Better Allocation of processor

Similar Questions

• Newbie: Allocation of processors to a virtual machine

  In the allocation of the processors of a computer virtual is there a difference between these two?

  For example I want to allocate 4 processors

  1 socket with 4 cores

  or

  4 Sockets with 1 core

  I tend to allocate 1 socket with 4 cores is this OK?

  I do not think that in general there is a difference, but you will encounter some operating systems have a limit, Win7 will only allow a maximum of 2 Sockets to give Win7 more horse power, you need to add the carrots. Some applications also deal with the sockets and carrots differently so for optimal performance, you can sometimes test different combinations to find what is best.

• Allocation of processor

  I'm still fairly new to VMWare, but we made a couple of deployments.  Recently, we had a customer who tell us that they were talking about another source who said the following about their virtual server SBS 08:

  There are 4 CPU on this machine, this in a physical system is a good idea, but in virtualization is not a good idea unless the equipment is set up for this.  This has to do with the physical cores/processors who need free time on four cores at the moment even for the system to continue in most of the cases.  The load on the virtualized system has great dependencies on how do these systems.

  Can someone explain to me what he's talking about, and if it is correct?  The host in question has 2 Xeon quadcore processors and I allocated 4 virtual to the SBS 2008 Server cpu, because my experience with the machines real SBS is a Devourer of terrible.  If it is correct, what would be the breakdown recommended for this implementation, and how do you determine this?

  Thank you very much to those who can help!

  I hope this helps clarify:

  http://blog.peacon.co.UK/understanding-the-vCPU/

  http://blog.peacon.co.UK

  Please give points for any helpful answer.

• I had to replace my motherboard and processor, now it will not except my vista OS disk because it is a disc of high level

  My mother had crashed so, naturally, I replaced it with a much better and bigger processor, but now it will not except my Vista OS disk because it is a high quality disc.  My question can get just the windows upgrade version 7, or do I have to get the full version?

  You have to buy a complete new installation of Windows 7.

  Upgrade version of Windows 7 is good to upgrade a previous version installed and activated Windows.

• Pavilion dv5-1111ax computer laptop processor AMD RM-74 substitute/replacement/upgrade at level

  The RM-74 processor is fried.  I get the 2 flashing lights all 3-seconds to 1 second.

  I searched the AMD site for the likely replacement candidates and found a number who share the following General charactistics:

  Mode of operation (32 & 64 bit)

  Socket (S1)

  Basic speed (2200 MHz)

  (3600 MHz) system Bus speed

  Power consumption (35W)

  AMD virtualization technology (Yes)

  The processor RM-75 has identical to the RM-74 specifications so wouldn't be of any benefit.

  ZM-82 has a larger memory cache L2 2 MB as opposed to the cache of 1 MB on the RM-74 and 75 CPU.  These 3 CPU have a SELF architecture 65nm and ZM-82 seemed to be a better performer in flow with the larger L2 cache.  Doesn't it?

  2 CPU is AMD Phenom II Triple and quadruple-heart N850 and N970 respectively.  They have a 45nm SOI architecture and a 512 KB L2 cache.

  It would seem that one of these 2 CPU would give me a performance gain as a substitute for the RM-74 failed, but, if this can be a reality in my laptop dv5-111ax?  Would need more robust cooling as well?

  This is the page for HP support for your laptop HP Pavilion dv5-1111ax Entertainment and this is the HP Pavilion dv5 Entertainment PC - Maintenance and Service of Guide for your computer. Based on the service guide, the following processors will work in your system;

  HP p/n 484260-001 - Turion Ultra Dual-Core 35W ZM-86 2.40 GHz processor with 2 MB of L2 cache

  HP p/n 484261-001 - Turion Ultra Dual-Core ZM-82 35W 2.20 GHz processor with 2 MB of L2 cache

  HP p/n 484262-001 - Turion Ultra Dual-Core ZM-80 35W 2.10 GHz processor with 2 MB of L2 cache

  HP p/n 484263-001 - Turion Dual-Core 35W RM-70 2.00 GHz with 1 MB of L2 cache

  HP p/n 484264-001 - Athlon X 2 Dual-Core 35W QL-60 1.90 GHz with 1 MB of L2 cache

  This list is not exhaustive but representative of processors installed by HP. Given that all these CPUS are of the same series/carrot, I highly doubt that the Phenom II Nxxx series processors will work in this model. In theory, plus the model number... the best performance in the series. You should not need a cooling solution better, as all processors are rated at 35 watts TDP.

  Please send Bravo

• Motherboard and processor upgrades

  Is there anyway I can find out what motherboard and processor will be compatible with my laptop Toshiba Satellite Pro L300-1FK and be an upgrade of the original equipment fitted. Toshiba has tried, but they don't want to know. I have the details of the specification for the processor and the motherboard and am looking for advice on where to find the technical information that will tell me what is happening with that without it breaking. Of the spec. sheet I have the motherboard was made by Toshiba and gives the chipset model and relevant details. The processor is an Intel Celeron 585 and once again have all the details of the spec... Have doubled from two to four memory and changed the hard drive for an SSD that has made a big difference in the speeding things up. If I can get just a better motherboard and processor so I'm home and dry. Can anyone help please?

  You should contact Toshiba for this information.  Laptops do not have motherboards standards or processors, so you can't just buy one and put in it, it must be specially designed for your laptop.

• DRS cluster resource allocation and CPU

  Hi all

  I have a question about the allocation of CPU resources to the guests in an environment of DRS. I was under the impression that all physical CPU resources are completely abstract the guest virtual computer. However, I see the following behaviors...

  -J' have a cluster DRS with two ESX hosts ~ 59GHz of the total available CPU resources. Physical ESX host computers have several multicore 2.9 GHz (I don't have practical details right now but that is irrelevant)

  -J' have a linux comments running RHEL 3.0 which seems high on slightly less than 2.9 GHz.

  Now there are a lot of resources of cpu without reserve available to the cluster, but this particular virtual machine can't enter any allocation of processor more than a little less than 2.9 GHz.

  So my question is this: are VMs limited CPU resources to the maximum of available resources to a single physical processor on the host, or must it be able to recover more of the DRS cluster resources? (Assuming a single vCPU guest), I can't seem to find any material that provides black and white if that's the case?

  If an SSN processing power is limited to the total amount of CPU resources of a single physical processor in the host, which is recommended for a machine that requires more CPU resources? Adding an another vCPU (and running vSMP)? I was under the impression that vSMP should be avoided unless a particular SMV workload could truly take advantage of SMP?

  See you soon,.

  Ben

  Well, Yes, each vCPU is limited to the resources of a single processor - there is no aggregate CPU by VM resources.  In the end, son of vCPU of a VM are given for a single CPU.  The only way to improve the performance of the virtual machine, it is just as you wrote - add vCPUs if the guest operating system and applications can use.  The cost is that all threads of vCPU for a virtual computer must be taken together, so if the virtual machine is unable to make their use, the waiting time for this and other virtual machines could increase, degrade their performance of the processor.

  A little more info...  An ESX host has one or more contexts of material performance (SESC).  Each core is a HEC.  Each instance of a CPU hyperthreading is also a HEC.  Thus, for a host with two processors Quad-heart and without hyperthreading, the total number of sesc on the host is eight.  Another example; for a host with two single core processors and each processor supports hyperthreading, the total number of sesc is four.

  Each vCPU uses a HEC.  A virtual machine with two vCPUs will use two sesc.  According to VMware, ESX will try to prioritize different sockets for use of the VM before two hearts on the same socket and before hyperthreading sesc on the same socket.

• AutoCAD 123D Fusion 3.1.2 crashes hard

  AutoCAD has released a beta version of its new (free :-)) CAD program, 123D (http://www.123dapp.com/) which runs on various versions of Windows, including XP.  Requires support "Direct3D".  When it is run on a WinXP VM that it blocks the Fusion and Mac OS X.  Here are the details presented in the 123D beta forum:

  Running 123D (32-bit) in Windows XP (with latest updates) running in a virtual machine on a MacBook Pro Core 2 Duo using Fusion VMwares 3.1.2 (latest rev) and Mac OS X 10.6.7 (later).

  The virtual machine is allocated 2 processors and 2 GB of RAM. 3D acceleration is lit and indicates the following:
  Turn on the 3D graphics for the following virtual machines:
  • Windows XP: DirectX 9 .0c with Shader Model 3 and OpenGL 2.1
  • Windows Vista and Windows 7: DirectX 9.0EX with Aero and OpenGL 2.1

  When I installed 123D, the process paused to upgrade DirectX MS software (which ended normally). 123D installation is completed without error message.

  When I run 123D, I get the window "Get Started!" as indicated in the message from Nick. But when I try to open the sample project, I get a HANG TOUGH! In fact, it's so hard that send a CTRL-ALT-DEL for the VM does nothing. It still freezes the Fusion engine. I struggle to kill the process on Mac OS X. At once, it froze even Mac OS X, and I had to make a stop to hardware and restart! Never (!) who see with any application of Windows XP running on a computer before virtual! I suspect something really deep in the graphic chain - very impressive :-)

  Actually, Mac OS X is probably still run, but the display is frozen, so it's okay.  I had to make a stop on the Mac to recover.

  Did some additional testing with VMware Fusion on my Mac (configuration described above). Modified optimization of the GPU settings in Control Panel > views > settings > advanced > troubleshoot VMware SVGA II (dated from 21/04/2010 to: 11.06.00.0035) virtual driver GPU. There is a slider with 6 settings of all the optimizations to none.

  With the lower settings, 123D complains of insufficient graphic support and does not start. With the higher settings, it crashes. No useful intermediate setting.

  Definitely looks like something VMware needs to address. I'll see if I can get a copy of this thread in a report bug to them. Would be useful if the VMware and AutoCAD teams could collaborate on this one :-)

  I downloaded the DirectX SDK from MS; guess the DirectX diagnostic tool is that it contains.  Will try to do some tests on 123D and Fusion.

  Everyone at VMware has an idea of what's going on here?  All hope of repair? :-)

  Mike

  Glad to hear, thanks for the update =)

• HP Pavilion 22-a113w: No. 22 - a113w card!

  I want to install more RAM (memory) and a better GPU (graphics processor) to my computer and I watched the video and looked for "22-a113w specifications" and nothing came. I would like this issue to be resolved quickly, because I want better performance for playing games.

  Greetings,

  Product of your PC card can be reviewed here.

  You can add more RAM, up to 16 GB.

  Intel graphics card is integrated on the CPU.

  The only way to improve graphics performance is upgraded to the processor.

  This will limit the performance of game and the types of games that you can play with acceptable frame rates.

  See you soon!

• How to reduce the length of loop of HP

  Hello

  I'm running a model with a rate of 5 kHz in a quad core 2 to 2.6 GHz computer.

  If I put in "parallel" run mode model County is growing rapidly but the model rate keeps at 5 kHz.

  Changing the mode of execution of "Low latency" model remains at 0, rate model County goes to 2.5 kHz and increases the number of HP.

  The total allocation of processor of each carrot never passes over 58% in "Low latency" but reached 98% in "parallel".

  I tried several combinations of basic allowances (auto / manual) for loops and model, but the main factor is always to run mode.

  I have observed that, when you use a low latency, the length of loop of HP reached 218000 ns which explains why the model rate drops.

  Is there another setting I can use to leave the system without cost overruns?

  See you soon,.

  Claudio H.

  Hello

  I managed to include optimization during code generation options.

  In the Simulation > Configuration settings > RealTime workshop > NI Configuration > compiler optimizations, I put "To promote a quick code" and got:

  -size of the dll from 452 kb to 404 KB

  -Model occupation CPU loop from 98% to 82%

  -7% to 23% control loop

  -Data loop ranging from 8% to 49%

  -Account template more fast to very slow.

  It seems that now the model works more time and loop control and loop data have more work.

  We will work in the model to make it easier we can.

  See you soon.

• GPU AMD RADEON 7470HD 1 GB GDDR5 vs INTEL HD GRAPHICS 3000

  I just don't understand why the intel 3000 much more better than my discrete graphic card graphic AMD Radeon HD 7470, I use a dynamic mode here and I can simply compare the quality vs high performance thing. A good example is I open and play NBA 2 k 12 and it seems that the Intel HD graphics card gave a lot more 'PERFORMANCE' and 'QUALITY' of the game when I changed my GPU to save energy, even if I change the settings of the graphics card Intel for its 3D preference by fully optimizing the 'QUALITY' to 0% Performance It gives even more performance + QUALITY in my NBA 2 k 12 compared to my Radeon 7470HD I've also changed the 3D settings to much higher Performance of 80% and 20% of quality. I always found kind of GALs of the graph + giving poor quality makes me inconvinient to use.

  Another thing that was when I tried to change my GPU fixed dynamic mode, and this passage from the high-level sport gives less total aprrox. memory of the "dxdiag", he gives only 786 MB when it is in the type of energy-saving, it gives more its total 1 600 MB memory Aprrox.

  IS THIS A PROBLEM FOR MY GPU CARD? I'LL BE HAPPY TO ACCOMMODATE ALL OF YOUR OPNION OF THESE. Thank you!

  Why is your memory Intel more your AMD brief, who knows, I can tell you that in the information---> components---> display system, is my HD 6770 m ~ RAM 1.00 GB (1 073 741 824 bytes) and Intel adapter is ~ bytes of RAM adapter (1,335,959,552), maybe you should check there.

  You can believe me or not (you can take a horse to water, but you can force it to drink) why I believe you get better performance with processors intel compared to the Radeon, this is because the software beast of switching does not work, be said. You don't believe me search this forum you will find enough post where the owners of laptops with switchable graphics are looking for help with graphics there.

  Man, I do not see why you just don't try by yourself, if it doesn't work for some reason, or you still believe that the graphics card intel play better change it back, it's not permanent, there is no reason for you to procrastinate.

  You say that you want to use Intel to play a game and AMD to play another, what's the problem, what you need to do is right click on the desktop and switch from one to the other and vice versa if necessary or is it too difficult for you to understand. You can't play two games together, so I really don't know why you would even mention it.

  FYI the only time where I never use power saving mode is when I am on battery, I have my bet on high performance, really how much money will save you in a year of use of a laptop computer if you switch from high-performance, energy savings depend on what you use your laptop for a little money, not even enough to buy a Merry feast at Mcdonalds?

  Man, I'll tell you once and I'm outside here, being able to save those who the game is crazy, those who build platforms of games can spend hundreds of dollars to purchase blocks of power to get as much power as they can in their computers, because it takes a lot of good gaming power, and energy saving are you talking

• Maximum hard drive size in the Lenovo 3000 N100

  I have Lenovo 3000 N100

  It came with 100 GB hard drive 5400 RPM

  What is the maximum hard disk that can be used. Is it possible to only 5400 RPM or 7200 RPM?

  Thanks for the answer

  Abraham

  No, I'm this based on the Avenue of the planets. Kidding.

  I base this experience with laptops cheaper and lower quality supporting better hard disks, processor, etc. etc.

  Also the fact that some N100 configurations included a 250 GB SATA 5400 RPM hard drive. No reason why will not work a 7200 RPM drive.

  We invite you to seek advice elsewhere.

• Upgrade hp Pavilion a1130n Desktop

  I want to update my old HP pavilion a1130n desktop.  I have a copy of Windows XP Sp3 retail and a BFG GEFORCE 7600 GT OC video card.  A new hard drive 500 GB Seagate sata and new multidrive ANSUS DVD that I used in the office. The old card mother ver120 of MS-7093 went bad (increased power), that I want to install a new and better motherboard and processor. What mother/CPU card I can that will be compatible with the above components and work with WIN XP SP3? The case I believe to be a Micro ATX. I also intend to get a power superior power suppy that will support the necessary components. Any suggestions or advice are appreciated.

  This will be my last comment. Your existing WINDOWS XP is not valid with any other motherboard.   Go to a flea market!  It is easy to buy an office fully working XP for $150. Then add your extra parts.  Otherwise, your problems will worsen.

  You will need to purchase an OEM (download, then burn to DVD) version of WIN XP and then course all Service Packs.   Minimum cost OEM $45.  It does not come with a driver CD. You need to FIND for the motherboard. Is not a task for a novice.

• COMPAQ CQ60-111EM update/change cpu to improve more quickly

  Hi I have a compaq laptop cq60 111em and it has its origin 2 GHz celeron 575 cpu core and for me his looks too slow. and I want to know what cpu I can put in it I want dual core cpu but I want better and faster processor to put in. can someone tell me what cpu I can put in it? Thank you.

  Hello

  A list of compatible processors and the replacement procedure can be found from Page 85 of your & Maintenance Guide.

  Kind regards

  DP - K

• Flow of firepower of ASA

  Hi guys,.

  I noticed of Palo Alto and other sellers specify a much higher rate for their new generation compared to Cisco solution, when they make the full filtering URL, antivirus and anti-spam protection

  I think it's because they treat the package in parallel where ASA he treats one by a single module, is that correct?

  For example, ASA a past traffic to URL filtering, then Spam and then...

  Where as Palo Alto passes to the URL and SPam and... all at once so achieve a significantly higher flow rate.

  on this basis, it is correct to say that Cisco may not be the dealer in this area due to how they manage the firepower?

  I think the best way to address this issue is using NSS Labs reports. They publish an annual report which includes a chart to see how much you pay by protected Mbit/sec. Given that the supplier has published performance data are not always correct that you can watch their conclusions.

  I don't know if you're talking about absolute return (e.g. 7080 PAN vs FP9300), but in case you do I would say looking at the relative numbers and check what bitrate you lose by using for example the IPS.

  Architecture: hardware wise performance will always beat the software. FPGA used for specific loads occur always better than generic processors. Parallel processing is not something that each salesperson makes. Try to not get lost in the marketing of buzz and just analyze the performance counters and see how they compare when it comes to price - at the end of the day an architecture that results in better performance of 10%, but 100% higher price might not be what you're looking for.