Authentication for ARM user restrictions

Similar Questions

• ACS5: method of different external authentication for each user account

  ACS4 I could specify a different external authentication for each user account. I'm trying to find a way to do the same thing to the ACS 5? When I go under identity in Access Services, I see the system requirement: username I can use to identify the user who logs in, so that I can directly to a source of different identity, but the separate political configuration for each user is very inconvinient and would require hundreds of policies, in our case.

  I was hoping that we can create a kind of attribute for each user. SysAdmin > Configuration > dictionaries > identity > internal users. I created the new attribute called 'Storage of identity' with the enumeration type, which has 4 values: internal, Entrust Token, Token RSA, counts AD and checked the box "add a political Condition." I can then go under each user and select the storage of identity for each user. But now I can't find where I can use under part of identity of an access policy. I can use it under "Group mapping" but that maps to one group and not to an identity store. I need to use it under the identity somehow, but I can't find how.

  Hello Roman,

  The attribute you created will be available when the user is authenticated through internel ID store, so that you cannot use to select the store ID.

  The best way to do this would be to use other attributes to differentiate the identity store.
  Allows you to create a sequence of identity store so that for each user, ACS will try to authenticate by using multiple identity store.

  For example, you can use these:

  Network status

  > End Station filter

  > Device filter

  > Devide filter Ports

  Here you can import filters from a file and it would therefore be more scalable.

  Hope this helps.

• Netsh for standard user restrictions

  I have restrictions on the wireless setup so that the user is not able to check "Show password" on a wireless network.

  There is a problem, the normal user can simply go into cmd and type in:

  netsh wlan show profile_name = [] key = clear

  they will receive a clear text password... How do I restrict the use of netsh for standard user he

  For win8.1, win8, win 7 Enterprise

  Of course, I didn't have this, good fishing.

  David, I just tested the following in my lab, you can disable access to netsh for all users in your domain (or via local policy) with a GPO. See the screenshot below.

  After application of the policy and start a test computer with a user account from following test happened when performing each of the following options.

  Restrictions error box is trying to run netsh via execution or in any other way, and as you can see the command line access has been disabled.

  User configuration > policies > administrative templates > system > "don't run specified Windows applications."

  Put Netsh.exe in the value field.

  Just above to mention previously policy is "To prevent access to the command prompt" enable this policy and set to Yes.

  If the real answer I should have given you that David had to define the GPO below, but I recommend disabling access to CMD by users in your environment too.

  

• Test command of the AAA for EAP - TLS authentication for wireless users

  Hi all

  Can anyone suggest me the test command to verify the eap - tls authentication for the Cisco WAP's wireless.

  If it's an authetication jump we can use the command to test the connection below

  Radius of group aaa Testwap-01 #test [email protected] / * / o4 & yJ) NoL$ new-code %0
  Trying to authenticate with the server radius group
  User successfully authenticated

  But eap - tls is not delivered with the password. He insists that for the user name.

  We strive for remote location then test remotely before production.

  If someone help pls in that if we have a command to test or debug command to test this authentication.

  EAP - TLS requires a client certificate. How can you have a simple command that analysis without loading any certificate on the router/switch? It does not exist. This is why eap - tls is not considered an easy to deploy eap method: because it can go wrong on several levels.

  The aaa command test performs a PAP authentication, therefore, it tests the connectivity of the base RADIUS and name of user and password.

  If it works, the only thing that can break for eap - tls are certificates, as well as the radius server will be able to tell if something worng.

• 506th PIX IPSEC VPN allow authentication for local users?

  We have a 6.3 (5) running PIX 506th, configured for Cisco's VPN IPSEC clients. Cisco VPN clients authenticate with the credentials of group fine, but is it possible to use local users to authenicate plu? We use local users to our existing PPTP VPN clients, but we want to migrate these users to IPSEC. Any info would be greatly appreicated.

  Of course, you can... you need to include the command on your card crypto below

  map LOCAL crypto client authentication

  I hope this helps... Please, write it down if she does!

• Beta 2 - authentication for connections user [schema] issue special succeeded.

  Sorry for all the threads, tried many things. :)
  
  I have a special account of my DBA on the development server which gives me additional access to things and rocking also my diagram to the main with all tables, which makes the Assistant EF works much more reliably. It uses a username of the form user [schema] (in the above example it would be Tester [SOMESCHEMA]), which allows me to access the scheme in question.
  
  I found that this does not work in the managed provider. I'm username/password invalid logon denied when I try. Switch to the provider unmanaged, it works fine. I don't know if this is a bug or a known limit, so I thought it was worth notice. Here's the script that the DBA uses to create the account:
  

  CREATE USER tester IDENTIFIED BY somepassword;
  GRANT CREATE SESSION TO tester;
  ALTER USER SOMESCHEMA GRANT CONNECT THROUGH tester WITH ROLE RL_App_Connect, RL_App_Master_Prxy;

  RL_APP_CONNECT has: create session, alter session.
  RL_APP_MASTER_PRXY has: how to create, create synonym, create the view.
  
  Thank you!
  
  Published by: Tridus on April 17, 2013 09:46

  I was able to reproduce this problem and have filed a bug (16727322).

• ACS Auth: Use of group data for the authentication of the user-> security problem?

  IM only using a VPN-installation (router, ACS, Cisco VPN Client) and I noticed that the name of the Group and the Group decrypted password can also be used in the second step of the authentication (the extent of authentication or authentication of users), which is a big security concern. What wrong with my setup.

  For the test I have set up a VPN configuration as described in cisco documents. Here, it also works. The identification information of the Working Group in the authentication of the user, too, which is quite logical, because the group credentials are also a user in the database of GBA. Of course, this user can be authenticated in the user authentication process.

  Who is wrong? How other admins to solve this problem? Am I wrong in my approach?

  Thank you!

  Yes, permission will have password for "cisco", at least for isakmp and pki. The group will send its name and password Cisco to receive the av pairs (ASA has a function to create a "good word of different past" but he's not here on IOS, AFAIR)

  It is a restriction known - you should not use the same server for authentication and authorization, with IOS and ASA.

  Did you give this property (either / or):

  -local isakmp authorization

  -l' authentication certificate (Group)

  -sharing features for authentication and authorization between servers.

  I don't think we can do much wise configuration to prohibit this behavior.

  Edit: spelling correction.

• For Cloud SGD LDAP authentication for users and administrators

  Hello.

  I recently completed the installation of my new cloud of SGD 12.1.0.3 on Linux 6.4 (on a virtual machine).

  My question is if it is possible (and how) to enable authentication for new administrator SGD through LDAP accounts?

  We have already our VM hosts configured to allow LDAP authentication to theirs, but how to configure WHO to enable LDAP authentication even as users of server?  Because users are in LDAP, they do not have a local account on the servers, and we do not necessarily want users of WHO in order to connect the servers anyway.

  One of the objectives to use LDAP is that we want to allow users to have only to change their domain/LDAP password and everything else is updated.

  I see that when an account is created in the OMS, the user is created in the repository of OMS database.  I really want to restrict not know them to log directly in the database, but do how this is possible.  Can we still use pupbld for this?  Probably not...

  I read the book below the Oracle documentation, but it is for SGD 11.1 and I'm under 12.1.

  But the same year, he was not very descriptive about how to set up.

  It sounds almost as if you had to take the decision to use LDAP for the installation of beginning of WHO.

  I hope not, and I do not remember that as an option that I have installed the SGD.

  Configuration of Oracle Enterprise repository to use external authentication tools - 11 g Release 1 (11.1.1.7)

  Yes, you can still integrate with LDAP.   Please see the documentation here

  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E24628_01/doc.121/e36415/sec_features.htm#CJAGHGAH

  EM use WLS for authentication, so everything that is supported by this version of WLS will work.  Documentation received instructions for OAM/OID/HAD and Active Directory are specified.

  Users can be changed to type external if they are already created in the repository with the appropriate connection name.   Otherwise, new users can be created.

  Also be sure to examine the external roles option, which allows you to map a LDAP group to an external role in EM by using the same name and automatically assigning the privileges required by this group.

• Separate authentication for external and internal users?

  Hello
  
  Asked me to come with a CEP for a client who wants a new system APEX is accessible to internal and external users. The client security team want to have two separate copies of the request for the APEX and both copies of the auditor of the APEX on separate databases on two separate servers from Weblogic to support different security requirements for both internal and external users. I don't think that is necessary as APEX should be able to impose conditions depending on what type of user is connected, by questioning the cookie passed in which could contain a flag to say whether the user is internally and externally. In addition, CAE can be used to further restrict external access.
  
  The middleware for the customer solution is managed by a third party, who have made the following recommendations:
  
  The domestic channel requires SSO to configure on WebLogic while the outside lane. Internal users must be validated on Active Directory, with RSA Authentication Manager used for external users. We cannot set up a listener APEX instance to use and not to use SINGLE sign-on at the same time. Two applications are necessary.
  
  Now, I understand from my understanding limited the listener of the APEX, it is possible to implement different rules depending on the type of user to access. However, might just as well not be managed from Magnatune APEX? We could write a custom authentication procedure that verifies again road and the SSO user authentication cookie or otherwise, as required.
  
  So my question is this: can it really be necessary to implement two versions of an APEX application, with two distinct on different servers APEX headphones, to meet the security requirements of separate here? Ultimately at the end of the day if that's what the customer wants, we have to build it, but I'm looking to reassure them via a CEP that won't be necessary. I think that the seller of hardware/middleware recommend that the client just because they do not know available in APEX itself custom authentication options.
  
  Please forgive any simplifications or the lack of details in the above - I'm more a developer APEX as a person of the infrastructure and a bit of a 'newbie' where the listener APEX is concerned. All advice gratefully appreciated!
  
  Graham.

  Hi Graham,

  It's a matter of people paranoid how and to what extent they trust their own infrastructure. Things could be easier than to split the environments, but I don't know if I just depends on the cookie because cookie can be easily rigged. But I think that the following architecture would be safe:
  1 internal users connect APEX listener somehow security team requires, come to APEX and maybe be identified using the internal IP address (range). To simulate the INVESTIGATION period should be difficult for external users.
  2. external users connect APEX listener through a defined gateway, preferably a proxy. All future requests through this gateway would be considered external users.
  You may add additional logic to the proxy, for example use something like 'mod_headers' in Apache HTTPD to add a page header to requests, so that you may identify as external users.
  You could, of course, also put it the other Tower and allow internal users to use some proxy to enforce certain rules of IP based address, or perhaps a few additional references as authentication for access to the proxy (which again could be transparent user in AD-configuration, at least if you stick with IE).

  You can easily implement the separation in your custom authentication process. But this architecture also allows some other compromise: even if someone does not trust your application logic to handle two types of application successfully, you can also use the proxy to enforce the specific call for an application id. Certainly you don't need to duplicate the infrastructure...
  Most of the companies already have a proxy for external users, for example to activate SSL and to hide other internal resources, for load balancing,... so I think you just need to put some configuration of the existing infrastructure and end up needing no component additional. Even if there is no proxy and yet, it would be an element of very light weight, easy to handle.

  So far, all this has nothing to do with the earpiece of the APEX. It's 'just' a web front-end for the instance of the APEX in the database. I wouldn't put a logic of network security in this service, but the split things upward front. The APEX listener can be patched to add some logic, but which was not supported.

  I think that this would work and should be sufficient for most of the safety requirements.
  If my picture was not painted understandable, let me know.

  -Udo

• Select a type of user account (for example, standard user, restricted user, and other types) on computer XP pro?

  Hello.

  I have a question about how to select the type of user account for each user account.

  I read that if I type 'control userpasswords2' term, it will bring up a window of hidden user accounts.  In this window, select a name of the user account and click property, click on membership group and it will show all the type of account you can purchase (including the standard user, restricted user, the other who has many other types)

  Here is the link I read

  http://www.exnol.com/globally-control-and-change-all-users-passwords-in-Windows

  Let's say my computer is XP pro and it is in the home (not domain joined ) working group. Am I able to set these types of accounts to my user account using 'control userpasswords2' just as I explained above?

  I was wondering because I read in the microsoft help article or somewhere that it indicates that the computer must be on the field to be able to choose the type of account by using this process, I explained, and one account type you can choose where your computer is located in the Working Group's account admin or limited using the control panel then click on accounts of users... but other said it should not be on the field... I got confused.

  I would like to try it myself, but I don't have XP pro computer with me right now, I'd appreciate it really if someone could help me with the answer.

  Hi greenyy,

  If you are the administrator of the machine Windows XP Professional, you can use the command 'control userpasswords2' and access the list of user accounts and change the type of account.

  You need not necessarily be on a domain, however, it may not work for some types of user accounts on a working group.

  A test, you can try to change the type of account for user accounts & check if it works.

  Reference: To change the type of user account 

  Hope the helps of information. Please post back and we do know.

  Concerning
  Joel S
  Microsoft Answers Support Engineer
  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

• Using filters Essbase to restrict access to OBIEE dashboards for multiple users

  Hello

  You can use Essbase filters to restrict access to the data in OBIEE dashboards so that users with no access to specific members are not able to see all data for multiple users.

  Any suggestions on how to go about it.

  Thank you!

  Hello

  Like any data source as an essbase.

  

  You can filter the data by the user, use a NQSESSION. to get the session the correct access.

  

  Kind regards

• Is their any restrictions on the total facilities of cloud creative app after purchase of the monthly subscription for each user?

  Is their any restrictions on the total facilities of cloud creative app after purchase of the monthly subscription for each user? For example, an application may not be installed on more than 1 computer. (Or it will break the policy of licensing or software etc.) ?

  1. You can install the software on as many computers as you want
  2. You can activate the software to be used on a maximum of any two computers at the same time
  3. You can only use one of the simultaneously active installations.

• How to get the authentication of the user for the link of the Questionnaire Survey Builder?

  How to get the authentication of the user for the link of the Questionnaire Survey Builder?

  Page 100

  The content can be dynamic and the link is unique to the participant, but they all go to Page 100, which has an alias of Q. The link is unique because of the value of the request passed not because of the page.

  Thank you

  -Jorge

• How to get an extension of the dictionary for all users in a Citrix environment?

  Hi all

  Under title, I'm looking for a way to get out a dictionary of Firefox (specifically the English (British) of https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/language-tools/) to all users in a Citrix environment. Comprehensive silent installation is absolutely best. Because following a recent installation of Firefox users report that this spell check is not working, what appears as a result there is no dictionary to check the spelling on the facility.

  It's in a corporate environment, running 6.5 XenApp hosted workstations to multi-server Windows 2008 R2 Enterprise x 64, the installed Firefox info below as collected by the add-on troubleshooting pulled from the browser in the test environment with the same characteristics.

  So far, I have tried what follows from this link: http://kb.mozillazine.org/Installing_extensions

  "A whole installation will install an extension in the directory of the application rather than in a profile so it will be available to all users. To perform a whole installation, you must not activate as within your Mozilla application installation file. Instead, download and save this record and make sure you close the application completely.

  Then follow one of the following options:

     Copy the .xpi file into the <installation directory>\extensions folder. When you start your Mozilla application again, it displays an installation dialog, asking "The following items were found in your Extensions folder. Do you want to install them?" "
  

  Although it seems that the < installation directory > \extensions folder no longer exists at the given location. Find a path of the < installation directory > \browser\extensions but seems it does not behave as said here that I have not received all of the guests. I hope that this method is still applicable in some way and I am just not aware of how this is currently supposed to be handled, but not sure if it is a dictionary rather than a typical add-on will have no effect on the installation overall how can be reached.

  Have also tried to http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2268437 , which seems a pretty basic option, but this would have not only to a lot of work to do on a per user basis, but there are also restrictions in place to prevent access to the records of users AppData.

  Finally I was looking https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/740545 to push this point across: the les parametres parameters configuration, then use the method above to enforce this on the user end, but did not find anything me.

  Any help/advice/shots of elbow in the right direction would be greatly appreciated.

  It might be easier to extract the files of two dictionary (.dic and .aff) of archive XPI (ZIP) and place the two files in the folder of Firefox profile for the dictionaries available for all users.

• Cannot enable authentication for 802. 1 x

  Original title: I can't change the properties on my wireless adapter to get the authentication of 802. 1 x. I get the error message.

  I get an error message when I right click on my wireless connection. I want to access authentication of 802. 1 x. need help, please.

  You see the error of not being able to find a certificate because you select 802.1 x.

  For a home wireless network, you don't want the box "Enable IEEE 802. 1 x authentication for this network"to check.

  What was the problem that you entered in the Properties dialog box of your first wireless adapter?  Normally, see you the list of available wireless networks, select one, click Connect and enter the password when you are prompted.

  I suggest that return you to the "Wireless networks" tab of the properties of the wireless adapter dialog box (it should look like this) and "Delete" all entries in the list of "Favorite networks."  Then go to list "View wireless networks" and connect from there.

  In addition, the foregoing assumes that you use Windows to configure your wireless network card (see the checkmark in the screenshot linked above).  If you use another utility - that came with your computer or your wireless adapter - you should disable that and activate windows (using the checkbox) or read the guide of the user for the utility to determine how to set up your wireless security.