something
dhcpd address 192.168.1.100 - 192.168.1.110 inside
dhcpd dns 206.248.154.22 206.248.154.170
dhcpd lease 3600
dhcpd ping_timeout 750
dhcpd outside auto_config
dhcpd allow inside
Terminal width 80
Cryptochecksum:307fab2d0e3c5a82cebf9c76b9d7952a
: end-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here is the log of pix in trying to connect with the client vpn cisco w / real IPs removed:
crypto_isakmp_process_block:src: [cisco vpn client IP here], dest: [cisco PIX IP here] spt:64897 TPD:
500
Exchange OAK_AG
ISAKMP (0): treatment ITS payload. Message ID = 0ISAKMP (0): audit ISAKMP transform 1 against 20 priority policy
ISAKMP: encryption AES - CBC
ISAKMP: hash SHA
ISAKMP: default group 2
ISAKMP: long-acting prior auth (init)
ISAKMP: type of life in seconds
ISAKMP: lifespan (IPV) 0x0 0 x 20 0xc4 0x9b
ISAKMP: keylength 256
ISAKMP (0): atts are not acceptable. Next payload is 3
ISAKMP (0): audit ISAKMP transform 2 against priority policy 20
ISAKMP: encryption AES - CBC
ISAKMP: MD5 hash
ISAKMP: default group 2
ISAKMP: long-acting prior auth (init)
ISAKMP: type of life in seconds
ISAKMP: lifespan (IPV) 0x0 0 x 20 0xc4 0x9b
ISAKMP: keylength 256
ISAKMP (0): atts are not acceptable. Next payload is 3
ISAKMP (0): audit ISAKMP transform 3 against priority policy 20
ISAKMP: encryption AES - CBC
ISAKMP: hash SHA
ISAKMP: default group 2
ISAKMP: preshared auth
ISAKMP: type of life in seconds
ISAKMP: lifespan (IPV) 0x0 0 x 20 0xc4 0x9b
ISAKMP: keylength 256
ISAKMP (0): atts are not acceptable. Next payload is 3
ISAKMP (0): audit ISAKMP transform 4 against 20 priority policy
ISAKMP: encryption AES - CBC
ISAKMP: MD5 hash
ISAKMP: default group 2
ISAKMP: preshared auth
ISAKMP: type of life in seconds
ISAKMP: lifespan (IPV) 0x0 0 x 20 0xc4 0x9b
ISAKMP: keylength 256
ISAKMP (0): atts are not acceptable. Next payload is 3
ISAKMP (0): audit ISAKMP transform 5 against priority policy 20
ISAKMP: encryption AES - CBC
ISAKMP: hash SHA
ISAKMP: default group 2
ISAKMP: long-acting prior auth (init)
ISAKMP: type of life in seconds
ISAKMP: lifespan (IPV) 0x0 0 x 20 0xc4 0x9b
ISAKMP: keylength 128
ISAKMP (0): atts are not acceptable. Next payload is 3
ISAKMP (0): audit ISAKMP transform against the policy of priority 20 6
ISAKMP: encryption AES - CBC
ISAKMP: MD5 hash
ISAKMP: default group 2
ISAKMP: long-acting prior auth (init)
ISAKMP: type of life in seconds
ISAKMP: lifespan (IPV) 0x0 0 x 20 0xc4 0x9b
ISAKMP: keylength 128
ISAKMP (0): atts are not acceptable. Next payload is 3
ISAKMP (0): audit ISAKMP transform against the policy of priority 20 7
ISAKMP: encryption AES - CBC
ISAKMP: hash SHA
ISAKMP: default group 2
ISAKMP: preshared auth
ISAKMP: type of life in seconds
ISAKMP: lifespan (IPV) 0x0 0 x 20 0xc4 0x9b
ISAKMP: keylength 128
ISAKMP (0): atts are not acceptable. Next payload is 3
ISAKMP (0): audit ISAKMP transform 8 against priority policy 20
ISAKMP: encryption AES - CBC
ISAKMP: MD5 hash
ISAKMP: default group 2
ISAKMP: preshared auth
ISAKMP: type of life in seconds
ISAKMP: lifespan (IPV) 0x0 0 x 20 0xc4 0x9b
ISAKMP: keylength 128
ISAKMP (0): atts are not acceptable. Next payload is 3
ISAKMP (0): audit ISAKMP transform 9 against priority policy 20
ISAKMP: 3DES-CBC encryption
ISAKMP: hash SHA
ISAKMP: default group 2
ISAKMP: long-acting prior auth (init)
ISAKMP: type of life in seconds
ISAKMP: lifespan (IPV) 0x0 0 x 20 0xc4 0x9b
ISAKMP (0): atts are not acceptable.
crypto_isakmp_process_block:src:src: [cisco vpn client IP here], dest: [cisco pix IP here] spt:64897 TPD:
500
ISAKMP: error msg not encrypted
crypto_isakmp_process_block:src: [cisco vpn client IP here], dest: [cisco pix IP here] spt:64897 TPD:
500
ISAKMP: error msg not encrypted
pixfirewall #.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here is the log of the vpn client:
363 16:07:58.953 01/07/10 Sev = Info/4 CM / 0 x 63100002
Start the login process364 16:07:58.953 01/07/10 Sev = Info/4 CM / 0 x 63100004
Establish a secure connection365 16:07:58.953 01/07/10 Sev = Info/4 CM / 0 x 63100024
Attempt to connect with the server '[cisco pix IP here]. "366 16:07:58.953 01/07/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000001
From IKE Phase 1 negotiation367 16:07:58.969 01/07/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000013
SEND to > ISAKMP OAK AG (SA, KE, NO, ID, VID (Xauth), VID (dpd), VID (Frag), VID(Nat-T), VID (Unity)) [cisco pix IP here]368 16:07:59.078 01/07/10 Sev = Info/4 IPSEC / 0 x 63700008
IPSec driver started successfully369 07/01/10 Sev 16:07:59.078 = Info/4 IPSEC / 0 x 63700014
Remove all keys370 16:08:00.110 01/07/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000014
RECEIVING< isakmp="" oak="" ag="" (sa,="" vid(xauth),="" vid(dpd),="" vid(unity),="" vid(?),="" ke,="" id,="" non,="" hash)="" from="" [cisco="" pix="" ip="">371 16:08:00.110 01/07/10 Sev = WARNING/3 IKE/0xE3000057
The HASH payload received cannot be verified372 16:08:00.110 01/07/10 Sev = WARNING/2 IKE/0xE300007E
Failed the hash check... may be configured with password invalid group.373 16:08:00.110 01/07/10 Sev = WARNING/2 IKE/0xE300009B
Impossible to authenticate peers (Navigator: 915)374 16:08:00.110 01/07/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000013
SEND to > ISAKMP OAK INFO (NOTIFY: INVALID_HASH_INFO) [cisco pix IP here]375 16:08:00.110 01/07/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000013
SEND to > ISAKMP OAK INFO (NOTIFY: AUTH_FAILED) [cisco pix IP here]376 16:08:00.110 01/07/10 Sev = WARNING/2 IKE/0xE30000A7
SW unexpected error during the processing of negotiator aggressive Mode:(Navigator:2263)377 16:08:00.110 01/07/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000017
Marking of IKE SA delete (I_Cookie = A152D516B07D9659 R_Cookie = 5F4B55C38C0A40F4) reason = DEL_REASON_IKE_NEG_FAILED378 16:08:01.078 01/07/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE/0x6300004B
IKE negotiation to throw HIS (I_Cookie = A152D516B07D9659 R_Cookie = 5F4B55C38C0A40F4) reason = DEL_REASON_IKE_NEG_FAILED379 16:08:01.078 01/07/10 Sev = Info/4 CM / 0 x 63100014
Could not establish the Phase 1 SA with the server "[cisco pix IP here]" due to the "DEL_REASON_IKE_NEG_FAILED".380 16:08:01.078 01/07/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000001
Signal received IKE to complete the VPN connection381 16:08:01.078 01/07/10 Sev = Info/4 IPSEC / 0 x 63700014
Remove all keys382 16:08:01.078 01/07/10 Sev = Info/4 IPSEC / 0 x 63700014
Remove all keys383 16:08:01.078 01/07/10 Sev = Info/4 IPSEC / 0 x 63700014
Remove all keys384 16:08:01.078 01/07/10 Sev = Info/4 IPSEC/0x6370000A
IPSec driver successfully stoppedMmmm... What version of vpn client do you use?
If you use the last being, it looks like you might have it downgrade to a version older than the version of your PIX is old enough.
-
My PIX configuration has two world and two nat settings.
Global (outside) 1 65.209.4.220 - 65.209.4.253 255.255.255.192 subnet mask
Global (1 65.209.4.254 255.255.255.192 subnet mask outside)
NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0
NAT (intf2) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0
I can understand the two commands of nat, more or less, but I can't understand why the two global commands and what they do. Can someone clarify the situation?
Jim
609-896-2404 x 1279
Oh I should have read your question more carefully. The 1st World allocates addresses for guests inside and intf2.
Once the pool is not the address, then it will use the 2nd global and it will now start making Polo and non-originating, as was the case in the 1st world.
So, indeed, until all the addresses in the global pool are exhausted, all of these hosts will be coordinated. After that, the new hosts come out will be PATed with the adresse.254.
Hope it clears.
Thank you
Christophe
-
506th PIX and VPN client - multiple connections connections
I have a PIX of the 506th (6.2) w/3DES license and 3.6.3 VPN client software. I'm only using group user name and password to authenticate. The first user login works fine. When the second user connects, the first is finished and the second works very well. The product turned on States I should be able to have 25 simultaneous connections or site to site or customer.
Any help will be greatly appreciated, Kyle
Are these two users on the same site, behind a device that makes PAT? If so, then this device is causing the problem, not the PIX. The device is unable to correctly translate the IPsec packets. Unfortunately nothing you can do about it on the PIX, although the next version of the software (6.3 to your calendar of March) will have NAT - T support (which the client currently supports). Once that support NAT - T both ends, they'll be able to say that there's a PAT instrument between the two and they will automatically encapsulate everything in the UDP packets, which your PAT instrument will be able to translate correctly.
-
506th PIX IPSEC VPN allow authentication for local users?
We have a 6.3 (5) running PIX 506th, configured for Cisco's VPN IPSEC clients. Cisco VPN clients authenticate with the credentials of group fine, but is it possible to use local users to authenicate plu? We use local users to our existing PPTP VPN clients, but we want to migrate these users to IPSEC. Any info would be greatly appreicated.
Of course, you can... you need to include the command on your card crypto below
map LOCAL crypto client authentication
I hope this helps... Please, write it down if she does!
-
Have a 501 for a client configuration. All works well for a few minutes and they the PC can't get out the firewall. Looks like the NAT works very well but the PAT do not hit.
This part of the config, I received an example of cisco.
Can someone help me?
Thank you
Fred
With less than 25 PCs behind the PIX you won't have to worry about memory problems. You will have to look for good of licensing issues. The default 501 supoprts 10 users license and can be upgraded to support 50 users - still no need to worry about memory.
Regarding the counters on the PIX, I usually recommend to leave all timers with settings by default unless you are having problems and TAC allows you to change them.
-Mark
Maybe you are looking for
-
Hi, I have a HP 840 G1, Windows 7 Pro 64 bit. I just updated the display driver adapter to the last list on the HP website, Version: 10.18.10.3993 this may have fixed a problem where the "sleep mode" would be empty only the screen, not to put the co
-
Can I remove the Secure Access software?
Hello I just bought a bunch of GM 16 flash drives Ultra to unload all photos that are all over my hard drive. I don't need to password protect my photos, just space max to store. Can I get rid of the software that came on every flash drive without
-
printer driver for Lexmark X 5150
I installed the printer driver for Lexmark X 5150 in the new Gateway PC and trying to instiall the printer, I click on select & it goes right down to a lower level in the Lexmark program & never settles. I have installed the printer driver for Lexmar
-
"authentication control-direction in" CLOSED authentication mode
Switch: 4510R-E, running a DEV version 3.6.0-based ISE: 1.2.0.899 patch 7 Hi, I worked on a weird issue where some of my clients would pass through their IP address and the only way I could get it back was to spend their open port in authentication m
-
Hi, I'm trying to delete a file and check it in a separate folder using a windows command in a data load Maxl script. I have a script windows in place, but it will just overwrite the file to archive. . How can I check in files without overwriting the