Allow Max in ISE rules

Similar Questions

• ISE rules

  Hello

  Could someone please look at the diagram attached requirement. The ISE Cisco must be configured accordingly. Do I have to create rules for authorization for the achievement of these results? I wonder that in the authorization of the ISE conditions where I could find things like (I'm trying to figure) "windows service pack 1 equal", "operating system is windows 7", etc..

  Or is it also I need to look for the configuration of these requirements? Is - this must be done according to the rules of Posture?

  Thanks in advance for your help.

  Kind regards

  Quesnel

  Need to create a condition of result of posture that would be something like:

  If OS is equal to 'everything' if 'condition of posture' another 'repair action '.

  Most of the BONES should be already there.

  Posture conditions come pre loaded, so you only need to select either pc_W7_SP1_int.

  Even for sanitation, many are created, or you can create new institutions.

  Once the rules of posture requirements, you can create the policy if a group of identity corresponds to the OS then the requirement will be that you have created a rule.

• Cisco default ISE rule messed up

  Hi all

  After adding AuthZ policies one after another, the strategy of default rule is messed up. See the image below. The default value becomes a regular policy and the final strategy in the list becomes a default rule as policy. The name cannot be changed and 'If no matches' can not be changed also. Looks like a bug to me.

  Has anyone experienced this before and was able to solve it?

  

  Thank you in advanced for your answers and solutions.

  Kind regards

  JS Chew

  You might encounter this:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/TS/fn/636/fn63635.html

  TAC can help you reorganize the rules if this is the case.

• ISE GANYMEDE device Fitlers

  I'm migration of ACS to LSE for GANYMEDE.  GBA, we used device filters to define a list of network devices and allows you to create rules to match or does not within access policies.  I may not know how to do the same function in ISE.

  Yo can do this by selecting "network access: device IP address.

  Hope it meets your request.

  Concerning

  Gagan

  PS: note as correct if it helps!

• Discover the cause of failure of 802. 1 x ISE of the root?

  I'm putting a MacBook on our internal Wifi.

  For this, I create an XML file using the IPhone Configuration utility. Pretty simple. Tell him what SSID, PEAP, CERT to use, and then import this file into the MacBook.

  Bottom line is that it is never my ISE rules, if I get the default Deny.

  It is the first attempt to get a Mac on the network. Windows machines are adjusted upward and works very well on the internal Wifi.

  I confirmed with the AD administrator that this machine name is in their system. As you can see, it authenticates to AD.

  It seems that it 802. 1 x is a failure. How can I know * exactly * why? I can't tell if it's a cert question, or something else.

  Any suggestions on the search for the cause root?

  Thank you!

  ISE, the MAC address of my Mac:

  [snip]

  11001: received from RADIUS access request
    
  11018: RADIUS re - use an existing session
    
  12302: extract EAP-response containing PEAP challenge-response and accepting as negotiated PEAP
    
  12319: has successfully PEAP version 1
    
  12800: Extracts first TLS record. TLS handshake began
    
  12805: extract TLS ClientHello message
    
  12806: prepared message ServerHello TLS
    
  12807: prepared TLS certificate message
    
  12810: prepared TLS ServerDone message
    
  12305: EAP-request prepared another challenge PEAP
    
  11006: returned access RADIUS Challenge
    
  11001: received from RADIUS access request
    
  11018: RADIUS re - use an existing session
    
  12304: from EAP PEAP containing stimulus response / response
    
  12305: EAP-request prepared another challenge PEAP
    
  11006: returned access RADIUS Challenge
    
  11001: received from RADIUS access request
    
  11018: RADIUS re - use an existing session
    
  12304: from EAP PEAP containing stimulus response / response
    
  12305: EAP-request prepared another challenge PEAP
    
  11006: returned access RADIUS Challenge
    
  11001: received from RADIUS access request
    
  11018: RADIUS re - use an existing session
    
  12304: from EAP PEAP containing stimulus response / response
    
  12305: EAP-request prepared another challenge PEAP
    
  11006: returned access RADIUS Challenge
    
  11001: received from RADIUS access request
    
  11018: RADIUS re - use an existing session
    
  12304: from EAP PEAP containing stimulus response / response
    
  12305: EAP-request prepared another challenge PEAP
    
  11006: returned access RADIUS Challenge
    
  11001: received from RADIUS access request
    
  11018: RADIUS re - use an existing session
    
  12304: from EAP PEAP containing stimulus response / response
    
  12305: EAP-request prepared another challenge PEAP
    
  11006: returned access RADIUS Challenge
    
  11001: received from RADIUS access request
    
  11018: RADIUS re - use an existing session
    
  12304: from EAP PEAP containing stimulus response / response
    
  12319: has successfully PEAP version 1
    
  12812: message ClientKeyExchange retrieved TLS
    
  12804: message retrieved over TLS
    
  12801: prepared TLS ChangeCipherSpec message
    
  12802: prepared TLS finished message
    
  12816: TLS handshake succeeded
    
  12310: full of PEAP handshake is completed successfully
    
  12305: EAP-request prepared another challenge PEAP
    
  11006: returned access RADIUS Challenge
    
  11001: received from RADIUS access request
    
  11018: RADIUS re - use an existing session
    
  12304: from EAP PEAP containing stimulus response / response
    
  12313: in-house method PEAP began
    
  11521: prepared / EAP identity request for inner EAP method
    
  12305: EAP-request prepared another challenge PEAP
    
  11006: returned access RADIUS Challenge
    
  11001: received from RADIUS access request
    
  11018: RADIUS re - use an existing session
    
  12304: from EAP PEAP containing stimulus response / response
    
  11522: extract EAP-Response/Identity for inner EAP method
    
  11806: EAP-request for the internal method offering EAP-MSCHAP VERSION challenge prepared
    
  12305: EAP-request prepared another challenge PEAP
    
  11006: returned access RADIUS Challenge
    
  11001: received from RADIUS access request
    
  11018: RADIUS re - use an existing session
    
  12304: from EAP PEAP containing stimulus response / response
    
  11808: extract EAP-response containing EAP - MSCHAP VERSION challenge response to the internal method and accepting of EAP - MSCHAP VERSION such as negotiated
    
  15041: evaluation of policies of identity
    
  15006: match a default rule
    
  15013: selected identity Source - AD-myconame
    
  24430: user authentication to Active Directory
    
  24402: Active Directory user authentication succeeded
    
  22037: authentication passed
    
  11824: trying to authenticate EAP-MSCHAP VERSION passed
    
  12305: EAP-request prepared another challenge PEAP
    
  11006: returned access RADIUS Challenge
    
  11001: received from RADIUS access request
    
  11018: RADIUS re - use an existing session
    
  12304: from EAP PEAP containing stimulus response / response
    
  11810: extracted EAP-response to the internal method containing MSCHAP stimulus / response
    
  11814: successful authentication inner EAP-MSCHAP VERSION
    
  11519: prepared EAP-success for the inner EAP method
    
  12314: PEAP internal method completed successfully
    
  12305: EAP-request prepared another challenge PEAP
    
  11006: returned access RADIUS Challenge
    
  11001: received from RADIUS access request
    
  11018: RADIUS re - use an existing session
    
  12304: from EAP PEAP containing stimulus response / response
    
  24423: ISE was not able to confirm the previous machine successfully authentication of user in Active Directory
    
  15036: evaluate the authorization policy
    
  24432: looking for Active Directory user - myfirstname.mylastname
    
  24416: recovery of the Active Directory user groups succeeded
    
  15048: questioned PIP
    
  15048: questioned PIP
    
  15048: questioned PIP
    
  15048: questioned PIP
    
  15048: questioned PIP
    
  15004: matched rule - default
    
  15016: choose the permission - DenyAccess profile
    
  15039: rejected by authorization profile
    
  12306: the successful PEAP authentication
    
  11503: prepared EAP-success
    
  11003: returned to reject access RADIUS

  Thank you for taking the time to come back and share the solution to the problem (+ 5 from me). You can also share the ID of the bug that you struck?

  In addition, you must mark the thread as "Response" If your problem is solved :)

• ASA 5525 X Anyconnect configuration with ISE 2.1

  I have a new deployment of ISE 2.1 which is used only for the management of the devices at the moment.  The intention is that it will serve as radius for authentication of our VPN server.

  5525 x is a brand new ASA runs the 9.4 code.  I want to configure VPN on the SAA strategy so that each user is assigned a DAP based on their Department.

  I already have the designation of the Department for user accounts assigned in AD through a group membership.  I don't know how to get ISE to belonging to a group at the ASA so that she can associate the user based on this correct in RAP group membership.

  I succumbed to determine how this is supposed to work.  Thanks for any help.

  @Jonathan Harrison ,

  Normally we authenticate and authorize users and then push DACL or allow connection from ISE etc. of such conditions profiles that check results Posture or parts constituting the identity of the user (such as AD or another external identity store belonging to a group).

  There are a couple of good guides to do so, including detailed examples:

  https://communities.Cisco.com/docs/doc-68158

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/Adaptive-Security-app...

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/AnyConnect-secure-mob...

  While they focus on the case of use of Posture, they can be adapted to add other uses. For example, ISE registration condition may be the result of not only a Posture check also membership in a given group or another if you make it a State.

  I do not think we can specify to the ASA to call a given font of DAP like Hostscan module cannot be used at the same time that the module ISE Posture. However, you should be able to accomplish just about everything you used to depend on the DAP with ISE Posture Module AnyConnect (assuming you have AnyConnect 4.x Apex licenses).

  If you want to stick with the ASA DAP model, you can forgo using policies and module ISE Posture and instead create an authorization profile (result) to send the ASA, a pair of RAY - V based on a correspondence (in the authorization of the ISE policy) with the ad group. He is a "Cisco-VPN-3000" A - V called "PIX7x-members-from' that can be used in ASA dynamic access policies. You can see (and all other pairs A - v supported buy ISE) here:

  https://communities.Cisco.com/docs/doc-67894

• Cisco ISE 1.4 comments account Backup

  I currently deploy portal free registry for comments, I now of questions you want to certify, I just want to know to anyone facing the same problem as me.

  (1) except REST API any way to export the guest account

  (2) backup of the Appendix will include the guest account or not

  (3) what deployment node 2, guest account will sync on both nodes?

  Sorry for the bad English.

  Kind regards

  Alan

  1.] I don't think - I can see a well on the same feature request

  CSCty82007    ENH: Export invited accounts set up in ISE

  2.] Yes - backup should have all guest accounts.

  [3.] the Cisco ISE guest services use distributed the Cisco ISE management system to allow several Cisco ISE nodes to work in a deployment. Configurations performed on the head node is replicated to the secondary nodes.

  ~ Jousset

• Ezvpn distance, not allowed to exempt NAT inside

  I'm a bit puzzled as to why I'm not allowed to have this rule of NAT exemption in place while the distance EZVPN is enabled.

  Here's my topology:
  

  I created a DHCP pool reserve based on the MAC address of my laptop; He received the reservation address.  I then created an exemption NAT to allow my laptop to communicate with the network 172.16.16.x.  Here is the config:

  access extensive list ip 172.16.16.0 inside_nat0_outbound allow 255.255.255.0 host 172.16.17.175

  Global (inside) 1 interface
  Global 1 interface (outside)
  global interface (guest) 1
  NAT (inside) 0-list of access inside_nat0_outbound
  NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
  NAT (guest) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0

  It works fine, but I cannot activate the EZVPN remote that I have configured on the SAA.  Here is the error:

  Output from the command: 'vpnclient enable '.

  * Delete "nat (inside) 0 inside_nat0_outbound.

  CONFLICT of CONFIG: Configuration that would prevent success Cisco Easy VPN remote
  operation was detected and listed above. Please solve the
  above a configuration and re - activate.

  I'm looking for two things, to explain why it is and why it is not allowed and help to set up a work around so that the two can be activated.  Any help would be appreciated.

  Thank you

  Steve

  OK, logical now.

  NAT exemption is so out of the game according to the guidelines of my post above (can't configure easy VPN and NAT exemption remotely on the same ASA).

  Second option, I have not tested myself, so just my theory that you can test:

  no nat control

  Since you have not stated nat on your external interface, it should allow that access you.

  Or third option, never tested:

  permit access-list static-sheep ip 172.16.16.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.17.0 255.255.255.0

  public static 172.16.16.0 (inside, outside) access list static-sheep

  Unfortunately, there are limited once the ASA is configured as Easy VPN remote, as it is supposed to be used just to access the HQ site.

• How to outsource reference data to the business rule processor?

  Details of the environment

  ======================

  Disqualification Version: 12.1.3.0.0

  By default, the reference (rules, controls and conditions) data used by the business rule processor comes to an excel file or stored in the repository database of the Disqualification.

  Is it possible to use a reference to the data that is stored in a different database (out of the repository database Disqualification) in the processor rule business?

  I tried the externalize option in the processor business rule, but on the identity tab, it is not allow me map the rule to the input attribute.

  

  

  Hello

  You can manage the rules from the outside, but you need to instantly and use research on stereotypes, because the rules of Business Check needs access to the rules at design time.

  -Mike

• OIM 11 g: create rules programmatically

  We need to create rules that are similar to the following:
  
  ORG1 Head Office User
  ORG1 user
  The retail user and Org2
  
  Currently, we can do it with rules and roles if we create the following rules:
  
  Rule 1: Head Office user: items: ((UDF_LOCATION == 123) OR (UDF_LOCATION))
  Rule 2: Org1 Head Office User: items ((organisation == Org1) AND (Head Office User rule))
  
  I can add it 'Org1 Head Office User' in General, a role, and all my Org1 head office users are assigned to the role. Everything works as expected.
  
  However, I can't find a way to create rules programmatically. Specifically, the need to create a rule for each Org (which there are 3000) won't be easy to manage.
  
  Is there an API that I have not seen that will allow me to create rules?
  
  Thank you.

  No APIs are available for rules. You can find the SQL query, but that is not recommended.

• Authentication open, works initially, but it fails

  We implement ISE for a customer. To start, we want to use the authentication open on some ports. When I set up "open authentication" on a port, the port guard actually data Vlan and I get a DHCP address to this Vlan, continues the authentication process. When the process is done (Ray, mab) and the customer is rejected, the port is changed to Guest Vlan.  If I remove 'open authentication', I am stuck right at the beginning, so I can verify that the command made a difference until the authentication process is done.

  If authentication fails, I thaught the command "open authentication" would preserve vlan settings for a port? Am I wrong?

  Hey Kjetil,

  You have the permission appropriate to the ISE rule? Don't forget that even if the authentication is set to 'Open' still have a rule of 'open' permission . This is usually done by configuring a rule of 'catch-all' at the bottom of your rules table. This rule allows all users/end points which does no other rules that you have configured in the ISE.

  I hope this helps!

  Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

• Level of privilege of the ACS and sets of commands

  Hi all

  I was in charge of the implementation of 5.6 ACS in order to allow members of the groups of domain security MS Access of specific order to our equipment. I the area association and groups added, I have an access policy with a rule that works so my field trial account can connect to the switch and perform only the commands in my command set.

  The problem is that when I assign a Shell profile with privilege level 7 min/max to the rule and the user logs on with this level, they are unable to see the commands that I welcomed in the Set command. Is it possible to have the ACS to say IOS to automatically change the visible commands to a specific privilege level when the user connects, even if they are not at this level of privilege?

  Any help greatly appreciated,

  Chris Menuey

  Because you're using command authorization and restrict the user to some orders, why do we use privilege 7 and not 15?

  ~ Jousset

• Junk e-mail filtering, continues after activate spam filtering is unchecked.

  I don't want E-mail on El Capitan to filter all mail to the junk e-mail folder. I unchecked enable mail junk filtering. I restarted Mail since unchecking filtering. I rebooted since unchecking filtering. As he did when the checked enable spam filtering, spam filtering continues. The only difference is that it allows garbage by now and does not mark as spam. He only filter emails at random junk from previous senders. Move the emails filtered from previous senders in the Inbox do not form the filter to allow this sender. Rules do not affect filtering of spam. For some shippers, I kept adding rules saying mail to the sender mail in the Inbox has never worked. Send these shippers go always undesirable.

  Junk mail filtering was overall a failure, so I want to turn it off. How can I disable junk mail so that it is actually not filtering?

  Thank you

  James

  What email provider is the associated e-mail account? They have their own filtering.

  iCloud separate filtering on the Web site.

  Gmail offers a separate Web site filtering.

  One of these could explain why messages are moved to the junk e-mail folder, but not labeled as junk mail.

• Firewalls in El Capitan

  Does anyone know how the Firewall works in El Capitan?

  I modified the apple script to add redirection rules and blocking and allowing services on a server that is also a gateway.  It is a script imported from a Maverick server that has a job for a couple of years without any problems.

  Nating and redirect works fine.  Blocking or allowing ports just does not work.  For example, the script blocks everything by default and then lets a few services.  Http is NOT on the list of authorized services.  Basic stuff.

  If I'm running pfctl(8) - sr, I see that my rules are loaded correctly.  But if I turn the Web service using the server application, it works fine on the external interface (en1): the service is available.

  I see in the Access tab ServerApp has set up a firewall to allow access, but these rules are not using pfctl(8).

  I look at all the anchor points too, but none has a rule to allow http.

  So, how does this work?  How can I fine tune the server firewall?

  [missionreste: 13:22] [/ Library/Preferences] % sudo pfctl(8) - sr | grep-i en1

  No ALTQ support in the kernel

  Disabled functions of ALTQ

  drop block in quick access on en1 proto tcp from any to any port = 21

  drop block in quick access on en1 proto udp from any to any port = 21

  move quickly on en1 inet proto tcp from 132.206.51.22 to any port = 22 flags S / HIS keep state

  move quickly on en1 inet proto tcp from 132.206.3.148 to any port = 22 flags S / HIS keep state

  spend out on en1 all status indicators to keep S / SA

  Go on en1 proto tcp from any to any port = 22 flags S / HIS keep state

  Spend on en1 inet proto tcp from 104.156.76.226 port = 5900 flags S / HIS keep state

  block fast on en1 proto tcp from < sshguard > drop to any label «ssh bruteforce»

  [missionreste: 13:23] [/ Library/Preferences]

  And of course, there is a rule to drop to initially block for any interface.

  Be easy on yourself. Icefloor allows to manage for you. (In respect of Jésus Vigo)

  Subsequently, you can see the effects in the command line for the different interfaces.

  Leo

• Exactly what ports are used to communicate with a cRIO?

  Can you provide this information (or point me to it). I want to implement a cRIO remotely through the internet, and I put it behind a firewall. I would like to know exactly what ports need to be forwarded to allow MAX to connect (when I say that it connects directly to a URL).

  Thank you

  Chris

  Chris

  Show This Article in the Knowledge Base that software ports OR use. Please refer to the Kb for more details.

  The cRIO, guests using

  44525 (discovery of target device Ethernet)

  3079 (front of LabVIEW RT TCP connections)

  3580 (OR Locator Service)

  80 (LabVIEW Web server)

  96 (FPGA compile server)

  (3537 if using VISA)

  (81 if you use Internet toolkit)

  (20 and 21 If you use FTP server).

  What are the Ports I need to open on my Firewall for National Instruments software products?