Build an array of object?

Similar Questions

• CF9 ORM relational mapping + Flash Builder 4 nested value objects errors

  Hi all

  I tried to use relational mapping ORM in ColdFusion 9 and combine this with Flash Builder Beta 2 to manipulate the data. What I have are a two simple tables that contains 3 columns each:

  Table properties:

  ID (primary key)

  PropertyName (data)

  Tenants (unique id)

  Table of tenants:

  ID (primary key)

  TenantName (data)

  TenantID (unique identification number)

  And two cfc for each table.

  CFC of tenants:

  <cfcomponent persistent="true" table="Tenants"  schema="dbo" output="false">
       <!---- properties ---->
       
       <cfproperty name="ID" column="ID" type="numeric" ormtype="int" fieldtype="id"  /> 
       <cfproperty name="TenantName" column="TenantName" type="string" ormtype="string"  />
          <cfproperty name="TenantID" column="TenantID" type="numeric" ormtype="int" />
       
  </cfcomponent> 
  
   
  

  CFC property:

  <cfcomponent persistent="true" table="Properties"  schema="dbo" output="false">
       <!---- properties ---->
       
       <cfproperty name="ID" column="ID" type="numeric" ormtype="int" fieldtype="id"  /> 
       <cfproperty name="PropertyName" column="PropertyName" type="string" ormtype="string"  />
       
       <!---- relation ---->
       <cfproperty name="Tenants"
                      fieldtype="one-to-many"
                      singularname="Tenant"
                      cfc="Tenants"
                      mappedby="Tenants"
                      fkcolumn="TenantID" 
                      lazy="false" 
                      type="array"
                                  <!--- can be array or struct --->  
                      <!---structkeytype="int" structkeycolumn="ID"--->
                      />
       
  </cfcomponent> 
  

  And i test to see how the data comes back with this:

  test. CFML

  <cfset ormReload()>
  <cfset properties = entityLoad('Properties')>
  <cfdump var = "#properties#" />
  

  The result is such that it is supposed to be; I get an array of property objects filled with all the data and the property of tenants filled with an array of objects of tenants. The problem occurs when I try to load the data using the flash builder via a service using RemoteObject.

  Flex app:

  protected function loadRawData(e:MouseEvent):void {
                      var ro:RemoteObject = new RemoteObject();
                      ro.source = 'cfcs.DataTest.PropertiesService';
                      ro.destination = 'ColdFusion';
                      
                      ro.addEventListener( ResultEvent.RESULT, onRawDataResult );
                      ro.addEventListener( FaultEvent.FAULT, onRawDataFault );
                      ro.getAllProperties();
                 }
  

  Flex load all the data it is supposed except for tenants. The debugger wrote a message saying that I would not convert [@ea36699] to mx.collections.ArrayCollection. I also tried with a generator of ORM in ColdFusion Builder, and then adding the service via the Data/Services Panel in Flash Builder. Tried to click-right-how the Test works on getAllProperties (): [Properties] the test passes and everything is working properly.

  It could be something really really small miss me him but I can't understand it please help! Thanks in advance!

  I struggled with this for hours a few weeks back.  Add the remotingfetch = "true" attribute to your relationship like this:

                                            />
  

  I hope this helps!

• FGV VI within the class method called the array of objects in a for loop

  I have an array of objects connected to the loop for I call the VI method on the object in the loop for. If the method uses/calls some VI with state/memory (such as FGV) State is shared for each method call in a loop despite the called VI is reentrant preallocated. Someone knows how to fix this?

  NVM. I found an answer:

  https://lavag.org/topic/19014-dynamic-dispatch-shared-reentrancy/

• Build an array of values of the difference

  Dear members,

  With reference to the attached LabVIEW 2010 Student Edition file...

  From the incoming data via the .csv "Reading of the spreadsheet", I want to display a picture of the difference between the n and n-1 data value if the data set is 10, 20, 25, 35, 50, then the difference will be 10, 5, 10, 15.

  I used the "Index Array" function to extract the n and n - 1 values (using the function 'Simulation' as the incrementer line index) however I can't find the way to build an array of these difference values and display them in the façade, which is

  10

  5

  10

  15

  It will probably be a trivial problem for more experienced LabVIEW programmers.  Advice or assistance is welcome.

  Kind regards

  Since you have 1 column of 800 lines, then use table to Index first to get only the first column.  This will give you a table 1 d of 800 items.  Then the idea to use this table, as well as the subset of the table for the 2nd through the remaining lines, subtract one from the other, work.

  I can't comment on the simulation loops because I don't have that and never used.

  

• What is the best way to save an array of objects and then load it?

  Hi, what is the best way to save and load an array of objects?

  I hade a code like that, but it does not work:

  var test = new Array();
  test.push(new Foo("a"));
  for (var i = 0; i < test.length; i++) {
      console.log(test[i]);
  }
  // save and load, then show again
  localStorage.setItem("test", test);
  var test2 = localStorage("test");
  for (var i = 0; i < test2.length; i++) {
      console.log(test2[i]);
  }
  

  the problem is, the first newspaper that get the things I want. The second time I get:

  Uncaught TypeError: Property 'localStorage' of object [object Object] is not a function
  

  The work around this problem is to stringify before saving and then analyze before loading.

  http://StackOverflow.com/a/2010948/773263

  Although I said, it is better to use IndexDB.

• How to upgrade an array of objects?

  Dear friends,

  I have a number of objects stored in a table.
  It seems that the table does not point to objects, but has copies.
  The element of the array is only updated with the notation table [index] prop, not with the object.prop notation.

  It would be possible to always use the prop table [index] notation for an update of the issues, but I want to understand why the other method does not work. And of course, there should be no copy...

  var objArray = [oObject0, oObject1, oObject2];    
  
  function oObjTpl (name, scheme, start, incr, current, decimals, items) { // 'prototype' definition
    this.Name =       name;
    this.Scheme =     scheme;                       // numermic | roman | ROMAN | text
    this.Start =      start;                        // start value
    this.Incr =       incr;                         // increment, may be a formula string
    this.Current =    current;                      // Last inserted value or item
    this.Decimals =   decimals;                     // relevant only for numeric scheme
    this.Items =      items;                        // array of list items, relevant only for text scheme
  }
  
  var items0 = ["one","two", "three", "four", "five", "six", "zz", "seven", "eight", "nine", "ten"]; 
  var oObject0 = new oObjTpl ('CountingEN', 'text',     1,  1, undefined, undefined, items0);
  var oObject1 = new oObjTpl ('oObject1',  'numeric', 17, -1, undefined,         0, undefined);
  var oObject2 = new oObjTpl ('oObject2',  'roman',    1,  1, undefined,         0, undefined);
  
  // replace the zz by soemething else
  oObject0.Items[6] = "AAAA";       // this does not update objArray
  $.writeln (objArray[0].Items);
  
  objArray[0].Items[6] = "BBBB";    // this updates objArray
  $.writeln (objArray[0].Items);
  
  oObject0.Items[6] = "CCCC";       // update of objArray effective in next run
  $.writeln (objArray[0].Items);
  

  When you run the script 3 times, I get this console output:

  one,two,three,four,five,six,zz,seven,eight,nine,ten
  one,two,three,four,five,six,BBBB,seven,eight,nine,ten
  one,two,three,four,five,six,BBBB,seven,eight,nine,ten
  Result: undefined
  one,two,three,four,five,six,CCCC,seven,eight,nine,ten
  one,two,three,four,five,six,BBBB,seven,eight,nine,ten
  one,two,three,four,five,six,BBBB,seven,eight,nine,ten
  Result: undefined
  one,two,three,four,five,six,CCCC,seven,eight,nine,ten
  one,two,three,four,five,six,BBBB,seven,eight,nine,ten
  one,two,three,four,five,six,BBBB,seven,eight,nine,ten
  Result: undefined
  

  Thank you Apollo, but this has not been around.

  But I found that the order of definitions is crucial here. The following works as it should:

  function oSeries (name, scheme, start, incr, current, decimals, items) { // 'prototype' definition
    this.Name =       name;
    this.Scheme =     scheme;                       // numermic | roman | ROMAN | text
    this.Start =      start;                        // start value
    this.Incr =       incr;                         // increment, may be a formula string
    this.Current =    current;                      // Last inserted value or item
    this.Decimals =   decimals;                     // relevant only for numeric scheme
    this.Items =      items;                        // array of list items, relevant only for text scheme
  //return this;      // ahs no effect
  }
  
  var items0 = ["one","two", "three", "four", "five", "six", "zz", "seven", "eight", "nine", "ten"];
  var oSeries_0 = new oSeries ('CountingEN', 'text',     1,  1, undefined, undefined, items0);
  var oSeries_1 = new oSeries ('oSeries_1',  'numeric', 17, -1, undefined,         0, undefined);
  var oSeries_2 = new oSeries ('oSeries_2',  'roman',    1,  1, undefined,         0, undefined);
  
  var aSeries = [oSeries_0, oSeries_1, oSeries_2];    
  
  var a1 = aSeries[2].Scheme;      // roman
  $.writeln (a1);
  
  // replace the zz by octogon
  oSeries_0.Items[6] = "AAAA";   // this does not update aSeries
  $.writeln (aSeries[0].Items);
  
  aSeries[0].Items[6] = "BBBB";  // this updates aSeries
  $.writeln (aSeries[0].Items);
  
  oSeries_0.Items[6] = "CCCC";   // update of aSeries effective in next run
  $.writeln (aSeries[0].Items);
  /*
  one,two,three,four,five,six,AAAA,seven,eight,nine,ten
  one,two,three,four,five,six,BBBB,seven,eight,nine,ten
  one,two,three,four,five,six,CCCC,seven,eight,nine,ten
  */
  

  The order is now: implement the objects and then set up the array of objects.

• Arrays are objects — really?

  Dear experts and gurus,

  More I read the more I am confused. Every now and then the talk is "JS arrays are objects and where they are passed by reference. However, simple experiences leave my perplexed: it is the same as for light (depending on the view, it behaves as waves or particles):

  gaSomething = ["a","b", "c"];
  Update (gaSomething);
  alert (gaSomething.join("\n"));         // the global array has changed
  
  DeleteItem (gaSomething, "7");
  alert (gaSomething.join("\n"));         // the global array has not changed
  
  function Update (array) {
    for (var j= 0; j < 9; j++) {
      array.push(j+1); 
    }
  }
  
  function DeleteItem (array, item) {
    var index = IsInArray (array, item);
    var lower = array.slice (0, index);   // lower part
    var upper = array.slice (index+1);    // upper part
    var locArray    = lower.concat(upper);
    array = locArray;                     // transfer data
  alert ("in DeleteItem:\n" + array.join("\n"));
  }
  

  
  The only safe assumption is that JS arrays are not treated like objects and are therefore passed by value. It is so difficult to implement functions to remove items from several bays: for each table a separate function is necessary!

  Any ideas for a general DeleteItem function?

  Hi Klaus,

  It's very dangerous!

  1 array.length = array.length - 1 means: remove the last item in an array

  Array.Length = array.length - 5 removes the last 5 items in a table

  Delete array [index] Deletes only the VALUE of the element.

  When you sort, it's the end of the array and so you have managed to delete.

  My code in my last post IS WRONG:

  It must be:

  1. for (var j = 9; > 5; j - j) {}
  2. Array.Slice (j, 1);
  3. }

  However, I want to remove an item in the table. Unfortunately, there is no function of welding in'RE...

  It's slice - do Splice not!

  Need to remove reverse items.

  Try this function. It removes 3 and 2 points

  function DeleteItem (array, index)
  {
   $.writeln(array);
   for (var j=3 ; j > 1; j --)
      {
      $.writeln("delete: " + array[j]);
      array.splice(j,1);
      $.writeln(array);
      }  
  
  }
  

• An array of objects with a filling loop. Noob PHP question.

  Hey guys,.

  You are all such a great help! Here's another one for you, the simple code below should create an array of objects of pizza (and it does) then display each item in the order. However... each object in the table seems to inherit the properties of everything what was the last item entered for a reason any.

  Copy the following code:

  <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
  <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
  <head>
  <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
  <title>Untitled Document</title>
  </head>
  <?php
  class pizza{
            public $price;
            public $description;
            public $name;
  }
  
  
  
  
  $menu2=fopen("pizzaMenu2.txt","r") or exit("System Error!");
  $pizzas = array();
  $arraypos=0;
  
  //This loop does all of the READING and populating of variables
  while(!feof($menu2))
    {
              //First get the array position
                                $arraypos = (int)fgets($menu2);
  
            //Then Put in Title in title2 array
                                $pizzas[$arraypos2] = new pizza(0,0,0);
                                $pizzas[$arraypos2]->title = fgets($menu2);
                                $pizzas[$arraypos2]->description = fgets($menu2);
                                $pizzas[$arraypos2]->price = fgets($menu2);
    } //End of reading loop
  
  
  //begin writing data
  $arraypos=1;
  while ($arraypos <=3){
            echo "the array is in position: ".$arraypos;
            echo "<br />";
            echo $pizzas[$arraypos2]->title;
            echo "<br />";
            echo $pizzas[$arraypos2]->description;
            echo "<br />";
            echo $pizzas[$arraypos2]->price;
            echo "<br />";
            $arraypos++;
  }//end of writing data loop
  
  fclose($menu2);
  ?>
  <body>
  </body>
  </html>
  
  

  This returns:

  the array is in position: 1
  Test Pizza Two 
  The same as one with an extra one, yum! 
  22.99
  the array is in position: 2
  Test Pizza Two 
  The same as one with an extra one, yum! 
  22.99
  the array is in position: 3
  Test Pizza Two 
  The same as one with an extra one, yum! 
  22.99
  

  When it should return this:

  the array is in position: 1
  Test pizza One 
  Loaded with all that test pizza goodness! Lots and lots of ones 1111! 
  11.99 
  the array is in position: 2
  Test Pizza Two 
  The same as one with an extra one, yum! 
  22.99
  the array is in position: 3
  Test Threeza! 
  Do you see what I did there? I added a three to pizza, hahaha, I am so punny. 
  33.33 
  

  using the following text file pizzaMenu2.txt:

  1
  Test pizza One
  Loaded with all that test pizza goodness! Lots and lots of ones 1111!
  11.99
  3
  Test Threeza!
  Do you see what I did there? I added a three to pizza, hahaha, I am so punny.
  33.33
  2
  Test Pizza Two
  The same as one with an extra one, yum!
  22.99
  
  

  Now, I did line-by-line analysis and showed that the values are entered in the objects in the appropriate table, but everything that happens ultimately crushes all other objects, so ultimately, I have 3 objects in my table which are all the same. I don't know what I'm missing here.

  $pizzas [$arraypos2]

  must be:

  $pizzas [$arraypos]

• Power supply an array of objects returned by a remote object using AMFPHP remote procedure calls.

  Hi guys,.

  I'm working on an AIR Application that uses Flex Remoting AMFPHP, the data type returned is an array of objects that contains a shot of a url to an image on the server, how to link it to a tilelist component, so I have a list with images representing the icons and the string representing the Tilelist labels?

  We assume that the object has these fields:

  -label
  -image

  Thus, you can first pass the array to the dataProvider of the TileList and make an ItemRenderer (with a label and an image). Then, in the ItemRenderer, go to the fields with the data objects:

  ItemRenderer.mxml

• Place an array of objects on stage

  I'm trying to place an array of objects to a scene where they fall vertically. I was able to do by placing the array objects in an object called 'bag' but have found that the object of the bag contains the object id last table I can not apply actions various one-dimensional array objects.

  Also my objects don't loop and appear only once.

  Here's the code to date.

  var tempArray:Array = new Array(); Values of randomized stores

  var bagArray:Array = new Array ("gslow_id", "gshigh_id", "glow_id", "ghigh_id", "gdiv_id",

  'gcall_id', 'gbust_id', 'gbull_id', 'gboom_id', 'gbear_id'); List of names of bag

  function createBags() {}

  if (tempArray.length == 0) {/ / check if the table is empty}

  for (var i: Number = 0; i < target; i ++) {/ / loop - creat variable bagName to the value of the target}

  var bagName: String = bagArray [i];

  var depthLevel:Number = this.getNextHighestDepth ();

  / / movies, set in the time line

  this.attachMovie (bagName, bagName, depthLevel, {_x:random (350) + 100, _y:random (0) + spacing});

  += 45 spacing;

  tempArray.push (bagName);

  / / trace (tempArray);

  bag = _root [bagName]; create an object of the bag containing the variable bagName

  trace (bag);

  bag.onEnterFrame = function() {}

  If (this ._x < 570 & & this ._y > 0) {}

  this ._y += speed * random (8);

            } else {

  this ._x = random (500);

  } / / end if (this ._x < 570 & & this ._y > 0)

  } / / end bag.onEnterFrame)

  bag.onPress = function() {}

  / / if the bag is pressed selection action

  //trace (bag);

  xPos = this ._x

  yPos = this ._y

  unloadMovie (this);

  score += 1000

  scoreText_txt.text = score;

  / / trace (score);

  checkScore();

  { } / / end bag.onPress)

  / / trace (targets);

  / / trace (bagName);

  { } / / end for (var i: Number = 0; i < target; i ++)

  { } / / end if (tempArray.length == 0)

  } / / End createBags()

  Try:

  var bagA:Array = [];

  var bagArray:Array = new Array ("gslow_id", "gshigh_id", "glow_id", "ghigh_id", "gdiv_id",

  'gcall_id', 'gbust_id', 'gbull_id', 'gboom_id', 'gbear_id'); List of names of bag

  function createBags() {}

  If (tempArray.length == 0) {/ / check if the table is empty}

  for (var i: Number = 0; i< targets;="" i++)="" {="" for="" loop="" -="" creat="" variable="" bagname="" to="" the="" value="" of="">

  var bagName: String = bagArray [i];

  var depthLevel:Number = this.getNextHighestDepth ();

  tie movies to the time line

  bag of the var: MovieClip = this.attachMovie (bagName, bagName, depthLevel, {_x:random (350) + 100, _y:random (0) + spacing});

  bagA.push (bag);

  spacing = 45;

  trace (bag);

  bag.onEnterFrame = function() {}

  If (this ._x < 570="" &&="" this._y=""> 0) {}

  This speed of += ._y * random (8);

  } else {}

  This ._x = random (500);

  } / / end if (this ._x < 570="" &&="" this._y=""> 0)

  } / / end bag.onEnterFrame)

  bag.onPress = function() {}

  If the bag is pressed selection action

  trace (bag);

  PosX = this ._x

  yPos = this ._y

  unloadMovie (this);

  score += 1000

  scoreText_txt.text = result;

  trace (score);

  checkScore();

  } / / end bag.onPress)

  trace (targets);

  trace (bagName);

  } / / end for (var i: Number = 0; i< targets;="">

  } / / end if (tempArray.length == 0)

  } / / End createBags()

• indexOf() function for search object. &lt; property &gt; in an array of objects

  Hello world!
  OK, I know that the subject of this sounds a little awkward wire, with an example, it will be much clearer.
  I have a series of tables that contain strings, now named "label"; These tags can only produce only once in each table (which is therefore a 'set' of the mathematical definition of 'package', tags), but more than one table may contain a given tag (intersections of the sets are not always zero).
  I want to write a function that goes through all the tags in all tables and counties, which gives the result in a separate table called tag_counter that contains the objects of the tag. A tag object contains two fields: 'value', which is the tag itself, and 'events', which takes account of the time the tag was found.
  The function logic is simple: for each table, cycle all its labels. If the tag already exists in the tag_counter table, increment the counter 1; If not, add a new entry in the table with the given tag tag_counter. The line in bold-italics is exactly in the place of my question, because I don't know how to search within an array of objects by a property of such an object. Here is the code:

  private function harvest_tags(dt:DataTable):Array {
      var tag_counter:Array = new Array();
      
      for each(var site_feeds:Object in dt.data) {    //cycle through the Arrays
          for each(var tag:String in site_feeds.t) {  //cycle through the tags
              if(tag == '') continue;     //in case an empty tag is found, skip it
              tag = tag.replace(',', ''); //strip commas
              var i:int = tag_counter.indexOf(tag); //this needs fixing!
              if(i != -1) {
                  tag_counter[i].occurrences++;
               }
              else {
                   tag_counter.push(new Tag(tag));
               }
           }
       }
  
       tag_counter.sortOn("occurrences", Array.NUMERIC | Array.DESCENDING);
       return tag_counter;
  }
  

  and the class of tag definition:

  public class Tag {
          private var value:String;
          public var occurrences:Number;
          
          public function Tag(value:String) {
              this.value = value;
              this.occurrences = 1;
          }
  }
  

  Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Andrea

  I think you want to use a hash table.  The object class is often used for this.  It is much faster than searching for an array of strings.

  private void harvest_tags(dt:DataTable):Array {}

  var tag_counter:Object = new Object();

  for each (var site_feeds:Object in dt.data) {//cycle through the berries

  for each (var: string tag in site_feeds.t) {//cycle by tags

  if(tag == '') continue;     where is an empty tag, pop it

  tag = tag.replace (',', "); Strip commas

  If (tag_counter [tag])

  tag_counter [tag] ++;

  on the other

  tag_counter [tag] = 1;

  }

  }

  var tag_array:Array = new Array();

  for {(var p:String in tag_counter)

  var tagObj:Tag = new Tag (p);

  tagObj.occurences = tag_counter [p];

  }

  Alex Harui

  Flex SDK Developer

  Adobe Systems Inc..

  Blog: http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui

• Array of objects display BPM with JSP HOWTO

  Hello!
  
  Could someone please tell me, how to list the elements of an array of objects BPM with JSP? The object has attributes, and I do not know the length of the array in advance, so I would need some kinf of loop.
  
  I have not found any documentation or forum thread on this subject, and I'm out of ideas.
  
  Thanks for any help!

  Hello

  Please find the code below. Hope this code will help you

  <% int count = 0; %>
  
                      
       
       
       
       
       <% count++ ; %>
  

  Sidonie

• Insert references VI in an empty array of objects

  Hi all

  I shopped, but I can't seem to find the answer to this particular question.

  Platform: TestStand 4.2.0 LabVEW 8.6.1.  Customer resists upgrade.

  I am trying to build a list of VI references to a variable of TestStand.  TS is an empty array of references to object called Step.VI_References.

  BT, I take the context of the sequence (from "ThisContext") and read it as an object of property.  I then take this reference and use it with search GetPropertyObject Step.VI_References.  I have a table of references VI (of type TS. PropertyObject) that I am an iteration more to extract each reference.  It is then to be inserted by using SetPropertyObjectByOffset.  See the attached picture for the relevant bit of code.

  My problem is I'm getting an error-17300 - essentially a "NULL pointer unexpected shipping reference" SetPropertyObjectByOffset call - even with just a reference to be inserted.

  It doesn't seem to be a mistake to place else, but whenever I try to access VI_References in table form (using any table API), it gives the same error.

  What obvious (or subtle) thing I'm missing?

  Thank you

  Geoff

  If these are references, you must use SetValInterfaceByOffset instead of SetPropertyObjectByOffset.

  Hope this helps,

  -Doug

• Build an array of clips

  Hello

  I have a main document class and a class array (among others).

  I don't know how to build the table however. Here is my attempt so far. But I get the following error code.

  TypeError: Error #1009: cannot access a property or method of a null object reference.

  to LetterArray / initLetters)

  at LetterArray()

  BugGoopFSGame() //This is my main document class.

  What I am doing wrong?

  Thank you

  Images of recommended

  in the main document class

  public var letterArray:LetterArray = new LetterArray (internship);

  in the array class

  package

  {

  import flash.display.MovieClip;

  import flash.events.Event;

  import flash.events.MouseEvent;

  import flash.display.Stage;

  SerializableAttribute public class extends MovieClip LetterArray

  {

  private var _stage:Stage;

  / * Here are video clips that need to go in a table so that they can be handled together.

  Classes A, F, G, H, I, N, O, S and T were created all dynamically by flash.*.

  Do I still need these here?

  public var a:;

  public var f: F;

  public var g:G;

  public var h:H;

  public var i: I;

  public var n: n;

  public var o: O;

  public var changement;

  public var t:T;

  public void LetterArray(s:Stage)

  {

  several = stage;

  initLetters();

  }

  private function initLetters (): void

  {

  var LetterArray:Array = new Array (a, f, g, h, i, n, o, s, t);

  }

  remains irrelevant

  }

  }

  You declare a bunch of objects, but you do not instaintiate them.

  public var a:;  declare but do not yet exist

  public var a: A = new A();   declared and there are

• build an array with 2 values assigned to 1 dimension

  I am wanting to build a 1 d array where the two values are assigned to each dimension.  For example:

  Index 0 would have a 1 and 4 are attributed to him

  Index of 1 would have a 2 and 3 which are entrusted

  Index 2 could make a 0 and 1 that are entrusted to him.

  So can I unbundle the arrayand grab the two les deux valeurs values of index 0, index 1, etc...  I want to put this inside a control of the typedef table.  Is this possible?

  What is the meaning of the index 0 vs 1 against 2?  What is the significance of 1 and 4 for index 0?  2 and 3 for 1 index? ....

  It could certainly be a 2D array.  The line index would be the equivalent of your current 0, 1, 2 indices.  The column index would be the equivalent of the if you want 1 or 4 or 2 vs 3.

  That's all just a matter of how you want to extract data out of the data structure and pass it to your other duties, such as Fieldpoint DAQmx, a façade, a text file...  If it is a 2D array, you can use the index picture, to get a line, column, or a specific line and column item.  If this is a cluster, you can use the index table to get your line, unbundling for the first or the second product off the part of the cluster.

  What data structure is the best one to use really depends on what you're trying to do with the data.  You want two numbers?  Do you want a number and a Boolean value?  You will need to figure out which is best for your application.