Camera entre.200 a.232 image quality degradation

Similar Questions

• When I select the text to recognize, the image quality degrades.

  How can I get for a change?  Using Windows 7 Professional and Adobe Acrobat Pro XI.  This also happens at home when I use Windows 10 and Adobe Acrobat Pro XI.

  Hi G 3481 ,

  You will be asked to you allows you to check whether or not the software is updated after passing by ' help > look for updates. If no update is available, please install.

  If the documents are scanned, this month of may has arrived. It is totally on DPI value during execution of the OCR(recognize text).

  Suggest you to change the settings for "dpi" to increase added value after going to the settings option.

  Kind regards

  Christian

• S70 satellite image quality - A - 11 H web camera is not good

  Hello

  Running windows 8.1 which came with the laptop.
  New out of the box.

  According to the title.

  I find the quality of the image of the camera very grainy color image, poor etc.

  When I start the webcam using the search bar on the right, he begins using the Microsoft application, when you access all the parameters that is available under settings/options is Photo image format, the grid lines, the location information.

  I've been in touch with Toshiba support who advised to do a refresh of laptop, I did.
  It made no difference.

  After which they asked me to find the Toshiba web camera application on your laptop, it should have been in the Program Files folder in the folder of Toshiba.
  This application does not exist on my laptop.

  Technology verified the same laptop model, that he was available, he said when he selected the webcam, he opened using Web of Toshiba, Microsoft no camera app.

  I looked at the other portable Toshiba with web cameras and found the picture quality to be better. Unable to get to settings and these computers portable on-screen and in demo mode, so locked up to a certain extent.

  I can't believe a web camera in this day and age for this value of laptop to have this bad image quality. My digital camera of 10 years ago has a better picture quality.

  I checked through the laptop, and I don't have this app installed.

  I have checked for software and drivers updated to my laptop and cannot find this application applies to my laptop. Etc drivers seem to be up to date.

  I would like to know, other users of this series S have any camera image quality problem.
  What application is used when the camera is selected, Toshiba or Microsoft.

  Is Toshiba web camera application for Windows 8.1, that I don't see not listed for 8.1
  This sounds like a hardware failure or a problem with the application/software.

  Any guidance or help on this would be appreciated, because I came to a point of the return of this laptop for a refund.

  Thanks in advance.

  D.

  Yes, I tried using FORCE!

  > Technology checked the same laptop model, that he was available, he said when he selected the webcam, he opened using Web of Toshiba, Microsoft no camera app.

  Toshiba webcam app is available for the system Win 7 but win it 8 and 8.1 of Windows system use the webcam from Microsoft to the own address application.

  > I looked at the other portable Toshiba with web cameras and found the picture quality to be better.
  Different Toshiba laptops are equipped with different webcams.
  Satellite S70 - A - 11 H was fitted with a * 0.92 mega pixel webcam *.

  For example a Satellite A660 was equipped with a mega pixel webcam_ _1.3M

  There is therefore a difference of resolution of the webcam

• SVE14123CNB with camera of 64-bit windows 8 is to give a very bad image quality.

  My sony vaio SVE14123CNB with camera of 64-bit windows 8 is to give a very bad image quality.

  I have compained several times to sony, but they said that there is problem with windows 8 and this laptop model.

  I think that this response is not the solution to the problem, as it is my work that still hinder once. This laptop has with exmor HD webcam, so we expect the quality of the picture from the webcam to be strong, but it is dark, blurry, vary hard to identify someone even. It is even lower than some old VGA cam.

  Please provide a rigid solution.

  Hello krishna_18,

  The most common cause of this problem is a poorly lit room.  Please try to use the camera in well-lit areas.  Since there is no light or flash on the camera device, it is not able to work as well in dark situations.

  As to the answer before someone gave you "problem with Windows 8";  What they probably meant is that this laptop does not come with any software the camera included.  Therefore, the "Camera" app Windows 8 is what is natively provided and used.  This application is very limited in options and resolution.  Using an alternative app camera of your choice can also improve options, parameters, and results.

• Satellite L755D - Webcam: very bad image quality?

  Hello @all,

  I have a SAT. 755 (OS: win7 64 bit). The webcam returns a very bad image quality and I noticed that the driver is from the year 2006 (Microsoft, Version 6.1.760.17514).

  I installied the last 'pilot' vom site of Toshiba (version 2.0.0.19), which actually just updated the CAM software.

  It is a fact, that this webcam is of very poor quality, or could someone please help me improve the photos, which are not only in poor Skype, but also when I just test the cam.

  Greetings from the Austria
  erkg1959

  Hello

  Please check the film in front of the lens is detached.
  I think that many models is delivered with a protective film in front of the goal and it is not too easy to do.

  See you soon!

  Tom

• Bad PCI-1405 image quality

  I just got a fg PCI-1405 to replicate an old Imaging System. I use a Sony XC - ST50 (PAL) monochrome camera.

  The image quality is poor. He has a blurry pixelated, look to it. I remember that the last time I bought the fg of low-end of NOR, I had a similar problem and had to switch to the Commission more expensive which worked very well. I find it had to believe that NEITHER would sell a POS, so what am I doing wrong? Is there some sort of configuration that I'm missing?

  Note: I have the camera set up like a PAL camera standard.

  Thank you!

  It is a device of XC-ST50CE. However, I was playing around with some parameters. This combination gave me good results:

  Luma - full bandwidth

  Luma comb - disabled

  Trap of Chroma - off

  Luma peaked - disabled

  Bandwidth of Chroma - high (probably any)

  Comb of Chroma - off (probably any)

  Treatment of Chroma - always off (probably any)

• my image quality when using photoshop on my ipad Lossing pro, do you know why? Thank you

  Usually, I imported the image of my Nikon D750 directly into my pro Ipad so I can edit them with Photoshop but at the end, when you try to print my photo the image quality is really bad so I can't print it?

  Any help would be much appreciated.

  Thank you

  Hello gusphotographe and Andrei!

  Unfortunately, the RAW files are not fully supported in Fix or Mix. That's why you can be faced with problems with degradation or trouble to open the images. I know it's frustrating, I apologize for the inconvenience!

  Please let me know if I can help with anything else.

  See you soon!

  -Kathleen

• The upgrade and image quality [compare the elements to Photoshop]

  Hello:

  I've been using 6 items (yes I know, pre-historic) to edit and organize my photos. My collection of items has about 2600 images. Time to upgrade and I am convinced that Lightroom is the way forward for the organization. My question is for the Assembly. Almost all of my editing has been managed by the elements basic stuff. I wonder if I need the full Photoshop provided with Creative Cloud.

  My first question is program Photoshop will produce a better quality in a picture if I did the same editing with my old Elements 6. There was an improvement in the image processing program?

  Notice please.

  Jim Rendos

  Hi Jim

  Camera RAW is certainly improved, the come of great change with PV2012 (process Version 2012 aka ACR 7) introduced with Photoshop CS6.  Other changes have been made to Camera RAW, and Lightroom even more, but their impact on the image quality is zero (AFAICR).  Of course, you'd have the same version of treatment with the recent versions of Lightroom if you take this route.

  The difference between PV2012 and PV2010 are noticeable in the shadow and highlight recovery.  Especially to hide him.  You remember produces bad artifacts setting shadows / highlights.  PV2012 allows you to push the bejazus from a RAW file while keeping things at least somewhere near sensitive.  I've always hated the shadows / highlights and could never understand the fuss people do about it.

  Who help me?

• A question about the image quality?

  I create my menus by using an image that is offered by selected relative when positioning.

  That's by the by... However my menu option is set on the screen as 30 pixels wide.

  If I create the actual image as 30 pixels wide so that the text is very unbalanced and is horrible.

  So if my menu shows 400px by 30px w h and image real must be 800px w h how do I create a good quality image without having such quality terrible 30px?

  I create higher resolution and then somehow reduce the width of the bottom?

  Thank you

  Terry

  Do you use a high-resolution Retina Display?

  Image quality is determined by the total number of pixels in your image - h X w, 325 x 200 500 x 400 vs and the 72 vs 96 ppi vs 300.  So if your screen has a pixel density of high, normal web images may appear grainy on your device but is generally not a problem for the screens with a normal pixel density.

  Consider using the Bootstrap Glyphicons or Fonts-Awesome icons and SVG.

  Open your PSD into illustrator and SaveAs SVG (scalable vector) that is much sharper than bitmaps.

  See the following article:

  A guide to creating a better web of retina - Ivo Mynttinen / User Interface DDesigner

  Nancy O.

• Image quality problem, please help

  Hi, I'm pretty new in InDesign (I use CS4). When I open a new file and create a new document, I use the file > place command to place my images where I would like it and then define 'high quality display' display performance and he does it for the moment and I, and then save and close the file. When I open it upwards at a later date, quality came at a glance pixelated low quality, grainy, and it doesn't seem to save himself. I'm afraid that when I send it to the printer there get shit, how can permanently, I put this to a high quality and it stay that way?

  Second, since I'm new to all this, I didn't know that you must include the file to send to the printer (otherwise it just remains as a link and is visible on the computer you are currently using) but am I right in assuming that once I incorporated the file for the document that it will become a part of the document to send to the printer for all to see?

  Any help would be greatly appreciated, thank you!

  First, define default high quality screen display performance preferences and you won't have to come back every time. Do it with nothing open. to set global default.

  When sending file to the printer you have two options: firstly, Package (file > package...) who will gather your files and the required links and fonts (which are not limited) in one folder, you can give to the printer. Secondary and better, is to export a PDF file to the printer's specifications and give them a single file that has everything integrated. You don't need to embed images yourself.

• The image quality of MacBook Air vs Pro

  Hello

  I just bought a MacBook Air 13 "and I got a MacBook Pro 13" (non-retine) till now.
  If I compare the image quality between Air and Pro there is a difference of contrast and sharpness of the colors. The monitors setting is the same on both Macs, the Air is even supposed to have high resolution (1440 x 900 instead of 1280 x 800, the MacBook Pro). Graphics card is Intel HD Graphics 6000 1536 MB vs 4000 in my MacBook Pro.

  Anyone know if there is a difference in both computers display technology, or if this could be a problem in my Macbook Air?

  THX in advance and best regards

  Products and specifications:

  MacBook Air (13 ", Anfang 2015)

  Intel Core i7 2.2 GHz

  8 GB 1600 MHz DDR3

  Intel HD Graphics 6000 1536 MB

  LCD display is different between Pro and Air. Don't know which group is better.

• Toshiba Camileo Pro HD - bad image quality camcorder

  I recently bought a toshiba camileo pro hd camcorder due to its size and 720 hd quality.

  I connected through my wlt toshiba tv via the component cable, but the picture quality is bad. It seems very grainy. I thought it was the connection, but these have been checked and were perfect.

  IM pretty impressed if this is how it will run even if it was valuable.

  I'm doing something wrong?

  Cheers for all the advice

  Hello

  If you image quality is bad check details in the menu setting by choosing the right standard of TV (try PAL and NTSC as an alternative).

  And if the LCD screen image is unclear when shooting, try to turn the ring to 'Focus' on the circumference of the lens on the proper position: (general/Figure/Macro)

  Good bye

• IdeaPad Yoga 13 - HDMI of bad image quality on the TV 1080 p screen?

  Hi people, I have recently connected my Yoga via HDMI to my TV Samsung 40 ". Unfortunately, the image quality does not as good as my old T61 via VGA hooked up to my TV. Image via HDMI on my TV has some sort of "shadows" around the edges at all. I use a HDMI Basics Amazon cable that is capable of 3D and Ethernet over HDMI - I think this cable should be ok.

  Did it someone else faced with problems with the picture quality of the Yoga on a TV via HDMI before?

  Just for completeness: it was my TV sharpness settings. I had to turn off completely disable the artifacts.

• The image quality with the Canon 5Dmark 2 vs... The 5Dmark3?

  I use Leica lenses on a canon with an adapter body.  Is the image quality with the Canon 5Dmark 2 vs.the 5Dmark3 similar?  A reason to get one against the other?  I like the idea that I can change the viewfinder on the Mk 2 screens. Any overwhelming improvement in the 5Dmark 3 that would justify the review?  Thanks to those who have used the two boxes.

  The main advantage of a Mk3 on the Mk2 is the AF.  Most points and it can focus with f/8.   If your Leica lens is manual focus, then you would not care to this topic.  3 5 has a bit of an advantage in the ISO but not a huge factor.  Another one, I'd say that IQ is the same.

• C720 image quality

  Hello

  I bought a new acer chromebook C720. Everythings are perfect, except the image quality. Photos either on Youtube or resemble other pages on photo of day old negative (sepia). He did the chromebook useless for me. Can someone help me find the solution. Is that the question of parameters or the problem is the machine/operating system.

  Thank you

  Valerie

  I found the problem. I had checked for high contrast. Once I unchecked, all right. I found the Acer excellent C720 chromebook.