Allow Inet access to VPN customers

Hello

my network is 10.21.21.0/24 as well as a local pool for the VPN Clients 10.21.21.100 - 200. Crypto map ist so the External value. There is no split tunneling configured for them. How can I get NAT Inet access clients? With any ACL I create, he got forward with their private IP (10.21.21.100).

Any ideas?

Thank you

MB

This document describes how to configure a firewall PIX 7.0.1 and later to run IPsec on a stick. This configuration applies to a particular case where the PIX does not allow the split tunneling, and users connect directly to the PIX until they are allowed to go to the Internet.

http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080103ed0.shtml

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

  • Access remote VPN question - hairpin

    Hello, I did a search before posting this question but I have not found anything specific to my situation.

    We have our ASA5520 configured in our main office to allow remote access Cisco VPN client users to access our network.  We have a (network 192.168.1.0/24) remote desktop we have a configured on the same ASA5520 VPN IPSec tunnel that allows the use of internal users (in the main office) to access resources on the network remote (192.168.1.0) and vice versa.  The problem is that when users connect to the remote VPN access, they are not able to access the resources of the remote office network.  We created the nat0 ACL and labour, and split tunnel routing is implemented for users VPN remote network access (if I make a copy of the route on my laptop after connecting to the VPN, I see the road to 192.168.0.0/24 in my routing table).  Routing everything is in place to do this, since the IPSec VPN tunnel is up and working.  My suspicion is that the question has something to do with the consolidation of these VPN clients.

    What else needs to be configured to work?  Thank you.

    Hi Scott,.

    I have a client with a PIX 515E which allows connections to remote VPN and VPN LAN2LAN multiple connections.

    We had this problem too... so what I made in my pix was:

    TEST (config) # same-security-traffic intra-interface permits (its off by default)

    If you use ASDM go to:

    Configuration > Interfaces >

    at the bottom of this page, there is an option that says: 'enable traffic between two or more host computers connected to the same interface '.

    Check and it should work... I hope

    I await your comments...

    Kind regards.

    Joao Tendeiro

  • Allowing external IP access via VPN Client

    We are looking for our remote VPN users to access an external IP address.  Basically once users authenticate when they try to access 202.1.56.19, they should be out nat through the external interface of the firewall.  Below is out of the package violated on "vpn ecrypt" tracer and as an extract from the config.  On the client, I see that the road to 202.1.56.19 was added, but it does not work.

    Please advise more information be required ing.  Thank you.

    access list INSIDE-OUT scope ip 10.15.160.0 allow 255.255.255.0 any
    access OUTSIDE list / allowed extended Interior ip 10.15.160.0 255.255.255.0 any
    Access-group OUTSIDE / inside interface OUTSIDE-IDC

    NONATIDC list of allowed ip extended access all 10.15.160.0 255.255.255.0

    NAT (INSIDE) 0-list of access NONATIDC
    NAT (INSIDE) 1 10.15.160.0 255.255.255.0
    Global (OUTSIDE-IDC) 1 128.15.155.2

    internal CorpVPN group strategy
    attributes of Group Policy CorpVPN
    value of server DNS 10.15.155.17
    VPN-idle-timeout no
    VPN-session-timeout no
    Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec
    Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
    value of Split-tunnel-network-list SplitTunnel
    something.com value by default-field

    attributes global-tunnel-group CorpVPN
    address pool CorpVPNpool
    Group Policy - by default-CorpVPN
    IPSec-attributes tunnel-group CorpVPN
    pre-shared key

    Standard access list SplitTunnel allow 192.168.168.0 255.255.255.0
    SplitTunnel list standard access allowed host 202.1.56.19

    Packet-trace input outside-iDC tcp 10.15.160.18 22 202.1.56.19 22

    Phase: 1
    Type: ACCESS-LIST
    Subtype:
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    Implicit rule
    Additional information:
    MAC access list

    Phase: 2
    Type: FLOW-SEARCH
    Subtype:
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    Additional information:
    Not found no corresponding stream, creating a new stream

    Phase: 3
    Type:-ROUTE SEARCH
    Subtype: entry
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    Additional information:
    in 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 OUTSIDE-IDC

    Phase: 4
    Type: ACCESS-LIST
    Subtype: Journal
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    Access-group OUTSIDE / inside interface OUTSIDE-IDC
    access OUTSIDE list / allowed extended Interior ip 10.15.160.0 255.255.255.0 any
    Additional information:

    Phase: 5
    Type: IP-OPTIONS
    Subtype:
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    Additional information:

    Phase: 6
    Type: CP-PUNT
    Subtype:
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    Additional information:

    Phase: 7
    Type: VPN
    Subtype: ipsec-tunnel-flow
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    Additional information:

    Phase: 8
    Type: VPN
    Subtype: encrypt
    Result: DECLINE
    Config:
    Additional information:

    Result:
    input interface: OUTSIDE-IDC
    entry status: to the top
    entry-line-status: to the top
    output interface: OUTSIDE-IDC
    the status of the output: to the top
    output-line-status: to the top
    Action: drop
    Drop-reason: flow (acl-drop) is denied by the configured rule

    Essentially, the traffic needs to make a u-turn at ASA outside interface if I understand your configuration.

    You need the following to make it work.

    -permit same-security-traffic intra-interface

    -Host202 of the 10.15.160.0 ip access list permit 255.255.255.0 host 202.1.56.19

    -nat (OUTSIDE-IDC) 1 access-list Host202

  • I was blocked from my Windows Live Hotmail account, and there is no one to talk with to allow me access to it.

    I've been locked out of my HOTMAIL and there is nobody to talk with to allow me access to it.  I had to sign with another user for the Live ID account, and I can't get back my regular HOTMAIL account.  A hacker sent letters to everyone in my e-book asking money from them to get out me of Cyprus.  I don't understand all this madness.  I just want my account back but you refuse to allow me to connect.  I'm locked up.  Give advice on how to recover my account.

    original title: I want my ACCOUNT HOTMAIL BACK!

    Well, it is not in the right place, unfortunately.

    This forum is for Microsoft Security Essentials and we are customers compatriots.

    If you cannot reset the password by the usual means, see this page for more information on how to get help with it:

    http://windowslivehelp.com/solution.aspx?SolutionID=bf5d34bf-DB28-44CA-AC9A-93838d81b2d6

    There is a form to use the Support will be on, but it may take more than a day for them to cope. Don't forget to enter the account that you cannot access and another account where they can reach you. Once you have again access to the account don't forget to put an alternate email address and secret questions and answers for the security account tohttp://account.live.com

    You can also view these messages:

    https://windowslivehelp.com/solution.aspx?SolutionID=6ea0c7b3-1473-4176-b03f-145b951dcb41

    https://windowslivehelp.com/solution.aspx?SolutionID=91b88c76-30EC-4879-9c72-0dd425a5b5f3

    And also these entries from the Windows Live team blog:

    http://windowsteamblog.com/windows_live/b/windowslive/archive/2010/09/27/Hotmail-security-updates-protect-you-from-account-hijackers.aspx

    http://windowslivewire.spaces.live.com/blog/CNS! 2F7EB29B42641D59! 42740.entry

    ~ Microsoft MVP Windows Live ~ Windows Live OneCare | Live Mesh | MS Security Essentials Forums moderator ~.

  • Allowing ports through a VPN tunnel question

    I have a VPN tunnel established and I can ping above but my application fails and I think its because I encouraged not 2 ports (ports TCP 19813 and 19814) through. I'm not clear how should I do for allowing these ports through. I need to add a statement to permit to access my list 'sheep' or what I need to add a statement of license to my list of access interface "external"?

    Remote users have an IP address of 172.16.5.x 24 and they're trying to connect to users on the 192.168.200.x 24 192.168.201.x 24. I can't do a ping of the 24 192.168.200.x to the 172.16.5.0/24.

    The commands below are what I currently have in my PIX.

    My current sheep-access list:

    IP 192.168.201.0 allow Access-list sheep 255.255.255.0 172.16.5.0 255.255.255.0

    IP 192.168.200.0 allow Access-list sheep 255.255.255.0 172.16.5.0 255.255.255.0

    My current outside of the access-list interface:

    acl_inbound list access permit tcp any host xx.xx.xx.xx eq smtp

    acl_inbound list access permit tcp any host xx.xx.xx.xx eq - ica citrix

    acl_inbound list access permit tcp any host xx.xx.xx.xx eq www

    acl_inbound list access permit tcp any host xx.xx.xx.xx eq www

    acl_inbound list access permit tcp any host xx.xx.xx.xx eq www

    acl_inbound list access permit tcp any host xx.xx.xx.xx eq 500

    acl_inbound esp allowed access list any host xx.xx.xx.xx

    acl_inbound list access permit icmp any any echo response

    access-list acl_inbound allow icmp all once exceed

    acl_inbound list all permitted access all unreachable icmp

    acl_inbound list access permit tcp any host xx.xx.xx.xx eq www

    acl_inbound list access permit tcp any host xx.xx.xx.xx eq https

    first of all, you disable the commnad "sysopt connection permit-ipsec" on the pix? with this enabled command, which is enabled by default, the pix will ignore any ACLs for encrypted traffic. so if you have Hell no this command, then the acl that you applied on the outside int won't make a difference.

    However, if "sysopt connection permit-ipsec" is always on, and then all the port/protocol should be allowed.

    you said you could do a ping of 192.168.200.0 to 172.16.5.0. How about you 172.16.5.0 to 192.168.200.0 and 192.168.201.0?

    also, just wondering if the vpn lan-to-lan or access remote vpn (i.e. using the cisco vpn client).

  • 64-bit machine access 887VA VPN

    Hi guys,.

    I have a VPN solution for remote access in place of a Cisco 887VA router running.

    Until recently, all remote users were both OSX and WinXP users and as such as the native client VPN and VPN Cisco Client 5.x worked perfectly. Now, I have a user who is trying to connect using a Windows machine 7 64-bit which he apprers is not supported by this type of client and documentation, I can find says that there is no alternative other than the AnyConnect platform.

    I ran up to a Windows 7 machine to set up an AnyConnnect client that is a failure on the connection.

    After reading further the AnyConnect administration guide I see that it says this will allow only access to a device of type ASA with no mention of an IOS device.

    Is this the case? If Yes, how someone connect a 64-bit computer for a remote access vpn based IOS?

    I'm confused and I'm not going to be able to allow users of 64-bit on the VPN network.

    Any guidance is appreciated.

    Thank you

    Bruno

    Yes, you can still use IPSec VPN Client (version 5.0.7 (440)) to connect, however, Yes, IPSec VPN Client is going EOL.

    Here are the name of the file that you can download which take supported Windows 7 64-bit: vpnclient-winx64-msi - 5.0.07.0440 - k9.exe.

    Notification of end of LIFE for the VPN Client are:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/prod/collateral/vpndevc/ps5743/ps5699/ps2308/end_of_life_c51-680819.html

    You can also use the AnyConnect for remote access to the router IOS, however, you must purchase the SSL VPN license to connect using the AnyConnect client.

    Hope that helps.

  • Divide access remote vpn tunnel ASA 5520

    Hello

    I'm setting up a vpn for remote access with split tunnel, but I use an acl extended to match a host and http to destination port, but does not work.

    Scenario of

    Distance access(10.0.0.122/24)--internet---Cisco ASA(inside:192.168.10.1/24)---ip = 192.168.10.6 - C6509 - 10.0.0.254/24---hote = 10.0.0.31/24

    The plot is when I activate the IP service connection or flow ICMP worked. Does anyone have an idea what is the problem? Thank you

    Concerning

    Split tunneling does not take into account the port information you specify in the ACL, he doesn't care the ip address/network you defined.

    If you want to restrict access to ports and IP, you must define your split tunneling with only ip addresses and using a vpn-filter acl in group policy to restrict following the specific ports that you want:

    split_acl ip access list allow

    access-list allowed filter_acl ip eq

    attributes of group-pol

    Split-tunnel-pol tunnelspecified

    value of Split-tunnel-net split_acl

    VPN-filter value filter_acl

    -heather

  • VPN to access LAN VPN clinet.

    We use a PIX 515 as the hub of a LAN to LAN VPN as well as to access VPN Clinet. Using a multipoint configuration sites speaks (all PIX 501) are able to communicate with each other. However, the VPN to access the 515 client are not able to access the VPN sites has talked about. I think that it is due to the fact that put an end to all tunnels on the same interface of the PIX 515. Is there a way to allow the VPN CLient to communicate with the LAN VPN spoke?

    Concerning

    PD

    Currently, it is not a good way to meet the requirements above. However, add us a new item (or rather, a restriction of relax) for the PIX 7.0 code (to be released in December/January) to allow clients VPN packets 'u-turn' on a Hub PIX to PIX spoke connected via Lan-to-Lan tunnels. The program 7.0 beta is about to begin (may have just begun) so if interested, please contact your local account engineer Cisco. Sorry for the news but help is on the way.

    Scott

  • 2 VPN SITE to SITE with ACCESS REMOTE VPN

    Hello

    I have a 870 router c and I would like to put 2 different VPN SITE to SITE and access remote VPN (VPN CLIENTS) so is it possible to put 3 VPN in the router even if yes can u give me the steps or the sample configuration

    Concerning

    Thus, on the routers will be:

    Cisco 2611:

    LAN: 10.10.10.0/24

    access-list 100 permit ip 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 10.10.20.0 0.0.0.255

    access-list 100 permit ip 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 10.10.20.0 0.0.0.255--> VPNPOOL

    !

    10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map clientmap

    defined by peer 172.18.124.199

    match address 100

    !

    IP local pool ippool 14.1.1.1 14.1.1.254

    !

    access-list 120 allow ip 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255

    access-list 120 allow ip 10.10.20.0 0.0.0.255 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 --> NETWORK REMOTE

    !

    crypto ISAKMP client configuration group ra-customer

        pool ippool

    ACL 120

    !

    Please note that the configuration is incomplete, I added that relevant changes, you should bring to the allow clients of RA through the LAN-to-LAN tunnel, of course, the LAN-to-LAN settings should match to the other side of the tunnel that is mirror of ACL, NAT and so on.

    HTH,

    Portu.

  • Access linux VPN client XP host

    Hi all

    I am running VMWare workstation 6.5 on Linux (Gentoo) with a guest of Windows XP. In the host, I connect to a cisco VPN using vpnc and changing tables of road I have access to the VPN as well as the rest of the local network (including the internet). I want to be able to access the VPN connection (i.e. Access IP address provided by the VPN connection) of the XP client. I know that I can use ssh to tunnel of these connections, but I need to configure a tunnel by ip/port that I connect. At the moment the guest is using bridged networks (it has its own IP address on my local network).

    Is the an option of the network configuration in VMWare which will allow the guest to access all interfaces (eth0 and tun0) on the host computer and carry the traffic to these interfaces accordingly?

    Thank you

    Allistar.

    Hello Allistar-

    If you configure the client to use the NAT networking, you will be able to access all networks visible to the host (eth0 and tun0) automatically.  If you need to expose the ports on the outside guest to the host's network, port forwarding can also be configured through the virtual network Editor.

    Good luck

    Mike H

  • Ready NAS 4220 command terminal to disabled checkbox "allow instant access."

    I have a temp 4220 readynas as a file server, joined an ad. 6.2.4 current firmware

    There is also a file indexing on-site 24/7 running. It indexes action 4.

    I have a junior administrator who will recover the files deleted using the "snapshot" function

    The issue is the 'allow instant access' remains on by accident. This causes the indexing of file index all snapshots. This pushes the index to 60 + GB in size. It will grow if big, that it stops new classes of indexing files. If it not to index the snapshots, the database will be around 4 GB.

    I would like a cron job to disable the 'allow the snapshot' nightly at 02:00.

    I can't find an online resource that gives enough details on the function of snapshot except how to delete snapshots. I want to deactivate access according to a schedule and keep the snapshot running.

    Garet

    Thanks for looking into this for me.

    I thought that it might be a terminal command to do this.

    Garet

  • Call for cold scam to allow remote access to my computer

    I was cold called by telephone by a person claiming to work using Windows. I was invited to allow remote access check for errors from the window and was invited to make a Paypal payment for a renewal of my windows. This payment would require me to enter passwords to Paypal, etc while this technician was still working on the computer. Is it a scam? The technician left a reference code and phone number.

    I was cold called by telephone by a person claiming to work using Windows. I was invited to allow remote access check for errors from the window and was invited to make a Paypal payment for a renewal of my windows. This payment would require me to enter passwords to Paypal, etc while this technician was still working on the computer. Is it a scam? The technician left a reference code and phone number.

    It's absolutely a scam.  Microsoft is not / will not make these calls.

    Do not always allow remote access to your PC to someone who calls you out of the blue...
    You can call your local police department to ask if they follow this (given that the appellant gave a phone number.)  But, I guess the number is false or leads to a place outside the country, or...?
  • How to allow another access to the computer through firewall

    How to enable another computer game acess my fire wall

    Hi Roy,

    If you are using Windows Firewall, the last item in this article shows you how to open a port in the firewall to allow access: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/Firewall-frequently-asked-questions.

    For more information, see the following: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc722062 (WS.10) .aspx.

    It may be more than just the firewall.  You need to allow remote access (in control panel / system / remote settings / Remote Access) and Remote Desktop (same place, but just below).

    Here is an article on the remote desktop for Vista: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows-vista/Remote-Desktop-Connection-frequently-asked-questions (because I do not know your operating system - you can perform a search Bing for office remotely for your operating system to find something similar).

    I hope this helps.

    Good luck!

  • Global tech scam - I allowed fraudsters access to my computer until I took on

    original title: scam global tech

    I allowed fraudsters access to my computer, before I was caught., they can access when I go online again, is there anyhing I do.

    http://ask-Leo.com/i_got_a_call_from_microsoft_and_allowed_them_access_to_my_computer_what_do_i_do_now.html

    http://www.Microsoft.com/security/online-privacy/msName.aspx

    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/securitytipstalk/archive/2010/03/09/Don-t-fall-for-phony-phone-tech-support.aspx

  • Windows cannot access \\RIPSERVER. You are not allowed to access \\RIPSERVER... I can see the \\RIPSERVER on my network but cannot connect.

    Windows cannot \\RIPSERVERaccrss. You are not allowed to access\\RIPSERVER... I can see the\\RIPSERVER on my network but cannot connect. I'm running with 3 computers XP Pro windows SBS 2003 domain and a Windows 2000 (\\RIPSERVER) runs a computer to plate system that I use every day. I just added a new computer Windows 7 Professional and can see everything on the network (domain), I can access the server drives (where we keep the file sbs 2003), but when I click on the\\RIPSERVER I get error (cannot access...) If I do the same with any of the XP computers that he connects very well. Please help as I cannot connect I have to make my new computer an XP and I wanted to start to learn the Windows 7 operating system. Please let me know if you need more information on my systems.

    Thanks in advance for your help.

    Hi RC383,

    Your question of Windows is more complex than what is generally answered in the Microsoft Answers forums. It is better suited for the IT Pro TechNet public. Please post your question in the TechNet forum.

    Link, please refer to:http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/itproxpsp/threads

    With regard to:

    Samhrutha G S - Microsoft technical support.

    Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

Maybe you are looking for