Attribute mapping between ldap and ecm11g internal user profile user

Similar Questions

• Error: No mapping between account and the security of ID names was done when trying to setup of Dragon NaturallySpeaking 10.

  Original title: no mapping between account and the security of ID names was done.

  I am trying to set up my Dragon NaturallySpeaking 10 program. My computer (Dell Studio 1550 on Win 7 64 bit) has been recently reset and during the reinstallation of the DNS and the subsequent fine adjustment, I came across a page that wanted my username and admin password.. I plugged in and it came up with the error message: "no mapping between account and the security of ID names has been done." There is one account on my computer and my admin. account. If something has been lost in resetting? How can I fix / security ID card? Thank you for your help.

  Hi Hasky620,

  I recommend you contact the support of Dragon NaturallySpeaking for assistance:

  http://www.nuance.com/support/index.htm

• Security using ldap and the RPD users

  Hello
  
  I need 5 dummy users in RPD. I don't want to give them adminstrator privileges because they are not allowed to see everything in my dashboard. My authentication works by using an LDAP server, is it possible that I can leave these fake users login as well as those on the LDAP server?

  I don't think it's possible to use the default Server BI and LDAP authentication. You can still have multiple LDAP servers for authentication. You can ask 5 service accounts to be created in the LDAP for OBIEE Protocol and assign privileges accordingly so they see only needed dashboards.

  Please allow the useful points,

  Thank you
  -Laurence.

• Difference between addChild and movieclip internal

  Hi all

  What is the difference bettween addChild and the movieclip that is in the movieclip.

  We can get these getChildAt() instance but

  According to the internal movieclip, we can get instance of 'mc.mcInternal '.

  But when I addChild in 'mc' is impossible to get this instance of this method 'mc.mcInternal '.

  What is the diffecenct between internal addChild and movieclip.

  Thanks in advance

  flashgeeks.

  Thanks Peter,.

  Once again, but it is possible to get the movieclip that is create from addChild(), normally access like this "mc.mcInternal".

  Not this way:

  mc.mcInternal = new Movieclip();

  mc.addChild (mcInternal);

  can I access this movieclip.

  trace (MC.mcInternal);

  Thank you very much

  theflashgeeks

• Correct mapping between OID and OAM

  Hello
  I installed Oracle Internet Directory and Oracle Access Manager. I am able to connect to Oracle Access Manager and Administration of Oracle identity using my default Admin ID - sleep. Now, when I am trying to add a new user, I get the error report that action is down and "waiting for Participant.
  
  Also, when I add a new user via, DIO he did not reflected in OAM and OIA.
  
  I don't know what is the error, as I am new to Oracle tools.
  
  Also, I think that the mapping is fine, otherwise I wouldn't have been able to connect in MSO, using sleep.
  
  You can help as soon as POSSIBLE.
  
  Kind regards
  Niranjan

  You can list all the details on your workflow of creating user you use?

  You have a custom user objectclass? It is configured in OAM? When adding the user in OID which user OC are you using?

  -shetty2k

• Mapping between Admin and WLST

  Hi all
  
  I have some .txt Admin (running with WebLogic 8.1) files, using the following commands (for a batchupdate of wladmin):
  -CREATE an mbean...
  -SET - mbean...
  -INVOKE - mbean...
  -CREATE_POOL...
  
  These Admin commands should be replaced by WLST (working with WebLogic 10.3) commands. I'm wrong if I think that the first three commands can be replaced by these WLST editing commands? [http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs92/config_scripting/reference.html#wp1179175]
  create
  set
  invoke
  
  How should I replace the last command (CREATE_POOL)?
  
  
  Best regards
  József

  Yes, you should be able to replace the first three with the commands you listed. With regard to the creation of a connection pool going, take a look at the following example:
  http://download.Oracle.com/docs/CD/E11035_01/WLS100/jdbc_admin/config.html#wp1068516

  Published by: ebergenh on July 29, 2009 10:02

• Between cc and cs6 indesign color profile

  Hi all

  I use indesign cc and cs6 in Windows 7 os based on the customer's requirement. When I change a color profile in indesign cs6 reflecting in indesign cc and vice versa. Is it possible to keep them unique?

  The only solution is to have several documents, each embodying the color settings you want, but otherwise identical.

  -Dov

• Mapping data between BI and another Oracle module

  Hello
  
  I'm working on a project for a Government of a county of Florida. We have a problem with project accounting R12 data match with OBIEE 11g database. It is more of a field of marking problem than a problem of integrity of data - for example, 'Customer number' in the accounting of the project is clearly a different data set than 'Customer number' in BI. We know the same data exists in BI but we do not know what it is called and therefore how interrogate him for reporting purposes. Why data marking is so messed up, I can't say, but I was in charge of mapping 'Customer number' (and everything else) in project accounting to the equivalent of the BI field. Supposedly this mapping does not already exist (which seems impossible since someone set up the flow of data between the two parts of the system at some point!). I hope someone can recommend an approach that doesn't end up being heavy and manual. Thank you!
  
  Warm greetings to all,
  
  John

  https://support.us.Oracle.com/OIP/faces/secure/km/DocumentDisplay.JSPX?ID=1274680.1#BODYTEXT

  OR

  Oracle Business Intelligence Applications ETL Data Lineage Guide version 7.9.6.2 and 7.9.6.3 [ID 1274680.1]

  Check this box... It gives you a document of data lineage... Mapping between source and target stage and...

  It certainly helps you the way that you look.

  MAK is useful if it helps...

  Kind regards
  Rayan Vieira

• Separate authentication for external and internal users?

  Hello
  
  Asked me to come with a CEP for a client who wants a new system APEX is accessible to internal and external users. The client security team want to have two separate copies of the request for the APEX and both copies of the auditor of the APEX on separate databases on two separate servers from Weblogic to support different security requirements for both internal and external users. I don't think that is necessary as APEX should be able to impose conditions depending on what type of user is connected, by questioning the cookie passed in which could contain a flag to say whether the user is internally and externally. In addition, CAE can be used to further restrict external access.
  
  The middleware for the customer solution is managed by a third party, who have made the following recommendations:
  
  The domestic channel requires SSO to configure on WebLogic while the outside lane. Internal users must be validated on Active Directory, with RSA Authentication Manager used for external users. We cannot set up a listener APEX instance to use and not to use SINGLE sign-on at the same time. Two applications are necessary.
  
  Now, I understand from my understanding limited the listener of the APEX, it is possible to implement different rules depending on the type of user to access. However, might just as well not be managed from Magnatune APEX? We could write a custom authentication procedure that verifies again road and the SSO user authentication cookie or otherwise, as required.
  
  So my question is this: can it really be necessary to implement two versions of an APEX application, with two distinct on different servers APEX headphones, to meet the security requirements of separate here? Ultimately at the end of the day if that's what the customer wants, we have to build it, but I'm looking to reassure them via a CEP that won't be necessary. I think that the seller of hardware/middleware recommend that the client just because they do not know available in APEX itself custom authentication options.
  
  Please forgive any simplifications or the lack of details in the above - I'm more a developer APEX as a person of the infrastructure and a bit of a 'newbie' where the listener APEX is concerned. All advice gratefully appreciated!
  
  Graham.

  Hi Graham,

  It's a matter of people paranoid how and to what extent they trust their own infrastructure. Things could be easier than to split the environments, but I don't know if I just depends on the cookie because cookie can be easily rigged. But I think that the following architecture would be safe:
  1 internal users connect APEX listener somehow security team requires, come to APEX and maybe be identified using the internal IP address (range). To simulate the INVESTIGATION period should be difficult for external users.
  2. external users connect APEX listener through a defined gateway, preferably a proxy. All future requests through this gateway would be considered external users.
  You may add additional logic to the proxy, for example use something like 'mod_headers' in Apache HTTPD to add a page header to requests, so that you may identify as external users.
  You could, of course, also put it the other Tower and allow internal users to use some proxy to enforce certain rules of IP based address, or perhaps a few additional references as authentication for access to the proxy (which again could be transparent user in AD-configuration, at least if you stick with IE).

  You can easily implement the separation in your custom authentication process. But this architecture also allows some other compromise: even if someone does not trust your application logic to handle two types of application successfully, you can also use the proxy to enforce the specific call for an application id. Certainly you don't need to duplicate the infrastructure...
  Most of the companies already have a proxy for external users, for example to activate SSL and to hide other internal resources, for load balancing,... so I think you just need to put some configuration of the existing infrastructure and end up needing no component additional. Even if there is no proxy and yet, it would be an element of very light weight, easy to handle.

  So far, all this has nothing to do with the earpiece of the APEX. It's 'just' a web front-end for the instance of the APEX in the database. I wouldn't put a logic of network security in this service, but the split things upward front. The APEX listener can be patched to add some logic, but which was not supported.

  I think that this would work and should be sufficient for most of the safety requirements.
  If my picture was not painted understandable, let me know.

  -Udo

• ldap and AAU card

  How we map info ldap (roles and groups) with groups and roles of the ucm? do we have to create the same roles and account in ucm as in ldap (read somewhere in the documentation). so, it becomes a manual activity.

  is there an auto sync-up happening between ldap and ucm data?

  Hello Mohan,

  Not necessary that you need to create the same set of roles at the Complutense University of MADRID. You can use the identification cards and map the ldap groups to the roles of the Complutense University of Madrid.

  For example:

  LDAP, you have defined groups that are the same as contributor (on ucm). Create an identification card, and then use the ldap to the Contributor group card.

  Check this forum for many messages on identification cards and how to use it.

  I hope this helps.

  Thank you

  Srinath

• LDAP and tnsnames

  Hi all
  
  can someone please explain the differences between LDAP and tnsnames?
  
  and the LDAP configuration for the oracle database.

  >

  can someone please explain the differences between LDAP and tnsnames?

  and the LDAP configuration for the oracle database.

  check the link below.

  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/B10500_01/network.920/a96580/config_c.htm

• Connectivity between Interconnect and Nexus 2000 fabric options

  Hello

  I would like to know what models of fabric nexus 2000 Extenders can I use if I want to connect them to a pair of interconnections 6248UP fabric in a FEX deployment, so I can move between blade and rack servers service profiles.

  Thanks for your replies.

  Christian

  Christian,

  Take a look at this guide.  It should answer all your questions:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/customer/docs/unified_computing/UCS/c-series_integration/ucsm2.0.2/b_UCSM_202_C-integration.html

  Kind regards

  Robert

• LDAP on SAA with the attribute-map

  Hi all

  I have problems to set up authentication of VPN clients on a LDAP server.  The main problem is when the ASA needs to decide a strategy group for users of the non-compliance.

  I use the LDAP attribute cards in the SAA to map the parameter memberOf attribute group Cisco-policy, can I associate the ad group that the user must belong to a VPN and rigth memberOf Group Policy access.  This method works correctly.

  But the problem is when the remote user is not in the correct group AD, I put a group by default-policy - do not have access to this type of users.  After that, all users (authorized and unauthorized) fall into the same default - group policy do not have VPN access.

  There are the ASA configuration:

  LDAP LDAP attribute-map
  name of the memberOf Group Policy map
  map-value memberOf "cn = ASA_VPN, ou = ASA_VPN, OU = my group, dc = xxx, dc is com" RemoteAccess

  AAA-Server LDAP protocol ldap
  AAA-Server LDAP (inside) host 10.0.0.3
  or base LDAP-dn = "My group", dc = xxx, dc is com
  LDAP-scope subtree
  LDAP-naming-attribute sAMAccountName
  LDAP-login-password *.
  LDAP-connection-dn cn = users, ou = "My group", dc = xxx, dc = com
  microsoft server type
  LDAP-attribute-map LDAP

  internal group NOACCESS strategy
  NOACCESS group policy attributes
  VPN - concurrent connections 0

  internal RemoteAccess group strategy
  Group Policy attributes RemoteAccess
  value of server DNS 10.0.0.3
  Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec
  field default value xxx.com

  tunnel-group RemoteAccess type remote access
  attributes global-tunnel-group RemoteAccess
  address-pool
  LDAP authentication group-server
  NOACCESS by default-group-policy
  tunnel-group ipsec-attributes RemoteAccess
  pre-shared key *.

  As you can see, I followed all of the examples available on the web site to solve the problem, but I can't get a good result.

  Does anyone have a solution for this problem?

  Kind regards

  Guzmán

  Guzman,

  It should work without a doubt, that is the part to refuse already works well and the user who has the correct memberOf attribute should certainly are mapped to Allow access policy and should therefore be allowed in.

  I think that's a bug as well, but I had a quick glance and see nothing correspondent, and if it was a bug in 8.2.3. so I'm not expecting you to be the first customer to discover this, so I'm still more inclined to think that it's something in the config that we neglect (I know frome experience typo can sometimes be very difficult to spot).

  Could you get "debug aaa 255 Commons", so please, maybe that will tell us something.

  BTW, just to be sure: you don't don't have anything (such as vpn - connections) configured in the DfltGrpPolicy, did you? Just double check since your access policy Allow would inherit that.

  Maybe another test, explicitly configure a nonzero value for this parameter in the policy allow access, i.e.

  Group Policy allow access attrib

  VPN - 10 concurrent connections

  Herbert

• No mapping between account names and security IDS made mistake by attempting to use the Task Scheduler

  I have noticed that my msfeedssync.exe were not working or updated so I went to the Task Scheduler to see what was going on and received the number above mapping between user names and security ID error I never use Task Scheduler, but I do not know its also used for RSS updates , I do all my own maintaince so I need only of GI RSS using a 3-year-old dimensions of dell with xp pro and its in tip top except for that shape it came only with a 80 GB hard drive and I've only used 20 concerts in 3 years that I use online for things important and backup storage I hope there is a solution for this because I installed ram to 4 GB and it has a 2.8 ghz Processor blazin fast and is in very good shape all help will be appreciated thanks

  Hello syncere99,

  1. What is the user account in the Task Scheduler are you for the work you are trying to use the Task Scheduler?

  The error code indicates that the user account that was used to create the job no longer exists. This could be because the user account is deleted. I suggest that you remove and re-create a job and check if you have the same problem.

  Thank you
  Irfan H, Engineer Support Microsoft Answers. Visit ourMicrosoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

• No mapping between account names and security IDS was done

  Hello

  I have a laptop of Acer under Vista Home Premium Service Pack 1.  I open advanced user accounts of & assistance, and I saw two names my old & news of the administrator. He used my name as the user name and my new name as the display name, so I deleted the old username & changed to match the full name (the new name).  After the change has been made, I get an error message "no mapping between account names and security IDS was done 26EE0668-A00A-44D7-9371-BEB064-C98683.  Now I can't access control panel to make changes to account. Help & Support in the start menu and Windows Explorer are no longer works. Tools on the toolbar doesn't work or the other.  I can't yet run a virus scan.  I did find something useful from my own research.  Help!

  Thank you
  Cheeszz
  P.S. I also started a McAfee Quick Clean to remove undesirable accumulation of the computer.  He cleaned the keys to an orphan registry, internet cache, temporary files & lost file fragments.  I don't know if he has also nothing to do with the error message.

  Hello Cheeszz,

  Thanks for posting your question on the Microsoft answers Forum.

  Essentially, you get the "no mapping between account names and security IDS was done" is because you now have an orphaned user account. This occurred when you deleted your old username which was still in use by the system under the name of each user name has a unique SID.

  I suggest that run you a system restore point, then you can go back to a previous point in time before you deleted the name of the user.
  Follow the article below for the establishment of a system restore procedure.

  936212 KB - how to repair the operating system and how to restore the configuration of the operating system to an earlier point in time in Windows Vista
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/936212

  You can also create a manual system restore point so that you can restore to that State in case of problems.
  Right-click on the computer icon in the desktop, then choose Properties
  In the left pane, click System Protection
  Alternatively, to directly access the System Protection tab, click Start and type SystemPropertiesProtection.exe.
  If you are prompted for an administrator password or a confirmation, type the password or provide confirmation.
  Click the System Protection tab and then click on create.
  In the System Protection dialog box, type a description, and then click on create.

  If you do not have a restore point system, try to see if LastKnownGood configuration might work for you.
  Click on the URL link to get help setting up the last known good configuration:
  http://windowshelp.Microsoft.com/Windows/en-us/help/cdb4c0dd-5698-4197-B906-d6a6d413621d1033.mspx

  Please respond and let me know if these suggestions helped get your problem solved or if you still need help.

  Sincerely,

  Marilyn
  Microsoft Answers Support Engineer
  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.