Best monitor for graphics

Similar Questions

• What is the best monitor for the MacBook Pro?

  I want to get a 27 "monitor for my macbook Pro for my degree. Which is the best alternative for the thunderbolt display, as it is incredibly expensive. Thank you guys

  I prefer Samsung, and I deployed samsung monitors to dozens of designers who I support (27 "), but almost all of them use the same components of the same factories.

• Best monitor for animation

  Hi, I'm working on a big animation project.  I'll do all of the concept art to real animation, but I need a new monitor.  My budget is about $ 350.  At the moment I intend to buy the Samsung LS27A350HS.  I want a monitor 27 "for this kind of work, and I was told that it was the best for the price range.  What are your thoughts?  Is there a best instructor that I should look at?  I found a used Dell 2707wfp for $400, but I don't like the idea of not having a warranty.

  WARNING: Don't read this if you do not want a brutal honesty.

  Any monitor 27 "under 400 dollars is going to be the cheapest Chinese garbage at a low price on the market.  There is nothing wrong with the help of monitors cheap trash if things like the color accuracy, definition and calibration are not important for your work.  If you come to use your monitor for computer stuff and separated from output of your actual design work, that's fine.  But we must realize that, in this price range, your monitor never really represent any kind of calibrated, accurate picture.

  A lot of people on this forum use monitors that cost thousands of dollars, so don't expect to a monitor expensive to provide you with ALL the features that professionals consider important. You're shopping in the price range is low for someone who uses Word, so don't expect spectacular results for what it is so involved in animation by computer. If you work for broadcast, your price range simply don't buy you a proper monitor.

  Here are some tips I knew low range screens:

  Shiny screens are terrible, unless you are working in total darkness.  Make sure that you get a low gloss/Matt screen.  Don't be fooled by the impressive contrast of a glossy screen.

  LED monitors in your price range are not the height.  The colors are too intense, and we often see the image shift. Get a LCD display.

  Reference Dell are pretty good for the price monitors.  I use Dell monitors for the screens of my work, and I view my actual output of the much more expensive screens.

• The best monitor for Photo editing?

  I'm about to invest new 24' monitor but still can't decide what monitor should I expect. Can anyone recommend that won't break the Bank? I am a freelance photographer and most of my work more portrait and wedding and I only do it for part time. Here is my list of shooting

  1. Reference Dell U2412M
  2. HP ZR2440w
  3. ASUS PA248Q
  4. Dell U2410

  I guess that the OP refers to the use of range wide screen with LR, if relevant.

  If you print to a printer range inkjet (6 or more inks) that from a wide range will be useful. It will not provide a color accuracy much better than a gamut sRGB for web, screen and printing to standard printers of 4 CMYK inks. With the LR4 test function, you can get a rendering to the very accurate display of what the final output will look like using the target printer and paper profile.

  Range wide display will not render color correctly with most web browsers and other applications run without colors. For this reason, I also suggest using a dual display configuration with a standard screen of the sRGB gamut and a screen wide gamut.

  Also be aware that 10 bits/color will give the best rendering gradients very well on wide gamut displays, but LR currently supported only the outputs on 8-bit display / color. Only PS CS4 - CS6 support 10bits color output display. You must also use a graphics card which supports 10/bit color and compatible with PS.

  If you don't fully understand the differences between a range and gamut standard (sRGB) screen I suggest doing some research. Also search in this forum and the Web for customers on the screens you are considering. There has been many problems with calibration some views of wide range of model.

• Best Format for graphics for the book?

  I have a book to the third edition with an editor (see my Web site below), but I am now self published the fourth edition.  I wrote the previous edition in FM, and I had a number of drawings in Adobe Illustrator by an assistant in EPS; I put all the photos in TIFF format.  This seemed to work well, but these are the best choices?  This all in PDF format go to go to Createspace for self publishing/distribution.

  Thank you!

  John

  www.controlgeek.NET

  What are the deliverables of target?

  If none of the ebook formats, the drive defined the requirements.

  If the PDF in addition to printing, the file size of the issues (but is generally not a problem for the limit of 400 MB of CreateSpace).

  ... drawings made in Adobe Illustrator by an assistant in EPS

  Given that these are probably vector art and already PostScript, usually just EPS import. This guarantees a maximum quality to paper and max quality at all scales in PDF format.

  Exception: If the vector is extremely high, I rasterize to TIFF at 300 dpi or more. By saving the EPS to PDF from Illustrator, you can verify the impact PDF (don't forget to turn off thumbnail and preview, or redact metadata in Acrobat Pro).

  For EPS in any format of XML based e-book, I am tempted to the EPS first convert in SVG (i.e. XML), but framework trashes currently SVG on HTML and XML records, so you would need a post-processing step to convert the GIF, JPG or PNG SVG referenced or embedded reference.

• Which monitor is best for graphics at an affordable price?

  Hello

  Which monitor is best for graphics at an affordable price?

  In the hope of an answer

  Casper

  http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1083422-reg/eizo_cs240_coloredge_24_ips_lcd.html

  $826 including the ColorNavigator calibration software. This is a bargain and the best don't bang for the buck on the market today, no contest.

• Standard VGA graphic card: this device cannot start. Driver software (code 10) __Update: best driver for your device is already installed .__Windows has determined the best driver for your device software is up to date. ___

  Recently a support ACER technician kindly accompanied me the steps to uninstall the service in standard VGA graphics adapter before driver software he knew that I don't have an internet connection to download the ACER software (for an external monitor). I didn't download the ACER software and the original VGA utility software does not work. I was instructed to restart the computer and when I did it launched automatically install the factory driver, but now I have the error code. I tried updating the driver software but windows says it is the best software for my computer and it is updated. I did uninstall and restart. How can I get the Standard VGA adapter driver utility graph to work again?  I have a Sony VAIO Vista laptop. Help, please!

  Go to a computer that has Internet access - like this you obviously - post and download the video drivers Acer. Put it on a USB key and bring them to your home computer. Install them. MS - MVP - Elephant Boy computers - don't panic!

• Best laptop and monitor for the post-processing digital image

  Hi all

  I'm looking for advice on my best options for a new Dell laptop and the monitor.

  Main use will be post processing of digital images using DxO 10 and Photoshop CS5.  Other I will use Word, Excel and internet access (for my WordPress web site and blog, the video/TV streaming and others).

  Preliminary research suggests one of the Ultrasharp monitors is probably what I need.  I presume that would be connected via a docking station.  I'm also running backup on an external hard drive.

  Most gifted in computer of friends tell me that my new laptop would have better I7 CPU, the more powerful video card stand-alone capable of handling the laptop sufficiently fast RAM, minimum USB3 ports and a HDMI connection.

  I live in Australia and, of course, need suggestions for templates available there.  My budget is of roughly$ 2,500, but I could go a little higher if there is a compelling reason to do so.  While I do not have a lot of use of computing I am not very computer technical, where my request for advice.

  concerning

  Donny

  Hi Donny54,

  All Ultrasharp monitors works well for you. You will need to make sure that the laptop has a port for an external monitor or a docking station.

  http://pilot.search.Dell.com/Dell%20ultrasharp%20monitors

  You should probably review the XPS laptops.

  http://pilot.search.Dell.com/XPS%20laptops

• Best material for editing?

  I want to upgrade my computer to edit it. I have an iMac 2011: 2,5 GHz, memory 4 GB, AMD Radeon HD 6750 M 512 MB. I plan to buy another iMac. with a budget of $2500, what would you recommend for best performance for editing? I would emphasise quality video card, memory RAM, or disk (4 cores, 7 carrots, fusion, etc...)?

  Download video card with MOST of the vRAM.  That means generally that you will also get the quad core i7 with Turbo Boost technology (acts like one 8 cores when you need it - and presents itself as 8 cores with MenuMeters.) The 2013 iMac had a 'backdoor' easily add RAM, and if this is always the case - buy an extra set of 16G of Crucial or some other 3rd party and add it yourself - you will make savings (if I remember) about $200.  If I had to start everything, I would have also obtained the reader of the merger, but the internal (regular) hard drive in the iMac Gets a pretty decent read/write speed (about 130 MB/s) but not what you really want with video editing. The proposed internal SSD is fairly low, so, I generally recommend external SSD drives and their construction schedules. USB3 is fast. Love at first sight would be better, but it's still expensive. An SSD in USB3 is quite impressive (I get about 300-400 MB/s R/W for one and 370-435 on the other). You can get a USB3 box for $10-$40 (Amazon has a housing Kdlinks now, limited time, for only $9.95!) and you can find a 500 GB SSD for under $ 200 these days. I bought Crucial SSD (I have a little bit o 'too o' Scottish blood in me), but what I've read, the Samsung EVOs are among the fastest (~500MB/s).

  -VRAM so Max it is possible! (- what it takes to get this top of the line card... graphics you have it.) - and lotsa RAM (you can buy 8 with mac + 16 crucial for 24 which will give respectable service) - fast external drives are a nice addition.

• You can use old iMac as a monitor for mini Mac

  You can use 2008 iMac as a monitor for mini Mac?

  No, because the iMac of 2008 not display entered or supported to do so.

  See > use your iMac as a display with the target - Apple Support Display Mode

  You can use a connection network and something like ScreenRecycler

  See > https://www.screenrecycler.com/ScreenRecycler.html

  However, the best bet is to use a regular external monitor with the Mac Mini.

• Recommendation for external monitor for 2009 17 "MBP

  Hi all

  I would like to get an external monitor for the time where a 17 "display is not quite big enough, but is there a limit on the size I can go? And with a 2009 MBP, would be a 4 k screen work?

  The specifications of my MBP is: 17-inch, early 2009, processor Intel Core 2 Duo 2.66 GHz, memory 8 GB 1067 MHz DDR3, NVIDIA GeForce 9400 M 256 MB graphics card

  I'm happy to find an opportunity that A1082 Apple display 23 ", but maybe I would go a little bigger. Used Apple screens are starting to become a bit expensive when there are more than 23 ", so I consider sacrificing the aesthetics of the product and get a monitor not Apple to about 27"... could anyone recommend any specific model?

  I will mostly use the screen for the design work (InDesign) and surf, so that I don't do high range editing, I'd still like the colors to be accurate enough.

  Any help is appreciated!

  Markos

  the resolution maximum support from outside is 2560 by 1600, the resolution of the movie screen 30 inch apple.

• Is CompactRio best solution for me?

  I develop the couple-tour and need to control, hydraulic test machine in addition to saving the graphics of each couple. Control Panel will use the industrial Joystick (to control 5 proportional valves for directional hydraulic) and also requires the adjustment mechanism of pressure/flow (at pressure solenoid control and flow regulators type). Another part is the record - I need to record and report the graphics of each couple, but torque for each individual test values are running user-defined and system should "fire" dump valve very precisely (real time) to the preset torque value (the system will read input load cell) and stop the system once the desired torque is reached. I'll also have in turn against the sensor, sensors etc. of pressure in the system.

  I will definitely use LabView, but I'm not sure whether CompactRIO is the best device for the control and data acquisition in my case or I need something else. I don't know how CompactRIO manages changes to execution and PWM (for the proportional valve controls). Any help will be much appreciated.

  Nash

  
  

• XG270HU freesync flickering monitor and graphics artifacts in 100 120 and 144 Hz

  Hello, just picked up this monitor from Newegg and a bit disappointed. Looks like I might have a defective screen, whenever I pass on the higher refresh rate (100 120, 144 Hz) I get horizontal an audible pop and a line pattern artifacts on the screen at random times. I bought this monitor for the Freesync game so it is a must for me to make it work.

  At 60 Hz, I don't get problems only 100 Hz or more. I tried testing with and without crossfire and and active freesync and still the same issue.

  Here are my system specs:

  I7-3820

  Card mother Intel DX79SR

  PowerColor 3 x 290 x 290 x Radeons (version cooled by water)

  AMD drivers tested:

  15.4.1 beta

  15.4 beta

  14,12 official omega

  It seems that I could work around the problem. It seems that the issue could be around my split primary 290 x GPU display port. Fortunately, my motherboard intel has an option to make any GPU is the primary card without changing the slots (im running the powercolors water cooled) so I did the 2nd primary split GPU via bios and reinstalled the drivers. the graphic issue has now disappeared with the screen plugged into the 2nd split card! I always use tests, but well. no problem even in crossfire mode, it seems that one of my GPU display ports are not at the height.

• Impossible to get good resolution on external monitor for laptop

  I am struggling with this situation of resolution of external monitor for the past two weeks. Since the research I did, it is a very common question; However, I did find a solution. I tried all the solutions have not been successful. I hope someone here can help you.

  Asus K50IJ laptop

  Win 7 Home Premium 64 - Bit SP1

  Intel Core2Duo T6600

  4 GB OF RAM

  Mobile Intel 4 Series Express Chipset Family

  Monitor is Samsung SC750_S24C750P connected with VGA cable (laptop doesn't have a HDMI output)

  I reinstalled the drivers for the graphics card; current driver is 8.15.10.2302 of 11/02/2011

  I reinstalled the drivers for the monitor; current driver is 1.0.0.0 11 13, 2012

  Monitor is currently appearing as "HDMI" in the Device Manager; I have chosen "Analogue" and had the same results. Now & then I see "Generic PnP monitor" in the Device Manager. whenever I see it I uninstall it.

  Bottom line is this: settings keep bouncing everywhere. On rare occasions, I saw the picture I want on the external monitor; When I close the lid on my computer (that's why I bought the external monitor - so I can get a bigger picture, not two), the resolution is 1024 x 768. When I disconnect the external monitor, I get the correct image and ratio 16:9 (1366 x 768) on my laptop screen. When I connect the external monitor I have two choices for the resolution: 800 x 600 or 1024 x 768.

  I went to the Intel graphics properties tool and set a resolution to 1920 x 1080 at 60 Hz - 32 bit - proposed by Samsung for their monitor. Result 7 choices of resolution, no '' recommended '' and the higher tag 1366 x 768. I can live with 1280 x 720; When I choose this resolution or anything higher, the laptop screen is superb, but the image on the external monitor covers 1/4 of the screen - the rest is black. Reset the external monitor doesn't change anything.  Computer restarting does not help. Monitor disconnect/reconnect does not help. I tried this routine dozens of times.

  I really need to use the external monitor, and I need the image proportional. Is there a way to do this?

  Separated from: http://answers.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/Forum/windows_7-hardware/cant-get-right-resolution-on-external-monitor-for/f3680ff9-684c-428E-a6ac-74fe4171a845

  Hi, thanks for the response.

  I saw this on the Intel Web site so I tried mode extended without change.

  If I had 1366 x 768 on both screens, I would have been delighted - instead, I had two choices on my external monitor: 4:3, covering the entire screen with a distorted image, or 16:9 which covers about 40% of the screen.

  The most likely explanation I can think of is that the external monitor 4:3, I used in the past has left a kind of preference file in my computer which could not be changed, so he kept coming back to 4:3 instead of 16:9. I thought the problem might be the VGA - VGA cable, but this does not explain why I was unable to cover the entire screen on my external monitor with something other than a distorted picture.

  Using the past because I was forced to buy a new laptop. As soon as I plugged on the external monitor, everything was perfect.

  Thanks again for your help.

• Best app for the batch processing of photos for the web?

  I would like to know what is the best application for batch processing photos for the web quickly and easily. I'm a web editor and often need to resize, compress, or crop several photos and would like a quick way to configure the basic parameters and processes for example 20 pictures at once. Basically, I'm looking for something with the ability to FastStone Photo Resizer (I'm on a Mac and cannot use FastStone). I remember an once suggested graphic designer LightRoom - would that be a good idea or Adobe has something else? Or maybe not Adobe at all?

  PhotoShop seems heavy for this purpose: it is ideal to make the photo woth that much at the time, but less large to do less with many pictures at once. I know that I can implement some sort of macro-thingie, but I would like to be able to quickly change settings such as the percentage of compression or the width in pixels.

  I don't need a lot of editing tools, mostly just work in pixels, resizing, compression or cropping and save for the web in .jpg and .png - and Mac.

  I hope someone here can guide me in the right direction.

  Hi eval

  I think the best thing for you is Adobe photoshop elements, cover in simple not expensive and all what you want

  Photo Editor software & tools | Adobe Photoshop Elements 14

  concerning