Calls from [email protected] / * / ip addresses

Hello world

I get calls from [email protected] / * / IPS on my Highway VCS trying to dial different numbers. I activated a policy rule of local call to reject asterisk@.* to any destination. * but it does not work and I still get the call attempts.

Someone has encountered this and knows how to stop these calls?

Thank you

Maciek

Maciej,

try to replace 'origin' with 'non-authenticated-origin' in your CPL, so that it reads as follows:

CPL 'origin' field has a value of "is not far" If the message that the CPL is run for is not authenticated.

You can find more information about the field of the 'non-authenticated-origin"in the VCS administration guide.

Hope this helps,

Andreas

Tags: Cisco Support

Similar Questions

  • SMTP: MAIL FROM: [email protected] / * / blocks / expires

    First of all, I'm not a customer of Cisco, but a user of a network by a facility of PIX firewall. My username does not mean that I am affiliated with Cisco; It's just a way for me to remember it.

    I can't give you more details than the fact that there is a PIX protecting the network. I don't have its version number, unfortunately.

    In any case, here's the deal: I think that there is a bug in the way PIX handles SMTP sessions. Specifically, it seems to block/time out when I Specifies an address (MAIL FROM or RCPT TO) that contains a pipe character, ' | '.

    Some tests:

    (1) mail via localhost: no problem

    (2) mail via the internal host: no problem (no not a firewall)

    (3) mail via the external host: has a problem, but not systematically

    The interesting part is that the bug does not always occur. When I RCPT TO: [email protected]/ * / directly, everything stops and the connection times out. However, if I first RCPT TO: [email protected] / * / and subsequently, * in the same SMTP session *, RCPT TO: [email protected]/ * / he * is * working. Rather peculiar.

    Relevant sessions (with netcat):

    > [email protected] / * /: ~ $ nc firewalled.example.org smtp

    > 220 firewalled.example.org ESMTP Sendmail 8.12.10/8.11.4; Friday 20 August 2004 11:50:30 + 0200

    > HELO example.org

    > 250 firewalled.example.org Hello [213.196.33.33], the pleasure to meet you

    > MAIL FROM: [email protected] / * /

    > 250 2.1.0 [email protected] / * /... Sender OK

    > RCPT TO: [email protected]/ * /.

    My orders starts with a ">", responses from the server with ' > '. As you can see, nothing happens after the RCPT TO command with a ' | '.

    > [email protected] / * /: ~ $ nc firewalled.example.org smtp

    > 220 firewalled.example.org ESMTP Sendmail 8.12.10/8.11.4; Friday 20 August 2004 11:51:13 + 0200

    > HELO example.org

    > 250 firewalled.example.org Hello [213.196.33.33], the pleasure to meet you

    > MAIL FROM: [email protected] / * /

    > 250 2.1.0 [email protected] / * /... Sender OK

    > RCPT TO: [email protected] / * /

    > 250 2.1.5 [email protected] / * /... Recipient OK

    > DATA

    > 354 enter mail, end with "." on a line by itself

    > Subject: test 2 [email protected] / * /

    > .

    > 2.0.0 250 i7K9pD9i022438 Message accepted for delivery

    > MAIL FROM: [email protected] / * /

    > 250 2.1.0 [email protected] / * /... Sender OK

    > RCPT TO: [email protected]/ * /.

    > 250 2.1.5 [email protected]/ * /... Recipient OK

    > DATA

    > 354 enter mail, end with "." on a line by itself

    > Subject: [email protected]test *.

    > .

    > 2.0.0 250 i7K9pD9j022438 Message accepted for delivery

    > QUIT

    > 221 2.0.0 firewalled.example.org closing connection

    The first RCPT is to [email protected] / * / and works very well. Then, after the opinion of "message accepted", I begin a new mail and RCPT TO [email protected]/ * / * fact * work.

    Is this a bug in the software PIX itself? Network administrators say they have no special rules put in place and suggest that I just have to use an address without a ' | '. The problem is that requires change of address confirmation e-mails, but they never get through. In addition, the syntax of the address is valid.

    Anyone can shed light on this issue? You can reproduce it on your installation?

    Nice analysis... maybe you should work with the PIX a little more.

    In this case, however, no bug in the PIX (except that we through sometimes by your remark above). This behavior is specified. Of http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_sw/v_63/config/fixup.htm#wp1103507

    "The MAIL and RCPT commands specify who is the sender and the recipient of the mail. The e-mail addresses are analysed for strange characters. The pipeline character (|) is removed (replaced by a white space) and "<" ‚"="">" are allowed if they are used to define an e-mail address ("' >" "must be preceded of '")<>

    There was some talk to the command pipelinig user definable, but at this time, no final word.

    Sorry for the trouble.

    Scott

  • [Email protected] call blocking *.

    I see a lot of sip calls on my VCSe where [email protected] / * / ip ADDRESS or [email protected] / * / OR [email protected] / * /

    I was looking through the forums and found

    https://supportforums.Cisco.com/message/3401571#3401571

    Source Destination Protocol duration status Peer Type shares at start

    2013-11-15 12:26:27 sip:[email protected] / * / sip:[email protected] / * / <->SIP SIP 32 seconds 408 / Request Timeout view local VCS

    2013-11-15 12:26:23 sip:[email protected] / * / sip:[email protected] / * / <->SIP SIP 32 seconds 408 / Request Timeout view local VCS

    2013-11-15 12:26:20 sip:[email protected] / * / sip:[email protected] / * / <->SIP SIP 32 seconds 408 / Request Timeout view local VCS

    2013-11-15 12:26:16 sip:[email protected] / * / sip:[email protected] / * / <->SIP SIP 32 seconds 408 / Request Timeout view local VCS

    2013-11-15 12:26:13 sip:[email protected] / * / sip:[email protected] / * / <->SIP SIP 32 seconds 408 / Request Timeout view local VCS

    2013-11-15 12:06:56 sip:[email protected] / * / sip:[email protected] / * / <->SIP SIP 32 seconds 408 / Request Timeout view local VCS

    2013-11-15 12:00:53 sip:[email protected] / * / sip:[email protected] / * / <->SIP SIP 33 seconds 408 / Request Timeout view local VCS

    2013-11-15 11:05:26 sip:[email protected] / * / sip:[email protected] / * / <->SIP SIP 32 seconds 408 / Request Timeout view local VCS

    2013-11-15 10:14:14 sip:[email protected] / * / sip:[email protected] / * / <->SIP/SIP 32 seconds 408 / Request Timeout view local VCS

    2013-11-15 10:08:32 sip:[email protected] / * / sip:[email protected] / * / <->SIP SIP 32 seconds 408 / Request Timeout view local VCS

    It's my current CPL

    I now would change to:

    "http://www.Tandberg.net/Cpl-extensions" xmlns: xsi = "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi: schemaLocation = "urn: ietf:params:xml:ns:cpl cpl.xsd" > "

    "" [email protected] / * / "destination =". * » >

    "" [email protected] / * / "destination =". * » >

    Is THIS CORRECT?

    It'll work, but you should have the two unathenticated and authenticated covered calls.

    Given that all your calls seems to come from @VCS_IP, then you can block all destinations by using * instead of specifying the address. Below is part of the CPL I use and it works for me.

    You can test if the CPL works or not using the VCS-E "tool to locate."

    In addition, you must disable SIP UDP on the VCS-E unless you really need, as these scanners use UDP to find potential targets.

    (Time only I had to re-activate if I have to make a call using the host name where the VCS-E did a search of A DNS record instead of using "normal" SRV records.)

    If you have ISDN deployed gateways, then you should also seriously consider changing the prefixes you use, i.e. Add # to the prefix to break the dial string. For example if your prefix is 99 and you want to call 9912345678, then you dial 99 #12345678 instead.

    Also see the deployment guide for more information about these issues - step 16, page 41 in particular

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/Telepresence/infrastructure/VCs/config_guide/Cisco_VCS_Basic_Configuration_Cisco_VCS_Control_with_Cisco_VCS_Expressway_Deployment_Guide_X7-0.PDF

    /Jens

    Please note the answers and score the questions as "answered" as appropriate.

  • I get phone calls from a person telling me that my email is corrupted

    Corrupted e-mail

    I get phone calls from a person telling me that my email is corrupt and trying to connect to my computer, so they can solve the problem.  I have not heard any questions about msn email be corrupted.  Want some answers.

    Hi CLAUDEFRANCIS,

    Microsoft introduces not calls to customers about technical assistance. More than likely the person calling you is a scam. For your protection, do not provide information personal to that person or him allows to access your machine remotely.

  • BlackBerry Smartphones personal names in address book are not displayed when they only call the number they call from?

    My number is displayed only in the next issues of appeal.

    When someone I recorded in my book calls address their name used to display, now I get only the number they call from?

    Do I have to change a setting?

    Why the name sop appearing?

    He has a bee a few weeks now?

    I removed the battery and electric bike

    Don't check for updates... any help

    Went to a Verizon Center... no help!

    I can't thank you enough

    I went to the article and he's referring to this:

    It was caused by a bad security parameter, called content protection!

    I enclose the item for later use, it's a real miracle solution, you're very kind!

    Summary of the Causes

    This problem may be caused by one of the following:

  • I just got a call from the so-called azm1.protection.status.alert

    I have no idea who/what it is. I did respond to the call. Has anyone else got this call for you? Is it Skype or should I worry?

    Calls from this account isn't Skype and this account is now blocked.
    In the future if you get a call like that of someone who claims to be Skype or informing you that your computer needs to download some software protection, then please report it to customer service: https://support.skype.com/en/faq/FA1170/How-can-I-contact-Skype-Customer-Service

    André

    If the answer was helpful, please mark with congratulations , and if the problem is resolved you can mark it with solution. This will help other users found this answer more easily. Thanks in advance!

  • Had a call from a company called PC efix and request my computer's infected badly and can solve the problem. They have a web address. Are they known to be a reputable company or organization of scam?

    Original title: company PC Efix

    Had a call from a company called PC efix and request my computer's infected badly and can solve the problem. They have a web address. Are they known to be a reputable company or organization of scam?

    The fact that they called you is violating your privacy. For service companies, if you call them and ask for help, they will call you back or if request you the support from them. But if someone calls you out of blue and you say they could help you, it is likely to be a SCAM, I suggest to take a look at:

    http://cyberdefend.WordPress.com/2010/05/14/Hello-i-am-from-Microsoft/

  • Why can't I send email from one of my addresses to another one of my friends, in Outlook Express 6 on explorerer?

    Why can't I send email from one of my addresses to another one of my friends, in Outlook Express 6 on explorerer?

    AF

    What happens when you try?  There is nothing inherent in OE that will let you send messages to yourself.

    Steve

  • I can't open my email account please help me my email id is * address email is removed from the privacy * and my cell number is 09820010620

    I can't open my email account please help me my email id is * address email is removed from the privacy * and my cell number is * deleted phone number *.

    View all Windows Live and Hotmail questions in the appropriate forum found here:
    http://windowslivehelp.com/

    Stupid idea posting your cell phone number.

  • How to use today's date in liquid when it is called from a campaign by email

    I have an email campaign that is configured to run every 7 days and I want to restore specific entries of a Web application based on the current date.

    I use the below in the content of the email:

    {module_webapps myCategory = 'Cat1' render = "collection" template="/layouts/custom/rounds-collection.tpl" id = "cms-towers" filter = "all"}

    and within the referenced model, I use the below to get today's date.

    {assign % = globals.site.dateNow | date: "yyyy-MM-dd" | convert: 'day'-%}

    The problem is that globals.site.dateNow makes whites when called from a campaign by e-mail.

    If I use the same method as before in a web page (rather than an email campaign), it works perfectly so I guess that globals.site.dateNow is not available in an email campaign.

    That's why I tried another way which is to pass another parameter of the module including the delivery date of the email (as shown below):

    {module_webapps myCategory = make 'Cat1' myDate = "{tag_deliverydate}" = "collection" template="/layouts/custom/rounds-collection.tpl" id = "cms-towers" filter = "all"}

    It is however is to make meanings like 'text' in the email. He has successfully replaced the {tag_deliverydate} with 'October 19, 2015', but it does not then decipher the tag module. I guess it's a bit a chicken and the egg tag thing which should make first.

    How do date 'today' or "email delivery date" available in my template file, then use this value in my liquid logic in an email campaign?

    You cannot run javascript in the emails.
    What you try to you can still.

  • How can I remove the underscore from the e.mail addresses as this causes a ~ unable to deliver ~ message when e.mailing contact my German, that email address has a _____ in the address

    How to remove the underline from an e.mail address, where there is a _ that causes a message "unable to deliver.

    The recommended solution was not successful, but I solved the problem, I use Windows live Hotmail, this

    works well and I am now using this. Thanks for all help

    K.Anns

  • Scam: received a call from an Indian guy claiming to be from Microsoft

    I just got a call from an Indian guy who claims to be from Microsoft.  When I questioned him ask for a web address and phone number to verify, also told me that they couldn't give me that because of the data protection. The call showed up on my phone as our area, so I was suspicious immediately.  The guy pointed out that whenever we went on the internet/email it was malicious spyware software download and it needed to be sorted.  When I probed more, saying I didn't, he said he was calling for the United Kingdom.  It changed so his tune to say he was calling the part G Tech Support from Microsoft.

    I guess it's a scam, but I am very concerned that some people may believe this story!  I see that you have posted questions on your Web site regarding this company and it doesn't seem to be a scam, it is why, could you become aware on your website that it is a scam and place it in a very visible.

    Kind regards.

    Julie

    Scam, see this:

  • I got a phone call from a benny edwards who said Microsoft and had found problems with my computer.

    * Original title: defraud my computer

    I got a phone call from a benny edwards who said Microsoft had found problems with my computer and the pirates had gotten him. As I have had some problems recently with the computer, I thought it was authentic and fell for it? After a long telephone conversation, he forced me to accept that my Bullguard anti virus and my malware Remover is not enough to protect the computer and forced me to buy a program from Microsoft (this man of course) not microsoft. It supports the remote computer, and then forced me to give him my details, name, address, telephone number and age and of course the fool that I am, my credit card number, the penny dropped when he asked the Envoy of money via western union.  When I told her that I was closing the phone call, he told fort and wiped a number of things from my computer, the computer wasn't sure.  I ran my scanner (twice) bullguard, run my anti malware program, changed my password and order my credit card, is there something more I can do?

    To protect yourself, your information and your PC, follow these steps:

    • Change your computer password, change the password on your main email account and change the password for all accounts, including your Bank and credit.
    • Immediately scan your PC with the Microsoft Security Scanner to see if you have the tools malicious/phishing software installed on your PC.
    • As a third step, I recommend that you run the verification of Security Essentials on this page. The check will ensure that the security features in Windows are normally very active and running.
    • Personally, I have a clean Windows installation, because something could have been tampered with.

    For more information, visit the Microsoft Internet and Security Safety Center

    For more information on how you can these types of phone scams, visit this site.

    I hope this information has helped. Let us know if you have any additional questions.

  • Urgent request for HELP, received a phone call from GEEKS for PC TO fix my computer, because theres a Trojan horse horse hidden on my Thru Microsoft Windows folders.

    I received a phone call from microsoft technology who wanted to go on my computer & difficulty a Trojan horse, which is on my computers (more than one computer in my house). If I don't get this fixed right away, I could lose my computers & will not work to full capascity as before the Trojan horse was built-in on my computers in the last 10 days. I was very leary about it wanted to check into that first. He said he could remember at an agreed time. So I set up to 22/05/12 at 4:30 pm p.t.. Is it a scam? This should be an international alert to all users of mircosoft for msn & email clients. They would come by phone now. SO WHAT IS GOING ON HERE? !!!

    Hello

    It's a SCAM!

    Avoid scams to phone for tech support
    http://www.Microsoft.com/security/online-privacy/avoid-phone-scams.aspx

    In the United States, you can contact the FBI, Attorney general, the police authorities and consumer
    Watch groups. Arm yourself with knowledge.

    The Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) is a partnership between the Federal Bureau of Investigation
    (FBI) and the National White Collar Crime Center (NW3C), funded in part by the Bureau of Justice Assistance
    (BJA).
    http://www.ic3.gov/complaint/default.aspx

    No, Microsoft wouldn't you not solicited. Or they would know if errors exist on your
    computer. So that's the fraud or scams to get your money or worse to steal your identity.

    Avoid scams that use the Microsoft name fraudulently - Microsoft is not unsolicited
    phone calls to help you fix your computer
    http://www.Microsoft.com/protect/fraud/phishing/msName.aspx

    Scams and hoaxes
    http://support.Microsoft.com/contactus/cu_sc_virsec_master?ws=support#tab3

    Microsoft Support Center consumer
    https://consumersecuritysupport.Microsoft.com/default.aspx?altbrand=true&SD=GN&ln=en-us&St=1&wfxredirect=1&gssnb=1

    Microsoft technical support
    http://support.Microsoft.com/contactus/?ws=support#TAB0

    Microsoft - contact technical support
    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/help/contact-support

    I hope this helps.

    Rob Brown - Microsoft MVP<- profile="" -="" windows="" expert="" -="" consumer="" :="" bicycle="" -="" mark="" twain="" said="" it="">

     
  • I received a call from Microsoft

    There was a call from Microsoft, the number is+ 20227681500. Ask ahsan shahab, but unfortunately I had not received the call. If someone had made the call so please answer me.my email is ()* address email is removed from the privacy *).

    Did you expect a call from Microsoft (for example, in response to a support request, that you had made for them? If this isn't the case, then unrequested calls of this nature are almost always a common scam. Do not let them give any info, do not give access to your PC, not give them all the money and do not go to all the websites that they suggest. One moment.

    Please see:

    http://www.Microsoft.com/en-GB/security/online-privacy/avoid-phone-scams.aspx

    Microsoft issues never not solicited for phone calls of support or security.

    These types of callers can use completely fictitious names or bogusly claim to be of real companies other than Microsoft as well.

Maybe you are looking for

  • IPhoto 1.5 book

    I used Iphoto to create books to print in the past and and worked very well. I started working on a book in the 1.5 version and found there is no way to manipulate the page layouts. I would like to change the size of the frames (holds the photo), tur

  • my safari cannot open the page? It is said ' because unable to connect to the server.

  • XPS 8700 is this normal?

    So I did a test of stress with dells support Wizard and everything this past but for me it does not seem that the fans are moving fast enough and most of the time while the game crawls the fan at all. At the normal time to be under a stress test? CPU

  • BlackBerry BB Leap Leap: How to keep the e-mails

    How can I in detail prevent emails from days before disappearing automatically on both the device and mixture of BB. I prefer to do it manually, but how? Thanks in advance!

  • AppVolumes 3.0 and Java

    Check to see if anyone has faced this again. The scenario is we've captured 4 apps far on Win7x64 (Chrome, Firefox, Flash and Reader) and everything worked perfectly. These Appstacks are loaded in the inventory, and all is well. Whenever we try to ca