A lot of UDP on Internet traffic, why?

Similar Questions

• How to apply internet traffic in VPN tunnel users

  Hello

  Perhaps it is a simple matter to most of you, but it confuses me right now.

  Here's my situation:

  home - internet - ASA 5510 users - CORP LAN

  We have remote Ipsec VPN and anyconnect VPN, I think that the solution must work on two of them.

  My question is: "how to apply internet traffic user home to the VPN tunnel?

  We have "split tunnel" to only"'interesting traffic' VPN tunnel access LAN CORP.

  but now I need apply all traffic (internet + CORP LAN) user through VPN tunnel passes.

  so far, I did what I know:

  1. remove the "split tunnle" group policy

  2. the address in "remote user VPN address pool" are perhaps NAT/PAT travers ASA5510

  but I don't get why it doesn't work.

  all suggestions are appreciate!

  Thank you!

  A few things to configure:

  (1) Split tunnel policy to be passed under split in tunnelall tunnel

  (2) configure NAT on the external interface to PAT to the same global address.

  (3) configure "allowed same-security-traffic intra-interface" so that the tunnel VPN for Internet traffic can make a u-turn.

  Please share the current configuration if the foregoing still does not solve the problem. Thank you.

• Site to site VPN, I need all internet traffic to exit the site.

  I have 2 sites connected via a pair of SRX5308

  A = 192.168.1.0/24

  IP WAN = 1.1.1.1

  B = 192.168.2.0/24

  IP WAN = 2.2.2.2

  Now what I need to do, is to have all traffic from B to go to the site one even traffic destined to the internet. That is, I need internet traffic out of our network with the IP 1.1.1.1, even if it is from the network B.

  On my I have set up a route 1.1.1.1 of the ISP, then a value by default 0/0 to 192.168.1.1 it ASA knows how to get to the peer VPN is a more specific route, but sends everything above the tunnel, at the remote end which then hairpin of ASA routes internet outside its own WAN port traffic.

  I can understand though not how to so the same thing on the pair of SRX5308 they either don't raise the tunnel or internet route to the local site address B.

  Anyone have any ideas?

  I need to do this because we are logging and monitoring of internet traffic to A site via tapping from upstream to various IDS solutions and will not (cannot) reproduce this to all our remote sites.

  Thank you

  Dave.

  After some more thought and testing I came up with a workable solution to my own problem. I'll share it here in case it can help others.

  (1) use the wizard at both ends to implement a normal VPN that connects the two segments of network 192.168.1.0 and 192.168.2.0

  (2) go to site VPN - VPN policy remote router192.168.2.1 and click Edit

  (a) disable Netbios

  (b) select "None" from the drop-down list the remote IP address.

  (c) to apply the change

  3) go to the VPN-> VPN policy on the head end site (192.168.1.1) and click Edit

  (a) disable Netbios

  (b) select "None" from the drop-down list the local IP address

  (c) to apply the change

  Now all the traffic wil go down the VPN tunnel and exit to the internet on the site of head end. Hope this helps others with the same question.

• Whenever the phone rings my internet cut why?

  Whenever the phone rings my internet cut why?

  Hello

  What operating system do you use?

  You will need to go into your options of modems and to disable call waiting.  To do this, your modem will dial a specific code before dialing your ISP.  There are some common codes in the drop-down list that you can try.  If none of them does not work, you will need to contact your phone company and ask them the code.  You will then need to manually enter the code before the number you are calling your Internet service provider.  We have listed the steps below for setting this up and have also provided a link to a Microsoft Help article on dial-up connections.  The information you are looking for is in the article: general tab

  Disable call waiting:

  ·         Click the Start button, and then click Control Panel

  Click hardware and soundand then click on Options of modems and.

  ·  Place a check next to the to disable call waiting, dial: option on the general tab, and then select * 70 , 1170 , or # 70 in the drop-down list, or type in the sequence number which requires that telephone service to disable call waiting.

  · Click OK to accept the call waiting news.

  · Click OK to close the modems Options window and

  Options of modems and: setting up dialing locations

  http://windowshelp.Microsoft.com/Windows/en-us/help/2e2fdbec-4359-4e70-B580-608a447af9e91033.mspx#EAB

  This should prevent you from disconnection to the internet of an incoming call.

• Monitor internet traffic for each user in windows 7

  In a stand alone system (a customer) with multiple user accounts, how can I monitor / limit internet traffic data?

  Please enter a software

  Hi Nima,

  Thanks for posting your query on the Microsoft Community.

  According to the description, I understand that you want to monitor internet traffic data.

  I suggest you to refer to the suggestions of Shekhar S replied on 12 January 2011 and check if that helps.

  http://answers.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/Forum/Windows_7-Networking/Monitor-Internet-traffic-on-Windows-7/25dbc14f-8190-46b6-b1fe-3b8f0cd550cd

  Hope this information helps. Please let us know the results. We will be happy to help you further.

• Route Internet traffic against the default VPN on SAA route

  I want to transfer all internet traffic to a VPN connection via the internal network and not divided the digging of tunnels or direct connection to the internet from the OUTSIDE interface.

  I have a VPN connection default gateway, so all traffic is pushed back on the OUTSIDE interface when the VPN is in place and the user connects to the Internet.

  Is it possible to send Internet traffic to the INSIDE interface, internal network, to route to the Internet.

  I'm not looking for another solution, it's the design, I would like to implement.

  

  As always, any help is greatly appreciated.

  Of course you can, simply set the following text:

  Route inside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 in tunnel

  The foregoing will force all VPN traffic after be decrypted to the next break of the SAA within the interface defined above

• RV180 VPN route all internet traffic via IPSec VPN

  Hello

  I install my RV180 to VPN to our headquarters Fortigate 60 C. It works really well

  My only problem is that I don't know how to move internet traffic on our remote site by Headquarters. We want to use this technique so that all sites have the same web content filtering provided by our main Fortigate unit. I see clearly that all traffic destined to our internal network will go trough the VPN tunnel, but internet traffic will go through our modem at the remote site.

  My way of fortigate thinking said that I need a static route to transfer all traffic through the VPN tunnel. I've read elsewhere that I need to set up some sort of ACL.

  Anyone else has any ideas on this / has anyone successfully implemented somehting similar?

  Hi Jared,

  I don't think that RV180 takes complete care of tunneling. Complete tunneling allows you to all your traffic to VPN. RV180 made only split tunneling.

  Thank you

  Vijay

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPad App

• RV 320 won't internet traffic through the SMC modems

  We have recently installed a RV320 to use primarily as a gateway for FTP traffic. The router is installed power 2 60/10 circuits of our Internet service provider who provided 2 edge of the MSC devices and which have Wifi capabilities and router. When connect on modems in factory default state the RV320 connects but does not take advantage of the double connections in terms of speed. When disable us the wifi modems and router running the RV 320 connects but do not traffic through to the modems.

  Since the two modems are identical, we get the same news IP and gateway of each. I would prefer not to have the modem in router mode. Is there a setting on the RV that will connect and pass internet traffic with modems in mode 'dumbed down '.

  Graham Saywell

  Wanted to sound and image

  Toronto

  Hi Graham,

  The best scenario is to have both SMC routers on bridge mode and configure both on RV320 WAN interface with (PPPE, static IP, DHCP... He expense of your WAN connection)

  Can you please share with us what kind of WAN connection you use in the SMC routers?

  -Ensure the RV320 you have the latest firmware 1.1.0.09, otherwise you can download it from this link:

  http://software.Cisco.com/download/release.html?mdfid=284005929&softwareid=282465789&release=1.1.0.09&relind=available&rellifecycle=&RelType=latest

  -On RV320 under the management of the system--> Dual WAN and check Load Balance

  -After that, you set up the RV320 with the same type of WAN connection as a router SMC and SMC router mode Bridge and in this case, you should see the two public IP on RV320 of audit system summary

  If you do these steps and still you can not the public IP address RV320 and the SMC router in Bridge mode, please share with us the configuration file RV320 and screenshots of two CMS about the WAN configuration

  If in the case the SMC router does not have the option of working in Bridge mode, in this case, you will need to have the local of the SCM with subnet different e.g. 192.168.1.1/24 and other a 192.168.2.1/24

  on RV320 you can leave the configuration in DHCP on both WAN Ondaaah (if you have the DHCP Server enable SMC router) or you can configure the static IP address on the two wan

  * Please answer question mark or note the fact other users can benefit from the TI *.

  Thank you

  Mehdi

• Windows Media Center tells me that I have sm not connected to the internet, but I'm out of windows media center I can access the internet. Why?

  Windows Media Center tells me that I have sm not connected to the internet, but I'm out of windows media center I can access the internet. Why?

  Disable the firewall and check the connectivity in media center.

• Hello, I bought the download of Lr 5 6 Lr, and I want to validate the serienumber. But Adobe is still asking to connect to internet. Why, I'm connected. Please help ;-)

  Hello, I bought the download of Lr 5 6 Lr, and I want to validate the serienumber. But Adobe is still asking to connect to internet. Why, I'm connected. Please help ;-)

  Refer to this:

  Solutions to connection errors, activation and connection with creative Cloud applications and Creative Suite

  Mylenium

• 32.0 Firefox increases my internet traffic

  My internet subscription offer me a 1.5 GB per month
  This quota was enough for daily browsing of my facebook account, but also a few news sites.

  I used FF29 on Windows XP.
  After the passage of FF29 to FF32, this contingent became insufficient.
  Also, the very delayed in browsing facebook.

  I downloaded GoogleChrome and found that it saves my quota again.

  It seems that FF32.0 downloads more bytes per page while navigating on facebook.

  Best regards.

  I have my bandwidth back.

  The problem has been resolved by increasing the size of cash.

  I had reduced the size of the disk cache to zero, in order to reduce access to the hard drive.
  After a few months, I found that Firefox consumes a lot of my band bandwidth downloading lots of data.
  Recently, I found that the reduction in the size of the cache was the reason.

  Now, I have redirected the folder cache to a RAM_Disk and limit the size of the cache of 64 MB. Record the access to the hard drive, which reduces the amount of downloaded data and makes internet more fast.

  Best regards

• Navigation for the AVG firewall Windows XP - network sharing and occasionally be blocked due to uknown UDP outgoing local traffic remotely different ports... Repeatedly enters FilterDevice in the firewall log

  Various involved Ports:
  Local: 257 remotely: 513
  Local: 513 remotely: 6146
  I also saw port 259 and a few others...
  The firewall settings work for various other users, but seem to don't like is not something in my configuration.

  As a member of a domain running Windows XP Pro SP3
  When it blocks the traffic, they are always directed to a remote IP address of a domain within my local network controller. I uninstalled a lot of applications, and made sure I have no services for unix/linux installed.  For a bit, I thought he may have something for security certificates because my computer and user accounts are configured with our local CA... I doubt, however, that is related...

  I also know that my domain name is not the configuration as tight as we would like to see because we had to reduce some of the security settings for old Windows 98 and AS / 400 systems.  So I remember an old key "reg" which might not help:
  Location: HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\lanmanworkstation
  \Parameters
  Key: enablesecuritysignature
  Initial value: 0
  New value: 1
  This changed seemed to help but then after another it reboot started appearing again...

  Amaranth Hello,

  Thank you for visiting the website of Microsoft Windows Vista Community. The question you have posted is related to the area and would be better suited to the TechNet Forums community. Please visit the link below to find a community that will provide the support you want.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/categories/

  Keith
  Microsoft Answers Support Engineer
  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think

• Why back ' ent windows media player 11. have a best converter.it seems converters are free on the internet.so why hasent my Media Player installed to help users

  • tried to download a movie of you tube.after download tried to look on my media player error came unable to read this ext.so file I downloaded a you tube converter that makes for me.so why if it's this easy .that a converter is not installed in windows media player 11. Why are you so behind the windows vista .ultimate times.i ask around and everyone says the same windows are so far here behind.come in wake up. Sorry this topic but some body has to say to all my downloads I can't watch because .windows media player11 isn't it.we as clients must, for our money, have good products that we can trust.you must have been said this before.please address the issue of you.practilly .for all info.useful you.

  • tried to download a movie of you tube.after download tried to look on my media player error came unable to read this ext.so file I downloaded a you tube converter that makes for me.so why if it's this easy .that a converter is not installed in windows media player 11. Why are you so behind the windows vista .ultimate times.i ask around and everyone says the same windows are so far here behind.come in wake up. Sorry this topic but some body has to say to all my downloads I can't watch because .windows media player11 isn't it.we as clients must, for our money, have good products that we can trust.you must have been said this before.please address the issue of you.practilly .for all info.useful you.

  If you want a free Converter, go on the internet and type freeaudioconverter.ink and you'll get a program which is freeware. No test and you don't have to buy anything. I hope this helps you. It is a very easy to use program. Good luck. :)

• NAT VPN tunnel and still access Internet traffic

  Hello

  Thank you in advance for any help you can provide.

  I have a server with the IP 192.168.1.9 that needs to access a subnet remote from 192.168.50.0/24, through the Internet.  However, before the server can access the remote subnet, the server IP must be NAT'ed to 10.1.0.1 because the VPN gateway remote (which is not under my control) allows access to other customers who have the same subnet address that we do on our local network.

  We have a 2801 Cisco (running c2801-advsecurityk9 - mz.124 - 15.T9.bin) set up to make the NAT.  It is the only gateway on our network.

  I have configured the Cisco 2801 with the following statements of NAT and the relevant access lists:

  access-list 106 allow host ip 192.168.1.9 192.168.50.0 0.0.0.255

  NAT extended IP access list
  refuse the host ip 192.168.1.9 192.168.50.0 0.0.0.255
  deny ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255
  ip permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any

  route allowed ISP 10 map
  corresponds to the IP NAT

  IP nat EMDVPN 10.1.0.1 pool 10.1.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0
  IP nat inside source list 106 pool EMDVPN
  IP nat inside source map route ISP interface FastEthernet0/1 overload

  When the server (192.168.1.9) attempts to ping on the subnet of 192.168.50.0/24 devices, the VPN tunnel is established successfully.  However, after that, the server is no longer able to access the Internet because the NAT translation for 192.168.1.9 has changed since the external IP address of the router (FastEthernet0/1) at 10.1.0.1.

  The documentation I've seen on the site of Cisco says that this type of Setup allows only host subnet communication.  Internet access is not possible.  However, maybe I missed something, or one of you experts can help me.  Is it possible to configure the NAT router traffic destined to the VPN tunnel and still access the Internet by using the dynamic NAT on FastEthernet0/1?

  Once again, thank you for any help you can give.

  Alex

  Hello

  Rather than use a pool for NAT

  192.168.1.9 - 10.1.0.1 > 192.168.50.x

  ACL 102 permit ip 192.168.1.9 host 192.168.50.0 0.0.0.255

  RM-STATIC-NAT route map permit 10
  corresponds to the IP 102

  IP nat inside source static 192.168.1.9 10.1.0.1 card expandable RM-STATIC-NAT route

  ACL 101 deny host ip 192.168.1.9 192.168.50.0 0.0.0.255
  ACL 101 by ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
  overload of IP nat inside source list 101 interface FastEthernet0/1

  VPN access list will use the source as 10.1.0.1... *.

  Let me know if it works.

  Concerning

  M

• How routed internet traffic to IPSec

  Hello

  We have a central site and six branches.

  I can easily configure tunnel VPN site to site between split headquarters and all branches, using tunneling, as well as LAN-to-LAN connection goes via VPN tunnel.

  Now we want centralized all traffic, including Internet-destiny, so that all the branches will go to internet on our internet links HQ.

  The site of HQ, we have ASA 5510 (ending point for VPN connections) and want to monitor all the traffic, using the module Websense or CSC for ASA.

  The question is: How do I configure this? :)

  Best regards

  Branko

  disable the split tunneling and in your crypto acl use licensed ip x.x.x.x where x.x.x.x any statement on the remote control.

  at Headquarters, the acl crypto be allow ip x.x.x.x any x.x.x.x.

  at HQ, enable the feature of interface security permitted intra even.